operational air quality plan · center operational air quality plan (ce-1 northeast gateway) (ce-2...
TRANSCRIPT
Prologis Oakland GlobalLogisticsCenter
Operational AirQuality Plan
(CE-1 Northeast Gateway)(CE-2 Southeast Gateway)(CC-1 New Central Gateway)
Building 1, 2, 3
Prepared By:
Prologis3353 Gateway Blvd.Fremont, CA 94538+1 510 656 1900 Phone+1 510 656 4320 Fax
www.prologis.com
v.0 - Mar. 24, 2017v.1 - Mar. 28, 2017v.2 - Feb. 5, 2018v.3 - Mar. 7, 2018v.4 - Mar. 26, 2018
Prepared For:
City of OaklandPlanning & Building Dept.250 Frank Ogawa PlazaOakland, CA 94612
Submitted on:
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Purpose of the Operational Air Quality Plan ....................................................................................... 1
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................................. 2
3. SCA/MMRP REQUIREMENTS ..................................................................................................................... 3
4. OPERATIONAL AIR QUALITY PLAN ELEMENTS .......................................................................................... 4
4.1 Truck and Equipment Diesel Emission Reduction Program ................................................................ 5
4.2 Sustainable Design and Construction ................................................................................................. 6
4.3 Transportation Control Measures & Parking/Transportation Demand Management ....................... 7
4.4 Participation in Emissions Reduction Demonstration Projects........................................................... 8
4.5. Technology Review Program ............................................................................................................. 8
5. PLAN IMPLEMENTATION ........................................................................................................................... 9
6. CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................................... 10
Appendix A - Air Quality Related SCA/MMRP’s ............................................................................................ A
Appendix B - LEED Lease Addendum ............................................................................................................ B
Appendix C – PG&E NEM 2.0 Guidelines ...................................................................................................... C
1
1. INTRODUCTION
Prologis is the leading global owner, operator, and developer of logistics real estate. We serve
manufacturers, retailers, e-commerce businesses, transportation companies, and logistics providers
with the facilities that support local, regional and global trade. Our buildings are located close to
transportation infrastructure such as railways, seaports, highways, and airports. We provide our
customers with best-in-class facilities and have a long history of industry-leading corporate governance
and transparency.
As the ground lessee of 58 acres of the City’s former Oakland Army Base site (OAB) property for the next
66 years, we intend to be good stewards of the land, and recognize the concerns of the West Oakland
community we and our tenants will operate in. Prologis is also committed to the success of our business
and the success of our customer’s businesses who occupy our buildings. Working towards the goals for
improved air quality will require coordination and collaboration from all stakeholders, to plan and
implement initiatives that are impactful, practical, and feasible.
1.1 Purpose of the Operational Air Quality Plan
The purpose of the Operational Air Quality (AQ) Plan is multifaceted:
• To provide clarity and determine applicability of Project Standard Conditions of Approval and
Mitigation Measures (SCA/MMs) related to air quality.
• To provide clear direction for our Project tenant(s); and establish operation requirements that
tenants must use for Tenant Improvements (TI) and on-going operations.
• To provide a documented path of compliance for the SCA/MMs relating to air quality and MM
PO-1, which involves public outreach to various stakeholders.
The Oakland Army Base Redevelopment (OARB) project was approved in 2002, and then refined with an
IS/Addendum in 2012. In both of these documents, the goals and mitigations were very broad,
attempting to cast a wide net over a master plan level development that was still in the conceptual
stage. One of the objectives of the Operational Air Quality Plan (Plan) is to clarify and distill which
requirements apply to this particular Project, to clarify any vagueness in the applicable SCA/MMs and
comply with the mitigation measures. The City of Oakland, as the lead agency under the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), will be the governing body determining compliance with the
Mitigation Measures.
• This document applies to all tenants occupying any portion of the three Prologis warehouse
buildings at the former Oakland Army Base. Such buildings are located at the Northeast Gateway,
the East Gateway and the New Central Gateway sites.
2
• This document provides programmatic-level requirements, design, and operating parameters for
tenants regarding air quality impacts and energy conservation.
• Tenants are required to comply with all applicable state and regional air quality regulations and are
required to implement the components of this document.
• Tenants will be required to demonstrate how compliance is achieved on the specific user level.
• This Plan will become a component of Tenant Lease documents.
Compliance with the Operational AQ Plan will be deemed compliant with the Project SCA/MMRPs. The
City of Oakland, as lead agency, will be the approving body determining compliance.
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Prologis’ Oakland Global Logistics Center consists of three sites within the City’s portion of the Oakland
Army Base Redevelopment project. The subject Project of this Operational Air Quality Plan consists of
three (3) buildings located on each of these three sites.
• Building 1 is a 256,136 square foot cross dock facility situated on the Northeast Gateway, a 16.12
acre parcel bounded to the North by W. Grand Ave. and the I-80/880 flyover, to the West by
Maritime St., and to the South/East by New Burma Road (to be renamed Admiral Robert Toney
Way). The shell of the building was completed in October, 2017, and construction of the interior
elements of the building have not yet begun. At this time, (first quarter 2018) no tenant(s) have
been identified for this warehouse. The address of this building is 55 Admiral Robert E Toney Way.
• Building 2 is a planned 232,785 square foot front load building with rail along the entire back portion
of the building situated on the Southeast Gateway, a 14.1 acre parcel bounded to the North by
Admiral Robert E Toney Way and to the West by Maritime St. Plans have been submitted and are
currently under review by the City of Oakland for all necessary permits to construct with an
anticipated construction start of Summer 2018. The address for this building is anticipated to be
2000 Maritime St.
• Building 3 is a planned 188,000 s.f. front load building on a portion of the Central Gateway Site not
developed with the ConGlobal use. This site is an 11.5 acre site bounded by Maritime to the East
and Burma Road to the North. The address is anticipated to be 2001 Maritime St.
See Fig. 1 for Site Plan.
3
Figure 1: Site Plan – Overall Site
3. SCA/MMRP REQUIREMENTS
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review process for the OARB project at master plan
level resulted in the Standard Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
(SCA/MMRP), which was based on the Initial Study/Addendum (IS/A) prepared for the 2012 OARB
Project. The revised and final version of the SCA/MMRP was approved by the City Council on July 16,
2013 and supersedes the previous version (dated October 15, 2012).
This Operational AQ Plan will focus on the air quality impacts and those certain conditions of approval
and mitigation measures identified to be part of the stakeholder engagement process detailed in
CC-1 CE-2
CE-1
4
mitigation measure public outreach one (MM PO-1). See Appendix A for full text from the applicable
pages in the 2013 SCA/MMRP.
Table 1 below lists the air quality related SCA/MMs from MM PO-1. Under direction from the City,
Prologis bifurcated these SCA/MMs into construction vs. operational requirements. Prior to receiving
the building shell and sitework permits for the Project, Prologis prepared (and the City approved) the
Construction Management Plan, which addresses the construction related air quality SCA/MMs. This
document focuses on the items below with the response method labeled with “Ops Plan.” In addition,
this Operational AQ Plan covers SCA AIR-3 and GCC-1, which are not subject to public outreach but are
part of the air quality related SCA/MMRPs.
Table 1: Summary of Response to MM PO-1 Stakeholder Items
SCA/MM # Description Response Method
AIR-1 Construction Management Plan Construction Mgmt Plan
AIR-2 Construction Related Air Pollution Controls Construction Mgmt Plan
TRANS-2 Construction Traffic & Parking Construction Mgmt Plan
MM 4.3-13 Traffic Control Plan – Hazmat Construction Mgmt Plan
MM 4.4-6 Energy Conserving Fixtures/Design Ops Plan
MM 4.3-7 Truck Management Plan Fair Share Plan
MM 4.4-4 Truck Diesel Emissions Reduction Plan Ops Plan/Fair Share Plan
MM 4.4-5 Transportation Control Measures Ops Plan/Fair Share Plan
TRANS-1 Parking and Transportation Demand Mgmt CMP/Ops Plan/Fair Share Plan
MM 5.4-1 Demonstration Projects Ops Plan
MM 4.4-3b Maritime/Rail Related Emissions NOT APPLICABLE*
*MM4.4-3b applies only to West Gateway and Railroad ROW; Prologis is not a party to these areas.
4. OPERATIONAL AIR QUALITY PLAN ELEMENTS
There are five components of the Operational Air Quality Plan with an indication of which SCA/MM each
element addresses:
4.1) Truck and Equipment Diesel Emission Reduction Program (MM 4.4-4)
4.2) Sustainable Design and Construction (SCA TRANS-1, MM 4.4-6, SCA AIR-3)
5
4.3) Transportation Control Measures and Parking/Transportation Demand Management (SCA TRANS-
1, , MM 4.4-5)
4.4) Encourage, Lobby, and Participate in Emission Reduction Demonstration Projects (MM 5.4-1)
4.5) Technology Review Program
4.1 Truck and Equipment Diesel Emission Reduction Program
The requirements listed below will reduce the diesel emissions including diesel particulate matter and
nitrogen oxides produced during the operation of these warehouses.
4.1.1) Drayage Trucks1 – If a truck entering the site of each warehouse is transporting cargo to or from
the maritime terminals, an intermodal rail yard, or property of the Port of Oakland, the trucks doing so
must comply with the Drayage Truck Regulation (DTR) of the California Air Resources Board (CARB)
which is in effect at the time of operation of the truck(s). See California Air Resource Board’s Drayage
Truck Regulation for more details, including truck engine year requirements and truck registry
requirements.
4.1.2) On-Road Trucks – All diesel trucks with a gross vehicle weight rating over 14,000 pounds entering
the site of each warehouse which are not transporting cargo directly to or from the Port of Oakland or
an intermodal rail yard must comply with the Truck and Bus Regulation of CARB which is in effect at the
time of operation of the truck(s).
4.1.3) Trucks with transport refrigeration units (TRUs) – If a truck has a trailer or van mounted TRU that
is capable of plugging into dock power, then the tenant(s) shall require the operator of the truck to plug
into the available dock power when loading, unloading and parked at the truck dock.
4.1.4) Cargo Handling Equipment (CHE) -
a. All CHE (eg. Yard hostlers/exterior forklifts) must be low emissions equipment. In 2018, this includes
Tier 4i or Tier 4 diesel equipment, electric, propane and alternative fueled equipment.
b. All CHE must comply with CARB Off-Road Diesel Vehicle Regulations.
c. Any new CHE with 25 horsepower or greater purchased or leased by Tenant(s) following their initial
occupancy shall meet or exceed standard in place at that time of this plan approval, or shall be electric
or alternative fueled equipment.
d. Tenant shall consider alternative fuel or electric CHE as part of a pilot program, or once such
equipment is commercially available, economically feasible and practical for application for Tenant’s
intended use.
e. All off-road equipment shall be properly serviced such that the Tier 4 or Tier 4i emission standards
are maintained throughout the life of the equipment.
1 Drayage trucks are defined by CARB as diesel-fueled Class 7 or Class 8 Trucks with gross vehicle weight rating
26,001 lbs. or more that transport cargo, containers, or chassis to or from a port or intermodal rail yard in CA.
6
4.1.5) Material Handling Equipment -
a. All MHE (eg. Interior forklifts/reach trucks) shall be electric, propane or alternative fuels. Electric
equipment shall have the capability to charge from building power.
b. If MHE powered by alternative fuels such as biodiesel, CNG or LNG become commercially available,
economically feasible and practical for Tenant’s intended use, it may also be used.
4.1.6) Idling Rules - All trucks and diesel CHE shall be prohibited from idling more than 2 minutes when
loading and unloading, staging, or when not in active use for extended periods of time. Exemptions from
the two-minute would be allowed when required for safety and when equipment is in use.
4.1.7) Management of Loading Docks - If truck idling times become longer than two minutes then an
appointment system or dock management system shall be implemented so that queuing and truck idling
times are reduced to two minutes.
4.1.8) CARB Compliance –
a. Comply with applicable air quality regulations for heavy duty-diesel trucks including, but not limited
to, the Air Resources Board’s (ARB) Tractor-Trailer Greenhouse Gas Reduction Regulation, Periodic
Smoke Inspection Program, Drayage Regulation or Statewide Truck and Bus Regulation.
b. All truck fleets owned by tenants in this building shall provide proof of compliance through CARB
certificates of compliance and copies of annual smoke test results.
c. If tenant(s) are transporting refrigerated cargo, then the CARB Transport Refrigeration Regulation
applies2.
d. Compliance with all applicable CARB regulations for off-road diesel equipment used on this site is
required.
4.2 Sustainable Design and Construction
Sustainable design of tenant improvements has a beneficial impact on long-term emissions reduction,
improved air quality and reduced energy consumption. Tenants are required to comply with all
applicable state and regional air quality regulations and are required to implement the following:
4.2.1) LEED Gold – The core and shell of the building is achieving a “Gold” level certification per the
United States Green Building Council’s (USGBC’s) Leadership in Environmental and Environmental
Design (LEED) rating system as required by Oakland’s Green Building Ordinance. As part of the Gold
level Core and Shell certification, it is expected that the tenant improvements (TI) will be performed
under a separate scope and includes a provision to include certain sustainable design measures in the TI
not a part of the shell build-out. Tenant must follow the design guidelines set forth under LEED Gold
Core and Shell system. This LEED addenda shall be included as an exhibit to the lease. Draft version is
attached as Appendix B, and includes requirements such as:
• Bike storage, changing rooms and showers
2 TRU Regulation Order available at: https://www.arb.ca.gov/diesel/tru/documents/fro_10-16-12.pdf
7
• Low flow plumbing fixtures
• Energy efficient lighting (LED)
• Additional ventilation
• Recycling mandate
Tenant is also encouraged, but not required, to obtain LEED-CI (Commercial Interiors) certification,
preferably also at a Gold level.
4.2.2) Title 24 Compliance – New tenant construction shall meet Title 24 (Building Energy Efficiency
Program) of the International Building Code (IBC)/California Code of Regulations (CCR) to satisfy
Mitigation Measure 4-4.6. This will be required in order to obtain a building or TI permit from the City of
Oakland.
4.2.3) Renewable Energy –
a. Tenants are highly encouraged to provide a renewable energy system or combination of systems
(solar/wind/mechanical/tidal/hydrogen) designed to offset 20% of building’s annual electrical
consumption.
b. Rooftop solar photovoltaic (PV) power is preferred.
c. The shell building roof structure has been designed to support an additional 3 pounds per square foot
(PSF) of solar panel load.
d. The electrical rooms have been sized for additional future solar PV infrastructure.
e. Conduit for additional electrical capacity has been installed on the site, coming into the parking lot
for future charging of electrical cargo handling equipment and electric trucks.
f. PG&E’s Net Energy Metering 2.0 released in December 2016 allows commercial PV systems greater
than 1MW. A guidance document for PG&E net metering is attached as Appendix C.
4.2.4) Electrical Power and Outlets at Loading Docks – It is not yet known who the tenant(s) of these
buildings will be, nor is it known if users of these buildings will have refrigerated product. If any portion
of the tenant’s space is used for refrigerated product, the loading docks serving the refrigerated areas of
the building shall be equipped with industrial refrigerator container (reefer) outlets for the purpose of
providing truck operators the ability to shut off main engines while maintaining power to the Transport
Refrigeration Unit (TRU) and other internal systems. This requirement applies to facilities that will
receive or send refrigerated containers.
4.3 Transportation Control Measures & Parking/Transportation Demand Management
BAAQMD has identified Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) in MM4.4-5 that could be initiated and
implemented by the City and the Port for the OARB project as part of a fair share program with the Port
and other developers.
Transportation Control Measures
8
Separate from a fair share program, each tenant is required to implement BAAQMD TCMs 9, 11, and 13
per MM 4.4-5:
9 – Preferential parking for carpool and vanpool vehicles are provided per LEED standards.
11 – Secure, weather protected bicycle parking is provided via bike lockers.
13 – Showers and lockers will be part of the TI per the LEED Addendum detailed in Appendix B.
- Electrical vehicle charging stations for cars as well as conduit in place for potential of future truck
charging stations.
4.3.1) Fair Share Participation – In addition, tenant may be required to contribute to fair share funded
TCM programs, as described in MM 4.4-5. City shall take lead on establishing Fair Share Plan, and
implementing a fair and equitable allocation amongst projects.
4.3.2) Parking and Transportation Demand Management – Tenant shall prepare and implement a
Parking and Transportation Demand Management Plan per SCA TRANS-1, consistent with the number of
onsite employees, with the goal of reducing drive-alone commute trips during the peak traffic periods.
4.4 Participation in Emissions Reduction Demonstration Projects
In order to prioritize the potential for further emissions reductions resulting from operations, tenant
shall demonstrate active involvement in evaluating newer technologies and participation in
demonstration projects.
4.4.1) Demonstration Projects – Tenant shall consider, evaluate, and potentially participate in emission
reduction demonstration projects that promote technological advances in improving air quality.
Examples of some demonstration projects include: hybrid electric yard hostlers, biodiesel powered yard
equipment, CNG/LNG technology implementation, energy generation via mechanical systems using
truck weight to generate electricity.
Tenant is encouraged to suggest innovative and cleaner technology from operations in other locations
where tenant may work in.
