one police plaza security plan eis chapter 7: traffic …€¦ · · 2009-02-18one police plaza...
TRANSCRIPT
7-1
One Police Plaza Security Plan EISCHAPTER 7: TRAFFIC AND PARKING
A. INTRODUCTION
This section of the EIS discusses the transportation characteristics and any potential impactsassociated with the security plan implemented shortly after September 11, 2001 by the New YorkCity Police Department (NYPD) in order to protect City, State, and Federal facilities in the “civiccenter” portion of lower Manhattan which were at the time, and continue to be consideredpotential terrorist targets. As discussed in Chapter 1, “Project Description,” the securitymeasures include attended security checkpoint booths, planters, bollards and hydraulically-operated delta barriers to restrict the access of unauthorized vehicles from the roadways situatedadjacent to the civic facilities located near One Police Plaza. The traffic and parking analysisfocuses on the vehicle diversions related to the street closures that are part of the security plan.In addition, on-street and off-street parking conditions are included in the analysis.
The traffic study area and analysis locations focus on the perimeter of the security zone and onother key intersections which are considered principal diversion paths. The study area for thetransportation analyses is shown in Figure 7-1. The study area was selected to encompass thoseroadways most likely to be used by the majority of vehicles traveling through the area near OnePolice Plaza, as well as those roadways most affected by the traffic diversions due to the securityplan. As shown in Figure 7-1, the study area is bounded by Kenmare and Broome Streets to thenorth, Greene Street and Church Street to the west, John Street to the south, and Pearl Street,Madison Street, Pike Street, and Allen Street to the east. Forty intersections (38 signalized and2 unsignalized) were analyzed in detail for vehicular traffic during the 8-9 AM, 12-1 midday, and5-6 PM peak hours. These peak hours were chosen for analysis based on a review of the peaktravel time for the area surrounding One Police Plaza and are the periods most likely to beimpacted by the security plan. Potential impacts from trips diverted as a result of the securityplan are identified based on criteria defined in the CEQR Technical Manual.
As also noted in Chapter 1, “Project Description,” some portions of the security zone wereimplemented in 1999 and are not part of the action, but considered under No-Action conditions.The security zone has been operational for over four years and therefore the transportation effectsof the action (the With-Action condition) are readily evident and are documented in the fieldunder 2006 conditions.
As portions of Pearl Street (southbound) and Madison Street were already closed in 1999, theprincipal circulation effect of the action has been the closure of Park Row which, prior to itsclosure, carried up to 900 two-way vehicles per hour (vph) including several NYC Transit bus
EAST R
IVER
BROOKLYN BRIDGE
MADISON ST.
DIVISION ST. RUTGERS ST.
E. BROADWAY
MARKET ST.
PIKE ST.
HENRY ST.
CATHERINE ST
OLIVER ST.
MONROE ST.
WATER ST
.
MARKET SLIP
CATHERINE SLIP
CHERRY ST.
SOUTH ST
.
HESTER ST.
FORS
YTH
ST.
BROOME ST
ELDR
IDG
E ST
.
ESSE
X ST
LUD
LOW
ST.
OR
CH
ARD
ST.
ALLE
N ST
.
CANAL ST.
FORSYTH ST.
BOW
ERY
HESTER ST.
CHRY
STIE
ST.
GRAND ST.
MO
TT S
T.
DOYER ST
PELL ST.
MU
LBER
RY
ST.
BAYARD ST.
CHAT
HAM
SQ
PARK R
OW
PEARL ST.
PEAR
L ST.
CATHERINE ST.
R F WAGNER PL
MOSCO ST
THOMAS PAINE ST.
BAXT
ER S
T
JAMES ST
ST.JA
MES
PL.
DELANCEY ST
ALLE
N ST
TRYON ROW
ROSE
ST
EAST
RIV
ER
BROOKLYN BRIDGE
CHUR
CH S
T CLIFF
ST
FRANKFORT ST
FRANKFORT ST
PACE
PZ
GO
LD S
T
GOLD
ST
SPRUCE ST
PARK R
OW
WIL
LIAM
ST
BEEKMAN ST
NASS
AU S
T
THEA
TRE
AL
ANN ST
FULTON ST
WAT
ER ST
ROBERT F WAGNER SR PL
PECK SLIPPECK SLIP
DOVER ST
DEY ST
FULTON ST
VESEY ST
BARCLAY ST
JOHN ST
FRON
T STW
ATER
ST
BEEKMAN ST
PEAR
L ST
RYDE
RS A
L
PLATT ST
DUTC
H ST
FULTON ST
JOHN ST
LIBE
RTY
PL
LIBERTY ST
MAIDEN LA
CEDAR ST
CORTLANDT ST
SOUT
H ST
THOMAS ST
FOLE
Y SQ
BAXT
ER S
T
CENT
RE S
T
WORTH ST
LAFA
YETT
E ST
POLI
CE P
Z
CH ST
BAXTER ST
HOGAN PL
PEARL ST
W B
ROAD
WAY
AVE OF THE AMERICAS
CANAL ST
LISPENARD ST
WALKER ST
BRO
ADW
AY
WHITE ST
CHUR
CH S
T
FRAN
KLIN
PL
CORT
LAND
T AL
LEONARD ST
FRANKLIN ST
BENS
ON
PL
CATHERINE LA
LAFA
YETT
E ST
CHAMBERS ST
READE ST
DUANE ST
AVENUE OF THE FINEST
PARK R
OW
CARD
INAL H
AYES
PL
MADISON ST
CENT
RE S
T
ELK
ST
REPUBLICAN AL
MAN
HATT
AN A
L
W B
ROAD
WAY
CHUR
CH S
T
BRO
ADW
AY
PARK PL
MURRAY ST
WARREN ST
PEDE
STRIA
N ST
W B
ROAD
WAY
ROOME ST
RING ST LAFA
YETT
E ST
SPRING ST
GRAND ST
CLEV
ELAN
D PL
BROOME ST
WO
OST
ER S
T
SPRING ST
GRE
ENE
ST
GRAND ST CENT
RE M
ARKE
T PL
KENMARE ST
CRO
SBY
ST
MER
CER
ST
LAFA
YETT
E ST
BRO
ADW
AY
BROOME ST
HOWARD ST
GRAND ST
CENT
RE S
T
BAXT
ER S
TCANAL ST
MUL
BERR
Y ST
MO
TT S
T
ELIZ
ABET
H ST
HESTER ST
BOW
ERY
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS
Analyzed Intersections (Signalized)Analyzed Intersections (Unsignalized)
LegendStudy Area Boundary
Figure 7-1Traffic Study Area
ATR LocationSecurity ZoneTraffic Direction
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS Chapter 7: Traffic and Parking
7-2
routes. Prior to the closure of Pearl Street, which traversed westbound through the zone, thisroadway carried up to 500 vph. Traffic flow on Park Row, prior to closure, originated from twomain components: (a) through traffic between Chinatown and Lower Manhattan via the Boweryand (b) traffic exiting from the inbound Brooklyn Bridge destined to Chinatown and pointsnorth/northeast (the reverse movement of this flow did not use Park Row). Therefore, prior toits closure, traffic flow on Park Row was split approximately 60-65% northbound and 35-40%southbound.
The closure of westbound Pearl Street reduced the limited number of east-to-west streetconnections for travel northbound east of Church Street. Westbound Pearl Street was also themain connector for traffic exiting the southbound FDR Drive and headed to the Centre Streetcorridor within the Court District as well as to Chinatown.
Before its closure, Park Row, as well as other streets in the security zone, provided curbsideparking over much of their lengths. This parking has since been displaced. Also displaced werelocal bus operations and bus stops in the vicinity of the security zone.
As with other technical areas, the traffic and parking studies consider a No-Action condition andcompare it to a With-Action condition in order to assess any potential traffic and parking impactsresulting from the security plan, using impact criteria described in the CEQR Technical Manual.The analysis year is 2006. The 2006 No-Action traffic and parking conditions were documentedconsidering various secondary source data collected prior to the 2001 closures as well as datacollected in 2005 and 2006. These “baseline” conditions, such as traffic volumes, curbsideparking and other data are also included in this section for informational purposes.
Following the baseline discussion is an assessment of No-Action conditions (no security plan in2006) and With-Action conditions (the security plan in place in 2006) compared to the baselinepre-September 11, 2001 baseline condition.
B. BASELINE CONDITIONS
Vehicular Traffic
As discussed above, for the purpose of this analysis, the existing conditions are defined as thetransportation network existing prior to September 11, 2001 and after the closure of the selectedstreets in the area of One Police Plaza in 1999 (see Chapter 1, Figure 1-3 for 1999 street closurelocations). Various sources were used to compile a 2000 base network. The 1993 Foley SquareFEIS, 2004 Chinatown Access and Circulation Study, 2004 World Trade Center Memorial andRedevelopment Plan EIS, 2000 48-52 Franklin Street EAS, 2004 One Police Plaza Security Plan
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS Chapter 7: Traffic and Parking
7-3
EAS, the 2000 Woolworth Building Parking Garage EAS, and additional source material providedby NYCDOT served as sources for the construction of a 2000 base traffic network for the studyarea.
Study Area Street Network
The study area utilized for the traffic analysis, as shown on Figure 7-1, is bordered on the northby Kenmare and Broome Streets, Green Street and Church Street to the west, John Street to thesouth, and Pearl Street, Madison Street, Pike Street, and Allen Street to the east. Fortyintersections are analyzed in detail for the AM, midday and PM peak hours. The streetconfiguration in the study area south of Worth Street is very irregular and becomes more typicalof the Manhattan grid north of Worth Street. The street system includes a combination of north-south arterials as well as principal east-west streets. In addition, both the Brooklyn andManhattan Bridges have their Manhattan termini in the study area.
The main north-south arterials in the western portion of the study area are Church Street andBroadway, which form a northbound/southbound one-way couplet serving much of LowerManhattan north of Liberty Street. Church Street typically has four northbound travel lanes plusparking/loading lanes on each side of the street, while Broadway has three southbound travellanes plus a parking/loading lane on both sides of the street. The curb lanes on both ChurchStreet and Broadway typically have peak periods regulations. Towards the center of the studyarea, the Centre Street/Lafayette Street corridors carry most of the north-south traffic. CentreStreet is two-way with four travel lanes between the Brooklyn Bridge and Reade Street, and thenone-way northbound with typically two-to-three travel lanes plus parking/loading. LafayetteStreet also has two-to-three southbound travel lanes north of Reade Street. In the easterly portionof the study area lies Water Street/Pearl Street/St. James Place and the Bowery corridor. Thiscorridor is two-way and varies in width from two travel lanes (St. James Place) to four travellanes (remaining portions of much of the corridor), plus curbside parking/loading on both sidesalong most segments. Prior to its closure, the diagonal corridor of the Park Row/Bowery corridorwas also a key north-south corridor with four travel lanes plus curbside parking/loadingthroughout most of its length.
The principal east-west corridors in the study area are Canal Street, Worth Street and ChambersStreet. Each of the facilities are two-way and provide a different function. Canal Street is theprincipal arterial in this area and connects to the Manhattan Bridge, the Holland Tunnel andRoute 9A. Canal Street typically has four to six lanes plus curbside parking/loading with peakhour regulations. Worth Street and Chambers Street are smaller and similarly configured two-way streets, typically with two travel lanes plus curbside parking/loading on most blocks. WorthStreet traverses between the Bowery and Hudson Street (mainly as a circulator facility) whileChambers Street connects the Brooklyn Bridge/City Hall area to Route 9A and Battery Park Cityand provides both through and circulator functions.
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS Chapter 7: Traffic and Parking
7-4
The local street pattern in the study area is extensive, but not continuous with major interruptionsin the network due to City Hall, the complex of federal, state and city courts along Centre Street,the Manhattan and Brooklyn Bridges and numerous squares, large development blockconsolidations, and other features in this early New York street system. In addition, interruptionsin the system have occurred due to security zones, Duane Street east of Broadway due to 26Federal Plaza and, to the south, an extensive network surrounding the New York StockExchange.
Subsequent to 9/11, some key streets were taken out of service and remain temporarily closedin the vicinity of the World Trade Center (WTC) site. Of particular note is Vesey Street betweenRoute 9A and Church Street. Vesey Street was a principal eastbound traffic corridor connectingRoute 9A/Battery Park City to Park Row and points north. Vesey Street is likely to remainclosed for several additional years while the WTC site is being reconstructed. Further, given thesecurity issues associated with the Freedom Tower (to be built on Vesey Street), there is asignificant potential that Vesey Street may not return to its prior traffic distribution function. Inaddition, Foley Square itself has been reconstructed into a consolidated open space, severing anydirect connection between Pearl Street and Lafayette Street.
Chatham Square is a major confluence of roadways and a principal traffic element in the studyarea. Worth Street, Park Row, St. James Place, East Broadway, Bowery and Mott Street allconverge in Chatham Square with inbound volumes. Only Mott Street, among these sixroadways, is one-way and it is one-way into the square. Over 10 lanes of inbound traffic flow(not including Park Row) compete with pedestrians for available capacity at Chatham Square.The square was reconfigured in 2000, prior to the closure of Park Row, to add a consolidatedspace and better organize the fragmented traffic islands.
Surface Transit Network
In conjunction with the street network, the local bus system has also changed in response to boththe security plan and other Lower Manhattan street closures. Figure 7-2 shows the LowerManhattan area bus route maps for 2000, 2003 and 2005. As shown in the figure, prior toimplementing the security plan in 2001, Park Row hosted the M9, M15, M103 and B51 busroutes. The M9 route operated between Union Square and South End Avenue in Battery ParkCity, while the M15 (the segment thru Park Row) traversed from East 126th Street to City Hallvia 1st and 2nd Avenues. The M103 operated between East 125th Street and City Hall viaLexington and 3rd Avenues, while the B51 route traversed from the Fulton Mall in Brooklyn toCity Hall (Manhattan) via the Manhattan Bridge. Together these four bus routes provided 25 to30 buses per hour in each direction during the peak commuter periods. It should be noted thatprior to May 2005, all four routes detoured around the security zone, with most using WorthStreet and St. James Place for travel to/from City Hall (see Figure 7-2, 2003 map). Due to theclosure of Vesey Street, the M9 route no longer crosses through the City Hall area, but reaches
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS Chapter 7: Traffic and Parking
7-5
South End Avenue in Battery Park City by looping around the southern tip of Manhattan viaPearl Street/Water Street and Battery Place.
In May 2005, the M103 bus returned to its original route via Park Row (see Figure 7-2, 2005map) on a trial basis. Buses that traverse the security zone are subject to inspection and there areno stops within the zone itself, but on either end of it. The test was expanded in November 2005when the M15 and B51 buses also returned to their original routes via Park Row to/from CityHall.
Baseline Traffic Volumes
Figure 7-3 shows the estimated baseline traffic volumes in the study area for the weekday AM,midday and PM peak hours. It should be noted that the baseline condition is presented as areference to show pre-Park Row closure conditions. As noted above, this network represents pre-2001 historical data and does not reflect the loss of millions of square feet of office space andsubstantial street changes in Lower Manhattan and the study area.
The baseline data shows that traffic volumes entering the overall security zone, mainly from ParkRow (north and south), Pearl Street and the Brooklyn Bridge Manhattan bound exit ramp to ParkRow amount to 1,259, 1,079, and 1,193 vehicles per hour in the AM, midday and PM peak hours,respectively. These three entering volumes are the principal flows that were subject to diversionupon implementation of the security plan after 9/11. Under the baseline condition, approximately271, 123, and 201 vehicles per peak hour exited the Brooklyn Bridge ramp to northbound ParkRow and other local streets in the AM, midday and PM peak hours, respectively. The baselinedata also show other selected traffic patterns of note. Eastbound Vesey Street at Broadwaycontributed substantial volume to northbound Park Row. There was also a substantial volumeon westbound Pearl Street that then proceeded through Foley Square to access Lafayette Streetand then to westbound Reade Street. As discussed below, both of the above flows no longer exist(or are feasible) due to actions independent of the security zone and their absence, and otherchanges in Lower Manhattan make a comparison of baseline traffic volumes with the 2006 No-Action conditions a difficult one.
191626
46
215289
43
162
38406
217
108996
840
36
91
941274
5137654
5314
5617
6
135
835
50
303
19
151
25
475
45
303
BOW
ERY
876147
460
728
914
89
23 998
39984
848
32 96
181
223161
127
448
192 19573
72176
414
251
24920
717
6
298
376
600
HESTER ST
CANAL ST
CANAL ST
CENT
RE S
TGRAND ST
HOWARD ST
BROOME ST
BRO
ADW
AY
LAFA
YETT
E ST
MER
CER
ST
CRO
SBY
ST
KENMARE ST
CENT
RE M
ARKE
T PL
GRAND ST
GRE
ENE
ST
SPRING ST
WO
OST
ER S
T
BROOME ST CLEV
ELAN
D PL
SPRING ST
LAFA
YETT
E ST
G ST
OME ST
W B
ROAD
WAY
PEDE
STRI
AN ST
WARREN ST
MURRAY ST
PARK PL
BRO
ADW
AY
CHUR
CH S
T
REPUBLICAN AL
ELK
ST
MADISON ST
PARK
ROW
AVENUE OF THE FINEST
DUANE ST
READE ST
CHAMBERS ST
LAFA
YETT
E ST
FRANKLIN ST
LEONARD ST
CORT
LAND
T AL
FRAN
KLIN
PL
CHUR
CH S
T
WHITE ST
BRO
ADW
AY
WALKER ST
LISPENARD ST
CANAL ST
AVE OF THE AMERICAS
W B
ROAD
WAY
PEARL ST
HOGAN PL
LAFAYETTE ST
WORTH ST
CENT
RE S
T
BAXT
ER S
T
FOLE
Y SQ
THOMAS ST
TRIM
BLE
PL
SOUT
H ST
CORTLANDT ST MAIDEN LA
LIBERTY ST
LIBE
RTY
PL
JOHN ST
FULTON ST
DUTC
H ST
PLATT ST
PEAR
L ST
BEEKMAN ST
WAT
ER ST
FRON
T ST
JOHN ST
BARCLAY ST
VESEY ST
FULTON ST
DEY ST
DOVER ST
PECK SLIP
PECK SLIP
WAT
ER ST
FULTON ST
ANN ST THEA
TRE
AL
NASS
AU S
T
BEEKMAN ST
WIL
LIAM
STPA
RK ROW
SPRUCE ST
GOLD
ST
FRANKFORT ST
CLIFF
ST
CHUR
CH S
T
ROSE
ST
TRYO
N ROW
ALLE
N ST
DELANCEY STALLEN ST
BOW
ERY
RIVINGTON ST.
ST.J
AMES
PL.
JAMES ST
WORTH ST
MOSCO ST
R F WAGNER PL
CATHERINE ST.
PEARL ST.
PARK R
OW
CHAT
HAM
SQ
BAYARD ST.
MUL
BERR
Y ST
.
PELL ST.
DOYER ST
MO
TT S
T.
ELIZ
ABET
H ST
.
CHRY
STIE
ST.
BOW
ERY
FORSYTH ST.
CANAL ST.
ALLE
N ST
.
ORC
HARD
ST.
LUDL
OW
ST.
ELDR
IDG
E ST
.
BROOME S
FORS
YTH
ST.
HESTER ST.
SOUTH ST.
CHERRY ST.
CATHERINE SLIP
WATER ST
.
MONROE ST.OLIVER ST.
HENRY ST.
PIKE ST.
MARKET ST.
E. BROADWAY
DIVISION ST.
16
41 8015
69
169262
23240
937
162424
9228 822
378
133 89
6
371394
1024
160
106
122170
573
1093
101
45220
1036239
89363
1093
723
75
5635
284
268912
111
480131252
3916
607
165
557
164
272
1533123
570
204
376
339
353
295
12
2729846
292
66439
134
73018
4
80
48
63
11894403
NB FDR OFFRAMPDOVER ST
BROOKLYN BR ONRAMPFRANKFORT ST
FDR ONRAMP
13 305
73
112186
66
1862
112
5
FDR ONRAMP
BROOKLYN BR OFFRAMP
R F WAGNER PL
454
13
4714632
520
25990
427
80173
384
292
408
807
86
764
EAST
RIV
ER
BROOKLYN BRIDGE
BENS
ON
PL
CATHERINE LA
828
86
90
306182
123
812
106
12140 81
3645
90187
381578
26
63208
15
96
172
713
604
231
679
1173109
83250
195
99895 2341221856
225
234
669
173
803
109117
25 329
31866
9
85828
80
21
31
2
34320
18716
621
125
102
523
88 542 333
888309
10
223
61 683
65
26242
17990
44
36576
39592
66123
49 375
42164
226
1059672
70299
40477
623
8
0
00
589
359
405
254
3
7225
25967
20
31
10
61
321
1246
191
5
8
26
14
15
296
319
712
8
7
12
271
234
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS Figure 7-3a2000 Baseline Traffic Volumes - AM Peak Hour
Signalized IntersectionsUnsignalized Intersections
Legend
Security Zone
515
511
2620186
34339
73
48
112
106
307
443
345107
230
28
33267
12
272
255
250
211 83
19121
31
198
54 136
99482
863
30398
290707
175132
72 628
410
15190
348
125
549
251449
771
71
315
601
35 123
366105
699
40203
167194
1177
8148
30
DIVISION ST.
E. BROADWAY
MARKET ST.
PIKE ST.
HENRY ST.
OLIVER ST.
MONROE ST.
WATER ST
.
CATHERINE SLIP
CHERRY ST.
SOUTH ST.
HESTER ST.
FORS
YTH
ST.
BROOME
ELDR
IDG
E ST
.
ORC
HARD
ST.
ALLE
N ST
.
CANAL ST.
FORSYTH ST.
BOW
ERY
CHRY
STIE
ST.
ELIZ
ABET
H ST
.
MO
TT S
T.
DOYER ST
PELL ST.
MUL
BERR
Y ST
.
BAYARD ST.
CHAT
HAM
SQ
PARK R
OW
PEARL ST.
CATHERINE ST.
R F WAGNER PL
MOSCO ST
WORTH ST
JAMES ST
ST.J
AMES
PL.
RIVINGTON ST.
CHRY
STIE
ST.
BOW
ERY
ALLEN STDELANCEY ST
ALLE
N ST
TRYO
N ROW
ROSE
ST
CHUR
CH S
T
CLIFF
ST
FRANKFORT ST
GOLD
ST
SPRUCE ST
PARK R
OW
WIL
LIAM
ST
BEEKMAN ST
NASS
AU S
T
THEA
TRE
AL
ANN ST
FULTON ST
WAT
ER ST
PECK SLIPPECK SLIP
DOVER ST
DEY ST
FULTON ST
VESEY ST
BARCLAY ST
JOHN ST
FRON
T STW
ATER
ST
BEEKMAN ST
PEAR
L ST
PLATT ST
DUTC
H ST
FULTON ST
JOHN ST
LIBE
RTY
PL
LIBERTY ST
MAIDEN LACORTLANDT ST
SOUT
H ST
TRIM
BLE
PL
THOMAS ST
FOLE
Y SQ
BAXT
ER S
T
CENT
RE S
T
WORTH ST
LAFAYETTE ST
HOGAN PL
PEARL ST
W B
ROAD
WAY
AVE OF THE AMERICAS
CANAL ST
LISPENARD ST
WALKER ST
BRO
ADW
AY
WHITE ST
CHUR
CH S
T
FRAN
KLIN
PL
CORT
LAND
T AL
LEONARD ST
FRANKLIN ST
LAFA
YETT
E ST
CHAMBERS ST
READE ST
DUANE ST
AVENUE OF THE FINEST
PARK
ROW
MADISON ST
ELK
ST
REPUBLICAN AL
CHUR
CH S
T
BRO
ADW
AY
PARK PL
MURRAY ST
WARREN ST
PEDE
STRI
AN ST
OME ST
G ST LAFA
YETT
E ST
SPRING ST
CLEV
ELAN
D PL
BROOME ST
WO
OST
ER S
T
SPRING ST
GRE
ENE
ST
GRAND ST
CENT
RE M
ARKE
T PL
KENMARE ST
CRO
SBY
ST
MER
CER
ST
LAFA
YETT
E ST
BRO
ADW
AY
BROOME ST
HOWARD ST
GRAND STCE
NTRE
ST
CANAL ST
CANAL ST
HESTER ST
424
300
152
17821
1258336
379
237113
98170214
336
107
213210
107
11145 660
74316
768
40
74
413
487
419
BOW
ERY
6245
3
29
225
10
50 820
0978
247
104
1078
80
73300 65
189
228
326186
30
331
196
69
176116
517 69
37880
EAST
RIV
ER
BROOKLYN BRIDGE
BENS
ON
PL
CATHERINE LA
24
45
2
457207
211469
22
275
245
627
89
18689 87
3749
119147
73998
118907
624
87
248
89862
38
62196
40
89
163
476
829
640
931
217
907266
758
86180
70223
90
108471 113854908
246
245
611
214
204
159
245
224
9554
6
8169
43 433
28161
1
12088
3
128
24
28
13
52449
18835
997
246
718660
547
127
499
154
791
71 711 233
572229
14
329
87 372
35
17089
9211055
30171
38151
60115
41 312
42863
261
3582767
63769
17654
820
65
0
140
796
243
460
401
106
44146
232 29824
162
548
393
44818
105
NB FDR OFFRAMPDOVER ST
BROOKLYN BR ONRAMPFRANKFORT ST
FDR ONRAMP
15 128
121
41
65207101
1546
8 65
FDR ONRAMP
BROOKLYN BR OFFRAMP
R F WAGNER PL
577
185
1531352 258
64
11
293
253
13911
12
34
123
3295
513
LegendUnsignalized IntersectionsSignalized Intersections
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS
Security Zone
Figure 7-3b2000 Baseline Traffic Volumes - MD Peak Hour
678
400
837
535
271
448
39783
688
19
328
916
26 29046
19401
R F WAGNER PL
BROOKLYN BR OFFRAMP
FDR ONRAMP
108
5637
4322399
6331
03
FDR ONRAMP
FRANKFORT ST
BROOKLYN BR ONRAMP
DOVER ST
NB FDR OFFRAMP465
59110
83
58
169
135
434
107
36914
6
227
53
98259
9
241
327
321
271
86
589
115465
201
166
271
282
565
1711
15896
509
162
2190
30
205
33 142
90510
870
31797
345754
22045
70 763
488
180106
414
149
653
298536
918
84
437
636
25 203
389185
751
40223
232117
1142
10295
4
DIVISION ST.
