oneview pipeline im

Rolta Proprietary & Confidential

ROLTA Where Expertise & Technology Meet

NOTICE: Proprietary and Confidential. This material is proprietary to Rolta and contains trade secret and confidential information which is solely the property of Rolta. This material is solely for

Client's internal use. This material shall not be used, reproduced, copied, disclosed, and transmitted, in whole or in part, without the express consent of Rolta.

Pipeline Integrity Management

May 20, 2015



Agenda

2

•Rolta Introduction•Rolta OneView™•Integrity Management•Dashboard Examples•Proof of Concept Approach



About Rolta� Established public company, 30 years young

� Global company – Projects in 40+ Countries

� 3,500 employees & growing

� Annual Revenue of $600 MM

� Forbes Global 200 Best Companies – 4 times in 6 years

� SAP Pinnacle Award winner in 2014

3



Engineering GIS IT

ROLTA OneView – Innovative Solution3 decades of expertise in Engineering, GIS and IT



Rolta OneView

5

Rolta OneView

Operation Insights

Production

Consumption

Operating Risks

Operating Cost

Maintenance & Reliability

Insights

Maintenance

Equipment Reliability

Inspection

Maintenance Cost

Asset Insights

Facilities, Assets

Asset Historian / performance

Asset Explorer

Asset Management

HSE Insights

HSE Management

Health

Safety

Environment

Sustainability

Insights

Planet

People

Profit

Practices

Supply Chain Insights

Inventory Management

Service Contracts

Spares

Logistics Execution

Project Insights

Planning

Progress Tracking

Resources

Project Cost

Business Insights

Finance

Contracts, Entitlement, Interest set

HR

Sales & Marketing



6

Standards Based Data Model

ISO62264, Open O&M, PPDMMaintenance

Operations

Engineering

Manual Input

Capital Projects

Supply Chain

Finance

• SAP

• JDE

• Oracle

• SAP APO

• Aspen

• Primavera

• MS Project

• SharePoint

• Intergraph

• AspenTech

• AutoCAD

• Bentley

• Aveva

• ESRI

• IP21

• OSI Pi

• Honeywell

• Yokogawa

• Siemens

• Emerson

• DB

• Excel

•SAPPM

• Maximo

•Oracle EAM

• Passport

• DataStream

•Linear Asset

Management

• Meridium

• Capstone

• DB / Excel

HSE

• SAP

• IHS

Reliability

• SAP QM

• Labware

• StarLIMS

• Sample Manager

Quality



Integrity Management Overview

7

#1#1

#2#2

#3#3

Regulatory compliance is not on the decline. Quite the opposite, it is on the rise.

Operators are accountable to Documented IM programsOperators are accountable to Documented IM programs

If you have to do it, why not make it work for you?If you have to do it, why not make it work for you?



Integrity Management System

8

KnowledgeKnowledge

Identify ThreatsIdentify Threats

Evaluate and Rank Risk

Evaluate and Rank Risk Identify and

Implement Measures to Address Risk

Identify and Implement

Measures to Address Risk

Measure Performance and Monitor

Results

Measure Performance and Monitor

Results

Periodic Evaluation and Improvement

Periodic Evaluation and Improvement

Reporting Results

Reporting Results

Distribution

Model

Distribution

Model



Pipeline Integrity Management System

192.1007 Regulation Element Rolta Compliance

1 Knowledge

2 Identify Threats

3 Evaluate and Rank Risk

4 Identity and Implement Measures to Address Risks

5 Measure Performance, Monitor Results and Evaluate Effectiveness

6 Periodic Evaluation and Improvement

7 Report Results

9

192 Sub Part Pipeline- DIMP 192.1007



Pipeline Integrity Management System

192.911 Elements Rolta Compliance

1 ID HCA Continuously

2 Identify Threats

3 Data Integration

4 Risk Assessment

5 Integrity Assessment

6 Repair Remediation

7 Continuous improvement P&M and QA/QC and ongoing communication in reporting

10

Operators TIMP 192.901-951



Keeping away from the IM overload

• New and revised regulations are elevating pipeline safety requirements—grandfathered pipe is being eliminated, and integrity management requirements are being expanded in CFR Title 49.

• Proactive Integrity Monitoring And Mitigation Can Expedite Integrity Improvements While Physical Assets Are Being Upgraded

11



Implementing Management Systems improves

Integrity and Profitability which equals Data, Asset

and Lifecycle Management

• Material and construction defects, e.g. defective longitudinalpipe seam, pipe body or joint welds;

• Mechanical damage from construction, maintenance or third-partyexcavation;

• Incorrect operation;• Corrosion, creep and cracking mechanisms;• Device failures and malfunctions; Operation of ASV’s• Earth forces such as earthquakes, land slips or telluric currents and

weather related threats such as high winds, rain, hurricanes, tornadoes or any other circumstances that place an Operator in irregular operating environments.



