optimization methods (lecture india)

7/28/2019 Optimization Methods (Lecture India)

1/267

Optimization Methods: Introduction and Basic Concepts - Learning Objectives

Module 1: Introduction and Basic Concepts

Learning Objectives

Optimization is the act of obtaining the best result under the given circumstances. In design

construction and maintenance of any engineering system, many technological and managerial

decisions have to be taken at several stages. The ultimate goal of all such decisions is either

to minimize the effort required or to maximize the desired benefit. Hence optimization can be

defined as the process of finding the conditions that give the minimum or maximum value of

a function, where the function represents the effort required or the desired benefit.

This module starts with a glance through the historical development of optimization methods.

Engineering applications of optimizations are scanned through from which one would get a

broad picture of the multitude of applications, the optimization methods have. The Art of

modeling is briefly explained with the various phases involved in modeling. In the second

lecture various components of the Optimization problem are discussed and summarized with

steps involved in formulating a mathematical programming problem. In the third lecture the

optimization problems are classified under various criteria to enable choosing an appropriate

model applicable to different types of optimization problems. In the final lecture a briefintroduction to the classical and advanced optimization techniques in use are given.

At the end of the module the reader will be able to

1. Understand the need and origin of the optimization methods.2. Get a broader picture of the various applications of optimization methods used in

engineering.

3. Define an optimization problem and its various components.4. Formulate optimization problems as mathematical programming problems.5. Classify optimization problems to suitably choose the method needed to solve the

particular type of problem.

6. Briefly learn about classical and advanced techniques in optimizations.

D Nagesh Kumar, IISc, Bangalore M1LO


2/267

Optimization Methods: Introduction and Basic Concepts 1

Module 1 Lecture Notes 1

Historical Development and Model Building

Introduction

In this lecture, historical development of optimization methods is glanced through. Apart

from the major developments, some recently developed novel approaches, such as, goal

programming for multi-objective optimization, simulated annealing, genetic algorithms, and

neural network methods are briefly mentioned tracing their origin. Engineering applications

of optimization with different modeling approaches are scanned through from which one

would get a broad picture of the multitude applications of optimization techniques.

Historical Development

The existence of optimization methods can be traced to the days of Newton, Lagrange, and

Cauchy. The development of differential calculus methods for optimization was possible

because of the contributions of Newton and Leibnitz to calculus. The foundations of calculus

of variations, which deals with the minimization of functions, were laid by Bernoulli, Euler,

Lagrange, and Weistrass. The method of optimization for constrained problems, which

involve the addition of unknown multipliers, became known by the name of its inventor,

Lagrange. Cauchy made the first application of the steepest descent method to solve

unconstrained optimization problems. By the middle of the twentieth century, the high-speed

digital computers made implementation of the complex optimization procedures possible and

stimulated further research on newer methods. Spectacular advances followed, producing a

massive literature on optimization techniques. This advancement also resulted in the

emergence of several well defined new areas in optimization theory.

Some of the major developments in the area of numerical methods of unconstrained

optimization are outlined here with a few milestones.

Development of the simplex method by Dantzig in 1947 for linear programmingproblems

The enunciation of the principle of optimality in 1957 by Bellman for dynamicprogramming problems,

D Nagesh Kumar, IISc, Bangalore M1L1


3/267


Work by Kuhn and Tucker in 1951 on the necessary and sufficient conditions for theoptimal solution of programming problems laid the foundation for later research in

non-linear programming.

The contributions of Zoutendijk and Rosen to nonlinear programming during the early1960s have been very significant.

Work of Carroll and Fiacco and McCormick facilitated many difficult problems to besolved by using the well-known techniques of unconstrained optimization.

Geometric programming was developed in the 1960s by Duffin, Zener, and Peterson. Gomory did pioneering work in integer programming, one of the most exciting and

rapidly developing areas of optimization. The reason for this is that most real world

applications fall under this category of problems.

Dantzig and Charnes and Cooper developed stochastic programming techniques andsolved problems by assuming design parameters to be independent and normally

distributed.

The necessity to optimize more than one objective or goal while satisfying the physical

limitations led to the development of multi-objective programming methods. Goal

programming is a well-known technique for solving specific types of multi-objective

optimization problems. The goal programming was originally proposed for linear problems

by Charnes and Cooper in 1961. The foundation of game theory was laid by von Neumann in

1928 and since then the technique has been applied to solve several mathematical, economic

and military problems. Only during the last few years has game theory been applied to solve

engineering problems.

Simulated annealing, genetic algorithms, and neural network methods represent a new class

of mathematical programming techniques that have come into prominence during the last

decade. Simulated annealing is analogous to the physical process of annealing of metals and

glass. The genetic algorithms are search techniques based on the mechanics of natural

selection and natural genetics. Neural network methods are based on solving the problem

using the computing power of a network of interconnected neuron processors.



4/267


Engineering applications of optimization

To indicate the widespread scope of the subject, some typical applications in different

engineering disciplines are given below.

Design of civil engineering structures such as frames, foundations, bridges, towers,chimneys and dams for minimum cost.

Design of minimum weight structures for earth quake, wind and other types ofrandom loading.

Optimal plastic design of frame structures (e.g., to determine the ultimate momentcapacity for minimum weight of the frame).

Design of water resources systems for obtaining maximum benefit. Design of optimum pipeline networks for process industry. Design of aircraft and aerospace structure for minimum weight Finding the optimal trajectories of space vehicles. Optimum design of linkages, cams, gears, machine tools, and other mechanical

components.

Selection of machining conditions in metal-cutting processes for minimizing theproduct cost.

Design of material handling equipment such as conveyors, trucks and cranes forminimizing cost.

Design of pumps, turbines and heat transfer equipment for maximum efficiency. Optimum design of electrical machinery such as motors, generators and transformers. Optimum design of electrical networks. Optimum design of control systems. Optimum design of chemical processing equipments and plants. Selection of a site for an industry. Planning of maintenance and replacement of equipment to reduce operating costs. Inventory control. Allocation of resources or services among several activities to maximize the benefit. Controlling the waiting and idle times in production lines to reduce the cost of

production. Planning the best strategy to obtain maximum profit in the presence of a competitor.



5/267


Designing the shortest route to be taken by a salesperson to visit various cities in asingle tour.

Optimal production planning, controlling and scheduling.

Analysis of statistical data and building empirical models to obtain the most accuraterepresentation of the statistical phenomenon.

However, the list is incomplete.

Art of Modeling: Model Building

Development of an optimization model can be divided into five major phases.

Data collection Problem definition and formulation Model development Model validation and evaluation of performance Model application and interpretation

Data collection may be time consuming but is the fundamental basis of the model-building

process. The availability and accuracy of data can have considerable effect on the accuracy of

the model and on the ability to evaluate the model.

The problem definition and formulation includes the steps: identification of the decision

variables; formulation of the model objective(s) and the formulation of the model constraints.

In performing these steps the following are to be considered.

Identify the important elements that the problem consists of. Determine the number of independent variables, the number of equations required to

describe the system, and the number of unknown parameters.

Evaluate the structure and complexity of the model Select the degree of accuracy required of the model

Model development includes the mathematical description, parameter estimation, input

development, and software development. The model development phase is an iterative

process that may require returning to the model definition and formulation phase.

The model validation and evaluationphase is checking the performance of the model as a

whole. Model validation consists of validation of the assumptions and parameters of the



6/267


model. The performance of the model is to be evaluated using standard performance

measures such as Root mean squared error and R2 value. A sensitivity analysis should be

performed to test the model inputs and parameters. This phase also is an iterative process and

may require returning to the model definition and formulation phase. One important aspect of

this process is that in most cases data used in the formulation process should be different

from that used in validation. Another point to keep in mind is that no single validation

process is appropriate for all models.

