our lady of mercy facilities stewardship summary · 2019. 11. 5. · • brooklyn friends school...

Our Lady of Mercy – Facilities Stewardship Summary

Presentation of Results October 17, 2018

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

3

7

11

19

21

54

74

About THE STONE HOUSE GROUP

Conceptual Philosophies

Campus Metrics

Project Goals and Scope

Facilities Conditions Assessment (FCA)

Space Study

Energy Discussion

Questions

Who we are…

Who we serve…

About THE STONE HOUSE GROUP 3

THE STONE HOUSE GROUP: WHO WE ARE…

4

Bethlehem, PA

Washington, D.C.

Facilities Consulting Firm

Strengthening mission and

distinctive needs of

academic, not-for-profit,

and corporate institutions

300+ Clients Served

150+ Education Clients

1999 Year Founded

THE STONE HOUSE GROUP: WHO WE SERVE…

5

• Shorecrest Preparatory

School

• Pace Academy

• Georgetown Day School

• Wilmington Friends School

• Bullis School

• Notre Dame Preparatory

School

• Carolina Friends School

• Holton-Arms School

• St. Alban’s School

• The Lab School of

Washington

• St. Patrick’s Episcopal Day

• Wilmington Friends School

• St. Paul’s School

• The Lawrenceville School

• The Hotchkiss School

• The Pingry School

• Garrison Forest School

• Rutgers Preparatory School

• Riverdale Country School

• Stuart Country Day School

• The Wardlaw-Hartridge

School

• Miss Porter’s School

• Brooklyn Friends School

• Far Hills Country Day

School

• Deerfield Academy

• Episcopal School of Dallas

• Greenwich Academy

• National Presbyterian

School

• St. Andrew’s School

• Sichuan Province Schools in

Chengdu, China

• Antilles School (USVI)

• Princeton University

• University of Pennsylvania

• Sweet Briar College

THE STONE HOUSE GROUP: WHO WE SERVE…

6

5,959,000

1,971,888

13,690,550

1,431,335

0

2,000,000

4,000,000

6,000,000

8,000,000

10,000,000

12,000,000

14,000,000

16,000,000

Colleges/Universities Gov/Public Independent Schools Other

GSF

Client Type

CONCEPTUAL PHILOSOPHIES 7

Management

Effort

8

BUILDING STEWARDSHIP

Management

Effort Value

Management

Effort

Environmental Stewardship

Cycle Maintenance

Deferred Maintenance

Modernization

Capital Construction

Add Value Fundraising

Identity

Environmental Programs

Performance

Improve Management Master Plan

Utility Plan

Space Utilization Study

Life Cycle Cost Analysis

8

MASTER PLANNING INPUTS & OUTPUTS

A Facilities Stewardship Plan provides an important piece of the overall Campus Master Plan for

Facilities Stewardship as depicted in the figure below, Master Planning – Inputs & Outputs.

9

MASTER PLANNING INPUTS & OUTPUTS

A Facilities Stewardship Plan provides an important piece of the overall Campus Master Plan for

Facilities Stewardship as depicted in the figure below, Master Planning – Inputs & Outputs.

10

Building Inventory

Understanding Building Age

Enrollment by Division

Gross Square Feet per Student

Operations

Housekeeping

Trades

Operating Budget

CAMPUS METRICS 11

BUILDINGS SURVEYED – GROSS SQUARE FEET (GSF)

12

Total GSF = 88,300

(GSF information is estimated)

45,000

25,000

8,000

6,300

4,000

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

50,000

School Building Church Building Parish House Rectory 9320 Mercy Hollow Ln

GSF

Building

BUILDING AGES (ORIGINAL VS RESET)

13

GSF Shown in Reset Range Range as Percentage of Total GSF

SHG defines a reset age as the age when a building’s major MEP and Envelope systems have had major renovations since the

date of original construction. Of the 88,300 GSF of building space surveyed, 65% has an age of more than 20 years.

Although there have been some replacement and upgrade projects through the years, it could not be determined if any of the

buildings have had holistic renovations.

