optomechanical sensors

88
Optomechanical Sensors Prof. Gaurav Bahl University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Mechanical Science and Engineering [email protected] bahl.mechse.illinois.edu

Upload: lydat

Post on 02-Jan-2017

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Optomechanical Sensors

Optomechanical Sensors

Prof. Gaurav Bahl

University of Illinois, Urbana-ChampaignMechanical Science and Engineering

[email protected]

Page 2: Optomechanical Sensors

Micro-mechanical systems have harnessed many forces

2

Micro-scaleobject

Energy source

Actuation method or “force”

PiezoelectricElectrostatic

ThermalMagnetic

Light!

Photo-thermal

Radiation pressure

Electro-strictivepressure

Gradient force

Page 3: Optomechanical Sensors

Vibrational modes in optomechanical resonators

3

G. BahlSurface wave oscillations

in WGRs

M. EichenfieldMechanical excitation

of zipper cavities

T. CarmonGHz frequency breathe modes

J. ZhuFlapping modein microtoroids

G. BahlOptomechanofluidics

Page 4: Optomechanical Sensors

Radiation pressure: Comets

4

ion

tail

dust tail

Directionto sun

Comet Hale Bopp

dust tail

ion tail

1619 - Johannes KeplerObserved that comet tails (the bright ones) always opposed the sunand hypothesized ‘radiation pressure’ as the reason.

Page 5: Optomechanical Sensors

Quantization of EM energy and momentum (Photons)

5

At small scales, energy and momentum are quantizedIndeed, most other physical properties as well!

The quantum of light = A photonA photon is actually the quantum particle of all forms of electromagnetic radiation!

EnergyMomentum

E = �ω�p = ��kE = hν

E = hc

λ

h = 6.63× 10−34J · s� =

h

2π= 1.054× 10−34J · s

Page 6: Optomechanical Sensors

Argument for the existence of radiation pressure

6

Momentumimparted to the mirror

Mirror(stationary)

Momentum conservation must apply

Since the mirror velocity is changedthere must have been a force on the mirror

�p1 = �p3 − �p2

�p1 �p2 �p3

m

Page 7: Optomechanical Sensors

Let’s calculate the force

7

Change in momentumper photon

Total momentum change per second (i.e. Radiation pressure force)

Photon flux = Optical power / Energy per photon N = P/�ω

= 2�k

= 2P�k/�ω

= 2P/c

(Photons per second)

Page 8: Optomechanical Sensors

Crookes radiometer (1873)

8

ReflectiveAbsorbing

Credit: Wikipedia

Is it moving in the correct direction?

Hint: No. It’s a thermal effect here

Page 9: Optomechanical Sensors

Brief history of “radiation pressure” experiments

9

1873 - William CrookesExperimentally attempted to build a radiometer to

observe radiation pressure. Failed. Instead gave the world a desk toy.

1899/1900 - Pyotr Lebedev(Successfully) Experimentally measured the pressure of light

on a solid body.

1901 to 1903 - Ernest Nichols and Gordon Hull(Successfully) Experimentally measured the pressure of light

on a torsion balance radiometer.

Page 10: Optomechanical Sensors

Nichols & Hull Radiometer

10

Not as visually striking as the Crooke’s radiometer.

Page 11: Optomechanical Sensors

Solar sail

11

Solar sail

Starlight

Force

A proposed means of interstellar travelthat uses reflected starlight for propulsion.

IKAROS (Interplanetary Kite-craft Accelerated by Radiation Of the Sun)

First interplanetary solar sail craft launched by Japan (JAXA) in 2010.Confirmed solar sail acceleration on July 9th 2010. On its way to Venus.Passed Venus in Dec 2010.

Images: Wikipedia

Page 12: Optomechanical Sensors

There are other optical forces too!

12

Gradient force Used for optical tweezers, optical traps,waveguide actuation. Particles get pulled into regions of highoptical intensity.

Electrostrictive force“Electric field results in constriction.”Occurs in all dielectrics.

Credit: Wikipedia

V

Force = −∇xE

Basic idea

Page 13: Optomechanical Sensors

Resonance between mirrors = Fabry-Perot resonator

13

Two waves end uppropagating oppositeto each other.

And there is constructive interference.

