ordination pdf
TRANSCRIPT
8/2/2019 Ordination PDF
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ordination-pdf 1/16
http://www.jstor.org
The Ordination of a Tree: The Buddhist Ecology Movement in Thailand
Author(s): Susan M. Darlington
Source: Ethnology, Vol. 37, No. 1 (Winter, 1998), pp. 1-15
Published by: University of Pittsburgh- Of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3773845
Accessed: 02/09/2008 07:47
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=upitt.
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the
scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that
promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
8/2/2019 Ordination PDF
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ordination-pdf 2/16
THE ORDINATION OF A TREE: THE BUDDHIST
ECOLOGY MOVEMENT IN THAILAND1
SusanM. Darlington
HampshireCollege
Aspartof a growingenvironmentalmovementn Thailand,a smallnumberof Buddhistmonks engage in ecological conservationprojects. These "ecology monks" teach
ecologically oundpracticesamongThaifarmersand criticizerapideconomicdevelop-ment nationwide (which they see as one of the primary causes of the country'senvironmental risis). This articleexamineshow one northern Thaimonk used a tree
ordination,adaptedfrom a traditionalBuddhistritual, to buildvillagers'commitmentto his ecologyprojects.(Buddhism,environmentalism, itual, Thailand)
A Buddhist cologymovement,developingn Thailand ndotherBuddhistnations,addresses ocal and nationalproblemsof deforestationndecologicaldestruction.While this is only one aspectof growingenvironmentalismn Thailand Hirsch1996), the Buddhistsnvolvedin this movement ee theirreligionas criticalfor
providingpracticalas well as moralguidelines or ecologicalconservation.Thisarticle ocuseson howBuddhists, speciallymonks,puttheirconceptsof Buddhismandecologyintoaction,and heconsequent einterpretationsf bothsets of conceptsthatresult romsuchbehavior.As Buddhisms increasingly sedto promote ocialactivismsuch as conservation, ts role in Thai society is also being implicitly
challengedndreworked.While he exact
changeshatwill occurare
unknown,he
Buddhistcologymovement's otential irectionmaybeglimpsedbyexamining ow
rituals,particularly rdaining rees, promotethe ecology movement,lendingit
economic,political,social,and moral orce.The "ecology monks" are those actively engaged in environmentaland
conservationactivitiesand who respondto the sufferingwhich environmental
degradationauses.A majoraim of Buddhisms to relievesuffering, he rootcausesof which are greed, ignorance,andhatred.The monks see the destruction f the
forests, pollutionof the air and water, and other environmental roblemsas
ultimately ausedby peopleacting hroughheseevils, motivated y economicgain
andthe materialbenefitsof development,ndustrialization,nd consumerism.Asmonks,theybelieveit is theirdutyto take actionagainst heseevils. Theiractions
bringtheminto the realmof politicaland economicdebates,especiallyconcerningtherapiddevelopment f theThaieconomyandcontrolof natural esources.
Thescholarlydebate hathas arisen egardingherelationshipetweenBuddhismandecologyrevolvesaroundwhetherBuddhism romotesan environmentalistthicandwhat the basisof such anethicis withinthe religion.Muchof this debatehasoccurred nanabstractevel, looking o thescriptures,uchas thePalicanon,eitherto upholdor to refutethe idea that Buddhism upportsenvironmentalisme.g.,Chatsumarn1987, 1990; Harris 1991; Sponsel and Natadecha-Sponsel 995;Thurman1984). Otherworkhasfocusedon the forestmonksof ThailandandSri
ETHNOLOGYvol. 37 no. 1, Winter 1998, pp. 1-15.
ETHNOLOGY,c/o Departmentof Anthropology,The Universityof Pittsburgh,PittsburghPA 15260 USA
Copyright? 1998 The Universityof Pittsburgh.All rightsreserved.
8/2/2019 Ordination PDF
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ordination-pdf 3/16
2 ETHNOLOGY
Lanka, meditationmasters who emphasizea relationshipbetween the Sangha(monkhood) nd he forestbut not themonks' nvolvementnexplicitenvironmentalactivism Chatsumarn990;Tambiah 984;Taylor1993a).A few studiesexamine
the interaction etweenBuddhistprinciplesandconceptsof ecology; looking,forexample,atthepromotion f wildlifeandplantconservation ithin emplegroundsdue to the Buddhistnotion of preserving ife generally(Pei 1985; SponselandNatadecha 988).Whileunderstandinghescripturalasesof ecologyandhowdailypractice oincideswithconservations critical, orthemostpart hesestudieshavenot examined he consciouseffortsof Buddhists o becomeactivelyengagedin
dealing with the environmental risis beyondthe inherentconnectionbetweenBuddhist eachingsand nature.This essay describes he responseof a handfulofTheravadaBuddhistmonksto the severeenvironmentalrisis in Thailandand its
impacton the lives of ruralpeoples.
THEENVIRONMENTALND POLITICAL ONTEXT
Although t hasbeensuggested hatBuddhism as been"co-optedo argue hecase for a moreenvironmentallyriendlyapproacho development"Rigg1995:12),the severityof the environmentalrisisandits linkwithdevelopmentn Thailandcannot be denied. As will be exploredbelow, the monksare respondingo the
consequences f environmentalegradationn ruralpeopleand heirqualityof life.The debates urroundingnvironmentalismre nherentlyolitical, nvolving ontrol
over and access to natural esources especially and,forests,andwater)andthecausesof rapiddeforestation nd otherenvironmentalroblems.The focus here ison deforestationecauseof its relevance o the ruralpeoplewithwhomthe monkswork; deforestation,however, is only one element of a complexenvironmentalsituationn a rapidly hangingnational conomy.
The rateof deforestationn Thailands higher han n anyAsiancountry xceptNepal(Hirsch1993:2)andpossiblyBorneo.Theofficial iguresgivenby theRoyalForest Department RFD) indicate hat in 1961 (whenthe currentdrive towardeconomicdevelopment eriouslybegan),53 percent of the nationwas covered nforest.By 1986,thisfiguredroppedo between 5 and29
percent.