Model application and implementation include the use of the model in the particular area

of the solution and the translation of the results into operating instructions issued in

understandable form to the individuals who will administer the recommended system.

Different modeling techniques are developed to meet the requirements of different types of

optimization problems. Major categories of modeling approaches are: classical optimization

techniques, linear programming, nonlinear programming, geometric programming, dynamic

programming, integer programming, stochastic programming, evolutionary algorithms, etc.

These modeling approaches will be discussed in subsequent modules of this course.



7/267

Optimization Methods: Introduction and Basic concepts 1


Optimization Problem and Model Formulation

Introduction

In the previous lecture we studied the evolution of optimization methods and their

engineering applications. A brief introduction was also given to the art of modeling. In this

lecture we will study the Optimization problem, its various components and its formulation as

a mathematical programming problem.

Basic components of an optimization problem:

An objective function expresses the main aim of the modelwhich is either to be minimized

or maximized. For example, in a manufacturing process, the aim may be to maximize the

profitorminimize the cost. In comparing the data prescribed by a user-defined model with the

observed data, the aim is minimizing the total deviation of the predictions based on the model

from the observed data. In designing a bridge pier, the goal is to maximize the strength and

minimize size.

A set of unknowns or variables control the value of the objective function. In the

manufacturing problem, the variables may include the amounts of different resources usedor

the time spent on each activity. In fitting-the-data problem, the unknowns are the parameters

of the model. In the pier design problem, the variables are the shape and dimensions of the

pier.

A set of constraints are those which allow the unknowns to take on certain values but

exclude others. In the manufacturing problem, one cannot spend negative amount of time on

any activity, so one constraint is that the "time" variables are to be non-negative. In the pier

design problem, one would probably want to limit the breadthof the base and to constrain its

size.

The optimization problem is then to find values of the variables that minimize or maximize

the objective function while satisfying the constraints.

Objective Function

As already stated, the objective function is the mathematical function one wants to maximize

or minimize, subject to certain constraints. Many optimization problems have a single



8/267


objective function. (When they don't they can often be reformulated so that they do) The two

exceptions are:

No objective function. In some cases (for example, design of integrated circuitlayouts), the goal is to find a set of variables that satisfies the constraints of the model.

The user does not particularly want to optimize anything and so there is no reason to

define an objective function. This type of problems is usually called a feasibility

problem.

Multiple objective functions. In some cases, the user may like to optimize a number ofdifferent objectives concurrently. For instance, in the optimal design of panel of a

door or window, it would be good to minimize weight and maximize strength

simultaneously. Usually, the different objectives are not compatible; the variables that

optimize one objective may be far from optimal for the others. In practice, problems

with multiple objectives are reformulated as single-objective problems by either

forming a weighted combination of the different objectives or by treating some of the

objectives as constraints.

Statement of an optimization problem

An optimization or a mathematical programming problem can be stated as follows:

To find X = whichminimizesf(X) (1.1)

nx

x

x

.

.

2

1

Subject to the constraints

gi(X) 0 , i = 1, 2, ., m

lj(X) 0= , j = 1, 2, .,p

where X is an n-dimensional vector called the design vector, f(X) is called the objective

function, and gi(X) and lj(X) are known as inequality and equality constraints, respectively.

The number of variables n and the number of constraints m and/orp need not be related in

any way. This type problem is called a constrained optimization problem.



9/267


If the locus of all points satisfying f(X) = a constant c, is considered, it can form a family of

surfaces in the design space called the objective function surfaces. When drawn with the

constraint surfaces as shown in Fig 1 we can identify the optimum point (maxima). This is

possible graphically only when the number of design variables is two. When we have three or

more design variables because of complexity in the objective function surface, we have to

solve the problem as a mathematical problem and this visualization is not possible.

.

Optimumpoint

f = C3

f = C2

f= C4

f = C5

C1 > C2 >C3 >C4 ..> Cn

f = C1

Fig 1

Optimization problems can be defined without any constraints as well.

To find X = whichminimizesf(X) (1.2)

nx

x

x

.

.

2

1

Such problems are called unconstrained optimization problems. The field of unconstrained

optimization is quite a large and prominent one, for which a lot of algorithms and software

are available.



10/267


VariablesThese are essential. If there are no variables, we cannot define the objective function and the

problem constraints. In many practical problems, one cannot choose the design variable

arbitrarily. They have to satisfy certain specified functional and other requirements.

Constraints

Constraints are not essential. It's been argued that almost all problems really do have

constraints. For example, any variable denoting the "number of objects" in a system can only

be useful if it is less than the number of elementary particles in the known universe! In

practice though, answers that make good sense in terms of the underlying physical or

economic criteria can often be obtained without putting constraints on the variables.

Design constraints are restrictions that must be satisfied to produce an acceptable design.

Constraints can be broadly classified as:

1) Behavioral or Functional constraints: These represent limitations on the behaviorperformance of the system.

2) Geometric or Side constraints: These represent physical limitations on designvariables such as availability, fabricability, and transportability.

For example, for the retaining wall design shown in the Fig 2, the base width W cannot be

taken smaller than a certain value due to stability requirements. The depth D below the

ground level depends on the soil pressure coefficients Ka and Kp. Since these constraints

depend on the performance of the retaining wall they are called behavioral constraints. The

number of anchors provided along a cross section Ni cannot be any real number but has to be

a whole number. Similarly thickness of reinforcement used is controlled by supplies from the

manufacturer. Hence this is a side constraint.



11/267


D

Ni no. of anchors

W

Fig. 2

Constraint Surfaces

Consider the optimization problem presented in eq. 1.1 with only the inequality constraint

gi(X) . The set of values of X that satisfy the equation g0 i(X) 0 forms a boundary surface

in the design space called a constraint surface. This will be a (n-1) dimensional subspace

where n is the number of design variables. The constraint surface divides the design space

into two regions: one with gi(X) (feasible region) and the other in which g0< i(X) > 0

(infeasible region). The points lying on the hyper surface will satisfy gi(X) =0. The collection

of all the constraint surfaces gi(X) = 0,j= 1, 2, , m, which separates the acceptable region is

called the composite constraint surface.

Fig 3 shows a hypothetical two-dimensional design space where the feasible region is

denoted by hatched lines. The two-dimensional design space is bounded by straight lines as

shown in the figure. This is the case when the constraints are linear. However, constraints

may be nonlinear as well and the design space will be bounded by curves in that case. A

design point that lies on more than one constraint surface is called a bound point, and the

associated constraint is called an active constraint. Free points are those that do not lie on any

constraint surface. The design points that lie in the acceptable or unacceptable regions can be

classified as following:

1. Free and acceptable point2. Free and unacceptable point



12/267


3. Bound and acceptable point4. Bound and unacceptable point.

Examples of each case are shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Boundunacceptable

point.

Behaviorconstraint

g2 0

.

Infeasible

region

Feasibleregion

Behaviorconstraint

g1 0

Side

constraintg3 0

Bound

acceptable point.

.

Free acceptable

pointFree unacceptable

point

Formulation of design problems as mathematical programming problems

In mathematics, the term optimization, ormathematical programming, refers to the study

of problems in which one seeks to minimize or maximize a real function by systematically

choosing the values of real or integer variables from within an allowed set. This problem can

be represented in the following way

Given: a functionf:A R from some setA to the real numbers

Sought: an element x0 inA such that f(x0) f(x) for allx inA ("minimization") or such that

f(x0) f(x) for allx inA ("maximization").

Such a formulation is called an optimization problem or a mathematical programming

problem (a term not directly related to computer programming, but still in use for example,



13/267


in linear programming (see module 3)). Many real-world and theoretical problems may be

modeled in this general framework.