E. BROADWAY
MARKET ST.
PIKE ST.
HENRY ST.
OLIVER ST.
MONROE ST.
WATER ST
.
CATHERINE SLIP
CHERRY ST.
SOUTH ST.
HESTER ST.
FORS
YTH
ST.
BROOME S
ELDR
IDG
E ST
.
LUDL
OW
ST.
ORC
HARD
ST.
ALLE
N ST
.
CANAL ST.
FORSYTH ST.
BOW
ERY
CHRY
STIE
ST.
ELIZ
ABET
H ST
.
MO
TT S
T.
DOYER ST
PELL ST.
MUL
BERR
Y ST
.
BAYARD ST.
CHAT
HAM
SQ
PARK R
OW
PEARL ST.
CATHERINE ST.
R F WAGNER PL
MOSCO ST
WORTH ST
JAMES ST
ST.J
AMES
PL.
RIVINGTON ST.
CHRY
STIE
ST.
BOW
ERY
FORS
YTH
ST
ALLEN ST
DELANCEY ST
ALLE
N ST
TRYO
N ROW
ROSE
ST
CHUR
CH S
T
CLIFF
ST
FRANKFORT ST
GOLD
ST
SPRUCE ST
PARK R
OW
WIL
LIAM
ST
BEEKMAN ST
NASS
AU S
T
THEA
TRE
AL
ANN ST
FULTON ST
WAT
ER ST
PECK SLIPPECK SLIP
DOVER ST
DEY ST
FULTON ST
VESEY ST
BARCLAY ST
JOHN ST
FRON
T STW
ATER
ST
BEEKMAN ST
PEAR
L ST
PLATT ST
DUTC
H ST
FULTON ST
JOHN ST
LIBE
RTY
PL
LIBERTY ST
MAIDEN LACORTLANDT ST
SOUT
H ST
TRIM
BLE
PL
THOMAS ST
BAXT
ER S
T
CENT
RE S
T
WORTH ST
LAFAYETTE ST
HOGAN PL
PEARL ST
AVE OF THE AMERICAS
CANAL ST
LISPENARD ST
WALKER ST
BRO
ADW
AY
WHITE ST
CHUR
CH S
T
FRAN
KLIN
PL
CORT
LAND
T AL
LEONARD ST
FRANKLIN ST
BENS
ON
PL
CATHERINE LA
LAFA
YETT
E ST
CHAMBERS ST
READE ST
DUANE ST
AVENUE OF THE FINEST
PARK
ROW
MADISON ST
ELK
ST
REPUBLICAN AL
CHUR
CH S
T
BRO
ADW
AY
PARK PL
MURRAY ST
WARREN ST
PEDE
STRI
AN ST
ME ST
G ST LAFA
YETT
E ST
SPRING ST
CLEV
ELAN
D PL
BROOME ST
WO
OST
ER S
T
SPRING ST
GRE
ENE
ST
GRAND ST
CENT
RE M
ARKE
T PL
KENMARE ST
CRO
SBY
ST
MER
CER
ST
LAFA
YETT
E ST
BRO
ADW
AY
BROOME ST
HOWARD ST
GRAND STCE
NTRE
ST
CANAL ST
HESTER ST
443
368
201
15026
0
249376
406
28684
76179228
354
173
231252
336
14926 744
64323
852
29
73
569
727
647
1491296
BOW
ERY
964
41 914
12
302
6
781
50 835
135
117
1097 95
52379 37
262
15
403 163
183
22
357263
43
387223
101
106
558
81
EAST
RIV
ER
BROOKLYN BRIDGE
FOLE
Y SQ
23244
528
9690
08
5
19794
411
14
153896
745
14331
233
45354
42838
6150
113
346
149329
4386
169
123170
75523
86
403
7
274621401
780
87
540
165
133
676
906
42
62939
12
55
26
93
1051
143
736
341
736
292
229825
649101
47961
60 280
93
68667
902
145
657
922
171
98
22
34
33
59
18774
96
62129
321287
89 986060
285
71
1254
307
261802
107
782
4475
51 473
102910
741
55
98
129598
30
2
36226
73249
1080
290
20
5
770
31
6
817
325
212
1175
7
18
18
201
314
LegendUnsignalized IntersectionsSignalized Intersections
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS
Security Zone
Figure 7-3c2000 Baseline Traffic Volumes - PM Peak Hour
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS Chapter 7: Traffic and Parking
7-6
Intersection Capacity Analyses
Methodology
Capacity analyses for the selected intersections were conducted based on the 2000 HighwayCapacity Manual (HCM) methodology, using Version 4.1f of the Highway Capactiy Software(HCS). The traffic data required for these analyses include the volumes on each approach, signaltimings, peak hour factors (PHF), percentage of heavy vehicles, basic roadway geometriesincluding number and width of lanes on each approach, curbside parking usage and various otherphysical and operational characteristics. This methodology provides a volume-to-capacity (v/c)ratio, delay and level of service (LOS) for each signalized intersection approach.
The HCM methodology provides a volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio for each signalized intersectionapproach, representing the ratio of traffic volumes on an approach to its traffic-carrying capacity.A ratio of less than 0.85 is generally considered to be a non-congested condition in Manhattan;when this value increases, congestion increases. At a value of 1.0, the intersection lane groupoperates at or over capacity. This situation is associated with severe traffic flow congestion, withstop-and-start conditions and extensive vehicle queuing and delays.
The HCM procedure also expresses quality of flow at signalized intersections in terms of levelof service, based on the amount of delay experienced by a driver at an intersection. LOS valuesrange from LOS A, with a minimum delay, to LOS F, representing long delays. The followingtable shows the LOS/delay relationship for signalized and unsignalized intersections, using theHCM methodology. Levels of service A, B, and C generally represent extremely favorable to fairlevels of traffic flow; at LOS D the influence of congestion will become noticeable; LOS E isconsidered to be the limit of acceptable delay, and LOS F is considered as unacceptable to mostdrivers. In this traffic study, a signalized lane group operating at LOS E or F is identified ascongested.
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS Chapter 7: Traffic and Parking
7-7
Table 7-1 shows the LOS/delay relationship for signalized and unsignalized intersections usingthe HCM methodology.
Table 7-1Roadway Level of Service Criteria
Signalized Unsignalized
LOS Delay (Seconds) Delay (Seconds)
A 10.0 or less 10.0 or less
B 10.1 to 20.0 10.1 to 15.0
C 20.1 to 35.0 15.1 to 25.0
D 35.1 to 55.0 25.1 to 35.0
E 55.1 to 80.0 35.1 to 50.0
F greater than 80.0 greater than 50.0
Source: 2000 Highway Capacity Manual
Based on the thresholds established for signalized intersections in the CEQR Technical Manual,if a No-Action LOS A, B or C deteriorates to unacceptable mid-LOS D, or a LOS E or F in theWith-Action condition, then a significant traffic impact has occurred. The CEQR TechnicalManual further states that for a No-Action LOS A, B or C, which declines to mid-LOS D orworse under the With-Action condition, mitigation to mid-LOS D is required. For a No-Actionmid-LOS D, an increase of five or more seconds of delay in a lane group in the With-Actioncondition should be considered significant. For No-Action LOS E, an increase in delay of fourseconds of delay should be considered significant. For No-Action LOS F, three seconds of delayshould be considered significant, however, if a No-Action LOS F condition already has delaysin excess of 120 seconds, an increase of 1.0 second in delay should be considered significant,unless the proposed action would generate fewer than five vehicles through that lane group in thepeak hour.
To evaluate current operation conditions in the study area, capacity analyses were performed ateach analyzed intersection utilizing the procedures described above. Table 7-2 summarizes theresults of these analyses at signalized and unsignalized intersections in all peak hours analyzed.The table highlights those intersection movements that operate at LOS E or F or have a high v/cratio (generally 0.90 and above), and are therefore considered to be congested.
Table 7-2: Baseline LOS at Signalized Intersections
SIGNALIZED Lane V/C Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS V/C Delay LOSINTERSECTION Group Ratio (sec/veh) Ratio (sec/veh) Ratio (sec/veh)Bowery Corridor1) Bowery (N-S) @ NB-DefL 0.84 72.9 E * 0.98 95.0 F * 0.89 67.9 E *Kenmare Street (E-W) 2 NB-TR 0.65 29.9 C 0.91 42.3 D * 0.58 26.6 C
SB-Def L 0.84 44.6 D SB-TR 1.04 62.6 E *SB-LTR 1.04 63.9 E * 1.05 65.4 E *EB-LTR 0.39 19.2 B 0.61 25.9 C 0.69 26.0 C WB-L 0.93 57.6 E * 1.04 97.9 F * 0.92 58.1 E *WB-T 0.80 28.2 C 0.55 24.0 C 0.56 22.8 C WB-R 1.02 80.3 F * 0.76 40.0 D 1.04 81.9 F *
2) Bowery (N-S) @ NB-LT 0.73 20.2 C 1.03 55.3 E * 0.88 29.7 C Broome Street (E-W) SB-TR 0.76 20.5 C 0.88 27.1 C 0.86 25.3 C
WB-LTR 0.78 41.1 D 0.75 38.9 D 0.70 36.7 D
3) Bowery (N-S) @ NB-T 0.48 13.8 B 0.78 21.0 C 0.48 13.8 B Grand Street (E-W) NB-R 0.48 18.3 B 1.01 80.1 F * 0.54 21.2 C
SB-TL 0.64 16.8 B 0.71 18.7 B 0.74 19.3 B EB-LTR 0.76 38.3 D 0.75 37.6 D 0.94 60.8 E *
(4) Bowery (N-S) @ NB-T 1.04 85.0 F * 0.85 44.4 D 0.84 42.7 D Canal Street (E-W) 2 SB-L 0.48 38.2 D 0.56 23.9 C 1.00 62.7 E *
SB-LTR 1.04 72.2 E * 1.01 60.1 E * 0.71 29.5 C EB-T 1.05 56.9 E * 1.00 56.4 E * 1.03 56.3 E *
EB-R 0.33 15.0 B 0.64 30.7 C 0.15 14.1 B WB-LTR 0.59 16.9 B 0.86 36.6 D 0.30 15.4 B
5) Bowery (N-S) @ NB-T 0.58 20.9 C 0.69 23.2 C 0.66 22.5 C Division Street (E-W) NB-R 0.05 14.6 B 0.32 20.0 C 0.09 15.3 B
SB-LT 0.56 20.7 C 0.64 22.2 C 0.41 18.1 B EB-LTR 0.00 32.9 C 0.06 33.8 C 0.07 34.1 C WB-T 0.64 40.7 D 0.70 43.4 D 0.81 51.0 D WB-R 0.53 21.3 C 0.75 28.7 C 1.03 64.1 E *
6) Chatham Square (N-S) @ NB-T 0.40 9.8 A 0.47 10.5 B 0.36 9.3 A East Broadway (E-W) NB-R 0.99 62.0 E * 0.74 26.2 C 0.81 30.6 C
SB-L 0.93 52.8 D * 1.01 65.6 E * 0.96 63.7 E *SB-T 0.26 8.5 A 0.29 8.7 A 0.25 8.3 A WB-L 0.82 49.6 D 0.33 28.1 C 0.40 29.0 C WB-R 0.25 28.5 C 0.47 34.7 C 0.59 39.0 D
(7) Park Row (N-S) @ NB-LTR 0.65 29.7 C 0.56 27.9 C 0.53 23.5 C Mott Street (SB) SB-L 1.02 100.7 F * 1.03 104.5 F * 0.83 57.5 E *Worth Street (E-W) 2 SB-TR 1.02 74.2 E * 1.01 77.6 E * 1.05 82.3 F *
EB-DefL 1.01 105.7 F * 0.63 33.6 C 1.05 97.5 F *EB-TR 0.26 23.1 C 0.41 26.7 C 0.25 23.7 C WB-LT 0.21 21.7 C 0.22 22.0 C 0.13 21.6 C WB-R 0.91 60.8 E * 1.04 86.4 F * 0.97 70.9 E *
Mott Street SB-LTR 0.77 63.3 E * 0.22 21.6 C 1.01 116.3 F *
Sources1 Pre-9/11/01 Signal Timing Provided by NYCDOT2 Estimated Signal Timing for Pre-9/11/01 Conditions
NOTES:EB-Eastbound, WB-Westbound, NB-Northbound, SB-SouthboundL-Left, T-Through, R-Right, DfL-Analysis considers a Defacto Left Lane on this approach .V/C Ratio - Volume to Capacity Ratio, SEC/VEH - Seconds per vehicleLOS - Level of serviceAppr - Approach
Baseline PM Peak HourBaseline AM Peak Hour Baseline Midday Peak Hour
Table 7-2: Baseline LOS at Signalized Intersections
SIGNALIZED Lane V/C Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS V/C Delay LOSINTERSECTION Group Ratio (sec/veh) Ratio (sec/veh) Ratio (sec/veh)
Baseline PM Peak HourBaseline AM Peak Hour Baseline Midday Peak Hour
Broadway Corridor(8) Broadway (SB) SB-LTR 0.77 30.2 C 0.71 27.0 C 0.71 28.3 C Canal Street (E-W) EB-LTR 0.87 33.7 C 0.87 33.8 C 0.75 27.9 C
WB-LTR 0.93 30.2 C * 0.99 45.9 D * WB-DefL 0.43 28.1 C WB-T 0.42 13.5 B
(9) Broadway (SB) @ SB-LTR 0.57 16.9 B 0.49 12.4 B 0.54 16.7 B Worth Street (E-W) 1 EB-TR 0.62 27.4 C 0.51 24.3 C 0.56 25.0 C
WB-L 0.48 29.5 C 0.40 25.8 C 0.35 24.5 C WB-T 0.71 30.2 C 0.55 25.1 C 0.54 24.5 C
10) Broadway (N-S) @ SB-T 0.79 21.6 C 0.57 11.7 B 0.59 16.1 B Thomas Street (E-W) SB-R 0.10 11.1 B 0.07 7.5 A 0.15 12.2 B
(11) Broadway (SB) @ SB-LT 0.81 25.1 C 0.59 14.7 B 0.68 20.5 C Duane Street (EB) EB-T 0.37 21.6 C 0.35 21.1 C 0.53 24.2 C
EB-R 0.31 21.9 C 0.39 23.9 C 0.22 19.7 B
(12) Broadway (SB) @ SB-LT 0.79 24.6 C 0.63 15.8 B 0.81 25.7 C Chambers Street (E-W) 1 SB-R 0.13 13.6 B 0.15 14.1 B 0.11 13.4 B
EB-TR 0.68 28.5 C 0.85 42.3 D 0.70 28.9 C WB-LT 0.96 53.0 D * 0.73 30.3 C 1.04 76.6 E *
(13) Broadway (SB) @ SB-T 0.61 23.2 C 0.45 20.6 C 0.60 23.0 C Barclay Street (E-W) SB-R 0.49 26.1 C 0.26 20.3 C 0.32 21.7 C
WB-L 1.03 101.8 F * 0.72 52.7 D 0.98 91.0 F *WB-LT 1.02 78.1 E * 0.82 43.4 D 1.00 69.1 E *
(14) Broadway (SB) @ SB-L 0.45 19.6 B 0.74 24.8 C 0.89 39.6 D Vesey/Ann Street (EB) SB-LT 0.62 20.9 C 0.30 13.9 B 0.38 17.3 B
EB-TR 0.83 29.6 C 0.63 22.2 C 0.73 24.6 C
(15) Broadway (SB) @ SB-TR 0.55 11.2 B 0.33 5.0 A 0.37 9.2 A Fulton Street (WB) WB-LT 0.40 28.1 C 0.30 26.6 C 0.35 27.3 C
Canal Corridor16) Lafayette Street (N-S) @ SB-L 0.49 36.7 D 0.40 32.9 C 0.56 39.9 D Canal Street (E-W) SB-T 0.66 36.7 D 0.56 33.0 C 0.73 40.6 D
SB-R 1.02 100.9 F * 0.58 42.0 D 0.40 33.9 C EB-TR 0.71 21.7 C 0.72 21.8 C 0.59 19.1 B WB-LT 0.78 16.4 B 0.54 11.3 B 0.39 9.6 A
17) Centre Street (N-S) @ NB-LT 1.02 68.5 E * 0.87 49.9 D 0.91 49.0 D *Canal Street (E-W) 2 NB-R 0.35 29.4 C 0.24 32.0 C 0.40 32.4 C
EB-DefL 0.86 60.8 E * 0.71 36.2 D 0.62 25.8 C EB-T 0.59 13.2 B 1.04 56.7 E * 0.50 10.9 B WB-TR 1.02 54.3 D * 1.00 53.8 D * 0.49 19.4 B
18) Mulberry Street (N-S) @ NB-LTR 0.86 66.6 E * 0.56 31.0 C 0.79 43.5 D Canal Street (E-W) 2 EB-LT 1.04 56.9 E * 0.91 28.5 C * 0.99 41.8 D *
WB-TR 1.00 37.4 D * 0.86 25.4 C 0.43 13.1 B
Sources1 Pre-9/11/01 Signal Timing Provided by NYCDOT2 Estimated Signal Timing for Pre-9/11/01 Conditions
NOTES:EB-Eastbound, WB-Westbound, NB-Northbound, SB-SouthboundL-Left, T-Through, R-Right, DfL-Analysis considers a Defacto Left Lane on this approach .V/C Ratio - Volume to Capacity Ratio, SEC/VEH - Seconds per vehicleLOS - Level of serviceAppr - Approach
Table 7-2: Baseline LOS at Signalized Intersections
SIGNALIZED Lane V/C Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS V/C Delay LOSINTERSECTION Group Ratio (sec/veh) Ratio (sec/veh) Ratio (sec/veh)
Baseline PM Peak HourBaseline AM Peak Hour Baseline Midday Peak Hour
Centre Corridor(19) Centre Street (N-S) @ NB-L 1.04 72.9 E * 0.90 51.4 D * 1.01 62.6 E *Chambers Street (EB) 1,2 NB-LT 1.05 66.8 E * 0.79 31.5 C 0.92 45.7 D *
SB-TR 0.43 19.4 B 0.47 20.8 C 0.86 32.2 C EB-R 0.58 27.8 C 0.36 16.2 B 0.56 19.2 B
20) Centre Street (N-S) @ SB-L 0.47 9.6 A 0.65 13.1 B 0.96 35.7 D *Tryon Row - Brooklyn Bridge (E-W) SB-LT 0.49 10.1 B 0.27 7.6 A 0.70 14.6 B
Church Corridor(21) Church Street (NB) @ NB-T 0.70 19.5 B 0.53 12.8 B 0.56 16.8 B Fulton Street (WB) WB-R 0.90 55.9 E * 0.58 30.8 C 0.67 34.2 C
(22) Church Street (NB) @ NB-LT 0.75 18.5 B 0.43 9.0 A 0.52 14.0 B Vesey Street (EB) NB-R 0.50 16.4 B 0.58 14.0 B 0.60 18.4 B
EB-LT 0.84 35.3 D 0.52 25.5 C 0.60 26.9 C
(23) Church Street (NB) @ NB-LT 0.54 11.6 D 0.42 12.7 B 0.43 12.8 DBarclay Street (WB) WB-TR 0.48 24.6 C 0.41 23.5 C 0.51 25.0 C
(24) Church Street (NB) NB-LTR 0.99 44.5 D * 0.76 21.0 C 0.81 26.1 C Chambers Street (E-W) 1 EB-LT 0.71 26.8 C 0.63 24.3 C 0.64 24.0 C
WB-TR 0.77 30.1 C 0.58 22.1 C 0.60 22.5 C
(25) Church Street (NB) NB-LTR 0.86 22.4 C 0.64 11.5 B 0.63 15.6 B Worth Street (E-W) 1 EB-LT 0.43 24.6 C 0.35 23.3 C 0.29 22.2 C
WB-TR 0.98 66.3 E * 0.89 51.5 D 0.72 33.9 C
Division Corridor26) Pike Street (N-S) @ NB-LT 0.58 14.2 B 0.44 12.1 B 0.71 16.9 B Division Street (E-W) SB-T 0.34 10.9 B 0.37 11.1 B 0.35 10.9 B
SB-R 0.62 20.3 C 0.67 22.3 C 0.58 18.5 B WB-LTR 0.27 24.6 C 0.51 30.4 C 0.57 31.7 C
East Broadway Corridor27) Forsyth Street (N-S) @ SB-LR 0.68 40.4 D 0.52 32.1 C 0.49 31.2 C East Broadway (E-W) EB-LT 0.67 16.7 B 0.34 9.7 A 0.31 9.4 A
WB-TR 0.35 9.9 A 0.26 9.0 A 0.40 10.4 B
28) Market Street (N-S) @ NB-LTR 0.86 48.9 D 0.80 44.1 D 0.47 14.8 B East Broadway (E-W) EB-LT 0.90 37.8 D * 0.37 12.6 B 0.91 50.8 D *
WB-TR 0.71 21.4 C 0.54 16.1 B 1.03 79.0 E *
Frankfort Corridor(29) Madison/Gold St (N-S) @ NB-T 0.00 25.7 C 0.00 28.0 C 0.00 26.5 CFrankfort Street (E-W) 2 EB-TR 1.04 84.2 D 0.98 63.6 E 1.03 79.2 E
WB-L 0.50 33.7 D 0.75 47.2 D 0.73 48.8 DWB-T 0.10 26.8 D 0.03 26.0 C 0.06 26.4 C
30) Park Row (N-S) @ NB-T 0.37 13.9 B 0.37 13.8 B 0.42 14.3 B Beekman Street (E-W) SB-T 0.34 13.4 B 0.27 12.7 B 0.32 13.2 B
WB-LR 0.68 30.6 C 0.64 28.9 C 0.78 35.4 D
31) Park Row (N-S) @ NB-TR 0.43 9.9 A 0.44 9.9 A 0.74 15.3 B Spruce Street (E-W) SB-L 0.57 8.8 A 0.46 5.2 A 0.60 17.9 B
SB-T 0.43 10.1 B 0.36 9.3 A 0.44 10.1 B
Sources1 Pre-9/11/01 Signal Timing Provided by NYCDOT2 Estimated Signal Timing for Pre-9/11/01 Conditions
NOTES:EB-Eastbound, WB-Westbound, NB-Northbound, SB-SouthboundL-Left, T-Through, R-Right, DfL-Analysis considers a Defacto Left Lane on this approach .V/C Ratio - Volume to Capacity Ratio, SEC/VEH - Seconds per vehicleLOS - Level of serviceAppr - Approach
Table 7-2: Baseline LOS at Signalized Intersections
SIGNALIZED Lane V/C Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS V/C Delay LOSINTERSECTION Group Ratio (sec/veh) Ratio (sec/veh) Ratio (sec/veh)
Baseline PM Peak HourBaseline AM Peak Hour Baseline Midday Peak Hour
Pearl Corridor(32) Pearl Street (N-S) @ NB-LT 1.01 54.1 D * 0.74 23.3 C 0.94 38.8 D *Fulton Street (E-W) SB-T 0.49 17.4 B 0.59 19.2 B 0.64 20.5 C
SB-R 0.08 12.3 B 0.13 12.8 B 0.08 11.9 B EB-LR 1.01 94.7 F * 0.66 43.3 D 0.47 33.6 C
NB-DefL 0.69 24.9 C (33) Pearl Street (N-S) @ NB-LTR 1.03 59.6 E * 0.59 16.3 B NB-TR 0.68 20.1 C Frankfort/Dover St. (E-W) 2 SB-LTR 0.61 17.0 B 0.50 14.3 B 0.71 19.6 B
EB-L 1.00 79.7 E * 0.99 69.5 E * 1.02 81.5 F *EB-LTR 1.00 77.0 E * 0.99 75.7 E * 1.02 83.3 F *WB-LTR 0.52 26.6 C 0.12 20.6 C 0.37 22.7 C
(34) Pearl Street (N-S) @ NB-LTR 0.89 36.6 D 0.62 24.8 C 0.67 24.3 C Avenue of the Finest (E-W) 2 SB-LTR 0.57 23.0 C 0.39 20.5 C 0.46 20.5 C
EB-LTR 0.95 67.3 E * 1.00 78.9 E * 0.82 48.0 D WB-L 0.79 44.4 D 0.84 49.4 D 0.86 49.7 D WB-TR 0.46 37.5 D 0.06 30.4 C 0.31 33.9 C WB-R 0.41 17.7 B 0.16 13.2 B 0.57 41.3 D
(35) St. James (N-S) @ NB-DefL 0.70 20.9 C 0.86 35.9 D Pearl St. (E-W) 1 NB-T 0.94 39.0 D * NB-LT 0.62 14.6 B 0.55 13.7 B
SB-TR 0.27 9.5 A 0.21 8.9 A 0.23 9.1 A EB-LR 0.06 23.6 C 0.04 23.2 C 0.06 23.4 C
St. James Corridor(36) St. James (N-S) @ NB-LTR 0.86 35.3 D 0.52 20.3 C 0.58 21.6 C Madison St. (E-W) 1 SB-LTR 0.51 21.1 C 0.46 20.0 B 0.33 17.6 B
EB-LTR 0.04 14.3 B 0.05 14.4 B 0.09 14.9 B WB-LTR 0.17 15.4 B 0.15 15.2 B 0.26 16.4 B
Worth Street Corridor(37) Centre Street (NB) @ NB-L 1.04 69.3 E * 1.01 63.3 E * 1.04 73.1 E *Worth Street (E-W) 1,2 NB-TR 0.54 9.6 A 0.42 9.7 A 0.43 10.2 B
EB-LT 0.80 51.3 D 0.89 55.6 E * 0.80 43.6 D WB-TR 0.89 63.3 E * 0.82 50.8 D 0.67 38.2 D
(38) Lafayette Street (SB) @ SB-LTR 0.19 15.5 B 0.33 16.9 B 0.36 17.3 B Worth Street (E-W) 1 EB-TR 0.34 17.2 B 0.31 16.9 B 0.40 18.0 B
WB-L 0.68 33.7 C 0.89 57.0 E * 1.00 81.5 F *WB-T 0.79 31.4 C 0.58 22.9 C 0.58 22.6 C
Table 7-2: Baseline LOS at Unsignalized Intersections
UNSIGNALIZED V/C Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS V/C Delay LOSINTERSECTION Ratio (sec/veh) Ratio (sec/veh) Ratio (sec/veh)Baxter Corridor1) Baxter Street (N-S) @ EB-TR 0.51 24.8 C 0.82 44.5 E * 0.98 69.1 F *Walker Street (E-W)
(2) Baxter Street (NB) @ SB-LR 0.08 11.9 B 0.08 12.6 B 0.0 12.2 B Worth Street (E-W)
Sources1 Pre-9/11/01 Signal Timing Provided by NYCDOT2 Estimated Signal Timing for Pre-9/11/01 Conditions
NOTES:EB-Eastbound, WB-Westbound, NB-Northbound, SB-SouthboundL-Left, T-Through, R-Right, DfL-Analysis considers a Defacto Left Lane on this approach .V/C Ratio - Volume to Capacity Ratio, SEC/VEH - Seconds per vehicleLOS - Level of serviceAppr - Approach
Baseline AM Peak Hour Baseline Midday Peak Hour Baseline PM Peak Hour
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS Chapter 7: Traffic and Parking
7-8
Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections
Along Bowery, the intersection at Kenmare Street has at least four congested intersections in allthree peak periods, while there is one congested approach during the midday peak period atBroome Street and one congested approach at Grand Street during the midday and PM peakhours. Additionally, at least one approach at Canal, East Broadway, and Worth Street arecongested in each peak hour. Also, at the intersection of Bowery and Division Street, oneapproach is congested in the PM peak hour.