Under what conditions?2 x Length = integer

wavelengths

Generates standing wave

Page 14: Optomechanical Sensors

Resonances are typically periodic

14

�15 �10 �5 0 5 10 15

Reflection and absorption within material and mirrors determine the resonance width.

�15 �10 �5 0 5 10 15

Mirror reflectivityR = 0.99

Frequency Frequency

Ampl

itude

of fi

eld

Ampl

itude

of fi

eld

Mirror reflectivityR = 0.9

Material between mirrorsabsorbs and scatters some light

Some light is lostin reflection

FSR

Page 15: Optomechanical Sensors

Quality factor = Optical storage time

15

More energy stored Less energy stored

For more see Saleh + Teich. Chapter 10.

Q = 2πstored energy

energy loss per cycle

Q =νoδν

Linewidth

Optical frequencyQ ≈ νo

νFF

Low-loss mirrors Lossy mirrors

Also, more photoncollisions with walls!

Learn more

Page 16: Optomechanical Sensors

Finesse = number of round trips

16

Low-loss mirrors Lossy mirrors

δν ≈ νFF Finesse

FSR (free spectral range)

Linewidth

For more see Saleh + Teich. Chapter 10.

Valid when F � 1

Important factsFinesse is inversely proportional to cavity length → So use smaller resonators!Radiation pressure is magnified by the finesse factor.

Experimental/phenomenological

Learn more

Page 17: Optomechanical Sensors

Nomenclature: Detuning

17

Wavelength

“Detuning” is defined as the distance from the peak of the resonance. Measured in wavelength or frequency units (your choice).

A signal present here is red detuned

A signal present here is blue detuned

A signal present here is on resonance!

Res

onan

ce fr

eque

ncy

(or

wav

elen

gth)

Δλ

Frequency

Page 18: Optomechanical Sensors

Energy in the cavity depends on detuning

18

Opticalresonance

Wavelength

Couplingefficiency

Maximumintensity inside

resonator

Poorcoupling

Poorcoupling

Page 19: Optomechanical Sensors

Analyzing a sinusoidally shifting resonance

19

Schliesser, A., & Kippenberg, T. J. (2010). Cavity Optomechanics with Whispering-Gallery Mode Optical Micro-Resonators. Advances In Atomic, Molecular, And Optical Physics, Vol 58, 58, 207–323. doi:10.1016/S1049-250X(10)05810-6

ωl

ωl is the input laser frequency

Learn more

Page 20: Optomechanical Sensors

Radiation pressure can induce mechanical oscillation

20

Pumplaser

Resonance

Wavelength

Cavity expands

Pumplaser

Resonance

Wavelength

Cavity collapses

Light in

Resonanceshifts

Less light in

x = 0

xRadiationpressure

Page 21: Optomechanical Sensors

Parametric oscillatory instability

21

This instability was originally discussed in the context of LIGO in 2001...

LIGO = Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory

Learn more

Page 22: Optomechanical Sensors

Optomechanical crystals exhibit this instability

22

Engineered optical resonators that exhibit simultaneous optical and acoustic modes

Optical modes

Acoustic modes

Eichenfield, M., Chan, J., Camacho, R., Vahala, K. & Painter, O. Optomechanical crystals. Nature 462, 78–82 (2009).

Page 23: Optomechanical Sensors

23

Optical field

Acoustic field

Coupling of energy in from optical field

Coupling of energy in from acoustic field

Laser source

+ Langevin noise force(not shown)

Detuning(Optical resonance)

Opticallosses

Detuning(Acoustic resonance)

Acousticlosses

Mathematically describing the opto-mechanical coupling

G is the opto-mechanical coupling coefficientrelated to ...

Cavity deformation causes optical resonance to shift ( dω/dx )Radiation pressure force is modified when optical resonance shifts relative to laserMore photons create more pressure and more deformation

Page 24: Optomechanical Sensors

Electromagnetic wave(speed of light)

24

Acoustic wave(speed of sound)

Monochromaticphotons from a laser

Q > 100,000,000Finesse = Distance traveled / Circumference

Whispering gallery resonators (WGRs)

Page 25: Optomechanical Sensors

25

What is the simplest WGR we can build in the lab?