Typically,A is some subset of the Euclidean space Rn, often specified by a set ofconstraints,

equalities or inequalities that the members ofA have to satisfy. The elements ofA are called

candidate solutions orfeasible solutions. The functionfis called an objective function, orcost

function. A feasible solution that minimizes (or maximizes, if that is the goal) the objective

function is called an optimal solution. The domainA offis called the search space.

Generally, when the feasible region or the objective function of the problem does not present

convexity (refer module 2), there may be several local minima and maxima, where a local

minimum x*

is defined as a point for which there exists some > 0 so that for all x such that

;

and

that is to say, on some region around x* all the function values are greater than or equal to the

value at that point. Local maxima are defined similarly.

A large number of algorithms proposed for solving non-convex problems including themajority of commercially available solvers are not capable of making a distinction between

local optimal solutions and rigorous optimal solutions, and will treat the former as the actual

solutions to the original problem. The branch of applied mathematics and numerical analysis

that is concerned with the development of deterministic algorithms that are capable of

guaranteeing convergence in finite time to the actual optimal solution of a non-convex

problem is called global optimization.

Problem formulation

Problem formulation is normally the most difficult part of the process. It is the selection of

design variables, constraints, objective function(s), and models of the discipline/design.

Selection of design variables

A design variable, that takes a numeric or binary value, is controllable from the point of view

of the designer. For instance, the thickness of a structural member can be considered a design

variable. Design variables can be continuous (such as the length of a cantilever beam),



14/267


discrete (such as the number of reinforcement bars used in a beam), or Boolean. Design

problems with continuous variables are normally solved more easily.

Design variables are often bounded, that is, they have maximum and minimum values.

Depending on the adopted method, these bounds can be treated as constraints or separately.

Selection of constraints

A constraint is a condition that must be satisfied to render the design to be feasible. An

example of a constraint in beam design is that the resistance offered by the beam at points of

loading must be equal to or greater than the weight of structural member and the load

supported. In addition to physical laws, constraints can reflect resource limitations, user

requirements, or bounds on the validity of the analysis models. Constraints can be used

explicitly by the solution algorithm or can be incorporated into the objective, by using

Lagrange multipliers.

Objectives

An objective is a numerical value that is to be maximized or minimized. For example, a

designer may wish to maximize profit or minimize weight. Many solution methods work only

with single objectives. When using these methods, the designer normally weights the various

objectives and sums them to form a single objective. Other methods allow multi-objectiveoptimization (module 8), such as the calculation of a Pareto front.

Models

The designer has to also choose models to relate the constraints and the objectives to the

design variables. These models are dependent on the discipline involved. They may be

empirical models, such as a regression analysis of aircraft prices, theoretical models, such as

from computational fluid dynamics, or reduced-order models of either of these. In choosing

the models the designer must trade-off fidelity with the time required for analysis.

The multidisciplinary nature of most design problems complicates model choice and

implementation. Often several iterations are necessary between the disciplines analyses in

order to find the values of the objectives and constraints. As an example, the aerodynamic

loads on a bridge affect the structural deformation of the supporting structure. The structural

deformation in turn changes the shape of the bridge and hence the aerodynamic loads. Thus,

it can be considered as a cyclic mechanism. Therefore, in analyzing a bridge, the



15/267


aerodynamic and structural analyses must be run a number of times in turn until the loads and

deformation converge.

Representation in standard form

Once the design variables, constraints, objectives, and the relationships between them have

been chosen, the problem can be expressed as shown in equation 1.1

Maximization problems can be converted to minimization problems by multiplying the

objective by -1. Constraints can be reversed in a similar manner. Equality constraints can be

replaced by two inequality constraints.

Problem solution

The problem is normally solved choosing the appropriate techniques from those available in

the field of optimization. These include gradient-based algorithms, population-based

algorithms, or others. Very simple problems can sometimes be expressed linearly; in that case

the techniques of linear programming are applicable.

Gradient-based methods

Newton's method Steepest descent Conjugate gradient Sequential quadratic programming

Population-based methods

Genetic algorithms Particle swarm optimization

Other methods

Random search Grid search Simulated annealing

Most of these techniques require large number of evaluations of the objectives and the

constraints. The disciplinary models are often very complex and can take significant amount

of time for a single evaluation. The solution can therefore be extremely time-consuming.



16/267


Many of the optimization techniques are adaptable to parallel computing. Much of the current

research is focused on methods of decreasing the computation time.

The following steps summarize the general procedure used to formulate and solve

optimization problems. Some problems may not require that the engineer follow the steps in

the exact order, but each of the steps should be considered in the process.

1) Analyze the process itself to identify the process variables and specific characteristicsof interest, i.e., make a list of all the variables.

2) Determine the criterion for optimization and specify the objective function in terms ofthe above variables together with coefficients.

3) Develop via mathematical expressions a valid process model that relates the input-output variables of the process and associated coefficients. Include both equality and

inequality constraints. Use well known physical principles such as mass balances,

energy balance, empirical relations, implicit concepts and external restrictions.

Identify the independent and dependent variables to get the number of degrees of

freedom.

4) If the problem formulation is too large in scope: break it up into manageable parts, or simplify the objective function and the model

5) Apply a suitable optimization technique for mathematical statement of the problem.6) Examine the sensitivity of the result, to changes in the values of the parameters in the

problem and the assumptions.



17/267

Optimization Methods: Introduction and Basic Concepts

D Nagesh Kumar, IISc, Bangalore

1

M1L3


Classification of Optimization Problems

Introduction

In the previous lecture we studied the basics of an optimization problem and its formulation

as a mathematical programming problem. In this lecture we look at the various criteria for

classification of optimization problems.

Optimization problems can be classified based on the type of constraints, nature of design

variables, physical structure of the problem, nature of the equations involved, deterministic

nature of the variables, permissible value of the design variables, separability of the functions

and number of objective functions. These classifications are briefly discussed below.

Classification based on existence of constraints.

Under this category optimizations problems can be classified into two groups as follows:

Constrained optimization problems: which are subject to one or more constraints.

Unconstrained optimization problems: in which no constraints exist.

Classification based on the nature of the design variables.

There are two broad categories in this classification.

(i) In the first category the objective is to find a set of design parameters that makes a

prescribed function of these parameters minimum or maximum subject to certain constraints.

For example to find the minimum weight design of a strip footing with two loads shown in

Fig 1 (a) subject to a limitation on the maximum settlement of the structure can be stated as

follows.

Find X =

d

bwhich minimizes

f(X) =h(b,d)

Subject to the constraints (s X ) max ; b 0 ; d 0

where s is the settlement of the footing. Such problems are called parameter or static

optimization problems.


18/267



2

M1L3

It may be noted that, for this particular example, the length of the footing (l), the loads P1 and

P2 and the distance between the loads are assumed to be constant and the required

optimization is achieved by varying b and d.

(ii) In the second category of problems, the objective is to find a set of design parameters,

which are all continuous functions of some other parameter that minimizes an objective

function subject to a set of constraints. If the cross sectional dimensions of the rectangular

footings are allowed to vary along its length as shown in Fig 3.1 (b), the optimization

problem can be stated as :

Find X(t) =

)(

)(

td

tbwhich minimizes

f(X) =g( b(t), d(t) )


(s X(t)) max 0 t l

b(t) 0 0 t l

d(t) 0 0 t l

The length of the footing (l) the loads P1 and P2 , the distance between the loads are assumed

to be constant and the required optimization is achieved by varying b and d along the length l.

Here the design variables are functions of the length parameter t. this type of problem, where

each design variable is a function of one or more parameters, is known as trajectory or

dynamic optimization problem.

(a) (b)

Figure 1

l l

P1

P2

d

b

P2

P1

b(t)

d(t)

t


19/267



3

M1L3

Classification based on the physical structure of the problem

Based on the physical structure, optimization problems are classified as optimal control and

non-optimal control problems.