6,300

25,000

57,000

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

Less than 10 11 to 20 More than 20

GSF

Age Range (Years)

Less than 10

7%

11 to 20 28%

More than 20 65%

BENCHMARKING GROSS SQUARE FEET (GSF) PER STUDENT

14

14

15

13

22

15

22

17

22

24

20

18

17

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Pre-K3

Pre-K4 H

Pre-K4 B

K

Grade 1

Grade 2

Grade 3

Grade 4

Grade 5

Grade 6

Grade 7

Grade 8

# of Students

Div

isio

n

2018/2019 Enrollment = 219

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

GS

F/S

tud

en

t

GSF PER STUDENT Surveyed Institutions

Bullis

Chestnut Hill Academy

Georgetown Day School

Indian Creek School

Kent Place

La Salle College HS

New Canaan Country

School

Germantown Academy

Landon

St. Patricks '11

St. Patricks '12

Marymount

Moorestown Friends

National Cathedral

National Presbyterian

Notre Dame Prep '10

Notre Dame Prep '11

Pingry

Rutgers Prep

Springside

St. Patrick's

The Field School

Williams

Montgomery

School

Average for surveyed

day schools

283 GSF per student

BENCHMARKING GROSS SQUARE FEET (GSF) PER STUDENT

15

Total GSF = 88,300 (estimated)

Current Enrollment = 219

Church and School Buildings

Only School Building

403

205

HOUSEKEEPING GSF/FTE

16

48,500

37,825

31,229 31,022

29,091 28,972 27,169 26,673

23,527 22,189 19,888

15,066

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

Independent Schools

Abington Friends

Chatham


Far Hills School

Gettysburg College

Hotchkiss School

Indian Creek

Lab School

Lawrenceville School

Metet School

Milton Hershey School

Pingry School

Riverdale

Rutger's Prep

St. Paul's for Girls

Springside School

Taft School

Town

Trinity School

Walnut Hill School

GS

F/F

TE

Our Lady of Mercy

TRADES GSF/FTE

17

128,172

97,354

83,687

64,158

61,515

50,000

40,741

33,099 30,885 29,433 28,333 26,690

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

140,000

Independent Schools

Abington Friends

Canterbury

Chatham


Far Hills School

Gettysburg College

Hotchkiss School

Indian Creek

Lawrenceville School

Marymount School

Meret School

Milton Hershey School

Pingry School

Riverdale

Rutger's Prep

Springside School

St. Hilda & Hugh's

St. Paul's (Md)

St. Paul's for Girls

Taft School

Town School

Trinity School

Walnut Hill School

GS

F/F

TE

Our Lady of Mercy

OPERATING BUDGET $/GSF

18

$3.38 $2.47 $2.35 $2.84

$4.36 $5.29

$2.31 $2.67 $2.18 $1.92

$4.01 $2.59 $2.87

$3.81 $2.82

$1.52 $2.44

$1.78 $2.22 $1.66 $2.56 $2.32 $1.87 $1.66 $1.39

$2.63

$1.39 $2.41

$3.32 $1.24

$0.00

$2.13 $1.12

$0.57 $1.34

$0.00

$0.95 $0.26

$0.62

$0.56

$1.44 $0.61

$0.26 $0.31

$0.00

$0.99 $0.19 $0.66

$0.40 $0.86

$9.86

$11.67 $10.45 $8.78

$8.28 $8.32

$7.67 $8.17

$8.29 $7.40 $6.45 $6.44 $6.78

$5.07 $5.75

$5.10 $4.97 $5.91 $5.33

$5.36

$3.25 $4.17 $4.05

$3.29 $3.08

$0.00

$2.00

$4.00

$6.00

$8.00

$10.00

$12.00

$14.00

$16.00

$18.00

$20.00

Utilities Planned Maintenance Daily Service

$/G

SF

$7.96

$10.46

$9.13

$9.92

$15.86

$13.61

$10.66

$14.93

$8.06

$9.97

$15.54

$13.88

$11.97

$9.50

OLOM

$15.21

$7.02 $6.80 $6.69 $6.57

$5.33

$7.86 $8.02

$12.11

$11.04

$5.36

PROJECT GOALS 19

Facilities Conditions Assessment (FCA)