Reflow

Reflowsomemore

Long optical fiber taper

Arc discharge methodMicrospheres can be fabricated by reflowing a

broken taper in a fiber splicing tool

25

Q ~ 4×108

~150 um

Page 26: Optomechanical Sensors

On chip ultra-high-Q toroid microcavities

26

Letters to NatureNature 421, 925-928 (27 February 2003) | doi:10.1038/nature01371

Ultra-high-Q toroid microcavity on a chipD. K. Armani, T. J. Kippenberg, S. M. Spillane & K. J. Vahala

Page 27: Optomechanical Sensors

Fabrication cross-sectional view

27

Oxide disc on silicon

XeF2 etch

CO2 laserreflow glass

moreCO2 laser

reflow

Toroid

Disc on pedestal

4 um150 um

50 um

30 um

Ellipsoid

Page 28: Optomechanical Sensors

Resonance and FSR for a WGR

28

λo/n

λo Free space wavelength

Light is confined through total internal reflection

(think of infinite reflections)Dielectric

λ2 R = M x

Resonance criterion

Page 29: Optomechanical Sensors

Zipper structures

29

Eichenfield, M., Camacho, R., Chan, J., Vahala, K. J. & Painter, O. A picogram- and nanometre-scale photonic-crystal optomechanical cavity. Nature 459, 550–555 (2009).

Acoustic mode

Optical modes

Distance between beamsis an important parameter

Page 30: Optomechanical Sensors

Optomechanical coupling coefficient

30

We can define the degree to which the optical mode shifts upon application of a

mechanical displacement.

gOM =dω

dx

Typically 1 GHz/nm - 1 THz/nm

Huge! Compared to 1 MHz - 10 MHz linewidth.

Page 31: Optomechanical Sensors

Evanescent field region outside a WGR

31

Complex k(evanescent wave)

Real k (surface wave)

Quickly decayingevanescent fieldFi

eld

stre

ngth

Radialdirection

Page 32: Optomechanical Sensors

No field here

Light “tunnels” through the “barrier”!

Large gap

Evanescentfield

(no propagation)

Coupling to a WGR using evanescent fields

32

“Waveguide”Resonator

But remember, this is a two-way street

Page 33: Optomechanical Sensors

How the resonance condition acts on coupled light

33

“Waveguide”Resonator “Waveguide”Resonator

On resonance Off resonanceLots of light is inside the resonator.

Light escaping the resonator interfereswith light inside the waveguide.

Very little light is inside resonator.Light in the waveguide

is not affected significantly.

Learn more

Page 34: Optomechanical Sensors

Photograph of tapered optical fiber waveguide

34

FiberHydrogentorch

Taper

Page 35: Optomechanical Sensors

The complete picture

35

Resonator

Evanescent couplingOptical “input”

Energy stored= F x (Input x Coupling)

Finesse (F)= # of recirculations

x

Field gets really high

Page 36: Optomechanical Sensors

3rd harmonic generation

36

Spherical microresonator3rd harmonic generation

Input IR Output green laser

Q ~ 4×108

Flicker is due to laser wavelengthbeing intentionally swept

~150 um

Infra-redlaser in

Greenlaser out

This nonlinear process occurs because the material (silica) has a nonlinear characteristic (the (3) nonlinearity).

~ 1500 nm

3W power

~ 500 nm

uW - mWpower

Finesse ~ 105-106

Page 37: Optomechanical Sensors

Origin of centrifugal radiation pressure

37

Change in momentumper photon

Total momentum change per second (i.e. force)

Centrifu

gal fo

rce

Circulating power / energy-per-photon= energy-through-cross-section-per-second / energy-per-photon= #-photons-through-cross-section-per-second

N = P/�ω

= 2�k

= 2P�k/�ω

= 2P/c

Now you can perform suitable integrals to determine force per unit length etc...

Page 38: Optomechanical Sensors

Radiation pressure can induce mechanical oscillation

38

Pumplaser

Resonance

Wavelength

Cavity expands

Pumplaser

Resonance

Wavelength

Top view of resonator

Cavity collapses

Light in

Resonanceshifts

Less light in

PRL 94, 223902 (2005) Optics Express 13, 5293 (2005) PRL 95, 033901 (2005)

Radiationpressure

Reducedradiationpressure

Waveguide

Toroid resonator

Mechanical frequency defined by geometry + materials

Page 39: Optomechanical Sensors

Radiation-pressure driven microtoroids

39

t

Poutput

t

Pinput

Input light (continuous in

time)

Photodetector

Oscilloscope

?

