organic-inorganic hybrid light-emitting composites: poly(p-phenylene vinylene) intercalated clay...

3
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE LETTERS 18 (1 9 9 9 ) 1539 – 1541 Organic-inorganic hybrid light-emitting composites: Poly(p-phenylene vinylene) intercalated clay nanoparticles B. WINKLER, L. DAI, A. W.-H. MAU CSIRO Molecular Science, Bag 10, Clayton South, Victoria 3169, Australia E-mail: [email protected] Poly( p-phenylene vinylene) (PPV) and its derivatives have been intensively studied since the first report on polymeric light emitting diodes (LEDs) in 1990 [1]. Owing to their relatively high photo-/electro- luminescence (PL/EL) quantum efficiencies [2] and good color tunability through molecular engineering [3], PPV and its derivatives are among the most attractive materials for EL applications [4–7]. We have recently prepared PPV derivatives substituted with oligo(ethylene oxide) side chains (EO-PPVs) [8] for use in both LEDs and light emitting elec- trochemical cells (LECs) [9, 10]. It was found that the covalent linkages between the EO and PPV con- stituents can effectively minimize the phase separation problem often associated with conventional LEC de- vices based on mixtures of conjugate light-emitting polymers (e.g. poly[2-methoxy-5-(2 0 -ethyl-hexyloxy)- p-phenylene vinylene], MEH-PPV) and polymeric ion conductors (e.g. poly(ethylene oxide), PEO) [9–11]. Organic-inorganic hybrid composites constitute a new class of materials, which could show properties characteristic of both constituent components with po- tential synergetic effects [12–14]. In this context, cer- tain electroluminescent organic-inorganic hybrid ma- terials have been prepared by sol-gel chemistry [15– 18] while various polymers including poly(ethylene oxides) [19, 20], poly(olefines) [21], polyimide [22], polypyrrole [23], and polyaniline [24] have been in- corporated into clay particles through either a solution or a melt intercalation process [19, 25]. The organic- inorganic hybrid composites thus prepared have been demonstrated to show improved environmental stabil- ity, mechanical strength, and lower permeability for gases (e.g., O 2 ) with respect to corresponding pure polymers [15–25]. In this letter, we report the first solu- tion intercalation of EO 3 -PPV into clay nanoparticles for light-emitting applications. The molecular structure of EO 3 -PPV and the intercalation process are schemat- ically shown in Scheme 1a and b, respectively. The synthesis and characterization of poly[1,4- (2,5-bis(1,4,7,10-tetraoxaundecyl))phenylenevinylene] (EO 3 -PPV) has been described in detail elsewhere [8]. The polymer sample used in this study has a weight- average molecular weight M w = 220000 g/mol and molecular weight distribution index M w / M n = 1.8. An organically-modified smectic clay (Bentone 34, B34, from Rheox), consisting of multilayers of negatively charged silicate sheets (<800 × 800 ×2.5 nm) com- pensated by organic-cations (e.g. dimethyldioctadecyl ammonium) homogeneously distributed within the clay galleries, was used for the solution-intercalation of EO 3 -PPV. In a typical experiment, 160 mg B34 was added to a homogeneous solution of 16 mg EO 3 -PPV in 2 mL CHCl 3 and the mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature. The resulting polymer-clay com- posites were characterized by various spectroscopic techniques after having been thoroughly rinsed with pure CHCl 3 and dried in vacuum at ca. 50 C until a constant weight was obtained. The total polymer loading for each of the samples was calculated by its weight grain and cross-checked by thermal gravimetric analyses (TGA, Mettler TG50). Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) was carried out on an X-ray spectrometer Rigaku I (CuK α , λ = 0.154 nm). Ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) measurements were made on a Cary 5E UV/VIS/NIR spectrophoto- meter. PL spectroscopy was recorded on a luminesce- nce spectrometer SL 50 (Perkin-Elmer). EL emissions were measured by an EG&G Model 1460 optical mul- tichannel analyzer and the corresponding diode char- acteristics were determined using a Hewlett-Packard 6113A DC power supply coupled with a Fluke 45 Dual Display Multimeter. All above measurements were made under ambient conditions (20 C). Fig. 1 shows the XRD profiles for B34 before and after the polymer intercalation. As the intercalation proceeded, a steady increase in the height of the clay galleries from ca. 2.89 nm (B34) to ca. 3.69 nm (61% Figure 1 Powder X-ray diffraction data collected for EO 3 -PPV inter- calated B34 nanoparticles with different percentage contents of the polymer. 0261–8028 C 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers 1539

