organic light emitting diodes: display and lighting ... · pdf fileorganic light emitting...

Download Organic Light Emitting Diodes: Display and Lighting ... · PDF fileOrganic Light Emitting Diodes: Display and Lighting Technology of the Future Karl Leo Institut für Angewandte Photophysik,

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: lenhan

Post on 07-Feb-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Organic Light Emitting Diodes: Display and Lighting Technology of the Future

    Karl LeoInstitut fr Angewandte Photophysik, TU Dresden, and Fraunhofer-Institute fr Photonische Mikrosysteme, Dresden

  • Motivation: What is possible with OLED:

    Samsung 40 TV display

  • Organic Semiconductors

    Photovoltaic cellsOrganic materials Integrated circuits

    Large area & flexible substrates possible

    Large variety of materials

    Low cost

  • Small-Molecules

    Organic semiconductors: Two variants

    Polymers

    Technology: Spin-On Technology: Evaporation

  • pzpz

    sp2 sp2

    p lane of thesp 2-orb ita ls

    pz-orb ita l -bond

    -bond

    -bond

    pz-orb ita l

    The basics of organic semiconductors:Conjugated -electron systems

    Sp2-hybridised Carbon:

  • de loka lis ie rte E lektronen

    pz

    sp2

    6 x

    18 x

    LUMO (*) => EC conduction band

    HOMO () => EV valence band

    -electron systems delocalize!

    VdW crystals small -overlap, narrow bands saturated electron system

    delocalized-electrons

    Molecules with conjugated -electron system

    Technology: vapor deposition

  • Device energy diagram

    E

    x

    Cathode

    LUMO

    HOMO

    Anode

    Device structure

    V

    A

    Light emission

    Organic Light Emitting Diodes

    OLEDs: Basic Principles

    Glass substrate

    Transparent anode

    Emissive layer

    Cathode

    ++ +

    ---300nm

  • Organics Collaboration Dresden

    Institut frAngewandte Photophysik

    IAPP, University of Dresden (www.iapp.de, approx. 40 people)

    Basic research on novel device concepts

    Low-voltage OLED

    Fraunhofer-IPMS Dresden (www.ipms.fraunhofer.de, approx. 25 people)

    Process development with highly efficient OLEDs

    OLED-Inline-deposition set-up (30x40cm Substrate)

    Driving Electronic for OLED-Displays

    Small to medium volume fabrication

    Novaled GmbH (www.novaled.com, approx. 45 people)

    Highly efficient OLED-stacks for RGB-Displays

    Technology licensing

  • Exponential current-voltage relation

    Flat-band under operation

    Low work-function contacts not needed !

    p n

    Why doped transport layers:Inorganic vs. Organic LED

    Inorganic LED (e.g., GaAs/AlGaAs) Organic LED

    CB

    VB

    EFe

    EFh

    Metal

    space charge limited currents

    low work function metals neededITO-preparation necessary

    HTLETL

  • Double emission layer (D-EML) structure

    D-EML structure

    Al

    BPhen:Cs

    BPhen

    TAZ:Ir(ppy)3

    TCTA:Ir(ppy)3Spiro-TAD

    MeO-TPD:F4-TCNQ

    ITO substrate

    n-doped ETL

    HBL

    PET-EML

    PHT-EML

    EBL

    p-doped HTL

    p-H

    TL

    EB

    L

    HB

    L

    EM

    L2

    ITO

    Al

    n-E

    TL

    EM

    L1

    Self-balancing EML system no charge accumulation at interfaces

    X. Zhou et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 4070 (2002)

  • 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.210

    100

    1,000

    10,000

    Lum

    inan

    ce (c

    d/m

    2 )

    Voltage (V)

    1,000 cd/m2 @ 2.9V61.5 cd/A; 67 lm/W

    100 cd/m2 @ 2.68V64 cd/A; 75 lm/W

    Highly efficient & stable PIN Triplet OLED:World record in efficiency

    G. He et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 3911 (2004)

    Highly efficient devices are also most stable devices

    Efficiency higher than for best green nitride LED

  • Lifetime of PIN-OLEDs

    OLEDAsia Seoul 2005

    Current status:phosphorescent red (0.68, 0.32):100,000 h at 500 cd/mphosphorescent green (0.38, 0.59): 25,000h at 500 cd/m (Irppy3 based)fluorescent blue (0.15, 0.17): 6,000 h at 500 cd/m

    Novaled pin-OLEDs have reached state of the art lifetimes for emitter systems in all three colors samples still contain Cs as n-dopant

