osha: maritime activities and regulatory update marine chemist association annual seminar chicago,...
TRANSCRIPT
OSHA: Maritime Activities and Regulatory Update
Marine Chemist Association Annual Seminar
Chicago, IllinoisAugust 13 - 15, 2012
OSHA MISH-MASH
• Recent Regulatory Activities• Update on Subpart F• Guidance Activities• Issues Raised by Marine Chemists• MACOSH• Enforcement Data for FY 2011
and 2012
Regulatory ActivityGlobally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS)•Published March 26, 2012•Revises criteria for:
– Classification of chemical hazards– Labeling provisions – requirements for signal words, pictograms, hazard
statements, precautionary statements– Specified format for SDS– Definitions to terms– Requirements for training employees on labels and SDSs
•Several changes to substance specific health standards, PSM, and flammable and combustible liquids to ensure compliance with GHS
Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of
Chemicals (GHS)
• Biggest visible impact: Look of and information required for labels• Signal Words, Pictograms• Precautionary Statements• Appropriate Hazard Warnings
Flame over circle
Oxidizers
Flame Exploding bomb
Flammables; Pyrophorics; Self-Heating; Emits Flammable Gas; Self Reactives; Organic Peroxides
Explosives;; Self Reactives; Organic Peroxides
Gas Cylinder
Gases under pressure
Corrosion Skull and Crossbones
Corrosives Acute toxicity (severe)
Health Hazard
Carcinogen; Mutagenicity; Reproductive Toxicity; Respiratory ;nsitizer; Target Organ Toxicity; Aspiration Toxicity
Environment Exclamation mark
Aquatic Toxicity (OSHA did not propose this pictogram)
Irritant; Skin Sensitizer; Acute Toxicity (harmful); Narcotic effects; Respiratory Tract Irritant; Hazardous to Ozone Layer
GHS Pictograms
Effective Dates:•12/1/2013 - Employee Training on label elements and SDS•6/20/2015 – All modified provisions except:
• 12/1/2015 – All distributed containers must have new formatted labels
• 6/1/2016 – All other provisions and training completed
•During transition time, can follow 1910.1200 as updated 10/1/11, or the current version, or both
GHS Home Page - http://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom
GHS - Continued
Regulatory Activity (cont.). Standards Improvement Project SIPS III - (June 2011)•Updated requirements in 29 CFR 1919 to test and inspect cargo gear every 5 years in accordance with ILO Convention 152; consistent with 1918.11(a)•Previous standard was based on ILO Convention 32, test and inspect every 4 years
SIPS IV•Directorate of Construction•Maritime – Has few candidates
Subpart F – 1 Year Later29 CFR Part 1915, Subpart F - General Working Conditions in Shipyard Employment
Published May 2, 2011June 29, 2011, Shipbuilders Council of America (SCA) filed a petition for review with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit challenging the final rule. July 27, 2011, Court of Appeals directed SCA and OSHA to pursue a settlement agreement. Settlement agreement is comprised of (1)specific provisions within the final rule, as well as (2) revisions to FAQ’s posted on the OSHA webpage.OSHA issued a stay of enforcement until October 31, 2011, for provisions within three sections that included 29 CFR 1915.82, 1915.89, and 1915.93. All provisions are now enforceable with the exception of 29 CFR 1915.89(k)(2)(ii), which has a stay of enforcement until September 10, 2012.
Subpart F – 1 Year LaterU.S. Navy - NOTES•The U.S. Navy pressed for the inclusions of notes in §1915.89 that applied only to vessels or vessel sections that the Navy ships force had control over.
•Notes were only intended to apply to Navy personnel – NOT applicable to contractors or shipyard employees, which are required to follow §1915.89 provisions.
•Two issues recently raised by the Navy:1. Difficulty finding tags that meet 1915.89 specifications2. The cost associated with supplies and implementation
U.S. Coast GuardDespite no involvement during proposed or final rule drafting, the Coast Guard has requested that the “Navy” notes apply to them as well.
Subpart F – 1 Year LaterFeral CatsParagraphs 1915.88(j)(1) and (j)(2) require the following actions:
(j)(1) - To the extent reasonably practicable, the employer shall clean and maintain the workplace in a manner that prevents vermin infestation.
(j)(2) - Where vermin are detected, the employer shall implement and maintain an effective vermin-control program.
OSHA’s proposal and final rule defines “vermin” as including insects, birds, and other animals such as rodents and feral cats, that may create safety and health hazards for employees.
During March 2012, a concern was brought to the Agency with using feral cats as an example in the definition for “vermin,” and suggested removal from the definition.