(i) Optimal control problems

An optimal control (OC) problem is a mathematical programming problem involving a

number of stages, where each stage evolves from the preceding stage in a prescribed manner.

It is defined by two types of variables: the control or design and state variables. The control

variables define the system and controls how one stage evolves into the next. The state

variables describe the behavior or status of the system at any stage. The problem is to find a

set of control variables such that the total objective function (also known as the performance

index, PI) over all stages is minimized, subject to a set of constraints on the control and state

variables. An OC problem can be stated as follows:

Find X which minimizesf(X) = ),(1

ii

l

i

i yxf=


1),( +=+ iiiii yyyxq i = 1, 2, ., l

0)( jj xg , j = 1, 2, ., l

0)( kk yh , k= 1, 2, ., l

Wherexi is the ith control variable,yi is the ith state variable, andfi is the contribution of the

ith stage to the total objective function. gj, hk, and qi are the functions ofxj,yj ;xk,yk andxi and

yi, respectively, and l is the total number of states. The control and state variables xi and yi

can be vectors in some cases.

(ii) Problems which are not optimal control problems are called non-optimal control

problems.

Classification based on the nature of the equations involved

Based on the nature of equations for the objective function and the constraints, optimization

problems can be classified as linear, nonlinear, geometric and quadratic programming

problems. The classification is very useful from a computational point of view since many


20/267



4

M1L3

predefined special methods are available for effective solution of a particular type of

problem.

(i)Linear programming problem

If the objective function and all the constraints are linear functions of the design variables,

the optimization problem is called a linear programming problem (LPP). A linear

programming problem is often stated in the standard form :

Find X =

nx

x

x

.

.

2

1

Which maximizesf(X) = i

n

i

ixc=1


ji

n

i

ij bxa ==1

, j = 1, 2, . . . , m

xi 0 , j = 1, 2, . . . , m

where ci, aij, and bj are constants.

(ii)Nonlinear programming problem

If any of the functions among the objectives and constraint functions is nonlinear, the

problem is called a nonlinear programming (NLP)problem. This is the most general form of

a programming problem and all other problems can be considered as special cases of the NLP

problem.

(iii) Geometric programming problem

A geometric programming (GMP) problem is one in which the objective function and

constraints are expressed as polynomials in X. A function h(X) is called apolynomial (with

m terms) ifh can be expressed as

nma

nmama

mna

n

aana

n

aa

xxxcxxxcxxxcXh LLLL2

21

1222

212

12121

211

11)( +++=


21/267



5

M1L3

where cj ( mj ,,1L= ) and aij ( ni ,,1L= and mj ,,1L= ) are constants with 0jc and

0ix .

Thus GMPproblems can be posed as follows:

Find X which minimizes

f(X) = ,0

1 1

= =

N

j

n

i

ija

ijxc C cj > 0, xi > 0

subject to

gk(X) = ,01 1

= =

>

kN

j

n

i

ijkqijk

xa C ajk> 0, xi > 0, k= 1,2,..,m

whereN0 andNkdenote the number of terms in the objective function and in the kth

constraint

function, respectively.

(iv) Quadratic programming problem

A quadratic programming problem is the best behaved nonlinear programming problem with

a quadratic objective function and linear constraints and is concave (for maximization

problems). It can be solved by suitably modifying the linear programming techniques. It is

usually formulated as follows:

F(X) = = ==

++

n

i

n

j

jiij

n

i

ii xxQxqc1 11

Subject to

,1

j

n

i

iij bxa ==

j = 1,2,.,m

xi 0 , i = 1,2,.,n

where c, qi, Qij, aij, and bj are constants.

Classification based on the permissible values of the decision variables

Under this classification, objective functions can be classified as integer and real-valued

programming problems.


22/267



6

M1L3

(i)Integer programming problem

If some or all of the design variables of an optimization problem are restricted to take only

integer (or discrete) values, the problem is called an integer programming problem. For

example, the optimization is to find number of articles needed for an operation with least

effort. Thus, minimization of the effort required for the operation being the objective, the

decision variables, i.e. the number of articles used can take only integer values. Other

restrictions on minimum and maximum number of usable resources may be imposed.

(ii)Real-valued programming problem

A real-valued problem is that in which it is sought to minimize or maximize a real function

by systematically choosing the values of real variables from within an allowed set. When the

allowed set contains only real values, it is called a real-valued programming problem.

Classification based on deterministic nature of the variables

Under this classification, optimization problems can be classified as deterministic or

stochastic programming problems.

(i) Stochastic programming problem

In this type of an optimization problem, some or all the design variables are expressed

probabilistically (non-deterministic or stochastic). For example estimates of life span of

structures which have probabilistic inputs of the concrete strength and load capacity is a

stochastic programming problem as one can only estimate stochastically the life span of the

structure.

(ii)Deterministic programming problem

In this type of problems all the design variables are deterministic.

Classification based on separability of the functions

Based on this classification, optimization problems can be classified as separable and non-

separable programming problems based on the separability of the objective and constraint

functions.

(i) Separable programming problems

In this type of a problem the objective function and the constraints are separable. A function

is said to be separable if it can be expressed as the sum of n single-variable functions,( ) ( ) ( )

nnixfxfxf ,..., 221 , i.e.


23/267



7

M1L3

( )=

=

n

i

ii xfXf1

)(

and separable programming problem can be expressed in standard form as :

Find X whichminimizes ( )=

=

n

i

ii xfXf1

)(

subject to

( ) jn

i

iijj bxgXg = =1

)( , j = 1,2,. . . , m

where bj is a constant.

Classification based on the number of objective functions

Under this classification, objective functions can be classified as single-objective and multi-

objective programming problems.

(i)Single-objective programming problem in which there is only a single objective function.

(ii)Multi-objective programming problem

A multiobjective programming problem can be stated as follows:

Find X which minimizes ( ) ( ) ( )XfXfXf k,..., 21

Subject to

gj(X) 0 , j = 1, 2, . . . , m

wheref1, f2, . . . fkdenote the objective functions to be minimized simultaneously.

For example in some design problems one might have to minimize the cost and weight of the

structural member for economy and, at the same time, maximize the load carrying capacity

under the given constraints.


24/267



Classical and Advanced Techniques for Optimization

In the previous lecture having understood the various classifications of optimization

problems, let us move on to understand the classical and advanced optimization techniques.

Classical Optimization Techniques

The classical optimization techniques are useful in finding the optimum solution or

unconstrained maxima or minima of continuous and differentiable functions. These are

analytical methods and make use of differential calculus in locating the optimum solution.

The classical methods have limited scope in practical applications as some of them involve

objective functions which are not continuous and/or differentiable. Yet, the study of these

classical techniques of optimization form a basis for developing most of the numerical

techniques that have evolved into advanced techniques more suitable to todays practical

problems. These methods assume that the function is differentiable twice with respect to the

design variables and that the derivatives are continuous. Three main types of problems can be

handled by the classical optimization techniques, viz., single variable functions, multivariable

functions with no constraints and multivariable functions with both equality and inequality

constraints. For problems with equality constraints the Lagrange multiplier method can be

used. If the problem has inequality constraints, the Kuhn-Tucker conditions can be used to

identify the optimum solution. These methods lead to a set of nonlinear simultaneous

equations that may be difficult to solve. These classical methods of optimization are further

discussed in Module 2.

The other methods of optimization include

Linear programming: studies the case in which the objective functionfis linear andthe set A is specified using only linear equalities and inequalities. (A is the design

variable space)

Integer programming: studies linear programs in which some or all variables areconstrained to take on integer values.

Quadratic programming: allows the objective function to have quadratic terms,while the set A must be specified with linear equalities and inequalities.