Space Study

Energy Review

PROJECT SCOPE 20

Process

Terms

Definitions

What’s In / What’s Out

FACILITIES CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT (FCA) - OVERVIEW 21

TYPICAL FCA PROCESS

22

Planning Visit

• Determine Project Schedule

• Initial Data Collection

Inspections

• Room by Room

• AE, AI, MEP, ADA, Life Safety

• Begin Database

Costing

• RS Means

• Field Knowledge

• Construction Cost Data

• Institutional Data

QA

• Internal Review

• Institutional Assessment Review

Analysis

• Review Projects & Costing

• Complete Draft FCA Database

• Complete Draft Presentation, Institutional Review

Present Findings

TYPICAL FCA PROCESS

23

FCA Inspections

Existing Surveys

Integrated FCA

Database

Operations:

Project Selection

Priorities

Planning

Overlap with Program Changes

Financial:

Catch Up

Keep Up

Reserve Funding

Benchmarking

Inputs Outputs

FCA TERMS & DEFINITIONS

24

Preventive Maintenance & Daily Service:

Routine tasks performed frequently and funded through the annual operating

budget. They are essential to the use of the buildings but do not add to the asset

value of the institution.

Cycle Maintenance:

The process of assuring that building

components are replaced at or near

the end of their useful lifecycles.

Documented as depreciation on an

institution’s financial records, these cycles exceed a single year and may even span

decades.

Deferred Maintenance:

Accumulates when cycle maintenance is left undone, due to limited financial or

physical (labor, materials, time)

resources. Significant deferred maintenance can erode the physical assets of the institution

and may eventually render buildings

unusable and their systems nonfunctional.

Modernization:

The process for improving facilities. It

may be driven by changing programs,

code and safety requirements, or the impact of technology.

Safety / Statutory:

These are Modernization

projects recommended

specifically because of a safety requirement.

FCA TERMS & DEFINITIONS

25

Immediate exposure; should be completed within one year

High priority; should be completed in one to two years

Priority; should be completed in three to five years

Planned; should be completed in six to ten years

Priority

1*

Priority

1

Priority

2

Priority

3

FCA PROJECTS – WHAT’S IN? WHAT’S OUT?

26

What’s Out? What’s In?

Snapshot - FCA Database

Data by Priority

Data by Maintenance Category

Data by Maintenance Type

Need by Building

Indices

Gap Analysis

Select Project Write-ups

FACILITIES CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT - FINDINGS 27

*It is important to note that THE STONE HOUSE GROUP priced all projects using current dollars, taking into account

location factors, and excluded inflation. SHG also used institutional cost estimates where applicable. Replacement

projects were status quo unless otherwise noted.

FCA DATABASE

28

Record

er Proj # Bldg Floor Room Category Trade Object Action Unit Qty Unit Cost Total Cost Est. Age Est Life Priority Impact