At the intersection of Broadway and Canal Street, one congested movement was present in theAM and midday peak hours while at Broadway and Chambers Street and Broadway and BarclayStreet, there was at least one congested approach in both AM and PM peak periods. Along CanalStreet, there was at least one congested approach in all three peak periods at Centre Street andMulberry Street while there was one congested approach at Lafayette Street during the AM peakperiod.
At Centre Street and Chambers Street at least one approach was congested in each peak hour.Along the Church Street corridor, at the western edge of the study area, one congested approachwas observed during the AM peak period at Fulton Street, Chambers Street, and Worth Street.At Market Street and East Broadway, one approach was congested during the AM peak hourwhile two approaches were congested during the PM peak period.
On the southeastern edge of the study area, the intersection of Pearl Street and Fulton Streetexperienced two congested approaches during the AM peak period and one during the PM peakperiod. At Pearl Street and Frankfort Street at least two approaches were congested during eachpeak hour while one approach was congested during the AM and midday peak periods at PearlStreet and Avenue of the Finest. At Pearl Street and St. James Street, one approach wascongested during the AM Peak hour.
At Worth Street and Centre Street, all three peak periods have at least one congested approachwhile at Worth Street and Lafayette Street, the midday and PM peak periods have one congestedapproach. At the unsignalized intersection of Baxter Street and Walker Street, on approach wascongested in the midday and PM peak periods.
Parking
The information presented here was assembled from various sources including the 1993 FoleySquare Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), the 2004 World Trade Center Memorialand Redevelopment Plan Generic Impact Statement (GEIS), the 2001 Public Safety AnswerCenter Environmental Assessment Statement (EAS), and the 2000 Department of City Planning’sParking Guide.
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS Chapter 7: Traffic and Parking
7-9
Off-Street Parking
Prior to September 11, 2001, there were 41 identified off-street parking facilities within a quarter-mile radius of the security zone area. This public parking facility inventory is provided in Table7-3. Figure 7-4 depicts the location of each of the identified public parking facilities.
Parking facility occupancy data was available for midday (between 11:30 AM and 1:30 PM) ona typical weekday, with capacities ranging from 9- to 400-vehicle range.
As shown in Table 7-3, pre-September 11, 2001 parking utilization data was not available for allgarages within the study area. An average of the known pre-September 11, 2001 utilization rateswas applied to the total capacity. As such, as shown in Table 7-3, the public parking facilitiessurveyed contained over 4,711 spaces, with an estimated occupancy level of about 88 percent atmidday. This means that there were 566 unoccupied spaces available within off-street parkingfacilities under baseline conditions.
As shown in Table 7-3, the municipal parking garage (No. 41) located at 109 Park Row had acapacity of 400 spaces with a low midday utilization of 68% with 129 spaces available to thepublic during this time.
On-Street Parking
Data regarding on-street parking regulations was also obtained from the studies mentioned above.Legal on-street parking in this area was very limited. Overall, within the parking study area,there was a relatively limited number of legal parking spaces available on-street for use bymotorists. The limited number of spaces is due to the minimal width of the east/west cross streetsand truck delivery activities which occur throughout the day. In addition, as this area has a highconcentration of government facilities, the limited number of legal parking spaces are also dueto the large number of curbside parking spaces reserved for government officials.
Within the study area, no parking except for authorized vehicles was allowed along Broadway,Church Street and Worth Street. No parking was allowed throughout the day on both the northand south side of Chambers Street. Parking on Duane, Reade, Lafayette and Centre Streets, andPearl Street between Centre Street and Cardinal Hayes Place was restricted to authorized vehiclesonly.
Illegal curbside parking and standing were prevalent throughout the study area. Illegal parkingand standing along the study area roadways for either a short- or long-term period impeded trafficflow and reduced available capacity. However, specific quantitative pre-September 11, 2001 on-street parking capacity and utilization data are not available for the study area.
No. Operator Address CapacityMD (12-1)
Util.Spaces Avail.
1 Edison NY Parking LLC 174 Centre Street 93 n/a n/a2 Kennee Parking Corp 114-116 Mulberry Street 42 n/a n/a3 Chung Pak Parking Corp 95-97 1/2 Baxter Street 28 n/a n/a4 Chinatown Parking Corp 88 Walker Street 35 n/a n/a5 Champion Tribeca LLC 411-413 Broadway 60 n/a n/a6 Margaret E Pescatore 98-100 Bayard Street 12 n/a n/a7 Champion Mulberry LLC 62-64 Mulberry Street 191 n/a n/a8 SSL Franklin St Parking Lot Inc 48-52 Franklin Street 40 n/a n/a9 (name unknown) 341 Broadway 150 93% 1010 (name unknown) 84 Leonard Street 54 93% 411 Katz Parking Systems 130 Duane Street 40 63% 1512 Kids Parking Corp 105 Duane Street 72 100% 013 Cobalt Car Park LLC 108 Leonard Street 150 93% 1014 RAEM 93 Chambers Street 48 n/a n/a15 BGB Parking System 6 Barclay Street 86 100% 016 Central Parking System of NY 47 Church Street 65 n/a n/a17 25-27 Beekman Street Associates 25-27 Beekman Street 149 100% 018 John Street Parking 57-61 Ann Street 276 n/a n/a19 Central Parking Systems Inc 169 William Street 50 100% 020 NYU Downtown Hospital 170 Williams Street 144 100% 021 Ropetmar Garage Inc 80 Gold Street 351 100% 022 Ropetmar Garage Inc 299 Pearl Street 310 95% 1523 Allright Parking Management Corp 10-12 Peck Slip 105 77% 2424 Edison Lafayette Corp 300-302 Pearl Street 25 76% 625 Edison Lafayette Corp 288-294 Pearl Street 36 78% 826 Downtown Parking Corp 56 Fulton Street 280 n/a n/a27 320 Pearl Street Realty LLC 322 Pearl Street 31 81% 628 Edison Lafayette Corp 228-232 Water Street 120 77% 2829 (name unknown) 88 Madison Street 50 n/a n/a30 (name unknown) 31 Monroe Street 110 n/a n/a31 (name unknown) 38 Henry Street 150 n/a n/a32 (name unknown) 2 Division Street 300 n/a n/a33 (name unknown) 79 Division Street 9 n/a n/a34 (name unknown) 38 Bowery 140 n/a n/a35 (name unknown) 44 Elizabeth Street 150 n/a n/a36 Chatham Parking Systems Inc 180 Park Row 130 85% 2037 (name unknown) 26 Forsyth Street 42 n/a n/a38 (name unknown) 58 Walker Street 40 n/a n/a39 (name unknown) 49-59 Henry Street 102 n/a n/a40 Municipal Lot Leonard St & Lafayette St 45 100% 041 Department of Transportation 109 Park Row 400 68% 129
4,711 88% 566Sources: World Trade Center Memorial and Redevelopment Plan FEIS (2004), Public Safety Answering Center II EAS (2001),
Parking Guide to New York City (March 2000), 48-52 Franklin Street EAS (2000)
and Estimated Weekday UtilizationTable 7-3: Pre-9/11/01 Off-Street Parking Facilities within 1/4-mile of the Security Zone
Total
BOW
ERY
HESTER ST
ELIZ
ABET
H ST
MO
TT S
T
MUL
BERR
Y ST
CANAL ST
CANAL ST
BAXT
ER S
T
CENT
RE S
T
GRAND ST
HOWARD ST
BRO
ADW
AY
LAFA
YETT
E ST
MER
CER
ST CRO
SBY
ST
CEN
TRE
GRAND ST
GRE
ENE
ST
WO
OST
ER S
T
W B
ROAD
WAY
PEDE
STRI
AN S
T
WARREN ST
MURRAY ST
PARK PL
BRO
ADW
AY
CHUR
CH S
T
MAN
HATT
AN A
L
REPUBLICAN AL
ELK
ST
CENT
RE S
T
MADISON ST
CARD
INAL H
AYES P
LPAR
K ROW
AVENUE OF THE FINEST
DUANE ST
READE ST
CHAMBERS ST
LAFA
YETT
E ST
CATHERINE LA
BENS
ON
PL
FRANKLIN ST
LEONARD ST
CORT
LAND
T AL
FRAN
KLIN
PL
CHUR
CH S
T
WHITE ST
BRO
ADW
AY
WALKER ST
LISPENARD ST
CANAL ST
AVE OF THE AMERICAS
W B
ROAD
WAY
PEARL ST
HOGAN PL BAXTER ST
POLI
CE P
Z
LAFA
YETT
E ST
WORTH ST
CENT
RE S
T
BAXT
ER S
T
FOLE
Y SQ
THOMAS ST
TRIM
BLE
PL
SOUT
H ST
CORTLANDT ST MAIDEN LA
LIBE
RTY
PL
JOHN ST
FULTON ST
DUTC
H ST
PLATT ST
RYDE
RS A
L
PEAR
L ST
BEEKMAN ST
WAT
ER S
T
FRON
T ST
BARCLAY ST
VESEY ST
FULTON ST
DEY ST
DOVER ST
PECK SLIP
PECK SLIP
ROBERT F WAGNER SR PL
WAT
ER S
T
FULTON ST
ANN ST
THEA
TRE
AL
NASS
AU S
T
BEEKMAN ST
WIL
LIAM
ST
PARK R
OW
SPRUCE ST
GO
LD S
T
PACE
PZ
FRANKFORT ST
FRANKFORT ST
CLIFF
ST
CHUR
CH S
T
BROOKLYN BRIDGE
EAST
RIV
ER
ROSE
ST
TRYON ROW
ALLE
N ST
ALLEN ST
ST.JA
MES
PL. JAMES STBA
XTER
ST
THOMAS PAINE ST.
MOSCO ST
R F WAGNER PL
CATHERINE ST.
PEAR
L ST
.
PEARL ST.
PARK R
OW
CHAT
HAM
SQ
BAYARD ST.
MUL
BERR
Y ST
.
PELL ST.
DOYER ST
MO
TT S
T.
ELIZ
ABET
H ST
.
GRAND ST.
CHRY
STIE
ST.
HESTER ST.
BOW
ERY
FORSYTH ST.
CANAL ST.
ALLE
N ST
.
ORC
HARD
ST.
LUDL
OW
ST.
ELDR
IDGE
ST.
FORS
YTH
ST.
HESTER ST.
SOUTH ST.
CHERRY ST.
CATHERINE SLIP
MARKET SLIP
WATER ST.
MONROE ST.
OLIVER ST.CATHERINE ST
HENRY ST.PIKE ST.
MARKET ST.
E. BROADWAY
DIVISION ST.
BROOKLYN BRIDGE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
910
11
12
13
14
15
1617
18
19
20
21
22
23242825
26
27
2930
31
32
33
34
35
36
3738
39
40
41
TRIBECA
SOUTHSTREETSEAPORT
CIVICCENTER
CHINATOWN
Figure 7-4Pre 9-11-01 Off-Street Parking Facilities
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS
Security Zone
Legend1 / 4 Mile BoundaryPre-9 / 11 Off-Street Public Parking Facility1
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS Chapter 7: Traffic and Parking
7-10
C. 2006 NO-ACTION CONDITION
Vehicular Traffic
The initial traffic capacity analysis using the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) wasperformed on the 2006 No-Action condition. Under this condition, the security zone installedby NYPD after 9/11 would not be in place and traffic flow patterns, including the four bus routesdiscussed above, would be maintained. However, while most of the patterns would bemaintained, as discussed above, the actual traffic volumes would be different (sometimesmeasurably) from those documented in the baseline conditions. Figure 7-5 provides theestimated 2006 No-Action traffic volumes in the study area. These traffic volumes reflectphysical and land use changes that have occurred independent of the action. Generally, whencompared to the baseline conditions, traffic in much of the network has declined due to lowerdemand and/or shifted demand due to street configuration changes, the absence of portions ofVesey Street, the security plans for 26 Federal Plaza and for the NYSE, and other roadwaychanges. There have also been traffic demand changes due to loss of office space, conversionof office to residential space, declining employment in certain sections of Chinatown and othersocioeconomic variations. Under 2006 No-Action conditions, however, all bus routes would bemaintained on Park Row as in the baseline condition, except for the M9 which is assumed toremain on its present “diverted” route to/from Battery Park City.
Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections
Table 7- 4 shows the results of the 2006 No-Action capacity analysis at the 38 signalized and 2unsignalized intersections studied for the weekday AM, midday and PM peak hours. The tableshows the v/c ratio, delay and level of service (LOS) for each intersection movement in eachanalyzed peak hour. It should be noted that signal timing plans currently in effect (2006 Actionconditions) have been used for the 2006 No-Action condition for all intersections.
Table 7-4 shows that in the 2006 No-Action condition, 15 signalized intersections wouldexperience congestion on one or more approaches in the AM peak hour, 8 in the midday, and 13in the PM peak hour. In the 2006 No-Action condition, there would be several signalizedintersections with one or more movements with a v/c ratio of 0.90 or greater. In the AM peakhour, there would be 14 such movements, in the midday peak hour there would be 7 suchmovements, and in the PM peak hour there would be 13 such movements.
As shown in Table 7-4, of the two unsignalized intersections analyzed, the intersection of Baxterand Walker Streets was found to experience congestion in the PM peak hour in the 2006 No-Action conditions.
422
225379
1604792 51
23
10224
101
685
R F WAGNER PL
BROOKLYN BR OFFRAMP
FDR ONRAMP
27
8440
433
6320177
987415
623
FDR ONRAMP
FRANKFORT ST
BROOKLYN BR ONRAMP
DOVER ST
NB FDR OFFRAMP
521
179
3103180
3563
359
35
35
30
30
154
75
5040
0
228145
78
101
18128
920
9296
17
123
405
21963
210
1545 320
17
89
345
345
00
0
4322
320
9
85598
573
509
193
43284
295389651
60256
60286
2971
117
30187
36380
63
184
17
241693
260
423
70
945
184
244
88
402
10471085
260
1229
558
14
25127
2
24
16
154
0106
36
236
245
6851
616
7
288
41
7570
52011
1
80 513
165
249
6047
19033
452
115
36 70
5 192
38 166
69450
516
100
829
392158
265952
8549
80 1005
160
7728
320
171
1008
292343
1207
99
348
770
47 164
503114
830
30166
224177
1076
6058
234920
921106
941112
155
278
42
53931
46
DIVISION ST.
E. BROADWAY
MARKET ST.
PIKE ST.
HENRY ST.
OLIVER ST.
MONROE ST.
WATER ST
.
CATHERINE SLIP
CHERRY ST.
SOUTH ST.
HESTER ST.
FORS
YTH
ST.
BROOME
ELDR
IDG
E ST
.
ORC
HARD
ST.
ALLE
N ST
.
CANAL ST.
FORSYTH ST.
BOW
ERY
CHRY
STIE
ST.
ELIZ
ABET
H ST
.
MO
TT S
T.
DOYER ST
PELL ST.
MUL
BERR
Y ST
.
BAYARD ST.
CHAT
HAM
SQ
PARK R
OW
PEARL ST.
CATHERINE ST.
R F WAGNER PL
MOSCO ST
WORTH ST
JAMES ST
ST.J
AMES
PL.
RIVINGTON ST.
CHRY
STIE
ST.
BOW
ERY
ALLEN ST
DELANCEY ST
ALLE
N ST
TRYO
N ROW
ROSE
ST
CHUR
CH S
T
CLIFF
ST
FRANKFORT ST
GOLD
ST
SPRUCE ST
PARK R
OW
WIL
LIAM
ST
BEEKMAN ST
NASS
AU S
T
THEA
TRE
AL
ANN ST
FULTON ST
WAT
ER ST
PECK SLIPPECK SLIP
DOVER ST
DEY ST
FULTON ST
VESEY ST
BARCLAY ST
JOHN ST
FRON
T STW
ATER
ST
BEEKMAN ST
PEAR
L ST
PLATT ST
DUTC
H ST
FULTON ST
JOHN ST
LIBE
RTY
PL
LIBERTY ST
MAIDEN LACORTLANDT ST
SOUT
H ST
TRIM
BLE
PL
THOMAS ST
FOLE
Y SQ
BAXT
ER S
T
CENT
RE S
T
WORTH ST
LAFAYETTE ST
HOGAN PL
PEARL ST
AVE OF THE AMERICAS
CANAL ST
LISPENARD ST
WALKER ST
BRO
ADW
AY
WHITE ST
CHUR
CH S
T
FRAN
KLIN
PL
CORT
LAND
T AL
LEONARD ST
FRANKLIN ST
LAFA
YETT
E ST
CHAMBERS ST
READE ST
DUANE ST
AVENUE OF THE FINEST
PARK
ROW
MADISON ST
ELK
ST
REPUBLICAN AL
CHUR
CH S
T
BRO
ADW
AY
PARK PL
MURRAY ST
WARREN ST
PEDE
STRI
AN ST
OME ST
G ST LAFA
YETT
E ST
SPRING ST
CLEV
ELAN
D PL
BROOME ST
WO
OST
ER S
T
SPRING ST
GRE
ENE
ST
GRAND ST
CENT
RE M
ARKE
T PL
KENMARE ST
CRO
SBY
ST
MER
CER
ST
LAFA
YETT
E ST
BRO
ADW
AY
BROOME ST
HOWARD ST
GRAND STCE
NTRE
ST
CANAL ST
CANAL ST
HESTER ST
312
351
223
282
18010
4
114
196
361
132101
1896
523
67
407
91
50108
151
5036 712
80365
830
80
118
450
586
512
1301017
180
BOW
ERY
1122
493
31 194
5
313
556
360
135
39 907
1081052
165
43
9910
2657
83356 65
162
13
16347
20
102066
98
55 1020
110848
107826
231001
52 432940
121
106
637
69
166
10
218 127
27
150407
310
63
14
169
25
190252
166
126
22
EAST
RIV
ER
BROOKLYN BRIDGE
BENS
ON
PL
CATHERINE LA
475
137
282
255
12
Figure 7-5a2006 No-Action Traffic Volumes - AM Peak Hour
Security Zone
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS
Analyzed Intersections (Signalized)Analyzed Intersections (Unsignalized)
Legend
262
310
1835297
1535
1220510
R F WAGNER PL
BROOKLYN BR OFFRAMP
FDR ONRAMP
65
4820
611
4116636
3911
612
114
FDR ONRAMP
FRANKFORT ST
BROOKLYN BR ONRAMP
DOVER ST
NB FDR OFFRAMP
212
2489302
2643
40
40
107
37
94
30
89
104
24129
122
7375
22
72
21394
147
1440 117 17
114
131
131
014
0
39403
393
10
45554
545
5825
170
49334
27934
9653
36291
63269
4992
79
67128
21266
62
295
9
158474211
493
59
503
168
182
123
349
503547
172
645
549
30
39836
11
50
11
76
0131
229
101
115
474
117
343
38
6489
60910
4
123
274
130
144
418
18214
331
61
21 61
38
130
67 154
81345
474
69
782
303147
248854
40115
98 790
157
6130
329
130
827
330361
956
49
216
781
37 150
413114
789
30187
110105
1092
9469
214790
63283
58943
75 184
61
61633
41
DIVISION ST.
E. BROADWAY
MARKET ST.
PIKE ST.
HENRY ST.
OLIVER ST.
MONROE ST.
WATER ST
.
CATHERINE SLIP
CHERRY ST.
SOUTH ST.
HESTER ST.
FORS
YTH
ST.
BROOME S
ELDR
IDG
E ST
.
LUDL
OW
ST.
ORC
HARD
ST.
ALLE
N ST
.
CANAL ST.
FORSYTH ST.
BOW
ERY
CHRY
STIE
ST.
ELIZ
ABET
H ST
.
MO
TT S
T.
DOYER ST
PELL ST.
MUL
BERR
Y ST
.
BAYARD ST.
CHAT
HAM
SQ
PARK R
OW
PEARL ST.
CATHERINE ST.
R F WAGNER PL
MOSCO ST
WORTH ST
JAMES ST
ST.J
AMES
PL.
RIVINGTON ST.
CHRY
STIE
ST.
BOW
ERY
ALLEN ST
DELANCEY ST
ALLE
N ST
TRYO
N ROW
ROSE
ST
CHUR
CH S
T
CLIFF
ST
FRANKFORT ST
GOLD
ST
SPRUCE ST
PARK R
OW
WIL
LIAM
ST
BEEKMAN ST
NASS
AU S
T
THEA
TRE
AL
ANN ST
FULTON ST
WAT
ER ST
PECK SLIPPECK SLIP
DOVER ST
DEY ST
FULTON ST
VESEY ST
BARCLAY ST
JOHN ST
FRON
T STW
ATER
ST
BEEKMAN ST
PEAR
L ST
PLATT ST
DUTC
H ST
FULTON ST
JOHN ST
LIBE
RTY
PL
LIBERTY ST
MAIDEN LACORTLANDT ST
SOUT
H ST
TRIM
BLE
PL
THOMAS ST
FOLE
Y SQ
BAXT
ER S
T
CENT
RE S
T
WORTH ST
LAFAYETTE ST
HOGAN PL
PEARL ST
AVE OF THE AMERICAS
CANAL ST
LISPENARD ST
WALKER ST
BRO
ADW
AY
WHITE ST
CHUR
CH S
T
FRAN
KLIN
PL
CORT
LAND
T AL
LEONARD ST
FRANKLIN ST
LAFA
YETT
E ST
CHAMBERS ST
READE ST
DUANE ST
AVENUE OF THE FINEST
PARK
ROW
MADISON ST
ELK
ST
REPUBLICAN AL
CHUR
CH S
T
BRO
ADW
AY
PARK PL
MURRAY ST
WARREN ST
PEDE
STRI
AN ST
ME ST
G ST LAFA
YETT
E ST
SPRING ST
CLEV
ELAN
D PL
BROOME ST
WO
OST
ER S
T
SPRING ST
GRE
ENE
ST
GRAND ST
CENT
RE M
ARKE
T PL
KENMARE ST
CRO
SBY
ST
MER
CER
ST
LAFA
YETT
E ST
BRO
ADW
AY
BROOME ST
HOWARD ST
GRAND STCE
NTRE
ST
CANAL ST
CANAL ST
HESTER ST
298
290
184
270
14014
9
125
292
163
218133
3194
534
197
212
166
45231
179
13244 701
108171
789
50
368
501
366
302691
107
BOW
ERY
630
369
26 284
223
568
429
119
74 825
6
964
138
48
134
915 40
99256 80
265
28
0
14961
79
61890
21572 675
785128
73754
411006
45 337477
162
77
508
142
216
22
268 141
43
139350
2
32
23
177233
0221
488
181
265
514
404
368
338
30
70
EAST
RIV
ER
BROOKLYN BRIDGE
BENS
ON
PL
CATHERINE LA
THEA
TRE
AL
29097
387
10
210
307
187
255
142
0 0
7
17
Figure 7-5b2006 No-Action Traffic Volumes - MD Peak Hour
Security Zone
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS
Analyzed Intersections (Signalized)Analyzed Intersections (Unsignalized)
Legend
174146
3
54
6
61
370
674182
67
6826515
180
137
846
62
28552 43
8676
122538
32639
991101
644
53
86
101463
74
65166
49
26
25
18
129
6135062
6810
32131
52
144
637 121
613
30
139
691
718
362
387
30
706
729
BOW
ERY
125
986167
596
522
532
46
50 703
34355
652
39 138
165
16063
101
343
197
631
11935
77272
287 337
154
139
116
236
141
336
251
HESTER ST
CANAL ST
CANAL ST
CENT
RE S
TGRAND ST
HOWARD ST
BROOME ST
BRO
ADW
AY
LAFA
YETT
E ST
MER
CER
ST
CRO
SBY
ST
KENMARE ST
CENT
RE M
ARKE
T PL
GRAND ST
GRE
ENE
ST
SPRING ST
WO
OST
ER S
T
BROOME ST CLEV
ELAN
D PL
SPRING ST
LAFA
YETT
E ST
G ST
ME ST
PEDE
STRI
AN ST
WARREN ST
MURRAY ST
PARK PL
BRO
ADW
AY
CHUR
CH S
T
REPUBLICAN AL
ELK
ST
MADISON ST
PARK
ROW
AVENUE OF THE FINEST
DUANE ST
READE ST
CHAMBERS ST
LAFA
YETT
E ST
FRANKLIN ST
LEONARD ST
CORT
LAND
T AL
FRAN
KLIN
PL
CHUR
CH S
T
WHITE ST
BRO
ADW
AY
WALKER ST
LISPENARD ST
CANAL ST
AVE OF THE AMERICAS
PEARL ST
HOGAN PL
LAFAYETTE ST
WORTH ST
CENT
RE S
T
BAXT
ER S
T
FOLE
Y SQ
THOMAS ST
TRIM
BLE
PL
SOUT
H ST
CORTLANDT ST MAIDEN LA
LIBERTY ST
LIBE
RTY
PL
JOHN ST
FULTON ST
DUTC
H ST
PLATT ST
PEAR
L ST
BEEKMAN ST
WAT
ER ST
FRON
T ST
JOHN ST
BARCLAY ST
VESEY ST
FULTON ST
DEY ST
DOVER ST
PECK SLIP
PECK SLIP
WAT
ER ST
FULTON ST
ANN ST THEA
TRE
AL
NASS
AU S
T
BEEKMAN ST
WIL
LIAM
STPA
RK ROW
SPRUCE ST
GOLD
ST
FRANKFORT ST
CLIFF
ST
CHUR
CH S
T
ROSE
ST
TRYO
N ROW
ALLE
N ST
DELANCEY STALLEN ST
BOW
ERY
CHRY
STIE
ST.