Nongovernmen-tal organizationNGO)estimatesplace the current igureas low as 15 per cent(Hirsch 1993:26-27;Pinkaewand Rajesh1991:22-23;Trebuil1995:68). These
figuresrepresent decrease romapproximately5 percent forestcover in 1913(Hirsch1993:27).
Thedifferencesbetween heofficialfiguresand NGOestimatesarelargelydueto howforest s defined.TheRFDincludesorestreserveands,despite hefactthatmuchof thearea abeledas suchhas beencleared.Theyalso includeeconomicandproductive orests, includingmonocropplantations uch as eucalyptus orests.EnvironmentalGOsrarely onsiderhese andsasforested.Theforestreserveands
are particularly roblematic s even areas whichstill have forestcover (usuallysecondaryorest) endto be inhabited y small-scalearmerswho either ivedthere
8/2/2019 Ordination PDF
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ordination-pdf 4/16
THEORDINATION F A TREE
atthe time thegovernment esignatedt as forestreserve andor latermigratedntothe area n searchof land. Thesepeoplehaveno legaltitle to the landalthoughheydependon it for their ivelihood.
Environmentalismn Thailand s not equivalent o the Westerndistinctionbetweendevelopment ndpristinenatural reas hatmustbe preserved. nThailandnature s inextricablyinkedwith economics.The critical ssue is accessto landandresourcesand the need to maintain ustainableivelihoods. The debatesrevolvearoundwhoseconceptsof sustainableivelihoodare to be upheld.
The causes of deforestation, omplexand inherently conomic and political,rangefrompovertyin ruralareasto economicdevelopment ndconsumerismn
Bangkok(Rigg 1995:6). They include commercial ogging (illegal since 1989),gatheringuel wood andmaking harcoalby ruralpoor,andswiddenagriculturen
highland reas althoughhe blameplacedon swiddenagriculturalistsftenignoresthe recentdecreasen available and hatwouldallowsustainableallowperiodsand
the uplandmigrationof increasingnumbersof lowlandpeoples). Ruralpeople,encouragedo clearmore orests ojoin inthe marketconomy,have ncreased ash-
crop production,but at the cost of clearingnatural orests. Nationalsecurity,especiallyduring hepre-1980era of Communistnsurgency ased n remote orest
areas, contributedo deforestation y buildingroads to make the forests moreaccessibleand diminish he areas n whichthe Communists ould hide. Farmersnsearchof landquicklymoved ntothe secured orests.Theprocessof state ormationlinkedthe nationalperipherieswith the center n Bangkokover the past century,
similarly creatinggreateraccess to previouslyisolated areas (Hirsch 1993:29).Cultural iews also promoteddeforestations the forests(paa and theuan)were
traditionallyeen as wild or untamed Stott 1991) and available o the generalpopulation s common andto be broughtntocivilizationandproductivity.Thesefactorscontributedo deforestation ndthe integration f the ruralpopulationntomainstreamoliticaldiscourseHirsch1993:14).Both heenvironmentalegradationand the limitsplaced uponruralpeoplesthroughpublic policy (in particular,heeffortsby the governmento remove armers rom national orest reserve ands nfavorof eitherconservation r economicdevelopment f productiveorests)affectthe
qualityof life of the rural
population.These issues have
provokedome monks
intosociallyconsciousaction n thenameof religiouspracticeandresponsibility.
ECOLOGYMONKS
InThailand,he self-proclaimedcologymonks phranakanuraksa) re at thecore of the Buddhistecology movement.Although ome of these environmentalactivistsparticipaten thescholarlydebateon the issue, theirprioritiesie in actionto preservevanishing orests,watersheds, ndwildlife,and o mitigate henegativeconsequences f theirdisappearancen people's lives. Their effortsprovidethe
motivationor re-examininghe scripturesn lightof environmentalismather hanthe studyof the canoncreating he impetus or conservation.To understandhe
3
8/2/2019 Ordination PDF
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ordination-pdf 5/16
4 ETHNOLOGY
current cologymovementn Thailand, ndultimatelyn otherBuddhist ations, tis importanto examine he effect of thepracticeof theecologymonkson religionin Thailand, o see how theybasetheirprojectson Buddhism, einterpretingnd
rearticulatingeligious oncepts, he role of theSangha, nd he function f Buddhistrituals n theprocess.
The number f monks nvolved n theecologymovementn Thailand, lthoughsmall,hasrecently rownrapidly2 iththepopularityf environmentalismurrentlysweepingThailand.Giventhe respect he Sanghacommandsn Thaisociety, the
potential or theirecologicalactivism s high. This can be illustratedhrough he
analysisof anecologyproject onductedn 1991 nNanProvince,northern hailand.Thisproject,co-ordinatedy a Buddhistmonk, nvolved hecreation ndsanctifica-tion of a protected ommunityorest hroughhe ordination f thelargest emainingtree in the forest. The tree ordination rovides nsightinto how ecology monks
throughoutThailandare rethinkingBuddhismand adaptingBuddhistrituals to
promote heir cause. Their concern s as muchto maintain he relevanceof the
religionin a rapidlychangingworld of industrializationnd modernization s tocreate an environmentalwarenessamonglocalpeopleand the Thai nationas awhole.
The ecology monkscome froma cross-section f the ThaiSangha.A few ofthemarebased n urban emples,andareinvolved n providing cripturalustifica-tions andscholarly xaminations f themovement ather han akinganactiverole.The majorityof the activistmonks are fromruralareas,the placesmostdirectly
affected by threats of environmental egradation.They come from both theMahanikaiand Thammayut ects. A few are rankedmembers of the Sanghahierarchy, uch as PhraPhothirangsrin ChiangMai Province,andcome under
greater crutinyandcriticism han ess prominentmonks.Evenwhileprovidinganalternativeo thetraditionalctivities f theSangha,ewof theecologymonks haveencountered elongto the moreconservativeadicalbreak-awayects, suchas theSantiAsokeor Thammakaay ovements.Most of the monks ryto avoidexplicitpoliticalstatements although hereare well-knownexceptions,particularly hra
PrajakKhuttajitto;aylor1993b, 1996;Reynolds1994),but thepoliticalnature ftheissues cannotbe ignored.Most
ecologymonksare
supportedrassisted
bylocal
and even nationalenvironmental GOs, some of the loci of politicaloppositionwithinThaisocietytoday.
