on the hochschild cohomology of truncated cycle algebras
TRANSCRIPT
This article was downloaded by: [University of Nebraska, Lincoln]On: 14 November 2014, At: 11:30Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: MortimerHouse, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Communications in AlgebraPublication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lagb20
On the hochschild cohomology of truncated cyclealgebrasM.J. Bardzell a , Ana Claudia Locateli b & Eduardo N. Marcos ba Salisbury State University , Mariland, USA E-mail:b IME-USP , Caixa Postal 66281 (Ag. Cidade de São Paulo), São Paulo, SP, CEP 05315-970,BrazilPublished online: 27 Jun 2007.
To cite this article: M.J. Bardzell , Ana Claudia Locateli & Eduardo N. Marcos (2000) On the hochschild cohomology oftruncated cycle algebras, Communications in Algebra, 28:3, 1615-1639, DOI: 10.1080/00927870008826917
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00927870008826917
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) containedin the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make norepresentations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose ofthe Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors,and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be reliedupon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not beliable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilitieswhatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising outof the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematicreproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in anyform to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
COMMUNICATIONS IN ALGEBRA, 28(3), 1615-1639 (2000)
ON THE HOCHSCHILD COHOMOLOGY OF TRUNCATED CYCLE
ALGEBRAS
hl. 3 . Bardzell
Salisbury State University, Alariland, USA,
email: [email protected]
Ana Claudia Locateli and Eduardo N. Marcos
IhIE-USP,
Caixa Postal 66281 (Ag. Cidade de S&o P a d o ) , CEP 05315-970 - SBo Paulo, SP,
Brazil
emails: [email protected], [email protected],
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this paper is to study the tlochschild col~omology ring I I e ( A )
of algebras of the form 11 = ~ z , / J " , where Z, is an oriented cycle with e vertices and J is the
ideal generated by the arrows, N 2 2. IVe provide a new description of the Yoneda product in
H O ( . l ) and prove that this is a finitely generated infinite dimensional ring. In addition we show
that algebras of the form A = k Z , / J N are not derived equivalent unless they are isomorphic.
Let k be a field and let ii be a finite dimensional k algebra. The nth Hochscliild
cohomology group of A is Hn(A) = E ~ t ; ~ ( i i , A). Here A' = h o p 81, A since we will
be considering right he - modules. The Hochschild cohomology ring is then defined
1615
Copyright Q 2888 by Marcei Dekker, inc.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
ebra
ska,
Lin
coln
] at
11:
30 1
4 N
ovem
ber
2014
1616 BARDZELL, LOCATELI, AND MARCOS
to be H0(.i) = LI Hn(A) where multiplication is given by the Yoneda product (see n>O
[hl]). For most finite dimensional algebras little is known about the cohomology
groups and even less is known about the cohomology ring. The interested reader
should refer to [Ha] for an overview of Hochschild cohomology. In this paper we
study a class of algebras where we can compute all of the cohomology groups and
describe the cohomology ring using generators and relations. These algebras are
truncated quotients of path algebras where the underlying graph is a single oriented
cycle. Under these hypotheses, the Hochschild coho~nology ring is finitely generated
regardless of the field characteristic. These algebras, which are also studied in
[EH] using a different approach, are basic self-i~ijective Nakayanla algchras. Our
methods involve a new description of the Yoneda product based on the rnilii~nal :Ie-
resolution of the algebra A. We also provide examples of non-truncated algebras,
i.e. Nakayama but not self-injective, where the cohomology rings are not finitely
generated.
Let 2, denote the quiver with e vertices { v l , ..., u,) and e arrows { a l , ... a,) such
that the origin vertex o(a,) of the arrow ai equals the terminus vertex t (a i - l ) of a ,
(mod e).
Throughout this paper yi will denote a path of length J beginning at the vertex
ul. If the quiver is 2, then this path is unique. If A and B are sets of paths, then
( A / / B ) = { ( p , q) E -4 x B : o ( p ) = o(q) and t ( p ) = t ( q ) ) . If A is the set of all paths
of length j then we write ( A N B ) = ( j / / B ) . If p and q are paths, then the notation
(p, q) means that o(p) = o(q) and t ( p ) = t ( q ) . Throughout this paper J will always
denote the two-sided ideal generated by the arrows. Finally, if A is a set of linearly
independent vectors, then LA will denote the subspace spanned by A.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
ebra
ska,
Lin
coln
] at
11:
30 1
4 N
ovem
ber
2014
HOCHSCHILD COHOMOLOGY 1617
In section 2 we discuss the cohomology groups for A = k Z e / J N . To do this
we introduce a group action on the terms P,' of a coboundary complex. This
complex is the dual complex of the minimal resolution of the algebra '1 over its
enveloping algebra l i e , i.e. it is the complex obtained by applying the functor
Hcnr~,~. (, .i). Here the group is the cyclic group of order e. In section 3 a new
product on P,' = LI P,' is described. This turns out to be a well-defined product n>O
on H 9 ( A ) . The fourth section explains why this product coi~icides with the Yoneda
product. In section 5 we provide the ring structure for H * ( ~ z , / J " ) . This includes
the cohomology ring of Brauer Tree Algebras as a special case. We show that
~ ' ( k Z , l J") is always finitely generated and provide a presentation of generators
and relations. In section 6 we apply our results to show that algebras of the form
k Z , / J N are not derived equivalent unless they are isomorphic. 111 the last section
we consider two examples of the form k Z , / I where I # J N . In other words, we
study two basic Nakayama algebras that are not self-injective. In both examples the
cohomology ring is infinite dimensional but the Yoneda product is zero in non-zero
degree. Hence the cohomology rings are not finitely generated.