25/267


Nonlinear programming: studies the general case in which the objective function orthe constraints or both contain nonlinear parts.

Stochastic programming: studies the case in which some of the constraints dependon random variables.

Dynamic programming: studies the case in which the optimization strategy is basedon splitting the problem into smaller sub-problems.

Combinatorial optimization: is concerned with problems where the set of feasiblesolutions is discrete or can be reduced to a discrete one.

Infinite-dimensional optimization: studies the case when the set of feasible solutionsis a subset of an infinite-dimensional space, such as a space of functions.

Constraint satisfaction: studies the case in which the objective functionfis constant(this is used in artificial intelligence, particularly in automated reasoning).

Most of these techniques will be discussed in subsequent modules.

Advanced Optimization Techniques

Hill climbingHill climbing is a graph search algorithm where the current path is extended with a

successor node which is closer to the solution than the end of the current path.

In simple hill climbing, the first closer node is chosen whereas in steepest ascent hill

climbing all successors are compared and the closest to the solution is chosen. Both

forms fail if there is no closer node. This may happen if there are local maxima in the

search space which are not solutions. Steepest ascent hill climbing is similar to best

first search but the latter tries all possible extensions of the current path in order,

whereas steepest ascent only tries one.

Hill climbing is used widely in artificial intelligence fields, for reaching a goal state

from a starting node. Choice of next node starting node can be varied to give a

number of related algorithms.



26/267


Simulated annealingThe name and inspiration come from annealing process in metallurgy, a technique

involving heating and controlled cooling of a material to increase the size of its

crystals and reduce their defects. The heat causes the atoms to become unstuck from

their initial positions (a local minimum of the internal energy) and wander randomly

through states of higher energy; the slow cooling gives them more chances of finding

configurations with lower internal energy than the initial one.

In the simulated annealing method, each point of the search space is compared to a

state of some physical system, and the function to be minimized is interpreted as the

internal energy of the system in that state. Therefore the goal is to bring the system,

from an arbitrary initial state, to a state with the minimum possible energy.

Genetic algorithmsA genetic algorithm (GA) is a search technique used in computer science to find

approximate solutions to optimization and search problems. Specifically it falls into

the category of local search techniques and is therefore generally an incomplete

search. Genetic algorithms are a particular class of evolutionary algorithms that use

techniques inspired by evolutionary biology such as inheritance, mutation, selection,

and crossover (also called recombination).

Genetic algorithms are typically implemented as a computer simulation. in which a

population of abstract representations (called chromosomes) of candidate solutions

(called individuals) to an optimization problem, evolves toward better solutions.

Traditionally, solutions are represented in binary as strings of 0s and 1s, but different

encodings are also possible. The evolution starts from a population of completely

random individuals and occur in generations. In each generation, the fitness of the

whole population is evaluated, multiple individuals are stochastically selected from

the current population (based on their fitness), and modified (mutated or recombined)

to form a new population. The new population is then used in the next iteration of the

algorithm.



27/267


Ant colony optimizationIn the real world, ants (initially) wander randomly, and upon finding food return to

their colony while laying down pheromone trails. If other ants find such a path, they

are likely not to keep traveling at random, but instead follow the trail laid by earlier

ants, returning and reinforcing it, if they eventually find any food.

Over time, however, the pheromone trail starts to evaporate, thus reducing its

attractive strength. The more time it takes for an ant to travel down the path and back

again, the more time the pheromones have to evaporate. A short path, by comparison,

gets marched over faster, and thus the pheromone density remains high as it is laid on

the path as fast as it can evaporate. Pheromone evaporation has also the advantage of

avoiding the convergence to a local optimal solution. If there was no evaporation at

all, the paths chosen by the first ants would tend to be excessively attractive to the

following ones. In that case, the exploration of the solution space would be

constrained.

Thus, when one ant finds a good (short) path from the colony to a food source, other

ants are more likely to follow that path, and such positive feedback eventually leaves

all the ants following a single path. The idea of the ant colony algorithm is to mimic

this behavior with "simulated ants" walking around the search space representing the

problem to be solved.

Ant colony optimization algorithms have been used to produce near-optimal solutions

to the traveling salesman problem. They have an advantage over simulated annealing

and genetic algorithm approaches when the graph may change dynamically. The ant

colony algorithm can be run continuously and can adapt to changes in real time. This

is of interest in network routing and urban transportation systems.



28/267


References / Further Reading:

1. Deb K.,Multi-Objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms, First Edition, JohnWiley & Sons Pte Ltd, 2002.

2. Deb K., Optimization for Engineering Design Algorithms and Examples, Prentice Hallof India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 1995.

3. Dorigo M., and T. Stutzle,Ant Colony Optimization, Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., NewDelhi, 2005.

4. Hillier F.S. and G.J. Lieberman, Operations Research, CBS Publishers & Distributors,New Delhi, 1987.

5. Jain S.K. and V.P. Singh, Water Resources Systems Planning and Management, ElsevierB.V., The Netherlands, 2003.

6. Loucks, D.P., J.R. Stedinger, and D.A. Haith, Water Resources Systems Planning andAnalysis, Prentice Hall, N.J., 1981.

7. Mays, L.W. and K. Tung, Hydrosystems Engineering and Management, McGraw-HillInc., New York, 1992.

8. Rao S.S., Engineering Optimization Theory and Practice, Third Edition, New AgeInternational Limited, New Delhi, 2000

9. Ravindran A., D.T. Phillips and J.J. Solberg, Operations Research Principles andPractice, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2001.

10.Taha H.A., Operations Research An Introduction, Prentice-Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., NewDelhi, 2005.

11.Vedula S., and P.P. Mujumdar, Water Resources Systems: Modelling Techniques andAnalysis, Tata McGraw Hill, New Delhi, 2005.



29/267

Optimization Methods: Optimization using Calculus - Learning Objectives

Module 2: Optimization using Calculus

Learning Objectives

Optimization problems with continuous differentiable functions can be solved using the

classical methods of optimization. These analytical methods employ differential calculus to

locate the optimum points. The classical optimization techniques fail to have an application

where the functions are not continuous and not differentiable, and this happens with many

practical problems. However a study of these calculus based methods is a foundation for

development of most of the numerical techniques presented in later modules.

In this module a brief introduction to stationary points is followed by a presentation of the

necessary and sufficient conditions in locating the optimum solution of a single variable and

two variable functions. Convexity and concavity of these functions are explained. Then the

reader is introduced to the optimization of functions or single and multivariable functions

(with and without equality constraints). A few examples are discussed for each type. An

insight is also given to the Lagrangian function and Hessian matrix formulation. Finally we

take a look at the Kuhn-Tucker conditions with examples.

This module will help the reader to know about

1. Stationary points as maxima, minima and points of inflection2. Concavity and convexity of functions

3. Necessary and sufficient conditions for optimization for both single and multivariablefunctions

4. The Hessian matrix5. Optimization of multivariable function with and without equality constraints6. Kuhn-Tucker conditions

D Nagesh Kumar, IISc, Bangalore M2LO


30/267

Optimization Methods: Optimization using Calculus-Stationary Points 1

Module - 2 Lecture Notes 1

Stationary points: Functions of Single and Two Variables

Introduction

In this session, stationary points of a function are defined. The necessary and sufficient

conditions for the relative maximum of a function of single or two variables are also

discussed. The global optimum is also defined in comparison to the relative or local optimum.

Stationary points

For a continuous and differentiable functionf(x) a stationary pointx* is a point at which the

slope of the function vanishes, i.e. f (x) = 0 at x = x*, where x*belongs to its domain of

definition.

minimum inflection pointmaximum

Fig. 1

A stationary point may be a minimum, maximum or an inflection point (Fig. 1).

