online participatory projects and exhibitions
DESCRIPTION
Using creative competitions as a technique for audience outreach for museums and galleries. Case studies from Outside In, My East End and Snapshot Brighton. By Peter Pavement of Surface Impression, www.surfaceimpression.comTRANSCRIPT
Online participatory projects and exhibitions
Peter PavementSurface Impressionwww.surfaceimpression.com
Engaging with a creative audience
Outside InPallant House Gallery, Chichester
My East EndBishopsgate InstituteFour CornersGeoffrye MuseumBirkbeck College
Snapshot BrightonBrighton Photo FringeWhite Night Nuit BlancheBrighton & Hove City Council
User generated content (UGC), especially creative content (art, photographs, video, creative writing) can be used to:
create an all new show
make a connection between audience
and a collection, a place or a theme.
reach new audiences, who might not be aware of your organisation or what it has to offer
however…
There are a lot of competitors out there, hungry for your audience's contributions
The big ones, Facebook, Twitter, Wordpress etc have the lion’s share of UGC
And there are layers of competition within those services
So submissions to your project can be slow or embarrassingly absent altogether
So what can you do to attract contributions…
Answer: run a competitionA competition ignites interest. People focus on:
The prize If it's relevant to the art form, all the better
The judge(s) They like the chance to validate their work against the opinions of the judges, especially when you have famous names as judges
The deadline The well intended don't keep putting off putting something on your site, they know there's a cut off point
The exposure Being published or exhibited means a lot to most creative people
Curating the submissions
As an extension to the brief of the Outside In exhibition we created an online selection process
The aim of this was to
make selection faster,
fairer for submitting artists
and scalable if there was a large number of applicants
If you’ve ever been on a selection panel, you'll know that:
you assess work very differently at the start than at the end of the day
you can waste a lot of time arguing with other judges
and it takes ages to get through all the submissions
The judges came up with selection criteria and entered them online
Then they rated each piece in turn against that criteria
By making the criteria the only way to assess a piece of work, the judge rates all contributions more fairly
The judge can pause the process and pick it up again at a later hour or day
So the process doesn't have to be so arduous.
The results are displayed as a ranked gallery
The entries and contact information for contributors is all nicely stored and sorted in an online database
So galleries can instantly be created as part of the website.
People can be kept informed of events, exhibition progress and other opportunities by email newsletter
What we've learned
No two competitions are the same, you have to adapt techniques and support for each one
Community groups who submit work for lots of people often need the most support
Live workshops in the space of a museum or gallery generates loads of excellent material
Becoming part of a project like Outside In can make a big difference to people's lives
Audiences respond really favourably to the organisations involved