MH 9320 Mercy Hollow

Lane LL Living Room AI Carpeting Carpet Replace sf 620 $7 $4,340 3 Cycle


Lane LL Living Room AI Painting Walls Repaint sf 620 $3 $1,550 3 Cycle


Lane LL Living Room AI Painting Ceiling Repaint sf 620 $2 $1,240 3 Cycle


Lane LL Bedroom 1 AI Carpeting Carpet Replace sf 155 $7 $1,085 3 Cycle


Lane LL Bedroom 1 AI Painting Walls Repaint sf 155 $3 $388 3 Cycle


Lane LL Bedroom 1 AI Painting Ceiling Repaint sf 155 $2 $310 3 Cycle


Lane LL Linen Closet AI Carpeting Carpet Replace sf 55 $7 $385 3 Cycle


Lane LL Linen Closet AI Painting Walls Repaint sf 55 $3 $138 3 Cycle


Lane LL Linen Closet AI Painting Ceiling Repaint sf 55 $2 $110 3 Cycle


Lane LL Bathroom 1 AI Painting Walls Repaint sf 40 $3 $100 3 Cycle


Lane LL Bathroom 1 AI Painting Ceiling Repaint sf 40 $2 $80 3 Cycle


Lane LL Bathroom 1 MEP Plumbing Sink fixtures Replace ea 1 $180 $180 2 Cycle


Lane LL Bedroom 2 AI Carpeting Carpet Replace sf 80 $7 $560 3 Cycle


Lane LL Bedroom 2 AI Painting Walls Repaint sf 80 $3 $200 3 Cycle


Lane LL Bedroom 2 AI Painting Ceiling Repaint sf 80 $2 $160 3 Cycle


Lane LL Storage Rm

Safety /

Statutory Fire Safety Smoke Detection Install ea 1 $200 $200 1 Safety / Statutory

Priority 1* Immediate

Priority 1 1-2 Years



IDENTIFIED NEED BY PRIORITY

29

Total Identified Need $ 4,140,322

Priority 1, $779,298, 19%

Priority 2, $614,645, 15% Priority 3, $2,707,830,

65%

Priority 1*, $38,550, 1%

IDENTIFIED NEED BY PRIORITY

30

Church Buildings ($2,363,632) School Building ($1,776,690)