RIVINGTON ST.
ST.J
AMES
PL.
JAMES ST
WORTH ST
MOSCO ST
R F WAGNER PL
CATHERINE ST.
PEARL ST.
PARK R
OW
CHAT
HAM
SQ
BAYARD ST.
MUL
BERR
Y ST
.
PELL ST.
DOYER ST
MO
TT S
T.
ELIZ
ABET
H ST
.
CHRY
STIE
ST.
BOW
ERY
FORSYTH ST.
CANAL ST.
ALLE
N ST
.
ORC
HARD
ST.
LUDL
OW
ST.
ELDR
IDG
E ST
.
BROOME S
FORS
YTH
ST.
HESTER ST.
SOUTH ST.
CHERRY ST.
CATHERINE SLIP
WATER ST
.
MONROE ST.OLIVER ST.
HENRY ST.
PIKE ST.
MARKET ST.
E. BROADWAY
DIVISION ST.
44
50770
90269
57
113354 99
533958265
89 6510
49
130252
14130
703
86466
239
52 563
357
4710
89
273214
710
106
487
1448
92
702
56
6288
627154
104414
562
150
410
397
74
152
55
190
15
5024
144
39811
132
910
157
272
247
59
501
4154
347
76020
105
712
4868
46 496
6241
062
349
192
2613
4 0
104
20
48
9
27476
37701
768
151
580436
276
7610
7
180
589
66 640 279
432190
8
304
44 427
17
13893
14172
36
274124
27088
41 51
28 357
28036
190
25117609
735125
8316
522
15
5
70
242
242
110
24
227
30
38
215
6025
0
297
65
30
444
233
307
196
116
427
41112
1
50
59
64
37
53
53
605
4737
244 10413
361
315
NB FDR OFFRAMPDOVER ST
BROOKLYN BR ONRAMPFRANKFORT ST
FDR ONRAMP
6 201
79
140246
80
1028
1 24
31
FDR ONRAMP
BROOKLYN BR OFFRAMP
R F WAGNER PL
739
110
527
310
5156112
52198
476417
151
50
EAST
RIV
ER
BROOKLYN BRIDGE
BENS
ON
PL
CATHERINE LA
THEA
TRE
AL
28090
10
220
461
310
245
273
1749
20
Figure 7-5c2006 No-Action Traffic Volumes - PM Peak Hour
Security Zone
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS
Analyzed Intersections (Signalized)Analyzed Intersections (Unsignalized)
Legend
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS Chapter 7: Traffic and Parking
7-11
Along the Bowery corridor, the intersection at Kenmare Street has congested movements in eachpeak hour, while at Canal Street and Broome Street, congested movements are noted in the AMand PM peak hours. The Grand Street and Division Street intersections have congestion in theAM and PM peak hours, respectively, while at Chatham Square, selected movements arecongested in each peak hour analyzed.
Along the Broadway corridor, congestion is found at Canal during the AM peak hour, atChambers Street in the AM and PM peak hours, while at Barclay Street congested movementsare in AM and midday peak hours. In addition, congestion occurs at Vesey Street during the AM,midday, and PM peak hours
In addition to the above noted Canal Street intersection, the intersection of Canal Street withLafayette Street exhibits one congested movement in the AM peak hour, during the middayperiod at the intersection with Centre Street, and during the PM peak hour at Mulberry Street. Atthe intersection of Centre Street and Chambers Street, congestion occurs during the MD and PMpeak hours. Along Church Street, the intersections at Chambers Street and Worth Street havecongested movements in the AM peak hour.
In the eastern portion of the study area, the East Broadway/Market Street intersection has onecongested movement in the PM peak hour. Along Pearl Street, the intersection with FrankfortStreet exhibits at least one congested movement in each peak hour, while at Robert F. WagnerSr. Place, eastbound congestion is found in the AM and PM peak hours as noted in Table 7-4. Table 7-4 also shows that under No-Action conditions, the Worth Street/Centre Streetintersection has northbound congestion in all peak hours, while one unsignalized intersection atBaxter Street/Walker Street exhibits PM congestion in the eastbound movement.
Parking
Off-Street Parking
The 400-space municipal parking lot that was located adjacent to Police Plaza was closed to thepublic in June 2001 and would continue to be closed to the public in the 2006 No-Actioncondition. As discussed in Chapter 1, “Project Description,” in early 2001, an EAS was preparedfor the Public Safety Answering Center II that was to be located in an existing building at 109-113 Park Row. This EAS analyzed the closure of the 400-space municipal garage to the public,and a negative declaration was issued June 12, 2001. The garage was then officially closed tothe public on June 30, 2001. However, following the events of September 11, 2001, the above-mentioned project was cancelled and the building remains vacant. The municipal garage wasreconstructed and re-opened to NYPD authorized vehicles in April of 2004. Table 7-5 shows the
Table 7-4: 2006 No-Action Traffic Conditions at Signalized Intersections
SIGNALIZED Lane V/C Delay LOS Lane V/C Delay LOS Lane V/C Delay LOSINTERSECTION Group Ratio (sec/veh) Group Ratio (sec/veh) Group Ratio (sec/veh)Bowery Corridor1) Bowery (N-S) @ NB-DefL NB-DefL 0.91 72.3 E * NB-DefL 1.03 102.4 F *Kenmare Street (E-W) NB-TR NB-TR 0.58 26.7 C NB-TR 0.64 27.8 C
NB-LTR 0.94 42.9 D * NB-LTR NB-LTR SB-Def L 0.72 47.6 D SB-Def L 0.86 48.7 D SB-Def L 0.99 73.4 E *SB-TR 0.89 38.4 D SB-TR 0.95 47.5 D * SB-TR 0.55 17.6 B EB-LTR 0.33 19.6 B EB-LTR 0.49 22.0 C EB-LTR 0.52 22.2 C WB-L 1.03 91.5 F * WB-L 0.78 47.5 D WB-L 0.89 60.9 E *WB-TR 0.66 25.0 C WB-TR 0.43 20.8 C WB-TR 0.39 20.2 C WB-R 1.00 81.1 F * WB-R 0.64 30.6 C WB-R 0.84 45.1 D
2) Bowery (N-S) @ NB-LT 0.97 38.6 D * NB-LT 0.74 20.6 C NB-LT 0.90 31.5 C *Broome Street (E-W) SB-TR 0.60 16.0 B SB-TR 0.61 16.4 B SB-TR 0.68 17.7 B
WB-LTR 0.61 31.4 C WB-LTR 0.51 29.0 C WB-LTR 0.60 31.9 C
3) Bowery (N-S) @ NB-T 0.95 33.9 C * NB-T 0.51 14.3 B NB-T 0.55 14.8 B Grand Street (E-W) NB-R 0.99 72.4 E * NB-R 0.77 38.2 D NB-R 0.62 24.6 C
SB-TL 0.51 14.4 B SB-TL 0.50 14.2 B SB-TL 0.58 15.5 B EB-LTR 0.58 30.0 C EB-LTR 0.79 41.9 D EB-LTR 0.79 41.3 D
4) Bowery (N-S) @ NB-T 0.62 33.9 C NB-T 0.54 32.0 C NB-T 0.39 29.3 C Canal Street (E-W) + SB-DefL 0.96 67.3 E * SB-DefL 0.73 35.7 D SB-DefL 1.00 64.3 E *
SB-TR 0.71 29.5 C SB-TR 0.70 30.0 C SB-TR 0.40 20.7 C EB-T 1.02 60.8 E * EB-T 0.70 26.2 C EB-T 0.91 38.1 D *EB-R 0.47 25.3 C EB-R 0.67 29.3 C EB-R 0.20 18.1 B WB-T 0.94 41.2 D * WB-T 0.60 24.0 C WB-T 0.44 20.7 C
5) Bowery (N-S) @ NB-T 0.30 16.7 B NB-T 0.34 17.1 B NB-T 0.44 18.3 B Division Street (E-W) NB-R 0.02 14.2 B NB-R 0.19 17.2 B NB-R 0.07 15.0 B
SB-LT 0.32 17.0 B SB-LT 0.38 17.6 B SB-LT 0.31 16.8 B EB-LTR 0.00 32.9 C EB-LTR 0.06 33.8 C EB-LTR 0.07 34.0 C WB-T 0.53 36.1 D WB-T 0.46 33.6 C WB-T 0.57 36.6 D WB-R 0.70 26.6 C WB-R 0.57 22.4 C WB-R 1.02 63.5 E *
6) Chatham Square (N-S) @ NB-T 0.20 8.1 A NB-T 0.22 8.2 A NB-T 0.23 8.2 A East Broadway (E-W) NB-R 0.73 26.4 C NB-R 0.69 22.9 C NB-R 0.65 19.7 B
SB-L 0.69 24.6 C SB-L 0.88 45.3 D SB-L 0.66 21.7 C SB-T 0.19 7.9 A SB-T 0.18 7.9 A SB-T 0.17 7.8 A WB-L 0.58 35.1 D WB-L 0.34 28.2 C WB-L 0.32 27.6 C WB-R 0.18 26.8 C WB-R 0.35 30.8 C WB-R 0.44 33.0 C
7) Chatham Square (N-S) @ NB-TR 0.28 21.9 C NB-TR 0.37 24.4 C NB-TR 0.41 24.9 C Worth Street (E-W) SB-L 1.00 95.1 F * SB-L 0.83 62.9 E * SB-L 0.75 53.9 D
SB-TR 0.93 63.8 E * SB-TR 0.98 77.1 E * SB-TR 0.96 68.8 E *EB-DefL EB-DefL 0.46 27.4 C EB-DefL 0.55 31.1 C EB-LTR 0.29 25.1 C EB-LTR EB-LTR EB-TR EB-TR 0.23 22.1 C EB-TR 0.26 22.6 C WB-LT 0.10 22.7 C WB-LT 0.11 20.5 C WB-LT 0.10 20.5 C WB-R 0.60 35.8 D WB-R 0.76 45.9 D WB-R 0.66 35.7 D
Mott Street (E-W) EB-LTR 0.71 58.3 E * EB-LTR 0.87 78.6 E * EB-LTR 0.65 51.8 D
NOTES:EB-Eastbound, WB-Westbound, NB-Northbound, SB-SouthboundL-Left, T-Through, R-Right, DfL-Analysis considers a Defacto Left Lane on this approach .V/C Ratio - Volume to Capacity Ratio, SEC/VEH - Seconds per vehicleLOS - Level of service
* -Denotes Congested Location in the 2006 No-Action ConditionAnalysis is based on the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual Methodology (HCS 2000 4.1f).
+ -Westbound right movement at Canal Street and Bowery is controlled by a separate signal as it is a channelized right turn
2006 No-Action AM Peak Hour 2006 No-Action Midday Peak Hour 2006 No-Action PM Peak Hour
Table 7-4: 2006 No-Action Traffic Conditions at Signalized Intersections
SIGNALIZED Lane V/C Delay LOS Lane V/C Delay LOS Lane V/C Delay LOSINTERSECTION Group Ratio (sec/veh) Group Ratio (sec/veh) Group Ratio (sec/veh)
2006 No-Action AM Peak Hour 2006 No-Action Midday Peak Hour 2006 No-Action PM Peak Hour
Broadway Corridor8) Broadway (N-S) @ SB-LTR 0.94 41.8 D * SB-LTR 0.81 30.4 C SB-LTR 0.63 26.3 C Canal Street (E-W) EB-TR 0.88 34.4 C EB-TR 0.72 27.4 C EB-TR 0.88 33.9 C
WB-DefL WB-DefL WB-DefL 0.35 29.2 C WB-LT 0.71 18.5 B WB-LT 0.71 20.1 C WB-LT WB-T WB-T WB-T 0.32 12.4 B
9) Broadway (N-S) @ SB-LTR 0.46 15.4 B SB-LTR 0.53 12.8 B SB-LTR 0.50 16.0 B Worth Street (E-W) EB-TR 0.52 25.2 C EB-TR 0.49 23.5 C EB-TR 0.35 21.0 C
WB-L 0.40 25.3 C WB-L 0.58 33.7 C WB-L 0.25 21.1 C WB-T 0.65 27.9 C WB-T 0.30 20.3 C WB-T 0.57 25.3 C
10) Broadway (N-S) @ SB-T 0.66 17.6 B SB-T 0.59 11.9 B SB-T 0.49 14.4 B Thomas Street (E-W) SB-R 0.34 15.7 B SB-R 0.12 7.9 A SB-R 0.26 14.3 B
11) Broadway (N-S) @ SB-T 0.66 19.4 B SB-T 0.59 14.1 B SB-T 0.55 17.2 B Duane Street (E-W) EB-R 0.45 24.5 C EB-R 0.51 26.0 C EB-R 0.36 21.7 C
12) Broadway (N-S) @ SB-LT 1.01 59.0 E * SB-LT 0.81 21.0 C SB-LT 0.80 26.0 C Chambers Street (E-W) SB-R 0.32 25.2 C SB-R 0.17 14.3 B SB-R 0.24 15.7 B
EB-TR 0.69 29.7 C EB-TR 0.68 30.1 C EB-TR 0.63 25.8 C WB-LT 1.04 74.0 E * WB-LT 0.80 33.3 C WB-LT 0.98 58.9 E *
13) Broadway (N-S) @ SB-T 0.82 29.1 C SB-T 0.56 22.2 C SB-T 0.71 25.4 C Barclay Street (E-W) SB-R 0.37 22.6 C SB-R 0.18 18.8 B SB-R 0.18 18.9 B
WB-L 0.99 99.9 F * WB-L 1.00 97.2 F * WB-L 0.72 53.2 D WB-LT 0.86 48.3 D WB-LT 0.81 43.1 D WB-LT 0.58 34.4 C
14) Broadway (N-S) @ SB-L 0.82 33.3 C SB-L 0.72 23.8 C SB-L 0.94 46.5 D *Vesey Street (E-W) SB-T 0.61 20.7 C SB-T 0.45 15.5 B SB-T 0.42 17.7 B
EB-TR 1.00 93.6 F * EB-TR 1.02 102.8 F * EB-TR 0.65 50.5 D
15) Broadway (N-S) @ SB-TR 0.50 10.6 B SB-TR 0.41 5.6 A SB-TR 0.33 8.9 A Fulton Street (E-W) WB-LT 0.22 25.9 C WB-LT 0.33 27.5 C WB-LT 0.20 25.5 C
Canal Corridor 16) Lafayette Street (N-S) @ SB-L 0.25 28.6 C SB-L 0.35 31.3 C SB-L 0.54 39.0 D Canal Street (E-W) SB-T 0.73 40.4 D SB-T 0.46 30.5 C SB-T 0.70 39.0 D
SB-R 1.04 114.2 F * SB-R 0.48 36.8 D SB-R 0.38 33.2 C EB-TR 0.77 23.6 C EB-TR 0.62 19.7 B EB-TR 0.70 21.2 C WB-LT 0.54 11.3 B WB-LT 0.38 9.4 A WB-LT 0.32 8.9 A
17) Centre Street (N-S) @ NB-LT 0.75 37.5 D NB-LT 0.52 30.3 C NB-LT 0.68 34.1 C Canal Street (E-W) NB-R 0.21 27.7 C NB-R 0.12 25.5 C NB-R 0.09 25.0 C
EB-DefL 0.78 42.8 D EB-DL EB-DL 0.68 26.8 C EB-T 0.61 12.5 B EB-T 0.99 43.5 D * EB-T 0.59 12.1 B WB-TR 0.70 23.4 C WB-TR 0.74 26.0 C WB-TR 0.42 18.5 B
18) Mulberry Street (N-S) @ NB-LTR 0.44 27.3 C NB-LTR 0.49 28.5 C NB-LTR 0.64 34.1 C Canal Street (E-W) EB-LT 0.79 21.2 C EB-LT 0.77 20.1 C EB-LT 0.96 36.1 D *
WB-TR 0.79 20.9 C WB-TR 0.64 16.7 B WB-TR 0.45 13.3 B
NOTES:EB-Eastbound, WB-Westbound, NB-Northbound, SB-SouthboundL-Left, T-Through, R-Right, DfL-Analysis considers a Defacto Left Lane on this approach .V/C Ratio - Volume to Capacity Ratio, SEC/VEH - Seconds per vehicleLOS - Level of service
* -Denotes Congested Location in the 2006 No-Action ConditionAnalysis is based on the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual Methodology (HCS 2000 4.1f).
Table 7-4: 2006 No-Action Traffic Conditions at Signalized Intersections
SIGNALIZED Lane V/C Delay LOS Lane V/C Delay LOS Lane V/C Delay LOSINTERSECTION Group Ratio (sec/veh) Group Ratio (sec/veh) Group Ratio (sec/veh)
2006 No-Action AM Peak Hour 2006 No-Action Midday Peak Hour 2006 No-Action PM Peak Hour
Centre Corridor19) Centre Street (N-S) @ NB-L 0.88 33.7 C NB-L 0.91 46.9 D * NB-L 0.93 50.2 D *Chambers Street (E-W) NB-LT 0.29 10.1 B NB-LT 0.38 8.8 A NB-LT 0.49 10.0 A
SB-TR 0.28 25.5 C SB-TR 0.40 27.2 C SB-TR 0.54 29.6 C EB-RT 0.75 36.1 D EB-RT 0.51 29.1 C EB-RT 0.83 40.4 D
20) Centre Street (N-S) @ SB-L 0.62 12.0 B SB-L 0.53 10.6 B SB-L 0.87 22.8 C Tryon Row - Brooklyn Bridge (E-W)SB-LT 0.08 6.1 A SB-LT 0.16 6.7 A SB-LT 0.15 6.6 A
Church Corridor 21) Church Street (N-S) @ NB-T 0.59 17.3 B NB-T 0.52 12.7 B NB-T 0.33 13.9 B Fulton Street (E-W) WB-R 0.46 28.4 C WB-R 0.32 25.0 C WB-R 0.34 25.2 C
22) Church Street (N-S) @ NB-T 0.46 13.1 B NB-T 0.39 8.7 A NB-T 0.28 11.3 B Vesey Street (E-W) NB-R 0.87 43.6 D NB-R 0.77 26.5 C NB-R 0.36 13.9 B
23) Church Street (N-S) @ NB-LT 0.54 9.9 A NB-LT 0.42 12.8 B NB-LT 0.29 11.5 B Barclay Street (E-W) WB-TR 0.34 24.5 C WB-TR 0.36 23.0 C WB-TR 0.28 22.0 C
24) Church Street (N-S) @ NB-LTR 0.77 24.8 C NB-LTR 0.67 18.9 B NB-LTR 0.76 24.3 C Chambers Street (E-W) EB-LT 0.99 63.1 E * EB-LT 0.76 31.5 C EB-LT 0.73 28.4 C
WB-TR 0.99 58.5 E * WB-TR 0.68 25.1 C WB-TR 0.73 27.0 C
25) Church Street (N-S) @ NB-LTR 0.62 15.5 B NB-LTR 0.63 11.3 B NB-LTR 0.56 14.5 B Worth Street (E-W) EB-LT 0.29 22.5 C EB-LT 0.28 22.3 C EB-LT 0.19 21.1 C
WB-TR 0.94 57.9 E * WB-TR 0.51 27.7 C WB-TR 0.79 38.1 D
Division Corridor 26) Pike Street (N-S) @ NB-LT 0.48 12.7 B NB-LT 0.34 11.0 B NB-LT 0.55 13.7 B Division Street (E-W) SB-T 0.29 10.5 B SB-T 0.26 10.2 B SB-T 0.28 10.4 B
SB-R 0.53 17.2 B SB-R 0.44 14.7 B SB-R 0.48 15.4 B WB-LTR 0.23 23.9 C WB-LTR 0.36 26.5 C WB-LTR 0.46 28.5 C
East Broadway Corridor 27) Forsyth Street (N-S) @ SB-LR 0.53 33.5 C SB-LR 0.44 30.0 C SB-LR 0.41 29.2 C East Broadway (E-W) EB-LT 0.44 11.6 B EB-LT 0.47 11.9 B EB-LT 0.24 8.8 A
WB-TR 0.28 9.2 A WB-TR 0.23 8.7 A WB-TR 0.32 9.5 A
28) Market Street (N-S) @ NB-LTR 0.61 31.8 C NB-LTR 0.68 35.8 D NB-LTR 0.39 13.5 B East Broadway (E-W) EB-LT 0.53 16.2 B EB-LT 0.28 11.6 B EB-LT 0.65 30.6 C
WB-TR 0.55 16.7 B WB-TR 0.48 14.9 B WB-TR 1.02 79.6 E *
Frankfort Corridor 29) Gold Street (N-S) @ NB-T 0.00 25.7 C NB-T 0.00 25.7 C NB-T 0.00 25.7 C Frankfort Street (E-W) NB-R 0.00 25.7 C NB-R NB-R
EB-TR 0.58 30.0 C EB-TR 0.65 31.6 C EB-TR 0.71 35.5 D WB-L 0.17 27.3 C WB-L 0.30 29.3 C WB-L 0.18 27.8 C
30) Park Row (N-S) @ NB-T 0.27 12.8 B NB-T 0.26 12.7 B NB-T 0.30 13.0 B Beekman Street (E-W) SB-T 0.26 12.7 B SB-T 0.21 12.2 B SB-T 0.18 12.0 B
WB-LR 0.57 26.8 C WB-LR 0.61 27.5 C WB-LR 0.55 25.9 C
31) Park Row (N-S) @ NB-TR 0.40 22.3 C NB-TR 0.28 8.5 A NB-TR 0.47 10.4 B Spruce Street (E-W) SB-L 0.55 20.4 C SB-L 0.18 0.8 A SB-L 0.20 1.6 A
SB-T 0.45 23.3 C SB-T 0.28 8.6 A SB-T 0.24 8.3 A
NOTES:EB-Eastbound, WB-Westbound, NB-Northbound, SB-SouthboundL-Left, T-Through, R-Right, DfL-Analysis considers a Defacto Left Lane on this approach .V/C Ratio - Volume to Capacity Ratio, SEC/VEH - Seconds per vehicleLOS - Level of service
* -Denotes Congested Location in the 2006 No-Action ConditionAnalysis is based on the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual Methodology (HCS 2000 4.1f).