4.5. Technology Review Program
All tenants shall use cleaner technology over time as it becomes available, practical and economically
feasible. To accomplish this, each tenant shall review new technology every three years and with
equipment turnover (prior to acquisition of, or lease of, additional or replacement off-road equipment
to see if zero or near-zero equipment is economically feasible and practical. Tenant shall investigate and
make part of such analysis, any grant, voucher or other type of program that would help offset cost and
/ or otherwise make such equipment available, practical and economically feasible.
9
If the technology review demonstrates that new technology/equipment will be effective in substantially
reducing the emissions, is available, practical and economically feasible, then the tenant shall implement
such technology within 12 months.
5. PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
Each tenant in the Project shall submit, as part of the Tenant Improvement Plans, documentation and a
summary of how tenant intends to comply with each element of the Operational AQ Plan. City staff will
be responsible for reviewing and approving the method of compliance noted by the Tenant. The
Compliance Summary can be included on the plans or as a separate document. An example of a
Compliance Summary Table is below:
Table 2 – Operational AQ Plan Compliance Summary Table Example
ID Description of Plan Element Compliance Method/Description Expected Date
of Implement
4.1 T/E Diesel Emission Reduction
4.1.1 – Drayage Trucks [provide truck fleet info]
4.1.2 – On Road Trucks [provide truck fleet info]
4.1.3 – Trucks with TRUs [provide signage or policy]
4.1.4 – Cargo Handling Equipment [provide CHE fleet info; participate
in CARB DOORS program]
4.1.5 – Material Handling
Equipment
[provide MHE info]
4.1.6 – Idling Rules [reference plan sheets showing
idling policy signage or provide
other means of communicating
idling policy]
4.1.7 – Dock Management [provide a plan to monitor truck
deliveries and potential queuing]
4.1.8 – CARB Compliance [provide fleet info]
4.2 Sustainable TI Design
4.2.1 – LEED Gold Compliance [reference plan sheets or
submittals where LEED Addenda
items are shown]
4.2.2 – Title 24 Compliance [provide statement on sheet
indicating T24 compliance]
4.2.3 – Renewable Energy [if proposed, describe solar PV or
other onsite renewable energy
system – how many kW, expected
generation]
4.3 Transportation Control Measures
10
4.3.1 – Fund Fair Share Programs [City to assess fair share once
program is implemented]
4.3.2 – Parking/TDM Program [provide a plan to reduce
employee single-driver traffic]
4.4 Demonstration Projects
4.4.1 – Demo Projects Participation [provide any demonstration
projects]
4.5 Technology Review
4.5.1 – Technology Review
Program
[provide periodic updates over
time]
Timing to implement most of these plan elements will happen as the tenant improvements are
constructed or as operations begin. However, Prologis nor the tenant controls the implementation
timing of the fair share program elements. The fair share elements are City led programs.
From time to time, tenant may be required to provide reporting on the progress or maintenance of
various plan elements (for example, updating truck fleet as new vehicles are purchased). Any update
requests shall be initiated by the City and tenant shall endeavor to provide the requested information.
6. CONCLUSION
This Operational Air Quality Plan accomplishes goals consistent with the BAAQMD guidance of:
• Meeting the spirit and letter of the mitigation program
• Providing measurable, quantifiable, results
• Protecting health of nearby workers and residents
Prologis and its tenants look forward to working with the City and other stakeholders to meet the
Project compliance and mitigation goals.
A
Appendix A - Air Quality Related SCA/MMRP’s
2012
OA
RB
PR
OJE
CT
SC
A/M
MR
P (
RE
VIS
ED
BY
CIT
Y C
OU
NC
IL 7
-16-1
3)
PA
GE
3
En
vir
on
men
tal
Imp
act
S
tan
dard
Co
nd
itio
ns
of
Ap
pro
val/
Mit
igati
on
Mea
sures
Mit
igati
on
Im
ple
men
tati
on
/
Mon
itori
ng
:
Sch
ed
ule
R
esp
on
sib
ilit
y
sub
stan
tial
ly l
ess
use
ful
or
enjo
yab
le t
o t
he
pub
lic.
Th
e C
ity m
ay r
equ
ire
spec
ific
bu
ild
ing
pla
cem
ent,
tie
red
roo
fs,
or
oth
er m
ean
s o
f re
du
cin
g s
had
ow
eff
ects
on
pub
lic
op
ens
spac
es.
It i
s no
t
the
inte
nt
of
this
mea
sure
to
co
mp
lete
ly e
lim
inat
e sh
ade
in t
hes
e ar
eas,
bu
t to
red
uce
sh
ade
to t
he
max
imu
m e
xte
nt
feas
ible
.
Air
Qu
ali
ty
1.
Wo
uld
th
e p
roje
ct c
on
flic
t w
ith
or
ob
stru
ct i
mp
lem
enta
tio
n o
f th
e
app
lica
ble
air
qu
alit
y p
lan
?
SC
A A
IR-2
: C
on
stru
ctio
n-R
elate
d A
ir P
oll
uti
on
Con
trols
(D
ust
an
d E
qu
ipm
en
t E
mis
sio
ns)
:
Du
rin
g c
on
stru
ctio
n,
the
pro
ject
ap
pli
can
t sh
all
req
uir
e th
e co
nst
ruct
ion
co
ntr
acto
r to
im
ple
men
t al
l
of
the
foll
ow
ing ap
pli
cab
le m
easu
res
reco
mm
end
ed b
y th
e B
ay A
rea
Air
Q
ual
ity M
anag
emen
t
Dis
tric
t (B
AA
QM
D):
a)
Wat
er a
ll e
xp
ose
d s
urf
aces
of
acti
ve
con
stru
ctio
n a
reas
at
leas
t tw
ice
dai
ly (
usi
ng r
ecla
imed
wat
er i
f p
oss
ible
). W
ater
ing s
hould
be
suff
icie
nt
to p
reven
t ai
rbo
rne
du
st f
rom
lea
vin
g t
he
site
.
Incr
ease
d w
ater
ing
fre
qu
ency
may
be
nec
essa
ry w
hen
ever
win
d s
pee
ds
exce
ed 1
5 m
iles
per
ho
ur.
Rec
laim
ed w
ater
sh
ou
ld b
e u
sed
wh
enev
er p
oss
ible
.
b)
Co
ver
all
tru
cks
hau
lin
g s
oil
, sa
nd
, an
d o
ther
loo
se m
ater
ials
or
req
uir
e al
l tr
uck
s to
mai
nta
in a
t
leas
t tw
o f
eet
of
free
bo
ard
(i.
e.,
the
min
imu
m r
equ
ired
sp
ace
bet
wee
n t
he
top
of
the
load
an
d
the
top
of
the
trai
ler)
.
c)
All
vis
ible
mu
d o
r d
irt
trac
k-o
ut
on
to a
dja
cen
t pu
bli
c ro
ads
shal
l b
e re
mo
ved
usi
ng w
et p
ow
er
vac
uu
m s
tree
t sw
eep
ers
at l
east
on
ce p
er d
ay.
Th
e u
se o
f d
ry p
ow
er s
wee
pin
g i
s p
roh
ibit
ed.
d)
Pav
e al
l ro
adw
ays,
dri
vew
ays,
sid
ewal
ks,
etc
. as
so
on
as
feas
ible
. In
ad
dit
ion
, bu
ild
ing p
ads
sho
uld
be
laid
as
soon
as
po
ssib
le a
fter
gra
din
g u
nle
ss s
eed
ing o
r so
il b
ind
ers
are
use
d.
e)
En
clo
se,
cover
, w
ater
tw
ice
dai
ly o
r ap
ply
(n
on
-to
xic
) so
il s
tab
iliz
ers
to e
xp
ose
d s
tock
pil
es
(dir
t, s
and
, et
c.).
f)
Lim
it v
ehic
le s
pee
ds
on
un
pav
ed r
oad
s to
15
mil
es p
er h
ou
r.
g)
Idli
ng t
imes
on
all
die
sel-
fuel
ed c
om
mer
cial
veh
icle
s o
ver
10
,00
0 l
bs.
sh
all
be
min
imiz
ed e
ith
er
by s
hu
ttin
g e
qu
ipm
ent
off
wh
en n
ot
is u
se o
r re
du
cin
g t
he
max
imu
m i
dli
ng t
ime
to f
ive
min
ute
s
(as
req
uir
ed b
y T
itle
13
, S
ecti
on
24
85
, o
f th
e C
alif
orn
ia C
od
e o
f R
egu
lati
on
s.
Cle
ar s
ign
age
to
this
eff
ect
shal
l b
e p
rovid
ed f
or
con
stru
ctio
n w
ork
ers
at a
ll a
cces
s p
oin
ts.
h)
Idli
ng
tim
es
on
al
l d
iese
l-fu
eled
o
ff-r
oad
v
ehic
les
over
2
5
hors
epo
wer
sh
all
be
shal
l b
e
min
imiz
ed e
ith
er b
y s
hu
ttin
g e
quip
men
t o
ff w
hen
no
t is
use
or
red
uci
ng t
he
max
imu
m i
dli
ng
tim
e to
fiv
e m
inu
tes
and
fle
et o
per
ato
rs m
ust
dev
elo
p a
wri
tten
id
lin
g p
oli
cy (
as r
equ
ired
by
Tit
le 1
3,
Sec
tio
n 2
44
9 o
f th
e C
alif
orn
ia C
od
e o
f R
egu
lati
on
s.)
i)
All
co
nst
ruct
ion
equ
ipm
ent
shal
l b
e m
ain
tain
ed a
nd
pro
per
ly t
un
ed i
n a
cco
rdan
ce w
ith
th
e
man
ufa
ctu
rer’
s sp
ecif
icat
ion
s.
All
eq
uip
men
t sh
all
be
chec
ked
by a
cer
tifi
ed m
ech
anic
an
d
det
erm
ined
to
be
runn
ing i
n p
rop
er c
on
dit
ion
pri
or
to o
per
atio
n.
j)
Po
st a
pub
licl
y v
isib
le s
ign
th
at i
ncl
ud
es t
he
contr
acto
r’s
nam
e an
d t
elep
hon
e n
um
ber
to
con
tact
regar
din
g d
ust
co
mp
lain
ts.
Wh
en c
on
tact
ed,
the
contr
acto
r sh
all
resp
ond
an
d t
ake
corr
ecti
ve
acti
on
wit
hin
48
hou
rs.
Th
e te
leph
on
e n
um
ber
s o
f co
nta
cts
at t
he
Cit
y a
nd
th
e B
AA
QM
D s
hal
l
also
be
vis
ible
. T
his
in
form
atio
n m
ay b
e p
ost
ed o
n o
ther
req
uir
ed o
n-s
ite
sign
age.
On
go
ing t
hro
ugho
ut
dem
oli
tio
n,
gra
din
g,
and
/or
con
stru
ctio
n
Cit
y/P
ort
PA
GE
4
2012
OA
RB
PR
OJE
CT
SC
A/M
MR
P (
RE
VIS
ED
BY
CIT
Y C
OU
NC
IL 7
-16-1
3)
En
vir
on
men
tal
Imp
act
S
tan
dard
Co
nd
itio
ns
of
Ap
pro
val/
Mit
igati
on
Mea
sures
Mit
igati
on
Im
ple
men
tati
on
/
Mon
itori
ng
:
Sch
ed
ule
R
esp
on
sib
ilit
y
k)
All
ex
po
sed
su
rfac
es sh
all
be
wat
ered
at
a
freq
uen
cy ad
equ
ate
to m
ain
tain
m
inim
um
so
il
mo
istu
re o
f 1
2 p
erce
nt.
M
ois
ture
co
nte
nt
can b
e ver
ifie
d b
y l
ab s
amp
les
or
mo
istu
re p
rob
e.
l)
All
ex
cavat
ion
, gra
din
g,
and
d
emo
liti
on
ac
tivit
ies
shal
l b
e su
spen
ded
w
hen
av
erag
e w
ind
spee
ds
exce
ed 2
0 m
ph
.
m)
Inst
all
san
db
ags
or
oth
er e
rosi
on
co
ntr
ol
mea
sure
s to
pre
ven
t si
lt r
un
off
to
pub
lic
road
way
s.
n)
Hyd
rose
ed o
r ap
ply
(n
on
-to
xic
) so
il s
tab
iliz
ers
to i
nac
tive
con
stru
ctio
n a
reas
(p
revio
usl
y g
rad
ed
area
s in
acti
ve
for
on
e m
on
th o
r m
ore
).
o)
Des
ign
ate
a p
erso
n o
r p
erso
ns
to m
on
ito
r th
e du
st c
on
tro
l p
rogra
m a
nd
to
ord
er i
ncr
ease
d
wat
erin
g,
as n
eces
sary
, to
pre
ven
t tr
ansp
ort
of
du
st o
ffsi
te.
Th
eir
du
ties
sh
all
incl
ud
e h
oli
day
s
and
wee
ken
d p
erio
ds
wh
en w
ork
may
no
t b
e in
pro
gre
ss.
p)
Inst
all
app
rop
riat
e w
ind
b
reak
s (e
.g.,
tr
ees,
fe
nce
s)
on
th
e w
ind
war
d
sid
e(s)
o
f ac
tivel
y
dis
turb
ed a
reas
of
the
con
stru
ctio
n s
ite
to m
inim
ize
win
d b
low
n d
ust
. W
ind
bre
aks
mu
st h
ave
a
max
imu
m 5
0 p
erce
nt
air
po
rosi
ty.
q)
Veg
etat
ive
gro
un
d c
over
(e.
g.,
fas
t-ger
min
atin
g n
ativ
e gra
ss s
eed
) sh
all
be
pla
nte
d i
n d
istu
rbed
area
s as
so
on
as
po
ssib
le a
nd w
ater
ed a
pp
rop
riat
ely u
nti
l veg
etat
ion
is
esta
bli
shed
.
r)
Th
e si
mu
ltan
eou
s o
ccu
rren
ce
of
exca
vat
ion
, gra
din
g,
and
gro
un
d-d
istu
rbin
g
con
stru
ctio
n
acti
vit
ies
on
th
e sa
me
area
at
any o
ne
tim
e sh
all
be
lim
ited
. A
ctiv
itie
s sh
all
be
ph
ased
to
red
uce
the
amo
un
t o
f d
istu
rbed
su
rfac
es a
t an
y o
ne
tim
e.
s)
All
tru
cks
and
eq
uip
men
t, i
ncl
ud
ing t
ires
, sh
all
be
was
hed
off
pri
or
to l
eavin
g t
he
site
.
t)
Sit
e ac
cess
es t
o a
dis
tan
ce o
f 1
00
fee
t fr
om
th
e p
aved
ro
ad s
hal
l b
e tr
eate
d w
ith
a 6
to
12
in
ch
com
pac
ted
lay
er o
f w
oo
d c
hip
s, m
ulc
h,
or
gra
vel
.
u)
All
eq
uip
men
t to
be
use
d o
n t
he
con
stru
ctio
n s
ite
and
su
bje
ct t
o t
he
req
uir
emen
ts o
f T
itle
13
,
Sec
tio
n 2
44
9 o
f th
e C
alif
orn
ia C
od
e o
f R
egu
lati
on
s (“
Cal
ifo
rnia
Air
Res
ou
rces
Bo
ard
Off
-
Ro
ad D
iese
l R
egu
lati
on
s”)
mu
st m
eet
Em
issi
on
s an
d P
erfo
rman
ce R
equ
irem
ents
on
e yea
r in
advan
ce o
f an
y f
leet
dea
dli
nes
. T
he
pro
ject
ap
pli
can
t sh
all
pro
vid
e w
ritt
en d
ocu
men
tati
on t
hat
the
flee
t re
qu
irem
ents
hav
e b
een
met
.
v)
Use
lo
w V
OC
(i.
e.,
RO
G)
coat
ings
bey
on
d t
he
loca
l re
qu
irem
ents
(i.
e.,
BA
AQ
MD
Reg
ula
tio
n
8,
Rule
3:
Arc
hit
ectu
ral
Co
atin
gs)
.
Mit
igati
on
4.4
-3a:
Th
e P
ort
sh
all
dev
elo
p a
nd
im
ple
men
t a
crit
eria
po
lluta
nt
redu
ctio
n p
rogra
m
aim
ed a
t re
du
cin
g o
r o
ff-s
etti
ng P
ort
-rel
ated
em
issi
on
s in
Wes
t O
akla
nd
fro
m i
ts m
arit
ime
and
rai
l
op
erat
ion
s to
le
ss th
an si
gn
ific
ant
level
s, co
nsi
sten
t w
ith
ap
pli
cab
le fe
der
al,
stat
e an
d lo
cal
air
qu
alit
y st
and
ard
s. T
he
pro
gra
m sh
all
be
suff
icie
ntl
y fu
nd
ed to
str
ive
to re
du
ce em
issi
on
s fr
om
red
evel
op
men
t re
late
d
con
trib
uto
rs
to
loca
l W
est
Oak
lan
d
air
qu
alit
y,
and
sh
all
con
tinu
ally
reex
amin
e p
ote
nti
al r
edu
ctio
ns
tow
ard
ach
ievin
g l
ess
than
sig
nif
ican
t im
pac
ts a
s n
ew t
ech
no
logie
s
emer
ge.