Upload: b-winkler

Post on 02-Aug-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE LETTERS18 (1999 )1539– 1541

Organic-inorganic hybrid light-emitting composites: Poly(p-phenylene

vinylene) intercalated clay nanoparticles

B. WINKLER, L. DAI , A. W.-H. MAUCSIRO Molecular Science, Bag 10, Clayton South, Victoria 3169, AustraliaE-mail: [email protected]

Poly(p-phenylene vinylene) (PPV) and its derivativeshave been intensively studied since the first reporton polymeric light emitting diodes (LEDs) in 1990[1]. Owing to their relatively high photo-/electro-luminescence (PL/EL) quantum efficiencies [2] andgood color tunability through molecular engineering[3], PPV and its derivatives are among the mostattractive materials for EL applications [4–7]. Wehave recently prepared PPV derivatives substitutedwith oligo(ethylene oxide) side chains (EO-PPVs)[8] for use in both LEDs and light emitting elec-trochemical cells (LECs) [9, 10]. It was found thatthe covalent linkages between the EO and PPV con-stituents can effectively minimize the phase separationproblem often associated with conventional LEC de-vices based on mixtures of conjugate light-emittingpolymers (e.g. poly[2-methoxy-5-(2′-ethyl-hexyloxy)-p-phenylene vinylene], MEH-PPV) and polymeric ionconductors (e.g. poly(ethylene oxide), PEO) [9–11].

Organic-inorganic hybrid composites constitute anew class of materials, which could show propertiescharacteristic of both constituent components with po-tential synergetic effects [12–14]. In this context, cer-tain electroluminescent organic-inorganic hybrid ma-terials have been prepared by sol-gel chemistry [15–18] while various polymers including poly(ethyleneoxides) [19, 20], poly(olefines) [21], polyimide [22],polypyrrole [23], and polyaniline [24] have been in-corporated into clay particles through either a solutionor a melt intercalation process [19, 25]. The organic-inorganic hybrid composites thus prepared have beendemonstrated to show improved environmental stabil-ity, mechanical strength, and lower permeability forgases (e.g., O2) with respect to corresponding purepolymers [15–25]. In this letter, we report the first solu-tion intercalation of EO3-PPV into clay nanoparticlesfor light-emitting applications. The molecular structureof EO3-PPV and the intercalation process are schemat-ically shown in Scheme 1a and b, respectively.

The synthesis and characterization of poly[1,4-(2,5-bis(1,4,7,10-tetraoxaundecyl))phenylene vinylene](EO3-PPV) has been described in detail elsewhere [8].The polymer sample used in this study has a weight-average molecular weightMw= 220000 g/mol andmolecular weight distribution indexMw/Mn= 1.8. Anorganically-modified smectic clay (Bentone 34, B34,from Rheox), consisting of multilayers of negativelycharged silicate sheets (<800× 800×2.5 nm) com-pensated by organic-cations (e.g. dimethyldioctadecyl

ammonium) homogeneously distributed within theclay galleries, was used for the solution-intercalationof EO3-PPV. In a typical experiment, 160 mg B34 wasadded to a homogeneous solution of 16 mg EO3-PPVin 2 mL CHCl3 and the mixture was stirred overnightat room temperature. The resulting polymer-clay com-posites were characterized by various spectroscopictechniques after having been thoroughly rinsed withpure CHCl3 and dried in vacuum at ca. 50◦C untila constant weight was obtained. The total polymerloading for each of the samples was calculated by itsweight grain and cross-checked by thermal gravimetricanalyses (TGA, Mettler TG50).

Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) was carried outon an X-ray spectrometer Rigaku I (CuKα, λ =0.154 nm). Ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) measurementswere made on a Cary 5E UV/VIS/NIR spectrophoto-meter. PL spectroscopy was recorded on a luminesce-nce spectrometer SL 50 (Perkin-Elmer). EL emissionswere measured by an EG&G Model 1460 optical mul-tichannel analyzer and the corresponding diode char-acteristics were determined using a Hewlett-Packard6113A DC power supply coupled with a Fluke 45 DualDisplay Multimeter. All above measurements weremade under ambient conditions (20◦C).