Table 7-4: 2006 No-Action Traffic Conditions at Signalized Intersections
SIGNALIZED Lane V/C Delay LOS Lane V/C Delay LOS Lane V/C Delay LOSINTERSECTION Group Ratio (sec/veh) Group Ratio (sec/veh) Group Ratio (sec/veh)
2006 No-Action AM Peak Hour 2006 No-Action Midday Peak Hour 2006 No-Action PM Peak Hour
Pearl Corridor32) Pearl Street (N-S) @ NB-LT 0.72 22.5 C NB-LT 0.77 24.2 C NB-LT 0.89 32.0 C Fulton Street (E-W) SB-T 0.43 16.1 B SB-T 0.46 16.5 B SB-T 0.67 21.4 C
SB-R 0.13 12.8 B SB-R 0.11 12.5 B SB-R 0.07 11.8 B EB-LR 0.66 43.4 D EB-LR 0.72 48.4 D EB-LR 0.49 34.4 C
33) Pearl Street (N-S) @ NB-DefL NB-DefL NB-DefL 0.97 62.4 E *Frankfort Street (E-W) NB-TR 0.62 14.2 B NB-TR 0.44 11.0 B NB-TR 0.52 12.3 B
SB-LTR 0.46 11.0 B SB-LTR 0.35 9.8 A SB-LTR 0.55 12.3 B EB-L 0.92 69.7 E * EB-L 0.89 59.1 E * EB-L 0.92 67.3 E *EB-TR 0.80 54.1 D EB-TR 0.71 41.1 D EB-TR 0.79 50.7 D WB-LTR 0.85 52.3 D WB-LTR 0.11 24.0 C WB-LTR 0.16 24.6 C
34) Pearl Street (N-S) @ NB-LTR 0.63 24.0 C NB-LTR 0.30 18.0 B NB-LTR 0.30 17.9 B Robert F Wagner Sr. Place (E-W)SB-TR 0.53 22.1 C SB-TR 0.33 18.5 B SB-TR 0.37 18.8 B
EB-LTR 0.88 55.9 E * EB-LTR 0.71 43.6 D EB-LTR 1.04 88.7 F *WB-L 0.79 44.3 D WB-L 0.74 43.1 D WB-L 0.72 41.5 D WB-RT 0.12 31.1 C WB-RT 0.05 30.2 C WB-RT 0.04 30.0 C WB-R 0.31 16.2 B WB-R 0.29 15.9 B WB-R 0.48 38.2 D
35) Pearl Street (N-S) @ NB-DefL 0.67 18.7 B NB-DefL NB-DefL 0.62 18.2 B St. James Place (E-W) NB-T 0.48 12.5 B NB-T NB-T 0.30 9.7 A
NB-LT NB-LT 0.37 10.1 B NB-LT SB-T 0.24 8.8 A SB-T 0.19 8.4 A SB-T 0.20 8.4 A
St. James Corridor 36) St. James Place (N-S) @ NB-TR 0.52 21.2 C NB-TR 0.42 18.9 B NB-TR 0.33 17.4 B Madison Street (E-W) SB-LT 0.55 22.2 C SB-LT 0.50 21.0 C SB-LT 0.43 19.5 B
WB-L WB-L WB-L WB-LTR 0.13 15.0 B WB-LTR 0.09 14.6 B WB-LTR 0.17 15.3 B WB-R WB-R WB-R
Worth Street Corridor 37) Centre Street (N-S) @ NB-L 1.05 92.4 F * NB-L 1.04 110.3 F * NB-L 1.05 96.3 F *Worth Street (E-W) NB-TR 0.73 32.3 C NB-TR 0.58 28.0 C NB-TR 0.64 29.4 C
EB-DefL EB-DefL EB-DefL EB-T 0.23 10.7 B EB-T 0.32 11.6 B EB-T 0.28 11.1 B WB-TR 0.18 16.2 B WB-TR 0.20 16.5 B WB-TR 0.23 16.9 B
38) Lafayette Street (N-S) SB-LTR 0.44 20.8 C SB-LTR 0.40 20.4 C SB-LTR 0.48 21.4 C Worth Street (E-W) EB-TR 0.23 20.5 C EB-TR 0.47 23.7 C EB-TR 0.35 21.7 C
WB-L 0.16 14.0 B WB-L 0.15 15.1 B WB-L 0.19 14.9 B WB-T 0.65 22.1 C WB-T 0.33 15.4 B WB-T 0.51 18.4 B
Table 7-4: 2006 No-Action Traffic Conditions at Unsignalized Intersections
UNSIGNALIZED Lane V/C Delay LOS Lane V/C Delay LOS Lane V/C Delay LOSINTERSECTION Group Ratio (sec/veh) Group Ratio (sec/veh) Group Ratio (sec/veh)Baxter Corridor1) Baxter Street (N-S) @ EB-TR 0.46 22.9 C EB-TR 0.62 27.2 D EB-TR 0.95 67.7 F *Walker Street (E-W)
2) Baxter Street (N-S) @ EB-LT 0.01 7.6 A EB-LT 0.00 7.5 A EB-LT 0.01 7.6 AWorth Street (E-W)
NOTES:EB-Eastbound, WB-Westbound, NB-Northbound, SB-SouthboundL-Left, T-Through, R-Right, DfL-Analysis considers a Defacto Left Lane on this approach .V/C Ratio - Volume to Capacity Ratio, SEC/VEH - Seconds per vehicleLOS - Level of service
* -Denotes Congested Location in the 2006 No-Action ConditionAnalysis is based on the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual Methodology (HCS 2000 4.1e).
2006 No-Action AM Peak Hour 2006 No-Action Midday Peak Hour 2006 No-Action PM Peak Hour
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS Chapter 7: Traffic and Parking
7-12
2006 No-Action off-street parking facilities in the study area and their estimated weekday middayutilizations. It is assumed that the off-street parking facilities in the study area in the 2006 No-Action condition would be the same in the 2006 With-Action condition. Therefore, the parkingsurvey of capacity and utilization conducted in 2006 with the street closures in place would bethe same if the street closures were not in place. In 2006, as shown in the table, there are 37facilities with an overall capacity of 4,409 spaces (see Figure 7-6 for off-street parking facilities).The overall midday utilization rate was observed at about 86% with about 596 spaces available.
All other off-street parking facilities within the study area would most likely not be affected in2006 if the action was not in place.
On-Street Parking
As discussed above, in the 2006 No-Action condition streets that were closed as part of the 2001security plan would be open to all vehicles. Based on available information, it is estimated thatparking for approximately 70 vehicles existed along Park Row, Madison Street, Pearl Street, andother roadways now closed due to the security plan. Outside of the security zone, it is notexpected that regulations or supply would be different in the 2006 No-Action or under With-Action conditions. Legal on-street parking spaces within the security zone would be availableto all public vehicles in the 2006 No-Action condition. On-street parking conditions within thestudy area would most likely not be different in the 2006 No-Action condition from the 2006With-Action condition. Legal on-street parking would continue to be very limited and illegalcurbside parking and standing would continue to be prevalent throughout the study area.
D. 2006 WITH-ACTION CONDITION
Vehicular Traffic
In conjunction with the May 2005 data collection effort, traffic volumes and other characteristicsof the study area were documented. While action conditions are rarely measured in the field, forthis action, the transportation effects of the security plan have been documented and are presentedin this section. It should be noted that With-Action condition does not include any NYC Transitbuses on Park Row. The return of permanent bus services to Park Row is addressed in Chapter11, “Mitigation”.
Figure 7-7 provides the 2006 With-Action condition traffic volumes in the study area for the AM,midday and PM peak hours. The resulting traffic capacity analysis of the 2006 With-Actionconditions is presented in Table 7-6 along with a comparison with 2006 No-Action conditions.
No. Operator Address CapacityMD (12-1)
Util.Spaces Avail.
1 Edison NY Parking LLC 174 Centre Street 93 100% 02 Kennee Parking Corp 114-116 Mulberry Street 42 93% 33 Chung Pak Parking Corp 95-97 1/2 Baxter Street 28 89% 34 Chinatown Parking Corp 88 Walker Street 40 100% 05 Champion Tribeca LLC 411-413 Broadway 60 70% 186 Margaret E Pescatore 98-100 Bayard Street 12 100% 07 Champion Mulberry LLC 62-64 Mulberry Street 191 90% 198 SSL Franklin St Parking Lot Inc 48-52 Franklin Street 40 100% 09 95 Worth LLC 336 Broadway/95 Worth St 114 95% 610 Central Parking System of NY 101 Worth Street 226 90% 2311 Cobalt Car Park LLC 108 Leonard Street 143 95% 712 RAEM 93 Chambers Street 48 79% 1013 Washington Street Corp 89-91 Murray Street 149 100% 014 BGB Parking System 6 Barclay Street 86 40% 5215 25-27 Beekman Street Associates 25-27 Beekman Street 149 80% 3016 John Street Parking 57-61 Ann Street 276 64% 10017 Central Parking Systems Inc 169 William Street 52 100% 018 NYU Downtown Hospital 170 William Street 110 100% 019 Ropetmar Garage Inc 80 Gold Street 351 100% 020 Ropetmar Garage Inc 299 Pearl Street 310 92% 2521 Allright Parking Management Corp 10-12 Peck Slip 105 77% 2422 Edison Lafayette Corp 300-302 Pearl Street 25 76% 623 Edison Lafayette Corp 288-294 Pearl Street 36 78% 824 Downtown Parking Corp 56 Fulton Street 280 50% 14025 Edison Lafayette Corp 228-232 Water Street 120 88% 1426 (name unknown) 88 Madison Street 50 100% 027 (name unknown) 38 Henry Street 150 100% 028 (name unknown) 2 Division Street 300 90% 3029 (name unknown) 79 Division Street 9 100% 030 (name unknown) 38 Bowery 140 90% 1431 (name unknown) 44 Elizabeth Street 150 80% 3032 Chatham Parking Systems Inc 180 Park Row 130 90% 1333 (name unknown) 26 Forsyth Street 60 95% 334 (name unknown) 58 Walker Street 40 90% 435 (name unknown) 49-59 Henry Street 114 100% 036 Municipal Lot Leonard St & Lafayette St 40 100% 037 Quick Park 2 Elizabeth Street 140 90% 14
4,409 86% 596Source: PHA Field Survey 2006 & 2007
Table 7-5: 2006 No-Action Off-Street Parking Facilities within 1/4-mile of the Siteand Weekday Utilization
Total
BROOKLYN BRIDGE
DIVISION ST.
E. BROADWAY
MARKET ST.
PIKE ST. HENRY ST.CATHERINE ST
OLIVER ST.
MONROE ST.
WATER ST.
MARKET SLIP
CATHERINE SLIP
CHERRY ST.
SOUTH ST.
HESTER ST.
FORS
YTH
ST.
ELDR
IDGE
ST.
LUDL
OW
ST.
ORC
HARD
ST.
ALLE
N ST
.
CANAL ST.
FORSYTH ST.
BOW
ERY
HESTER ST.
CHRY
STIE
ST.
GRAND ST.
ELIZ
ABET
H ST
.
MO
TT S
T.
DOYER STPELL ST.
MUL
BERR
Y ST
.
BAYARD ST.
CHAT
HAM
SQ
PARK R
OW
PEARL ST.
PEAR
L ST
.
CATHERINE ST.
R F WAGNER PL
MOSCO ST
THOMAS PAINE ST.BA
XTER
ST
JAMES ST
ST.JA
MES
PL.
ALLEN ST
ALLE
N ST
TRYON ROW
ROSE
ST
EAST
RIV
ER
BROOKLYN BRIDGE
CHUR
CH S
T CLIFF
ST
FRANKFORT ST
FRANKFORT ST
PACE
PZ
GO
LD S
T
SPRUCE ST
PARK R
OW
WIL
LIAM
ST
BEEKMAN ST
NASS
AU S
T
THEA
TRE
AL
ANN ST
FULTON ST
WAT
ER S
T
ROBERT F WAGNER SR PL
PECK SLIPPECK SLIP
DOVER ST
DEY ST
FULTON ST
VESEY ST
BARCLAY ST
FRON
T STWAT
ER S
T
BEEKMAN ST
PEAR
L ST
RYDE
RS A
L
PLATT ST
DUTC
H ST
FULTON ST
JOHN ST
LIBE
RTY
PL
MAIDEN LACORTLANDT ST
SOUT
H ST
TRIM
BLE
PL
THOMAS ST
FOLE
Y SQ
BAXT
ER S
T
CENT
RE S
T
WORTH ST
LAFA
YETT
E ST
POLI
CE P
Z
BAXTER ST
HOGAN PL
PEARL ST
W B
ROAD
WAY
AVE OF THE AMERICAS
CANAL ST
LISPENARD ST
WALKER ST
BRO
ADW
AY
WHITE ST
CHUR
CH S
T
FRAN
KLIN
PL
CORT
LAND
T AL
LEONARD ST
FRANKLIN ST
BENS
ON
PL
CATHERINE LA
LAFA
YETT
E ST
CHAMBERS ST
READE ST
DUANE ST
AVENUE OF THE FINEST
PARK R
OW
CARD
INAL H
AYES P
L
MADISON ST
CENT
RE S
T
ELK
ST
REPUBLICAN AL
MAN
HATT
AN A
L
CHUR
CH S
T
BRO
ADW
AY
PARK PL
MURRAY ST
WARREN ST
PEDE
STRI
AN S
T
W B
ROAD
WAY
WO
OST
ER S
T
GRE
ENE
ST
GRAND ST CEN
TRE
CRO
SBY
ST
MER
CER
ST
LAFA
YETT
E ST
BRO
ADW
AY
HOWARD ST
GRAND ST
CENT
RE S
T
BAXT
ER S
T
CANAL ST
MUL
BERR
Y ST
MO
TT S
T
ELIZ
ABET
H ST
HESTER ST
BOW
ERY
1
2
3
45
6
7
8
9 10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1718
19
20
2122
2324
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
TRIBECA
SOUTHSTREETSEAPORT
CIVICCENTER
CHINATOWN
1 2005 Off-Street Public Parking Facility1 / 4 Mile Boundary
Legend
Security Zone
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS Figure 7-62006 Off-Street Parking Facilities
502
266
256211
25
169
14
63
215
407150
27
187268
10
166
166
637
106
12140 29
4352
100123
261078
481108
1020
55
98
661020
20
47163
13
262
6535683
5711
4699
43
235
1052 108
917
39
135
360
556
312
291
31
493
1122
BOW
ERY
180
1017130
512
586
650
118
80 830
36180
712
36 50
151
168148
91
403
127
400
371119
101192
180 296
490
284
180
274
223
343
667
HESTER ST
CANAL ST
CANAL ST
CENT
RE S
T
GRAND ST
HOWARD ST
BROOME ST
BRO
ADW
AY
LAFA
YETT
E ST
MER
CER
ST
CRO
SBY
ST
KENMARE ST
CENT
RE M
ARKE
T PL
GRAND ST
GRE
ENE
ST
SPRING ST
WO
OST
ER S
T
BROOME ST CLEV
ELAN
D PL
SPRING ST
LAFA
YETT
E ST
ST
ME ST
PEDE
STRI
AN ST
WARREN ST
MURRAY ST
PARK PL
BRO
ADW
AY
CHUR
CH S
T
REPUBLICAN AL
ELK
ST
MADISON ST
PARK
ROW
AVENUE OF THE FINEST
DUANE ST
READE ST
CHAMBERS ST
LAFA
YETT
E ST
FRANKLIN ST
LEONARD ST
CORT
LAND
T AL
FRAN
KLIN
PL
CHUR
CH S
T
WHITE ST
BRO
ADW
AY
WALKER ST
LISPENARD ST
CANAL ST
AVE OF THE AMERICAS
PEARL ST
HOGAN PL
LAFAYETTE ST
WORTH ST
CENT
RE S
T
BAXT
ER S
T
FOLE
Y SQ
THOMAS ST
TRIM
BLE
PL
SOUT
H ST
CORTLANDT ST MAIDEN LA
LIBERTY ST
LIBE
RTY
PL
JOHN ST
FULTON ST
DUTC
H ST
PLATT ST
PEAR
L ST
BEEKMAN ST
WAT
ER ST
FRON
T ST
BARCLAY ST
VESEY ST
FULTON ST
DEY ST
DOVER ST
PECK SLIP
PECK SLIP
WAT
ER ST
FULTON ST
ANN ST THEA
TRE
AL
NASS
AU S
T
BEEKMAN ST
WIL
LIAM
STPA
RK ROW
SPRUCE ST
GOLD
ST
FRANKFORT ST
CLIFF
ST
CHUR
CH S
T
BROOKLYN BRIDGE
EAST
RIV
ER
ROSE
ST
TRYO
N ROW
ALLE
N ST
DELANCEY ST
ALLE
N ST
ALLEN ST
FORS
YTH
ST
BOW
ERY
CHRY
STIE
ST.
RIVINGTON ST.
ST.J
AMES
PL.
JAMES ST
WORTH ST
MOSCO ST
R F WAGNER PL
CATHERINE ST.
PEARL ST.
PARK R
OW
CHAT
HAM
SQ
BAYARD ST.
MUL
BERR
Y ST
.
PELL ST.
DOYER ST
MO
TT S
T.
ELIZ
ABET
H ST
.
CHRY
STIE
ST.
BOW
ERY
FORSYTH ST.
CANAL ST.
ALLE
N ST
.
ORC
HARD
ST.
ELDR
IDG
E ST
.
BROOME S
FORS
YTH
ST.
HESTER ST.
SOUTH ST.
CHERRY ST.
CATHERINE SLIP
WATER ST
.
MONROE ST.OLIVER ST.
HENRY ST.
PIKE ST.
MARKET ST.
E. BROADWAY
DIVISION ST.
46
93153
42278
155
111294 106921920
234
58 120
1136
177220
16630
830
114503
164
47 770
348
9912
07
368254
998
171
292
2877
65
995
80
69155
1117170
158392
994
100
403
426
109
166
38
12227036
115
62233
170
4760
249
165
713
140
111
514
7075
41 363
16740
340
245
228
3646
10
154
16
24
2
27251
14558
1229
260
10851047
402
8824
4
184
945
70 423 260
693241
17
184
63 380
36
18730
11771
29
28660
25660
51 9638 295
28443
193
950573
59885
9320
322 4
0
00
444
17
40
123
296
209
289
181
101
78
278
60050
75
154
30
100
359
6335
180 1533
179
571
NB FDR OFFRAMPDOVER ST
BROOKLYN BR ONRAMPFRANKFORT ST
FDR ONRAMP
23 246
4430
77201
63
3343
410
4
16
FDR ONRAMP
BROOKLYN BR OFFRAMP
R F WAGNER PL
945
60
18 2
2315192 296
266
476322
467
BENS
ON
PL
CATHERINE LA
5
12
LegendAnalyzed Intersections (Unsignalized)Analyzed Intersections (Signalized)
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS
Security Zone
Figure 7-7a2006 With-Action Traffic Volumes - AM Peak Hour
0
199152
23
32
2
350139
43
145268
22
246
176
508
77
16277 74
3345
100641
54737
128785
675
72 215
90618
79
61149
28
265
8025699
4091
5134
48
138
889 6785
74
119
429
568
223
318
26
369
630
BOW
ERY
107
691302
366
501
510
50
789
244108
701
44
132
179
30679
166
285
272
459
221125
133293
143 398
34625
914
0
270
184
330
489
HESTER ST
CANAL ST
CANAL ST
CENT
RE S
TGRAND ST
HOWARD ST
BROOME ST
BRO
ADW
AY
LAFA
YETT
E ST
MER
CER
ST
CRO
SBY
ST
KENMARE ST
CENT
RE M
ARKE
T PL
GRAND ST
GRE
ENE
ST
SPRING ST
WO
OST
ER S
T
BROOME ST CLEV
ELAN
D PL
GRAND ST
SPRING ST
LAFA
YETT
E ST
ING ST
OOME ST
W B
ROAD
WAY
PEDE
STRI
AN ST
WARREN ST
MURRAY ST
PARK PL
BRO
ADW
AY
CHUR
CH S
T
REPUBLICAN AL
ELK
ST
MADISON ST
PARK
ROW
AVENUE OF THE FINEST
DUANE ST
READE ST
CHAMBERS ST
LAFA
YETT
E ST
FRANKLIN ST
LEONARD ST
CORT
LAND
T AL
FRAN
KLIN
PL
CHUR
CH S
T
WHITE ST
BRO
ADW
AY
WALKER ST
LISPENARD ST
CANAL ST
AVE OF THE AMERICAS
W B
ROAD
WAY
PEARL ST
HOGAN PL
LAFAYETTE ST
WORTH ST
CENT
RE S
T
BAXT
ER S
T
FOLE
Y SQ
THOMAS ST
TRIM
BLE
PL
SOUT
H ST
CORTLANDT ST MAIDEN LA
LIBERTY ST
LIBE
RTY
PL
JOHN ST
FULTON ST
DUTC
H ST
PLATT ST
PEAR
L ST
BEEKMAN ST
WAT
ER ST
FRON
T ST
JOHN ST
BARCLAY ST
VESEY ST
FULTON ST
DEY ST
DOVER ST
PECK SLIP
PECK SLIP
WAT
ER ST
FULTON ST
ANN ST THEA
TRE
AL
NASS
AU S
T
BEEKMAN ST
WIL
LIAM
STPA
RK ROW
SPRUCE ST
GOLD
ST
FRANKFORT ST
CLIFF
ST
CHUR
CH S
T
ROSE
ST
TRYO
N ROW
ALLE
N ST
DELANCEY STALLEN ST
FORS
YTH
ST
BOW
ERY
CHRY
STIE
ST.
RIVINGTON ST.
ST.J
AMES
PL.
JAMES ST
WORTH ST
MOSCO ST
R F WAGNER PL
CATHERINE ST.
PEARL ST.
PARK R
OW
CHAT
HAM
SQ
BAYARD ST.
MUL
BERR
Y ST
.
PELL ST.
DOYER ST
MO
TT S
T.
ELIZ
ABET
H ST
.
CHRY
STIE
ST.
BOW
ERY
FORSYTH ST.
CANAL ST.
ALLE
N ST
.
ORC
HARD
ST.
ELDR
IDG
E ST
.
FORS
YTH
ST.
HESTER ST.
CHERRY ST.
CATHERINE SLIP
WATER ST
.
MONROE ST.OLIVER ST.
HENRY ST.
PIKE ST.
MARKET ST.
E. BROADWAY
DIVISION ST.
41
63361
61184
75
94358 83
632790214
69 9410
92
131157
26230
789
114413
150
37 781
216
4995
6
302290
787
130
329
3061
82
750
98
11540
854173
147303
782
144
375
271
112
154
67
2058
6121
101
33114
182
224
144
130
324
123
104
505
8964
38 363
11737
5
11548
8
229
322
0
76
11
50
11
36398
30549
645
172
547503
349
123
182
168
503
59 493 211
474158
9
295
62 266
21
12867
7992
49
26963
29136
53 9634 279
33449
170
2558545
55445
10393
403
39
0
140
305
17
72
2
375
244
291
241
104
89
198290
30
94
37
114
4326
302 11924
212
NB FDR OFFRAMPDOVER ST
BROOKLYN BR ONRAMPFRANKFORT ST
FDR ONRAMP
14 161
116
39
46166
71
1123
6 48
65
FDR ONRAMP
BROOKLYN BR OFFRAMP
R F WAGNER PL
3312
525997
160266
344
316
361
363
70
438
49614
295
514
538
181
EAST
RIV
ER
BROOKLYN BRIDGE
BENS
ON
PL
CATHERINE LA
7
17
Figure 7-7b2006 With-Action Traffic Volumes - MD Peak Hour
Security Zone
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS
Analyzed Intersections (Signalized)Analyzed Intersections (Unsignalized)
Legend
317
437496
309187112
2935
325
115
643
R F WAGNER PL
BROOKLYN BR OFFRAMP
FDR ONRAMP
36
2431
210
80246140
507919
416
FDR ONRAMP
FRANKFORT ST
BROOKLYN BR ONRAMP
DOVER ST
NB FDR OFFRAMP
346
361
13134244
3747
605
149
45
59
50
111
585
310410
434
119
19630
723
3444
65
24
353
07
5
15522
316
8
125735
609
11725
190
36280
35728
5141
88270
124274
3672
141
93138
17427
44
304
8
190432279
640
66
589
180
107
76
276
436580
151
768
701
37
47627
9
48
20
104
0377
16
195
410
6235
062
496
46
6848
71210
520
760
347
5441
501
69 134
272
158
1094
10211
309
144
24 50
35
15
66 199
104
385
350
150
620
414104
146685
13862
56 659
84
4814
435
106
667
171266
1037
47
357
577
52 239
46686
703
30140
243130
1049
107
89
265958
53399
541133
57 269
90
70507
44
DIVISION ST.
E. BROADWAY
MARKET ST.
PIKE ST.
HENRY ST.
OLIVER ST.
MONROE ST.
WATER ST
.
CATHERINE SLIP
CHERRY ST.
SOUTH ST.
HESTER ST.
FORS
YTH
ST.
BROOME S
ELDR
IDG
E ST
.
LUDL
OW
ST.
ORC
HARD
ST.
ALLE
N ST
.
CANAL ST.
FORSYTH ST.
BOW
ERY
CHRY
STIE
ST.
ELIZ
ABET
H ST
.
MO
TT S
T.
DOYER ST
PELL ST.
MUL
BERR
Y ST
.
BAYARD ST.
CHAT
HAM
SQ
PARK R
OW
PEARL ST.
CATHERINE ST.
R F WAGNER PL
MOSCO ST
WORTH ST
JAMES ST
ST.J
AMES
PL.
RIVINGTON ST.
CHRY
STIE
ST.