Relative and Global Optimum

A function is said to have a relative orlocal minimum at x = x* if * *( ) ( )f x f x h + for all

sufficiently small positive and negative values ofh, i.e. in the near vicinity of the point x*.

Similarly a point x* is called a relative orlocal maximum if * *( ) ( )f x f x h +

*( ) ( )

for all values

ofh sufficiently close to zero. A function is said to have a global orabsolute minimum atx =

x* if f x f x for allx in the domain over which f(x) is defined. Similarly, a function is



31/267


said to have a global orabsolute maximum atx = x* if *( ) ( )f x f x for allx in the domain

over whichf(x) is defined.

Figure 2 shows the global and local optimum points.

a b a bx x

f(x)f(x)

.

. .

..

.A1

B1

B2

A3

A2 Relative minimum is alsoglobal optimum (since only

one minimum point is there)

A1, A2, A3 = Relative maximaA2 = Global maximum

B1, B2 = Relative minimaB1 = Global minimum

Fig. 2

Functions of a single variable

Consider the functionf(x) defined fora x b . To find the value ofx* such thatx =

x

[ , ]a b

* maximizes f(x) we need to solve a single-variable optimization problem. We have the

following theorems to understand the necessary and sufficient conditions for the relative

maximum of a function of a single variable.

Necessary condition: For a single variable function f(x) defined forx which has a

relative maximum atx = x

[ , ]a b*,x* if the derivative[ , ]a b ) /'( ) (f X df x dx= existsas a finite

number atx = x* thenf(x*) = 0. This can be understood from the following.



32/267


Proof.

Sincef(x*) is stated to exist, we have

'

0

( * ) ( *)( *) lim

h

f x h f xf x

h

+ = (1)

From our earlier discussion on relative maxima we have ( *) ( * )f x f x h + for . Hence0h

( * ) ( *)0

f x h f x

h

+ h < 0 (2)

( * ) ( *)0

f x h f x

h

+ h > 0 (3)

which implies for substantially small negative values of h we have and for

substantially small positive values ofh we have

( *) 0f x

( *) 0f x . In order to satisfy both (2) and

(3), f( *)x

(

= 0. Hence this gives the necessary condition for a relative maxima at x = x* for

)x .f

It has to be kept in mind that the above theorem holds good for relative minimum as well.

The theorem only considers a domain where the function is continuous and differentiable. It

cannot indicate whether a maxima or minima exists at a point where the derivative fails to

exist. This scenario is shown in Fig 3, where the slopes m1 and m2 at the point of a maxima

are unequal, hence cannot be found as depicted by the theorem by failing for continuity. The

theorem also does not consider if the maxima or minima occurs at the end point of the

interval of definition, owing to the same reason that the function is not continuous, therefore

not differentiable at the boundaries. The theorem does not say whether the function will have

a maximum or minimum at every point wheref(x) = 0, since this conditionf(x) = 0 is for

stationary points which include inflection points which do not mean a maxima or a minima.

A point of inflection is shown already in Fig.1



33/267


f(x)

a bx

m2m1f(x*)

x*

Fig. 3

Sufficient condition: For the same function stated above letf(x*) =f(x*) = . . . =f(n-1)(x*)

= 0, butf

(n)

(x

*

) 0, then it can be said thatf(x *

) is (a) a minimum value off(x) iff

(n)

(x

*

) > 0and n is even; (b) a maximum value off (x) iff (n)(x*) < 0 and n is even; (c) neither a

maximum or a minimum ifn is odd.

Proof

Applying the Taylors theorem with remainder aftern terms, we have

2 1( 1)

( * ) ( *) '( *) ''( *) ... ( *) ( * )2! ( 1)! !

n nn nh h h

f x h f x hf x f x f x f x hn n

+ = + + + + + +

(4)

for 0


34/267


f (n)(x*) is negative, with f(x) concave aroundx*. When n is odd,!n

nhchanges sign with the

change in the sign ofh and hence the pointx* is neither a maximum nor a minimum. In this

case the pointx* is called apoint of inflection.

Example 1.

Find the optimum value of the function 2( ) 3 5f x x x= + and also state if the function

attains a maximum or a minimum.

Solution

'( ) 2 3 0f x x= + = for maxima or minima.

orx* = -3/2

''( *) 2f x = which is positive hence the pointx* = -3/2 is a point of minima and the function

attains a minimum value of -29/4 at this point.

Example 2.

Find the optimum value of the function and also state if the function attains a

maximum or a minimum.

4( ) ( 2)f x x=

Solution

3'( ) 4( 2) 0f x x= = for maxima or minima.

orx =x* = 2 for maxima or minima.

2''( *) 12( * 2) 0f x x= = at x* = 2

'''( *) 24( * 2) 0f x x= = atx* = 2



35/267


24* = xf atx* = 2

Hencefn(x) is positive and n is even hence the pointx = x*= 2 is a point of minimum and the

function attains a minimum value of 0 at this point.

Example 3.

Analyze the function and classify the stationary points as

maxima, minima and points of inflection.

5 4 3( ) 12 45 40 5f x x x x= + +

Solution

4 3 2

4 3 2

'( ) 60 180 120 0

3 2 0

or 0,1,2

f x x x x

x x x

x

= + =

=> + =

=

Consider the pointx =x*

= 0

'' * * 3 * 2 *( ) 240( ) 540( ) 240 0f x x x x= + =

atx* = 0

''' * * 2 *( ) 720( ) 1080 240 240f x x x= + = atx* = 0

Since the third derivative is non-zero,x =x* = 0 is neither a point of maximum or minimum

but it is a point of inflection.

Considerx = x*= 1

'' * * 3 * 2 *( ) 240( ) 540( ) 240 60f x x x x= + = atx* = 1

Since the second derivative is negative the pointx = x* = 1 is a point of local maxima with a

maximum value off(x) = 12 45 + 40 + 5 = 12



36/267


Considerx = x* = 2

'' * * 3 * 2 *( ) 240( ) 540( ) 240 240f x x x x= + = atx* = 2

Since the second derivative is positive, the pointx = x*

= 2 is a point of local minima with a

minimum value off(x) = -11

Example 4.

The horse power generated by a Pelton wheel is proportional to u(v-u) where u is the velocity

of the wheel, which is variable andv is the velocity of the jet which is fixed. Show that the

efficiency of the Pelton wheel will be maximum at u = v/2.

Solution

K. ( )

0 K 2K

or

2

0

f u v u

fv u

u

vu

=

= => =

=

where K is a proportionality constant (assumed positive).

2

2

2

2Kv

u

f

u=

=

which is negative.

Hence,fis maximum at2vu =

Functions of two variables

This concept may be easily extended to functions of multiple variables. Functions of two

variables are best illustrated by contour maps, analogous to geographical maps. A contour is a

line representing a constant value off(x) as shown in Fig.4. From this we can identify

maxima, minima andpoints of inflection.



37/267


Necessary conditions

As can be seen in Fig. 4 and 5, perturbations from points of local minima in any direction

result in an increase in the response function f(x), i.e. the slope of the function is zero at this

point of local minima. Similarly, at maxima andpoints of inflection as the slope is zero, the

first derivatives of the function with respect to the variables are zero.

Which gives us1 2

0; 0f f

x x

= =

at the stationary points, i.e., the gradient vector off(X), xf

at X = X* = [x1, x2] defined as follows, must equal zero:

1

2

( *)

0

( *)x

f

xf

f

x

= =

This is the necessary condition.

x2

x1

Fig. 4



38/267


Global maxima

Relative maxima

Relative minima

Global minima

Fig. 5

Sufficient conditions

Consider the following second order derivatives:

2 2 2

2 2

1 2 1

; ;2

f f f

x x x x

The Hessian matrix defined by H is made using the above second order derivatives.



