open enterprises collaborative innovation, authority and decision models
TRANSCRIPT
BACKGROUNDMARK SOKACIC – HOST
SERIAL ENTREPRENEUR
• CURRENTLY OPERATING AIROVATE – CREATING SOCIAL COMMERCE AND LOGISTICS PLATFORMS
• 18 YEARS EXPERIENCE IN 9 STARTUPS
• MAINLY IN WEB AND OUTDOOR EVENT TECHNOLOGY
BACKGROUND WHY THIS TOPIC?
THE INTERNET: A REVOLUTION IN COMMUNICATION, SOCIAL & BUSINESS
RELATIONSHIPS
•ARE THERE BETTER WAYS OF ORGANISING A BUSINESS?
•HOW DO YOU STAY AHEAD OF THE COMPETITION?
•IS CONTINUOUS INNOVATION THE ONLY WAY TO STAY AHEAD OF THE
COMPETITION?
TRENDS – INDUSTRY & SOCIETAL
•VALUE IS SHIFTING FROM TRANSACTIONS TO RELATIONSHIPS
•NEW INDUSTRIES TAKING SHAPE
•MASSIVE MARKET FRAGMENTATION & FRACTALISATION
•SHIFTING CONSUMPTION PATTERNS
PROPHETIC WORDS12 PRINCIPLES OF THE NETWORK ECONOMY – 1997 (WIRED MAGAZINE)KEVIN KELLY – FOUNDER OF WIRED MAGAZINE
FOUR OF THE NEW RULES
1. WEALTH WILL FLOW DIRECTLY FROM INNOVATION, NOT OPTIMISATION. WEALTH CREATED BY SEIZING
THE IMPERFECT UNKNOWN
2. IDEAL ENVIRONMENT FOR CULTIVATING THE UNKNOWN IS TO NURTURE THE AGILITY AND NIMBLENESS
OF NETWORKS
3. CULTIVATION OF THE UNKNOWN MEANS ABANDONING THE HIGHLY SUCCESSFUL KNOWN
4. AS THE NETWORK ECONOMY GROWS THE CYCLE OF “FIND, NURTURE, DESTROY” HAPPENS FASTER AND
MORE INTENSELY
THE INNOVATORS DILEMMA
• ESTABLISHED COMPANIES DO ALL THE IMPORTANT THINGS RIGHT
• DOING ALL THE RIGHT THINGS MAKES THESE COMPANIES FAIL
THINK KODAK, FORD, NOKIA, HARVEY NORMAN, BLACKBERRY
• DISRUPTIVE INNOVATIONS USUALLY START BY SELLING TO NEW OR UNPROFITABLE
CUSTOMERS
• COMPANIES INVEST IN IMPROVING MAINSTAY PRODUCTS OR SYSTEMS, OFTEN TO THE
POINT WHERE QUALITY OUTSTRIPS WHAT THE MARKET NEEDS
Clayton Christensen - 1997
STRUCTURE
•COLLABORATIVE INNOVATION – WHY DO IT?
•OPEN ENTERPRISES – WHAT ARE THEY?
•AUTHORITY & CONTROL – HOW TO CO-ORDINATE?
•DECISION MODELS – WHO DECIDES?
COLLABORATIVE INNOVATION– WHY DO IT?
• DECREASE COSTS AND INCREASE VALUE TO THE CUSTOMER
• INCREASED AGILITY AND SPEED TO MARKET
• COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE TO THOSE WHO LEARN HOW TO EMBRACE DE-CENTRALISED
POINTS OF CONTROL
• RELATIONSHIP TECHNOLOGIES ENHANCE, AMPLIFY, EXTEND, AUGMENT, AND DEVELOP
SOFT RELATIONSHIPS
COLLABORATIVE INNOVATION– WHY DO IT?