Let A be a finite dimensional mononlial algebra. Then Hz(A) is the i t h colio-
mology group of the coboundary complex
where P; = LI , o ( p ) h t ( p ) . Here A P ( 0 ) = ( v l , ..., v,) , ilP(1) = { a l , ..., a , ) , and PE*P(I )
A P ( 2 ) is the minimal set of all paths that generate I. The AP( j ) sets for j > 2 are
sets of "longer paths" constructed inductively using the A P ( 2 ) paths. For a more
detailed description of these paths see [B] and [GHZ]. The 4; maps are described
in [Bh,I].
Now let us focus on the special case where A = ~ z , / J ~ where N > 2. In this
section we compute the kernels and images of these boundary maps t o provide a
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
ebra
ska,
Lin
coln
] at
11:
30 1
4 N
ovem
ber
2014
1618 BARDZELL, LOCATELI, AND MARCOS
k-basis for the cohomology groups. For each 1 > 0 write P: = ,LI k( j // i lP(1)) (see J > O
[LO] ). Next let Ce =< g : ge = 1 > be the cyclic group of order e generated by g.
Then each nonzero k( j / / . IP( l ) ) can naturally be considered as a free kce-module
of rank 1 and the maps 4; are Ce- module maps. The Ce action is defined as
follows. Given ( y , p ) E k ( j / / A P ( l ) ) , define g . ( y , p ) to he the ordered pair (y ' ,p ') ,
where y' and p' are the clockwise rotates of y and p by one arrow. In other words,
if p = aiai+l ... am (mod e ) , then p' = ai+l...a,,+l (mod e). Note that each ( y , p )
generates the module P;. N-1
Given i 2 0 we know by [Lo] that &+, : P;i + PC,,, where P& = j I l o k ( j / / N i )
N - 1 and PTi+, = ,LI k ( j / / N i + l ) , can be written in the form $;i+l = (Do, D l , ..., D N - I ) .
j=o For each j, with 0 5 j 5 iV - 2, Di : k ( j / / N i ) t k ( j + l / / N i + 1) is defined
by D, ( y , p) = ( a y , ap) - ( y p , pp) where a: and p are the unique arrows such that
t ( a ) = o(y ) = o(p) and o(p ) = t ( 7 ) = t (p) . hloreover DN-1 = 0. If we choose
yFi) and ( y i f ' , yFi+') to be generators of k ( j / / N i ) and k ( j + 1/ /Ni + I ) ,
respectively, as Ce-modules, then we can describe the map D j as the Ce- module
map given by Dj(-(6, # I ) = ( g - I - l)(?i+', yFi+l). This means that I m D j is the
augmentation ideal. That is, Im Dj 2 A(kCe) , which has co-dimension 1. It fol- e
lows that ker D j is one-dimensional and we can take { C (7; , yr')) as a k-basis for 1=1
ker D, .
Now, write N = me + t , 0 5 t < e. Let us desclibe the map $;, for i > 6. By N - 1 N - 1
[Lo] we know that we can write $I, : LI k ( j / / N ( i - 1) + 1) t LI k ( j / / N i ) as J=O ]=I
where Do : k(O//N(i - 1) + 1 ) ---+ k ( N - l / / N i ) is given by
is clearly a kce-map and we can write D ~ ( Z J O , y:(l-l ' fl ) = 7 1 1 ~ ( $ - 1 , f 2 ) + 1=1
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
ebra
ska,
Lin
coln
] at
11:
30 1
4 N
ovem
ber
2014
HOCHSCHILD COHOMOLOGY 1619
t (Yjhj-l,Yfia). We should point out here that gcd(N, e) = 1. Otherwise
1=1
(0//N(i - 1) + 1) = 0 and Do = 0.
Next let us compute the kernel and image of Do. Let el = m ($-l, Ty2)) + 2 ($-1,7r i) . Then cl and gcl are both in Im Do and 1=1
Since gcd(N,e) = 1,we also have gcd(t,e) = 1. This means gt generates C, and,
consequently, l-gt generates A(kCe). Once we have that k(N-l//Nz) is isomorphic
to kc , , we can conclude that Im Do contains a copy of A(kCe).
Let E be the augmentation homomorphism. Then &(el) = N and, if char k { N ,
then Im Do properly contains A(kCe). In this case A(kCe) must be k(N - l / /Ni) .
(Remember that A(kC,) has co-dimension 1). If char k N then In1 Do = A(kCe)
since cl E A(kCe). So if char k { N then Do is injective. If char k I N and
N i = N - 1 (mod e), then ker Do is one dimensional.
Let us now summarize the formulas we obtain from the discussion above and
[Lo]. Let N = me + t where 0 5 t 5 e - 1. Then
m + e if t = l m i f t = 0 , 1
if t = 0 and dim H 1 (11) = m + 1 otherwise
m + 1 otherwise
Given i 2 1, let Ci(N) = # { j ( 0 5 j < N - 2, j 5 t i (mod e)]. If char
k { N or N i $ N - 1 (mod e), then dim H2%(A) = dim H2'+'(.\) = Ci(N). If char
k I N and N i = N - 1 (mod e) , then dim H"(A) = dim H2i-1(A) = Ci(N) + 1. In
the last section we will provide alternate fornlulas for these dimensions. Formulas
for the characteristic zero case have also been provided recently by Pu Zhang in
[ZI.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
ebra
ska,
Lin
coln
] at
11:
30 1
4 N
ovem
ber
2014
1620 BARDZELL, LOCATELI, AND MARCOS
In this section we assume A: > 2.
Consider P: = LI P: = LI k ( r / / ; IP( i ) ) . We define a multiplication on P: as 120 120
follows. If ( y , p ) E ( r / / A P ( i ) ) and ( a , q) E (r/ / .JP(l)) with i , 1 2 0, let
( 7 , ~ ) v ( ~ 1 4 = otherwise
Now that the product is defined on the basis elements, we extend V linearly to a
product on P:. Since the AP(i) sets form a multiplicative basis of the Ext-algebra
E(A) when A is a monomial algebra ( see [GZ ] ), it is easy to see that this product e
is associative. It is also clear that C (e,, e,) is the unity element for this product. 2=1
So we now have a ring structure on P:. We should point out here that this is a
product for any monomial algebra ( see [Lo21 ).