Fig. 1 shows the XRD profiles for B34 before andafter the polymer intercalation. As the intercalationproceeded, a steady increase in the height of the claygalleries from ca. 2.89 nm (B34) to ca. 3.69 nm (61%

Figure 1 Powder X-ray diffraction data collected for EO3-PPV inter-calated B34 nanoparticles with different percentage contents of thepolymer.

0261–8028 C© 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers 1539

Figure 2 Photoluminescent emissions from the EO3-PPV intercalatedB34 nanoparticles at different intercalation levels (λEX= 475 nm), 22%(——); 8% (· · · · · ·); 0.5% (- - -). The inset shows the dependence of thePL peak position (λmax) on the polymer content.

EO3-PPV in B34) was observed, as indicated by thecorresponding shift of the (0 0 1) diffraction peak from2θ = 3.05 to 2.39◦. This was accompanied by a colorchange of the polymer-intercalated clay nanoparticlesfrom yellow (0.5% EO3-PPV) to red luminescent (>5%EO3-PPV). The PL spectra of the composites are givenin Fig. 2. As can be seen, the PL emission shows a red-shift with increasing intercalation level. Included in theinset of Fig. 2 is the dependence of the PL peak position(λmax) on the polymer content, which shows that theλmax continuously increases with increasing polymercontent to a limiting value of ca. 610 nm, characteristicof EO3-PPV [8], at ca. 20% (w/w), then, remains un-changed despite further intercalation. The above fea-tures could be attributed to an intercalation-inducedconformational transition from a “compact coil” to “ex-panded coil” (See Scheme 1b) [26–28], which shouldlead to an increase in the effective conjugation length.Luminescent color tuning by adjusting the length ofπ -conjugated segments has been previously demonstrated[29, 30]. Therefore, the intercalation provides an addi-

Scheme 1(a) Molecular structure of EO3-PPV. (b) A schematic repre-sentation of the intercalation process.

Figure 3 Electroluminescent emissions from a single layer LED devicewith the structure ITO/EO3-PPV-B34(0.95 : 0.05)/Al. The inset showsthe corresponding current-voltage (I-V) characteristics of the LED de-vice.

tional means for PL/EL color tuning associated withthe organic-inorganic hybrid composites.

Our preliminary results from a single layer LED de-vicewith thestructure ITO/EO3-PPV-B34 (0.95 : 0.05)/Al showed a similar EL spectrum (λmax= 590 nm,Fig. 3) to the PL emission. As expected, the similar-ity between the EL and PL emissions suggested thatthe same singlet excitons were generated upon both thePL- and EL-excitation [4–7]. Furthermore, the LEDshowed a typical diode characteristic with a turn-onvoltage of ca. 8 V at the forward bias (Inset of Fig. 3).These results indicate that the organic-inorganic hy-brid composites based on EO-PPVs intercalated claynanoparticles may be a class of very promising newmaterials of good color-tunability and environmentalstability for both the PL and EL applications.

AcknowledgmentsThe financial support of theAustrian Science Fund,Vienna, for B.W. is gratefully acknowledged (FWFProject J-1426-CHE). We also thank Ms. Shirley Shen,Dr. Y. B. Cheng, and Dr. G. Simon at the Departmentof Materials Engineering, Monash University, Clayton,for assistance in XRD spectroscopy.

References1. J. H. B U R R O U G H E S, D. D. C. B R A D L E Y , A . R.

B R O W N, R. N. M A R K S, K . M A C K A Y , R. H. F R I E N D,P. L . B U R N S andA . B. H O L M E S, Nature347(1990) 539.

2. D. R. B A I G E N T, A . B. H O L M E S, S. C. M O R A T T I andR. H. F R I E N D, Synth. Met. 80 (1996) 119.

3. P. L . B U R N, A . K R A F T , D. R. B A I G E N T, D. D.C. B R A D L E Y , A . R. B R O W N, R. H. F R I E N D, R. W.G Y M E R, A . B. H O L M E S andR. W. J A C K S O N, J. Amer.Chem. Soc. 115(1993) 10117.