Th
e ad
op
ted
pro
gra
m s
hal
l d
efin
e m
easu
rab
le r
edu
ctio
ns
wit
hin
sp
ecif
ic t
ime
per
iod
s.
Th
is p
rogra
m s
hal
l b
e p
erio
dic
ally
rev
iew
ed a
nd
up
dat
ed e
ver
y o
ne
to t
hre
e yea
rs,
corr
esp
on
din
g t
o
regu
lar
up
dat
es
of
the
CA
P.
Th
e re
vie
w
and
u
pd
ate
shal
l in
clu
de,
an
d
no
t b
e li
mit
ed
to,
an
asse
ssm
ent
of
any
po
ten
tial
n
ew
stra
tegie
s,
a re
asse
ssm
ent
of
fun
din
g
req
uir
emen
ts,
tech
nic
al
Pri
or
to s
tart
ing
op
erat
ion
s
Po
rt
2012
OA
RB
PR
OJE
CT
SC
A/M
MR
P (
RE
VIS
ED
BY
CIT
Y C
OU
NC
IL 7
-16-1
3)
PA
GE
5
En
vir
on
men
tal
Imp
act
S
tan
dard
Co
nd
itio
ns
of
Ap
pro
val/
Mit
igati
on
Mea
sures
Mit
igati
on
Im
ple
men
tati
on
/
Mon
itori
ng
:
Sch
ed
ule
R
esp
on
sib
ilit
y
feas
ibil
ity,
and
co
st b
enef
it a
ssu
mp
tion
s. P
erio
dic
upd
ates
sh
all
be
sub
mit
ted
to
th
e C
ity/P
ort
Lia
iso
n
Co
mm
itte
e o
r it
s eq
uiv
alen
t.
Th
e p
oll
uta
nt
redu
ctio
n p
rogra
m s
hal
l giv
e p
rio
rity
to
em
issi
on
red
uct
ion
str
ateg
ies
that
ad
dre
ss
PM
10 e
mis
sio
ns,
bu
t sh
all
also
pro
vid
e fo
r re
du
ctio
ns
in N
Ox a
nd
RO
G e
mis
sio
ns.
Th
e em
issi
on
red
uct
ion
pro
gra
m s
hal
l in
clu
de
a li
st o
f p
ote
nti
al e
mis
sio
n r
edu
ctio
n s
trat
egie
s. S
trat
egie
s th
at s
hal
l
be
incl
ud
ed i
n t
he
pro
gra
m a
nd
im
ple
men
ted
over
th
e b
uil
dou
t p
erio
d i
ncl
ud
e:
• T
he
Po
rt sh
all
exp
and
it
s ex
isti
ng ca
rgo
h
and
lin
g eq
uip
men
t re
-po
wer
ing an
d re
tro
fitt
ing
pro
gra
m (
par
t o
f th
e B
erth
s 5
5-5
8 P
roje
ct a
ir q
ual
ity m
itig
atio
n p
rogra
m)
to i
ncl
ud
e m
arin
e
and
rai
l te
rmin
al y
ard
eq
uip
men
t ad
ded
or
relo
cate
d a
s p
art
of
red
evel
op
men
t b
uil
d-o
ut.
• T
he
Po
rt s
hal
l ex
ten
d i
ts g
ran
t p
rogra
m (
par
t o
f th
e B
erth
s 5
5-5
8 P
roje
ct a
ir q
ual
ity m
itig
atio
n
pro
gra
m)
to p
rovid
e fi
nan
cial
in
cen
tives
to
tu
gb
oat
op
erat
ors
at
New
Ber
th 2
1 a
nd
oth
er P
ort
faci
liti
es t
o i
mp
lem
ent
emis
sio
n r
edu
ctio
n c
on
tro
l m
easu
res
or
to r
epla
ce t
ugb
oat
en
gin
es t
o
low
NO
x t
ech
no
logy.
• T
he
Po
rt s
hal
l re
qu
ire
rail
ter
min
al o
per
ato
rs t
o u
se s
wit
ch e
ngin
es a
t th
e N
ew I
nte
rmo
dal
Fac
ilit
y t
hat
co
mp
ly w
ith
fed
eral
air
em
issi
on
reg
ula
tio
ns
for
die
sel
op
erat
ed l
oco
mo
tives
as
set
fort
h i
n f
eder
al a
ir r
egu
lati
ons.
In
add
itio
n,
the
rail
ter
min
al o
per
ato
r an
d t
he
Po
rt a
re t
o
exch
ange
info
rmat
ion
wit
h t
he
go
al o
f in
ves
tigat
ing o
pti
on
s to
acc
eler
ate
com
pli
ance
wit
h
Tie
r 0
, 1
and
2 r
equir
emen
ts o
f th
e fe
der
al r
egu
lati
on
s.
• T
he
Po
rt s
hal
l no
t p
recl
ud
e in
its
des
ign
of
the
New
In
term
od
al F
acil
ity t
he
inst
alla
tio
n o
f an
alte
rnat
ive
fuel
ing s
tati
on
an
d s
hal
l to
th
e ex
ten
t fe
asib
le a
cco
mm
od
ate
such
a f
uel
ing s
tati
on
.
• T
he
Po
rt s
hal
l en
cou
rage
ship
s to
im
ple
men
t so
urc
e co
ntr
ol
tech
no
logie
s w
hen
in
th
e po
rt a
rea
(su
ch a
s re
du
ced
hote
lin
g).
Oth
er s
trat
egie
s to
be
incl
ud
ed i
n t
he
Po
rt c
rite
ria
po
lluta
nt
redu
ctio
n p
rogra
m w
hen
tec
hn
ical
ly a
nd
eco
no
mic
ally
fea
sib
le,
incl
ud
e:
• In
clu
sion
of
an a
lter
nat
ive
fuel
ing f
acil
ity a
t th
e N
ew I
nte
rmo
dal
Fac
ilit
y.
Mit
igati
on
4
.4-3
b (W
est
Gate
way
R
ail
an
d M
ari
tim
e E
mis
sion
s R
edu
ctio
n P
rog
ram
): T
he
gro
un
d l
esse
e o
f th
e W
est
Gat
eway
an
d t
he
Rai
lro
ad R
igh
t o
f W
ay (
“WG
Gro
un
d L
esse
e”)
shal
l
dev
elo
p,
for
Cit
y r
evie
w a
nd
ap
pro
val
, a
crit
eria
poll
uta
nt
red
uct
ion
pro
gra
m a
imed
at
red
uci
ng o
r
off
-set
tin
g e
mis
sio
ns
fro
m i
ts r
ail-
rela
ted
and
mar
itim
e-re
late
d o
per
atio
ns,
to t
he
exte
nt
feas
ible
, to
less
th
an
sign
ific
ant
level
s,
con
sist
ent
wit
h
app
lica
ble
fe
der
al,
stat
e an
d
loca
l ai
r q
ual
ity
stan
dar
ds.
T
he
WG
G
rou
nd
Les
see
shal
l im
ple
men
t th
e ap
pro
ved
pro
gra
m a
nd
sh
all
per
iod
ical
ly
revie
w a
nd
up
dat
e th
e p
rogra
m e
ver
y o
ne
to t
hre
e ye
ars,
co
ncu
rren
tly w
ith
th
e u
pdat
e o
f th
e B
ay
Are
a C
lean
Air
Pla
n.
Th
e re
vie
w a
nd
up
dat
e sh
all
incl
ude,
an
d n
ot
be
lim
ited
to
, as
sess
men
t o
f:
po
ten
tial
new
red
uct
ion
stra
tegie
s b
ased
o
n
then
-avai
lable
te
chno
logie
s;
fun
din
g
req
uir
emen
ts;
tech
nic
al
feas
ibil
ity;
eco
no
mic
fea
sib
ilit
y a
nd
co
st b
enef
it a
nal
ysis
. T
he
up
dat
es s
hal
l be
sub
mit
ted
to
th
e C
ity f
or
its
Pri
or
to s
tart
ing
op
erat
ion
s
Cit
y
PA
GE
6
2012
OA
RB
PR
OJE
CT
SC
A/M
MR
P (
RE
VIS
ED
BY
CIT
Y C
OU
NC
IL 7
-16-1
3)
En
vir
on
men
tal
Imp
act
S
tan
dard
Co
nd
itio
ns
of
Ap
pro
val/
Mit
igati
on
Mea
sures
Mit
igati
on
Im
ple
men
tati
on
/
Mon
itori
ng
:
Sch
ed
ule
R
esp
on
sib
ilit
y
revie
w
and
ap
pro
val
.
Th
e W
G
Gro
un
d
Les
see
shal
l im
ple
men
t th
e C
ity-
app
roved
, u
pd
ated
pro
gra
m.
Th
e pro
gra
m s
hal
l giv
e p
rio
rity
to
em
issi
on
red
uct
ion
str
ateg
ies
that
ad
dre
ss P
M1
0 e
mis
sio
ns,
but
shal
l al
so p
rovid
e fo
r re
du
ctio
ns
in N
OX
and
RO
G e
mis
sio
ns.
Th
e em
issi
on
red
uct
ion
pro
gra
m
shal
l in
clu
de
a li
st o
f p
ote
nti
al e
mis
sio
n r
edu
ctio
n s
trat
egie
s an
d s
hal
l d
efin
e m
easu
rab
le r
edu
ctio
n
go
als
wit
hin
sp
ecif
ic t
ime
per
iod
s.
Str
ateg
ies
that
sh
all
be
incl
ud
ed i
n t
he
pro
gra
m m
ay i
ncl
ud
e w
ith
ou
t li
mit
atio
n:
• R
equ
irin
g
rail
te
rmin
al
op
erat
ors
to
use
sw
itch
en
gin
es
that
co
mp
ly
wit
h
fed
eral
ai
r
emis
sio
n r
egu
lati
on
s fo
r d
iese
l o
per
ated
lo
com
oti
ves
as
set
fort
h i
n f
eder
al
air
regu
lati
on
s.
In
add
itio
n,
the
rail
ter
min
al o
per
ato
r an
d t
he
WG
Gro
un
d L
esse
e to
ex
chan
ge
info
rmat
ion
w
ith
the
go
al
of
inves
tigat
ing o
pti
ons
to ac
cele
rate
co
mp
lian
ce w
ith
Tie
r 0
, 1
an
d 2
req
uir
emen
ts
of
the
fed
eral
reg
ula
tio
ns.
• E
nco
ura
ge
ship
s to
im
ple
men
t so
urc
e co
ntr
ol
tech
no
logie
s w
hen
in
the
Wes
t G
atew
ay a
rea
(su
ch a
s re
du
ced
ho
teli
ng).
• W
ork
ing
wit
h
tugb
oat
o
per
ato
rs
to
imple
men
t em
issi
on
re
duct
ion
co
ntr
ol
mea
sure
s o
r to
re
pla
ce t
ugb
oat
en
gin
es t
o l
ow
NO
x t
ech
no
logy.
Mit
igati
on
4.4
-4:
Th
e C
ity a
nd
th
e P
ort
sh
all
join
tly c
reat
e, m
ain
tain
an
d f
un
d o
n a
fai
r sh
are
bas
is,
a tr
uck
die
sel
emis
sio
n r
edu
ctio
n p
rogra
m.
Th
e p
rogra
m s
hal
l b
e su
ffic
ien
tly f
un
ded
to
str
ive
to
red
uce
red
evel
op
men
t re
late
d c
on
trib
uti
on
s to
lo
cal
Wes
t O
akla
nd
die
sel
emis
sio
ns
to l
ess
than
sign
ific
ant
level
s, c
on
sist
ent
wit
h a
pp
lica
ble
fed
eral
, st
ate
and
lo
cal
air
qu
alit
y s
tan
dar
ds,
an
d s
hal
l
con
tin
ual
ly r
eexam
ine
po
ten
tial
red
uct
ion
s to
war
d a
chie
vin
g l
ess
than
sig
nif
ican
t im
pac
ts a
s n
ew
tech
no
logie
s em
erge.
T
he
ado
pte
d p
rogra
m s
hal
l d
efin
e m
easu
rab
le r
edu
ctio
n w
ith
in s
pec
ific
tim
e
per
iod
s.
Th
is p
rogra
m s
hal
l b
e p
erio
dic
ally
rev
iew
ed a
nd
up
dat
ed e
ver
y o
ne
to t
hre
e yea
rs,
corr
esp
on
din
g t
o
regu
lar
up
dat
es
of
the
CA
P.
Th
e re
vie
w
and
u
pd
ate
shal
l in
clu
de,
an
d
no
t b
e li
mit
ed
to,
an
asse
ssm
ent
of
any
po
ten
tial
n
ew
stra
tegie
s,
a re
asse
ssm
ent
of
fun
din
g
req
uir
emen
ts,
tech
nic
al
feas
ibil
ity,
and
co
st b
enef
it a
ssu
mp
tion
s. P
erio
dic
upd
ates
sh
all
be
sub
mit
ted
to
th
e C
ity/P
ort
Lia
iso
n
Co
mm
itte
e o
r it
s eq
uiv
alen
t.
Th
e d
iese
l em
issi
on
s re
du
ctio
n p
rogra
m s
hal
l in
clud
e a
list
of
po
ten
tial
em
issi
on
red
uct
ion
str
ateg
ies
that
sh
all
incl
ud
e o
n-s
ite
Po
rt
imp
rovem
ents
an
d/o
r p
ract
ices
; lo
an,
gra
nt
or
ince
nti
ve-
bas
ed
pro
gra
ms;
an
d o
n-g
oin
g s
tudie
s.
Str
ateg
ies
that
sh
all
be
incl
ud
ed i
n t
he
die
sel
emis
sio
ns
red
uct
ion
pro
gra
m a
nd
im
ple
men
ted
over
th
e
bu
ild
-ou
t p
erio
d i
ncl
ud
e th
e fo
llow
ing:
1.
On
-sit
e P
ort
im
pro
vem
ents
.
• C
on
figu
re t
ruck
par
kin
g i
n t
he
Port
to
min
imiz
e tr
affi
c in
terf
eren
ce a
nd
red
uce
id
lin
g t
imes
.
Pri
or
to o
per
atio
ns
Cit
y/P
ort
2012
OA
RB
PR
OJE
CT
SC
A/M
MR
P (
RE
VIS
ED
BY
CIT
Y C
OU
NC
IL 7
-16-1
3)
PA
GE
7
En
vir
on
men
tal
Imp
act
S
tan
dard
Co
nd
itio
ns
of
Ap
pro
val/
Mit
igati
on
Mea
sures
Mit
igati
on
Im
ple
men
tati
on
/
Mon
itori
ng
:
Sch
ed
ule
R
esp
on
sib
ilit
y
• A
llo
w e
asy a
cces
s to
a t
ruck
par
kin
g f
acil
ity a
t th
e P
ort
24
-hou
rs a
day
.
• S
yn
chro
niz
e tr
affi
c li
gh
ts i
n t
he
Po
rt a
rea
to r
edu
ce c
on
ges
tion
(re
qu
ires
co
ord
inat
ion w
ith
th
e
Cit
y).
2.
Cit
y/P
ort
lo
an o
r gra
nt/
ince
nti
ve
pro
gra
ms
for
loca
l bu
sin
esse
s o
r en
titi
es.
• P
rovid
e in
cen
tives
fo
r re
-po
wer
ing,
retr
ofi
ttin
g,
elec
trif
yin
g,
or
swit
chin
g t
o a
lter
nat
ive
fuel
s
to l
oca
l bu
sin
esse
s, f
ran
chis
es o
r tr
uck
fle
ets
op
erat
ing i
n W
est
Oak
lan
d.
Su
ch b
usi
nes
ses
may
incl
ud
e, f
or
exam
ple
, lo
call
y o
wn
ed a
nd
op
erat
ed t
ruck
ing o
per
atio
ns,
ref
use
an
d r
ecycl
ing
coll
ecti
on v
ehic
les,
sch
oo
l bu
ses,
Po
rt a
nd
/or
Cit
y f
leet
veh
icle
s, a
nd
US
Mai
l tr
uck
s.
Oth
er s
trat
egie
s to
be
incl
ud
ed i
n t
he
die
sel
emis
sio
ns
red
uct
ion
pro
gra
m t
o b
e ex
amin
ed a
nd
inco
rpo
rate
wh
en t
ech
nic
ally
an
d e
con
om
ical
ly f
easi
ble
, in
clu
de
the
foll
ow
ing:
1.
On
-sit
e P
ort
im
pro
vem
ents
.
• A
llo
w t
ruck
s u
sin
g a
lter
nat
ive
fuel
s to
th
e h
ead
of
qu
eues
or
hav
e se
par
ate
gat
e en
tran
ces.
2.
On
-goin
g s
tud
ies.
•
Exp
lore
met
ho
ds
to m
inim
ize
tru
ck i
dli
ng t
imes
at
the
Po
rt.
• E
xp
lore
and
en
cou
rage
the
use
of
alte
rnat
ive
fuel
s fo
r P
ort
mar
ine,
rai
l an
d t
ruck
op
erat
ion
s.
• P
ropo
se a
nd
fu
nd
a r
and
om
ro
adsi
de
hea
vy d
uty
die
sel
veh
icle
(H
DD
V)
emis
sio
ns
test
ing
p
rogra
m a
nd
an
HD
DV
rep
air
subsi
dy p
rogra
m.
