optical fiber and cabling standardsv3 - bicsi · pdf fileoptical fiber and cabling standards...
TRANSCRIPT
Optical Fiber and Cabling Standards for Tomorrow’s Data Center
John KaminoProduct Manager – Multimode Fiber
[email protected]@ofsoptics.comOFS
Agenda
• Optical Market Drivers• Fiber and Cable Standards• Application Standardspp• Multimode Fiber Value Proposition• Future of Multimode Fiber• Future of Multimode Fiber• Conclusions
2
Agenda
• Optical Market Drivers• Fiber and Cable Standards• Application Standardspp• Multimode Fiber Value Proposition• Future of Multimode Fiber• Future of Multimode Fiber• Conclusions
3
IP Traffic Growth
Cisco Visual Networking Index:Forecast and Methodology, 2010-2105J 2 2011
Mobile: Includes mobile data and Internet traffic generated by handsets, notebook cards, and mobile b db d t
June 2, 2011
4
broadband gatewaysInternet: Denotes all IP traffic that crosses an Internet backboneManaged IP: Includes corporate IP WAN traffic, IP transport of TV/VoD
Internet Applications
YouTube December 2011 – 48 hours of video uploaded every minute 1
December 2011 – 3 billion videos viewed each day1
Apple Apple June 2011 – Apple iTunes hits 15 billion song sales 2
June 2011 – Apple iTunes hits 14 billion app downloads 2
OS 2 June 2011 – 200 million iOS users2
Facebook December 2011 – 800 million active users, 50% of users log , g
on in any given day4
1 http://www.youtube.com/t/press_statistics/2 WWDC 20113 http://www apple com/pr/library/2011/01/22appstore html
5
3 http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2011/01/22appstore.html4 http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics
What is happening today?
New York Times, February 16, 2011
6
High Performance Computing
TodayPERCS Supercomputer
2012Yesterday
Roadrunner Supercomputer2008
2012
“Need for Higher Density and Lower Power Interconnects for Future HPC and Servers” January 2011for Future HPC and Servers , January, 2011Petar Pepeljugoski, Marc Taubenblatt, and Jeff KashIBM
The Cloud is coming!
8
Cloud Penetration
• Gartner notes that cloud penetration is at very low levels, even in attractive applications
• Cloud application growth will drive higher bandwidth d d hdemand, not just in the data center, but also in the public network
“Google and Apple: Disrupting Microsoft and Others”December 14, 2011Tom Austin, VP & Gartner FellowDavid Mitchell Smith, VP & Gartner Fellow
Next Generation Speeds Coming!
http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4215814/IEEE-looks-beyond-100G-Ethernet
10
http://www.terabit-ethernet.com/terabit-or-400g-ethernet/
Worldwide Multimode Fiber Demand
IP t ffi d th IP traffic and server growth drive fiber demand
Virtualization increasing server usage and bandwidth demandsdemands
Servers requiring multiple Ethernet connectionsBandwidth
requirementsqRedundancy
10Gbps server links drive 40Gbps uplinksParallel 12 fiber links
lreplacing copper or 2 fiber duplex links.
11
Product Mix by Fiber Type
Agenda
• Optical Market Drivers• Fiber and Cable Standards• Application Standardspp• Multimode Fiber Value Proposition• Future of Multimode Fiber• Future of Multimode Fiber• Conclusions
13
OM4 Multimode Fiber Standardization
• Complete in both TIA and IEC– TIA-492AAADTIA 492AAAD– IEC 60793-2-10, Fiber Type A1a.3
• Specifications:– Effective Modal Bandwidth (EMB) >/= 4700 MHz-km
• Allows 2 methods for verification– DMD Masks or EMBc– OFL Bandwidth @850nm >/= 3500 MHz-km
• Ensures performance with sources that launch more power in outer modes.
– OFL Bandwidth @1300nm >/= 500 MHz-km • Ensures backward compatibility for FDDI, 100BASE-FX, 1000BASE-LX, etc.