Effect came as an unexpected surprise

Cavity was not designed to vibrate

Morepower

Oscillation!

Page 40: Optomechanical Sensors

Mass sensing with optomechanics

40

Liu, F. & Hossein-Zadeh, M. Mass Sensing With Optomechanical Oscillation. Sensors Journal, IEEE 13, 146–147 (2013).

Optical devices provide extremely high measurement sensitivity, especially in“RF free” zones or harsh environs.

Ultimate limits still defined by Brownian thermal noise.

Ekinci, K. L. Ultimate limits to inertial mass sensing based upon nanoelectromechanical systems. J. Appl. Phys. 95, 2682 (2004).

Page 41: Optomechanical Sensors

Optomechanical Atomic Force Microscope (AFM)

41

Srinivasan, K., Miao, H., Rakher, M. T., Davanço, M. & Aksyuk, V.

Optomechanical Transduction of an Integrated Silicon Cantilever Probe Using a Microdisk Resonator.

Nano Lett 11, 791–797 (2011).

Ultimately hit the fundamentalthermal noise limits

want low stiffness, high freq, high Q.

Coupling a vibrating beam to a WGR -- light excites the beam, and is also used for readout

Page 42: Optomechanical Sensors

Optomechanical accelerometers

42

Krause, A. G., Winger, M., Blasius, T. D., Lin, Q. & Painter, O. A high-resolution microchip optomechanical accelerometer. Nature Photonics 6, 768–772 (2012).

Thermal noise (proof mass)limits accelerometers Using a zipper resonator and proof mass

to measure acceleration.

Page 43: Optomechanical Sensors

43

Page 44: Optomechanical Sensors

Measuring displacement of a nitride beam

44

Gavartin, E., Verlot, P. & Kippenberg, T. J. A hybrid on-chip optomechanical transducer for ultrasensitive force measurements.

Nature Nanotech 7, 509–514 (2012).

74 aN Hz-1/2 at room temperature with a readout stability better than 1% at the minute scale

By applying dissipative feedback (i.e. optomechanical cooling) based on radiation pressure, force spectral density of just 15 aN Hz-1/2 within 35 s of averaging time

Page 45: Optomechanical Sensors

45

Can we build surface-acoustic-wave devices?(Then we can use the past 60 years of SAW techniques)

Page 46: Optomechanical Sensors

Acoustic waves through optical electrostriction

46

Interference of two EM waves can generate pressure that travels at the speed of sound

V

Electromagnetic waves also generate electrostrictive pressure

Electric fields exert pressure on dielectrics = Electrostriction

Speed of soundLight can generate sound

Page 47: Optomechanical Sensors

Brillouin scattering: Scattering of light from acoustic wavesThe strongest nonlinearity known to optics

47

Stationarymirror

Movingmirror

Reflected light isred-shifted

Reflection from a stationary mirror Reflection from a moving mirror

Scattered light isred-shifted

Brillouin light scattering = “Reflection” from a traveling acoustic wave

Sound scatters light

Page 48: Optomechanical Sensors

Stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS) is a feedback process

48

Light can generate soundht

Scattered light

Brillouin scattering ‘generates’ light

Speed of sound

Speed of sound

Sound Light

feedback loop

R. Chiao, C. Townes, Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 12, 1964.

ωP, kP ωS, kS

ωS, kS

ωP, kP

ΩA, kA

ΩA, kA

Occurs at high input power!

“Phase Matching” condition Energy conservation :: ħωP = ħωS + ħΩA

Momentum conservation :: kP = kS + kA

Page 49: Optomechanical Sensors

49

Lasers weretoo new

Good old days!Before Hz was widely adopted.

cps = cycles per second

Page 50: Optomechanical Sensors

Experiments in silica

50

ElectricalspectrumanalyzerDetector

Continuous lightfrom 1550 nm

laser (a few mW)

M. Tomes and T. Carmon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 113601 (2009)

Fixed pump laser frequency 11 GHz

SBS mode

Frequency, MHz

Elec

tric

al s

igna

l pow

er, d

Bm

Tapered opticalfiber waveguide

1 µm thick

Silica glasssphere

vsound

11 GHzacoustic wave

Page 51: Optomechanical Sensors

Generating surface acoustic waves

51

Scientific valueLarger mode (~10 ng)Higher quality factors

(longer phonon lifetime)Greater mechanical amplitude

Surface acoustic wave (SAW) sensors!