4. N. C. G R E E N H A M andR. H. F R I E N D, Solid State Phys. 49(1995) 1.

5. A . K R A F T , A . C. G R I M S D A L E and A . B. H O L M E S,Angew, Chem. Int. Ed. 37 (1998) 402.

6. L . D A I , J. Macromol. Sci., Rev. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 39(2)(1999) 273.

7. R. H. F R I E N D, R. W. G Y M E R, A . B. H O L M E S, J. H.B U R R O U G H E S, R. N. M A R K S, C. T A L I A N I , D . D. C.B R A D L E Y , D. A . D O S S A N T O S, J. L . B RE D A S , M.L O G D L U N D and W. R. S A L A N E C K , Nature397(1999) 121.

1540

8. B. W I N K L E R , L . D A I and A. W. H. M A U , Chem. Mater. 11(1999) 704.

9. Q. P E I , G. Y U , C. Z H A N G , Y . Y A N G and A. J. H E E G E R ,

Science269(1995) 1086.

10. S. T A S C H , L. H O L Z E R , F. P. W E N Z L , J. G A O , B.W I N K L E R , L . D A I , A . W. H. M A U , R . S O T G I U , M.S A M P I E T R O , G. L E I S I N G and A. J. H E E G E R ,Synth. Met.

(in press).

11. Q. P E I , Y. Y A N G , G. Y U , C. Z H A N G and A. J. H E E G E R ,

J. Amer. Chem. Soc.118(1996) 3922.

12. G. A . O Z I N , Adv. Mater.4(10) (1992) 612.

13. J. H. F E N D L E R and F. C. M E L D R U M , Adv. Mater.7(7) (1995)

607.

14. J. E. M A R K , C . Y .-C. L E E and P. A . B I A N C O N I (eds.),

“Hybrid Organic-Inorganic Composites” (ACS Symp. Ser. 585, ACS

Washington, DC, 1995).

15. W. P. C H A N G and W.-T. W H A N G , Polymer37 (1996) 4229.

16. T. D. D E M O R A I S , F. C H A P U T , K. L A H L I L and J. -P.B O I L O T , Adv. Mater.11 (1999) 107.

17. L. D. C A R L O S , V. D E Z E A B E R M U D E Z , R. A .SA F E R R E I R A , L. M A R Q U E S and M. A S S U N CA O , Chem.

Mater.11 (1999) 581.

18. C. J. B R I N K E R and G. S C H E R R E R(eds.), “Sol-Gel Science:

Physics and Chemistry of Sol-gel Processing” (Academic Press, San Diego,

CA, 1989).

19. P. A R A N D A and E. R U I Z-H I T Z K Y , Chem. Mater. 4 (1992) 1395.

20. E. R U I Z-H I T Z K Y and P. A R A N D O , Adv. Mater.2 (1990) 545.

21. S. A . J O H N S O N , E. S. B R I G H A M , P. J. O L L I V I E R and

T. E. M A L L O U K , Chem. Mater.9 (1997) 2448.

22. K. Y A N O , A . U S U K I and A. O K A D A , J. Polym. Sci. A: Polym.

Chem.35 (1997) 2289.

23. K. R A M A C H A N D R A N and M. M . L E R N E R , J. Electrochem.

Soc.144(1997) 3739.

24. K. A . C A R R A D O and L. X U , Chem. Mater.10 (1998) 1440.

25. E. R U I Z-H I T Z K Y , Adv. Mater.5(5) (1993) 334.

26. L. D A I and J. W. W H I T E , Eur. Polym. J. 30 (1994) 1443.

27. A. G. M A C D I A R M I D and A . J. E P S T E I N ,Synth. Met.69(1995)

85.

28. L. D A I , J. L U , B . M A T T H E W S and A. W. H. M A U , J. Phys.

Chem.102B(1998) 4049.

29. G. G. M A L L I A R A S , J . K . H E R R E M A , J. W I L D E M A N ,

R. H. W I E R I N G A , R. E. G I L L , S. S. L A M P O U R A and G.H A D Z I I O A N N O U , Adv. Mater.10 (1993) 721.

30. A. H I B E R E R , P. F. V A N H U T T E N , J. W I L D E M A N and G.H A D Z I I O A N N O U , Macromol. Chem. Phys.198(1997) 2211.

Received 2 Apriland accepted 26 May 1999

1541