14
Fiber Types and Standards
ISO/IEC 11801ANSI/TIA-568-C.3 IEC 60793-2-10
(fib )TIA/EIA(fib )
ITU-T(fib )
Industry Standards
ANSI/TIA 568 C.3(cable) (fiber) (fiber) (fiber)
62.5/125 OM1(1) A1b 492AAAA ---50/125 OM2(2) A1a.1 492AAAB G.651.150/125 OM3 A1a.2 492AAAC ---50/125 OM4 A1 3 492AAAD
Fiber Type
50/125 OM4 A1a.3 492AAAD ---Std SM OS1 B1.1 492CAAA G.652.A or B
Low Water Peak SM OS2(5) B1.3 492CAAB G.652.C or D
(5) OS2 is referenced in the standard ISO/IEC 24702 "Generic Cabling for Industrial Premises"
(1) OM1 is typically 62.5µm, but can also be 50µm(2) OM2 is typically 50µm, but can also be 62.5µm
ISO/IEC 11801ANSI/TIA-568-C.3 "Optical Fiber Cabling Components Standard"
IEC 60793-2-10
TIA/EIA-492AAAx "Detail Specification for… Class 1a Graded-Index Multimode Optical Fibers"
"Generic Cabling for Customer Premises"
"Product Specifications - Sectional Specification for Category A1 Multimode Fibres"
15
ITU-T G.651.1
ITU-T G.652 "Characteristics of a single-mode optical fibre and cable"
p p"Characteristics of a 50/125 um Multimode Graded Index Optical Fibre Cable for the Optical Access Network"
Optical Fiber Types and Cable Specifications
Wavelength Max LossFiber TypeMin Bandwidth
(MHz km)(nm) (dB/km) OFL BW EMB
OM1 850 3.5 200 n.a.62.5 µm 1300 1.5 500 n.a.OM2 850 3 5 500 n aOM2 850 3.5 500 n.a.50 µm 1300 1.5 500 n.a.OM3 850 3.5 1500 200050 µm 1300 1.5 500 n.a.50 µm 1300 1.5 500 n.a.OM4 850 3.5 3500 470050 µm 1300 1.5 500 n.a.OS1 1310 1.0 n.a. n.a.
Single-Mode ISP 1550 1.0 n.a. n.a.OS2* 1310 1.0 n.a. n.a.
Single-Mode ISP 1550 1.0 n.a. n.a.* OS2 is a "low water peak" single-mode fiber that has low attenuation in the 1385nm region
16OMx and OSx designations are from ISO/IEC 11801 and ANSI/TIA-568-C.3
OS2 is a low water peak single mode fiber that has low attenuation in the 1385nm region. It is suitable for CWDM applications.
What is going on with Bend Insensitive Multimode Fiber?Bend Insensitive Multimode Fiber?
• Standardization process has begun– TIA task force chaired by Dave Mazzarese, OFS
leading standardization effort – Work underway in IEC to characterize core
diameter and Numerical Aperture (NA) Thi k ill t BIMMF t d di ti i TIA• This work will support BIMMF standardization in TIA
– Work will be required to properly characterize bandwidth and system performance of BIMMFsbandwidth and system performance of BIMMFs
What is bend insensitive multimode fiber(The simple description)( p p )
Bend loss Bend loss Bend loss 100 turns
37.5 mm radius2 turns
15 mm radius2 turns
7.5 mm radius
7 5 mm
Standard 50/125 fiber
0.5 dB(850 & 1300nm)
1 dB(850 & 1300nm)
? dB
7.5 mm attenuation
performance not specified for
standard 50/125
Bend insensitive 0 5 dB
0.1 dB(850 nm)
0.2 dB(850 nm)
standard 50/125 fiber
insensitive multimode
fiber
0.5 dB(850 & 1300nm)
(850 nm)
0.3 dB(1300nm)
(850 nm)
0.5 dB(1300nm)
18
What has changed to make Bend Insensitive Multimode Fiber
Bend Insensitive Multimode Fiber
Standard Multimode Fiber
Guided Modes
Optical trench
Leaky Modes
The Challenge with adding an optical trench
• Positive (Guided modes more tightly bound)Macrobend performance improved ~5X– Macrobend performance improved 5X
• Negative (Leaky modes propagate in fiber)Negative (Leaky modes propagate in fiber)– Length dependence of NA and Core size– Uncertain connectivity performance– Uncertain bandwidth performance
Impact of Optical Trench in MMF
Optical trench has a strong impact on short length transmission – (less than 400 meters)
Optical trench has minimal or no impact on long length measurements– (Several kilometers)(Several kilometers)
Most links in a data centers are less than 100 meters and the i l h h ld b id doptical trench should be considered
– How does an optical trench impact connection loss?How does an optical trench impact connection loss?– How does an optical trench impact bandwidth?