Scientific valueSmall mode (~0.5 pg)Low threshold Brillouin lasers

vsound vsound

High frequency10-12 GHz regime

Low frequency10 MHz - 2 GHz regime

G. Bahl et al, Nature Communications 2:403, doi:10.1038/ncomms1412 (2011)

Page 52: Optomechanical Sensors

Forward-scattering SBS for lower frequency acoustic waves

52

F-SBSB-SBS

G. Bahl et al, Nature Communications 2:403, doi:10.1038/ncomms1412 (2011)

Page 53: Optomechanical Sensors

Electrostriction Acousticwave

Brillouin scattering

53

Forward Brillouin scattering enables SAW generation

Pumpopticalfield

Scatteredopticalfield

Pressure vsound

vsound

|E1 + E2|2

G. Bahl et al, Nature Communications 2:403, doi:10.1038/ncomms1412 (2011)

c/n1

c/n2

Page 54: Optomechanical Sensors

54

Experimental observation

SAW-WGMon silica sphere

1550 nminfra-redpump laser

95 MHz spacing

Pump

Stokes

Optical spectrum (95 MHz mode)

Sign

al,A

U

Time, μsTime, us

Oscilloscope

Electricalspectrumanalyzer

Detector

Experimental data

5495.1 95.15

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Frequency, MHz

Mea

sure

d el

ectr

ical

sig

nal,

pW

Experimental data

95 MHz

Sign

al, a

.u.

Page 55: Optomechanical Sensors

Femtometer-level Brownian vibration can be measured

55

Mechanical signal at extremely low input power

Increasingpumppower

Mechanical signal

=95 MHzRayleigh

SAW-WGM

Maximum amplitudecan reach nanometer-levelwith greater input power

G. Bahl et al, Nature Physics, doi:10.1038/nphys2206, Feb 2012

nsilica = 1.45

Page 56: Optomechanical Sensors

Frequency, MHz

Pow

er,dB

mChanging laser wavelength changes oscillation frequency

56G. Bahl et al, Nature Communications, 2:403, doi:10.1038/ncomms1412 (2011)

We generate one oscillation frequency at a timeOr we can scan the laser wavelength to find many frequencies

Page 57: Optomechanical Sensors

There are high transverse order acoustic modes too!

57

Page 58: Optomechanical Sensors

Merging optomechanics and microfluidics

58

“Dry”optomechanics

Microfluidics+

MEMS enabledbio-sensing

Optomechanicalbio/chemical sensors?

Burg et al, Nature 446, 2007Vollmer et al, Nature Methods 5, 2008

Opticalnanoparticle

sensing

Zhu et al, Nature Photonics 4, 2010

Lu et al, PNAS 108, 2011

Carmon et al, PRL 94 (22), 2005

Povinelli et al, Opt. Lett. 30, 2005Rokhsari et al, Opt. Express 13, 2005

...

...

Page 59: Optomechanical Sensors

Opto-Mechano-Fluidic Sensors

59

Taperedfiber

Micro-capillary

70 um

Opticaland

acousticWGR

Qoptical = 160 million Qmechanical = 4700(with liquid core)

Bottle shape enables simultaneous confinement of optical and acoustic WGMs

G. Bahl et al, Nature Communications, 4:1994, doi:10.1038/ncomms2994 (2013)

Page 60: Optomechanical Sensors

OMFR system

60

Taper

Fiber

Fiber

Hydrogentorch

OMFR

Page 61: Optomechanical Sensors

Cavity optomechanics on microfluidic resonators

61

Fluid analyte reservoir

Silicamicrofluidicresonator

CW pumpat 1.5 microns

(NIR diode laser)

Interferometricdetection

RF signal measures

mechanical mode

Outlet

(beat note)