3.
Cit
y/P
ort
lo
an o
r gra
nt/
ince
nti
ve
pro
gra
ms
for
loca
l b
usi
nes
ses
or
enti
ties
.
• P
rovid
e su
bsi
die
s,
trai
nin
g
pro
gra
ms
and
/or
vo
uch
er
pro
gra
ms
for
loca
l W
est
Oak
lan
d
bu
sin
esse
s to
con
du
ct t
imin
g r
etar
d,
com
pre
ssio
ns
chan
ges
an
d o
ther
ad
just
men
ts t
o d
iese
l
engin
es t
o r
edu
ce e
mis
sio
ns.
• In
stal
l o
xid
ativ
e ca
taly
st a
nd
par
ticu
late
tra
ps
on
die
sel
engin
es w
ith
lo
w N
Ox,
alte
rnat
ivel
y
fuel
ed o
r el
ectr
ifie
d e
ngin
es.
Mit
igati
on
M
easu
re
4.4
-5:
Maj
or
dev
elo
per
s1
shal
l fu
nd
o
n
a fa
ir
shar
e b
asis
B
AA
QM
D
–
reco
mm
end
ed f
easi
ble
Tra
nsp
ort
atio
n C
on
tro
l M
easu
res
(TC
Ms)
fo
r re
du
cin
g v
ehic
le e
mis
sio
ns
fro
m c
om
mer
cial
, in
stit
uti
on
al,
and
ind
ust
rial
op
erat
ion
s, a
s w
ell
as a
ll C
AP
TC
Ms
the
BA
AQ
MD
has
id
enti
fied
as
app
rop
riat
e fo
r lo
cal
imp
lem
enta
tio
n.
Eac
h m
ajo
r d
evel
op
er o
f a
sub
seq
uen
t re
dev
elo
pm
ent
acti
vit
y s
hal
l fu
nd
its
fai
r sh
are
tow
ard
so
me
or
all
of
the
foll
ow
ing T
CM
s:
Pri
or
to o
per
atio
ns
Cit
y/P
ort
1 D
efin
ed a
s C
ity,
Port
, an
d p
rivat
e d
evel
op
ers
wh
ose
su
bse
qu
ent
red
evel
op
men
t ac
tivit
y w
ou
ld g
ener
ate
more
th
an 2
0,0
00
squ
are
feet
of
emp
loym
ent-
gen
erat
ing l
and u
ses,
or
that
wou
ld g
ener
ate
10
0 o
r gre
ater
loca
l jo
bs.
PA
GE
8
2012
OA
RB
PR
OJE
CT
SC
A/M
MR
P (
RE
VIS
ED
BY
CIT
Y C
OU
NC
IL 7
-16-1
3)
En
vir
on
men
tal
Imp
act
S
tan
dard
Co
nd
itio
ns
of
Ap
pro
val/
Mit
igati
on
Mea
sures
Mit
igati
on
Im
ple
men
tati
on
/
Mon
itori
ng
:
Sch
ed
ule
R
esp
on
sib
ilit
y
BA
AQ
MD
-Reco
mm
en
ded
Tra
nsp
orta
tio
n C
on
trol
Mea
sure, M
od
ifie
d f
or t
his
Acti
on
Co
ntr
ol
Mea
sure
Mea
sure
1
Co
nst
ruct
tr
ansi
t fa
cili
ties
su
ch
as
bu
s tu
rnou
ts/b
us
bu
lbs,
b
ench
es,
shel
ters
, et
c.
Imp
rove
tran
sit
bu
s se
rvic
e to
th
e ar
ea.
2
Des
ign
an
d l
oca
te b
uil
din
gs
to f
acil
itat
e tr
ansi
t ac
cess
, e.
g.,
lo
cate
bu
ild
ing e
ntr
ance
s
nea
r tr
ansi
t st
op
s, e
lim
inat
e b
uil
din
g s
etb
acks,
etc
.
3
Pro
vid
e an
d m
ake
pu
bli
c tr
ansi
t co
nven
ien
t fo
r 1
6th
an
d W
ood
su
b-d
istr
ict
resi
den
ts
and
ten
ants
. (N
ote
: N
ot
app
lica
ble
to
th
e 2
01
2 O
AR
B P
roje
ct)
4
En
cou
rage
OA
RB
su
b-d
istr
ict
ten
ants
to
use
car
po
ols
, van
po
ols
, an
d p
ub
lic
tran
sit
by
pro
vid
ing i
nce
nti
ves
.
5
Pro
vid
e a
shu
ttle
to
and
fro
m t
he
Wes
t O
akla
nd
BA
RT
sta
tio
n
6
Pro
vid
e o
n-s
ite
sho
ps
and
ser
vic
es f
or
emp
loyee
s, s
uch
as
cafe
teri
a, b
ank,
dry
cle
aner
s,
con
ven
ien
ce m
arket
, et
c.
7
Pro
vid
e on
-sit
e ch
ild
car
e, o
r co
ntr
ibu
te t
o o
ff-s
ite
chil
d c
are
wit
hin
wal
kin
g d
ista
nce
.
8
Est
abli
sh
mid
-day
sh
utt
le
serv
ice
fro
m
wo
rksi
te
to
foo
d
serv
ice
esta
bli
shm
ents
/co
mm
erci
al a
reas
.
9
Pro
vid
e p
refe
ren
tial
par
kin
g f
or
carp
oo
l an
d v
anp
oo
l veh
icle
s
10
Imp
lem
ent
par
kin
g f
ees
for
sin
gle
occ
up
ancy
veh
icle
co
mm
ute
rs.
11
Pro
vid
e se
cure
, w
eath
er-p
rote
cted
bic
ycl
e p
arkin
g f
or
emp
loyee
s.
12
Pro
vid
e sa
fe,
dir
ect
acce
ss f
or
bic
ycl
ists
to
ad
jace
nt
bic
ycl
e ro
ute
s.
13
Pro
vid
e sh
ow
ers
and
lo
cker
s fo
r em
plo
yee
s b
icycl
ing o
r w
alkin
g t
o w
ork
.
14
Pro
vid
e d
irec
t,
safe
, at
trac
tive
ped
estr
ian
ac
cess
fr
om
p
roje
ct
to
tran
sit
sto
ps
and
adja
cen
t d
evel
op
men
t.
15
Pro
vid
e n
eigh
bo
rho
od
-ser
vin
g s
ho
ps
and
ser
vic
es w
ith
in o
r ad
jace
nt
to t
he
16
th a
nd
Wo
od
sub
-dis
tric
t. (
No
te:
No
t a
pp
lica
ble
to t
he
201
2 O
AR
B P
roje
ct)
Sou
rce
: B
AA
QM
D 1
99
6,
as a
men
ded
th
rou
gh
199
9.
Bas
ed o
n T
able
15
: “M
itig
atio
n M
easu
res
for
Red
uci
ng M
oto
r V
ehic
le E
mis
sio
ns
fro
m C
om
mer
cial
, In
stit
uti
on
al,
and
In
du
stri
al P
roje
cts.
”
2012
OA
RB
PR
OJE
CT
SC
A/M
MR
P (
RE
VIS
ED
BY
CIT
Y C
OU
NC
IL 7
-16-1
3)
PA
GE
9
En
vir
on
men
tal
Imp
act
S
tan
dard
Co
nd
itio
ns
of
Ap
pro
val/
Mit
igati
on
Mea
sures
Mit
igati
on
Im
ple
men
tati
on
/
Mon
itori
ng
:
Sch
ed
ule
R
esp
on
sib
ilit
y
Eac
h m
ajo
r d
evel
op
er o
f a
sub
sequ
ent
red
evel
op
men
t ac
tivit
y s
hal
l al
so f
un
d i
ts f
air
shar
e o
f th
e
foll
ow
ing C
AP
TC
Ms,
wh
ich
th
e B
AA
QM
D h
as i
den
tifi
ed a
s ap
pro
pri
ate
for
loca
l im
ple
men
tati
on
,
wit
h r
edev
elo
pm
ent-
spec
ific
mo
dif
icat
ion
s:
CA
P T
CM
s D
esc
rip
tio
n
1.
Su
pp
ort
Vo
lunta
ry
Em
plo
yer
-
Bas
ed
Tri
p
Red
uct
ion
Pro
gra
ms
Th
e C
ity a
nd
Po
rt w
ill
exp
lore
way
s to
pro
mo
te t
ran
sit
use
an
d s
upp
ort
emp
loyer
-bas
ed t
rip
red
uct
ion
pro
gra
ms
thro
ugh
dev
elo
pm
ent
ince
nti
ves
such
as
den
sity
bon
use
s, r
edu
ced
par
kin
g r
equ
irem
ents
, in
cen
tives
fo
r
per
man
ent
bic
ycl
e fa
cili
ties
, et
c.
Th
e C
ity
wil
l en
cou
rage
dev
elo
pm
ent
of
tran
sit
tran
sfer
st
atio
ns
nea
r
emp
loym
ent
con
cen
trat
ion
s in
th
e G
atew
ay
dev
elo
pm
ent
area
an
d
16
th/W
oo
d s
ub
-dis
tric
t.
9.
Imp
rove
Bic
ycl
e A
cces
s
and
Fac
ilit
ies
Red
evel
op
men
t in
clu
des
exte
nsi
ve
mu
lti-
use
tra
ils
serv
ing a
s b
oth
“sp
ine”
tho
rou
gh
fare
s an
d “
spu
rs”
con
nec
tin
g m
ain
tra
ils
to t
he
Oak
lan
d
wat
erfr
on
t.
Th
e C
ity a
nd
Po
rt w
ill
enco
ura
ge
emp
loyer
s an
d d
evel
op
ers
to p
rovid
e
per
man
ent
bic
ycl
e fa
cili
ties
.
12
. Im
pro
ve
Art
eria
l T
raff
ic
Man
agem
ent
Mar
itim
e S
tree
t an
d
oth
er
road
way
s in
th
e p
roje
ct
area
w
ill
incl
ude
faci
liti
es t
o e
nco
ura
ge
bic
ycl
ing a
nd
wal
kin
g.
Ro
adw
ays
and
in
ters
ecti
on
s w
ill
be
des
ign
ed t
o o
per
ate
at C
ity-s
tan
dar
d
LO
S,
to f
acil
itat
e tr
affi
c fl
ow
an
d a
vo
id u
nn
eces
sary
qu
euin
g.
15
. L
oca
l C
lean
Air
p
lan
s,
Po
lici
es
and
Pro
gra
ms
Red
evel
op
men
t as
p
rese
nte
d
in
Ch
apte
r 2
.0
Pro
ject
D
escr
ipti
on
an
d
Ch
apte
rs 3
.3 A
ir Q
ual
ity a
nd
3.1
6 T
ran
spo
rtat
ion
an
d T
raff
ic (
in t
he
2012
OA
RB
Pro
ject
Init
ial
Stu
dy/A
dd
end
um
), i
nco
rpo
rate
lan
d u
ses
such
as
a
rail
ter
min
al i
n c
on
jun
ctio
n w
ith
lo
gis
tics
use
s, a
nd m
easu
res
inte
nd
ed t
o
red
uce
th
e n
um
ber
an
d
len
gth
o
f tr
uck
tr
ips
and
si
ngle
-occ
up
ant
auto
mo
bil
e tr
ips.
17
. C
on
du
ct
Dem
on
stra
tio
n
Pro
ject
s
Th
e C
ity w
ill
enco
ura
ge
thro
ugh
d
evel
op
men
t in
cen
tives
d
emo
nst
rati
on
pro
ject
s fo
r fl
eet
elec
trif
icat
ion
or
alte
rnat
ive
fuel
ing.
In a
dd
itio
n,
the
Po
rt
wil
l n
ot
pre
clu
de
alte
rnat
ive
fuel
ing i
n i
ts d
esig
n o
f ra
il f
acil
itie
s.
19
. P
edes
tria
n
Tra
vel
OA
RB
an
d M
arit
ime
sub
-dis
tric
ts w
ill
incl
ud
e m
ult
i-u
se t
rail
s to
en
cou
rage
safe
ped
estr
ian
tra
vel
.
PA
GE
10
2012
OA
RB
PR
OJE
CT
SC
A/M
MR
P (
RE
VIS
ED
BY
CIT
Y C
OU
NC
IL 7
-16-1
3)
En
vir
on
men
tal
Imp
act
S
tan
dard
Co
nd
itio
ns
of
Ap
pro
val/
Mit
igati
on
Mea
sures
Mit
igati
on
Im
ple
men
tati
on
/
Mon
itori
ng
:
Sch
ed
ule
R
esp
on
sib
ilit
y
20
. P
rom
ote
Tra
ffic
Cal
min
g
Mea
sure
s
Red
evel
op
men
t w
ill
incl
ud
e tr
affi
c ca
lmin
g
mea
sure
s to
th
e ex
ten
t
app
rop
riat
e,
con
sist
ent
wit
h
the
Gen
eral
P
lan
an
d
sou
nd
traf
fic
man
agem
ent
of
the
pro
ject
are
a.
Sou
rce
: B
AA
QM
D C
EQ
A G
uid
elin
es,
revis
ed 1
99
9 T
able
5.
Th
ese
TC
Ms
shal
l b
e co
ord
inat
ed w
ith
tra
nsp
ort
atio
n d
eman
d m
anag
emen
t (T
DM
) m
easu
res
imp
lem
ente
d u
nd
er S
CA
TR
AN
S-1
.
S
CA
T
RA
NS
-1:
Park
ing
an
d
Tran
sport
ati
on
D
em
an
d
Man
ag
em
en
t,
see
Tra
ffic
an
d
Tra
nsp
ort
ati
on
sec
tion
bel
ow
.
2.
Wo
uld
th
e p
roje
ct v
iola
te a
ny a
ir
qu
alit
y s
tan
dar
d o
r co
ntr
ibu
te
sub
stan
tial
ly t
o a
n e
xis
tin
g o
r
pro
ject
ed a
ir q
ual
ity v
iola
tio
n?
See
ab
ov
e fo
r S
CA
AIR
-2 a
nd
20
02 E
IR M
itig
ati
on
Mea
sures
4.4
-3a, 4
.4-3
b,
4.4
-4,
4.4
-5
SC
A A
IR-1
: C
on
stru
ctio
n M
an
ag
em
en
t P
lan
: T
he
pro
ject
ap
pli
can
t sh
all
sub
mit
to
th
e P
lan
nin
g
and
Zon
ing D
ivis
ion
an
d t
he
Bu
ild
ing S
ervic
es D
ivis
ion
fo
r re
vie
w a
nd
ap
pro
val
a c
on
stru
ctio
n
man
agem
ent
pla
n t
hat
id
enti
fies
th
e co
nd
itio
ns
of
app
roval
an
d m
itig
atio
n m
easu
res
to c
on
stru
ctio
n
imp
acts
of
the
pro
ject
an
d e
xp
lain
s ho
w t
he
pro
ject
ap
pli
can
t w
ill
com
ply
wit
h t
hes
e co
nst
ruct
ion
-
rela
ted
co
ndit
ion
s o
f ap
pro
val
and
mit
igat
ion
mea
sure
s.
Pri
or
to i
ssu
ance
of
a d
emo
liti
on
,
gra
din
g,
or
bu
ild
ing
per
mit
Cit
y/P
ort
Mit
igati
on
4.4
-6:
Tit
le 2
4 o
f th
e In
tern
atio
nal
Bu
ildin
g C
od
e (I
BC
) re
qu
ires
th
at n
ew c
on
stru
ctio
n
incl
ud
e en
erg
y-c
on
serv
ing f
ixtu
res
and
des
ign
s. A
dd
itio
nal
ly,
the
Cit
y a
nd
Po
rt s
hal
l im
ple
men
t su
stai
nab
le d
evel
op
men
t p
oli
cies
an
d s
trat
egie
s re
late
d t
o n
ew d
evel
op
men
t d
esig
n a
nd
con
stru
ctio
n.
Imp
lem
enta
tio
n o
f IB
C r
equ
irem
ents
wo
uld
red
uce
th
e n
eed
fo
r sp
ace
and
wat
er h
eati
ng t
hat
wo
uld
emit
po
llu
tan
ts.
Cit
y an
d P
ort
po
lici
es an
d st
rate
gie
s sh
all
be
con
dit
ion
ed fo
r al
l n
ew d
evel
op
men
t w
ith
in th
e
red
evel
op
men
t p
roje
ct a
rea.
Sp
ecif
ic e
xam
ple
s m
ay i
ncl
ud
e, a
nd
are
no
t li
mit
ed t
o t
he
foll
ow
ing:
• W
oo
d f
ire
hea
tin
g s
hal
l b
e p
roh
ibit
ed i
n n
ew l
ive/
wo
rk d
evel
op
men
t.
• W
her
e si
tin
g al
low
s an
d w
her
e fe
asib
le,
bu
ild
ings
shal
l b
e o
rien
ted
to
ta
ke
advan
tage
of
pas
sive
and
act
ive
clim
ate
con
tro
l d
esig
ns.
• T
o t
he
max
imu
m e
xte
nt
feas
ible
, ce
ntr
al w
ater
hea
tin
g s
yst
ems
shal
l b
e in
stal
led
.
Pri
or
to i
ssu
ance
of
a d
emo
liti
on
,
gra
din
g,
or
bu
ild
ing
per
mit
Cit
y/P
ort
3.
