optimizing a magnetically shielded solenoid for extended-q
TRANSCRIPT
Optimizing a Magnetically
Shielded Solenoid for Extended-Q
SANS Polarization Analysis Capability
Sidney Molnar, Hamilton College '22
SURF Gaithersburg NCNR 2021
Mentor: Wangchun Chen
1
Overview
BackgroundSANS and vSANS Measurements
3He Cell
OptimizationTurn Configurations
Sensitivity and Resistance
ResultsFigures of Merit
2
Optimizing Uniformity of the Magnetic Field in a Shielded Solenoid
• Initial Calculations• Final Turns• Sensitivity
• Fractional Turns• Off-Axis Scans
8
Initial Parameters for Optimization
8 small compensation coil turns
15 large compensation coil turns
0.8 amps of current through each coil
9
Large End Cap Small End Cap
Initial Parameters for Optimization
8 small compensation coil turns
15 large compensation coil turns
0.8 amps of current through each coil
10
Finding the Final Configuration
• 14 small coil turns
• 22 large coil turns
11
Optimal 8cm Region
Figure of Merit:Line Average = (dBz/dz)/|Bz|
Sensitivity Analysis
How does the position of the solenoid within the mu-metal
shield affect our field?
12
Optimal 8cm Region
1.1x10-4 cm-1
Adjustments for Fractional Turn Configurations
• Parallel Resistance =
(Coil Current * Coil Resistance)
Parallel Current
• Parallel Resistance: ~2.6 ohms
13
Optimal 8cm Region
Off-Axial Scans
Scanning the Field for Two Dimensions Calculating a Volume Average
14
Optimal 8cm Region
Optimal 8cm Region
1.3x10-4 cm-1
Volume Avg Parameter:(B_Grad/B)2
Horizontal Field Magnetic Gradient
Summary of Our Results
Extended Q-Range for small-scale nanomagnetic research
Optimal uniformity for longer relaxation time of 3He cell
Final Figures of Merit reduced significantly from our original calculations
15
AcknowledgementsMany thanks to:Wangchun,
Shannon, and Hannah
(NIST NCNR)
Gordon and Brian (Hamilton College)
Joe, Susana, Julie, Brandi (SURF
Directors)
CHRNSfor making this
summer's research possible.
16