Silica waveguideScattered light

Qmechanical = 4700with liquid coreat 100 MHz

Radiation-pressure drivenbreathing mode

Qmechanical = 2170 with liquid core

at 19 MHz

K.H. Kim, G. Bahl, et alarXiv:1205.5477

G. Bahl et alNat Comms4:19942013

G. Bahl et al, Nature Communications, 4:1994, doi:10.1038/ncomms2994 (2013)

Page 62: Optomechanical Sensors

62

Rayleigh-Lamb mode Transverse mode Longitudinal mode

Capillary whispering-gallery acoustic modesBahl, G., Fan, X. & Carmon, T. Acoustic whispering-gallery modes in optomechanical shells. New Journal of Physics 14, 115026 (2012).

Rayleigh wave Lamb wave

Page 63: Optomechanical Sensors

11.3 GHzExtremely high order

SAW-WGM

99 MHz M = 8SAW-WGM 169 MHz M = 14

SAW-WGM

277 MHz M = 24SAW-WGM 861 MHz

M = 79SAW-WGM

7.4 MHz

H1

M = 2Wineglass

mode

H2

63

Acoustic WGMs

With waterExperiments

G. Bahl et al, Nature Communications, 4:1994, doi:10.1038/ncomms2994 (2013)

Page 64: Optomechanical Sensors

Testing with sucrose solutions

64

Optomechanical interaction can be sustained even when --• Motional mass is high

(i.e. high density liquid)• Fluid-related acoustic energy losses are high

(i.e. high viscosity)

0 10 20 30 401

1.05

1.1

1.15

1.2

Sucrose concentration (% w/w)

Den

sity

(g/

ml)

Known trendExperiment

0 10 20 30 401500

1550

1600

1650

1700

Sucrose concentration (% w/w)

Aco

ustic

vel

ocity

in s

olut

ion

(m/s

)

Known trend

Non-monotonic trend may be explained by multi-parameter variation. (1) Density (2) Viscosity (3) Speed of sound.

Increasing viscosity

G. Bahl et al, Nature Communications, 4:1994, doi:10.1038/ncomms2994 (2013)

Page 65: Optomechanical Sensors

Sensing with radiation pressure modes

65

Radiation-pressure drivenbreathing mode

K.H. Kim, G. Bahl, et alarXiv:1205.5477to appear in Light: Science & Applications, Nov 2013

Page 66: Optomechanical Sensors

Optomechanical viscometer

66

Distilled water

Frequency offset, kHz

Pow

er, a

.u.

Sucrose solution 60% w/w

CF =12.4 MHzQ = 712

Frequency offset, kHzPo

wer

, a.u

.

CF = 11.6 MHzQ = 1977

Increased damping

Extract viscosity by measuring thermal mechanical fluctuations

(Brownian noise)

OMFR

Activeregion

Air

Water

Page 67: Optomechanical Sensors

Rapid screening of cells

67

Fibroblast

Taper(background)

OMFR

1 2 3

Transit of a single monkey kidney fibroblast

OMFR

Activeregion

Air

Water

stay tuned...

Page 68: Optomechanical Sensors

Optomechanical pressure sensor

68

K. Han, J. Kim, G. Bahl“Aerostatically tunable optomechanical oscillators”In review, 2013

Page 69: Optomechanical Sensors

Dual mode (RP + SBS) pressure sensing

69

Potential for f1-f2self-referencing!

Page 70: Optomechanical Sensors

Putting some challenges out thereFiber is virtually free. $0.08/meter.

70

Opticalinput

Opticalread-out

Optomechanical temperature sensor / hydrogen sensor / pressure sensor.

Fiber

Fiber-tip optomechanical sensors

Silica, LiNbO3, CaF2 are high temperature materials

Electromagneticinterference

High temperature

Photons behave linearly in most media

Sensors in harsh environments

Mechanicalinteraction

Surfacewave

Lamb wavesLove waves

Distributed fiber-SAW sensors

Surfacemechanicalinteraction Output:

Optical signals

Input:Interfering optical modes

Page 71: Optomechanical Sensors

71

Sources of noise

Page 72: Optomechanical Sensors

Equipartition theorem - Thermal mechanical fluctuations

72

At thermal equilibrium, the average kinetic energy contained in any degree of freedom is 1/2 kBT at any non-zero temperature T.