Priority 1, $152,598, 7%

Priority 2, $388,145,

16%

Priority 3, $1,801,090,

76%

Priority 1*, $21,800, 1%

Priority 1, $626,700,

35%

Priority 2, $226,500,

13%

Priority 3, $906,740,

51%

Priority 1*, $16,750, 1%

IDENTIFIED NEED BY MAINTENANCE CATEGORY

31

Architectural Exterior, $848,190, 21%

Architectural Interior, $848,542, 21%

Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, $2,120,490,

51%

Safety/Statutory, $18,100, 0%

Grounds, $305,000,

7%

Electrical

• Lighting repairs

• Wiring

• Keypad System

• Generator

• Chair lift

Mechanical

• Gym RTU

• Trane DX Units

• AHU’s

• BAS Upgrade

• Trane Chiller

Plumbing

• Restroom Fixtures

• Hot Water

Heaters

• Various Pumps

• Water Fountains

Safety / Statutory

• Stage Access

• Fire Safety

Arch. Ext & Grounds

• Windows

• Playground

• Roof Systems

• Asphalt

• Water Proofing

Arch. Interior

• Carpet

• Painting

• Flooring

• Carpentry


IDENTIFIED NEED BY MAINTENANCE CATEGORY

32



Architectural Exterior,

$592,990, 25%

Architectural Interior,

$423,542, 18%

Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing,

$1,039,000, 44%

Safety/Statutory, $3,100,

0% Grounds,

$305,000, 13%

Architectural Exterior,

$255,200, 14%

Architectural Interior,

$425,000, 24% Mechanical,

Electrical, Plumbing,

$1,081,490, 61%

Safety/Statutory, $15,000,

1%

Grounds, $0, 0%

IDENTIFIED NEED BY MAINTENANCE TYPE

33

Deferred Maintenance, $71,650, 2%

Cycle Maintenance, $3,785,472, 91%

Modernization, $257,700, 6%

Daily Serv/Safety, $25,500, 1%


IDENTIFIED NEED BY MAINTENANCE TYPE

34




Cycle Maintenance, $1,672,740,

94%




Cycle Maintenance, $2,112,732,

89%



IDENTIFIED NEED BY TRADE

35


Carpentry, $141,310 , 3%

Masonry, $27,000 , 1%

Painting, $372,442 , 9%

Roofing, $130,000 , 3%

Flooring, $36,800 , 1%

Plumbing, $61,440 , 1%

Windows, $577,250 , 14%

Special, $204,000 , 5%

Electrical, $71,350 , 2%

Mechanical, $1,987,700 , 48%

Carpeting, $364,630 , 9%

Fire Safety, $600 , 0%

Paving, $165,000 , 4%

IDENTIFIED NEED BY BUILDING

36

$1,776,690

$1,177,900

$440,000

$282,350 $240,600 $222,783

$0

$200,000

$400,000

$600,000

$800,000

$1,000,000

$1,200,000

$1,400,000

$1,600,000

$1,800,000

$2,000,000

School Building Church Building Campus Parish House 9320 MercyHollow Lane

Rectory

Priority 2


IDENTIFIED NEED BY BUILDING BY PRIORITY

37

$0

$200,000

$400,000

$600,000

$800,000

$1,000,000

$1,200,000

$1,400,000

$1,600,000

$1,800,000

$2,000,000

School Building Church Building Campus Parish House 9320 MercyHollow Lane

Rectory

Priority 3

Priority 2

Priority 1 & 1*

Priority 2

$1,776,690

$1,177,900

$440,000

$282,350 $240,600 $222,783


IDENTIFIED NEED BY BUILDING ($/GSF)

38

$60

$39

$35 $35

$18

$13

$0

$10

$20

$30

$40

$50

$60

$70

9320 Mercy HollowLane

School Building Rectory Parish House Church Building Grounds

Identifi

ed N

eed (

$)

/ G

SF

Building

$64.95

$56.74

$54.59

$48.52

$46.89

$39.48

$36.91 $35.56

$31.05 $30.47

$26.98 $26.29

$24.30 $23.51

$19.86

$14.62

$0.00

$10.00

$20.00

$30.00

$40.00

$50.00

$60.00

$70.00

$/G

SF

Institutional Average - $36.03

INDICES

23

Institutions Surveyed

Bullis School Pace School

Delbarton Pingree School

Delaware Valley Friends Riverdale Country School

Garrison Forest Rutgers Preparatory School

Georgetown Day School St. Patrick's Episcopal School

Hotchkiss School Stuart Country Day School

Indian Creek Upland Country Day School

Lab School Westtown School

LaSale College High School Whitby School

Moorestown Friends School Williams School

National Presbyterian School Wilmington Friends School

Church and School Buildings

Only Church Buildings

Only School Building

GAP ANALYSIS

40

$0

$100,000

$200,000

$300,000

$400,000

$500,000

$600,000

$700,000

Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10

Funded

Need

2% Replacement

3% Ops Budget

Identified Need =

2% of Replacement Value over 10 Years =

3% of Operating Budget over 10 years =

$4,140,322

$1,755,000

$6,181,000

The following slides are a sampling of the

overall projects that have been identified during

this Facilities Conditions Assessment.

Select Project Write-ups 41

• Water infiltration issue

• Temporary solution is unsightly and likely does not address problem

• Recommend investigate presence of exterior moisture barrier/waterproofing; install

9320 Mercy Hollow Lane 42

Priority 1

$50,000

• Main Entry

• Concrete Sidewalk

• Consider replacement of concrete at main entry points and pathways

Campus 43

Priority 1

$50,000

• Flat Roof section over dining and kitchen

• Welded copper sheet

• Ongoing leaks into spaces below; flashing along transition has pulled away, likely causing moisture penetration

• Consider repairs

9320 Mercy Hollow Lane 44

Priority 1

$10,000

• The hatch to the lift station has a coating over it to keep out odor

• OLOM pays for semi-annual service to pump out lift station apparently due to controls not working

• It is very likely that odor would not be present if controls worked to properly pump out station; strongly

recommend bringing a mechanical contractor on board to diagnose and repair any issues

Church Sewage Ejector Station 45

Priority 1*

$5,000

• A back storage room at Parish House has two 5-ton split AC units serving an area more suited to a 2-ton unit

• Recommend shutting off and locking out one unit

• Further recommend replacing working unit with a smaller unit as the existing unit ages (~$3,000 for a properly sized unit)

Parish House Storage Room AC Units 46

Priority 1*

$500

• Peerless boiler serving gym area radiators will need replacement in 1-3 years

• Hot water radiators are a very efficient for heating, so recommend keeping this system in place

• However, strongly recommend replacing existing unit with a modern, condensing boiler for vastly improved efficiency, and thus cost savings

Gym Boiler 47

Priority 1

$15,000

• Church building ancillary rooms (music, chapel, basement meeting room) are served by MagicAire dx units

• Units are beginning to age, estimate that they will need replacement in 3-6 years

