optical distorsion
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
PRESENTATION BY
RIDAB
VISHAL
ALEX
![Page 2: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
INTRODUCTION
![Page 3: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Preliminary Analysis
![Page 4: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Determine the cost/savings benefit to
the farmer Vs. debeaking
![Page 5: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
debeaked ODI savings
mortality .216 .108 .108
feed 7.04 6.837 .203
labor .034 .033 .001
egg laying .099 --- .099
.411
cost of lens -.08
total savings per bird .331
![Page 6: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Calculation of mortality
debeaked = 9% (pg. 5,first paragraph)
i.e. 9% of $2.40 (exhibit 5)= $0.216
ODI = 4.5% (pg.. 5, 5th paragraph)
i.e. 4.5% of $2.40(exhibit 5) = $0.108
![Page 7: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
debeaked ODI savings
mortality .216 .108 .108
feed 7.04 6.837 .203
labor .034 .033 .001
egg laying .099 --- .099
.411
cost of lens -.08
total savings per bird .331
![Page 8: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Calculation for the feed
debeaked
it is $7.04 (exhibit 5)
ODI calculations
24.46 - 23.68 (on page 6, 2nd paragraph)
.78 / 100 = .0078 per chicken per day
.0078 * 365 = 2.847 lbs. for the whole year
benefit to the farmer $158 per ton, (pg.. 6, 2nd para.)
will be $0.158 per kg.
1 lbs.. = .453 kg.
Benefit will be 1.28969 kg. Per hen
1.28969 * .158 = .203
therefore 7.04 - .203 = $6.837
![Page 9: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
debeaked ODI savings
mortality .216 .108 .108
feed 7.04 6.837 .203
labor .034 .033 .001
egg laying .099 --- .099
.411
cost of lens -.08
total savings per bird .331
![Page 10: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Calculation for labor
debeaked (pg. 5, 2nd para)
3 * $2.5 = $7.50
$7.5 / 220 = $0.34
ODI (pg. 5, last para)
3 * $2.50 = $7.50
$7.50 / 225 = $.033
![Page 11: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
debeaked ODI savings
mortality .216 .108 .108
feed 7.04 6.837 .203
labor .034 .033 .001
egg laying .099 --- .099
.411
cost of lens -.08
total savings per bird .331
![Page 12: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Calculation for egg laying (trauma)
debeaking (pg. 5, 1st para)
loss one egg per 5 month
total loss is 2.4 eggs per year per hen
total cost per dozen = $0.50 ( exhibit 5)
total loss = 50 * 2.4 / 12 = $0.099 per hen
ODI
no loss (pg. 5, last line)
![Page 13: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
debeaked ODI savings
mortality .216 .108 .108
feed 7.04 6.837 .203
labor .034 .033 .001
egg laying .099 --- .099
.411
cost of lens (pg.7, first line) -.08
total savings per bird .331
![Page 14: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Determine the variable costs per pair
of lens
![Page 15: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
manufacturing (pg. 2, para 5) .032
injection 12000/15 million .0008
(pg.2 para 5)
box cost (pg 7, note) .00168
Plastic box .10
filling cost .14
order processing .18
total .42
divide by no. of lenses ie 250
______
total variable cost .03448
![Page 16: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Determine the fixed costs
![Page 17: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Fixed costs
a) payment to new world (pg.2, para 5) $25,000
b) office and warehouse (pg.7, table b) 196,000
c) head quarters expense (pg.7, para 2) 184,000
(assuming 20 million pair)
d) salesmen 280,000
e) technical representatives 70,000
f) advertising and promotional (pg. 7, 2nd para) 100,000
g) trade shows (pg. 7, 2nd para) 100,000
total fixed costs $ 955,000
![Page 18: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Assuming seven sales men, target California (flock size 20,000
and above) as per exhibit 3.
Flock size No. farms No. chickens
20000-49000 320 9,517,453
50000-99000 114 7,459,994
100000&above 87 22,952,283
521 39,929,730
per salesmen can cover 80 farms each year as assumed in
page 6 last paragraph
so 521/80 = 6.5 so taking 7 salesmen
so 7 * 40000 (pg.6 ,last paragraph) = 280,000
![Page 19: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Fixed costs
a) payment to new world (pg.2, para 5) $25,000
b) office and warehouse (pg.7, table b) 196,000
c) head quarters expense (pg.7, para 2) 184,000
(assuming 20 million pair)
d) salesmen 280,000
e) technical representatives 70,000
f) advertising and promotional (pg. 7, 2nd para) 100,000
g) trade shows (pg. 7, 2nd para) 100,000
total fixed costs $ 955,000
![Page 20: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Calculation for technical representatives
one technical representative is enough for five
salesmen (pg. 6, last para)
therefore two are required for seven salesmen
2 * 35000 (pg 6, last para) = 70000
![Page 21: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Fixed costs
a) payment to new world (pg.2, para 5) $25,000
b) office and warehouse (pg.7, table b) 196,000
c) head quarters expense (pg.7, para 2) 184,000
(assuming 20 million pair)
d) salesmen 280,000
e) technical representatives 70,000
f) advertising and promotional (pg. 7, 2nd para) 100,000
g) trade shows (pg. 7, 2nd para) 100,000
total fixed costs $ 955,000
![Page 22: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Determine the appropriate price range
![Page 23: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Range of pricing is between $.08 and $.24
if we use
price for pair of lenses $.24 $.08
variable costs .03448 .03448
(as calculated)
fixed costs .04775 .04775
profits for ODI (per pair) $.1577 $(-.00223)
![Page 24: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Calculation of fixed costs
$955,000 / 20,000,000 = $0.04775
![Page 25: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Range of pricing is between $.08 and $.24
if we use
price for pair of lenses $.24 $.08
variable costs .03448 .03448
(as calculated)
fixed costs .04775 .04775
profits for ODI (per pair) $.1577 $(-.00223)
![Page 26: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Strategic analysis
![Page 27: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
price selection should be
![Page 28: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
The breakeven at $.24 is going to be 4,646,750
pairs of lenses.
Which seems achievable because we are targeting
40,000,000.(calculated earlier)
![Page 29: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Calculation of breakeven quantity
fixed costs = (price per pair - v.c. per pair) * break
even quantity
955,000 = (.24 - .03448) * Q
955,000 = .20552Q
Q = 955,000 / .20552
Q = 4646750
![Page 30: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
No!
![Page 31: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
![Page 32: Optical distorsion](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022052523/5563c244d8b42aa0588b45da/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Thank you