    100 1.000 10.000

    1.000

    10.000

    100.000

    1.000.000

    Life

    time

    / h

    Luminance / cd/m2

    200,000 h @ 150 cd/m2

    30,000 h @ 500 cd/m2

    8,000 h @ 1000 cd/m2

    n = 1.7

    Red triplet pin OLED

  • OLEDFAB Project

    OLEDFAB Projekt iniated by Thomson und BMWA/SMWA

    Novaled leads Saxonian consortium with IPMS und IAPP

    Goals: - Demo of a 5 inch active-matrive display with highly efficient pin technology- Display manufactured using novel inline technology

    Other partners: - Applied Films - Labor fr Bildschirmtechnik Stuttgart- Deutsche Thomson Brandt

  • Full color AM display based on pin technology

    Performance:

    operating voltage for 100cd/m2: around 7V (OLED + backplane)

    power consumption:240mW@100cd/m2 (in forwarddirection only, video mode)

    about 60% of equivalent LCD display

    Active matrix OLED made in joint project by ITRI (Taiwan), Thomson (France) and Novaled

    Panel emitting in both directions on n-channel LTPS backplane (3.25, QVGA, 130dpi) based on PIN structure

    OLEDFAB: Display with improved backplane in preparation

  • Even higher Light Efficiencies: out-coupling enhancement

    OLEDAsia Seoul 2005

    Efficiency at 1000 cd/m: 110 lm/W (with outcoupling enhancement)

    Novaled focuses on furtherimprovement of their recordbreaking efficiencies byout-coupling enhancements(target 2005: 140lm/W)

    10 100 1000 100000

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    Pow

    er e

    ffici

    ency

    (lm

    /W)

    Luminance (cd/m)

    Green phosphorescent PIN OLEDwith outcoupling enhancement

  • Institut fr Angewandte PhotophysikTechnische Universitt Dresden

    LED performance vs. time

    1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    OLED white Red Filtered

    Tungsten Bulb (unfiltered)

    Fluorescent Lamp

    InGaNgreen

    OLED

    PLED

    AlInGaP Red/Yellow

    Pow

    er E

    ffici

    ency

    (Lum

    en/W

    att)

    Year

    Dresden leading in both RGB and white

  • OLED Lighting Applications

    source: Philips Lighting March 2004 GE demonstrator

    Signage General lighting

  • Technology Roadmap (USDC)(Diffuse lighting)

  • OLLA project

    OLLA EU 6th Framework Integrated Project initiated by Philips

    OLLA: Organic LED for Lighting Applications

    Aims:- Highly Efficient white OLED- Large Area OLED- Low-Cost manufacturing

    Other German partners: - Siemens-Osram, Aixtron, Covion, HCStarck, Syntec, Novaled- FhG-IPMS, TU Dresden, Uni Kassel

    about 15 further partners from other European Universities

  • Achieve Smooth Transition from R&D to production: Close Collaboration of Fraunhofer Society and Industry

    Topics: OLED for Displays and LightingOrganic Solar CellsMemory and other Applications

    Tools: - Gen 2 Inline Pilot Production Tool (Displays&Lighting)- Reel-to-Reel R&D tool

    Location: New IPMS cleanroom: Virtually no building investment

    A new Initiative: Center for Organic Materials and Electronic Devices Dresden (COMEDD)

  • Outline of COMEDD

    Investment by FhG/state of saxony

    Operations organized in projects

    Projects are defined by advisory committee

    OLED foundry does pilot manufacturing

    Projects Tools

    Inline Reel-to-Reel Manufacturing Manufacturing

    Center for Organic Materials and Electronic Devices Dresden (COMEDD)

    Advisory BoardFunding agencies,

    FhG, Industry

    COMEDD Operations

    Funding agencies:SaxonyBMBF, EC

    OLED Foundry

  • OLED have still a long way to go, but

    Lifetime problem is close to being solved even for demanding applications

    Efficiency: OLED displays: will beat all other FPDs OLED lighting: should be able to surpass fluorescent tube

    COMEDD: New initiative to establish OLED manufacturing in Saxony

    Conclusions

  • Acknowledgment

    M. Pfeiffer, J. Blochwitz-Nimoth, G. He, G. Schwartz, K. Fehse, K. Walzer X. Zhou, J. Huang, A. Werner, A. Nollau, J. Drechsel, B. Mnnig, K. Harada, T. Fritz, B. Plnnigs, A. Beyer

    J. Amelung, W. Jeroch, C. May, M. Schreil, M. Toerker, U. Todt (FhG-IPMS)

    D. Alloway, P.A. Lee, N. Armstrong, Tucson (XPS/UPS) N. Karl (Stuttgart) D. Whrle (Bremen), J. Salbeck (Kassel), H. Hartmann (Merseburg) C.J. Bloom, M. K. Elliott (CSU)

    BMBF, SMWA, SMWK, DFG, EC, FCI, NEDO