• Alternate to replacing in-kind, consider consolidating these units in a distributed air, VAV system

Church AC Units 48

Priority 2

$25,000

• Cooling for school is mainly served by many RTU’s, each serving a single zone

• This design is very inefficient and equipment is aging

• Strongly recommend a centralized variable volume system or VRF-based system, instead of replacing RTU’s in kind as they begin to fail

School Building Cooling 49

Priority 2

$125,000

• AHU’s in attic serve admin areas, hallway, etc

• These systems are beginning to age and will need replacement in roughly the same time frame as the RTU’s

• Consider adding these areas to the distributed air, VAV (or VRF) system that would replace RTU’s

School Attic AHU’s 50

Priority 2

*Cost included

with RTU’s

above

• Existing Johnson controls system is aging

• A more modern system will improve user comfort, reduce utility bills, provide

better energy and equipment tracking, and have an up-to-date graphics

interface

Controls Upgrade 51

Priority 3

$125,000

• Main church cooling is served by one air-cooled chiller with a remote evaporator

• Consider installing a redundant chiller, as we have seen examples of facilities

spending large amounts of money when their only source of cooling breaks down

Redundant Cooling 52

Priority 3

$75,000

• OLOM does not have an emergency generator

• Recommend installing generator to prevent forced closure of schools

• Can be sized for load only at school

Generator 53

Priority 3

$25,000

Space Inventory

Observations

Space Study 54

PURPOSE

55

An integral piece of any Master Planning phase Study will help to inform strategic decisions and assessing future goals such as:

Identity Growth Enrollment Facilities Academic Programs Capital Project Strategy

Space has an important relationship with each of these goals…

…and may help to answer:

Does Mercy have enough space?

Are spaces in the right places? Are spaces configured properly? Are there shifts in pedagogy or policy that would change how spaces are used? How should funding be prioritized in addressing space modernizations?

56

SPACE INVENTORY

APPROACH

Space information collected and organized:

Follow standards set forth in Facilities Inventory & Classification Manual by U.S. Department of Education

Building and School Name (or Region)

Building’s Room Number and Local Name

Square footage

Useable Area Identification (FICM as standard)

Use Category (ie. Classroom, Laboratory, Office, General Use, Support Room, Health Care, Circulation, Mechanical

Functional Category (ie. Instruction, Academic Support/Service, Student Services)

57

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR

BUILDING SPACE IDENTIFICATION

SPACE STUDY DATABASE (SNAPSHOT)

58

59

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR

BUILDING SPACE IDENTIFICATION

45,000

41,635

3,365

31,543

10,092

GROSS & NET AREA

Area Square Footage

Gross Square Feet 45,000

Net Square Feet 41,635

% of GSF 93%

Definitions: Gross Square Feet is the total square footage of the building including exterior walls.

Net Square Feet is the total square footage less the structural area (walls, chases, etc)

Non-assignable Area is all areas of a building not available for assignment to an occupant or for specific use, but necessary for

the general operation of a building. This includes circulation, janitorial, restroom and utility/mechanical spaces

Assignable Area is all areas of a building assigned to, or available for assignment to, an occupant or specific use.

Building Service Area

Circulation Area

General Use Area

Office Support Room

Classroom

Health Care

VISUALIZING EXISTING PROGRAM LAYOUT

Laboratory Mechanical Area

Study Facilities

PROGRAM ANALYSIS

Lounge,

Enrichment,

AD

Bui

ldin

g S

erv

ice A

rea

Cir

cula

tion

Are

a

Cla

ssro

om

Gene

ral U

se A

rea

Hea

lth

Ca

re

Lab

ora

tory

Mech

ani

cal A

rea

Off

ice

Stu

dy F

aci

litie

s

Sup

port

Room

Restrooms,

Kitchen,

Storage, Facilities Corridors, Alcoves,

Vestibules, Lobbies

Stage,

Gymnasium,

Kennedy Room

Art Classroom,

Maker Space,

TV Room

Library

BREAKING DOWN NET USABLE AREA

63

Net Assignable Area (31,543 SF) Non-Assignable Area (10,092 SF)