Wo
uld
th
e p
roje
ct r
esu
lt i
n a
cum
ula
tivel
y c
on
sid
erab
le n
et
incr
ease
of
any c
rite
ria
air
po
llu
tan
t
for
wh
ich
th
e p
roje
ct r
egio
n i
s n
on
-
atta
inm
ent
un
der
an a
pp
lica
ble
fed
eral
or
stat
e am
bie
nt
air
qu
alit
y
See
ab
ov
e fo
r S
CA
AIR
-2 a
nd
20
02 E
IR M
itig
ati
on
Mea
sures
4.4
-3a, 4
.4-3
b,
4.4
-4,
4.4
-5 a
nd
4.4
-6
Mit
igati
on
Mea
sure
5.4
-1:
Th
e C
ity a
nd
th
e P
ort
sh
all
enco
ura
ge,
lob
by,
and
po
ten
tial
ly p
arti
cip
ate
in e
mis
sio
n r
edu
ctio
n d
emo
nst
rati
on
pro
ject
s th
at p
rom
ote
tec
hn
olo
gic
al a
dvan
ces
in i
mp
rovin
g a
ir
qu
alit
y.
Pre
-op
erat
ion
s;
Op
erat
ion
s
Cit
y/P
ort
2012
OA
RB
PR
OJE
CT
SC
A/M
MR
P (
RE
VIS
ED
BY
CIT
Y C
OU
NC
IL 7
-16-1
3)
PA
GE
11
En
vir
on
men
tal
Imp
act
S
tan
dard
Co
nd
itio
ns
of
Ap
pro
val/
Mit
igati
on
Mea
sures
Mit
igati
on
Im
ple
men
tati
on
/
Mon
itori
ng
:
Sch
ed
ule
R
esp
on
sib
ilit
y
stan
dar
d (
incl
ud
ing r
elea
sin
g
emis
sio
ns
wh
ich
exce
ed q
uan
tita
tive
thre
sho
lds
for
ozo
ne
pre
curs
ors
)?
Su
ch e
nco
ura
gem
ent,
lob
byin
g,
and
par
tici
pat
ion
may
in
clu
de
the
foll
ow
ing:
• R
etro
fitt
ing l
oco
mo
tive
engin
es t
o m
eet
curr
ent
fed
eral
sta
nd
ard
s.
• U
sin
g r
edu
ced
su
lfu
r fu
els
in s
hip
s w
hil
e th
e sh
ips
are
in t
he
San
Fra
nci
sco
Bay
.
• T
reat
ing N
Ox w
ith
sel
ecti
ve
cata
lyti
c re
du
ctio
ns.
• Im
ple
men
tin
g r
and
om
ro
adsi
de
emis
sio
ns
test
s an
d d
evel
op
a s
yst
em o
f fi
nes
fo
r tr
uck
s n
ot
in
com
pli
ance
wit
h e
mis
sio
n r
egu
lati
on
s.
• E
stab
lish
ing e
mis
sio
ns-
bas
ed b
erth
ing f
ees.
• B
uyin
g r
elat
ivel
y o
ld, h
igh
ly p
oll
uti
ng c
ars
to t
ake
them
off
th
e ro
ad.
Alt
ho
ugh
th
ese
pro
gra
ms
may
as
sist
in
ad
van
cin
g
emis
sio
n
red
uct
ion
te
chn
olo
gie
s o
r
imp
lem
enti
ng e
mis
sio
n r
edu
ctio
n m
eth
od
s, t
he
incr
emen
tal
con
trib
uti
on o
f th
e re
dev
elo
pm
ent
pro
gra
m
wo
uld
re
mai
n
cum
ula
tivel
y
con
sid
erab
le,
and
th
e cu
mu
lati
ve
imp
act
on
ai
r qu
alit
y
rem
ain
s si
gn
ific
ant
and
un
avo
idab
le
4.
Wo
uld
th
e p
roje
ct r
esu
lt i
n a
cum
ula
tivel
y c
on
sid
erab
le n
et
incr
ease
of
any c
rite
ria
air
po
llu
tan
t
for
wh
ich
th
e p
roje
ct r
egio
n i
s n
on
-
atta
inm
ent
un
der
an a
pp
lica
ble
fed
eral
or
stat
e am
bie
nt
air
qu
alit
y
stan
dar
d (
incl
ud
ing r
elea
sin
g
emis
sio
ns
wh
ich
exce
ed q
uan
tita
tive
thre
sho
lds
for
ozo
ne
pre
curs
ors
)?
See
ab
ov
e S
CA
AIR
-1,
SC
A A
IR-2
an
d 2
00
2 E
IR M
itig
ati
on
Mea
sure
s 4
.4-3
a,
4.4
-3b
, 4
.4-4
, 4
.4-5
an
d 4
.4-6
SC
A A
IR-3
: E
xp
osu
re
to A
ir P
oll
uti
on
(T
ox
ic A
ir C
on
tam
ina
nts
: P
art
icu
late
Matt
er):
A.
Indo
or
Air
Qu
alit
y:
In a
cco
rdan
ce w
ith
th
e re
com
men
dat
ion
s o
f th
e C
alif
orn
ia A
ir R
eso
urc
es
Bo
ard
(A
RB
) an
d t
he
Bay
Are
a A
ir Q
ual
ity M
anag
emen
t D
istr
ict,
ap
pro
pri
ate
mea
sure
s sh
all
be
inco
rpo
rate
d i
nto
th
e p
roje
ct d
esig
n i
n o
rder
to r
edu
ce t
he
po
tenti
al h
ealt
h r
isk d
ue
to
exp
osu
re t
o d
iese
l p
arti
cula
te m
atte
r to
ach
ieve
an a
ccep
tab
le i
nte
rio
r ai
r qu
alit
y l
evel
fo
r
sen
siti
ve
rece
pto
rs.
Th
e ap
pro
pri
ate
mea
sure
s sh
all
incl
ud
e on
e o
f th
e fo
llo
win
g m
eth
od
s:
1)
Th
e p
roje
ct a
ppli
can
t sh
all
reta
in a
qu
alif
ied
air
qu
alit
y c
on
sult
ant
to p
rep
are
a h
ealt
h r
isk
asse
ssm
ent
(HR
A)
in a
cco
rdan
ce w
ith
th
e A
RB
an
d t
he
Off
ice
of
En
vir
on
men
tal
Hea
lth
and
Haz
ard
Ass
essm
ent
req
uir
emen
ts t
o d
eter
min
e th
e ex
po
sure
of
pro
ject
resi
den
ts/o
ccu
pan
ts/u
sers
to
air
po
llu
ters
pri
or
to i
ssu
ance
of
a d
emo
liti
on
, gra
din
g, o
r
bu
ild
ing p
erm
it.
Th
e H
RA
sh
all
be
sub
mit
ted
to
th
e P
lan
nin
g a
nd
Zo
nin
g D
ivis
ion
fo
r
revie
w a
nd
ap
pro
val
. T
he
app
lica
nt
shal
l im
ple
men
t th
e ap
pro
ved
HR
A r
eco
m-
men
dat
ion
s, i
f an
y.
If t
he
HR
A c
on
clu
des
th
at t
he
air
qu
alit
y r
isks
fro
m n
earb
y s
ou
rces
are
at o
r b
elo
w a
ccep
tab
le l
evel
s, t
hen
ad
dit
ion
al m
easu
res
are
no
t re
qu
ired
.
2)
Th
e ap
pli
can
t sh
all
imp
lem
ent
all
of
the
foll
ow
ing f
eatu
res
that
hav
e b
een
fo
und
to
red
uce
the
air
qu
alit
y r
isk t
o s
ensi
tive
rece
pto
rs a
nd
sh
all
be
incl
ud
ed i
n t
he
pro
ject
con
stru
ctio
n
pla
ns.
Th
ese
feat
ure
s sh
all
be
subm
itte
d t
o t
he
Pla
nn
ing a
nd Z
on
ing D
ivis
ion
an
d t
he
Bu
ild
ing S
ervic
es D
ivis
ion
fo
r re
vie
w a
nd
ap
pro
val
pri
or
to t
he
issu
ance
of
a d
emo
liti
on
,
gra
din
g,
or
bu
ild
ing p
erm
it a
nd
sh
all
be
mai
nta
ined
on
an
on
go
ing b
asis
du
rin
g o
per
atio
n
of
the
pro
ject
.
a)
Red
esig
n t
he
site
lay
ou
t to
lo
cate
sen
siti
ve
rece
pto
rs a
s fa
r as
po
ssib
le f
rom
an
y
free
way
s, m
ajo
r ro
adw
ays,
or
oth
er s
ou
rces
of
air
po
llu
tio
n (
e.g.,
load
ing d
ock
s,
Pri
or
to i
ssu
ance
of
a d
emo
liti
on
,
gra
din
g,
or
bu
ild
ing
per
mit
Cit
y/P
ort
PA
GE
12
2012
OA
RB
PR
OJE
CT
SC
A/M
MR
P (
RE
VIS
ED
BY
CIT
Y C
OU
NC
IL 7
-16-1
3)
En
vir
on
men
tal
Imp
act
S
tan
dard
Co
nd
itio
ns
of
Ap
pro
val/
Mit
igati
on
Mea
sures
Mit
igati
on
Im
ple
men
tati
on
/
Mon
itori
ng
:
Sch
ed
ule
R
esp
on
sib
ilit
y
par
kin
g l
ots
).
b)
Do
no
t lo
cate
sen
siti
ve
rece
pto
rs n
ear
dis
trib
uti
on c
ente
r’s
entr
y a
nd
exit
po
ints
.
c)
Inco
rpo
rate
tie
red
pla
nti
ngs
of
tree
s (r
edw
oo
d,
deo
dar
ced
ar,
live
oak
, an
d/o
r
ole
and
er)
to t
he
max
imu
m e
xte
nt
feas
ible
bet
wee
n t
he
sou
rces
of
po
llu
tion
and
th
e
sen
siti
ve
rece
pto
rs.
d)
Inst
all,
op
erat
e an
d m
ain
tain
in
go
od w
ork
ing o
rder
a c
entr
al h
eati
ng a
nd
ven
tila
tio
n
(HV
) sy
stem
or
oth
er a
ir t
ake
syst
em i
n t
he
bu
ild
ing,
or
in e
ach
in
div
idu
al r
esid
enti
al
un
it,
that
mee
ts o
r ex
ceed
s an
eff
icie
ncy
sta
nd
ard
of
ME
RV
13
. T
he
HV
syst
em s
hal
l
incl
ud
e th
e fo
llo
win
g f
eatu
res:
In
stal
lati
on
of
a h
igh
eff
icie
ncy
fil
ter
and
/or
carb
on
filt
er t
o f
ilte
r p
arti
cula
tes
and
oth
er c
hem
ical
mat
ter
fro
m e
nte
rin
g t
he
bu
ildin
g.
Eit
her
HE
PA
fil
ters
or
AS
HR
AE
85
% s
up
ply
fil
ters
sh
all
be
use
d.
e)
Ret
ain
a q
ual
ifie
d H
V c
on
sult
ant
or
HE
RS
rat
er d
uri
ng t
he
des
ign
ph
ase
of
the
pro
ject
to
lo
cate
th
e H
V s
yst
em b
ased
on
exp
osu
re m
od
elin
g f
rom
th
e p
oll
uta
nt
sou
rces
.
f)
Inst
all
ind
oo
r ai
r q
ual
ity m
on
ito
rin
g u
nit
s in
bu
ild
ings.
g)
Pro
ject
ap
pli
can
t sh
all
mai
nta
in,
rep
air
and
/or
rep
lace
HV
syst
em o
n a
n o
ngo
ing a
nd
as n
eed
ed b
asis
or
shal
l p
rep
are
an o
per
atio
n a
nd m
ain
ten
ance
man
ual
fo
r th
e H
V
syst
em a
nd
th
e fi
lter
. T
he
man
ual
sh
all
incl
ud
e th
e op
erat
ing i
nst
ruct
ion
s an
d t
he
mai
nte
nan
ce a
nd
rep
lace
men
t sc
hed
ule
. T
his
man
ual
sh
all
be
incl
ud
ed i
n t
he
CC
&R
s
for
resi
den
tial
pro
ject
s an
d d
istr
ibu
ted
to
th
e bu
ildin
g m
ain
ten
ance
sta
ff.
In a
dd
itio
n,
the
app
lica
nt
shal
l p
rep
are
a se
par
ate
ho
meo
wn
ers
man
ual
. T
he
man
ual
sh
all
conta
in
the
op
erat
ing i
nst
ruct
ion
s an
d t
he
mai
nte
nan
ce a
nd
rep
lace
men
t sc
hed
ule
fo
r th
e H
V
syst
em a
nd
th
e fi
lter
s.
B.
Ou
tdoo
r A
ir Q
ual
ity:
To
th
e m
axim
um
exte
nt
pra
ctic
able
, in
div
idual
an
d c
om
mo
n e
xte
rio
r
op
en s
pac
e, i
ncl
ud
ing p
laygro
un
ds,
pat
ios,
an
d d
ecks,
sh
all
eith
er b
e sh
ield
ed f
rom
th
e so
urc
e
of
air
po
llu
tio
n b
y b
uil
din
gs
or
oth
erw
ise
bu
ffer
ed t
o f
urt
her
red
uce
air
po
llu
tio
n f
or
pro
ject
occ
up
ants
.
PA
GE
46
2012
OA
RB
PR
OJE
CT
SC
A/M
MR
P (
RE
VIS
ED
BY
CIT
Y C
OU
NC
IL 7
-16-1
3)
En
vir
on
men
tal
Imp
act
S
tan
dard
Co
nd
itio
ns
of
Ap
pro
val/
Mit
igati
on
Mea
sures
Mit
igati
on
Im
ple
men
tati
on
/
Mon
itori
ng
:
Sch
ed
ule
R
esp
on
sib
ilit
y
com
mu
nit
y n
ois
e in
co
nfl
ict
wit
h t
he
lan
d u
se c
om
pat
ibil
ity g
uid
elin
es o
f
the
Oak
lan
d G
ener
al P
lan a
fter
inco
rpo
rati
on
of
all
app
lica
ble
Sta
nd
ard C
on
dit
ion
s o
f A
pp
roval
?
6. W
ou
ld t
he
pro
ject
exp
ose
per
son
s to
or
gen
erat
e n
ois
e le
vel
s in
exce
ss o
f
app
lica
ble
sta
nd
ard
s es
tab
lish
ed b
y a
regu
lato
ry a
gen
cy (
e.g.,
occ
up
atio
nal
no
ise
stan
dar
ds
of
OS
HA
)?
See
ab
ov
e fo
r S
CA
NO
I-5
7. W
ou
ld t
he
pro
ject
, du
rin
g e
ith
er
pro
ject
con
stru
ctio
n o
r p
roje
ct
op
erat
ion
, ex
po
se p
erso
ns
to o
r
gen
erat
e gro
un
dbo
rne
vib
rati
on t
hat
exce
eds
the
crit
eria
est
abli
shed
by t
he
Fed
eral
Tra
nsi
t A
dm
inis
trat
ion
(FT
A)?
See
ab
ov
e fo
r S
CA
NO
I-1
, S
CA
NO
I-2
, S
CA
NO
I-3
, an
d S
CA
NO
I-6
Pu
bli
c O
utr
each
M
itig
ati
on
PO
-1 (
Sta
keh
old
er R
evie
w o
f A
ir Q
uali
ty a
nd
Tru
ck
ing
Pla
ns)
: T
he
Cit
y o
f O
akla
nd
(“C
ity”)
an
d P
rolo
gis
CC
IG O
akla
nd
Glo
bal
, L
LC
(“D
evel
op
er”)
sh
all
engag
e th
e p
ub
lic
in t
he
dev
elo
pm
ent
of
the
foll
ow
ing p
lan
s re
quir
ed b
y t
he
SC
A/M
MR
P r
elat
ed t
o p
ote
nti
al a
ir q
ual
ity a
nd
tru
ckin
g i
mp
acts
on
th
e su
rro
und
ing a
rea
du
rin
g c
on
stru
ctio
n a
nd
op
erat
ion
of
the
pro
ject
(th
e
“Su
bje
ct P
lan
s”):
• S
CA
AIR
-1 (
Co
nst
ruct
ion M
anag
emen
t P
lan
)
• S
CA
AIR
-2 (
Co
nst
ruct
ion
-Rel
ated
Air
Po
llu
tion
Co
ntr
ols
)
• M
itig
atio
n 4
.3-7
(T
ruck
Man
agem
ent
Pla
n)
• M
itig
atio
n 4
.4-3
b (
Mar
itim
e an
d R
ail-
Rel
ated
Em
issi
on
s R
edu
ctio
n P
lan
)
• M
itig
atio
n 4
.4-4
(T
ruck
Die
sel
Em
issi
on
Red
uct
ion
Pla
n)
• M
itig
atio
n 4
.4-5
(T
ran
spo
rtat
ion
Co
ntr
ol
Mea
sure
s)
• M
itig
atio
n 4
.4-6
(E
ner
gy-C
on
serv
ing F
ixtu
res
and
Des
ign
s)
• M
itig
atio
n 5
.4-1
(D
emo
nst
rati
on
Pro
ject
s)
• S
CA
TR
AN
S-1
(P
arkin
g a
nd
Tra
nsp
ort
atio
n D
eman
d M
anag
emen
t)
• S
CA
TR
AN
S-2
(C
on
stru
ctio
n T
raff
ic a
nd
Par
kin
g)
• M
itig
atio
n 4
.3-1
3 (
Tra
ffic
Co
ntr
ol
Pla
n –
Haz
ard
ou
s M
ater
ials
)
a.