BOW
ERY
FORS
YTH
ST
ALLEN ST
DELANCEY ST
ALLE
N ST
TRYO
N ROW
ROSE
ST
CHUR
CH S
T
CLIFF
ST
FRANKFORT ST
GOLD
ST
SPRUCE ST
PARK R
OW
WIL
LIAM
ST
BEEKMAN ST
NASS
AU S
T
THEA
TRE
AL
ANN ST
FULTON ST
WAT
ER ST
PECK SLIPPECK SLIP
DOVER ST
DEY ST
FULTON ST
VESEY ST
BARCLAY ST
JOHN ST
FRON
T STW
ATER
ST
BEEKMAN ST
PEAR
L ST
PLATT ST
DUTC
H ST
FULTON ST
JOHN ST
LIBE
RTY
PL
LIBERTY ST
MAIDEN LACORTLANDT ST
SOUT
H ST
TRIM
BLE
PL
THOMAS ST
FOLE
Y SQ
BAXT
ER S
T
CENT
RE S
T
WORTH ST
LAFAYETTE ST
HOGAN PL
PEARL ST
AVE OF THE AMERICAS
CANAL ST
LISPENARD ST
WALKER ST
BRO
ADW
AY
WHITE ST
CHUR
CH S
T
FRAN
KLIN
PL
CORT
LAND
T AL
LEONARD ST
FRANKLIN ST
LAFA
YETT
E ST
CHAMBERS ST
READE ST
DUANE ST
AVENUE OF THE FINEST
PARK
ROW
MADISON ST
ELK
ST
REPUBLICAN AL
CHUR
CH S
T
BRO
ADW
AY
PARK PL
MURRAY ST
WARREN ST
PEDE
STRI
AN ST
ME ST
G ST LAFA
YETT
E ST
SPRING ST
CLEV
ELAN
D PL
BROOME ST
WO
OST
ER S
T
SPRING ST
GRE
ENE
ST
GRAND ST
CENT
RE M
ARKE
T PL
KENMARE ST
CRO
SBY
ST
MER
CER
ST
LAFA
YETT
E ST
BRO
ADW
AY
BROOME ST
HOWARD ST
GRAND STCE
NTRE
ST
CANAL ST
CANAL ST
HESTER ST
494
339
141
239
11631
4
367
455
146
36077
107260
571
238
323
101
83201
165
13839 652
55334
703
50
46
696
522
596
167986
125
BOW
ERY
729
706
30 407
362
718
691
139
30 570
121637
194
52
131
1032
68
62350 61
139
18
25
26
49
16665
74
463101
86
53 644
110199
63932
381225
76 864352
285
62
847
156
180
15295 163
67
182674
249
61
6
54
3
133180
410
387
EAST
RIV
ER
BROOKLYN BRIDGE
BENS
ON
PL
CATHERINE LA
9
20
Figure 7-7c2006 With-Action Traffic Volumes - PM Peak Hour
Security Zone
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS
Analyzed Intersections (Signalized)Analyzed Intersections (Unsignalized)
Legend
Tab
le 7
-6:
2006
No
-Act
ion
an
d W
ith
-Act
ion
Tra
ffic
Co
nd
itio
ns
at S
ign
aliz
ed In
ters
ecti
on
s
SIG
NA
LIZ
ED
Lan
eV
/CD
elay
LO
SV
/CD
elay
LO
SL
ane
V/C
Del
ayL
OS
V/C
Del
ayL
OS
Lan
eV
/CD
elay
LO
SV
/CD
elay
LO
SIN
TE
RS
EC
TIO
NG
rou
pR
atio
(sec
/veh
)R
atio
(sec
/veh
)G
rou
pR
atio
(sec
/veh
)R
atio
(sec
/veh
)G
rou
pR
atio
(sec
/veh
)R
atio
(sec
/veh
)B
ow
ery
Co
rrid
or
1) B
ower
y (N
-S)
@N
B-D
efL
NB
-Def
L0.
9172
.3E
*0.
9172
.3E
NB
-Def
L1.
0310
2.4
F*
1.03
102.
4F
Ken
mar
e S
tree
t (E
-W)
NB
-TR
NB
-TR
0.58
26.7
C
0.58
26.7
CN
B-T
R0.
6427
.8C
0.
6427
.8C
NB
-LTR
0.94
42.9
D*
0.94
42.9
DN
B-L
TR
NB
-LTR
S
B-D
ef L
0.72
47.6
D
0.72
47.6
DS
B-D
ef L
0.86
48.7
D
0.86
48.7
DS
B-D
ef L
0.99
73.4
E*
0.99
73.4
ES
B-T
R0.
8938
.4D
0.
8938
.4D
SB
-TR
0.95
47.5
D*
0.95
47.5
DS
B-T
R0.
5517
.6B
0.
5517
.6B
EB
-LTR
0.33
19.6
B
0.33
19.6
BE
B-L
TR0.
4922
.0C
0.
4922
.0C
EB
-LTR
0.52
22.2
C
0.52
22.2
CW
B-L
1.03
91.5
F*
1.03
91.5
FW
B-L
0.78
47.5
D
0.78
47.5
DW
B-L
0.89
60.9
E*
0.89
60.9
EW
B-T
R0.
6625
.0C
0.
6625
.0C
WB
-TR
0.43
20.8
C
0.43
20.8
CW
B-T
R0.
3920
.2C
0.
3920
.2C
WB
-R1.
0081
.1F
*1.
0081
.1F
WB
-R0.
6430
.6C
0.
6430
.6C
WB
-R0.
8445
.1D
0.
8445
.1D
2)
Bow
ery
(N-S
) @
NB
-LT
0.97
38.6
D*
0.97
38.6
DN
B-L
T0.
7420
.6C
0.
7420
.6C
NB
-LT
0.90
31.5
C*
0.90
31.5
CB
room
e S
tree
t (E
-W)
SB
-TR
0.60
16.0
B
0.60
16.0
BS
B-T
R0.
6116
.4B
0.
6116
.4B
SB
-TR
0.68
17.7
B
0.68
17.7
BW
B-L
TR
0.61
31.4
C
0.61
31.4
CW
B-L
TR
0.51
29.0
C
0.51
29.0
CW
B-L
TR
0.60
31.9
C
0.60
31.9
C
3) B
ower
y (N
-S)
@N
B-T
0.95
33.9
C*
0.95
33.9
CN
B-T
0.51
14.3
B
0.51
14.3
BN
B-T
0.55
14.8
B
0.55
14.8
BG
rand
Str
eet (
E-W
)N
B-R
0.99
72.4
E*
0.99
72.4
EN
B-R
0.77
38.2
D
0.77
38.2
DN
B-R
0.62
24.6
C
0.62
24.6
CS
B-T
L0.
5114
.4B
0.
5114
.4B
SB
-TL
0.50
14.2
B
0.50
14.2
BS
B-T
L0.
5815
.5B
0.
5815
.5B
EB
-LTR
0.58
30.0
C
0.58
30.0
CE
B-L
TR0.
7941
.9D
0.
7941
.9D
EB
-LTR
0.79
41.3
D
0.79
41.3
D
4) B
ower
y (N
-S)
@N
B-T
0.62
33.9
C
0.62
33.9
CN
B-T
0.54
32.0
C
0.54
32.0
CN
B-T
0.39
29.3
C
0.39
29.3
CC
anal
Str
eet (
E-W
) +
SB
-Def
L0.
9667
.3E
*0.
9667
.3E
SB
-Def
L0.
7335
.7D
0.
7335
.7D
SB
-Def
L1.
0064
.3E
*1.
0064
.3E
SB
-TR
0.71
29.5
C
0.71
29.5
CS
B-T
R0.
7030
.0C
0.
7030
.0C
SB
-TR
0.40
20.7
C
0.40
20.7
CE
B-T
1.02
60.8
E*
1.02
60.8
EE
B-T
0.70
26.2
C
0.70
26.2
CE
B-T
0.91
38.1
D*
0.91
38.1
DE
B-R
0.47
25.3
C
0.47
25.3
CE
B-R
0.67
29.3
C
0.67
29.3
CE
B-R
0.20
18.1
B
0.20
18.1
BW
B-T
0.94
41.2
D*
0.94
41.2
DW
B-T
0.60
24.0
C
0.60
24.0
CW
B-T
0.44
20.7
C
0.44
20.7
C
5) B
ower
y (N
-S)
@N
B-T
0.30
16.7
B
0.30
16.7
BN
B-T
0.34
17.1
B
0.34
17.1
BN
B-T
0.44
18.3
B
0.44
18.3
BD
ivis
ion
Str
eet (
E-W
)N
B-R
0.02
14.2
B
0.02
14.2
BN
B-R
0.19
17.2
B
0.19
17.2
BN
B-R
0.07
15.0
B
0.07
15.0
BS
B-L
T0.
3217
.0B
0.
3217
.0B
SB
-LT
0.38
17.6
B
0.38
17.6
BS
B-L
T0.
3116
.8B
0.
3116
.8B
EB
-LTR
0.00
32.9
C
0.00
32.9
CE
B-L
TR0.
0633
.8C
0.
0633
.8C
EB
-LTR
0.07
34.0
C
0.07
34.0
CW
B-T
0.53
36.1
D
0.53
36.1
DW
B-T
0.46
33.6
C
0.47
34.1
CW
B-T
0.57
36.6
D
0.57
36.6
DW
B-R
0.70
26.6
C
0.70
26.6
CW
B-R
0.57
22.4
C
0.57
22.4
CW
B-R
1.02
63.5
E*
1.02
63.5
E
6) C
hath
am S
quar
e (N
-S)
@N
B-T
0.20
8.1
A
0.20
8.1
AN
B-T
0.22
8.2
A
0.22
8.2
AN
B-T
0.23
8.2
A
0.23
8.2
A
Eas
t Bro
adw
ay (
E-W
)N
B-R
0.73
26.4
C
0.73
26.4
CN
B-R
0.69
22.9
C
0.75
26.5
CN
B-R
0.65
19.7
B
0.65
19.9
B
SB
-L0.
6924
.6C
0.
6924
.6C
SB
-L0.
8845
.3D
0.
8845
.3D
SB
-L0.
6621
.7C
0.
6622
.2C
SB
-T0.
197.
9A
0.
197.
9A
SB
-T0.
187.
9A
0.
187.
9A
SB
-T0.
177.
8A
0.
177.
8A
WB
-L0.
5835
.1D
0.
5835
.1D
WB
-L0.
3428
.2C
0.
3428
.2C
WB
-L0.
3227
.6C
0.
3227
.7C
WB
-R0.
1826
.8C
0.
1826
.8C
WB
-R0.
3530
.8C
0.
3530
.8C
WB
-R0.
4433
.0C
0.
4533
.2C
7) C
hath
am S
quar
e (N
-S)
@N
B-T
R0.
2821
.9C
0.
0320
.3C
NB
-TR
0.37
24.4
C
0.07
20.7
CN
B-T
R0.
4124
.9C
0.
0420
.4C
Wor
th S
tree
t (E
-W)
SB
-L1.
0095
.1F
*0.
8966
.4E
SB
-L0.
8362
.9E
*0.
7043
.4D
SB
-L0.
7553
.9D
0.
5735
.5D
SB
-TR
0.93
63.8
E*
0.98
76.3
E*
SB
-TR
0.98
77.1
E*
1.01
86.7
F*
SB
-TR
0.96
68.8
E*
1.03
86.9
F*
EB
-Def
L
0.88
68.7
E*
EB
-Def
L0.
4627
.4C
0.
9059
.1E
*E
B-D
efL
0.55
31.1
C
1.04
92.8
F*
EB
-LTR
0.29
25.1
C
EB
-LTR
E
B-L
TR
EB
-TR
0.
2923
.1C
EB
-TR
0.23
22.1
C
0.23
22.1
CE
B-T
R0.
2622
.6C
0.
2622
.6C
WB
-LT
0.10
22.7
C
0.61
29.7
CW
B-L
T0.
1120
.5C
0.
3223
.4C
WB
-LT
0.10
20.5
C
0.38
24.4
C
WB
-R0.
6035
.8D
0.
9365
.1E
*W
B-R
0.76
45.9
D
0.91
61.4
E*
WB
-R0.
6635
.7D
1.
0592
.8F
*M
ott S
tree
t (E
-W)
EB
-LTR
0.71
58.3
E*
0.74
61.9
EE
B-L
TR0.
8778
.6E
*0.
8880
.9F
EB
-LTR
0.65
51.8
D
0.70
58.1
E*
NO
TE
S:
EB
-Eas
tbou
nd, W
B-W
estb
ound
, NB
-Nor
thbo
und,
SB
-Sou
thbo
und
L-Le
ft, T
-Thr
ough
, R-R
ight
, DfL
-Ana
lysi
s co
nsid
ers
a D
efac
to L
eft L
ane
on th
is a
ppro
ach
.
V/C
Rat
io -
Vol
ume
to C
apac
ity R
atio
, SE
C/V
EH
- S
econ
ds p
er v
ehic
le
LOS
- L
evel
of s
ervi
ce
*-D
enot
es C
onge
sted
Loc
atio
n in
the
2006
No-
Act
ion
Con
ditio
n
*-D
enot
es Im
pact
ed L
ocat
ion
in th
e 20
06 W
ith-A
ctio
n C
ondi
tion
Ana
lysi
s is
bas
ed o
n th
e 20
00 H
ighw
ay C
apac
ity M
anua
l Met
hodo
logy
(H
CS
200
0 4.
1f).
+-W
estb
ound
rig
ht m
ovem
ent a
t Can
al S
tree
t and
Bow
ery
is c
ontr
olle
d by
a s
epar
ate
sign
al a
s it
is a
cha
nnel
ized
rig
ht tu
rn
2006
No
-Act
ion
PM
Pea
k H
ou
r20
06 A
ctio
n P
M P
eak
Ho
ur
2006
No
-Act
ion
AM
Pea
k H
ou
r20
06 A
ctio
n A
M P
eak
Ho
ur
2006
No
-Act
ion
Mid
day
Pea
k H
ou
r20
06 A
ctio
n M
idd
ay P
eak
Ho
ur
Tab
le 7
-6:
2006
No
-Act
ion
an
d W
ith
-Act
ion
Tra
ffic
Co
nd
itio
ns
at S
ign
aliz
ed In
ters
ecti
on
s
SIG
NA
LIZ
ED
Lan
eV
/CD
elay
LO
SV
/CD
elay
LO
SL
ane
V/C
Del
ayL
OS
V/C
Del
ayL
OS
Lan
eV
/CD
elay
LO
SV
/CD
elay
LO
SIN
TE
RS
EC
TIO
NG
rou
pR
atio
(sec
/veh
)R
atio
(sec
/veh
)G
rou
pR
atio
(sec
/veh
)R
atio
(sec
/veh
)G
rou
pR
atio
(sec
/veh
)R
atio
(sec
/veh
)
2006
No
-Act
ion
PM
Pea
k H
ou
r20
06 A
ctio
n P
M P
eak
Ho
ur
2006
No
-Act
ion
AM
Pea
k H
ou
r20
06 A
ctio
n A
M P
eak
Ho
ur
2006
No
-Act
ion
Mid
day
Pea
k H
ou
r20
06 A
ctio
n M
idd
ay P
eak
Ho
ur
Bro
adw
ay C
orr
ido
r8)
Bro
adw
ay (
N-S
) @
SB
-LTR
0.94
41.8
D*
0.94
41.8
DS
B-L
TR0.
8130
.4C
0.
8130
.4C
SB
-LTR
0.63
26.3
C
0.63
26.3
C
Can
al S
tree
t (E
-W)
EB
-TR
0.88
34.4
C
0.88
34.4
CE
B-T
R0.
7227
.4C
0.
7227
.4C
EB
-TR
0.88
33.9
C
0.88
33.9
C
WB
-Def
L
WB
-Def
L
WB
-Def
L0.
3529
.2C
0.
3529
.2C
WB
-LT
0.71
18.5
B
0.71
18.5
BW
B-L
T0.
7120
.1C
0.
7120
.1C
WB
-LT
WB
-T
WB
-T
WB
-T0.
3212
.4B
0.
3212
.4B
9) B
road
way
(N
-S)
@S
B-L
TR0.
4615
.4B
0.
4615
.4B
SB
-LTR
0.53
12.8
B
0.53
12.8
BS
B-L
TR0.
5016
.0B
0.
5016
.0B
Wor
th S
tree
t (E
-W)
EB
-TR
0.52
25.2
C
0.61
27.6
CE
B-T
R0.
4923
.5C
0.
6026
.3C
EB
-TR
0.35
21.0
C
0.41
22.0
C
WB
-L0.
4025
.3C
0.
4427
.4C
WB
-L0.
5833
.7C
0.
6641
.3D
WB
-L0.
2521
.1C
0.
2621
.7C
WB
-T0.
6527
.9C
0.
6427
.6C
WB
-T0.
3020
.3C
0.
4322
.4C
WB
-T0.
5725
.3C
0.
5625
.0C
10)
Bro
adw
ay (
N-S
) @
SB
-T0.
6617
.6B
0.
6617
.6B
SB
-T0.
5911
.9B
0.
5911
.9B
SB
-T0.
4914
.4B
0.
4914
.4B
Tho
mas
Str
eet (
E-W
)S
B-R
0.34
15.7
B
0.34
15.7
BS
B-R
0.12
7.9
A
0.12
7.9
AS
B-R
0.26
14.3
B
0.26
14.3
B
11)
Bro
adw
ay (
N-S
) @
SB
-T0.
6619
.4B
0.
6619
.4B
SB
-T0.
5914
.1B
0.
5914
.1B
SB
-T0.
5517
.2B
0.
5517
.2B
Dua
ne S
tree
t (E
-W)
EB
-R0.
4524
.5C
0.
4524
.5C
EB
-R0.
5126
.0C
0.
5126
.0C
EB
-R0.
3621
.7C
0.
3621
.7C
12)
Bro
adw
ay (
N-S
) @
SB
-LT
1.01
59.0
E*
1.01
59.0
ES
B-L
T0.
8121
.0C
0.
8121
.0C
SB
-LT
0.80
26.0
C
0.81
26.5
C
Cha
mbe
rs S
tree
t (E
-W)
SB
-R0.
3225
.2C
0.
3225
.2C
SB
-R0.
1714
.3B
0.
1714
.3B
SB
-R0.
2415
.7B
0.
2415
.7B
EB
-TR
0.69
29.7
C
0.69
29.7
CE
B-T
R0.
6830
.1C
0.
6830
.1C
EB
-TR
0.63
25.8
C
0.63
25.8
C
WB
-LT
1.04
74.0
E*
1.04
74.0
EW
B-L
T0.
8033
.3C
0.
8033
.3C
WB
-LT
0.98
58.9
E*
0.98
58.9
E
13)
Bro
adw
ay (
N-S
) @
SB
-T0.
8229
.1C
0.
8229
.1C
SB
-T0.
5622
.2C
0.
5622
.2C
SB
-T0.
7125
.4C
0.
6824
.6C
Bar
clay
Str
eet (
E-W
)S
B-R
0.37
22.6
C
0.37
22.6
CS
B-R
0.18
18.8
B
0.18
18.8
BS
B-R
0.18
18.9
B
0.18
18.9
B
WB
-L0.
9999
.9F
*0.
9487
.3F
WB
-L1.
0097
.2F
*0.
9792
.1F
WB
-L0.
7253
.2D
0.
5842
.9D
WB
-LT
0.86
48.3
D
0.82
44.3
DW
B-L
T0.
8143
.1D
0.
6937
.5D
WB
-LT
0.58
34.4
C
0.53
33.2
C
14)
Bro
adw
ay (
N-S
) @
SB
-L0.
8233
.3C
0.
7830
.2C
SB
-L0.
7223
.8C
0.
7223
.8C
SB
-L0.
9446
.5D
*0.
8635
.7D
Ves
ey S
tree
t (E
-W)
SB
-T0.
6120
.7C
0.
6120
.6C
SB
-T0.
4515
.5B
0.
4315
.2B
SB
-T0.
4217
.7B
0.
3917
.4B
EB
-TR
1.00
93.6
F*
0.84
69.6
EE
B-T
R1.
0210
2.8
F*
0.78
61.0
EE
B-T
R0.
6550
.5D
0.
6249
.4D
15)
Bro
adw
ay (
N-S
) @
SB
-TR
0.50
10.6
B
0.50
10.5
BS
B-T
R0.
415.
6A
0.
405.
5A
SB
-TR
0.33
8.9
A
0.31
8.8
A
Ful
ton
Str
eet (
E-W
)W
B-L
T0.
2225
.9C
0.
3627
.7C
WB
-LT
0.33
27.5
C
0.33
27.5
CW
B-L
T0.
2025
.5C
0.
2726
.2C
NO
TE
S:
EB
-Eas
tbou
nd, W
B-W
estb
ound
, NB
-Nor
thbo
und,
SB
-Sou
thbo
und
L-Le
ft, T
-Thr
ough
, R-R
ight
, DfL
-Ana
lysi
s co
nsid
ers
a D
efac
to L
eft L
ane
on th
is a
ppro
ach
.
V/C
Rat
io -
Vol
ume
to C
apac
ity R
atio
, SE
C/V
EH
- S
econ
ds p
er v
ehic
le
LOS
- L
evel
of s
ervi
ce
*-D
enot
es C
onge
sted
Loc
atio
n in
the
2006
No-
Act
ion
Con
ditio
n
*-D
enot
es Im
pact
ed L
ocat
ion
in th
e 20
06 W
ith-A
ctio
n C
ondi
tion
Ana
lysi
s is
bas
ed o
n th
e 20
00 H
ighw
ay C
apac
ity M
anua
l Met
hodo
logy
(H
CS
200
0 4.
1f).
Tab
le 7
-6:
2006
No
-Act
ion
an
d W
ith
-Act
ion
Tra
ffic
Co
nd
itio
ns
at S
ign
aliz
ed In
ters
ecti
on
s
SIG
NA
LIZ
ED
Lan
eV
/CD
elay
LO
SV
/CD
elay
LO
SL
ane
V/C
Del
ayL
OS
V/C
Del
ayL
OS
Lan
eV
/CD
elay
LO
SV
/CD
elay
LO
SIN
TE
RS
EC
TIO
NG
rou
pR
atio
(sec
/veh
)R
atio
(sec
/veh
)G
rou
pR
atio
(sec
/veh
)R
atio
(sec
/veh
)G
rou
pR
atio
(sec
/veh
)R
atio
(sec
/veh
)
2006
No
-Act
ion
PM
Pea
k H
ou
r20
06 A
ctio
n P
M P
eak
Ho
ur
2006
No
-Act
ion
AM
Pea
k H
ou
r20
06 A
ctio
n A
M P
eak
Ho
ur
2006
No
-Act
ion
Mid
day
Pea
k H
ou
r20
06 A
ctio
n M
idd
ay P
eak
Ho
ur
Can
al C
orr
ido
r
16)
Lafa
yette
Str
eet (
N-S
) @
SB
-L0.
2528
.6C
0.
2528
.6C
SB
-L0.
3531
.3C
0.
3531
.3C
SB
-L0.
5439
.0D
0.
5439
.0D
Can
al S
tree
t (E
-W)
SB
-T0.
7340
.4D
0.
7340
.4D
SB
-T0.
4630
.5C
0.
4630
.5C
SB
-T0.
7039
.0D
0.
7039
.0D
SB
-R1.
0411
4.2
F*
1.04
114.
2F
SB
-R0.
4836
.8D
0.
4836
.8D
SB
-R0.
3833
.2C
0.
3833
.2C
EB
-TR
0.77
23.6
C
0.77
23.6
CE
B-T
R0.
6219
.7B
0.
6219
.7B
EB
-TR
0.70
21.2
C
0.70
21.2
C
WB
-LT
0.54
11.3
B
0.54
11.3
BW
B-L
T0.
389.
4A
0.
389.
4A
WB
-LT
0.32
8.9
A
0.32
8.9
A
17)
Cen
tre
Str
eet (
N-S
) @
NB
-LT
0.75
37.5
D
0.75
37.5
DN
B-L
T0.
5230
.3C
0.
5230
.3C
NB
-LT
0.68
34.1
C
0.68
34.1
C
Can
al S
tree
t (E
-W)
NB
-R0.
2127
.7C
0.
2127
.7C
NB
-R0.
1225
.5C
0.
1225
.5C
NB
-R0.
0925
.0C
0.
0925
.0C
EB
-DL
0.78
42.8
D
0.78
42.8
DE
B-D
L
EB
-DL
0.68
26.8
C
0.68
26.8
C
EB
-T0.
6112
.5B
0.
6112
.5B
EB
-T0.
9943
.5D
*0.
9943
.5D
EB
-T0.
5912
.1B
0.
5912
.2B
WB
-TR
0.70
23.4
C
0.70
23.4
CW
B-T
R0.
7426
.0C
0.
7426
.0C
WB
-TR
0.42
18.5
B
0.42
18.5
B
18)
Mul
berr
y S
tree
t (N
-S)
@N
B-L
TR0.
4427
.3C
0.
4427
.3C
NB
-LTR
0.49
28.5
C
0.49
28.5
CN
B-L
TR0.
6434
.1C
0.
6434
.1C
Can
al S
tree
t (E
-W)
EB
-LT
0.79
21.2
C
0.79
21.2
CE
B-L
T0.
7720
.1C
0.
7720
.1C
EB
-LT
0.96
36.1
D*
0.96
36.1
D
WB
-TR
0.79
20.9
C
0.79
20.9
CW
B-T
R0.
6416
.7B
0.
6416
.7B
WB
-TR
0.45
13.3
B
0.45
13.3
B
Cen
tre
Co
rrid
or
19)
Cen
tre
Str
eet (
N-S
) @
NB
-L0.
8833
.7C
0.
9444
.5D
NB
-L0.
9146
.9D
*0.
8942
.2D
NB
-L0.
9350
.2D
*0.
9147
.9D
Cha
mbe
rs S
tree
t (E
-W)
NB
-LT
0.29
10.1
B
0.43
11.6
BN
B-L
T0.
388.
8A
0.
479.
7A
NB
-LT
0.49
10.0
A
0.59
11.4
B
SB
-TR
0.28
25.5
C
0.39
27.0
CS
B-T
R0.
4027
.2C
0.
4427
.8C
SB
-TR
0.54
29.6
C
0.57
30.1
C
EB
-RT
0.75
36.1
D
0.75
36.1
DE
B-R
T0.
5129
.1C
0.