Now we need to show that this product is well-defined on Ha(.i) = LI H i ( A ) . l>0
First we prove that K = LI ker4; is a subring of P,'. Then we will show that ? > I
I m = LI Im4: is a two-sided ideal of K. This will provide a ring structure for 221
H*(A). For the rest of this section we will be considering A = k Z , / J N .
L e m m a 3.1. The prdiluct e,f two e ? e ~ e % t s z odd Jey-ee is z e x .
Proof. See [Lo21 1
Proposition 3.2. K = ,LI ker 4; is a subring of P:. 22 1
Proof. Let x = C a l ( y l , p l ) E ker4: and y = Cbs(as ,qs ) E ker#j* for some i,j 2 1. I S
If i and j are even, then x E PCl and y E P C l . So x V y = 0 E k e r 4 L j p l .
Now suppose i is even and j is odd. If char k 1 N, then 7 , E rad('1) for all 1. So
yla, ~ r a d ( A ) for every 1 , s and it follows that x V y E ker4:+,-,. If char k I .N Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
ebra
ska,
Lin
coln
] at
11:
30 1
4 N
ovem
ber
2014
HOCHSCHILD COHOMOLOGY 1621
and (O/jAP(i - 1)) # 0, we can write x = xo + xl where xo E k(O//AP(i - 1)) N-1
and xl E LI k(j//..1P(z - 1)) . Since X I E ker4: we must have xo E kerg: also. ~ = l e
So we can suppose that x E k(O//.-IP(i - 1)) and write x = a x (vt,p,) where a is 1=1
a non-zero element of k . If we write y = yo + yl where yo E k(O//.-IP(1 - 1) ) and N-1
y1 E IJ k(j//AP(l - I ) ) , then we have x V y = x V yo + x V yl. Since x V yl E 1=1 N-1 e
LI k(j//.llP(i + j - 2)) we have x V y1 E ker 4:+,-, . Writing yo = C b(ut, q,), b E k , 3=1 i=l
P
then x V yo = Ca.b(vt ,ptqt) E ker Do. So we have x V y E ker q6:+,-, . The case t=l
where i is odd and 1 is even is analogous.
Finally, we need to consider the case where i and 1 are both odd. In this case N-l N-1
ker q6f = LI ker ~j and ker 4; = LI ker Df, so we can assume that x E ker D l J = O 1=0
and y E ker DL for some u. w with 0 5 u, w < N - 1. Thus we can write x =
a(-,;', yi2-1)), y = f: b($, -,ji-l)) where y i denotes the path starting a t vt and t=l t=l length j for 0 5 j < N - 1 and yl3) denotes the path starting a t vt belonging
to AP(s) . Then x V y = cab(-,:+"', yi2+1-" ) . I f u + w > N , t h e n r V y = O ~ t=l
ker@:+,-,. Otherwise, x V y E ker DL?;~. It follows that I( is a subring of P,*. I
Proposition 3.3. Im = ,LI Imq6: is a two-sided ideal of K. 221
Proof. Let 0 # x = E a t (7, ,pt) t im 4; P2' and 0 f y = Zb, (a,, q,) E ker 4; t S
PL, for some i , l 2 1. We will show that x V y and y V x are both in Im. First
suppose that i is odd. We can assume that x E In1 DL for some u, 0 5 u 5 N - 2.
Then the length of y, is greater than or equal to 1 for each t . If 1 is even, we have
X V y = 0 E Im since the product of two elements of odd degree is zero. If 1 is odd we
canassumey E kerDLforsomew,O < w < N - 1 . I f w = N-1, thenxVy = O E In1
since the length of o, is N - 1 for each s and the length of y, is greater than or equal
to 1 for each t . So suppose O 5 w < N - 1. Then we can write y = bC(y,W,
where b g k.We know that there exists z = 5 ~,(-y;,~!-l)) E P;_, such that n=l
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
ebra
ska,
Lin
coln
] at
11:
30 1
4 N
ovem
ber
2014
1622 BARDZELL, LOCATELI, AND MARCOS
Therefore, x V y E Im C_ I m .
Now suppose that i is even. Then x E k ( N - l / / A P ( i ) ) and there is
z E k(O//AP(i - 1 ) ) such that z = $T(z) . ?Ve can assume that z = ( v j , y j ' - l ) ) and
If 1 is even we have y E k (O/ /AP( l -1) ) since x f k ( N - l / / A P ( i ) ) (as in Proposition
1). If char k t N then y = 0 and x V y = 0 E I m . If char k I N then we can write
e
But cn = t ( m + 1) + ( e - t )m = me + t = AT and, since char k I N , we have n=l
2 cn = 0. Now, i + 1 - I is odd so it follows that z V y E Im$:+,-,. Therefore n=l
If 1 is odd, we let y E ker D: for some 0 5 j 5 N - 1. If j > 1, we have x V y = 0 e
since x E k ( N - l / / .aP( i ) ) . So suppose y E ker Dk and write y = C (v , , &') . s=l
Then we have x V y = f: cn(y;- lr Ttti-i') and since n = l
m + l if j < n < j + t - 1 c;. = {
m otherwise
(z+l-2) we know that z V y = $~+,-,(v,, y, ) . S o z v y E I m .