Therefore, at any non-zero temperature, a mass-spring-damper system has some “thermal occupation”, i.e. its average kinetic energy is not zero.

x(t)

x(t)

tx = 0

kB = 1.38 x 10-23 J/K

1

2kBT =

1

2k〈x2

zpf 〉

Lowering temperature lowers the thermal mechanical noise. 〈x2zpf 〉

“Zero point fluctuations”

Page 73: Optomechanical Sensors

Estimating magnitude of thermal motion

73

Example --- G. Bahl et al, Nature Physics, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 203-207 (2012)

G. Bahl et al, Nature Physics, doi:10.1038/nphys2206, Feb 2012

Page 74: Optomechanical Sensors

Photon shot noise

74

Incident beam

Reflection

We can use light to measure the position of an object very accurately.

DetectorDetector noise

+Signal of interest

To do a good job in measurement, we want to overcome the noise of our detector, so we increase the power at the source.

Source

Measurementgets better withincreasing input

power

Photons are discrete particles

Detector

Source

But if we pretend that detector noise is zero, we still have photon shot noise.

Detector noise+

Photon shot noise+

Signal of interest

We can also average out this randomness in arrival times by turning up the power.

Measurementgets better withincreasing input

power

Page 75: Optomechanical Sensors

Radiation pressure shot noise

75

Each photon reflection creates a tinyradiation pressure related momentum kick.

Simultaneously, we must also remember that light exerts radiation pressure.Since photon arrival times are erratic, radiation pressure shot noise is generated.

Object positionand momentum get

perturbed

The more photons we use to probe, the more significant these momentum kicks are!

Detector

SourcePhoton shot noise+

Radiation pressureshot noise

+Signal of interest

Measurementgets worse withincreasing input

power

Page 76: Optomechanical Sensors

Standard quantum limit

76

Power of source

Noise inmeasuringposition Measurement noise

RP shot n

oise

Standard quantumlimit

There is an optimum point where the total noise drops to its minimum value.This minimum value is called the standard quantum limit.

There exist techniques to beat this!

Anetsberger, G. et al. Measuring nanomechanical motion with an imprecision below the standard quantum limit. Phys. Rev. A 82, 061804 (2010).

Teufel, J. D., Donner, T., Castellanos-Beltran, M. A., Harlow, J. W. & Lehnert, K. W. Nanomechanical motion measured with animprecision below that at the standardquantum limit. Nature Nanotech 4, 820–823 (2009).

Learn more

Page 77: Optomechanical Sensors

i.e. 6x104 Hz optical frequency fluctuation for a 197 THz (telecom infrared) optical mode.

Thermorefractive noise in optical devices

77

Gorodetsky and Grudinin

The variance of temperature fluctuations u in volume V is

where T is the temperature of the heat bath, k is the Boltzmann constant, ρ is density, and C is specific heat capacity.

Thermorefractive noise in silica microsphere resonatorV = 10-9 cm3

ρ = 2.2 g/cm3

Radius = 50 um

dn/dT = 1.45 x 10-5 K-1 (coeff. of thermal refraction)

Learn more

Page 78: Optomechanical Sensors

Thermal effects in optical resonators

78

What happens to an optical resonator when the temperature is changed?

dn

dT

α

Thermal expansion coeff.

Refractive index change

fr =c/n

2πR/MResonancefrequency

Wavelength

Speed of light

Consider a WGR

Page 79: Optomechanical Sensors

Thermal effects in mechanical resonators

79

What happens to a mechanical resonator when the temperature is changed?

dE

dT

dT

α

Thermal expansion coeff.