39/267


1 2

2 2

2

1 1 2

2 2

2

1 2 2 [ , ]x x

f f

x x x

f f

x x x

=

H

a) IfH is positive definite then the point X = [x1, x2] is a point of local minima.b) IfH is negative definite then the point X = [x1, x2] is a point of local maxima.c) IfH is neither then the point X = [x1, x2] is neither a point of maxima nor minima.

A square matrix is positive definite if all its eigen values are positive and it is negative

definite if all its eigen values are negative. If some of the eigen values are positive and some

negative then the matrix is neither positive definite or negative definite.

To calculate the eigen values of a square matrix then the following equation is solved.

0 =A I

The above rules give the sufficient conditions for the optimization problem of two variables.

Optimization of multiple variable problems will be discussed in detail in lecture notes 3

(Module 2).

Example 5.

Locate the stationary points off(X) and classify them as relative maxima, relative minima or

neither based on the rules discussed in the lecture.

f(X) = + 5



40/267


Solution

From2

(X) 0f

x

=

, 1 22 2x x= +

From1

(X) 0f

x

=

2

2 28 14 3x x 0+ + =

2 2(2 3)(4 1) 0x x+ + =

2 23/ 2 or 1/ 4x x= =

so the two stationary points are

X1 = [-1,-3/2]

and

X2 = [3/2,-1/4]

The Hessian off(X) is

2 2 2 2

12 2

1 2 1 2 2 1

4 ; 4; 2f f f fxx x x x x x

= = = =



41/267


14 2

2 4

x =

H

1

4 2

2 4

x

=

I - H

At X1= [-1,-3/2],

4 2( 4)( 4) 4

2 4

+= = +

I - H 0 =

2 16 4 0 =

2 = 12

1 212 12 = + =

Since one eigen value is positive and one negative, X1 is neither a relative maximum nor a

relative minimum.

At X2 = [3/2,-1/4]

6 2( 6)( 4) 4

2 4

= =

I - H 0=

2 10 20 0 + =

1 25 5 5 5 = + =

Since both the eigen values are positive, X2 is a local minimum.

Minimum value of f(x) is -0.375.



42/267


Example 6

The ultimate strength attained by concrete is found to be based on a certain empirical

relationship between the ratios of cement and concrete used. Our objective is to maximize

strength attained by hardened concrete, given byf(X) = , wherex2 21 1 2 220 2 6 3 / 2x x x x+ + 1

andx2 are variables based on cement and concrete ratios.

Solution

Givenf(X) = ; where X =21 1 2 220 2 6 3 / 2x x x x+ + 2 [ ]1 2,x x

The gradient vector1 1

2

2

( *)2 2 0

6 3 0( *)

x

f

x xf

xf

x

= = =

, to determine stationary point X*.

Solving we get X* = [1,2]

2 2 2

2 2

1 2 1 2

2; 3; 0f f f

x x x x

= =

=

2 0

0 3

=

H

2 0( 2)( 3)

0 3

+

= = + ++I - H 0 =

Here the values of do not depend on X and 1 = -2, 2 = -3. Since both the eigen values

are negative, f(X) is concave and the required ratio x1:x2 = 1:2 with a global maximum

strength off(X) = 27 units.



43/267

Optimization Methods: Optimization using Calculus-Convexity and Concavity 1


Convexity and Concavity of Functions of One and Two Variables

Introduction

In the previous class we studied about stationary points and the definition of relative and

global optimum. The necessary and sufficient conditions required for a relative optimum in

functions of one variable and its extension to functions of two variables was also studied. In

this lecture, determination of the convexity and concavity of functions is discussed.

The analyst must determine whether the objective functions and constraint equations are

convex or concave. In real-world problems, if the objective function or the constraints are not

convex or concave, the problem is usually mathematically intractable.

Functions of one variable

Convex function

A real-valued function fdefined on an interval (or on any convex subset Cof some vector

space) is called convex, if for any two points a and b in its domain Cand any tin [0,1], we

have

)()1()())1(( bftatfbttaf ++

Fig. 1

In other words, a function is convex if and only if its epigraph (the set of points lying on or

above the graph) is a convex set. A function is also said to be strictly convex if



44/267


( (1 ) ) ( ) (1 ) ( )f ta t b tf a t f b+ < +

for any tin (0,1) and a line connecting any two points on the function lies completely above

the function. These relationships are illustrated in Fig. 1.

Testing for convexity of a single variable function

A function is convex if its slope is non decreasing or 2 2f / x 0. It is strictly convex if its

slope is continually increasing or > 0 throughout the function.

Properties of convex functions

A convex function f, defined on some convex open interval C, is continuous on C and

differentiable at all or at most, countable many points. If C is closed, then fmay fail to be

continuous at the end points ofC.

A continuous function on an interval Cis convex if and only if

( ) ( )

2 2

a b f a f bf

+ +

for all a and b in C.

A differentiable function of one variable is convex on an interval if and only if its derivative

is monotonically non-decreasing on that interval.

A continuously differentiable function of one variable is convex on an interval if and only if

the function lies above all of its tangents: ( ) ( ) '( )( )f b f a f a b a + for all a and b in the

interval.

A twice differentiable function of one variable is convex on an interval if and only if its

second derivative is non-negative in that interval; this gives a practical test for convexity. If

its second derivative is positive then it is strictly convex, but the converse does not hold, as

shown byf(x) =x4.

More generally, a continuous, twice differentiable function of several variables is convex on

a convex set if and only if its Hessian matrix is positive semi definite on the interior of the

convex set.



45/267


If two functionsfand g are convex, then so is any weighted combination af+ bg with non-

negative coefficients a and b. Likewise, iffand g are convex, then the function max{f,g} is

convex.

A strictly convex function will have only one minimum which is also the global minimum.

Examples

The second derivative ofx2 is 2; it follows thatx2 is a convex function ofx. The absolute value function |x| is convex, even though it does not have a derivative at

x = 0.

The functionfwith domain [0,1] defined byf(0)=f(1)=1,f(x)=0 for 0


46/267


[0,1], ( (1 ) ) ( ) (1 ) ( )t f ta t b tf a t f + + b

Additionally,f(x) is strictly concave if

[0,1], ( (1 ) ) ( ) (1 ) ( )t f ta t b tf a t f b + > +

These relationships are illustrated in Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Testing for concavity of a single variable function

A function is concave if its slope is non increasing or 2 2/f x 0. It is strictly concave if its

slope is continually decreasing or 2 2/f x < 0 throughout the function.

Properties of a concave functions

A continuous function on Cis concave if and only if

( ) ( )

2 2

a b f a f bf

+ +

for anyx andy in C.

Equivalently, f(x) is concave on [a, b] if and only if the function f(x) is convex on every

subinterval of [a, b].



47/267


Iff(x) is twice-differentiable, then f(x) is concave if and only iff (x) is non-positive. If its

second derivative is negative then it is strictly concave, but the opposite is not true, as shown

byf(x) = -x4.

A function is called quasiconcave if and only if there is an x0 such that for allx x0 it is non-increasing. x0 can also be , making the

function non-decreasing (non-increasing) for all

x. The opposite of quasiconcave is

quasiconvex.

Example 1

Consider the example in lecture notes 1 for a function of two variables. Locate the stationary

points of and find out if the function is convex, concave or

neither at the points of optima based on the testing rules discussed above.

5 4 3

( ) 12 45 40 5f x x x x= + +

Solution

4 3 2

4 3 2

'( ) 60 180 120 0

3 2 0

or 0,1,2

f x x x x

x x x

x

= + =

=> + =

=

Consider the pointx =x* = 0

3 2

''( *) 240( *) 540( *) 240 * 0f x x x x= + =

atx * = 0

2'''( *) 720( *) 1080 * 240 240f x x x= + = atx * = 0

Since the third derivative is non-zerox =x* = 0 is neither a point of maximum or minimum

but it is a point of inflection. Hence the function is neither convex nor concave at this point.