Using a analogous argument one can show that y V x E I m . We conclude that
Im is a two-sided ideal of K. a
We now have a product on H 9 ( A ) . Note that H i ( A ) V H 1 ( ; i ) C_ Hi+' (A) . In the
next section we will show that V is actually the Yoneda product.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
ebra
ska,
Lin
coln
] at
11:
30 1
4 N
ovem
ber
2014
HOCHSCHILD COHOMOLOGY 1623
In this section we will show that the product V just defined coilicictes with the
Yoneda product. Let
be a .Ie-projective resolution and A 1 ~ I b I o d ( , l ~ ) . Apply - $1) = ( - J l )
t o the resolution above t o obtain the complex
ker$, I Then Hn(.I,A1) = ,.,+ . Since P,, = LI Ao(p) 8 t(p)A we can rewrite this p € A P ( n )
complex as follows:
where CL[(mp,P)pEAP(n)] = pmp : LI Ao(p) @ t(p)h --+ A 1 is defined by P E A P ( ~ )
pnr,[(Xpo(p) @ t ( p ) ~ b ) ~ ] = C X ~ ~ ~ X ~ . Using the notation from [Lo] we have P
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
ebra
ska,
Lin
coln
] at
11:
30 1
4 N
ovem
ber
2014
1624 BARDZELL, LOCATELI, AND MARCOS
1 4 1 , + 1 [ ( l n p r ~ ) p E ~ ~ ( r l ) l = (lqnzq2 - m q l q , q ) g E ~ ~ ( r , + ~ ) and
N
@ ; ~ [ ( m p , ~ ) p 6 A ~ ( n ) ] = ( C '-lqmq,qN-Jl Q ) ~ E A P ( ~ + I ) for 2 2 0. 1=1
Now, given n 2 0 and [f] = E HtL( . i , .I) co~isitler the map
of functors [f] V - : H O ( h , -) + Hn(.i, -) where, for each A l Eniod(Ae), the
It is not hard to see that ([f] V is well-defined and [f] V - is a map between
functors. One can also show that the definition of [f] v - does not depend on the
representation of f .
The universal property of derived functors asserts that there is a unique map of
cohomology functors f V - : Hm(A,-) t Hmt"(h, -) extending from the degree
zero component. Likewise, if we denote the Yoneda product on H*(A, -) by * , then [f] * - : Hm(A, -) ---i H m + n ( ~ I , -) is the unique map of cohomology functors
extending the degree zero component.
We want t o prove that in the case M = A, V coincides with the Yoneda product.
By the universal property of derived functors, it suffices to show that for each [f] E
Hrl(A), the maps [f] V - and [f] * - coincide in degree zero. So take f ker C
Horn,,. (P,,, A) and g E ker 4; E Horn*. (Po, A) where f E [f] and g E [g]. The
Yoneda product is given by the following commutative diagram:
@ 0,-1 P,, 4 Pn-1 ---+ . . . $2. PI 3 Po -+ A --+ 0
L f A
where the yi are the liftings of g. Then f * g = f 0 y, ( see [W] ). Define the maps
yi : Pn -+ Pn on the idempotents by yi : o(p) 8 t(p) ++ o(p) 8 g(t(p) 63 t(p)).
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
ebra
ska,
Lin
coln
] at
11:
30 1
4 N
ovem
ber
2014
HOCHSCHILD COHOMOLOGY 1625
5 . THE RING STRUCTURE O F H * ( A )
In this section we will provide the ring structure of He(] ! ) for A = k Z e / J N . First
we find the group generators for H i ( A ) and then we determine the ring structure by
providing generators and relations. For another presentation of these rings see [EH].
By Corollary 3.3 and the fact that tlie Yoneda product is graded co~linlutative, we
know that H*( , i ) is graded commutative. Throughout this section we will provide
k- bases of equivalence classes for cohomology groups. To keep the notation simple,
a representative of each equivalence class will be used to denote the class itself. We
begin with the following result.
P r o p o s i t i o n 5.1. If A = ~ z , / J ~ with N > 2, then H O ( A ) has k-basis B =
(?ae, vr); 0 5 a I [v] i f N $ 1 (mod e ) or B U { ($ ' - l , u l ) , 1 5 1 5 e ) if
N e 1 (mod e ) .
Proof. This is a direct consequence of the fact that H O ( l l ) = ker4; and
( N - 1 / / 1 ) = 0 if N f. 1 (mod e ) . I
P r o p o s i t i o n 5.2. If char k I N and N i z N - 1 (mod e) , then
{ 5 ( 7 : . 7 ~ ' ) : 0 5 j 5 N - 2 , j = N - l [=I ( m o d ~ ) } U { ~ ( ~ ~ - ~ , ~ ~ ~ ) ) i = 1
6s a basis of H 2 ' ( A ) for z 2 1. Otherwise, we have that Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
ebra
ska,
Lin
coln
] at
11:
30 1
4 N
ovem
ber
2014
1626 BARDZELL, LOCATELI, AND MARCOS
j N - 2 , j = N i ( m o d e ) I is a basis of H 2 2 ( ~ Z ) for i 2 1.
Proof. We have already seen that
If char k I N and N i N - 1 (mod e ) , then we have that
Otherwise, if char k ( N , then I m & = k ( N - l / / N i ) . In this way, if char k I N and e
N i r N - 1 (niod e), then it is a straightforward verification that (??- I , 7:') 4 1=1
Im &. Since H 2 ' ( A ) = ker &+, / Im &, the result follows.