Stiffness change (TCE)

vs ∝√

E

ρ

Geometric effect

Strained anchors/tethers

vs ∝ f

Page 80: Optomechanical Sensors

Heating and cooling processes are symmetric

80

Heating

Pumpphoton

Stokesphoton

Phonon

Cooling

Thermalphonon

Pumpphoton

anti-Stokesphoton

When the mirror moves away, momentum conservation causes the reflected light to be red-shifted

Green

Red

Mirror velocity

Energy conservation: Vibration energy increases

When the mirror moves inwards, momentum conservation causes the reflected light to be blue-shifted

Green

Blue

Mirror velocity

Energy conservation: Vibration energy decreases

x(t)

standingwave

incomingwave

Page 81: Optomechanical Sensors

Asymmetry in vibration-scattered light

81

detuning

Frequency

Anti-Stokes

Stokes

Frequency

Anti-StokesStokes

a0(t)a0(t)

a1(t)

a1(t)a1(t)

a1(t)

ΩmΩmΩmΩm

higher order terms

vibrationamplitude

Stokesanti-Stokes

The optical resonance can tilt this energy balance (optical “density of states”)

Page 82: Optomechanical Sensors

2004: Photothermal cooling of a cantilever

82

Tune optical resonances by

modifying cavity length z.

The device can be made to self-oscillate (S)or cool (C)

depending on chosen laser detuning.

+λ/25 detuned(damping)

-λ/25 detuned(anti-damping)

Page 83: Optomechanical Sensors

This experiment used the photothermal “force”

83

“The photon-induced force, which is assumed proportional to the light intensity stored in the cavity, includes of course the radiation pressure but more generally all the n independent light-induced contributions, such as the photothermal (bolometric), radiometric and photo-elastic pressure to name just a few. For instance, a bolometric force FB results from the differential thermal expansion between the silicon lever and the thin gold film.”

Au

Si

+ ΔT

Bending occurs due to differentcoefficient of thermal expansion.

Changes cavity length.

... the essence of cooling is based on the fact that the optically induced forces acting on the lever are delayed with respect to a sudden change in the lever position.

local heatingdue to

photon absorption

ΔL

Page 84: Optomechanical Sensors

Measuring effective temperature

84

Use equipartition theorem to determine temperature

Main messageThe area under the Lorentzian

curves is most important measurementfor determining temperature

Page 85: Optomechanical Sensors

Radiation pressure cooling demonstrated in 2006

85

Page 86: Optomechanical Sensors

We can also cool using Brillouin scattering

86

95 MHz spacing

Pumpresonance

Anti-Stokesresonance

OP OaS

Find candidate optical modes

Acousticalmode FEM

95 MHzSAW-WGM

G. Bahl et al, Nature Physics, Vol. 8, No. 3, p. 203, doi:10.1038/nphys2206 (2012)

Momentum

Freq

uenc

y

Increasing pump power

8 kHz

120 kHz

Increasingpumppower

Mechanical signal (linear scale) Mechanical signal (log scale)

19 K

Page 87: Optomechanical Sensors

There is potential for cooled mechanical sensors

87

Cooling on

Event of interest(e.g. rotation signal in gyro) Time

Background“noise” signal

Background“noise” signal

Signal of interest

Noise + Brownian modes

Sensor bandwidth

Frequency

PSD

Time

Some stochastic background “noise” is present because of Brownian occupation

Brownian vibrations in sensors need to be suppressed k

b

m Sensorreadout

Brownian thermalvibration

Page 88: Optomechanical Sensors

Thank you!

97

Stimulated optomechanical excitation of surface acoustic waves in a microdeviceG. Bahl, J. Zehnpfennig, M. Tomes, T. CarmonNature Communications, 2:403 (2011)

Observation of spontaneous Brillouin coolingG. Bahl, M. Tomes, F. Marquardt, T. CarmonNature Physics, Vol.8, doi:10.1038/nphys2206 (2012)

Surface-waveoptomechanics

Brillouincooling

Acoustic whispering-gallery modes in optomechanical shellsG. Bahl, X. Fan, T. CarmonNew. J. Phys. 14, 115026 (2012).

Acoustic WGMson shells

Opticaland

acousticWGR

Brillouin cavity optomechanics with microfluidic devicesG. Bahl, K.H. Kim, W. Lee, J. Liu, X. Fan, T. CarmonNature Communications, 4:1994 (2013)

Microfluidicoptomechanics

Cavity optomechanics on a microfluidic resonatorK.H. Kim, G. Bahl, W. Lee, J. Liu, M. Tomes, X. Fan, T. CarmonLight: Science & Applications, (to appear) Preview: arXiv:1205.5477

RP-driven microfluidicoptomechanics

Aerostatically tunable optomechanical oscillatorsK. Han, J. Kim, G. Bahlin review

Optomechanicalpressuresensing