orifice calibration

16
Orifice Calibration: Two Phase Small Air BY: JESSICA CATLIN, DYLAN HELM , AND YEN NGUYEN

Upload: yen-nguyen

Post on 11-Apr-2017

57 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Orifice Calibration

Orifice Calibration:

Two Phase Small AirBY: JESSICA CATLIN, DYLAN HELM , AND YEN NGUYEN

Page 2: Orifice Calibration

Objective

Orifice Flow Calibration Future Experiments Develop Model

Flow Ranges (0-0.3 SCFM) a=0.0575, b=0.592

Testing

Page 3: Orifice Calibration

Equipment

Gas Flow Meter Zero and Range Screws

Control Valve

Page 4: Orifice Calibration

EHS&LP

Air

Leaks

Water in Line

Pressure Regulation

Page 5: Orifice Calibration

Data Model

Constant is unit conversion from (L/min) to (SCFM) 294.11= standard temperature (K) 101.3= standard pressure (kPa)

Page 6: Orifice Calibration

Process Model

Horizontal pipe, steady state, inviscid, and incompressible

Notice Standard Flow

Page 7: Orifice Calibration

Uncertainty

Variables with uncertainty

Page 8: Orifice Calibration

Expectations

Square root model

Unknown constant a is positive

Unknown constant b is close to 0.5

Average residual close to zero 0 2 4 6 8 10 120

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

Expected Plot of Q vs. (i-io)

i-io

Q

Page 9: Orifice Calibration

Experimental Plan

Open necessary valves

Set pressure regulators

Adjust zero () and range Flow must be turned off for zero

Attach the flow meter

Set valve at random operating %

Record the current (i)

Page 10: Orifice Calibration

Experimental Plan (cont.)

Measure (), T, and P 1 minute interval Repeat fifteen times

Plug data into spreadsheet

Determine a and b using solver

Plug model into NI LabVIEW

Test the model 9 trials

Page 11: Orifice Calibration

Data Run Experimental Flow (Liters) Time (min) Actual Flow (L/min) Temperature (°C) Pressure (kPa) Standard Flow (SCFM) Current (mA) i-io (mA) Modeled Flow Rate Q (ACFM) Squared Deviation

13 0.92 1 0.92 21.5 108.3 0.035 4 0.8 0.050 0.000246701

1 1.55 1 1.55 21 108.8 0.059 4.8 1.6 0.076 0.000294121

7 2.4 1 2.40 21.5 108.8 0.091 5.1 1.9 0.084 4.63685E-05

10 2.65 1 2.65 21.5 108.8 0.100 5.3 2.1 0.089 0.00012422

5 2.59 1 2.59 21.5 110.3 0.099 5.6 2.4 0.097 8.33137E-06

11 2.5 1 2.50 21.5 108.8 0.095 5.7 2.5 0.099 1.7948E-05

8 3.32 1 3.32 21.5 109.1 0.126 6 2.8 0.106 0.000412202

2 3.2 1 3.20 21.5 109.3 0.122 6.3 3.1 0.112 8.83274E-05

3 3.18 1 3.18 21.5 110.1 0.122 7.7 4.5 0.140 0.000331658

6 4.2 1 4.20 21.5 109.2 0.160 8.5 5.3 0.154 2.82703E-05

15 4.79 1 4.79 21.5 109.6 0.183 11 7.8 0.194 0.000126736

12 5.78 1 5.78 21.5 108.8 0.219 14.3 11.1 0.239 0.000406417

9 7.75 1 7.75 21.5 109 0.294 16.4 13.2 0.265 0.000850742

14 7.72 1 7.72 21.5 109.8 0.295 17.7 14.5 0.280 0.000225965

4 7.52 1 7.52 21.5 110.2 0.288 20.1 16.9 0.307 0.000329187

Sum of Squared Deviations 0.003537195

Solution:a= 0.057506788b= 0.59197892

Page 12: Orifice Calibration

Results

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 180

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35Q vs. (i-io)

ModelExperiment

(i-io)

Q

Data Model Testing Q modeled

(SCFM) Q measured (L/min) Pressure (KPa) Temperature (K) Q measured

(SCFM)Percent Error

(%)0.073 4.290 108.8 294.5 0.084317629 -15.50.072 4.280 108.8 294.5 0.084121084 -16.80.075 4.350 108.8 294.5 0.085496896 -14.00.083 4.940 109.3 294.5 0.097539227 -17.50.109 6.000 108.8 294.5 0.117926754 -8.20.105 5.910 108.8 294.5 0.116157852 -10.60.169 9.150 108.8 294.5 0.179838299 -6.40.176 8.700 108.8 294.5 0.170993793 2.80.166 8.41 108.8 294.5 0.165294 0.4

Page 13: Orifice Calibration

Statistical Test Results

Taken from Google Images

Statistical Test: Two-tailed t-test Null Hypothesis = 0r ̄

Alternative Hypothesis ≠r ̄ 0 Significance level α = 0.05 (95% confidence level )

Mean of Residuals ( )r ̄ Sample Standard Deviation (sr)

Number of random samples (N)

Test Statistics (t)

0.061217 0.0577 15 0.0781

Data from Student's t-Distribution Table Two-tails (P-value)

0.50.5 < p-value < 1.0

1Degree of freedom (14) 0.692 0.0781 0

Page 14: Orifice Calibration

Discussion

2σ = 0.03

Propagation of UncertaintyεV1 (L) εV2 (L) εt1 (min) εt2 (min) εPatm (kPA) εPgage (kPA) εT (ᵒC)

0.2 0.2 0.016666667 0.016666667 1 1 1

dQ/dV1 dQ/dV2 dQ/dt1 dQ/dt2 dQ/dPatm dQ/dPgage dQ/dT Error (95%)-0.0379 0.0379 0.0348 -0.0348 0.00032 0.00032 -0.00012 0.00860-0.0381 0.0381 0.0591 -0.0591 0.00054 0.00054 -0.0002 0.00872-0.0381 0.0381 0.0913 -0.0913 0.00084 0.00084 -0.00031 0.00884-0.0381 0.0381 0.1008 -0.1008 0.00093 0.00093 -0.00034 0.00888-0.0386 0.0386 0.0999 -0.0999 0.00091 0.00091 -0.00034 0.00899-0.0381 0.0381 0.0951 -0.0951 0.00087 0.00087 -0.00032 0.00885-0.0382 0.0382 0.1267 -0.1267 0.00116 0.00116 -0.00043 0.00906-0.0382 0.0382 0.1223 -0.1223 0.00112 0.00112 -0.00042 0.00905-0.0385 0.0385 0.1225 -0.1225 0.00111 0.00111 -0.00042 0.00911-0.0382 0.0382 0.1604 -0.1604 0.00147 0.00147 -0.00054 0.00932-0.0383 0.0383 0.1836 -0.1836 0.00168 0.00168 -0.00062 0.00954-0.0381 0.0381 0.2199 -0.2199 0.00202 0.00202 -0.00075 0.00985-0.0381 0.0381 0.2954 -0.2954 0.00271 0.00271 -0.001 0.01075-0.0384 0.0384 0.2965 -0.2965 0.00270 0.00270 -0.00101 0.01080-0.0385 0.0385 0.2898 -0.2898 0.00263 0.00263 -0.00098 0.01074

Average Error (95%) 0.00941

Page 15: Orifice Calibration

Conclusion

Unknown Errors

Volume Measurements

Longer Time Intervals

Operating Limits

Page 16: Orifice Calibration

Orifice Calibration: Two Phase Small AirJESSICA CATLIN, DYLAN HELM, AND YEN NGUYEN

Questions?