Classroom, 11,230

General Use, 12,115

Office, 1,783

Laboratory, 2,395

Study Facilities,

1,870

Health, 220

Support, 793

Mech/Unclassified, 1,137

Building Services, 3,375

Circulation, 6,717

Net Usable Area 41,635

Structural 3,365

Gross Square Feet 45,000

OBSERVATIONS

64

Space Observation

Classrooms Not Dynamic; Mostly sized for more than 40 students; Unsightly Storage/Coat Rooms; Need more flexible seating;

Consider multiple smaller classrooms for 15+ students

Science / Labs Need to consider program enhancements; more space, adequate shelving, displays casework and outlets

Music Consider space options for storage and teaching; Currently using cart to move about the building with little to no

storage for equipment (PreK to 8); Consider using under-utilized room between Kennedy Room and Art

Display Areas Consider identifying locations for art and athletic displays and adequate lighting; Currently the trophy case is in the

rear corridor away from the Gymnasium, and Art does not have sufficient space

Offices Most of the faculty use their classrooms as their office space; does this work for Mercy? No privacy rooms

School Counselor Currently, the School Counselor office is in the far corner of the School Building; this is not ideal for multiple reasons;

Consider using space closer to Admin/Reception Suite

Storage

There does not appear to be adequate storage facilities and the dedicated storage room adjacent the Gym is not

being utilized to its full potential; much of the material appears to be unused; Could this space be used for another

purpose? Consider reconfiguring spaces closer to the cafeteria for tables/chairs

Safety / Security

Need dedicated location for table / chair storage; currently utilizing adjacent hallways which is creating a safety

hazard should an emergency be recognized while tables are blocking corridor space for egress; Main Entrance -

consider constructing interior vestibule to have visitors flow into reception office, rather than into an open corridor

without properly checking into main office.

OBSERVATIONS – SCHOOL COUNSELOR

65

Currently, the School Counselor has an

office in the far corner of the School

Building.

CONSIDERATIONS – SCHOOL COUNSELOR

66

Consider under-utilized office space in

Admin/Reception Suite for office and

meeting space closer to heart of

building

OBSERVATION – MAIN ENTRY

67

A person gains access through

intercom, but then is free to walk into

building without barrier wall.

CONSIDERATION – MAIN ENTRY

68

Consider constructing interior vestibule

that directs traffic into the main office

for proper identification. The FCA

includes such a project in the database.

OBSERVATION – MUSIC STORAGE

69

Currently, the Music Teacher utilizes a

cart to move about the school with no

touch-down location.

CONSIDER – MUSIC STORAGE

70

Consider utilizing the under-utilized

bookroom adjacent Kennedy Room

OBSERVATIONS – SAFETY / FLOW

71

Students sometimes need to use the

back corridor to use spaces inside the

Church for Music. Also, although the

garden courtyard is not used regularly,

students are still able to access.

CONSIDERATIONS – SAFETY / FLOW

72

In the near-term, identify a dedicated room for music. For safety

purposes, the corridor door leading into the courtyard must remain

unlocked should a student be locked inside the courtyard. This becomes

a safety risk if someone forgets to lock at end of the day. Future

considerations to renovate this approximately 3,000 SF area into

usable space to alleviate the safety risk, insect infestation issue, and

provide usable space.

OBSERVATIONS

73

• Alignment of Divisions (Grades are spread out throughout building)

• Dedicated area of School for Pre-K Division

• Future Expansion Considerations

• Provide needed program space

• Could trigger synergies with centralizing and right-placing Specials

• Provide efficient flow for Facilities who currently traverse the gym during classes