Considerx = x* = 1

3 2''( *) 240( *) 540( *) 240 * 60f x x x x= + = atx* = 1

Since the second derivative is negative, the pointx = x* = 1 is a point of local maxima with a

maximum value off(x) = 12 45 + 40 + 5 = 12. At this point the function is concave since

2 2/f x < 0.

Considerx = x* = 2

3 2''( *) 240( *) 540( *) 240 * 240f x x x x= + = atx* = 2

Since the second derivative is positive, the pointx = x* = 2 is a point of local minima with a

minimum value off(x) = -11. At this point the function is convex since 2 2/f x > 0.



48/267


Functions of two variables

A function of two variables,f(X) where X is a vector = [x1,x2], is strictly convex if

1 2 1( (1 ) ) ( ) (1 ) ( )f t t tf t f + < + 2

2

where X1 and X2 are points located by the coordinates given in their respective vectors.

Similarly a two variable function is strictly concave if

1 2 1( (1 ) ) ( ) (1 ) ( )f t t tf t f + > +

Contour plot of a convex function is illustrated in Fig. 3

340

Fig. 3

Contour plot of a convex function is shown in Fig. 4

Fig. 4

450

70x2

120

x1

x2

x1

110

210

305

40



49/267


To determine convexity or concavity of a function of multiple variables, the eigenvalues of

its Hessian matrix are examined and the following rules apply.

(a)If all eigenvalues of the Hessian are positive the function is strictly convex.(b)If all eigenvalues of the Hessian are negative the function is strictly concave.(c)If some eigenvalues are positive and some are negative, or if some are zero, the

function is neither strictly concave nor strictly convex.

Example 2

Consider the example in lecture notes 1 for a function of two variables. Locate the stationary

points off(X) and find out if the function is convex, concave or neither at the points of

optima based on the rules discussed in this lecture.

f(X) = 3 21 1 2 1 22 / 3 2 5 2 4 2x x x x x x + + + 5

Solution

21 1 2

1 2

2

( *)02 2 5

02 4 4( *)

x

f

x x xf

f x x

x

= = = + +

Solving the above the two stationary points are

X1 = [-1,-3/2]

and

X2 = [3/2,-1/4]

The Hessian off(X) is

2 2 2 2

12 2

1 2 1 2 2 1

4 ; 4; 2f f f f

xx x x x x x

= = = =

14 2

2 4

x =

H

14 2

2 4

x

=

I - H

At X1

4 2( 4)( 4) 4

2 4

+= = +

I - H 0 =

2 16 4 0 =



50/267


2 = 12

1 212 12 = + =

Since one eigen value is positive and one negative, X1 is neither a relative maximum nor a

relative minimum. Hence at X1 the function is neither convex nor concave.

At X2 = [3/2,-1/4]

6 2( 6)( 4) 4

2 4

= =

I - H 0=

2 10 20 0 + =

1 25 5 5 5 = + =

Since both the eigen values are positive, X2 is a local minimum, and the function is convex at

this point as both the eigen values are positive.



51/267

Optimization Methods: Optimization using Calculus - Unconstrained Optimization 1


Optimization of Functions of Multiple Variables: Unconstrained Optimization

Introduction

In the previous lectures we learnt how to determine the convexity and concavity of functions

of single and two variables. For functions of single and two variables we also learnt

determining stationary points and examining higher derivatives to check for convexity and

concavity, and tests were recommended to evaluate stationary points as local minima, local

maxima or points of inflection.

In this lecture functions of multiple variables, which are more difficult to be analyzed owing

to the difficulty in graphical representation and tedious calculations involved in mathematical

analysis, will be studied for unconstrained optimization. This is done with the aid of the

gradient vector and the Hessian matrix. Examples are discussed to show the implementation

of the technique.

Unconstrained optimization

If a convex function is to be minimized, the stationary point is the global minimum and

analysis is relatively straightforward as discussed earlier. A similar situation exists for

maximizing a concave variable function. The necessary and sufficient conditions for the

optimization of unconstrained function of several variables are given below.

Necessary condition

In case of multivariable functions a necessary condition for a stationary point of the function

f(X) is that each partial derivative is equal to zero. In other words, each element of the

gradient vector defined below must be equal to zero.

i.e. the gradient vector off(X),x

f at X=X*, defined as follows, must be equal to zero:

1

2

( *)

( *)

( *)

x

n

f

x

f

xf

f

dx

=

M

M

= 0



52/267


The proof given for the theorem on necessary condition for single variable optimization can

be easily extended to prove the present condition.

Sufficient condition

For a stationary point X* to be an extreme point, the matrix of second partial derivatives

(Hessian matrix) off(X) evaluated at X* must be:

(i) positive definite when X* is a point of relative minimum, and(ii) negative definite when X* is a relative maximum point.

Proof(Formulation of the Hessian matrix)

The Taylors theorem with reminder after two terms gives us

2

1 1 1*

1( * ) ( *) ( *)

2!

n n n

i i j

i i ji ih

df ff h f h h h

dx x xj

= = == +

+ = + +

0


53/267


Q will be positive for all h if and only ifH is positive definite at X=X*. i.e. the sufficient

condition forX* to be a relative minimum is that the Hessian matrix evaluated at the same

point is positive definite, which completes the proof for the minimization case. In a similar

manner, it can be proved that the Hessian matrix will be negative definite if X* is a point of

relative maximum.

A matrix A will be positive definite if all its eigenvalues are positive. i.e. all values of that

satisfy the equation

0 =A I

should be positive. Similarly, the matrix A will be negative definite if its eigenvalues are

negative.When some eigenvalues are positive and some are negative then matrix A is neither

positive definite or negative definite.When all eigenvalues are negative for all possible values ofX, then X* is a global maximum,

and when all eigenvalues are positive for all possible values of X, then X* is a global

minimum.

If some of the eigenvalues of the Hessian at X* are positive and some negative, or if some are

zero, the stationary point, X*, is neither a local maximum nor a local minimum.

Example

Analyze the function and classify the

stationary points as maxima, minima and points of inflection.

2 2 2

1 2 3 1 2 1 3 1 3( ) 2 2 4 5 2f x x x x x x x x x x= + + + +

Solution

11 2 3

2 1

2

3 1

3

( *)

2 2 2 4 0

( *) 2 2 0

2 2 5 0( *)

x

f

xx x x

ff x x

x

x xf

x

+ + + = = + =

+

Solving these simultaneous equations we get X*=[1/2, 1/2, -2]

2 2 2

2 2 2

1 2 3

2 2

1 2 2 1

2; 2; 2

2

f f f

x x x

f f

x x x x

= = =

= =



54/267


2 2

2 3 3 2

2 2

3 1 1 3

0

2

f f

x x x x

f f

x x x x

= =

= =

Hessian off(X) is

2

i j

f

x x

=

H

2 2 2

2 2 0

2 0 2

=

H

2 2 2

2 2 0

2 0 2

+

0= + =

+

I - H

or ( 2)( 2)( 2) 2( 2)(2) 2(2)( 2) 0 + + + + + + =

2( 2)[ 4 4 4 4] + + + + = 0

0

3( 2)+ =

or 1 2 3 2 = = =

Since all eigenvalues are negative the function attains a maximum at the point

X*=[1/2, 1/2, -2]



55/267

Optimization Methods: Optimization using Calculus - Equality constraints 1


Optimization of Functions of Multiple Variables subject to Equality Constraints

Introduction

In the previous lecture we learnt the optimization of functions of multiple variables studied

for unconstrained optimization. This is done with the aid of the gradient vector and the

He

optimization methods (lecture india)

Documents