Overthepastcentury, hegovernment as takenovermany raditionalctivitiesof Thaivillagemonks.While hetemplesremainhespiritual eartof villages,onlya few still houseschools or serve as health-care r community enters Darlington1990;Kingshill1965 [1960];Tambiah1970, 1976).To compensate ndmaintainclose contact with the laity, many monks performan increasingnumberofceremonies.For example,the consecration f Buddha mageshas becomemore
frequentD. K. Swearer,pers.comm.).The moreactive,visible,and n manyways
controversialesponsehas been o movetoward ociallyengagedaction. SeeQueenandKing 1996 for a goodoverviewof engagedBuddhistmovementsn Asia.)This
8/2/2019 Ordination PDF
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ordination-pdf 6/16
THE ORDINATION OF A TREE
firstmanifestedtself in Thailandn the 1970sthroughhe rise of the developmentmonks(phranakphadthanaa,an informalgroupmadeup of mostlyrural,lower-rankedmonksworking ndependentlyf thegovernment),who promotegrassroots
economicdevelopmenthroughouthe country Darlington1990; Somboon1987,1988).
Fromthedevelopmentmonksemerged heecologymonks,who see theirworkas monksandBuddhists s promoting uman esponsibilityoward he naturaland
inherently ocial) environment.They stressan interpretationf the religionthat
emphasizes he Buddha'sconnectionwith natureand the interdependencef all
things. While many of these monks work independentlyn their conservation
programs,hey are awareof the actionsof othermonks,share deas, information,andexperiences, ndparticipatenregional ndnationalrainingeminarse.g., Thai
Inter-Religiousommissionor
Development992).Some
provinces,uchas Nakorn
Ratchasima nd SuratThani,alsohaveco-operativessociations f monks nvolvedin ecological projects. Throughtheir preaching,educationalprograms, andconservation ctivities,the ecologymonkshave influencedThaisociety'sview ofBuddhismand, to some degree, its practice.They have raised the nation'sconsciousness egardingts environmentalesponsibilities s theiractivitieshavedrawn ignificant ttention ndmediacoverage.3
Criticism has been leveled at many ecology monks by the government,developers, nd hemoreconservativemembers ftheSanghaorbecomingnvolvedin political ssuesand activities een as inappropriateor Buddhistmonks(suchas
protestingheconstructionf hydroelectricams).TheThaiSanghahastraditionallybeenconservativeespeciallywhencomparedwiththe monks n Burma,SriLanka,Tibet, and Vietnam), rarely makingpolitical statementsor criticisms of the
government. he actionsofthedevelopmentmonksandespeciallyheecologymonkshavechallengedomeof thedevelopment oliciesof thegovernmentndquestionedtheindustrializationnd ncreasedonsumerismf Thaisociety.Theircritics,manyof whomtendto benefit romthecurrent irection f Thaidevelopment, elievethe
Sangha's ole shouldbe strictly n thespiritual ealm,keepingclearof politicalandeconomic issues. Some, such as the Sanghahierarchy,are concerned hat such
potentiallyontroversialctions ouldharm he
reputationf the
Sanghaas a
whole,lessening ts influencen providingmoralguidelineso thepeople.Regardlessof the reactions o them, the ecology monksarguethat it is their
responsibility s monks andas Buddhistso becomeengaged n this manner.TheBuddhistcologists andsociallyengagedBuddhistsn general; ee QueenandKing1996;ThaiInter-Religious ommissionorDevelopmentndInternational etworkof EngagedBuddhists1990) stress their connectionwith the Buddha's deas ofnature,heoriginsof thereligion,and he Buddha's dmonitionso relievesufferingin the world. Theirmovementdoes not advocatea new form of Buddhism, heyargue,but is aneffortto putthe basic ideas of the religion n terms that meet the
needs of the modernworld.Theysee this movementas one of "radical onserva-tism,"4 eturningo theoriginal eachings f the Buddha s appliedo contemporary
5
8/2/2019 Ordination PDF
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ordination-pdf 7/16
6 ETHNOLOGY
situations.This movement s not limitedto Thailand,but is part of a growinginternational uddhistmovementhatgoesbeyondnational ndsectarian ifferencesto promote cologicalawareness.
Therehavebeen monks n Thailandxplicitly oncerned bout heenvironmentfor sometime, such as PhraAjarnPongsakTechadhammon ChiangMai(Suchira1992;Renardn.d.) and Buddhadasahikkhun SuratThani,buttheiractionsand
teachingshadlimitedscope. In recentyears,the Buddhist cology movementhascoalesced nto a consciousandsomewhato-ordinatednstitution. tscoherence ndtheincreased o-operationnddialogueamongmonks romdifferent egionsof the
countryhave drawnpublicattentiono themovement ndgreateracceptance f itsmethodsandthe appropriatenessf suchactionsby monks.Thisnew approacho
religionandmonks nThaisocietyand hecreative pplicationf theecologymonks'
philosophyo makeBuddhist ituals oolsof social actionmaychange
heconceptsand practiceof Thai Buddhism.One exampleis the work of PhrakhruPitak
Nanthakhun f Nan Province,the monk who co-ordinated he tree ordinationexaminedhere.
HISTORICALACKGROUND
Phrakhru itak's ponsorshipf treeordinationsndother nvironmentalctionscame romhisexperiencen a remotemountainillageaffectedby deforestationndthe promotionof cashcropsandconsumerism.n the mid-1970s,shortlyafterhis
ordination,PhrakhruPitak became alarmedat the deforestation nd damagedwatershedsntheregionaround is homevillagedueto extensive ogging legaland
illegal)by largecompanies ndclear-cuttingy northernThai farmers n order o
plantmaize.Thevillagerscontinually adto cut into theforestto growmaizeas a
supplementaryourceof income,andthemaize tselfcaused ignificantrosionand
damage o the soil, necessitatingurtherclear-cuttingor agriculturaland. Thiscausedhisdistrict o become hepoorestanddriest ntheprovince,with thehighestrateof adultsmigratingofindwork nBangkok.Foryears he monkpreached bout
ecologicalconservation, tressing he interconnectionetweensocial and naturalenvironments ndhumankind's
esponsibilityo each.