5129
.1C
EB
-RT
0.83
40.4
D
0.83
40.4
D
20)
Cen
tre
Str
eet (
N-S
) @
SB
-L0.
6212
.0B
0.
6212
.0B
SB
-L0.
5310
.6B
0.
5310
.6B
SB
-L0.
8722
.8C
0.
8722
.8C
Try
on R
ow -
Bro
okly
n B
ridge
(E
-W)
SB
-LT
0.08
6.1
A
0.18
6.9
AS
B-L
T0.
166.
7A
0.
207.
0A
SB
-LT
0.15
6.6
A
0.17
6.8
A
Ch
urc
h C
orr
ido
r
21)
Chu
rch
Str
eet (
N-S
) @
NB
-T0.
5917
.3B
0.
5917
.3B
NB
-T0.
5212
.7B
0.
4812
.2B
NB
-T0.
3313
.9B
0.
3313
.9B
Ful
ton
Str
eet (
E-W
)W
B-R
0.46
28.4
C
0.66
35.0
CW
B-R
0.32
25.0
C
0.32
25.0
CW
B-R
0.34
25.2
C
0.45
27.4
C
22)
Chu
rch
Str
eet (
N-S
) @
NB
-T0.
4613
.1B
0.
5414
.2B
NB
-T0.
398.
7A
0.
398.
7A
NB
-T0.
2811
.3B
0.
3011
.5B
Ves
ey S
tree
t (E
-W)
NB
-R0.
8743
.6D
0.
5620
.2C
NB
-R0.
7726
.5C
0.
349.
7A
NB
-R0.
3613
.9B
0.
3413
.6B
23)
Chu
rch
Str
eet (
N-S
) @
NB
-LT
0.54
9.9
A
0.59
10.8
BN
B-L
T0.
4212
.8B
0.
4212
.8B
NB
-LT
0.29
11.5
B
0.32
11.7
B
Bar
clay
Str
eet (
E-W
) W
B-T
R0.
3424
.5C
0.
4824
.8C
WB
-TR
0.36
23.0
C
0.31
22.4
CW
B-T
R0.
2822
.0C
0.
2822
.0C
24)
Chu
rch
Str
eet (
N-S
) @
NB
-LTR
0.77
24.8
C
0.85
27.8
CN
B-L
TR0.
6718
.9B
0.
6718
.9B
NB
-LTR
0.76
24.3
C
0.76
24.3
C
Cha
mbe
rs S
tree
t (E
-W)
EB
-LT
0.99
63.1
E*
0.99
63.1
EE
B-L
T0.
7631
.5C
0.
7631
.5C
EB
-LT
0.73
28.4
C
0.73
28.4
C
WB
-TR
0.99
58.5
E*
0.99
58.5
EW
B-T
R0.
6825
.1C
0.
6825
.1C
WB
-TR
0.73
27.0
C
0.73
27.0
C
25)
Chu
rch
Str
eet (
N-S
) @
NB
-LTR
0.62
15.5
B
0.69
17.0
BN
B-L
TR0.
6311
.3B
0.
6311
.3B
NB
-LTR
0.56
14.5
B
0.59
15.0
B
Wor
th S
tree
t (E
-W)
EB
-LT
0.29
22.5
C
0.29
22.5
CE
B-L
T0.
2822
.3C
0.
3723
.5C
EB
-LT
0.19
21.1
C
0.18
21.1
C
WB
-TR
0.94
57.9
E*
0.93
56.7
EW
B-T
R0.
5127
.7C
0.
6733
.0C
WB
-TR
0.79
38.1
D
0.77
37.2
D
NO
TE
S:
EB
-Eas
tbou
nd, W
B-W
estb
ound
, NB
-Nor
thbo
und,
SB
-Sou
thbo
und
L-Le
ft, T
-Thr
ough
, R-R
ight
, DfL
-Ana
lysi
s co
nsid
ers
a D
efac
to L
eft L
ane
on th
is a
ppro
ach
.
V/C
Rat
io -
Vol
ume
to C
apac
ity R
atio
, SE
C/V
EH
- S
econ
ds p
er v
ehic
le
LOS
- L
evel
of s
ervi
ce
*-D
enot
es C
onge
sted
Loc
atio
n in
the
2006
No-
Act
ion
Con
ditio
n
*-D
enot
es Im
pact
ed L
ocat
ion
in th
e 20
06 W
ith-A
ctio
n C
ondi
tion
Ana
lysi
s is
bas
ed o
n th
e 20
00 H
ighw
ay C
apac
ity M
anua
l Met
hodo
logy
(H
CS
200
0 4.
1f).
Tab
le 7
-6:
2006
No
-Act
ion
an
d W
ith
-Act
ion
Tra
ffic
Co
nd
itio
ns
at S
ign
aliz
ed In
ters
ecti
on
s
SIG
NA
LIZ
ED
Lan
eV
/CD
elay
LO
SV
/CD
elay
LO
SL
ane
V/C
Del
ayL
OS
V/C
Del
ayL
OS
Lan
eV
/CD
elay
LO
SV
/CD
elay
LO
SIN
TE
RS
EC
TIO
NG
rou
pR
atio
(sec
/veh
)R
atio
(sec
/veh
)G
rou
pR
atio
(sec
/veh
)R
atio
(sec
/veh
)G
rou
pR
atio
(sec
/veh
)R
atio
(sec
/veh
)
2006
No
-Act
ion
PM
Pea
k H
ou
r20
06 A
ctio
n P
M P
eak
Ho
ur
2006
No
-Act
ion
AM
Pea
k H
ou
r20
06 A
ctio
n A
M P
eak
Ho
ur
2006
No
-Act
ion
Mid
day
Pea
k H
ou
r20
06 A
ctio
n M
idd
ay P
eak
Ho
ur
Div
isio
n C
orr
ido
r
26)
Pik
e S
tree
t (N
-S)
@N
B-L
T0.
4812
.7B
0.
4812
.7B
NB
-LT
0.34
11.0
B
0.34
11.0
BN
B-L
T0.
5513
.7B
0.
5513
.7B
Div
isio
n S
tree
t (E
-W)
SB
-T0.
2910
.5B
0.
2910
.5B
SB
-T0.
2610
.2B
0.
2610
.2B
SB
-T0.
2810
.4B
0.
2810
.4B
SB
-R0.
5317
.2B
0.
5317
.2B
SB
-R0.
4414
.7B
0.
4414
.7B
SB
-R0.
4815
.4B
0.
4815
.4B
WB
-LT
R0.
2323
.9C
0.
2323
.9C
WB
-LT
R0.
3626
.5C
0.
3626
.5C
WB
-LT
R0.
4628
.5C
0.
4628
.5C
Eas
t B
road
way
Co
rrid
or
27)
For
syth
Str
eet (
N-S
) @
SB
-LR
0.53
33.5
C
0.53
33.5
CS
B-L
R0.
4430
.0C
0.
4430
.0C
SB
-LR
0.41
29.2
C
0.41
29.2
C
Eas
t Bro
adw
ay (
E-W
)E
B-L
T0.
4411
.6B
0.
4411
.6B
EB
-LT
0.47
11.9
B
0.47
11.9
BE
B-L
T0.
248.
8A
0.
4511
.7B
WB
-TR
0.28
9.2
A
0.28
9.2
AW
B-T
R0.
238.
7A
0.
238.
7A
WB
-TR
0.32
9.5
A
0.31
9.5
A
28)
Mar
ket S
tree
t (N
-S)
@N
B-L
TR0.
6131
.8C
0.
6131
.8C
NB
-LTR
0.68
35.8
D
0.68
35.8
DN
B-L
TR0.
3913
.5B
0.
3913
.5B
Eas
t Bro
adw
ay (
E-W
)E
B-L
T0.
5316
.2B
0.
5316
.2B
EB
-LT
0.28
11.6
B
0.28
11.6
BE
B-L
T0.
6530
.6C
0.
6530
.6C
WB
-TR
0.55
16.7
B
0.55
16.7
BW
B-T
R0.
4814
.9B
0.
4814
.9B
WB
-TR
1.02
79.6
E*
1.02
79.6
E
Fra
nkf
ort
Co
rrid
or
29)
Gol
d S
tree
t (N
-S)
@N
B-T
0.00
25.7
C
0.00
25.7
CN
B-T
0.00
25.7
C
0.00
25.7
CN
B-T
0.00
25.7
C
0.00
25.7
C
Fra
nkfo
rt S
tree
t (E
-W)
NB
-R0.
0025
.7C
0.
0025
.7C
NB
-R
NB
-R
EB
-TR
0.58
30.0
C
0.71
35.2
DE
B-T
R0.
6531
.6C
0.
6531
.6C
EB
-TR
0.71
35.5
D
0.79
40.4
D
WB
-L0.
1727
.3C
0.
2528
.2C
WB
-L0.
3029
.3C
0.
3129
.4C
WB
-L0.
1827
.8C
0.
4131
.4C
30)
Par
k R
ow (
N-S
) @
NB
-T0.
2712
.8B
0.
2212
.4B
NB
-T0.
2612
.7B
0.
2212
.4B
NB
-T0.
3013
.0B
0.
2712
.8B
Bee
kman
Str
eet (
E-W
)S
B-T
0.26
12.7
B
0.20
12.2
BS
B-T
0.21
12.2
B
0.16
11.9
BS
B-T
0.18
12.0
B
0.15
11.8
B
WB
-LR
0.57
26.8
C
0.72
31.9
CW
B-L
R0.
6127
.5C
0.
7633
.8C
WB
-LR
0.55
25.9
C
0.56
26.3
C
31)
Par
k R
ow (
N-S
) @
NB
-TR
0.40
22.3
C
0.24
8.2
AN
B-T
R0.
288.
5A
0.
288.
5A
NB
-TR
0.47
10.4
B
0.43
10.1
B
Spr
uce
Str
eet (
E-W
)S
B-L
0.55
19.7
B
0.39
2.2
AS
B-L
0.18
0.8
A
0.18
0.8
AS
B-L
0.20
1.6
A
0.20
1.4
A
SB
-T0.
4523
.3C
0.
268.
5A
SB
-T0.
288.
6A
0.
228.
2A
SB
-T0.
248.
3A
0.
218.
1A
NO
TE
S:
EB
-Eas
tbou
nd, W
B-W
estb
ound
, NB
-Nor
thbo
und,
SB
-Sou
thbo
und
L-Le
ft, T
-Thr
ough
, R-R
ight
, DfL
-Ana
lysi
s co
nsid
ers
a D
efac
to L
eft L
ane
on th
is a
ppro
ach
.
V/C
Rat
io -
Vol
ume
to C
apac
ity R
atio
, SE
C/V
EH
- S
econ
ds p
er v
ehic
le
LOS
- L
evel
of s
ervi
ce
*-D
enot
es C
onge
sted
Loc
atio
n in
the
2006
No-
Act
ion
Con
ditio
n
*-D
enot
es Im
pact
ed L
ocat
ion
in th
e 20
06 W
ith-A
ctio
n C
ondi
tion
Ana
lysi
s is
bas
ed o
n th
e 20
00 H
ighw
ay C
apac
ity M
anua
l Met
hodo
logy
(H
CS
200
0 4.
1f).
Tab
le 7
-6:
2006
No
-Act
ion
an
d W
ith
-Act
ion
Tra
ffic
Co
nd
itio
ns
at S
ign
aliz
ed In
ters
ecti
on
s
SIG
NA
LIZ
ED
Lan
eV
/CD
elay
LO
SV
/CD
elay
LO
SL
ane
V/C
Del
ayL
OS
V/C
Del
ayL
OS
Lan
eV
/CD
elay
LO
SV
/CD
elay
LO
SIN
TE
RS
EC
TIO
NG
rou
pR
atio
(sec
/veh
)R
atio
(sec
/veh
)G
rou
pR
atio
(sec
/veh
)R
atio
(sec
/veh
)G
rou
pR
atio
(sec
/veh
)R
atio
(sec
/veh
)
2006
No
-Act
ion
PM
Pea
k H
ou
r20
06 A
ctio
n P
M P
eak
Ho
ur
2006
No
-Act
ion
AM
Pea
k H
ou
r20
06 A
ctio
n A
M P
eak
Ho
ur
2006
No
-Act
ion
Mid
day
Pea
k H
ou
r20
06 A
ctio
n M
idd
ay P
eak
Ho
ur
Pea
rl C
orr
ido
r
32)
Pea
rl S
tree
t (N
-S)
@N
B-L
T0.
7222
.5C
0.
7724
.7C
NB
-LT
0.77
24.2
C
0.69
21.1
CN
B-L
T0.
8932
.0C
0.
8730
.6C
Ful
ton
Str
eet (
E-W
)S
B-T
0.43
16.1
B
0.55
18.5
BS
B-T
0.46
16.5
B
0.49
17.0
BS
B-T
0.67
21.4
C
0.66
21.1
C
SB
-R0.
1312
.8B
0.
1413
.0B
SB
-R0.
1112
.5B
0.
1112
.5B
SB
-R0.
0711
.8B
0.
0711
.7B
EB
-LR
0.66
43.4
D
0.66
42.3
DE
B-L
R0.
7248
.4D
0.
7248
.4D
EB
-LR
0.49
34.4
C
0.49
35.2
D
33)
Pea
rl S
tree
t (N
-S)
@N
B-D
efL
0.
8344
.9D
NB
-Def
L
NB
-Def
L0.
9762
.4E
*0.
9353
.6D
Fra
nkfo
rt S
tree
t (E
-W)
NB
-TR
0.
6014
.6B
NB
-TR
N
B-T
R0.
5212
.3B
0.
5212
.3B
NB
-LTR
0.62
14.2
B
NB
-LTR
0.44
11.0
B
0.45
11.1
BN
B-L
TR
SB
-LTR
0.46
11.0
B
0.64
13.6
BS
B-L
TR0.
359.
8A
0.
3910
.1B
SB
-LTR
0.55
12.3
B
0.51
11.7
B
EB
-L0.
9269
.7E
*0.
9983
.8F
*E
B-L
0.89
59.1
E*
0.96
72.0
E*
EB
-L0.
9267
.3E
*0.
9984
.1F
*E
B-T
R0.
8054
.1D
0.
8358
.0E
EB
-TR
0.71
41.1
D
0.75
43.8
DE
B-T
R0.
7950
.7D
0.
9579
.1E
*W
B-L
TR
0.85
52.3
D
0.85
52.3
DW
B-L
TR
0.11
24.0
C
0.12
24.1
CW
B-L
TR
0.16
24.6
C
0.32
26.7
C
34)
Pea
rl S
tree
t (N
-S)
@N
B-L
TR0.
6324
.0C
0.
7026
.0C
NB
-LTR
0.30
18.0
B
0.33
18.4
BN
B-L
TR0.
3017
.9B
0.
3218
.2B
Rob
ert F
Wag
ner
Sr.
Pla
ce (
E-W
)SB
-TR
0.53
22.1
C
0.38
19.0
BS
B-T
R0.
3318
.5B
0.
3719
.0B
SB
-TR
0.37
18.8
B
0.38
19.0
B
EB
-LTR
0.88
55.9
E*
0.88
55.9
EE
B-L
TR0.
7143
.6D
0.
8352
.9D
*E
B-L
TR1.
0488
.7F
*1.
0488
.7F
WB
-L0.
7944
.3D
1.
0586
.1F
*W
B-L
0.74
43.1
D
0.74
43.1
DW
B-L
0.72
41.5
D
0.58
37.2
D
WB
-RT
0.12
31.1
C
0.12
31.1
CW
B-R
T0.
0530
.2C
0.
0530
.2C
WB
-RT
0.04
30.0
C
0.04
30.0
C
WB
-R0.
3116
.2B
0.
2815
.7B
WB
-R0.
2915
.9B
0.
2915
.9B
WB
-R0.
4838
.2D
0.
1514
.2B
35)
Pea
rl S
tree
t (N
-S)
@N
B-D
efL
0.67
18.7
B
NB
-Def
L
NB
-Def
L0.
6218
.2B
St.
Jam
es P
lace
(E
-W)
NB
-T0.
4812
.5B
0.
4911
.4B
NB
-T
0.33
9.6
AN
B-T
0.30
9.7
A
0.29
9.2
A
NB
-LT
N
B-L
T0.
3710
.1B
N
B-L
T
SB
-T0.
248.
8A
0.
238.
7A
SB
-T0.
198.
4A
0.
228.
6A
SB
-T0.
208.
4A
0.
208.
4A
St.
Jam
es C
orr
ido
r
36)
St.
Jam
es P
lace
(N
-S)
@N
B-T
R0.
5221
.2C
0.
8029
.2C
NB
-TR
0.42
18.9
B
0.57
21.2
CN
B-T
R0.
3317
.4B
0.
5320
.1C
Mad
ison
Str
eet (
E-W
)S
B-L
T0.
5522
.2C
0.
5723
.2C
SB
-LT
0.50
21.0
C
0.51
21.4
CS
B-L
T0.
4319
.5B
0.
4520
.0B
WB
-L
0.19
15.8
BW
B-L
0.
1515
.4B
WB
-L
0.23
16.2
B
WB
-LT
R0.
1315
.0B
W
B-L
TR
0.09
14.6
B
WB
-LT
R0.
1715
.3B
WB
-R
0.04
14.3
BW
B-R
0.
0414
.4B
WB
-R
0.06
14.6
B
Wo
rth
Str
eet
Co
rrid
or
37)
Cen
tre
Str
eet (
N-S
) @
NB
-L1.
0592
.4F
*0.
9376
.2E
NB
-L1.
0411
0.3
F*
0.98
97.7
FN
B-L
1.05
96.3
F*
0.72
45.1
D
Wor
th S
tree
t (E
-W)
NB
-TR
0.73
32.3
C
0.75
33.4
CN
B-T
R0.
5828
.0C
0.
5327
.0C
NB
-TR
0.64
29.4
C
0.70
31.5
C
EB
-Def
L
0.38
24.3
CE
B-D
efL
E
B-D
efL
EB
-T0.
2310
.7B
0.
2711
.4B
EB
-T0.
3211
.6B
0.
4012
.6B
EB
-T0.
2811
.1B
0.
3612
.0B
WB
-TR
0.18
16.2
B
0.80
32.0
CW
B-T
R0.
2016
.5B
0.
6023
.7C
WB
-TR
0.23
16.9
B
0.58
22.9
C
38)
Lafa
yette
Str
eet (
N-S
)S
B-L
TR0.
4420
.8C
0.
4420
.8C
SB
-LTR
0.40
20.4
C
0.40
20.4
CS
B-L
TR0.
4821
.4C
0.
5522
.6C
Wor
th S
tree
t (E
-W)
EB
-TR
0.23
20.5
C
0.29
21.1
CE
B-T
R0.
4723
.7C
0.
5424
.9C
EB
-TR
0.35
21.7
C
0.38
22.2
C
WB
-L0.
1614
.0B
0.
4821
.0C
WB
-L0.
1515
.1B
0.
2818
.6B
WB
-L0.
1914
.9B
0.
2616
.7B
WB
-T0.
6522
.1C
0.
6421
.9C
WB
-T0.
3315
.4B
0.
4517
.3B
WB
-T0.
5118
.4B
0.
4817
.8B
NO
TE
S:
EB
-Eas
tbou
nd, W
B-W
estb
ound
, NB
-Nor
thbo
und,
SB
-Sou
thbo
und
L-Le
ft, T
-Thr
ough
, R-R
ight
, DfL
-Ana
lysi
s co
nsid
ers
a D
efac
to L
eft L
ane
on th
is a
ppro
ach
.V
/C R
atio
- V
olum
e to
Cap
acity
Rat
io, S
EC
/VE
H -
Sec
onds
per
veh
icle
LOS
- L
evel
of s
ervi
ce*
-Den
otes
Con
gest
ed L
ocat
ion
in th
e 20
06 N
o-A
ctio
n C
ondi
tion
*-D
enot
es Im
pact
ed L
ocat
ion
in th
e 20
06 W
ith-A
ctio
n C
ondi
tion
Ana
lysi
s is
bas
ed o
n th
e 20
00 H
ighw
ay C
apac
ity M
anua
l Met
hodo
logy
(H
CS
200
0 4.
1f).
Tab
le 7
-6:
2006
No
-Act
ion
an
d W
ith
-Act
ion
Tra
ffic
Co
nd
itio
ns
at U
nsi
gn
aliz
ed In
ters
ecti
on
s
UN
SIG
NA
LIZE
DL
ane
V/C
Del
ayL
OS
V/C
Del
ayL
OS
Lan
eV
/CD
elay
LO
SV
/CD
elay
LO
SL
ane
V/C
Del
ayL
OS
V/C
Del
ayL
OS
INT
ER
SE
CT
ION
Gro
up
Rat
io(s
ec/v
eh)
Rat
io(s
ec/v
eh)
Gro
up
Rat
io(s
ec/v
eh)
Rat
io(s
ec/v
eh)
Gro
up
Rat
io(s
ec/v
eh)
Rat
io(s
ec/v
eh)
Bax
ter
Co
rrid
or
1) B
axte
r S
tree
t (N
-S)
@E
B-T
R0.
4622
.9C
0.46
22.9
CE
B-T
R0.
6227
.2D
0.62
27.2
DE
B-T
R0.
9567
.7F
*0.
9567
.7F
Wal
ker
Str
eet (
E-W
)
2) B
axte
r S
tree
t (N
-S)
@E
B-L
T0.
017.
6A
0.00
8.5
AE
B-L
T0.
007.
5A
0.01
8.0
AE
B-L
T0.
017.
6A
0.01
8.1
AW
orth
Str
eet (
E-W
)
NO
TE
S:
EB
-Eas
tbou
nd, W
B-W
estb
ound
, NB
-Nor
thbo
und,
SB
-Sou
thbo
und
L-Le
ft, T
-Thr
ough
, R-R
ight
, DfL
-Ana
lysi
s co
nsid
ers
a D
efac
to L
eft L
ane
on th
is a
ppro
ach
.V
/C R
atio
- V
olum
e to
Cap
acity
Rat
io, S
EC
/VE
H -
Sec
onds
per
veh
icle
LOS
- L
evel
of s
ervi
ce*
-Den
otes
Con
gest
ed L
ocat
ion
in th
e 20
06 N
o-A
ctio
n C
ondi
tion
*-D
enot
es Im
pact
ed L
ocat
ion
in th
e 20
06 W
ith-A
ctio
n C
ondi
tion
Ana
lysi
s is
bas
ed o
n th
e 20
00 H
ighw
ay C
apac
ity M
anua
l Met
hodo
logy
(H
CS
200
0 4.
1f).
2006
No
-Act
ion
PM
Pea
k H
ou
r20
06 A
ctio
n P
M P
eak
Ho
ur
2006
No
-Act
ion
AM
Pea
k H
ou
r20
06 A
ctio
n A
M P
eak
Ho
ur
2006
No
-Act
ion
Mid
day
Pea
k H
ou
r20
06 A
ctio
n M
idd
ay P
eak
Ho
ur
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS Chapter 7: Traffic and Parking
7-13
Impact Analysis Methodology
Based on the thresholds established for signalized intersections in the CEQR Technical Manual,if a No-Action LOS A, B or C deteriorates to unacceptable mid-LOS D, or a LOS E or F in thefuture action condition, then a significant traffic impact has occurred. The CEQR TechnicalManual further states that for a No-Action LOS A, B or C, which declines to mid-LOS D (45seconds) or worse under the With-Action condition, mitigation to mid-LOS D is required. Fora No-Action mid-LOS D, an increase of five or more seconds of delay in a lane group in theWith-Action condition should be considered significant. For No-Action LOS E, an increase indelay of four seconds of delay should be considered significant. For No-Action LOS F, threeseconds of delay should be considered significant; however, if a No-Action LOS F conditionalready has delays in excess of 120 seconds, an increase of 1.0 second in delay should beconsidered significant, unless the action would generate fewer than five vehicles through that lanegroup in the peak hour. These impact criteria are also applicable to unsignalized intersections.However, for the minor street to trigger a significant impact, 90 passenger-car-equivalents mustbe identified in the With-Action condition in any peak hour.
Table 7-6 shows the AM, midday, and PM peak hour volume-to-capacity ratios, delays and levelsof service at signalized and unsignalized study area intersections, respectively, in the 2006 With-Action condition. The tables also identify those locations that would be impacted based on thecriteria discussed above. A summary of significantly impacted intersections is provided in Table7-7.
Signalized Intersections
As shown in Table 7-7, the AM, midday, and PM peak hours have three impacted intersectionseach. The following provides a discussion of the impacted locations by corridor. Measures tomitigate traffic impacts are presented in Chapter 11, “Mitigation.”
Pearl Street: At the intersection of Pearl Street and Frankfort Street, the eastbound left turnmovement is impacted by the action in the AM, midday, and PM peak hours, operating at LOSF (83.8 seconds of delay), versus a No-Action LOS E (69.7 seconds of delay), operating at LOSE (72.0 seconds of delay), versus a No-Action LOS E (59.1 seconds), and operating at LOS F(84.1 seconds of delay), versus a No-Action LOS E (67.3 seconds of delay), respectively. Theeastbound thru-right approach at this intersection would also be impacted in the PM peak houroperating at LOS E (79.1 seconds of delay), versus a No-Action LOS D (50.7 seconds of delay),respectively.
At Pearl Street and Robert F. Wagner Place, the westbound left turn movement would beimpacted in the AM peak hour, operating at LOS F (86.1 seconds of delay), versus a No-Action
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS Chapter 7: Traffic and Parking
7-14
LOS D (44.3 seconds of delay). The eastbound approach at this intersection would also beimpacted in the midday peak hour, operating at LOS D (52.9 seconds of delay), versus a No-Action LOS D (43.6 seconds of delay).