Subpart F – 1 Year Later(1915.80 - 1915.94)
Guidance Documents•6 developed when published•Recently published – Working Alone Quick Card
Citations Issued – August 2011-2012 – 15 Total•1915.81 Housekeeping•1915.82 Lighting•1915.87 Medical Services and First Aid•1915.89 Lockout/Tags-plus•1915.93 Motor Vehicle Safety Equipment, Operation and Maintenance
Citations Covering 1915.80 - 1915.94
Citations Covering 1915.80 - 1915.94
Citations Covering 1915.80 - 1915.94
Citations Covering 1915.80 - 1915.94
Vertical Tandem Lifts
• Final Rule published 12/10/2008• Lawsuit filed by NMSA on several
points, two were accepted by Court• Court remand of two provisions
– Ban of lifting flatracks in a VTL– Inspections of VTLs from ship to shore
• Next step – issue remand notice• OSHA has several options thereafter
Directorate of Enforcement - Guidance Activity
Longshoring and Marine Terminals “Tool Shed” Directive and Cargo Gear Directive in Agency Clearance•Incorporates SIP III, VTL, PPE Payment, and updates interpretations
Shipyard Employment “Tool Bag” Directive in Agency Clearance•Includes 29 CFR Part 1915, Subpart F - General Working Conditions in Shipyard Employment, published on May 2, 2011•Provides information regarding Settlement Agreement between the SCA and OSHA.
Issues Raised by Marine Chemists
• OSHA Outreach Program• OSHA Jurisdiction• Employers providing first aid to
MC while on site
Outreach Training Program and OSHA Jurisdiction
Outreach Training Limited to OSHA Jurisdiction
•The OSH Act covers private sector employers and their employees in the 50 states and certain territories and jurisdictions under federal authority. •OSHA Outreach Training Program classes limited to training conducted within OSHA's jurisdiction. •Classes delivered outside of OSHA's jurisdiction are not recognized and trainers will not receive student course completion cards for those students.
•An exception exists, with prior OSHA approval, for training that is provided on a contract basis for a specific organization and only its employees.
•The trainer must submit a written request for exception at least 60 days in advance of the scheduled training
http://www.osha.gov/dte/index.html
Outreach Training Program and OSHA Jurisdiction
(cont.)Exception for Training Conducted Outside OSHA Jurisdiction1.Primary authorized trainer
2.Trainer email address
3.Copy of trainer card
4.Outreach class type (indicate industry and number of hours)
5.Contracting organization name and address
6.Start and end times and dates
7.A topic outline which indicates each topic, the length of time each topic will be taught, and the date and time the topic will be taught.
8.Guest trainer name(s)
9.Address where training will be conducted
10.Typed list of employees to be trained on the contracting company letterhead.
Adequate First Aid (1915.87(c)(2))Scenario: A Marine Chemist is told that the
shipyard (Host) will not provide first aid to sub-contractors, or their sub-contractors.
•No accompanied person that is trained in first aid
•Contract person does not have appropriate first aid training
•Facility does not have an onsite clinic or infirmary
•Facility is unwilling to provide first aid services
Adequate First Aid (1915.87(c)(2))Options for Marine Chemists Under the
Following Conditions:1.Should have in the contract that the Sub-Contractor will provide assistance2.Provide their own first aid trained employee and charge appropriately for two employees; and3.Modify their contract to specify that the shipyard must provide first aid.
MACOSH• Five Committee meetings and three site
visits were held under the current charter that include:
• Over 20 conference calls were held between the two workgroups
Meeting Location Dates Site Visit
Washington, DC April 19-20, 2011 None
San Diego, CA July 19-20, 2011 Continental Maritime Shipyard
Portland, ME September 20–21, 2011 Bath Iron Works Shipyard
Washington, DC February 22-23, 2012 None
Seattle, WA July 24-25, 2012 Logging Operation; Fishing vessel/processor
Longshore Workgroup Published Products (2008 -2013)
Document Type & Title Document Information
Traffic Lanes & Personnel Safety Zones OSHA FS-3540 PDF Online Only - English
Working Safely While on the Apron or "Highline" OSHA 3539 - Quick Card
Protecting Mechanics Working on Power Equipment (in the yard at Marine Terminals)
Quick Card
Mechanics Working in the Yard (Marine Cargo Terminals) Quick Card
First Aid In Marine Cargo Handling OSHA 3368 - Quick Card
Gangway Safety in Marine Cargo Handling OSHA 3369 - Quick Card
Lifesaving Facilities in Marine Cargo Handling OSHA 3367 - Quick Card
Roll-on Roll-off (Ro-Ro) Ship and Dock Safety Guidance Document
• 16 additional Longshore items are undergoing development for publication.