Despite Phrakhru itak'spreaching, he destructionontinued.The villagerscameto himto makereligiousmeritand isten o his sermons, hen returned ometo clearthe land.Theloggingcompanies ut the forestandthevillagerswereeithertoo afraidof retributionrtoounorganizedo oppose hem.If theysawaconnectionbetween heiractions, heir ncreasing overty,and heenvironmentalrisis,theydid
nothingabout t. In early 1990Phrakhru itakvisitedPhrakhruManasof PhayaoProvince, he monkcreditedwithperforminghefirstsymbolicordinationf a treeto makepeopleawareof environmentalesponsibility.nJune1990,Phrakhruitakmovedbeyondpreaching necologicalmessageandsponsored treeordinationn
thecommunityorestof his homevillage(seeDarlington .d.), and n July1991 heperformed second o sanctify heforestsurroundingenneighboringillages.
8/2/2019 Ordination PDF
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ordination-pdf 8/16
THEORDINATION FA TREE
These ceremonieswere only a small portionof the monk'sprojects,whichincluded everalmonthsof educating illagersaboutenvironmentalssues,trainingyoung emporary ovicesabout he naturalnvironment,hepromotion f economic
alternativeso growingmaize as a cash crop, and the establishment f protectedcommunityorests(see Darlington .d.; LocalDevelopmentnstitute1992;SanehandYos 1993).Phrakhru itakpromotedelf-reliant evelopment rojects, uch as
integrated griculture mphasizingplanting or subsistenceratherthan for sale,becauseprotectinghe forestsimplyby denying hevillagersaccessto it would notbe successful.Since the villagers gainedmuch of their income from the forest,economic alternativesneeded to be established o ensure their co-operation n
preservingheforest. Localcommitteeswere also establishedo manageheforests,
patrol the sanctified areas againstincursion,and sponsorcontinuedecologicalactivities o
keepthecommitment f the
projectsalive.
The tree ordinationwas the symboliccenterof Phrakhru itak's conservation
program.The discussionswith the villagers eadingup to the ordination nd theconservationactivitiesorganizedby them afterwardwere all motivatedby theemotional and spiritualcommitment reatedby the ceremony. Throughouthe
ceremony, Buddhistsymbols were used to stress the religious connection to
conservation,he villagers' nterdependenceiththeforest,and the moralbasis oftheproject.
THE TREEORDINATION EREMONY
Tree ordination eremoniesbuattonmai)areperformed y manyparticipantsin the Buddhist cology movementn order o raisethe awarenessof the rate ofenvironmental estructionn Thailand nd to builda spiritual ommitment monglocalpeopleto conservingheforestsandwatersheds. omelarge-scale rdinationshavebeencarriedout forpublicity ndpublicsympathyo make hegovernmenteethe environmentalmpactof some of its economicdevelopment lans.(Thiswas thecase in the southernprovinceof SuratThani n March1991,when over50 monksandlay peopleentereda nationalparkto wrapmonks' robes aroundall the largetreesin a rainforest hreatened
ythe construction f a dam
[Pongpet1991].)Most
treeordinationsreaimedatlocalareas,andvillagers, hroughheirparticipationntheseceremonies, ignifytheiracceptance f this adaptationf a Buddhist itual o
sanctify he forest andtherebyprotect t. Theregulationshe monksestablish imittheiruse of theforest,forbiddinghe cuttingof anytrees or killingof anywildlifewithin t.
InJuly1991,I attended treeordinationeremonyn Nan Provincen northernThailandponsored yPhrakhru itakNanthakhun. lthoughhetreeordination astheculmination f monthsofpreparationndwasoneaspectof a larger onservation
program,he actual eremonynvolvedonlya dayanda half of activities.Phrakhru
Pitak nvitedovertwentymonks romNan andothernorthern rovinces o assistinperformingheceremony.Recognizingheimportancef gaining hesupport f the
7
8/2/2019 Ordination PDF
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ordination-pdf 9/16
8 ETHNOLOGY
Sanghahierarchy nd he localgovernmentor theproject's uccess,Phrakhruitakconsulted with and involved membersof the province'sSangha organization,especiallythe seniormostmonk in the three subdistricts f the ten participating
villages,the DistrictOfficer,andother ocal bureaucrats.5 any ocalgovernmentofficials and mid-level membersof the Sangha hierarchyparticipatedn the
ceremony.Giventheindependentature ndpotentiallyontroversialspectsof theactivitiesof mostsociallyengagedmonks,Phrakhruitak'sattentiono convincingthe Sanghahierarchy nd thegovernment f theproject'smportances significantfor assuring ts success. Thenightbefore heceremony epresentativesf WildlifeFundThailandanaffiliateof WorldWildlifeFund)showedslides to thevillagers.Theircosponsorshipf theprojectplacedPhrakhru itak'sworkon a national tageandgave it furtheregitimacy.Not only is WFT one of the largestenvironmentalNGOs n Thailand, ut it also has
royalpatronage.heinvolvement f NGOs nthe
workof ecologymonks s essential o muchof theirsuccess,although t the sametime it raises potentialpolitical issues, as many NGOs are openly critical of
government olicy.The ordinationceremony began in the morningwith a modificationof a
traditionalitual, hautphaapaa (thegivingof theforestrobes).Traditionally,hisritual s performed y Thai aypeople o donate obes,money,andothernecessitiesto monks orreligiousmerit.Thefundsraised upporthe monksand heupkeepofthetemple.Since the 1980sthisritualhas beenincreasingly sedacross he nationto raise funds for local development rojects; hose contributing fferings o the
monksgainmerit,andthe monksallowthe moneydonated o be usedforprojectsranging rombuildingor repairing school to establishing localcreditunionor
village co-operative tore.People'scommitmento suchprojects s oftenstrongerbecauseof the religiousconnotationsehind hesourceof thefunds-they notonlygainmerit rom heoriginaldonations tthephaapaaceremony,but romsupportingthedevelopment roject anctioned y themonksas well.