Proposition 5.3. If char k I N and N i E N - 1 (mod e ) , then
{ ~ ( 7 ~ i ' , ? r ( ' - l ) + ' ) : 0 < j < N - 2, j + 1 r 0 (mod e ) ) U { e h , ?r('-l)+l 1=1 1=1
is a basis o f H2i-1(! i) for i 2 1. Otherwise we have that
) : 0 5 j 5 N - 2 , j E N ( i - 1 ) (mod e ) 1=1
Proof. We know
N(i-l)+l Im # L 1 = k{(y;+' , yl ) - (?3+1 N(l-l)+l
1 + 1 , ~ 1 + 1 ) : l < l < e - 1 ,
0 I j 5 N - 2, j + 1 = N ( i - 1) (mod e)}
If char k I N and N i I N - 1 (mod e ) , then ker #li = k (5 ( v l , -yy('-')il 1=1
N-1 ( ' l l k ( j / / ~ ( i - 1 + 1) . Otherwise ker& = ,lI k ( j / / N ( i - 1) + 1). It is now
j=1
easy t o verify that , for 1 < j < N - 1, f:(7!, yy('-l'+l ) 4 I m & - l . I 1=1
We are now ready to provide generators and relations for the Hochschild co-
homology algebras. In particular, we show that if A = k Z e / J N , then He( . i ) is
finitely generated.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
ebra
ska,
Lin
coln
] at
11:
30 1
4 N
ovem
ber
2014
HOCHSCHILD COHOMOLOGY 1627
e e Theorem 5.4. Suppose that N 5 e and consider x = C (ul, vl), y = C (al, al),
1=1 1=1
and z, = 2 (-/:, 7r'~ ), where i j is the smallest integer greater than zero such that 1=1
Ni, = j (mod e). Then if char k .1. N or char k I N and gcd(N,e) # 1, then H0(A)
is generated by {x, y, z, : 0 5 j < N - 2) subject to the following relations:
U" 0, z?"] = 0 , and zq = z,, if 1 < u j 5 N - 2 and i a j = ai, for 1 < j 5 N - 2 .
Proof. Since N < e all of the cohomology groups are one-dimensional. So x and
y clearly generate HO(:\) and H1(:i), respectively. For i 2 1, Hz(:\) is ge~imited
by 2 (7: , r r ' ) where iVi j (mod e), 0 < j 5 N - 2. For each such j, let i j be 1=1
the sniallest integer greater than zero such that N i j r j (mod e) . Note that if i is
such that N i - 0 (mod e ) and i > i o , then we have i = Xio + i f with 0 5 i' < io.
So N i = NXio + Nil = 0 (mod e ) and since NioX - 0 (mod e ) we have Nit r 0
(mod e). However, io is the smallest integer satisfying this property. It follows
that i' = 0. Thus, i = X i o and e = Xio. Note also that if i is such that hr i j
(mod e ) 1 5 J 5 N - 2 and i > a , , then we can write i = il + i' where a' 2 1. So
N i = Nil + ~ i ' r j (mod e) and since Ni , = j (mod e ) , we have Ni t r 0 (mod e)
and i t is a multiple of io. That is, i = i j + aio.
Now, if H2'(A) # 0, then N i r j (mod e ) for some 0 5 j 5 N - 2. Since H Z i ( h ) e
' Ni ,+Nnio is generated by C ($, yp') = C ($, yl ) = z: V zj and HZi+'(A) # 0 is
1=1 1=1 P
generated by ($+I, yyZ+') = z: V z , V y , we have that {z, y, 2, : 0 5 j 5 N - 2 ) 1=1
generates as a k-algebra.
We know that the product of elements of odd degree is always zero. In particular,
y2 = 0. Since paths of length at least N are zero, we also have z[1"'" = 0. It is easy
t o see that if 0 5 j 5 N - 2, and if a is such that 1 < a j 5 N - 2 with iag = uij,
then we must have ZP = z,j.
Corollary 5.5. If N = e and char k j N , then Ho(A) is isomorphic to the poly-
nomial ring v. Proof. If N = e then io = 1 and Ni r 0 (mod e ) for all i > 1.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
ebra
ska,
Lin
coln
] at
11:
30 1
4 N
ovem
ber
2014
1628 BARDZELL, LOCATELI, AND MARCOS
Theorem 5.6. Suppose that N < e , char k I N , and gcd(N,e) = 1 and let I be
the smallest integer such that N ( I - 1) + 1 = 0 (mod e). Consider x, y, and zj e
N(I-1)f 1 for 0 < j 5 N - 2 as in Theorem 5.4. Consider also w = C (ul,yl 1x1
E
If2'-' (.I), and u = 5 ( 7 , ~ - ' , 7 ~ ' ) t HZ'(A). Then Ho(A) is generated by the set 1=1
{ x , y, z,, w , u : 0 < j 5 N - 2) . These generators satisfy the relations described in
Theorem 5.4 and u2 = 0 , u V y = u V z, = 0, 1 5 j 5 N - 2.
Proof. Suppose char k I N . 4 s we have seen in Theorem 5.4, x, y, and zJ, 0 5 j 5
N - 2 , generate the cohomology groups HZi(h) and HZi-l (A) for all i 2 0 such that,
Ni j (mod e). If gcd(N, e ) # 1, there is no integer i such that N i N - 1 (mod
e ) and so Ho(;i) is generated by these elements. If gcd(N, e ) = 1 then there exists
integers i such that N i r N - 1 (mod e) . Since char k I N we have that , for those i,
H2'(A) and HZ'-'(A) are nonzero. By Propositions 5.2 and 5.3, Hz'-'(A) is gener- e N(i-l)+l e
ated by C (vi,-Yl ) and H2i(.A) is generated by 2 (??-I, $ l ) . Let I be the 1=1 1=1
e N(I-l)+l smallest integer such that N I = N - 1 (mod e) . Consider ru = C (ul, y1 1=1
) E
Hz'-'(A) and u = k ( 7 ~ - 1 , ? y ' ) 6 H 2 ' ( I ) . AS we did in the proof of Theorem 1=1
5.1, we note that if Ni - N-1 (mod e ) then i = I+aio for some integer a 2 0. Then
addition; H2'(A) is generated by 2 (7y-1; #') = (-$-I ! ?:'+N~'~) = U V T ~ It 1=1 1=1
follows that {z, y, z J : w , u : 0 5 j < N - 2) generates He(,\) as an algebra. hlore-
over, since every path of length greater than or equal to N is zero, it is easy to see
that these elements must satisfy the relations u2 = 0 and u V y = u V zj = 0 for
1 5 j < N - 2 . 1
Theorem 5.7. Suppose N > e and N f 1 (mod e) . If char k t N or if char k I N
and gcd(N, e ) # 1, then Hg(A) is generated by {xo, x l , y , zr : 0 5 r 5 e - 1) where
each 0 5 r < e - 1, ZT = c(?:, 7Yir) with ir the smallest integer greater than 1=1
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
ebra
ska,
Lin
coln
] at
11:
30 1
4 N
ovem
ber
2014
HOCHSCHILD COHOMOLOGY 1629
zero such that A'z, T (mod e). Moreover, these generators satzsfy 4" = 0 zf
N - 0 (mod e); x;'" = 0 zf N f 0 (mod e); y2 = 0, zINIr1 = 0, and z: = zbr zf
1 < br < e - 1 and ibr = bi,.