Standardization of BIMMF
Work is underway at TIA and IEC to understand and characterize BIMMF, in order to provide a robust product that will support current and
future applications
TIA Standards Activity
• TIA 568 “Commercial Building Telecommunications Cabling• TIA-568 Commercial Building Telecommunications Cabling Standard” – Revision D – May begin in 2012
• TIA-942 “Telecommunications Infrastructure Standard for Data Centers”– Revision A – should publish in 2012– Revision A – should publish in 2012
TIA-942 Telecommunications Infrastructure Standard for Data CentersData Centers
• Originally published in 2005
• Revision TIA-942-A expected publication in 2012
– Major modifications from ANSI/TIA-942 in Optical• OM3 and OM4 are now the only recognized multimode media
types. OM4 is recommended. OM1 and OM2 fiber is no longer recognized.
• LC connector is the recognized single fiber (simplex and duplex fiber) connector.
• MPO is the recognized multi-fiber connectorg• Removed 100m length limitation on optical fiber horizontal
cabling. Now based on individual application requirements.
TIA – 942A Typical Data Center TopologyTypical Data Center Topology
• Main Distribution Area (MDA) i l d h M i Cincludes the Main Cross Connect (MC)– Central point of distribution
C l i l d H i l– Can also include a Horizontal Cross Connect when equipment areas are directly served
• Horizontal Distribution Area (HDA) may include a Horizontal Cross Connect (HC)( )
Agenda
• Optical Market Drivers• Fiber and Cable Standards• Application Standardspp• Multimode Fiber Value Proposition• Future of Multimode Fiber• Future of Multimode Fiber• Conclusions
26
Evolution of Short Reach Applications
40G & 100G Ethernet (IEEE 802.3ba)
Reach & Media: 40 Gb/s for servers HPC SAN NAS 40 Gb/s for servers, HPC, SAN, NAS
− 10km on SMF (1310nm) 40GBASE-LR4− 100m on OM3 MMF (850nm) 40GBASE-SR4
150m on OM4 MMF (850 nm) 40GBASE SR4− 150m on OM4 MMF (850 nm) 40GBASE-SR4− 7m over copper 40GBASE-CR4− 1m over backplane 40GBASE-KR4
100 Gb/s for switching, routing, aggregation− 40km on SMF (1310nm) 100GBASE-ER4− 10km on SMF (1310nm) 100GBASE-LR4( )− 100m on OM3 MMF (850nm) 100GBASE-SR10− 150m on OM4 MMF (850nm) 100GBASE-SR10− 7m over copper 100GBASE-CR10
28
pp
40G & 100G Ethernet (continued)
• Reduced reach of 100m on OM3, 150m on OM4 compared to 10G (300m on OM3, 550m on OM4) is due to relaxation of transmitter spectral width:
– from 0.45 to 0.65 nm
There have been no changes to the fiber itself!There have been no changes to the fiber itself!