Phrakhru itakaddeda newtwistto thisceremony.Severalnurseries roundhe
provincial apitalandsomewealthypatrons ffered12,000seedlings o themonks.
Along with the donationof seedlings,therewere several otherinnovations.The
villagersparadedheir
offeringsn three
groups,representinghe threesubdistricts
inwhichthe tenparticipatingillagesbelonged.While heycarriedmodel reeswith
simple offeringsof moneyandnecessities, heydid not dance,drink,or playthetraditionalmusicthatusuallyaccompanies phaapaaparade Darlington 990:132-
37). Rather,each of the threegroupsperformed kits they had preparedwhich
presentedtheir ideas of conservingthe forest. Two were straightforward;or
example,onegrouppantomimedlanting eedlings.The mostdramatic f thethreeincludedpoliticalcommentary. hevillagersactedout anincident f theforestbeingcut down, passingthe blamefrom the minorityhill people, to the northernThai
villagers,untilit finallysettledon thegovernmentornotprotectingheforest.The
politicaldebateconcerningorestconservationndtheeconomic nterests nvolvedin its destruction nderliesall conservation ctivities.6 t is unusual,however,for
8/2/2019 Ordination PDF
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ordination-pdf 10/16
THEORDINATION F A TREE
these issues to be brought o openlyto the surface,especiallyduringa Buddhistritual.All threeskitsemphasizedhe urgentneedfor the villagers o conserve heforest.
Once the forest robeswere rituallyacceptedby Phrakhru itak, he and thehighest-rankingmonkpresent accepted he seedlings,thus sanctifying hem and
conferringmerit on the donors and the participants.A few of the seedlingswere
planted round hetemplegrounds ndatthesiteof the tree ordination s partof the
ceremony.Mostweregivento thevillagers o reforestareas hathadbeendenuded,
following the patternestablishedby phaa paa ceremonies conductedto raise
developmentprojectfunds. These new trees were chosen carefully;they were
species, such as fruittrees, that were profitablewithouthavingto be cut down.
Havingbeen sanctifiedand given by the monks furtherprotected hem, as the
villagerswouldsee
cuttinghem as a formof
religiousdemerit
baap).Afterplantinghe trees at thetemple, heparticipantslimbed ntotrucks,vans,andbusesto make he five-kilometerrip ntothe mountainso the tree chosen o beordained.Over 200 people accompaniedhe morethantwentymonks to the site,which hadearlierbeenprepared y volunteer evelopment orkersandvillagers.Afour-foot-tall uddhamagehad beenplacedon a concrete tandat thebase of the
giant ree.Thethickvegetation round he sitehadbeentrimmed,anda tent forthemonksput up. Phrakhru itak commentedhat over twentyyears ago, when hewalked heeightkilometersromhisvillagethroughhedeepforest o schoolalongthisroute,this treewas notunusualor its heightor size. Now it clearlystoodout
asthetallestremainingree. Onecouldnow see for milesfrom t acrossa landscapedottedwithnearlyverticalmaizefields,visiblebecauseof the deforested illsides.
It is importanto notethat nthisceremony,ike all treeordinations,he monksdid not claim to be fully ordaininghe tree, as that status s reserved or humans
only. Theceremonywas usedsymbolicallyo remindpeoplethatnature houldbetreated sequalwithhumans,deserving f respectandvital for human swell as alllife. The opportunity f the ordinationwas usedto buildspiritual ommitmento
preserving he forest and to teach in an active and creativeway the value ofconservation.Themainemphasis f Phrakhru itak'ssermonduring heritualwason the
relationshipetween he Buddha ndnature, nd he
interdependenceetween
theconditionsof the forest andthevillagers' ives.
During he ritual,at the samepointin which a new monkwould be presentedwith his robes,two monkswrapped rangerobes around he tree'strunk,markingits sanctification. crowdofphotographersrom ocalandBangkok ewspapersnd
participatingGOs,oneanthropologist,nd wovideocamera rewsdocumentedhe
quickact. The robesstood as a reminderhat o harmor cut thetree-or anyof theforest-was anactof demerit.While t was not unusual o findbodhitrees(thetreeunderwhich he Buddha chieved nlightenment)rappedwithsacred loth,inthosecasesthetree wasalready een asholy;the cloth servedmore o honor hetreethan
to sanctify t. Theinnovation erewas that hetreeordainedwas notalreadyreated
9
8/2/2019 Ordination PDF
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ordination-pdf 11/16
10 ETHNOLOGY
as sacredbut was madeso throughhe ritual.Theorange obessymbolizedts newstatus.
As in mostordinations,heritualncluded he sanctificationf water na monk's
almsbowl. A small Buddhamagewasplaced n the bowland candlewax drippedintothe waterwhilethe monkschanted.Traditionally,hisholywater nammon) s
sprinkled n the participants, onferring blessingon them.Thiswater s seenas
rituallyverypowerful,andpeople alwaysmakesure to receivesome of the dropsfromthe monk(Olson 1991). On this occasion,Phrakhru itakused the blessedwater n anoriginalmanner.Eachof theheadmenrom he tenvillagesdrank omeof the water n frontof the largeBuddhamageto seal theirpledgeto protect heforest.Thisuseof a sacred ymbol o strengthenuchanoathwasanothernnovationwhich reinforced he notionof environmentalisms a moral action.It madethe
protectionr destruction f theforestkarmic ction:
protectingtwould
confergoodmerit bun),destroyingt bringing ad,the balance f whichwouldultimately ffectone'srebirth r evenqualityof livinginthis life. Beyond hat,it drewon thebeliefof the villagersin the magicalpowersof the holy water;while specificsanctionswerenot mentionedorfailing oupholdheheadmen's ledge, heimplications erethatbreaking t would involvegoing against he powersecuredby the use of thewater.