Sta
keh
old
er L
ist.
T
he
Cit
y s
hal
l m
ain
tain
a l
ist
of
the
nam
es a
nd
ele
ctro
nic
mai
l ad
dre
sses
of
the
stak
eho
lder
s th
at h
ave
exp
ress
ed a
n i
nte
rest
in
rec
eivin
g i
nfo
rmat
ion
on
th
e S
ub
ject
Pla
ns
(the
“Sta
keh
old
er L
ist”
).
Th
e S
takeh
old
er L
ist
shal
l in
clu
de
the
reci
pie
nts
of
the
July
3,
20
13
, le
tter
rela
ted
to
th
e C
on
stru
ctio
n M
anag
emen
t P
lan
fo
r th
e P
ub
lic
Imp
rovem
ents
(w
hic
h i
ncl
ud
ed S
CA
On
go
ing;
as s
tate
d
Cit
y
2012
OA
RB
PR
OJE
CT
SC
A/M
MR
P (
RE
VIS
ED
BY
CIT
Y C
OU
NC
IL 7
-16-1
3)
PA
GE
47
En
vir
on
men
tal
Imp
act
S
tan
dard
Co
nd
itio
ns
of
Ap
pro
val/
Mit
igati
on
Mea
sures
Mit
igati
on
Im
ple
men
tati
on
/
Mon
itori
ng
:
Sch
ed
ule
R
esp
on
sib
ilit
y
AIR
-1,
SC
A A
IR-2
, S
CA
TR
AN
S-2
, M
M 4
.3-1
3 a
nd
SC
A 4
.4-6
) an
d s
uch
add
itio
nal
sta
keh
old
ers
that
sub
mit
a w
ritt
en r
equ
est
to t
he
Cit
y t
o b
e ad
ded
to
th
e S
takeh
old
er L
ist.
b. Q
uar
terl
y M
eeti
ngs.
B
egin
nin
g i
n S
epte
mb
er o
f 2
013
and
co
nti
nuin
g u
nti
l su
ch t
ime
as t
he
Cit
y
Ad
min
istr
ato
r h
as a
pp
roved
all
of
the
Su
bje
ct P
lan
s, t
he
Cit
y a
nd
th
e D
evel
op
er s
hal
l jo
intl
y h
ost
qu
arte
rly m
eeti
ngs
to d
iscu
ss t
he
stat
us
of
the
Sub
ject
Pla
ns.
T
he
Cit
y a
nd
th
e D
evel
op
er s
hal
l m
ake
a go
od
fai
th e
ffo
rt t
o s
ched
ule
the
mee
tin
gs
at a
day
/tim
e to
max
imiz
e S
takeh
old
er a
tten
dan
ce.
The
mee
tin
gs
shal
l b
e n
oti
ced
via
ele
ctro
nic
mai
l to
all
par
ties
in
clu
ded
in
th
e S
takeh
old
er L
ist
pro
vid
ing
at l
east
ten
(10
) ca
len
dar
day
s’ p
rio
r no
tice
of
the
tim
e an
d p
lace
of
the
mee
tin
g.
c.
No
tice
of
Pla
n R
evie
w.
Th
e p
arty
res
po
nsi
ble
fo
r th
e p
rep
arat
ion
and
im
ple
men
tati
on
of
the
app
lica
ble
Su
bje
ct P
lan
sh
all
pro
vid
e at
lea
st f
ort
y f
ive
(45
) ca
len
dar
day
s’ p
rio
r n
oti
ce o
f th
e d
ate
that
a d
raft
of
the
app
lica
ble
Su
bje
ct P
lan
sh
all
be
avai
lab
le f
or
revie
w p
urs
uan
t to
Ite
m (
d)
bel
ow
.
Su
ch n
oti
ce s
hal
l b
e d
eliv
ered
via
ele
ctro
nic
mai
l to
th
e p
arti
es i
ncl
ud
ed i
n t
he
Sta
keh
old
er L
ist.
Th
e n
oti
ce s
hal
l in
clu
de
an e
xp
ress
ref
eren
ce t
o t
he
spec
ific
SC
A/M
MR
P r
equ
irin
g t
he
appli
cab
le
Su
bje
ct P
lan.
T
he
req
uir
emen
t se
t fo
rth
in
th
is
item
(c
) sh
all
no
t ap
ply
to
th
e C
on
stru
ctio
n
Man
agem
ent
Pla
n f
or
the
Pu
bli
c Im
pro
vem
ents
(w
hic
h i
ncl
ud
ed S
CA
AIR
-1,
SC
A A
IR-2
, S
CA
TR
AN
S-2
, M
M 4
.3-1
3 a
nd
SC
A 4
.4-6
) b
ecau
se s
aid
pla
ns
wer
e re
leas
ed o
n J
uly
3,
20
13
. H
ow
ever
,
the
sub
seq
uen
t d
evel
op
men
t o
f p
lan
s p
urs
uan
t to
SC
A A
IR-1
, S
CA
AIR
-2,
SC
A T
RA
NS
-2,
MM
4.3
-13 a
nd
SC
A 4
.4-6
wit
h r
esp
ect
to v
erti
cal
imp
rovem
ents
wil
l b
e su
bje
ct t
o t
his
ite
m (
c).
d. P
ub
lic
Rev
iew
an
d C
om
men
t P
erio
d.
Pri
or
to a
pp
rovin
g a
ny d
raft
Su
bje
ct P
lan
, th
e C
ity s
hal
l
pro
vid
e th
e p
arti
es i
ncl
ud
ed i
n t
he
Sta
keh
old
er L
ist
wit
h s
even
teen
(1
7)
cale
nd
ar d
ays
wit
hin
wh
ich
to r
evie
w a
nd
pro
vid
e w
ritt
en c
om
men
ts t
o a
ny d
raft
Su
bje
ct P
lan,
and
su
ch w
ritt
en c
om
men
ts m
ust
be
rece
ived
by t
he
Cit
y n
o l
ater
th
an 5
:00
p.m
. o
n t
he
sev
ente
enth
day
; p
rovid
ed,
ho
wev
er,
if t
he
seven
teen
(1
7)
day
per
iod
exp
ires
on
an
y d
ay o
ther
a b
usi
nes
s d
ay,
the
exp
irat
ion
dat
e sh
all
be
exte
nd
ed t
o 5
:00
p.m
. o
n t
he
nex
t b
usi
nes
s d
ay.
Th
e se
ven
teen
(1
7)
day
per
iod
sh
all
be
init
iate
d b
y
the
Cit
y’s
ele
ctro
nic
mai
l to
th
e p
arti
es i
ncl
ud
ed i
n t
he
Sta
keh
old
er L
ist.
D
uri
ng t
he
17
-day
pu
bli
c
revie
w a
nd
co
mm
ent
per
iod
th
e C
ity s
hal
l m
ake
the
dra
ft S
ub
ject
Pla
n a
vai
lab
le f
or
pu
bli
c re
vie
w
such
as
po
stin
g t
he
do
cum
ent
on
th
e C
ity’s
web
site
.
e.
Info
rmat
ion
al
Co
un
cil
Pre
sen
tati
on
.
Cit
y
staf
f sh
all
pro
vid
e th
e C
ity
Co
un
cil
wit
h
an
info
rmat
ion
al p
rese
nta
tio
n o
f ea
ch a
pp
roved
Sub
ject
Pla
n w
ith
in n
inet
y (
90
) ca
len
dar
day
s af
ter
the
Cit
y A
dm
inis
trat
or’
s ap
pro
val
of
such
Sub
ject
Pla
n.
Su
ch p
rese
nta
tio
n s
hal
l in
clu
de
a su
mm
ary o
f
the
pu
bli
c o
utr
each
im
ple
men
ted
pu
rsu
ant
to t
his
mit
igat
ion
mea
sure
an
d t
he
req
uir
emen
ts a
nd
go
als
of
the
app
lica
ble
ap
pro
ved
Sub
ject
Pla
n.
Pu
bli
c S
ervic
es
1.
Wo
uld
th
e p
roje
ct r
esu
lt i
n i
ncr
ease
d
dem
and
fo
r fi
re p
rote
ctio
n s
ervic
es
and
fir
st r
esp
ond
er m
edic
al
emer
gen
cy s
ervic
es?
SC
A P
SU
-1:
Un
der
grou
nd
U
tili
ties
: T
he
pro
ject
ap
pli
can
t sh
all
sub
mit
p
lan
s fo
r re
vie
w an
d
app
roval
b
y th
e B
uil
din
g S
ervic
es D
ivis
ion
an
d th
e P
ub
lic
Wo
rks
Ag
ency
, an
d o
ther
re
levan
t
agen
cies
as
app
rop
riat
e th
at s
how
all
fir
e al
arm
co
nd
uit
s an
d s
imil
ar f
acil
itie
s p
lace
d u
nd
ergro
un
d.
Th
e n
ew f
acil
itie
s sh
all
be
pla
ced u
nd
ergro
un
d a
lon
g t
he
pro
ject
app
lica
nt’
s st
reet
fro
nta
ge
and f
rom
the
pro
ject
app
lica
nt’
s st
ruct
ure
s to
th
e po
int
of
serv
ice.
Th
e p
lan
s sh
all
sho
w a
ll f
ire
wat
er s
ervic
e
and
fir
e al
arm
fac
ilit
ies
inst
alle
d i
n a
cco
rdan
ce w
ith
sta
nd
ard
sp
ecif
icat
ion
s o
f th
e se
rvin
g u
tili
ties
.
Pri
or
to i
ssu
ance
of
a b
uil
din
g p
erm
it.
Cit
y/P
ort
PA
GE
50
2012
OA
RB
PR
OJE
CT
SC
A/M
MR
P (
RE
VIS
ED
BY
CIT
Y C
OU
NC
IL 7
-16-1
3)
En
vir
on
men
tal
Imp
act
S
tan
dard
Co
nd
itio
ns
of
Ap
pro
val/
Mit
igati
on
Mea
sures
Mit
igati
on
Im
ple
men
tati
on
/
Mon
itori
ng
:
Sch
ed
ule
R
esp
on
sib
ilit
y
for
the
PM
pea
k h
ou
r.
• C
oo
rdin
ate
the
sign
al t
imin
g c
han
ges
at
this
in
ters
ecti
on w
ith
th
e ad
jace
nt
inte
rsec
tio
ns
that
are
in t
he
sam
e si
gn
al c
oo
rdin
atio
n g
rou
p.
2. A
t tw
o i
nte
rsec
tio
ns,
th
e pro
ject
wo
uld
cau
se (
a) t
he
tota
l in
ters
ecti
on
aver
age
veh
icle
del
ay t
o i
ncr
ease
by
two
(2
) o
r m
ore
sec
on
ds,
or
(b)
an
incr
ease
in
aver
age
del
ay f
or
any o
f
the
crit
ical
m
ovem
ents
of
fou
r (4
)
seco
nd
s o
r m
ore
; o
r (c
) t
he
vo
lum
e-
to-c
apac
ity (
“V/C
”) r
atio
exce
eds
0.0
3 o
r m
ore
(b
ut
on
ly i
f th
e d
elay
val
ues
are
gre
ater
th
an 1
20
sec
ond
s o
f
aver
age
inte
rsec
tio
n d
elay
as
del
ay
val
ues
over
12
0 s
econ
ds
tend
to
incr
ease
exp
on
enti
ally
an
d a
re t
hen
gen
eral
ly c
on
sid
ered
un
reli
able
).
Mit
igati
on
Mea
sure
3.1
6-3
: 7
th S
tree
t &
Ha
rris
on
Str
eet
(#1
8).
T
o i
mp
lem
ent
this
mea
sure
, th
e
pro
ject
spo
nso
r sh
all
sub
mit
pla
ns
spec
ific
atio
ns
and
est
imat
es (
PS
&E
) as
det
aile
d i
n M
itig
atio
n
Mea
sure
3.1
6-1
th
at a
re c
on
sist
ent
wit
h t
he
Cit
y’s
sta
nd
ard
s to
Cit
y o
f O
akla
nd
’s T
ran
spo
rtat
ion
En
gin
eeri
ng D
ivis
ion f
or
revie
w a
nd
app
roval
.
• O
pti
miz
e si
gn
al t
imin
g (
i.e.
, ad
just
th
e al
loca
tio
n o
f gre
en t
ime
for
each
in
ters
ecti
on a
pp
roac
h)
for
the
PM
pea
k h
ou
r.
• C
oo
rdin
ate
the
sign
al t
imin
g c
han
ges
at
this
in
ters
ecti
on w
ith
th
e ad
jace
nt
inte
rsec
tio
ns
that
are
in t
he
sam
e si
gn
al c
oo
rdin
atio
n g
rou
p.
Th
e p
roje
ct s
pon
sor
shal
l fu
nd
, p
rep
are,
an
d i
nst
all
the
app
roved
pla
ns
and
im
pro
vem
ents
.
At
issu
ance
of
firs
t
Cer
tifi
cate
of
Occ
up
ancy
(C
O)
Cit
y/P
ort
Mit
igati
on
Mea
sure
3.1
6-4
: 12
th S
tree
t &
Ca
stro
Str
eet
(#2
9).
To
im
ple
men
t th
is m
easu
re,
the
pro
ject
spo
nso
r sh
all
sub
mit
pla
ns
spec
ific
atio
ns
and
est
imat
es (
PS
&E
) as
det
aile
d i
n M
itig
atio
n
Mea
sure
3.1
6-1
th
at a
re c
on
sist
ent
wit
h t
he
Cit
y’s
sta
nd
ard
s to
Cit
y o
f O
akla
nd
’s T
ran
spo
rtat
ion
En
gin
eeri
ng D
ivis
ion f
or
revie
w a
nd
app
roval
.
• O
pti
miz
e si
gn
al t
imin
g (
i.e.
, ad
just
th
e al
loca
tio
n o
f gre
en t
ime
for
each
in
ters
ecti
on a
pp
roac
h)
for
the
PM
pea
k h
ou
r.
• C
oo
rdin
ate
the
sign
al t
imin
g c
han
ges
at
this
in
ters
ecti
on w
ith
th
e ad
jace
nt
inte
rsec
tio
ns
that
are
in t
he
sam
e si
gn
al c
oo
rdin
atio
n g
rou
p.
Th
e p
roje
ct s
pon
sor
shal
l fu
nd
, p
rep
are,
an
d i
nst
all
the
app
roved
pla
ns
and
im
pro
vem
ents
.
At
issu
ance
of
firs
t
Cer
tifi
cate
of
Occ
up
ancy
(C
O)
Cit
y/P
ort
3. R
edev
elo
pm
ent
wo
uld
ca
use
so
me
road
way
seg
men
ts o
n t
he
Con
ges
tio
n
Man
agem
ent
Pro
gra
m
(CM
P)
to
a)
deg
rad
e to
LO
S F
; o
r b
) in
crea
se t
he
V/C
rat
io b
y m
ore
th
an t
hre
e p
erce
nt
for
a ro
adw
ay
seg
men
t th
at
wo
uld
op
erat
e at
LO
S F
wit
ho
ut
the
pro
ject
.
SC
A T
RA
NS
-1:
Park
ing
an
d T
ran
sport
ati
on
Dem
an
d M
an
ag
em
en
t:
Th
e p
roje
ct s
pon
sor
shal
l
pay
fo
r an
d s
ub
mit
fo
r re
vie
w a
nd
ap
pro
val
by t
he
Cit
y a
Tra
nsp
ort
atio
n D
eman
d M
anag
emen
t
(TD
M)
pla
n c
onta
inin
g s
trat
egie
s to
:
1.
Red
uce
th
e am
ou
nt
of
traf
fic
gen
erat
ed b
y n
ew d
evel
op
men
t an
d t
he
exp
ansi
on
of
exis
tin
g
dev
elo
pm
ent,
pu
rsu
ant
to t
he
Cit
y’s
po
lice
po
wer
an
d n
eces
sary
in
ord
er t
o p
rote
ct t
he
pu
bli
c
hea
lth
, sa
fety
an
d w
elfa
re.
2.
En
sure
th
at e
xp
ecte
d i
ncr
ease
s in
tra
ffic
res
ult
ing f
rom
gro
wth
in
em
plo
ym
ent
and
ho
usi
ng
op
po
rtu
nit
ies
in t
he
Cit
y o
f O
akla
nd
wil
l b
e ad
equ
atel
y m
itig
ated
.
3.
Red
uce
dri
ve-
alo
ne
com
mu
te t
rip
s d
uri
ng p
eak t
raff
ic p
erio
ds
by u
sin
g a
co
mb
inat
ion
of
serv
ices
, in
cen
tives
, an
d f
acil
itie
s.
4.