1 0 O 4 d 9 % f C• 150m on OM4 expected to support 95%+ of Data Center links.
29
High Speed Short Reach Technologies:Multiple Fiber Parallel SystemsMultiple Fiber Parallel Systems
ffor 40G:
•One 12 fiber cable•One 12-fiber cable– duplex link– 8 active fibers
•12 Fiber MPO connector•One wavelength per fiber4 10 Gb/•4 x 10 Gb/s
30
High Speed Short Reach Technologies:Multiple Fiber Parallel SystemsMultiple Fiber Parallel Systems
for 100G:for 100G:
• Two 12 Fiber Cables, or 24 fib blfiber Cable– 20 Active– Duplex link
• MPO connector– 2 x 12 fiber
1 x 24 fiber– 1 x 24 fiber• One wavelength per fiber• 10 x 10 Gb/s
31
40G & 100G Ethernet – MDI RecommendationsReferences MPO interface req’s/specs of IEC 61754-7.
40GBASE-SR4
Left 4 fibers are TxRight 4 fibers are Rx
100GBASE-SR10(inner 4 fibers unused)
I 10 fib T R R I 10 fib L ft Sid T
Option BOption A Option C
Inner 10 fibers, Top Row are RxInner 10 fibers, Bot Row are Tx(outermost fibers both rows unused)
Inner 10 fibers, Left Side are TxInner 10 fibers, Right Side are Rx
(outermost fibers each side unused)
Inner 10 fibers, Top are RxInner 10 fibers, Bot are Tx
(outermost fiber Top & Bot unused)
32
p(recommended)
p
Data Center Environment
Migration to 10Gb/sCat6/6a copperCat6/6a copperActive CableOM3/4 fiber
Migration toMigration to 40 & 100Gb/sOM3/4 Fiber
Data from Alan Flatmannpresented to IEE 802.3 High Speed Study Group January 2008
Why is OM4 important?Fiber dominates in Access to Distribution and Distribution to Core links.
Alan Flatman – Principal Consultant, LAN Technologies, UK“Long Data Center Links vs. Length”IEEE802 3ba Jan 2008 Flatman 01 0108
34
IEEE802.3ba, Jan. 2008, Flatman_01_0108
Multimode Fiber Performance Grades
Reach & Bandwidth by MM Fiber Type
600 5000
h m)
Reach (at 10 Gb/s) Bandwidth (at 850nm)
300400500
each
at 1
0 G
b/s)
2000
30004000
andw
idth
km, a
t 850
nm
0100200
62 5 um 50 um 50 um 50 um
Re
(met
ers,
010002000 B
a(M
Hz-
k
OM162.5 um
OM250 um
OM3
LW300
50 umOM4
LW550
50 um
Fib T ( ISO G d )
35
Fiber Type ( ISO Grade )
Ethernet Link Distance/Application Mapping
B kbData Lg. Data Very Lg. D t
Link Speed
1 Gb/s
BackboneCentergCenter Data
Center
1 Gb/s
10 Gb/s OM4 OM3/OM4
40 Gb/s
100 Gb/sOM4 OS1/OS2
100 Gb/s
Link Distance 100m 150m 300m 550m 1000m >1000m
36
Ethernet – Next Generation
• Next Generation 100Gb/s Optical Ethernet Study Group– 4x25Gb/s transmission4x25Gb/s transmission– Different options discussed – not all will be chosen
Can Multimode Fiber Transmit 25Gb/s?
C. Patrick Caputo- Georgia Institute of TechnologyStephen E. Ralph – Georgia Institute of TechnologyYi Sun – OFS
38
Early 25Gb/s Transmission Test Results
O E DiOpen Eye Diagram 25Gb/s transmission over 200m OM4 LaserWave® 550 fiber!!!