Perhapshemosttellingaspectof theceremonytheonewhich nitselfraises hemostquestionsor is opento thegreatest arietyof alternativenterpretations)s the
plaque hatwas nailed o thetreeprior o theordination.No formalmentionof the
sign was made during the ritual, nor was much discussion or fanfaremadeconcerning ts contentor placement.Yet it alwaysdrawsthe most attentionanddiscussion romThaiwhoare ntroducedo it. Thesignreads,"Thamaaypaakheetham aaychaat,"whichcanbetranslated, Todestroyheforest s to destroy ife."The wordchaat(life) is problematicndcancarryseveralmeanings,all of whichrelateto the issue of conservation on various levels.7 Chaat can mean life, birth (asin rebirth),or nation.Thesentence ouldthusbe read,"Todestroy heforest s to
destroy ife, one'srebirth,or thenation."The first meaningis the most straightforwardrom the point of view of
environmentalists hose concernsdo not necessarily nvolve eitherreligiousornationalistonnotations.Yet it alsoimplies heBuddhistdea hatoneshouldrespectandcarefor all life becauseanybeingcouldhavebeen one'smother n a previouslife. The secondmeaning, o destroyone'srebirth,nvokes heconceptof kamma.Itraises he ideathatdestroyingheforest s anact of demeritandconsequently asa negative nfluenceon how one is reborn n one'snext life. Thethirdpossibility,thatof destroyinghenation meaning oth erritory ndpeople;Reynolds1977:274,1994:442), s themostcomplex.Itevokesnationalisteelings,linking heconditionof the forestwith that of the state. It drawsuponthe moralconnectionbetweennation chaat),religion satsana),andmonarchymahakeset),hetrinityof concepts
whichsupposedlymakesup Thailand'sdentity Reynolds1977, 1994).Eventhismeanings double-edged.While t invokes hevillagers' oyalty othenationand he
8/2/2019 Ordination PDF
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ordination-pdf 12/16
THE ORDINATION F A TREE
kingin protectingheforest,it alsocallsuponthe nation tself to uphold ts moral
responsibilityo preserve heforest.Given hepoliticalundertones f theconserva-tion issue, it is unlikely hatthis implicitmeanings presentby merecoincidence.
The use of the word chaat on the sign demonstrateshe complexityandsignificanceof the tree ordination.Conceptsof religionarebeing reinterpretedo
promoteenvironmentalismt the same timethe latter s linked hroughmoraltieswith ocalandnational oliticalandeconomic ssues.Throughoutheordination, ndthelargerprojectof which t was a part,Phrakhru itakextendedhistraditional oleas spiritualand moral leader of lay villagers to embrace an activism whichnecessitates olitical nvolvement.The samekindof roleenlargements recreatedn
every projectrunby ecologymonks, romtree ordinationsndtheestablishment fsacredcommunity orests to tree-plantingeremoniesand exorcisms or long-lifeceremonies t sitesthreatenedy ecologicaldestruction.
THEMORALITYOFENVIRONMENTALISM
Monksare notsupposedo be concernedwithworldly ssues such aspolitics.Atthe same time, however,the ecology monks see environmental estructionas acrucial actor n theirmainconcern-human uffering.Theycannotavoid a certain
degreeof involvementn the former f theyare to deal withthe latter.Theyfeel a
responsibilitys monks o teachpeopleenvironmentalwareness ndshow them he
path to relievingtheir suffering.The root causes of sufferingare, in Buddhist
philosophy,greed,ignorance, ndhatred.As thedestructionf theforest s causedby theseevils (through eople'sselfish aimsat economicgainor unconsidered seof natural esources o meet needsarising rompovertyandoverly rapiddevelop-ment), he monks ee itas theirduty o adaptraditionaleligious onceptsandritualsto gainthevillagers'acceptancendcommitmento theirecologicalaims.
The destruction f theenvironment as not a significantssuein Thailand ntiltherapid ndustrializationf thecountrybecamea national riorityafterWorldWarII (Sponseland Natadecha 988:305).Eventhen, it was not until the 1980sthatnature onservation ecameawidespreadoncern,despite he earlier ffortsof suchenvironmentalNGOs as Wildlife FundThailandand the Projectfor
EcologicalRecovery.The adoptionof the issue by the ecologymonksbeginning n the late1980shasraised hemovement o a newlevel. Itcanno longerbe seensimplyas aneconomicorpoliticaldebatebetween nvironmentalistsnddevelopers,but has nowbeenplacedon a moralplane.Themonksare concernedwiththesufferingof bothhumans ndwildlifewhichresults rom hedestruction f the forestsandwatersheds.As it is a moralissue, the monks are interpretinghe scriptureso support heiractionsandareadaptingraditionalitualsandsymbols o involve ay villagers nthemovement.
Theecologymonksarewalkinga fine linebetween heir raditionalesponsibili-
ties as spiritual eadersandtheir new practiceas social activists.They are con-sciouslyusing the formerto supportand even justify the latter,to counterthe
11
8/2/2019 Ordination PDF
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ordination-pdf 13/16
12 ETHNOLOGY
criticisms hat heirenvironmentalffortsareinappropriateormonks.The result sa complex nterplay etweenraditionaleligious oncepts, ymbols,andrituals,andmoraldebatesof politicalandeconomic ssues. While hefocus of specificactivities
such as tree ordinationss predominantlyn local areas, the innovativeuse oftraditionalituals,such as theparade ndskitsaccompanyinghephaapaaton mai
ceremony,andthe implication f signslikethe one nailed o thetreein Nan,placethe issue on a nationalpolitical evelas well. Throughhe use of words likechaat,the monksraise issues thatquestion he role andresponsibility f the local andnational overnmentsn deforestation ndconservation.
Similarly, hepractice f religion tself s beingchanged, venchallenged,n the
process.Buddhismn Thailand asbecome ess relevant o dailylife over thepastcenturybecauseof increasing overnmentnvolvementn lay life through chools,
improvedhealthcare,
developmentrojects,andotherareas.TheBuddhist
cologymovement,ollowing hemodelof the workof developmentmonks, s notallowingthereligion o becomerelegatedo a secondary lacein Thaisociety.It challengesthe Sangha,as well as the Thaipeople, to reconsider ts role and not to acceptcomplacency r merelyperform ituals hat have no directrelevance or relievingsuffering n dailylife. It forcesBuddhistso question ndthinkabout he causesof
people'ssuffering,even whenthese causesare controversial r political.Whiletheactivistmonks'aim is to relievesuffering ndmaintainherelevance f thereligioninachanging ociety, his has alsoresultednquestioningndrethinkinghe functionof thereligion tself.