Proof. By Proposition 5.1, HO(A) has k-basis C ( y a e , v l ) : 0 5 a < [y] .Then L1 1 we have that xo and x l generate HO(l l ) . For each i 2 1, H2"A) has k -basis
x (y{ ,Y;v l ) : 0 5 j 5 N - 2, j N i (mod e) . For each r, with 0 5 r < e - 1, {/Il 1 let z, be the smallest integer greater than zero such that Ni , = r (mod e). For each
such r consider z. = 2 ( 5 ; , r p i F ) t H2lv(.l). So if N i - r (mod e ) , i > 0, then 1=1
e e ,Ni,+Na,ro we have i = i, + a,io for some a, > 0. Then x ($,?Yi) = C (yr, , ( ) = 1=1 1=1
z, V 2:". If 0 5 j 5 N - 2 and j r r (mod e) then j = r + b,e for some e .
bj > 0. SO E (r:,rri) = 5 (7:+b1e, y ~ i v + " a F i O ) = z, v 2:' v x:'. ~t follows that 1=1 1=1
XI and z,, 0 < r 5 e - 1, generate H2'(A) for i 2 1. For each i 2 1, HZi-'(A)
e sider y = C (cul,cur) E H 1 (,I). Note that if 0 5 j 5 N - 2 and j 0 (mod e) ,
1=1 then j = bje = b;io for some b; 2 0 (remember that e = Xio). So wc can write
e ' b,1o+l ( I ) = ( 7 , U I ) = y V xi'. We conclude that y and xi generate 1=1 1=1 H 1 (A).
Then 5 ($+I, -yl\'('-')+l ) = (?;.+I, $'tp+Nai0+l ) = z, V z l V y. Since for each j 1=1 1=1
such that 0 < j 5 N - 2, j N( i - 1) - r (mod e) we have j = r + bJe for some
b > 0, 5 ( $ + 1 , y y - l ) + l '+b~e+l, 7 ~ i r + ~ a i o + l ) = v x? 3 -
1=1 = C ( r l
1=1 follows that X I , y , and z,, 0 5 r 5 e - 1, generates Hz-'(A) for every i > 1. We
conclude that {xo,xl, y , z, : 0 5 r 5 e - 1) generates He(A) as an algebra. Since
the paths of length a t least N are zero and the product of elements of odd degree
is zero, it is easy t o check that the generators satisfy the claimed relations. I
Theorem 5.8. If N > e, N $ 1 (mod e), char k ( N, and gcd(N,e) = 1, then
H 0 ( A ) is generated US an algebra by {xo, X I , y , z,, w : 0 5 r < e - 1) where xo, X I , y,
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
ebra
ska,
Lin
coln
] at
11:
30 1
4 N
ovem
ber
2014
1630 BARDZELL, LOCATELI, AND MARCOS
z , are as i n Theorem 5.7 and w = 5 (u l , 7 ~ ( i " - 1 - ' ) + 1 ) with in-, the snmllest 1=1
integer greater than zero svch that I V L , ~ - ~ = N - 1 (mod e ) . Furthermore, these
generators satisfy the same relations described i n Theorem 5.7.
Proof. The proof is very similar to the proof of the last theorem , except for the
case N i N - 1 (mod e ) . Since gcd(N,e) = 1, there exists integers i such that
N i - N - 1 (mod e). For these i , HZZ(.l) is generated by z~ and z l where
N i r N - 1 R (mod e ) with 0 5 R _< e -- 1, and H2'-'('1) is generated
as a vector space by ) : O ~ j < N - 2 , j + l ~ O (mode)
{ ~ ( u ~ . ~ ~ ( ' - ' ) ~ ~ ) ) . Since j + 1 0 (mod e) inlplies j z e - 1 (mod e), w have I = : 5 ( 7 f , 7 ; ( 4 + l ) = 2,-1 V z,0 V y for some a 2 0. We can generate the first set
I = 1 . - in the union above using re-:, zo, y, and x l . However, we cannot generate the
last generator above from the set {xo, X I , y , zr : 0 5 r 5 e - 1 ) . So consider iNPl
the smallest integer greater than zero such that NiN-l - N - 1 (mod e). Let
'U = f : ( w , 7 ~ ( ~ ~ - 1 - l ) + 1 ). ~h~~ H ~ N - I - ' (A) is generated by 2,-1, zo, y, XI , and 1=1
Now if i is such that N i r N - 1 (mod e ) then i can be written as i = iN-1 + biO
. w V z i . Thus we have the desired generating set for Ha-'(A). I
For our last result we give a ring presentation for the Hochschild cohomology ring
of a Brauer tree algebra. For a definition and examples of Brauer tree algebras, see
[ARS]. In [HI Holm shows that the even cohomology ring of a Brauer tree algebra is
finitely generated. He also gives a ring presentation. One can compute Hochschild
cohomology groups for Brauer tree algebras using truncated cycle algebras. Let
B ( e , m ) = kZe/Jme+' . In [Ri] Rickard shows the following:
Theorem 5.9. (R i ckard ) Let 11 be a Brauer tree algebra for a Brauer tree T with
e edges and multiplicity m. T h e n H 1 ( h ) H i ( ~ ( e , m)) for every i > 0.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
ebra
ska,
Lin
coln
] at
11:
30 1
4 N
ovem
ber
2014
HOCHSCHILD COHOMOLOGY 1631
Using this result we obtain the cohomology ring for a Brauer tree algebra.