• Could provide more suitable locker space, instead of area adjacent second

entrance

Energy Discussion 74

$1.57

$0.00

$1.00

$2.00

$3.00

$4.00

$5.00

$6.00

BENCHMARKING – ENERGY $/GSF 75

OL Mercy


day schools

$2.02 / GSF

Independent Schools Abington Friends Academy of Notore Dame Agnes Irwin

Ancillae-Assumption Buckingham Friends Bullis School

Cedar Grove Chestnut Hill Concept School

Cornerstone Christian Country Day School Delaware County Christian

Delaware Valley Friends Fairville Friends Friends Central

Friends School Friends Select Georgetown Day

Germantown Friends Garrison Forest Green Tree

Gwyneed Mercy Haverford Hill Top Prep

KHLT LaSalle Marymount

Mervy Vocational Moorestown Friends Moravian Academy

National Presbyterian Newtown Friends Nightingale

PA School for the Deaf Pen Ryn Phila Montgomery Christian

Philadelphia School Pingry School Quajker School

RiverdaleSt. Bail Saint David's Springside

St. Albans St. Hilda & Hugh's St. Paul's (Md)

Town Trinity UNited Friends

Upattinas School Villa Joseph Marie West Chester Friends

West Hill School Whitby School St. Patrick's Episcopal Day School

Sidwell Friends OL Mervy Maret

73

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

BENCHMARKING – MBTU/GSF 2

OL Mercy


day schools

69 MBTU / GSF

Independent Schools

Abington Friends Academy of Notre Dame Agnes Irwin

Ancillae-Assumption Buckingham Friends Cedar Grove

Chestnut Hill Cornerstone Christian Country Day School

Delaware County Chr. Delaware Valley Friends Friends Central

Friends School Friends Select Georgetown Day

Germantown Friends Garrison Forest Green Tree

Gwyneed Mercy Haverford Hill Top Prep

LaSalle Lansdowne Friends Marymount

Mercy Vocational Moorestown Friends Moravian Academy

National Presbyterian Newtown Friends PA School for the Deaf

Pen Ryn Phila Montgomery Chr. Pingry School

Quaker School Riverdale St. Bail Rutgers Prep

United Friends Upattinas School Villa Joseph Marie

West Chester Friends Whitby School Sidwell Friends

St. Pat’s Episcopal Maret OL Mercy

Note: this includes gas and

electric; the church is at 77

MBTU / GSF for electrical

ONLY

$607.59

$0.00

$100.00

$200.00

$300.00

$400.00

$500.00

$600.00

$700.00

$800.00

BENCHMARKING – ENERGY $/STUDENT 77


day schools

498 $ / Student

Independent Schools

Springside Marymount

Chestnut Hill Bullis

National Presbyterian LaSalle College

Moorestown Friends St. Patrick’s

Sidwell Maret

OL Mercy

OL Mercy

BENCHMARKING – ELECTRICITY VS. GAS 78

$9.53

$36.94

$0.00

$5.00

$10.00

$15.00

$20.00

$25.00

$30.00

$35.00

$40.00

Gas Electricity

Energy Source $ / MMBTU

BENCHMARKING – CAMPUS ENERGY CONSUMPTION (MMBTU)

79

3,479 , 56%

2,684 , 44%

Gas Electricity

BENCHMARKING – CAMPUS ENERGY COST 80

$99,146

$33,158

Electricity Gas

HEATING LOAD PROFILE 81

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June

Church / School Parish

RELATIVE ELECTRICAL COST 82

$1,921

$76,136

$3,470

$17,619

Rectory Church Parish School

RELATIVE ELECTRICAL CONSUMPTION (KWH) 83

30,947

570,781

58,677

126,841


COOLING LOAD PROFILE 84

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000


COOLING LOAD PROFILE COMPARISON

Normal cooling load

peaks in summer

months and tails off in

winter

The data for OLOM

does not suggest a

winter decrease

85

BENCHMARKING – CAMPUS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (LBS CO2)

86

407,102

652,942

Gas Electricity

Discussion Points 87

Fuel-burning furnace at Rectory not captured

Move to natural gas in the future

Campus electrical consumption

Cooling load profile

Church is 77% of electrical costs

School cooling via RTU

Age of RTU’s

Energy Conservation Measures (ECM) 88

Retro-Commissioning

Master plan includes modern cooling system for

school

Update BAS

Commissioning

Upgrade lighting to LED

Questions

Thank You! 89

our lady of mercy facilities stewardship summary · 2019. 11. 5. · • brooklyn friends school...

Documents