on the stability of morphological parameters measurements with

1
On the stability of morphological parameters measurements with redshift Leonardo Ferreira 1 , Fabricio Ferrari 1 , Claudia Mendes de Oliveira 2 1- Instituto de Matem´ atica Estat´ ıstica e F´ ısica - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, RS, Brazil, 2- Instituto de Astronomia, Geof´ ısica e Ciˆ encias Atmosf´ ericas, Universidade de S˜ ao Paulo, S˜ ao Paulo, SP, Brazil Introduction To understand how galaxies were formed and evolved, we need to measure their properties at different redshifts. Traditional morphological and structural parameters (e.g. S´ ersic intensity, effective radius and index, concentration, asymmetry, Petrosian Radius, Gini coefficient) may be dependent on the image sampling, PSF and SNR. So in order to measure how the morphology of these objects evolve with time, we need to know how robust our measurements are at different redshifts. In this way, we used the FERENGI application to simulate the effect of observing the same galaxy at different redshifts. We applied the procedure to the FREI database to artificially redshift local galaxies up to 1.5 Gpc (z 0.4) and then used the FOTOMETRIKA package to measure several morphological and structural parameters. In this way we were able to check how the measurements behave as the spatial resolution and the SNR decreases. Those parameters that depend on the distance can be corrected for and compared with other measurements, given that we have a Cosmology model. Other parameters, such as asymmetry (both traditional and an improved version), are found to be present stable measurements with redshift. Cosmological model In order to understand how the redshift affects the measurements, we need a cosmological model that describe the universe expansion. In our case, the FRWL metric and the Friedmann’s equation are the mathematical description necessary. Thus, the distance in the line of sight in this case is D = D H Z z 0 dz 0 M (1 + z ) 3 k (1 + z ) 2 Λ ) 1 2 where Ω M k and Ω Λ are the energy density parameters, which is dependent from the cosmological model and D H is the Hubble distance defined as D H = c H 0 for a flat Λ - CDM universe, Ω k 0. In FERENGI, the numerical values for Ω M and Ω Λ are 0.3 and 0.7 respectively. H 0 is parameterized as follows H 0 = h (100 km s -1 Mpc -1 ) , h = 0.7 MORFOMETRYKA measurements MORFOMETRYKA (Ferrari 2014) was used to measure the structural and morphological parameters from the galaxies. It takes each galaxy image, subtracts sky background, locates the object, measures the center, axes lengths and position angle; performs aperture photometry and fits a S´ ersic law to the light profile (S´ ersic 1968); measures Petrosian radius (Petrosian 1976), concentration, asymmetry, smoothness and Gini coefficient (Abraham 1994), (Conselice 2000) & (Lotz 2004). MORFOMETRYKA also presents a new asymmetry index (A 3 ) based on Spearman correlation coefficient. FERENGI FERENGI simulates the redshifting of an object to a given distance. It applies the correct cosmological corrections for size, surface brightness and bandpass shifting. Barden et al. 2008 calls this process ”artificial redshifiting”. In our case, we wrapped FERENGI’s code to produce images of the selected nearby galaxy into several redshifts in a given interval of 50 Mpc, from 0.1 Gpc to 1.5 Gpc. Figure: Diagram of the artificial redshifiting of NGC 4030 galaxy Acknowledgements Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG Instituto Nacional de Ciˆ encia e Tecnologia de Astrof´ ısica - INCT-A References - F. Ferrari et al. MORFOMETRYKA: Galaxy Morphometry., 2014, in prep. www.ferrari.pro.br - Z. Frei, P. Guhathakurta James E. Gunn. 1996: A Catalog of Digital Images of 113 Nerby Galaxies. - Barden. M, Jahnke. K, H¨ außler. B, 2008: FERENGI: Redshifting Galaxies from SDSS to GEMS, STAGES, and COSMOS, ApJS 175, 105B. FREI database FREI galaxy database is a well known collection of images from nearby galaxies collected through the Palomar and the Lowell observatories. In the case of our study, all the images used are taken with two filters, J (450 nm) and R (650 nm). These images are good to work with because they are well documented, including the PSF information necessary. Figure: Example of FREI galaxies used in this study. Figure: Color codes Measurements with redshift Conclusions I Concentration, Asymmetry, Gini and S´ ersic parameters can be measured reliably by MORFOMETRYKA. I A 3 asymmetry index (this work) discriminates better than traditional index A 1 . I C 2 (outer) concentration discriminates better than C 1 (inner). I Image sampling is crucial for morphometry measurements. General advice is pixel size < R n 10 I Measurements converge to the PSF values with increasing redshift. Reliable measurements are limited to distances where R n > 2 PSF FWHM References (cont.) - ersic, J.-L. 1968, Atlas de Galaxias Australes - Petrosian, V. ApJ 1976 209L 1P - Abraham, R G.; Valdes, F.; Yee, H. K. C.; van den Bergh, S., ApJ 1994 432 75 - Conselice, C. J.; Bershady, M. A.; Jangren, A. ApJ 2000 529 886C - Lotz, J. M.; Primack, J.; Madau, P., AJ, 2004 128 163L http://www.ferrari.pro.br/ [email protected], [email protected]