•RICH, UP TO DATE, DYNAMIC PRODUCTS & SERVICES
• LOWEST COST OF PRODUCTION
•GREATEST DEGREE OF INNOVATION & DIVERSITY
•GREATEST EXPOSURE AND AWARENESS OF ACTUAL MARKET STATE
•HARNESS COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE
• E.G GOOGLE ANDROID, OPEN STREET MAP, GOLDCORPT
WHAT IS AN OPEN ENTERPRISE?MAXIMAL USE OF COST LEVERS
• USING OPEN SOURCE PRODUCTS
• OPEN DATA
• OPEN CONTENT
• OPEN COMMUNITIES
• OPEN THINKING
INNOVATION IN OPERATION
• NEW METHODS OF VALUE CREATION
• NEW METHODS OF VALUE
TRANSFORMATION
• NEW METHODS OF CONTROL
• NEW METHODS OF DECISION MAKING
• NEW METHODS OF OWNERSHIP
THE OPEN ENTERPRISE MODEL
CASE STUDY BETTERMEANS.ORG
• A DEMOCRATIC AND MERITOCRATIC BASED BUSINESS MODEL
• VALUES CENTRED FORMATION
• DEMOCRATIC PARTICIPATION & DECISION MAKING
• VARIOUS OWNERSHIP MODELS POSSIBLE – MEMBERSHIP, EQUITY, CREDIT
• SPEEDY DECENTRALISED AND AGILE DECISION PROCESS
AUTHORITY & CONTROL- HOW TO CO-ORDINATE?
HIERARCHY OF TRUSTED MEMBERSHIP
• BOARD – OF TRUSTED ADVISORS
• CORE TEAM
• MEMBERS
• CONTRIBUTORS
• ACTIVE USERS – VOLUNTEERS
• COMMUNITY OF USERS
AUTHORITY & CONTROLH
OW
TO
CO
-OR
DIN
AT
E?
WORK STRUCTURE
DECISION MODELS– WHO DECIDES?
THE PROCESS – ALL INPUT WELCOME AT EACH DECISION POINT FROM ALL MEMBERS
PROPOSE, DISCUSS, VOTE DECIDE
DECISION MODELS – BASED ON SCOPE OF DECISION AND STATUS WITHIN THE ORGANISATION
(TRUST LEVEL) I.E. BINDING & NON BINDING VOTES
• LAZY CONSENSUS
• LAZY MAJORITY
• UNANIMOUS CONSENSUS
• CREDIT MAJORITY
AGILE DECISION MODEL
IDEAS FOR NEXT EVENT?SOMETHING THAT ENTREPRENEURS HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR A
LONG TIME
A NEW WAY TO SPLIT EQUITY IN A PRE-REVENUE STARTUP
DYNAMIC EQUITY SPLITTING USING THE GRUNT FUND CONCEPT
BY MIKE MOYER, AUTHOR OF SLICING PIE
REFERENCESCATEGORY: OPEN ENTERPRISESCASE STUDY: BETTERMEANS.COM
• OPEN ENTERPRISE MANIFESTO @ BETTERMEANS.ORG
• OPEN ENTERPRISE GOVERNANCE MODEL @ BETTERMEANS.ORG
• HTTP://OPENNEWS.COM.AU/
• HTTP://WWW.ZDNET.COM/BLOG/HINCHCLIFFE/THE-EMERGING-CASE-
FOR-OPEN-BUSINESS-METHODS/218
CATEGORY: INNOVATION, FRACTAL MARKETS• MOORE, G. A. (2005). DEALING WITH DARWIN: HOW GREAT COMPANIES
INNOVATE AT EVERY PHASE OF THEIR EVOLUTION.
• CHRISTENSEN, C. (1997). THE INNOVATOR'S DILEMMA: WHEN NEW
TECHNOLOGIES CAUSE GREAT FIRMS TO FAIL
CATEGORY: TRENDS, SOCIAL ECONOMY• BEINHOCKER, E., DAVIS, I., & MENDONCA, L. (2009). THE 10 TRENDS YOU
HAVE TO WATCH. HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, 87(7-8), 55-60.
• HTTP://WWW.ZDNET.COM/BLOG/HINCHCLIFFE/TWENTY-TWO-POWER-
LAWS-OF-THE-EMERGING-SOCIAL-ECONOMY/961
• KELLY, K. (1997). 3.14 NEW RULES FOR THE NEW ECONOMY: TWELVE
DEPENDABLE PRINCIPLES FOR THRIVING IN A TURBULENT WORLD8.
• KELLY, K. (1998) NEW RULES FOR THE NEW ECONOMY: 10 RADICAL
STRATEGIES FOR A CONNECTED WORLD.
CATEGORY: BUSINESS MODELS AND DESIGN• MINTZBERG, H. (1993). STRUCTURE IN FIVES: DESIGNING EFFECTIVE
ORGANIZATIONS. PRENTICE-HALL, INC.
• HAMEL, G., & BREEN, B. (2007). THE FUTURE OF MANAGEMENT. HARVARD
BUSINESS PRESS.
• HTTP://JOAQUINROCA.COM/2013/03/ORGANIZATION-DESIGN-FOR-
STARTUPS/