Pipeline RisksTime Dependent

Threats

External Corrosion

•Coating Condition Degradation

•Inadequate Cathodic Protection

Internal Corrosion

•Material Composition / Contaminants

•Material Erosive Characteristics

Stress / Cracking

•Stress Corrosion Cracking

•Embrittlement

•Operating Temperature Impact

•Vibration Impact

•Reduction In Pipeline Support

Stable Threats

Manufacturing Related

•Long Seam Defects

•Pipe Defects

Construction/ Fabrication Related

•Girth Weld Girth Weld Brittleness

•Coupled Welds

•Wrinkle Bends

•Branch Connections

Equipment Related

•Gaskets

•Relief Valves/ Regulators

Time Independent Threats

Excavation Damage

•Physical Damage Dents

•Breakage

Incorrect Operations

•Human error, inadequate training, failure to follow procedures

•Internal pressure operations to Design Max and HCA

•Stress factors (cycling from steady state operations)

Weather & Outside

•Geological Impact

•Thermal Displacements (Flash Freeze or Heat)

13



Risk Analysis and Mitigation Process

14

Risk Models

Maintenance

Management

Data

Asset Data

Pipeline

Geospatial

Data (ESRI)

Engineering

DataFinancial Data

Inspection

Data

Monitoring /

Operations

Data

Evaluate RisksProject Risk Over Time

Implement Mitigation Measures

Monitor Mitigation Measures



Collaborating to find the path to IM complianceand operational excellence

15

Ma

inte

na

nce

Spe

nd

ing

Qu

ality C

on

trol a

nd

Qu

ality A

ssura

nce

Initiating Aware Understanding Competence Excellence

Asset Management Maturity

Timeline

Monitoring

quality of

repairs/data

tracking

Ongoing

documented M&R

or Reactive to

internal and

external causes

IM Processes

for

preventative

and proactive

maintenance Ongoing

maintenance

and

reporting

Monitoring of

QA / QC WO

requests /

maintenance

Lifecycle and

asset

management

Real-time

data for IM

compliance

Focus IM for

improved

process and

operational

excellence

Increased operational value through

improved capital investment

Decrease cost, improve quality,

reduction in cycle time.

Repair

monitoring

and

compliance



16

Collaborating to find the path to IM complianceand operational excellence



Challenges Rolta OneView Addresses Impacting IM Programs

• Structured and unstructured data—cumbersome manual processes

• Operational complexity—reviewing related data from many sources

• Location/Coordinates/GPS

• Buffer zones for HCAs—maintaining GIS data, required compliance measures and timelines

• Stationed Centerlines/Routes/Series/Line Hierarchy

• Training / Skills / Certifications

• Contractor / Service provider work management

• Right information/right time

‘Situational Awareness’

AssetData

EngineeringData

ProcessSafetyData

PeopleData



Dashboard Examples of IM KPIs



19



20



21



Proof of Concept (POC) Approach in validating Rolta OneView



Typical On-Premise POC Approach

• Connectors to

source system

• Data certification

• Meta data

mapping

• KPIs

• Dashboards

• Access Control

• Connectors to

source system

• Data certification

• Meta data

mapping

• KPIs

• Dashboards

• Access Control

• Data source

mapping

• Connectivity to

source systems

• Additional Work

Process Design

• Documentation

• Sign-off & Release

for Configuration

• Data source

mapping

• Connectivity to

source systems

• Additional Work

Process Design

• Documentation

• Sign-off & Release

for Configuration

• KPI scope

finalization

• Calculation

Methods

• Source System

Analysis

• Prototyping

• Infrastructure

• Use case sign-off

• KPI scope

finalization

• Calculation

Methods

• Source System

Analysis

• Prototyping

• Infrastructure

• Use case sign-off

Discovery Blue PrintingConfiguration &

Customization

• Unit Testing

• Integration

Testing

• System Testing

• User Reviews

• Unit Testing

• Integration

Testing

• System Testing

• User Reviews

Test

• Training

• Acceptance

Testing

• UAT Sign Off

• Data Migration

• Go-Live

• Production

Support

• Training

• Acceptance

Testing

• UAT Sign Off

• Data Migration

• Go-Live

• Production

Support

Deploy

Week 1 Week 3 Week 4 Week 8 Week 10

Resource Usage

Equivalent of 0.5 FTE needed for the duration of the POC

Maint. & Reliability LeadProduction Lead

OSI-PI OwnerIT Support Personnel

Pilot Project Manager

Project Stakeholder(s)

23



Q & A

•Question and answer session



NOTICE: Proprietary and Confidential. This material is proprietary to Rolta and contains trade secret and confidential information which is solely the property of Rolta. This material is solely for

Client's internal use. This material shall not be used, reproduced, copied, disclosed, and transmitted, in whole or in part, without the express consent of Rolta.

Thank You!

For any additional questions, please contact Ricky Barrera [email protected]

oneview pipeline im

Documents

property of rolta

express consent of rolta

confidential information

decades of expertise

pipeline integrity management

risk measure performance

rank risk

im programs operators