The use of traditionalBuddhist ituals suchas ordinations nd the phaa paaceremony) nd he invocation f powerful eligious ymbols suchasholywaterandmonks'robes,and he implication f words ikechaat n theplaqueontheordainedtree in Nan Province)serve as vehicleswhichsimultaneously reservereligiousconceptsandsentimentsandchallenge heirtraditional se and interpretationsnThailand.Theecologymonksarerespondingo what heyperceiveas threatso or,to putit moremildly,inevitable hanges n theirsocialposition.Theyaremakingconsciouschoices andactions,guidedby long-standingeligiousconceptssuchas
merit-makingndkarmic ction,andsocialrelations etween heSangha nd helay
villagers.As a
consequence,heir
role,the
conceptsnd
practicef the
religion,and
therelationbetween hereligion and tspractitioners)nd he stateare allchanging.While the scripturalustifications ehind he ecologymovementare importantounderstand,he practicewhichaccompaniesr motivateshe re-examinationf thecanon demonstrates hat the processcannot be examinedsolely on an abstract
theologicallevel. The case of the tree ordinationn Nan illustrates he social,political,and economic ssues involved,andreveals he levels at whichthe majorchangesaretakingplace.
This dynamicprocessof change s far fromcomplete.The Buddhist cologymovement s still growingandbecomingmorevocal andcontroversial,hallenging
specificcases of environmentalestruction ausedby policiesof thegovernmentreconomicdevelopment lans.Theresponsesof the government,ndustrialists,nd
8/2/2019 Ordination PDF
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ordination-pdf 14/16
THEORDINATION FA TREE 13
generalmembersof the Sangha,as well as the Sanghahierarchy,all need to beconsideredojudge he full effectof this movement n theconceptsof Buddhism nd
ecologyastheyareinterpretedndpracticednThaisociety.It is apparenthatThai
Buddhism s changing dramatically nd, despite some efforts to use it as aconservative orce to supportthe status quo and governmentpolicies, it hastremendous otential o effect social and environmentalhangein Thailand.Theextent andsuccessof theseefforts,andthetruedirectionof the changes nvolved,remain o be seen.
NOTES
1. Research, conducted in ThailandJunethroughAugust 1991, August 1992 throughJuly 1993, and
JulythroughDecember 1994, was madepossible by grantsfromthe JointCommittee on Southeast Asia
of the Social Science Research Council and the American Council of LearnedSocieties, with funds
provided by the National Endowment or the Humanitiesand the FordFoundation,the Southeast Asian
Council of the Associationof Asian Studies,andthe FordFoundationComparativeScientific Traditions
programof HampshireCollege. I thank David BrawnandAriel Heryantoforhelpful suggestions on an
early draftof this article, and the National Research Council of Thailand for researchpermission.2. While it is difficult to determinemembershipin a category such as "ecology monks," as manymonks are interested in environmentalwork butdo not label themselves as such, a sense of the scopeof the movement can be gained from looking at the participationn a three-dayconference (held near
Bangkok in July 1991) cosponsored by 23 nongovernmental environmental and development
organizations.The organizersexpected around 60 monks to attend;over 200 actually registered.3. From June to August 1991, there were articles on the conservationwork of monks at least weeklyin bothThai and English-languagenewspapers.While much of the coverage focused on the case of Phra
Prajak, the monk who was arrested twice in 1991 for his ecological work as it conflicted with
governmentpolicies concerning national forest land, the work of other ecology monks also received
some attention. On the legal case concerningPhraPrajak,see Reynolds (1994) and Taylor (1993b).4. This term is borrowed from the title of a book in honor of one of the best-known Thai monks,BuddhadasaBhikkhu,who called for socialactionas an aspectof Buddhistpractice(ThaiInter-ReligiousCommission for Development and InternationalNetwork of Engaged Buddhists 1990).5. In later projects, PhrakhruPitak involved provincialgovernmentofficials and Sangha, includingthe governor and militaryleaders.
6. Economicenterprises hatdestroynatural orests include the creation of eucalyptusplantationsand
logging hardwoodtrees such as teak. The former is occurringprimarilyin the northeastlegally, and
at a rapidrate (see Lohmann1991; Sanitsuda1992a, 1992b), while the lattercontinues throughout he
country despite a nationalbanpassed in 1989. The widespreadbelief is thatbothfrequentlyoccur withthe backing of factions within local, regional, and nationalgovernmentsand the military(Pinkaewand
Rajesh 1991).7. I thank Dr. ThongchaiWinichakul and Dr. Robert Bickner for pointing out to me the several
meanings of chaat as used in the sentence on the plaque.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
ChatsumarnK. 1987. How BuddhismCanHelp Protect Nature.Tree of Life: Buddhismand Protection
of Nature, ed. S. Davies, pp. 7-16. Geneva.
1990. Buddhist Monks and Forest Conservation. Radical Conservatism:Buddhism in the
ContemporaryWorld, ed. Thai Inter-Religious Commission for Development and theInternationalNetwork of Engaged Buddhists,pp. 301-09. Bangkok.
8/2/2019 Ordination PDF
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ordination-pdf 15/16
14 ETHNOLOGY
Darlington, S. M. 1990. Buddhism, Morality and Change: The Local Response to Development in
Thailand.Ph.D. dissertation,Universityof Michigan. Ann Arbor.
n.d. PracticalSpiritualityand CommunityForests:Monks, Ritual and Radical Conservatism
in Thailand. EnvironmentalDiscourses andHumanWelfarein South and SoutheastAsia, eds.
A. L. Tsing and P. Greenough.
Harris, I. 1991. How Environmentalists Buddhism?Religion 21:101-14.