Theorem 5.10. I f N > 1 and N = 1 (mode) then the algebra H O ( A ) zs generated
by {xo ,x l ,? , , y , z , : 1 5 1 < e , O < r S e - 1 ) z f char k { N or by
{ ~ 0 , x ~ , ~ ~ , y , ~ ~ , u ~ : 1 < ~ ~ e ~ O ~ r ~ e - l } zf chark I N . Herexo,xl ,y ,z , , and
w are descrzbed zn Theorem 5.7 and, for each j wzth 1 5 j < e, ZJ = ((7r-1, v,) E
HO(.I) . Furthermore, these generators must satzsfy the relntzons zn Theorem 5 7
and xlV ZJ = y v Z, = z,V ZJ = 0 for 1 5 j 5 e and 1 5 r 5 e - 1. Also,
x , v xJ> = 0 for 1 5 j , j' 5 e.
Corollary 5.11. Let .I be a Brauer tree algebra for a Brauer tree T with e edges
and ntultiplzcity m. Then
i) dimk H O ( A ) = m + e
ii) diml, H2'(11) = dimk H2i-1 (A) = m if z $ 0 (mod e )
iii) If i = 0 (mod e), then
{ I ij c h a r k l m e + l dimk H2'(11) = dimk ~ ~ i - 1 ( A ) =
otherwise
111 this sectim we will show t!?at if niod k:ZC,/JN and mod kZeg / J N are derived
equivalent then e = e' and N = N'. To show this we first note that e is the
rank of the Grothendieck group of ~ z , / J ~ and this rank is invariant by derived
equivalence. So e and e' are equal. Now let A = k Z , / J N and A' = ~ z , / J N ' .
We will prove that if H O ( A ) is isomorphic to H * ( A ' ) as graded rings, then A is
isomorphic t o A'. Since the Hochschild cohomology ring is an invariant of derived
categories. by Rickard7s theorem [Ri2] the desired result will follow.
Assume H O ( A ) 2 H O ( A ' ) . Initially we will also suppose that either char k C NN' or the condition gcd(N, e) # 1 and g c d ( ~ ' , e ) # 1 holds true. We refer to
this condition as Property 1. Unless otherwise stated we shall assume Property 1
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
ebra
ska,
Lin
coln
] at
11:
30 1
4 N
ovem
ber
2014
1632 BARDZELL, LOCATELI, AND MARCOS
throughout this section. After this case has been established we resolve the general
case. Note that if e = 1 then .I = k [ x ] / x N is commutative and is determined by its
derived category. So we may assume e > 1. Write N = me + t and N' = m'e + t' where 0 < t , t' 5 e - 1. We have already seen that
m + e if t = l 111 if t = O o r l
if t = o and dirnH1(2i) = { nz + 1 otherwise
rn + 1 otherwise
Recall that C,(N) = #{j : 0 5 j 2 N-2 and j - ti (mod e) ). Then dim Ha+' (A) =
dim Ha(A) = C,(N) for i 2 1. From this formula we obtain our first corollary.
Corollary 6.1. i) dim HO(A) # dim H1(A) if and only if t = 1.
ti) If t = 1 (i.e. N = me + 1) and He(A) r ~ ' ( i l ' ) then '1 2 '1'.
iii) If e = 2 and H 0 ( h ) EZ H'(A') then A 2 A'.
Now we assume that e > 3. Then it is not difficult to show the following:
Lemma 6.2. i) If t = 0, then Ci(N) = m for every i 2 0 .
ii) If t = 1 , Ci(N) = m.
Lemma 6.3. Assume e > 3, and t # 1 . Let A be the following e-tuple of nnturnl
numbers: A = (C1 (N), ..., C,-1 (N)) . Then
i) If gcd(t, e) = 1 then the e-tuple A has t-1 entries equal to m+l and e-t+l entries
equal to m.
ii) If gcd(t, e) = a # 1 or t = 0, then the e-tuple A has t entries equal to m+l and
e-t entries equal to m.
Proof. i) Since gcd(t, e) = 1 = gcd(N, e) the set NO, N1, ..., N(e - 1) of residue {- - -7
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
ebra
ska,
Lin
coln
] at
11:
30 1
4 N
ovem
ber
2014
HOCHSCHILD COHOMOLOGY 1633
classes modulo e is a complete residue class. Using this fact and part (ii) of Lemma
6.2 the result follows.
ii) The result is clear if t = 0. So assume t # 0 and cu = gcd(t,e). Write -
e = ELI and t = L. Then we have N i z t i a(t i) (mod e) and, for each j with
0 2 j 5 E - 1, there is some integer ij such that ti, zi Ni r ja (mod e). We now -- -
consider the e-tuple B = (NO, N1, ..., N ( e - 1)) where I denotes the representative
of I (mod e) between 0 and e - 1. In the e-tuple B each j n appears 0 times because -- - -- -
( X O : N l , ..., Ar(e - 1)) = (3, ..., (E- l ) a t , to, ..., (E- l ) n t , ...). Since cu > 2 wc have
that the liu111her of times which all entry in the e-tuple B is less than or q u a 1 to
t - 2 is a t = t . Since this is precisely the number of times that we obtain an entry
equal to m + 1 in the e-tuple A, we have the desired result. I
We conclude the following
Corollary 6.4. i ) dim Hi(A) = dim Hj(,l) for every i,j if and only if t = 0.
ii) If t = 0 and dim Hi(A) = dim ~ ' ( ' 4 ' ) for every i then A r A'.