Pro
mo
te m
ore
eff
icie
nt
use
of
exis
tin
g t
ran
spo
rtat
ion
fac
ilit
ies
and
en
sure
th
at n
ew
dev
elo
pm
ents
are
des
ign
ed i
n w
ays
to m
axim
ize
the
po
ten
tial
fo
r al
tern
ativ
e tr
ansp
ort
atio
n
usa
ge.
Fo
r co
nst
ruct
ion
:
Pri
or
to i
ssu
ance
of
firs
t p
erm
it r
elat
ed
to c
on
stru
ctio
n (
e.g.,
dem
oli
tio
n,
gra
din
g,
etc.
)
Fo
r o
per
atio
n:
Pri
or
to i
ssu
ance
of
a fi
nal
bu
ild
ing p
erm
it a
nd
on
-go
ing r
elat
ed t
o
sub
mis
sio
n o
f
Par
kin
g a
nd
TD
M
Pla
n a
nn
ual
com
pli
ance
rep
ort
Cit
y/P
ort
2012
OA
RB
PR
OJE
CT
SC
A/M
MR
P (
RE
VIS
ED
BY
CIT
Y C
OU
NC
IL 7
-16-1
3)
PA
GE
51
En
vir
on
men
tal
Imp
act
S
tan
dard
Co
nd
itio
ns
of
Ap
pro
val/
Mit
igati
on
Mea
sures
Mit
igati
on
Im
ple
men
tati
on
/
Mon
itori
ng
:
Sch
ed
ule
R
esp
on
sib
ilit
y
5.
Est
abli
sh a
n o
ngo
ing m
on
ito
rin
g a
nd
en
forc
emen
t p
rogra
m t
o e
nsu
re t
hat
th
e d
esir
ed
alte
rnat
ive
mo
de
use
per
cen
tages
are
ach
ieved
.
Th
e p
roje
ct s
pon
sor
shal
l im
ple
men
t th
e ap
pro
ved
TD
M p
lan
. T
he
TD
M p
lan
sh
all
incl
ud
e st
rate
gie
s
to i
ncr
ease
ped
estr
ian
, bic
ycl
e, t
ran
sit,
an
d c
arpo
ol/
van
poo
l u
se.
All
fo
ur
mo
des
of
trav
el s
hal
l b
e
con
sid
ered
, an
d p
arkin
g m
anag
emen
t an
d p
arkin
g r
edu
ctio
n s
trat
egie
s sh
ou
ld b
e in
clud
ed.
Act
ion
s to
con
sid
er i
ncl
ud
e th
e fo
llo
win
g:
a)
Incl
usi
on
of
add
itio
nal
lon
g t
erm
an
d s
ho
rt t
erm
bic
ycl
e p
arkin
g t
hat
mee
ts t
he
des
ign
sta
nd
ard
s
set
fort
h i
n c
hap
ter
five
of
the
Bic
ycl
e M
aste
r P
lan
, an
d B
icycl
e P
arkin
g O
rdin
ance
, an
d s
ho
wer
and
lo
cker
fac
ilit
ies
in c
om
mer
cial
dev
elo
pm
ents
th
at e
xce
ed t
he
req
uir
emen
t.
b)
Co
nst
ruct
ion
of
and
/or
acce
ss t
o b
ikew
ays
per
th
e B
icycl
e M
aste
r P
lan
; co
nst
ruct
ion
of
pri
ori
ty
bik
eway
s, o
nsi
te s
ign
age
and
bik
e la
ne
stri
pin
g.
c)
Inst
alla
tion
of
safe
ty e
lem
ents
per
th
e P
edes
tria
n M
aste
r P
lan
(su
ch a
s cr
oss
wal
k s
trip
ing,
curb
ram
ps,
co
unt
do
wn
si
gn
als,
b
ulb
ou
ts,
etc.
) to
en
cou
rage
con
ven
ien
t an
d sa
fe cr
oss
ing at
arte
rial
s.
d)
Inst
alla
tion
o
f am
enit
ies
such
as
li
gh
tin
g,
stre
et tr
ees,
tr
ash
re
cep
tacl
es p
er th
e P
edes
tria
n
Mas
ter
Pla
n a
nd
an
y a
pp
lica
ble
str
eets
cap
e p
lan
.
e)
Co
nst
ruct
ion
and
dev
elo
pm
ent
of
tran
sit
sto
ps/
shel
ters
, p
edes
tria
n a
cces
s, w
ay f
ind
ing s
ign
age,
and
lig
hti
ng a
rou
nd
tra
nsi
t st
op
s per
tra
nsi
t ag
ency
pla
ns
or
neg
oti
ated
im
pro
vem
ents
.
f)
Dir
ect
on
site
sal
es o
f tr
ansi
t p
asse
s p
urc
has
ed a
nd
so
ld a
t a
bu
lk g
roup
rat
e (t
hro
ugh
pro
gra
ms
such
as
AC
Tra
nsi
t E
asy P
ass
or
a si
mil
ar p
rogra
m t
hro
ugh
ano
ther
tra
nsi
t ag
ency
).
g)
Em
plo
yee
s o
r re
sid
ents
can
be
pro
vid
ed w
ith
a s
ub
sid
y,
det
erm
ined
by t
he
pro
ject
sp
on
sor
and
sub
ject
to
rev
iew
by t
he
Cit
y,
if t
he
emp
loyee
s o
r re
sid
ents
use
tra
nsi
t o
r co
mm
ute
by o
ther
alte
rnat
ive
mo
des
.
h)
Pro
vis
ion o
f o
ngo
ing c
on
trib
uti
on
to
AC
Tra
nsi
t se
rvic
e to
th
e ar
ea b
etw
een
th
e d
evel
op
men
t
and
nea
rest
mas
s tr
ansi
t st
atio
n.
If t
hat
is
no
t av
aila
ble
, an
on
go
ing c
on
trib
uti
on t
o a
n e
xis
tin
g
area
sh
utt
le s
ervic
e b
etw
een
th
e d
evel
op
men
t an
d n
eare
st m
ass
tran
sit
stat
ion
. T
he
last
op
tio
n i
s
esta
bli
shm
ent
of
a n
ew s
hu
ttle
ser
vic
e b
etw
een
th
e d
evel
op
men
t an
d n
eare
st m
ass
tran
sit
stat
ion
may
be
dev
elo
ped
. T
he
con
trib
uti
on
req
uir
ed f
or
the
serv
ice
(an
y o
pti
on
) w
ill
be
bas
ed o
n t
he
cost
of
the
last
op
tio
n.
i)
Gu
aran
teed
ri
de
ho
me
pro
gra
m fo
r em
plo
yee
s, ei
ther
th
rou
gh
5
11.o
rg o
r th
rou
gh
se
par
ate
pro
gra
m.
j)
Pre
-tax
co
mm
ute
r b
enef
its
(co
mm
ute
r ch
ecks)
fo
r em
plo
yee
s.
k)
Fre
e d
esig
nat
ed p
arkin
g s
pac
es f
or
on
-sit
e ca
r-sh
arin
g p
rogra
m (
such
as
Cit
y C
ar S
har
e, Z
ip
Car
, et
c.)
and
/or
car-
shar
e m
emb
ersh
ip f
or
emp
loyee
s o
r te
nan
ts.
l)
On
-sit
e ca
rpo
oli
ng
and
/or
van
po
ol
pro
gra
m
that
in
clu
des
p
refe
ren
tial
(d
isco
unte
d
or
free
)
par
kin
g f
or
carp
oo
ls a
nd
van
po
ols
.
m)
Dis
trib
uti
on o
f in
form
atio
n c
on
cern
ing a
lter
nat
ive
tran
spo
rtat
ion
opti
on
s.
PA
GE
52
2012
OA
RB
PR
OJE
CT
SC
A/M
MR
P (
RE
VIS
ED
BY
CIT
Y C
OU
NC
IL 7
-16-1
3)
En
vir
on
men
tal
Imp
act
S
tan
dard
Co
nd
itio
ns
of
Ap
pro
val/
Mit
igati
on
Mea
sures
Mit
igati
on
Im
ple
men
tati
on
/
Mon
itori
ng
:
Sch
ed
ule
R
esp
on
sib
ilit
y
n)
P
arkin
g s
pac
es s
old
/lea
sed
sep
arat
ely f
or
resi
den
tial
un
its.
Ch
arge
emp
loyee
s fo
r p
arkin
g,
or
pro
vid
e a
cash
in
cen
tive
or
tran
sit
pas
s al
tern
ativ
e to
a
free
p
arkin
g sp
ace
in co
mm
erci
al
pro
per
ties
.
o)
P
arkin
g m
anag
emen
t st
rate
gie
s; i
ncl
udin
g a
tten
dan
t/val
et p
arkin
g a
nd
sh
ared
par
kin
g s
pac
es.
p)
R
equ
irin
g t
enan
ts t
o p
rovid
e o
ppo
rtun
itie
s an
d t
he
abil
ity t
o w
ork
off
-sit
e.
q)
All
ow
em
plo
yee
s o
r re
sid
ents
to
ad
just
th
eir
wo
rk s
ched
ule
in
ord
er t
o c
om
ple
te t
he
bas
ic w
ork
req
uir
emen
t o
f fi
ve
eigh
t-h
ou
r w
ork
day
s b
y a
dju
stin
g t
hei
r sc
hed
ule
to
red
uce
veh
icle
tri
ps
to
the
wo
rksi
te.
r)
Pro
vid
e o
r re
qu
ire
ten
ants
to
pro
vid
e em
plo
yee
s w
ith
sta
gg
ered
wo
rk h
ou
rs i
nvolv
ing a
sh
ift
in
the
set
wo
rk
ho
urs
o
f al
l em
plo
yee
s at
th
e w
ork
pla
ce
or
flex
ible
w
ork
h
ou
rs
invo
lvin
g
ind
ivid
ual
ly d
eter
min
ed w
ork
ho
urs
.
Th
e p
roje
ct s
po
nso
r sh
all
sub
mit
an
an
nu
al c
om
pli
ance
rep
ort
fo
r re
vie
w a
nd
ap
pro
val
by t
he
Cit
y.
Th
is r
epo
rt w
ill
be
revie
wed
eit
her
by C
ity s
taff
(o
r a
pee
r re
vie
w c
on
sult
ant,
ch
ose
n b
y t
he
Cit
y a
nd
pai
d f
or
by t
he
pro
ject
sp
on
sor)
. I
f ti
mel
y r
epo
rts
are
no
t su
bm
itte
d,
the
rep
ort
s in
dic
ate
a fa
ilu
re t
o
ach
ieve
the
stat
ed p
oli
cy g
oal
s, o
r th
e re
qu
ired
alt
ern
ativ
e m
od
e sp
lit
is s
till
not
ach
ieved
, st
aff
wil
l
wo
rk w
ith
th
e p
roje
ct s
po
nso
r to
fin
d w
ays
to m
eet
thei
r co
mm
itm
ents
an
d a
chie
ve
trip
red
uct
ion
go
als.
If
th
e is
sues
can
no
t b
e re
solv
ed,
the
mat
ter
may
be
refe
rred
to
th
e P
lann
ing C
om
mis
sio
n f
or
reso
luti
on
. P
roje
ct s
pon
sors
sh
all
be
requ
ired
, as
a c
ond
itio
n o
f ap
pro
val
, to
rei
mb
urs
e th
e C
ity f
or
cost
s in
curr
ed i
n m
ain
tain
ing a
nd
en
forc
ing t
he
trip
red
uct
ion p
rogra
m f
or
the
app
roved
pro
ject
.
4. T
he
pro
ject
w
ou
ld
dir
ectl
y
or
ind
irec
tly
cau
se
or
exp
ose
ro
adw
ay
use
rs t
o a
per
man
ent
and
sub
stan
tial
tran
spo
rtat
ion
haz
ard
du
e to
a n
ew o
r
exis
tin
g
ph
ysi
cal
des
ign
fe
atu
re
or
inco
mp
atib
le u
ses?
Mit
igati
on
4.3
-5:
Red
evel
op
men
t el
emen
ts s
hal
l b
e d
esig
ned
in a
cco
rdan
ce w
ith
sta
nd
ard
des
ign
pra
ctic
e an
d s
hal
l b
e su
bje
ct t
o r
evie
w a
nd
ap
pro
val
of
the
Cit
y o
r P
ort
des
ign
en
gin
eer.
Th
rou
gh
des
ign
rev
iew
, th
e C
ity a
nd
/or
Po
rt,
as a
pp
lica
ble
, sh
all
ensu
re t
he
des
ign
of
road
way
s,
bic
ycl
e an
d p
edes
tria
n f
acil
itie
s, p
arkin
g l
ots
, an
d o
ther
tra
nsp
ort
atio
n f
eatu
res
com
ply
wit
h d
esig
n
stan
dar
ds
and
dis
allo
w d
esig
n p
rop
osa
ls t
hat
lik
ely t
o r
esu
lt i
n t
raff
ic h
azar
ds.
An
y m
itig
atio
n o
r
red
evel
op
men
t fe
atu
res
that
may
dir
ectl
y a
ffec
t C
altr
ans
faci
liti
es s
hal
l b
e su
bm
itte
d f
or
revie
w b
y
that
agen
cy.
Pri
or
to a
pp
roval
of
PU
D.
Cit
y/P
ort
Mit
igati
on
4.3
-7:
Th
e C
ity a
nd
th
e P
ort
sh
all
conti
nu
e an
d s
hal
l w
ork
to
get
her
to
cre
ate
a tr
uck
man
agem
ent
pla
n d
esig
ned
to r
edu
ce t
he
effe
cts
of
tran
spo
rt t
ruck
s o
n l
oca
l st
reet
s. T
he
Cit
y a
nd
Po
rt s
hal
l fu
nd o
n a
fai
r sh
are
bas
is,
imp
lem
enta
tio
n o
f th
is p
lan.
Th
e tr
uck
man
agem
ent
pla
n m
ay i
ncl
ud
e, a
nd i
s no
t li
mit
ed t
o,
the
foll
ow
ing e
lem
ents
:
•
An
alyze
tru
ck t
raff
ic i
n W
est
Oak
lan
d;
•
Tra
ffic
cal
min
g s
trat
egie
s o
n s
tree
ts n
ot
des
ign
ated
as
tru
ck r
oute
s d
esig
ned
to
dis
cou
rage
tru
ck t
hro
ugh
tra
vel
;
•
Tru
ck d
river
ed
uca
tio
n p
rogra
ms;
•
Exp
and
ed s
ign
age,
in
clu
din
g t
ruck
pro
hib
itio
ns
on s
tree
ts n
ot
des
ign
ated
as
tru
ck r
ou
tes;
•
Tra
ffic
sig
nal
tim
ing i
mp
rovem
ents
;
•
Exp
lore
th
e fe
asib
ilit
y o
f tr
uck
acc
ess
to F
ronta
ge
Ro
ad;
Pri
or
to i
ssu
ance
of
a fi
nal
bu
ild
ing
per
mit
Cit
y/P
ort
2012
OA
RB
PR
OJE
CT
SC
A/M
MR
P (
RE
VIS
ED
BY
CIT
Y C
OU
NC
IL 7
-16-1
3)
PA
GE
57
En
vir
on
men
tal
Imp
act
S
tan
dard
Co
nd
itio
ns
of
Ap
pro
val/
Mit
igati
on
Mea
sures
Mit
igati
on
Im
ple
men
tati
on
/
Mon
itori
ng
:
Sch
ed
ule
R
esp
on
sib
ilit
y
9. W
ou
ld
the
pro
ject
re
sult
in
a
sub
stan
tial
, th
ou
gh
tem
po
rary
,
adver
se
effe
ct
on
th
e ci
rcu
lati
on
syst
em
du
rin
g
con
stru
ctio
n
of
the
pro
ject
.
SC
A
TR
AN
S-2
: C
on
stru
ctio
n
Tra
ffic
a
nd
P
ark
ing
:
Th
e p
roje
ct
spo
nso
r an
d
con
stru
ctio
n
con
trac
tor
shal
l m
eet
wit
h a
pp
rop
riat
e C
ity o
f O
akla
nd
agen
cies
to
det
erm
ine
traf
fic
man
agem
ent
stra
tegie
s to
red
uce
, to
th
e m
axim
um
exte
nt
feas
ible
, tr
affi
c co
nges
tio
n a
nd
th
e ef
fect
s o
f p
arkin
g
dem
and
b
y co
nst
ruct
ion
w
ork
ers
du
rin
g co
nst
ruct
ion o
f th
is p
roje
ct (s
ee al
so S
CA
T
RA
NS
-1,
esp
ecia
lly “h
”) a
nd
oth
er n
earb
y p
roje
cts
that
co
uld
be
sim
ult
aneo
usl
y u
nd
er c
on
stru
ctio
n.
Th
e
pro
ject
sp
on
sor
shal
l d
evel
op
a
con
stru
ctio
n m
anag
emen
t p
lan
. T
he
pla
n sh
all
be
sub
mit
ted
to
EB
MU
D,
the
Po
rt,
and
Cal
tran
s fo
r th
eir
revie
w
and
co
mm
ent
ten
(1
0)
bu
sin
ess
day
s b
efo
re
sub
mit
tal
to t
he
Cit
y.
Th
e p
roje
ct s
po
nso
r sh
all
con
sid
er i
n g
ood
fai
th s
uch
co
mm
ents
an
d r
evis
e th
e
pla
n a
s ap
pro
pri
ate.