Guidance Product Status - Shipyard Workgroup (2008 – 2013)Document Type & Title Document Information
Documents Awaiting Publication
Quick Card: Hot Work on Hollow or Enclosed Structures Quick CardFact Sheet: Hot Work on Hollow or Enclosed Structures Fact SheetFact Sheet: Guidelines for Safe Entry & Cleaning of Sewage Tanks
Fact Sheet
Documents Under DevelopmentConfined Space Development Guidance DocumentPublished DocumentsFact Sheet: Eye Protection Against Radiant Energy OSHA FS-3499
Quick Card: Fire Watch Safety OSHA 3494-2012
Safety and Health Injury Prevention Sheet (SHIPS) - Rigging
Guidance Document
Fall Protection Safety for Commercial Fishing DSG 6/2011 - Fact SheetSafe Work Practices for Shipbreaking OSHA 3375-03
Deck Barge Safety OSHA 3358-01N -
Spud Barge Safety DSG 1/2009 - Fact Sheet
MACOSH Continued
• Current Charter ends January 25, 2013• Solicitation of nominations for members
– Federal Register Notice requesting nominations was published August 2, 2012
– Nominations must be submitted by September 16, 2012
• To apply – www.regulations.gov• Charter renewal process started• Make up of balanced committee
FY 2011Federal OSHA
NEP Enforcement Data
• Note: In some cases, due to the migration of data from IMIS to OIS, FY 2011 and FY 2012 values may be projected.
National Emphasis ProgramsCurrent NEPs
(Evaluating all NEPs from 2007-2009 In
Development
Chemical Facilities
Combustible
Dust
Lead
Food
Flavorings – Diacetyl (expired
1/12)
Nursing Homes
(ergonomic stressors, BBP, Slip, trip, fall,
workplace violence)
Primary Metals
Hex Chrome Silica Trenching Isocyanates (paintings &
coatings industry – truck bed liners)
Amputation Shipbreaking
FY 2011 NEP Inspections Conducted By Type
19
1,742
714517
3,375
557
102 14 6370
66
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
FY 2011 - Percent Total Violations Issued As Serious
(NEP)80%
72%67% 68% 72% 72%
78%
57%
50%
67%
46%
72%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
FY 2011 - Average Current Penalty Per Serious Violation
(NEP)$4,863
$2,270
$1,781 $1,839 $1,957$2,190
$3,687
$1,396
$2,000$1,943
$2,345$2,133
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
2010- $10002011 - $2132
OSHA’s Penalty Policy
• October 1, 2010: Deployment of administrative enhancements
• FY 2011: Monitored the new policy
• April 1, 2012: Increased the employer size reduction factor for employers with 1 – 25 employees from 40% to 60%
FY 2008 – FY 2012 (Oct-Dec)
Federal OSHA Maritime Enforcement Data
•Prepared February 22, 2012
•Due to migration from IMIS to OIS, data may be incomplete at this time.
Total Maritime Inspections
309340
301 299
35
0
100
200
300
400
500
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
Inspection Types% Programmed vs. %
Unprogrammed75%
25%
82%
18%
80%
20%
76%
24%
74%
26%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
% Programmed % Unprogrammed
Percent Inspections In-Compliance
31%26% 24% 23% 23%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
Fatality Investigations
11
8
12
8
3
0
5
10
15
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
Total Violations Issued
744
852756 777
153
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
% Violations Issued as Serious
64% 63%69%
63% 60%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
Avg. Current Penalty Per Serious Violation
$994$892 $969
$2,104 $1,991
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
FY 2011Top 10 Most Frequently Cited
Standards in Maritime Industry1. Electrical, Wiring
Methods2. Respiratory
Protection3. Hazard
Communication4. Electrical, General
Requirements5. First Aid &
Lifesaving Facilities
6. Electrical, Wiring Design & Protection
7. Powered Industrial Trucks
8. Abrasive Wheel Machinery
9. Testing for Entering Confined Spaces
10.Guarding of Edges
FY 2012Top 10 Most Cited
Standards(General Industry)1. Hazard
Communication2. Respiratory
Protection3. Electrical,
Wiring Methods4. Powered
Industrial Trucks5. Lockout/Tagout
6. Electrical, General Requirements
7. Machine Guarding8. Personal Protective
Equipment9. Recordkeeping,
Forms10.Guarding Floor &
Wall Openings & Holes
IMIS only
FY 2012 Top 10 Most Cited
Standards(Construction Industry)1. Fall Protection
2. Scaffolding3. Ladders4. Fall Protection,
Training Requirements
5. Hazard Communication
6. Head Protection7. Eye & Face
Protection8. Aerial Lifts9. Electrical,
Wiring Methods10.Excavation,
Specific Excavation Requirements
IMIS only
Amy Wangdahl, CSP
Director, Office of Maritime &
Agriculture
Directorate of Standards and Guidance
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
202-693-2066