39
Fibre Channel Link Distance
Link Speed Media Type
4G FC OM4
OM3/OM48G FC 800-M5-SA-I
8G FC OM4
OM3/OM4
800-M5-SN-I OM4
16G FC OM4
OS1/OS2
Link Distance 100m 125m 150m 190m 300m 380m 400m >400m
Fibre Channel –Next Generation
• 32G Fibre Channel Roadmap – Still serial transmission!
• 2 Fibersl d• Same external connectors – SFP and LC connectors
– Backward compatibility to 8 GFC and 16 GFCl d l– Planned FC-PI-6 release 2H2012
– Product shipment – 2014– Target link distance – 100m on OM4 fiber
Agenda
• Optical Market Drivers• Fiber and Cable Standards• Application Standardspp• Multimode Fiber Value Proposition• Future of Multimode Fiber• Future of Multimode Fiber• Conclusions
42
Comparison between Single-mode and Multimode Fiber SystemsMultimode Fiber Systems
Traditionally, optoelectronics have driven the cost difference between single-mode and multimodemode and multimode
• Single-mode CWDM systemPro: Lower cabling cost– Pro: Lower cabling cost
– Con: Significantly higher transceiver cost– Con: Higher power consumption
C L i– Con: Larger size
• OM3 and OM4 multimode parallel systemsP M h l t i t i i ti 10Gb/ VCSEL– Pro: Much lower transceiver cost using existing 10Gb/s VCSELs
– Pro: Lower power consumption– Pro: Smaller footprint
C Hi h bli t
43
– Con: Higher cabling cost
Single-mode vs. Multimode 100Gb/s Cost Comparisonp
Power Consumption
• Lower power consumption critical as link density and speed increasespeed increase– 100G CFP single-mode transceivers consume 20+ watts– 100G CXP multimode transceivers consume ~5 watts100G CXP multimode transceivers consume 5 watts
• Savings ~ 15 watts/transceiver• Cooling – another 15 watts/transceiver
• 4 transceivers/server (2 on each end), multiplied by hundreds or thousands4 transceivers/server (2 on each end), multiplied by hundreds or thousands of servers per data center can consume significant amounts of power!!
45
Single-mode vs. Multimode Module Size
• Significantly larger f t i t f i l dfootprint for single-mode CFP module
• Much lower faceplate densitydensity
• 4 single-mode modules in 1U footprint vs. 16-32 multimode modules!
46
What does all this tell us?
• Data centers will move towards more optical interconnects as bandwidth requirements increaseinterconnects as bandwidth requirements increase
• Multimode solutions have key advantages over both i l d d l isingle-mode and copper solutions
• Fiber bandwidth will be a key parameter
• Lower power consumption will be a key driver
Li k i ti l d t b i i i d• Link insertion loss needs to be minimized
47
Agenda
• Optical Market Drivers• Fiber and Cable Standards• Application Standardspp• Multimode Fiber Value Proposition• Future of Multimode Fiber• Future of Multimode Fiber• Conclusions
48
Why the higher speeds?y g p
Hi h d tiHigh speed connections simplify the network
More interconnects and switches required
Pictures presented by Adam Bechtel Yahoo! Chief Architect
and switches required
49
Pictures presented by Adam Bechtel – Yahoo! Chief Architect IEEE 802.3 Plenary March 2007
Agenda
• Optical Market Drivers• Fiber and Cable Standards• Application Standardspp• Multimode Fiber Value Proposition• Future of Multimode Fiber• Future of Multimode Fiber• Conclusions
50
Conclusions• Data centers are shifting from copper to fiber
C h li it d t i i di t– Copper has limited transmission distance– Fiber has much lower power consumption– Multimode fiber has key advantages over both copper and single-mode fiber
• OM3 and OM4 Multimode fiber is the media of choice for 40-100 Gb/s transmission rates in data centers– Only OM3 and OM4 are included in TIA-942-A, with OM4 recommended
• OM4 is well accepted and has been incorporated in system standards
• There will be a shift to parallel transmission over multimode fiber with MPO connections as network speeds exceed 10 Gb/s
51