Th
e re
vis
ed p
lan
sh
all
be
sub
mit
ted
fo
r re
vie
w a
nd
ap
pro
val
by t
he
Cit
y’s
Pla
nn
ing a
nd
Zo
nin
g D
ivis
ion
, th
e B
uil
din
g S
ervic
es D
ivis
ion
, an
d t
he
Tra
nsp
ort
atio
n S
ervic
es
Div
isio
n.
Th
e p
lan
sh
all
incl
ud
e at
lea
st t
he
foll
ow
ing i
tem
s an
d r
equ
irem
ents
:
a)
A s
et o
f co
mp
reh
ensi
ve
traf
fic
con
tro
l m
easu
res,
in
clu
din
g s
ched
uli
ng o
f m
ajo
r tr
uck
tri
ps
and
del
iver
ies
to a
vo
id p
eak t
raff
ic h
ou
rs,
det
ou
r si
gn
s if
req
uir
ed,
lan
e cl
osu
re p
roce
du
res,
sig
ns,
con
es f
or
dri
ver
s, a
nd
des
ign
ated
co
nst
ruct
ion
acc
ess
rou
tes.
b)
No
tifi
cati
on
pro
cedu
res
for
adja
cen
t p
roje
ct s
po
nso
rs a
nd
pub
lic
safe
ty p
erso
nn
el r
egar
din
g
wh
en m
ajo
r d
eliv
erie
s, d
eto
urs
, an
d l
ane
clo
sure
s w
ill
occ
ur.
c)
Lo
cati
on
of
con
stru
ctio
n s
tagin
g a
reas
fo
r m
ater
ials
, eq
uip
men
t, a
nd
veh
icle
s at
an
app
roved
loca
tio
n.
d)
A
pro
cess
fo
r re
spo
nd
ing
to,
and
tr
ackin
g,
com
pla
ints
p
erta
inin
g
to
con
stru
ctio
n
acti
vit
y,
incl
ud
ing i
den
tifi
cati
on
of
an o
nsi
te c
om
pla
int
man
ager
. T
he
man
ager
sh
all
det
erm
ine
the
cau
se
of
the
com
pla
ints
an
d s
hal
l ta
ke
pro
mp
t ac
tion
to
co
rrec
t th
e p
rob
lem
. P
lan
nin
g a
nd Z
on
ing
shal
l b
e in
form
ed w
ho
th
e M
anag
er is
p
rio
r to
th
e is
suan
ce of
the
firs
t p
erm
it is
sued
b
y
Bu
ild
ing S
ervic
es.
e)
Pro
vis
ion f
or
acco
mm
od
atio
n o
f p
edes
tria
n f
low
.
f)
Pro
vis
ion
fo
r p
arkin
g m
anag
emen
t an
d sp
aces
fo
r al
l co
nst
ruct
ion
w
ork
ers
to en
sure
th
at
con
stru
ctio
n w
ork
ers
do
not
par
k i
n o
n-s
tree
t sp
aces
(se
e al
so S
CA
TR
AN
S-1
, es
pec
iall
y “
h”)
.
g)
An
y d
amag
e to
th
e st
reet
cau
sed
by h
eav
y e
qu
ipm
ent,
or
as a
res
ult
of
this
co
nst
ruct
ion
, sh
all
be
rep
aire
d,
at t
he
app
lica
nt's
ex
pen
se,
wit
hin
on
e w
eek o
f th
e occ
urr
ence
of
the
dam
age
(or
exce
ssiv
e w
ear)
, u
nle
ss f
urt
her
dam
age/
exce
ssiv
e w
ear
may
co
nti
nu
e; i
n s
uch
cas
e, r
epai
r sh
all
occ
ur
pri
or
to i
ssu
ance
of
a fi
nal
in
spec
tion
of
the
bu
ild
ing p
erm
it.
All
dam
age
that
is
a th
reat
to
pu
bli
c h
ealt
h
or
safe
ty
shal
l b
e re
pai
red
im
med
iate
ly.
Th
e st
reet
sh
all
be
rest
ore
d
to
its
con
dit
ion
pri
or
to t
he
new
co
nst
ruct
ion
as
esta
bli
shed
by t
he
Cit
y B
uil
din
g I
nsp
ecto
r an
d/o
r
ph
oto
do
cum
enta
tio
n,
at
the
app
lica
nt's
ex
pen
se,
bef
ore
th
e is
suan
ce
of
a C
erti
fica
te
of
Occ
up
ancy
.
h)
An
y h
eav
y e
qu
ipm
ent
bro
ugh
t to
th
e co
nst
ruct
ion s
ite
shal
l b
e tr
ansp
ort
ed b
y t
ruck
, w
her
e
feas
ible
.
i)
No
mat
eria
ls o
r eq
uip
men
t sh
all
be
sto
red
on
th
e tr
avel
ed r
oad
way
at
any t
ime.
j)
Pri
or
to c
on
stru
ctio
n,
a po
rtab
le t
oil
et f
acil
ity a
nd
a d
ebri
s bo
x s
hal
l b
e in
stal
led o
n t
he
site
, an
d
pro
per
ly m
ain
tain
ed t
hro
ugh
pro
ject
co
mp
leti
on
.
Pri
or
to t
he
issu
ance
of
a d
emo
liti
on
,
gra
din
g o
r bu
ild
ing
per
mit
Cit
y/P
ort
B
Appendix B - LEED Lease Addendum
Tenant Lease Agreement Language
for inclusion in standard Prologis lease
February 23, 2017
Oakland Global Logistics Center Building 1
Oakland, California
Oakland Global Logistics Center Building 1 Tenant Lease Agreement Language Page 1
In order to fulfill this project’s LEED Volume Program requirements, tenants will be responsible for meeting certain criteria for the LEED credits as described in this section. The criteria listed below are required of all tenants during the initial build-out of spaces within the core and shell building. Alternative Transportation: Bicycle Storage & Changing Rooms (SS Credit 4.2) Shower and Changing Room Facilities. In order to accommodate employees and other occupants who choose to ride their bicycles to the site, tenant will provide at least 0.002 shower and changing facilities per 1,000 SF of total building area within the building. For multi-tenant buildings, the initial build-out of the building must, as a whole, include at least 0.002 shower and changing facilities per 1,000 SF of total building area within the building. Water Use Reduction: 20% Reduction (WE Prerequisite 1) Water Use Reduction: 30% Reduction (WE Credit 3) To maximize water efficiency and reduce potable water use by a minimum of 30% within the building, plumbing fixtures installed by tenants in the initial fit-out of the building will be required to utilize flush and flow rates no greater than:
Water Closets: Maximum of 1.28 gallons per flush
Urinals: Maximum of 0.125 gallons per flush
Lavatory faucet: Maximum 0.5 gallons per minute flow rate
Showerhead: Maximum 1.5 gallons per minute flow rate
Kitchen sink faucets: Maximum of 1.5 gallons per minute flow rate
Minimum Energy Performance (EA Prerequisite 2) Optimize Energy Performance (Energy & Atmosphere Credit 1) The initial fit out of tenant spaces must comply with 2013 California Energy Code, including the provision that warehouse spaces shall utilize no more than 0.6 W/SF of connected lighting power.
Minimum Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) Performance (IEQ Prerequisite 1)
Increased Ventilation (IEQ Credit 2) In the initial fit out, the tenant will install mechanical ventilation systems to meet or exceed the minimum outdoor air ventilation rates as described in the 2013 California Mechanical Code, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality, using the Ventilation Rate Procedure of 10 CFM/person or 0.06 CFM/SF.
Oakland Global Logistics Center Building 1 Tenant Lease Agreement Language Page 2
Low Mercury Lighting (ID Credit) The following standard lighting principles shall be applied in an effort to reduce the mercury in lighting for all initial tenant fit outs:
T5 or LED lighting is required for interior warehouse lighting fixtures
HID lighting is prohibited for any interior lighting fixtures Storage and Collection of Recyclables (MR prerequisite 1) The following requirements must be integrated into any project utilizing the Prologis LEED Volume Program:
1. A recycling storage and collection area must be indicated on a project drawing to demonstrate that adequate space has been made available for future tenant use in a proper location within the building 2. The recycling storage and collection area’s size must follow the guidelines listed below 3. The architect must review, edit (as necessary) and acknowledge the narrative provided below These three requirements are expanded in the following document for review and action by the architect on each volume project.
Guidance on Item #1 On the Site Plan, provide an easily-accessible dedicated area for the collection and storage materials for recycling for the entire building. Clearly indicate this area on the Site Plan and provide to the Prototype Team for review and comment. Guidance on Item #2 Size the dedicated area for the collection and storage materials for recycling for the entire building on the Site Plan per the following minimum sizing guidelines: Total Building Area Minimum Size of Recycling Storage & Collection Area Less than or equal to 200,000 SF 275 SF Greater than 200,000 SF 500 SF
C
Appendix C – PG&E NEM 2.0 Guidelines
Net Energy Metering
The Net Energy Metering (NEM) program allows you to use the electricity you
generate to offset the electricity provided by PG&E at your home or business.
Here’s how the program works:
When you generate your own electricity, your onsite electricity needs will be
served first and any electricity you don’t consume will be exported to the grid.
You’ll receive full credit for electricity exported to the grid based on your rate
schedule. You can use these credits to offset PG&E charges for electricity usage
throughout a 12-month period.
Please review the information in this brochure to learn more about the NEM
program, including electricity pricing and rate schedules; the billing process;
and available payment options. We look forward to continuing to serve you.
Electric Pricing In your interconnection agreement, you selected a rate
schedule. This pricing plan determines the rate at which
you’ll be charged for your net electricity usage and the
rate at which you’ll be credited for your net electricity
generation. Under the NEM Program, you’ll be credited
for any energy your PG&E meter shows you exported to
PG&E’s electric grid in the billing period.
For more information about pricing plans, visit
www.pge.com/tariffs.
Electric Rate Schedules
Residential and Small Commercial Customers Standard Pricing Plan
The basic residential and small commercial rate plans
consist of pricing per kilowatt-hour (kWh) of electricity
that does not vary with the time of day it is used, but may
vary by season.
• Residential (E-1)
• Small Commercial (A-1)
Time-of-Use (TOU) Pricing Plan
Customers have the option of a time-of-use (TOU) plan,
which provides reduced pricing per kWh according to
the season and time of day the energy is used. The TOU
plan is best for those who can control the time of day
when they consume energy and shift usage to off-peak
hours rather than peak hours.
• Residential TOU (E-6)
• Small Commercial TOU (A-6)
Agricultural and Commercial/Industrial Customers
Agricultural or Medium and Large Commercial
Pricing Plan
A variety of rate schedule options are available to meet
the needs of agricultural, commercial and industrial
customers. Plans provide pricing per kWh that varies
by usage; the size of the demand (the maximum amount
of kWh drawn in a given time period); and the season. A
net energy meter on a TOU pricing plan collects usage,
export and demand data for each TOU period.
Billing for NEM Customers Customers in the NEM program are on a 12-month billing
cycle called the “true-up period.” As a NEM customer, you’ll
receive two bills each month:
• Your regular monthly PG&E bill, which will cover your
minimum electric charges; any applicable gas charges;
and non-energy charges including demand charges for
medium and large non-residential customers.
• Your Net Energy Metering (NEM) Electric Statement, which
provides details about your net charges and credits (based
on your electric rate schedule) under the NEM program as
well as your meter reads
At the end of your 12-month billing cycle, you’ll receive a
"true-up statement”—a reconciliation of all electric usage
charges and credits. If you have any remaining credits, that
amount will be reset to zero. If you have any remaining
charges, that amount will become payable on your regular
PG&E bill that month.
In addition, if you generate more electricity than you use
over your true-up period, you’ll be eligible to receive payment
for the excess electricity, called Net Surplus Compensation
(NSC). The NSC rate will vary and is based on current energy
market prices. As a NEM customer, you don’t need to take any
action to receive compensation; eligibility will be determined
automatically at the end of each true-up period.
It is important to note that this compensation is different than
the energy credits you may receive monthly under the NEM
program. Only customers who generated more electricity than
they used in total at the end of the true-up period are eligible
to receive payment. You can keep track of your total net energy
generation or consumption throughout the true-up period on
your NEM Electric Statement by referring to the Energy
True-Up History table (“Total Energy” column).
Payment Options If you’re a residential or small commercial customer,
you have the option of making monthly payments for
your electric charges as reflected on your NEM Electric
Statement, or waiting until the end of your annual true-up
period to pay any balance on your account. If you decide
to make monthly payments, these payments will not be
reflected in your monthly NEM Electric Statement, but will
appear as a credit on your regular PG&E bill and will be
applied toward your account balance. If you expect to use
more energy than you generate at the end of your true-up
period, you may want to pay some portion of the balance
shown on your NEM Electric Statement each month to avoid
getting one large bill at the end of the 12-month period.
If you’re an agricultural, medium or large commercial
customer, your energy payments will be due every month.
This includes all non-energy charges such as demand
charges, meter charges and customer charges.
How to contact us Solar Customer Service Center:
Monday–Friday 8 a.m.–5 p.m.
1-877-743-4112
For more information www.pge.com/solar www.pge.com/nembilling
Frequently Asked Questions
Billing Who should I contact for questions about my electric account or NEM bills?
Contact PG&E’s Solar Customer Service Center for
any account questions. The Solar Customer Service
Center, available Monday–Friday from 8 a.m.–5 p.m.,
can be reached at 1-877-743-4112 or visit
www.pge.com/nembilling.
Why am I receiving two bills?
When you become a NEM customer, you’re put on
a 12-month billing cycle, and you’ll receive a PG&E
bill and a NEM Electric Statement each month.
Your regular monthly PG&E bill will include any
applicable gas charges, non-energy charges and
a minimum electric service charge. Your NEM
Electric Statement will provide details about your
NEM program charges and credits.
What are “minimum electric charges” and “non-energy charges”?
Minimum electric charges apply only in months
when there is little or no electricity consumption.
The purpose of the minimum electric charge is
to pay for activities related to presenting the bill
and associated information to the customer.
These activities include reading the meter and
processing the data.
Non-energy charges include monthly meter charges
associated with your rate schedule and any applicable
taxes and fees that are not part of the “energy”
component of your rate schedule. You can view your
non-energy charges by looking up your applicable
rate schedule at www.pge.com/tariffs.
I’ve been making monthly payments. Why aren’t my payments reflected in my NEM Electric Statement?
Your payments are not reflected on your NEM Electric
Statement; they are reflected on your regular monthly
PG&E bill. Any excess monthly payments will appear
as a credit and will be applied toward your balance on
your account each month until your annual true-up
bill is generated.
California Solar Incentive How do I collect my California Solar Initiative (CSI) incentive?
You should contact your contractor for the final set
of documents needed to process and request your
CSI incentive. If you installed the system yourself or
if you need more information, email [email protected] to request your current status and next steps.
Excess Credits and Excess Generation How will I receive credit for energy I send to the grid? Will I receive a payment for any remaining excess credits?
Your NEM energy meter measures the difference between
the energy you export to the electric grid and the energy
you take from the grid. PG&E reads the meter monthly
and reports the net amount of energy exported or used
on your monthly NEM Electric Statement. Each month,
PG&E calculates a credit or charge based on your retail
electric rate schedule. Your credits and charges are
carried forward month to month within the 12-month
true-up period. In the 12th billing period, your net usage
charges and generation credits for the entire 12-month
true-up period will be totaled. If the monetary value of
the energy exported by your system equals or exceeds
the monetary value of the energy you consumed, then
you will have no energy charges for the true-up period.
Instead, you will have only non-energy-related electric
service charges. If you have any remaining monetary
credit, that amount will be reset to zero.
At the end of the 12-month true-up period, will I receive a payment for any remaining excess generation?
If you generate more energy than you consume during
your 12-month true-up period, you’ll be eligible to receive
payment for the excess electricity. This payment is called
Net Surplus Compensation. It’s calculated differently than
the NEM credit on your NEM Electric Statement. Your
household’s overall net energy usage will be evaluated to
determine your eligibility for Net Surplus Compensation.
The rate of compensation varies and will be based on
current market prices. As a NEM customer, you’ll be
automatically enrolled in this program.
Generators Why do I have to notify PG&E if I add to or change the components of my generating system?
Your Interconnection Agreement requires you to notify
PG&E of changes to your generating system because our
engineers will need to review any changes to ensure the
continued safety and reliability of the electric grid. If you
have any questions, please call our Solar Customer
Service Center at 1-877-743-4112.
Will having my own generator ensure that I have power during a blackout?
Blackout coverage depends on how your system is
configured. The contractor who installed your system
should be able to provide guidance on this.
“PG
&E
” re
fers
to
Pa
cif
ic G
as a
nd
Ele
ctr
ic C
om
pa
ny,
a s
ub
sid
iary
of
PG
&E
Co
rpo
rati
on
. ©
2012 P
acif
ic G
as a
nd
Ele
ctr
ic C
om
pa
ny.
All
rig
hts
re
se
rve
d. P
G&
E p
rin
ts its
ma
teri
als
wit
h s
oy-
ba
se
d in
ks
on
re
cyc
led
pa
pe
r.
Ma
rch
2012
CD
G-0
312-1
282