TABLE 7-7Summary of Impacted IntersectionsSignalized Intersections AM MD PMPearl Street @ Frankfort Street X X X
Robert F. Wagner Sr. Place X X
Chatham Square @ Worth Street X X XMott Street X
X impacts to one or more movements in the peak hour.
Chatham Square: At the intersection of Chatham Square and Worth Street, the Bowerysouthbound thru-right approach would be impacted in all three peak hours, deteriorating to LOSE (76.3 seconds of delay) in the AM, LOS F (86.7 seconds of delay) in the midday, and LOS F(86.9 seconds of delay) in the PM. The eastbound Worth Street left turn movement at thisintersection would also be impacted in all three peak hours, deteriorating to LOS E (68.7 secondsof delay) in the AM, LOS E (59.1 seconds of delay) in midday, and LOS F (92.8 seconds ofdelay) in the PM. The westbound St. James Place right turn movement would also be impactedat this intersection in all three peak hours, deteriorating to LOS E (65.1 seconds of delay) in theAM, LOS E (61.4 seconds of delay) in the midday, and LOS F ( 92.8 seconds of delay) in thePM.
At Chatham Square at Mott Street, the Mott Street approach would also be impacted in the PMpeak hour operating at LOS E (58.1 seconds of delay), versus a No-Action LOS D (51.8 secondsof delay).
Unsignalized Intersections
As shown in Table 7-6, neither of the two unsignalized intersections analyzed as part of this studywould be impacted by project diverted traffic in any peak hour.
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS Chapter 7: Traffic and Parking
7-15
Chapter 11, “Mitigation,” provides a detailed assessment of mitigation options for these impactedintersections.
Traffic Simulation
Traffic modeling was performed within the vicinity of the security zone (Worth Street,Broadway, Centre Street, Pearl Street, St. James Street, and Frankfort Street) with SynchroVersion 6.0 to identify traffic patterns in the No-Action and With-Action conditions. The trafficmodel is a computer based tool by which the flow of traffic is modeled and simulated. Themodeling and simulation were performed to determine the points of congestion in the currentroad network and to propose solutions to improve the traffic flow by providing alternative useof the existing road networks and modification of signal timing and road lane geometry.
A traffic model was created to show traffic flow conditions in the No-Action condition and in theWith-Action condition. The simulation of the No-Action and With-Action traffic flow conditionsprovides a visual representation of how the street closures have affected congestion and trafficqueuing in the vicinity of the security zone in the AM, midday, and PM peak hours. The trafficsimulation showed heavy congestion and long traffic queues at the impacted intersections listedin Table 7-7 above. Traffic simulation and modeling was also utilized in testing the feasibilityof different mitigation measures to alleviate the significant adverse impacts created by the action.These mitigation measures are described in detail in Chapter 11, “Mitigation.”
Parking
Off-Street Parking
An inventory of current parking conditions was conducted in 2006 for all off-street publicparking facilities within a quarter-mile radius of the security zone. As discussed above under“2006 No-Action Condition,” it is assumed that off-street parking facilities in the 2006 No-Action condition would not be different from the 2006 With-Action condition as the security planhas not resulted in changes to off-street public parking facilities.
As shown in Table 7-5 above, there are 37 off-street parking facilities within a quarter-mileradius of the security zone containing 4,409 spaces (see Figure 7-6 for 2006 off-street parkinglocations). The surveyed occupancy of these spaces at midday was approximately 86 percent,with 596 available spaces. Table 7-8 indicates that since the 400-space municipal garage wasclosed in 2001, the number of off-street public parking spaces has decreased to 4,409 versus4,711 under baseline conditions, as shown in Table 7-3.
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS Chapter 7: Traffic and Parking
7-16
Table 7-8: Baseline vs. With-Action Off-Street Parking Capacity and Utilization
Capacity Utilization Available Spaces
Baseline Condition 4,711 88% 566
With-Action Condition 4,409 86% 596
As the security plan neither creates demand for public parking nor eliminates any of the off-streetpublic parking supply, no significant adverse impacts in off-street parking have occurred as aresult of the implementation of the security plan.
On-Street Parking
As with the baseline and No-Action conditions, legal on-street parking is very limited within thestudy area in the 2006 With-Action condition. Curbside regulations vary greatly, and mostblockfronts have more than one regulation in effect. Most of the regulations change at differenttimes of the day and night and are different on weekdays and weekends. Curbside parkingregulations within the study area were surveyed in January 2006 and are shown in Figure 7-8.Within the security zone, on-street parking is permitted for authorized vehicles only, with theexception of Park Row where no on-street parking is permitted for any vehicles.
As shown in Figure 7-8, street regulations in the historic Chinatown core tend to be highlyrestrictive. During the daytime, many areas are limited to standing only by trucks loading andunloading. Narrow streets often have no standing anytime on one side, and busy streets oftenrestrict any standing during peak traffic periods. Where parking is permitted, it is generallymetered, limited to one or two hours. The blocks in the vicinity of government facilities limitparking to authorized police or court officer vehicles only. In this area, residential parkingcompetes with parking by shoppers and diners, freight unloading at stores, and vendors’ vehiclesparked on various streets. Due to the high number of visitors driving to this area, this section ofthe study area has the most intense parking demand, and is also busy on weeknights andweekends. This competition for public parking spaces in the area is exacerbated by the demandfor parking by police and court officers, who have special parking privileges.
Field surveys of weekday utilization of on-street parking capacity were conducted in January2006. The surveys focused on the weekday midday period, and included all legal curbside spaceswithin a quarter-mile of the security zone area. In order to take a closer look at on-street parking,the area within a quarter-mile of the security zone was divided into four zones, as shown inFigure 7-9. As seen in Table 7-9, during the weekday midday period the number of legalcurbside public parking spaces within the total study area totals approximately 426. Utilization
BOW
ERY
HESTER ST
ELIZ
ABET
H ST
MO
TT S
T
MUL
BERR
Y STCANAL ST
CANAL ST
BAXT
ER S
T
CENT
RE S
TGRAND ST
HOWARD ST
BROOME ST
BRO
ADW
AY
LAFA
YETT
E ST
MER
CER
ST CRO
SBY
ST
KENMARE ST
CENT
RE M
ARKE
T PL
GRAND ST
GRE
ENE
ST
SPRING ST
WO
OST
ER S
T
BROOME ST
CLEV
ELAN
D PL
GRAND ST
THO
MPS
ON
ST
PRINCE ST
SPRING ST
LAFA
YETT
E ST
PRINCE ST
SPRING ST
BROOME ST
W B
ROAD
WAY
PEDE
STRIA
N ST
WARREN ST
MURRAY ST
PARK PL
BRO
ADW
AY
CHUR
CH S
T
W B
ROAD
WAY
MAN
HATT
AN A
L
REPUBLICAN AL
ELK
ST
CENT
RE S
T
MADISON ST
CARD
INAL H
AYES
PLPA
RK RO
W
AVENUE OF THE FINEST
DUANE ST
READE ST
CHAMBERS ST
HUDS
ON ST
LAFA
YETT
E ST
CATHERINE LA
BENS
ON
PL
FRANKLIN ST
LEONARD ST
CORT
LAND
T AL
FRAN
KLIN
PL
CHUR
CH S
T
WHITE ST
BRO
ADW
AY
WALKER ST
LISPENARD ST
CANAL ST
AVE OF THE AMERICAS
W B
ROAD
WAY
PEARL ST
HOGAN PL
BAXTER ST
VARI
CK ST
BEACH STBEACH ST
SAINT JOHNS LA
YORK ST
POLI
CE P
Z
LAFA
YETT
E ST
WORTH ST
CENT
RE S
T
BAXT
ER S
T
FOLE
Y SQ
THOMAS ST
TRIM
BLE
PL
BRO
ADW
AY
PINE ST
WALL ST
FRON
T ST
SOUT
H ST
CORTLANDT ST
THAMES ST
TRIN
ITY
PL
CEDAR ST
GREE
NWIC
H ST
THAMES STALBANY ST
CARLISLE ST
CEDAR ST
MAIDEN LA
LIBERTY ST
LIBE
RTY
PL
JOHN ST
FULTON ST
DUTC
H ST
PLATT ST
RYDE
RS A
L
PEAR
L ST
BEEKMAN ST
WAT
ER ST
FRON
T ST
FLETCHER ST
JOHN ST
FLETCHER ST
BARCLAY ST
VESEY ST
FULTON ST
DEY ST
DOVER ST
PECK SLIP
PECK SLIP
ROBERT F WAGNER SR PL
NASS
AU S
T
CEDAR ST
WIL
LIAM
ST
RECTOR ST
PINE ST
MAIDEN LA
WAT
ER ST
FULTON ST
ANN ST
THEA
TRE A
L
NASS
AU S
T
BEEKMAN ST
WIL
LIAM
ST
PARK R
OW
SPRUCE ST
GOLD
ST
GO
LD S
T
PACE
PZ
FRANKFORT ST
FRANKFORT ST
CLIFF
ST
CHUR
CH S
T
BROOKLYN BRIDGE
EAST
RIV
ER
ROSE
ST
TRYON ROW
ALLE
N ST
ALLEN ST
DELANCEY ST
ALLE
N ST
ALLEN ST
FORS
YTH
ST
BOW
ERY
CHRY
STIE
ST.
ELDR
IDG
E ST
.
ALLE
N ST
.
ORC
HARD
ST
LUDL
OW
ST.
ESSE
X ST
.
NORF
OLK
ST
RIVINGTON ST.
ST.J
AMES
PL.
JAMES ST
BAXT
ER S
T
THOMAS PAINE ST.
MOSCO ST
R F WAGNER PL
CATHERINE ST.
PEAR
L ST
.
PEARL ST.
PARK R
OW
CHAT
HAM
SQ
BAYARD ST.
MUL
BERR
Y ST
.
PELL ST.
DOYER ST
MO
TT S
T.
ELIZ
ABET
H ST
.
GRAND ST.
CHRY
STIE
ST.
HESTER ST.
BOW
ERY
FORSYTH ST.
CANAL ST.
ALLE
N ST
.
ORC
HARD
ST.
LUDL
OW
ST.
ESSE
X ST
ELDR
IDG
E ST
.
BROOME ST
FORS
YTH
ST.
HESTER ST.
SOUTH ST.
CHERRY ST.
CATHERINE SLIP
MARKET SLIP
WATER ST.
MONROE ST.
OLIVER ST.CATHERINE ST
HENRY ST.PIKE ST.
MARKET ST.
E. BROADWAY
DIVISION ST.
MADISON ST.
BROOKLYN BRIDGE
2
2
22 2
2 2
2 22
2
2
2
2
33
34
34
1
232
33
363534
32
32
2
32
37
37343536
343536
32
2
32
2 3837
32
39
363534
33
233
39
2
39
33
3336 2
2
32
32
33333536
32
32
3246
3635
1132
32
41
38
30
32
3238
41
34
41
38
41
38
41
3642
42
3243
32
32
4242
42
42 42
32
42
42 42
42
2
2
42
42
44
4242
4232
2
42 42
42
423244
45 41
42
32 42
42
42
44
44
44
2 32
44
32
32
1 1
1 1
11
44
32 33
3238
44
32
36
32
3232
44 32
2
233 33
39
32
321
12
2
2
2
25
31
31
1
1
25
2 25
25
1
1
25
2
3333
32
2
25
25
2
3136
2
46
32
32
47
2
2
2
2
2
32
30
30
2
312
46
46 31
47
31
47
48
32
31
2
2
2
2 2
2
2
32
32 2
25
32
32
32
2
2
2 22
32
2 2253
2
2
22
22
2
2
22
25
25
25
25
25
33
33
33 33
33
33
33
31
42
32
3841
32
32
324138
46
34 3441
46
42
42
32 41
30
2
39
42
39
32
39
42
42
41
32
42
42
41
45
42
54
41 45
4541
32
42
242
4541
43
26 27
2342
221
1
1 1
2
2
32
42
4146
42
55 55
17
41
45
172 232
2
17
21
31 25
29
33
29
29
33
48
2
22
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
232
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
2
2
21
494145
4145
32
32
4145
22
233
3133
3232
46
22
49
3333
33
22 2
2 2
51
57
2
2
2 2
11
22
2
2
2 2
2
29
29
22
2
2
9
9
21
17
17
243
3 28
4215
6
1
3
6
311
25
26 27
23
21 6
6
161015
10 11
6
10
11
2
624
17
17
10
1112 2
17
23
16616
1110 6
1513
16
11101110
1110
6
6
1
2
15
13
113
16
311
10
17
6
1717
25 25
9 6
6 6
22
932
21
2
2
2
1
12
1
12
22
40
39
52
57
22
4040
11
1
2
12
57
32
32
6
40
5740
4145
1
1
2
4541
4545
32
4145
452221 45
39 39
2 21
3
4
3
51110
1110
10 11
11
2
2
21 11
32
108
810
810
11102
3
2
2
2
2
6
5 14
2
2
10 11
1324
2
6714
6 10 11
161020
16
6
2320
1820
8
214
3 4
67
2
712
9
67
6
822
10
8 6
4
14
13
12
1110
2
8
8
3 4
3 5
16
16
16
16
44
10519
1
15
2 10
174 18
55
4 10
153
820
184 17
105
16
7
88
73
315
1615
5 10
104
153
208
32
23
68
371820
76
1110
Legend
1Traffic Study Area
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS Figure 7-8aOn-Street Parking Regulations
Security ZoneParking Restriction
1 No Parking Anytime 2 No Standing Anytime 3 2 Hour Parking 9am-7pm Mon-Fri4 No Parking 3am - 6am Tues, Thurs, Sat5 No Parking 3am - 6am Mon, Wed, Fri6 No Standing 8am - 6pm Mon-Fri
Except Trucks Unloading & Loading 7 No Parking Midnight - 3am Tues, Thurs, Sat8 No Parking Midnight - 3am Mon, Wed, Fri9 No Standing Anytime Except
Trucks Unloading & Loading 10 1 Hour Parking 9am-7pm Mon-Fri11 No Parking 7:30am - 8am Except Sunday12 No Standing 7am - 10am Mon-Fri13 1 Hour Parking 10am-7pm Mon-Fri14 No Standing 7am - 7pm Mon-Fri15 No Parking 8:30am - 9am Except Sunday16 No Parking 8am - 6pm Mon-Fri17 No Standing 7am - 10am & 4pm - 7pm No
Standing All Other Times Except Trucks Unloading & Loading Mon-Fri
18 1 Hour Parking 10am-4pm Mon-Fri19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
No Parking 8am - 9:30am Tues & FriNo Standing 4pm - 7pm Mon - FriNo Standing 7am - 7pm Mon - Fri Except Trucks Loading & Unloading No Parking 7am - 4pm School Days No Standing 7am - 4pm Mon - Fri Except Trucks Loading & Unloading No Parking 7am - 10am Except SundayNo Standing Anytime Except Authorized VehiclesNo Standing 7am - 10am Except SundayNo Standing 10am - 7pm Except Trucks Unloading & Loading No Parking 8am - 8:30am Except SundayNo Standing 7am - 7pm Except Authorized VehiclesNo Standing Hotel Loading ZoneNo Standing 7am - 7pm No Standing 7am - 7pm Except Trucks Loading & Unlaoding No Standing 7am - 7pm Except Authorized Vehicles
No Standing 7am - 10am & 4pm - 7pm No Standing All Other Times Except Trucks Unloading & Loading Mon-Fri
1 Hour Parking 10am-4pm Mon-Fri 9am - 7pm Sat & SunNo Parking 2am - 6am Mon & ThursNo Standing 7am - 10am & 3pm - 7pm No Standing 10am - 3pm Except Trucks Loading & Unlaoding Mon-Fri
No Standing 8am - 6pm Except Trucks Loading & Unlaoding No Parking 2am - 6am Tues & Fri
1 Hour Parking 8am - 7pm Including Sunday
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
No Parking 8am - 6pm Mon-Fri
No Standing 4pm - 7pm No Standing 7am - 4pm Anytime Except Trucks Loading & Unloading Mon-Fri
No Standing 7am - 3pm Except TrucksLoading & Unlaoding No Standing 3pm - 7pm Mon-Fri
No Parking 7:30am - 8am Except SundayNo Standing 7am - 10am & 4pm - 7pm No Standing 10am - 4pm Except Truck Loading & UnloadingNo Standing 7am - 11am & 2pm No Standing 7am - 11am & 2pm -7pm Except Truck Loading & Unloading Mon-FriNo Standing 1pm - 7pm No Standing All Other TimesNo Parking 8am - 8:30am Mon-Fri2 Hour Parking 8:30am - 7pm Mon-FriNo Parking 11am - 12:30pm Tues & FriNo Parking 11am - 12:30pm Mon & ThursNo Stopping AnytimeNo Standing 4pm - 7pm Except Sunday & No Standing 7am - 4pm Except Truck Loading & Unloading except SundayNo Parking 7am - 4pm Except Sunday No Standing 4pm - 7pm Except SundayNo Parking 7am - 7pm Except SundayNo Parking 11am - 12:30pm Mon & Thurs
No Parking 11am - 12:30pm Tues & Fri
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS Figure 7-8b
On-Street Parking Regulations
BROOKLYN BRIDGE
MADISON ST.
DIVISION ST.
E. BROADWAY
MARKET ST.
PIKE ST. HENRY ST.
CATHERINE ST
OLIVER ST.
MONROE ST.
WATER ST
.
MARKET SLIP
CATHERINE SLIP
CHERRY ST.
SOUTH ST.
HESTER ST.
FORS
YTH
ST.
ELDR
IDG
E ST
.
ESSE
X ST
LUDL
OW S
T.
ORC
HARD
ST.
ALLE
N ST
.
CANAL ST.
FORSYTH ST.
BOW
ERY
HESTER ST.
CHRY
STIE
ST.
GRAND ST.
ELIZ
ABET
H ST
.
MO
TT S
T.
DOYER ST
PELL ST.
MUL
BERR
Y ST
.
BAYARD ST.
CHAT
HAM S
QPAR
K ROW
PEARL ST.
PEAR
L ST
.
CATHERINE ST.
R F WAGNER PL
MOSCO ST
THOMAS PAINE ST.
BAXT
ER S
T
JAMES ST
ST.J
AMES
PL.
ALLEN ST
ALLE
N ST
TRYON ROW
ROSE
ST
EAST
RIV
ER
BROOKLYN BRIDGE
CHUR
CH S
T CLIFF
ST
FRANKFORT ST
FRANKFORT ST
PACE
PZ
GO
LD S
T
SPRUCE ST
PARK R
OW
WIL
LIAM
ST
BEEKMAN ST
NASS
AU S
T
THEA
TRE
AL
ANN ST
FULTON ST
WAT
ER S
T
ROBERT F WAGNER SR PL
PECK SLIPPECK SLIP
DOVER ST
DEY ST
FULTON ST
VESEY ST
BARCLAY ST
FRON
T STW
ATER
ST
BEEKMAN ST
PEAR
L ST
RYDE
RS A
L
PLATT ST
DUTC
H ST
FULTON ST
JOHN ST
LIBE
RTY
PL
MAIDEN LACORTLANDT ST
SOUT
H ST
TRIM
BLE
PL
THOMAS ST
FOLE
Y SQ
BAXT
ER S
T
CENT
RE S
T
WORTH ST
LAFA
YETT
E ST
POLIC
E PZ
YORK ST
BEACH STBEACH ST
VARI
CK S
T
BAXTER ST
HOGAN PL
PEARL ST
W B
ROAD
WAY
AVE OF THE AMERICAS
CANAL ST
LISPENARD ST
WALKER ST
BRO
ADW
AY
WHITE ST
CHUR
CH S
T
FRAN
KLIN
PL
CORT
LAND
T AL
LEONARD ST
FRANKLIN ST
BENS
ON
PL
CATHERINE LA
LAFA
YETT
E ST
HUDS
ON S
T
CHAMBERS ST
READE ST
DUANE ST
AVENUE OF THE FINEST
PARK R
OW
CARD
INAL H
AYES P
L
MADISON ST
CENT
RE S
T
ELK
ST
REPUBLICAN AL
MAN
HATT
AN A
L
W B
ROAD
WAY
CHUR
CH S
T
BRO
ADW
AY
PARK PL
MURRAY ST
WARREN ST
PEDE
STRI
AN S
T
W B
ROAD
WAY
BROOME ST
GRAND ST
CLEV
ELAN
D PL
BROOME ST
WO
OST
ER S
T
GRE
ENE
STGRAND ST CE
NTRE
MAR
KET
PL
CRO
SBY
ST
MER
CER
ST
LAFA
YETT
E ST
BRO
ADW
AY
BROOME ST
HOWARD ST
GRAND ST
CENT
RE S
T
BAXT
ER S
T
CANAL ST
CANAL ST
MUL
BERR
Y ST
MO
TT S
T
ELIZ
ABET
H ST
HESTER ST
BOW
ERY
I
IV
III
II
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS
LegendOn-Street Parking Zone BoundaryZone NumberIV
Figure 7-9On-Street Parking Zones
Security Zone
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS Chapter 7: Traffic and Parking
7-17
during this period was found to be essentially at capacity (approximately 96 percent), with anaverage of approximately 15 spaces available in the overall study area.
Table 7-9: Legal On-Street Parking Capacity and Utilization
Public Authorized Vehicles
Capacity Utilization AvailableSpaces
Capacity Utilization AvailableSpaces
Zone 1 117 96% 5 447 96% 19
Zone 2 0 n/a n/a 280 96% 11
Zone 3 20 100% 0 75 81% 14
Zone 4 289 97% 10 144 97% 4
Total -StudyArea
426 96% 15 946 95% 48
The study area contains a number of government facilities and much of the on-street parking inthe area is designated for government officials and employees. The field surveys indicated thatthere are approximately 946 on-street parking spaces available for official vehicles only in thetotal study area. As shown in Table 7-9, during the weekday midday period, utilization of thesecurbside parking spaces was found to be approximately 95 percent, with an average ofapproximately 48 spaces available for official vehicles only. It should be noted that the numberof available spaces fluctuates somewhat by time of day and day of week, depending on theprevailing parking regulations. The capacities quoted here are typical for the time periodsexamined.
As seen in Table 7-9, Zone I contained approximately 117 spaces for the general public and 447spaces reserved for authorized government vehicles. In Zone II, there were no parking spacesdesignated for the general public and approximately 280 spaces for authorized vehicles. In termsof legal parking spaces for Zone III, 20 spaces were available to the public while 75 werereserved for authorized vehicles. In Zone IV there were approximately 289 spaces for the generalpublic and 144 for authorized vehicles.
Field observations also indicate that illegal curbside parking is prevalent within the study area.The illegal parking by passenger cars generally involved fire hydrant spaces, parking in truckloading zones and bus stops, and in areas designated as no standing or no parking. Many of thesevehicles are the private vehicles of government employees with a placard displayed in the
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS Chapter 7: Traffic and Parking
7-18
windshield of the cars. Illegal parking among the four zones can be seen in Table 7-10. Duringthe field survey, it was observed that approximately 1,012 vehicles with City placards and 205non-City employee vehicles were parked illegally during the typical weekday midday periodwithin the study area. These are in addition to those listed in Table 7-10.
In Zone I, there were 568 illegally parked vehicles with 454 of them belonging to city employees.Zone II contained approximately 202 vehicles parked illegally, of which 156 were officialvehicles. The zone south of the security area, Zone III, was observed to have approximately 239vehicles illegally parked with 213 belonging to city employees. With regards to Zone IV,approximately 208 vehicles were parked illegally. Of these vehicles, 189 belonged to cityemployees and displayed placards.
Table 7-10:Illegal On-Street ParkingZone I II III IV Total
Total of Illegally Parked Vehicles
568 202 239 208 1,217
Number of Illegally ParkedVehicles Displaying City Placards 454 156 213 189
1,012
In addition to the authorized vehicles parking in the four zones, there are a substantial numberof such vehicles (primarily NYPD employee vehicles) parking in the security zone area. Thereis parking along the streets, ramps, and other areas (except along Park Row) within the securityzone since the streets were closed to unauthorized vehicles.
As demonstrated in Tables 7-9 and 7-10, there are about 616 private vehicles and 1,910authorized vehicles (or City-employee owned) parked curbside (both legally and illegally) withinthe quarter mile study area boundary. In addition, approximately 135 vehicles park on the streetwithin the security zone. While the implementation of the security plan resulted in the loss ofon-street parking spaces within the security zone, which were formerly available to the public,this loss is substantially less than the number of on-street spaces created for authorized vehiclesonly along closed streets and ramps. Under No-Action conditions, most of these authorizedvehicles would be displaced outside of the security zone, further exacerbating the private/publicimbalance in curbside parking capacity. Consequently, while there is substantial competition forcurbside space outside of the security zone, the action has not been the cause of this conditionand, therefore, there would be no significant on-street parking impacts.
One Police Plaza Security Plan EIS Chapter 7: Traffic and Parking
7-19
E. CONCLUSION
This chapter analyzes the effects of the diverted traffic that has resulted from the implementationof the security plan on the Lower Manhattan street network during the weekday AM, midday, andPM peak hours. The results of the analyses show that diverted traffic has created significanttraffic impacts (see Table 7-7). Chapter 11, “Mitigation,” of this EIS provides a description ofmeasures to be developed to mitigate the traffic impacts identified in this chapter.
While parking conditions, both off-street and on-street remain very competitive and theavailability of curbside parking for shoppers and others is very limited, these conditions did notresult from the With-Action condition. In addition, as the security plan neither creates demandfor public parking nor eliminates any off-street public parking supply. Consequently, nosignificant adverse impacts on parking have occurred as a result of the implementation of thesecurity plan.