Hirsch, P. 1993. Political Economy of Environment n Thailand. Manila.
1996. Environmentand Environmentalismn Thailand:MaterialandIdeologicalBases. SeeingForests for Trees: EnvironmentandEnvironmentalismn Thailand,ed. P. Hirsch, pp. 15-36.
Chiang Mai.
Kingshill, K. 1965 (1960). Ku Daeng-the Red Tomb. Bangkok.Local DevelopmentInstitute.1992. CommunityForestry:Declarationof the CustomaryRightsof Local
Communities.Thai Democracy at the Grassroots.Bangkok.
Lohmann,L. 1991. Peasants,Plantationsand Pulp:The Politics of Eucalyptus n Thailand.Bulletin of
Concerned Asian Scholars 23(4):3-17.
Olson, G. 1991. Cries over Spilt Holy Water. Journalof SoutheastAsian Studies 22:75-85.Pei S. 1985. Some Effects of the Dai People's CulturalBeliefs and Practices on the Plant Environment
of Xishuangbanna,YunnanProvince,Southwest China.CulturalValues and HumanEcologyin Southeast Asia, eds. K. L. Hutterer,A. T. Rambo, and G. Lovelace, pp. 321-39. Ann
Arbor.
Pinkaew L., and N. Rajesh (eds.). 1991. The Future of People and Forests in Thailand after the
Logging Ban. Bangkok.
Pongpet M. 1991. Stoppingthe Chainsaws with Sacred Robes. BangkokPost, March29, pp. 27-28.
Queen, C. S., and S. B. King (eds.). 1996. Engaged Buddhism: Buddhist LiberationMovements in
Asia. Albany.
Renard, R. D. n.d. Using a Northern Thai Forest: Approaches by a ConservationistMonk, Thai
Lowlanders, Hmong Highlanders, and InternationalDevelopment. Ecology, EthnicityandReligion in Thailand,eds. L. E. Sponrsel nd P. Natadecha-Sponsel.
Reynolds, F. E. 1977. Civic Religion and NationalCommunity n Thailand.Journalof Asian Studies
36(2):267-82.1994. Dhamma in Dispute: The Interactionsof Religion and Law in Thailand. Law and
Society Review 28(3):433-51.
Rigg, J. 1995. Counting he Costs: EconomicGrowthandEnvironmentalChange n Thailand.Countingthe Costs: Economic Growthand EnvironmentalChange in Thailand,ed. J. Rigg, pp. 3-24.
Singapore.Saneh C., and Yos S. (eds.) 1993. Paa Chumchon nai Prathetthai:Naewthaangkaan Phadthanaa
(CommunityForests in Thailand:The Direction for Development). Bangkok.SanitsudaE. 1992a.
Tornfrom the Land:
How Tree-PlantingUprootsWhole Villages. BangkokPost,23 January,pp. 23, 42.
1992b. Man and Forest. BangkokPost, 24 January, pp. 27, 48.
Somboon S. 1987. KaanphadthanaaTaam Naew Phuthasaasanaa:Karanii Phra Nak Phadthanaa ABuddhistApproachto Development:The Case of "DevelopmentMonks"). Bangkok.1988. A BuddhistApproach o Development:TheCase of "DevelopmentMonks" in Thailand.Reflections on Development in SoutheastAsia, ed. L. T. Ghee, pp. 26-48. Singapore.
Sponsel, L. E., and P. Natadecha. 1988. Buddhism,Ecology, and Forests in Thailand:Past, Present,and Future.ChangingTropicalForests, eds. J. Dargavel, K. Dixon, and N. Semple, pp. 305-25. Canberra.
Sponsel, L. E., and P. Natadecha-Sponsel.1995. The Role of Buddhism n Creatinga More Sustainable
Society in Thailand. Countingthe Costs: Economic Growthand EnvironmentalChange in
Thailand, ed. J. Rigg, pp. 27-46. Singapore.
8/2/2019 Ordination PDF
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ordination-pdf 16/16
THE ORDINATION OF A TREE
Stott, P. 1991. Mu'ang and Pa: Elite Views of Nature in a ChangingThailand. Thai Constructions of
Knowledge, eds. M Chitakasemand A. Turton,pp. 142-54. London.
SuchiraP. 1992. ChangingProvinces of Concern:A Case-Studyof the Social Impactof the Buddhadasa
Movement. Sojourn7(1):39-68.
Tambiah,S. J. 1970. Buddhism and the Spirit Cults in North-eastThailand.Cambridge.1976. World Conquerorand World Renouncer: A Studyof Buddhismand Polity in Thailand
against a Historical Background. Cambridge.1984. The Buddhist Saints of the Forest and the Cult of Amulets. Cambridge.
Taylor, J. 1993a. Forest Monks and the Nation-State:An Anthropologicaland Historical Study in
NortheasternThailand.Singapore.1993b. Social Activism and Resistance on the Thai Frontier: The Case of Phra Prajak
Khuttajitto.Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars 25(2):3-16.1996. "Thamma-chaat":Activist Monks and CompetingDiscourses of Nature and Nation in
Northeastern Thailand. Seeing Forests for Trees: Environmentand Environmentalism in
Thailand,ed. P. Hirsch, pp. 37-52. ChiangMai.
Thai Inter-Religious Commission for Development. 1992. Kaanoprom Phrasong kap KaananurakThammachaatKhrang hii 3 (TrainingMonks and NatureConservation,Meeting Number3).
Sekhiyatham 2(11):26-31.ThaiInter-ReligiousCommissionfor Developmentand the InternationalNetwork of EngagedBuddhists.
1990. Radical Conservatism: Buddhism in the ContemporaryWorld. Bangkok.Thurman, R. A. F. 1984. BuddhistViews of Nature: Variations on the Theme of Mother-Father
Harmony. On Nature, ed. L. S. Rouner, pp. 96-112. Notre Dame.
Trebuil, G. 1995. PioneerAgriculture,Green Revolution andEnvironmentalDegradation n Thailand.
Countingthe Costs: Economic Growth and EnvironmentalChangein Thailand,ed. J. Rigg,
pp. 67-89. Singapore.
15