Upload: lekhanh

Post on 06-Jan-2017

223 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: On the stability of morphological parameters measurements with

On the stability of morphological parameters measurements with redshift

Leonardo Ferreira1, Fabricio Ferrari1, Claudia Mendes de Oliveira2

1- Instituto de Matematica Estatıstica e Fısica - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, RS, Brazil,2- Instituto de Astronomia, Geofısica e Ciencias Atmosfericas, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

Introduction

To understand how galaxies were formed and evolved, we need to measure theirproperties at different redshifts. Traditional morphological and structural parameters(e.g. Sersic intensity, effective radius and index, concentration, asymmetry, PetrosianRadius, Gini coefficient) may be dependent on the image sampling, PSF and SNR. So inorder to measure how the morphology of these objects evolve with time, we need toknow how robust our measurements are at different redshifts. In this way, we used theFERENGI application to simulate the effect of observing the same galaxy at differentredshifts. We applied the procedure to the FREI database to artificially redshift localgalaxies up to 1.5 Gpc (z ≈ 0.4) and then used the FOTOMETRIKA package tomeasure several morphological and structural parameters. In this way we were able tocheck how the measurements behave as the spatial resolution and the SNR decreases.Those parameters that depend on the distance can be corrected for and compared withother measurements, given that we have a Cosmology model. Other parameters, such asasymmetry (both traditional and an improved version), are found to be present stablemeasurements with redshift.

Cosmological model

In order to understand how the redshift affects the measurements, we need acosmological model that describe the universe expansion. In our case, the FRWL metricand the Friedmann’s equation are the mathematical description necessary. Thus, thedistance in the line of sight in this case is

D = DH

∫ z

0

dz′

(ΩM(1 + z)3 + Ωk(1 + z)2 + ΩΛ)12

where ΩM, Ωk and ΩΛ are the energy density parameters, which is dependent from thecosmological model and DH is the Hubble distance defined as

DH =c

H0

for a flat Λ− CDM universe, Ωk ≈ 0. In FERENGI, the numerical values for ΩM and ΩΛ

are 0.3 and 0.7 respectively. H0 is parameterized as follows

H0 = h (100 km s−1 Mpc−1) , h = 0.7

MORFOMETRYKA measurements

MORFOMETRYKA (Ferrari 2014) was used to measure the structural and morphologicalparameters from the galaxies. It takes each galaxy image, subtracts sky background,locates the object, measures the center, axes lengths and position angle; performsaperture photometry and fits a Sersic law to the light profile (Sersic 1968); measuresPetrosian radius (Petrosian 1976), concentration, asymmetry, smoothness and Ginicoefficient (Abraham 1994), (Conselice 2000) & (Lotz 2004). MORFOMETRYKA alsopresents a new asymmetry index (A3) based on Spearman correlation coefficient.

FERENGI

FERENGI simulates the redshifting of an object to a given distance. It applies the correctcosmological corrections for size, surface brightness and bandpass shifting. Barden et al.2008 calls this process ”artificial redshifiting”. In our case, we wrapped FERENGI’s codeto produce images of the selected nearby galaxy into several redshifts in a given intervalof 50 Mpc, from 0.1 Gpc to 1.5 Gpc.

Figure: Diagram of the artificial redshifiting of NGC 4030 galaxy

Acknowledgements

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURGInstituto Nacional de Ciencia e Tecnologia de Astrofısica - INCT-A

References

− F. Ferrari et al. MORFOMETRYKA: Galaxy Morphometry., 2014, in prep. www.ferrari.pro.br

− Z. Frei, P. Guhathakurta James E. Gunn. 1996: A Catalog of Digital Images of 113 Nerby Galaxies.

− Barden. M, Jahnke. K, Haußler. B, 2008: FERENGI: Redshifting Galaxies from SDSS to GEMS,

STAGES, and COSMOS, ApJS 175, 105B.

FREI database

FREI galaxy database is a well known collection of images from nearby galaxies collectedthrough the Palomar and the Lowell observatories. In the case of our study, all the imagesused are taken with two filters, J (450 nm) and R (650 nm). These images are good towork with because they are well documented, including the PSF information necessary.

Figure: Example of FREI galaxies used in this study.

Figure: Color codes

Measurements with redshift

Conclusions

I Concentration, Asymmetry, Gini and Sersic parameters can be measured reliably byMORFOMETRYKA.

I A3 asymmetry index (this work) discriminates better than traditional index A1.I C2 (outer) concentration discriminates better than C1 (inner).I Image sampling is crucial for morphometry measurements. General advice is

pixel size <Rn

10I Measurements converge to the PSF values with increasing redshift. Reliable

measurements are limited to distances where

Rn > 2 PSFFWHM

References (cont.)

− Sersic, J.-L. 1968, Atlas de Galaxias Australes

− Petrosian, V. ApJ 1976 209L 1P

− Abraham, R G.; Valdes, F.; Yee, H. K. C.; van den Bergh, S., ApJ 1994 432 75

− Conselice, C. J.; Bershady, M. A.; Jangren, A. ApJ 2000 529 886C

− Lotz, J. M.; Primack, J.; Madau, P., AJ, 2004 128 163L

http://www.ferrari.pro.br/ [email protected], [email protected]