oropharyngeal complications of using laryngeal mask airway-case series

1

Click here to load reader

Upload: priya-shah

Post on 06-Jul-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Oropharyngeal complications of using laryngeal mask airway-case series

BioMed Central

Page 1 of 1(page number not for citation purposes)

Head & Neck Oncology

Open AccessPoster presentationOropharyngeal complications of using laryngeal mask airway-case seriesPriya Shah, Farai Nhembe, Colin Hopper and Tahwinder Upile*

Address: Head & Neck Unit, University College London Hospitals, London, UK

* Corresponding author

IntroductionThe reinforced Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) is nowincreasingly being used for head and neck procedures.However, their use is not without complications andattendant morbidity. We report three cases of postopera-tive sore throat due to severe pharyngeal trauma followingthe use of a reinforced LMA.

Series reportIn the first and second cases, a 27-year-old male and a 56-year-old male underwent septoplasty, submucosal dia-thermy to inferior turbinates and bilateral antral wash-outs. While in the third case, a 44-year-old-femaleunderwent bilateral temporomandibular joint arthros-copy and arthrocentesis.

Size 4 LMA was used in all cases. No throat pack was used.Each procedure took less than an hour. A plastic Yankauersucker was used under direct vision to clear the supraglot-tis and the posterior pharynx of retained secretions andblood. The LMA was then removed by the anaesthetist onrecovery of the patient.

Postoperatively the patients complained of a severe sorethroat with evidence of significant palatal abrasions anduvular swelling on examination. On later review the sorethroat was reported to have lasted around 5–10 days. Atthe six week outpatient review, all patients reported fullrecovery with no visible evidence of residual palatal oruvular scarring or other anaesthetic sequelae.

ConclusionLMAs are useful and occasionally life saving airwaysadjuncts but are not without complications. Both the sur-geon and anaesthetist should recognise and ensuretrauma is minimised to the oropharynx during all stagesof surgery.

from 1st Scientific Meeting of the Head and Neck Optical Diagnostics SocietyLondon, UK. 14 March 2009

Published: 28 July 2009

Head & Neck Oncology 2009, 1(Suppl 1):P23 doi:10.1186/1758-3284-1-S1-P23

<supplement> <title> <p>1<sup>st </sup>Scientific Meeting of the Head and Neck Optical Diagnostics Society</p> </title> <editor>Colin Hopper, Adel K El-Naggar, Tahwinder Upile, Waseem Jerjes and HJCM Sterenborg</editor> <sponsor> <note>Publication of this supplement was made possible with support from KARL STORZ Endoskope</note> </sponsor> <note>Meeting abstracts – A single PDF containing all abstracts in this Supplement is available <a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/files/pdf/1758-3284-1-S1-full.pdf">here</a>.</note> <url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1758-3284-1-S1-info.pdf</url> </supplement>

This abstract is available from: http://www.headandneckoncology.org/content/1/S1/P23

© 2009 Shah et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.