Corollary 6.5. If dim H1(A) = dim H ~ ( A ' ) for every i then m = mJ
Proof. From corollary 6.1 and corollary 6.4 we can assume t # 0 and t # 1. Then
m + 1 = dim H Y A ) . I
From now on we assume that A = k Z , / J N and A' = k ~ , / J N ' , where N = me+t,
N' = r n e + t l , t $ { 0 , 1 ) , a n d e > 3 . supPoset s t ' .
Corollary 6.6. If dim H i ( A ) = dim H ~ ( A ' ) for all i then A 2 A' or
i ) t' = t + 1 and
ii) gcd(t + 1, e) = 1 and gcd(t, e) # 1.
Proof. Since we know rn we can determine the number of times that m + 1 appears
in the e-tuple ,A. Let z be this number. Then t , t' E { x , x + 1) . .Assume that t # t ' .
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
ebra
ska,
Lin
coln
] at
11:
30 1
4 N
ovem
ber
2014
1634 BARDZELL, LOCATELI, AND MARCOS
Then we can conclude (i). If t' is not coprime with e then by Lemma 6.3 we have
t' = a: which is not possible. I
Proposition 6.7. Assume that dim Hf(A) = dim ~ ' ( 1 1 ' ) for all i. Then '1 E '1'.
Proof. Assume that A 11'. Corollary 6.6 allows us to assume that
1) N' = N + 1
2) gcd(N' , e) = 1 and gcd(N, e) # 1.
Let cuE = e and a t = t where (Y = gcd(N, e) and 2 5 e , Z We have E
{ o , ~ , ..., (?- 1 ) ~ ) if and only if (t + 1)i E {g,T, ..., (t - 1)). Now let j be such that
( t + l ) j - 1 (mod e). Then for 0 5 k 5 e - 1 we have Ck, ( N ) = m + 1 if and only
if 0 5 k 5 t - 1 = t' - 2. If we consider the e-tuple
then the first t entries of this n-tuple are equal to m + 1 and the rest are equal t o
m.
The hypothesis implies that C = (Co(N), C,(N), Cz, (N), ..., C(,-l)j(N)). Since
( m + 1 ) j = 1 (mod e) we have that gcd(j, e) = 1. So the subgroup generated by F in Z/Ze is the group generated by 2 which is, in turn, the group generated by Z.
Therefore, for some r with 0 5 r 5 t - 1 we have t r j TQ t (mod e). To see this
consider the set (0, t j , 2tj, ..., (t - 2) t j ) . Then there exists some X < A' such that
Xtj = A' t j . So (A' - X)tj 0 (mod e) and {n, G, ..., (A' - X)tj} is the subgroup of
Z/Ze generated by 2. Therefore there is some .u 5 t - 2 such that u t j r f (mod e).
Then C,(N) = m and we get a contradiction. I
Now do not assume Property 1. As previously noted, if N r 0 or 1 (mod e), then
~ ' ( k 2 , I . l ~ ) E H'(LZ, / J~ ' ) if and only if N = N'. So assume N = me + t and
N' = m'e + t' where 2 5 t, < e - 1. Using previous arguments it is not difficult
t o show that m = m'. As a consequence of the ring structure of Hm(i1) and H'(A')
we have that char k I N and gcd(N, e) = 1 if char k I N 'and . g r d ( ~ ' , e) = 1. So we
can always assume that char k NN' or that gcd(N,ej # 1 and gcd(N',e) # 1.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
ebra
ska,
Lin
coln
] at
11:
30 1
4 N
ovem
ber
2014
HOCHSCHILD COHOMOLOGY 1635
Finally we note that it is possible for H ' ( ~ Z , / J ~ ) H*(kZ, t /J" ' ) with e # e'
as the following example shows.
E x a m p l e 6.1. Given any integer i 2 2 , H e ( k Z r , + l / ~ ' ) E ~ * ( k Z d , + z / J ? as
graded rings. See [Ci].
In this section we provide some non-truncated examples. As a niotivatio~i, let us
first recall a result of Cibils. In [Ci] algebras of the fonri 11 = k - r / JL are considered.
Here r need not be a 2, cycle. Cibils shows that H e ( A ) is finitely generated if
arid only if J? = 2,. At this point one may ask whether He( i i ) is finitely generated
when r = 2, and I is any admissible ideal. It turns out that the answer is no as
the following example shows.
E x a m p l e 7.1 Let r = Z5 and I =< alaza3, a2a3a4,adnSal > . Then the projec-
tives from the minimal projective resolution of i i = k Z 5 / I satisfy P2 = P5 = P8 =
. . . , P3 = P6 = P9 = ... , a n d P4 = P7 = Plo = .. . . Also, F'; = 0, P3f = ku2@kvq,
and P,' = Lal $ ka2as $ ka4. So the Hochschild cohomology of A = kZ , / I is
determined from the following complex:
5 * 4' $* $* 0 --+ U kv, -% U ka, 4 0 4 kvp $ ku4 -% kal $ kaaa3 @ ka4
z= 1 1=1
4. 4' Using the boundary maps from [BM] we see 2.2 -% ( a l , aza3,O) and v4 -%
0; @ * ( 0 , anas, ad). Similarly, vz ---+ ( a l , -aza3,0) and v4 4 (0, anas, -a4) . From this
complex we can now compute H1'(A) = ker$i+l / Ini4; for all n 2 0. It is easy
to check the non-zero cohomology groups are H O ( h ) and H n ( A ) for n 1 (mod
3). Moreover, these non-zero groups all have dimension 1. However, this means
that if i , j > 0, then Hi(.k) V H3(A) H i f j ( A ) = 0 since i + j f 1 (mod 3).
So multiplication in non-zero degrees is always zero. It follows that H e ( A ) is not
finitely generated.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
ebra
ska,
Lin
coln
] at
11:
30 1
4 N
ovem
ber
2014
1636 BARDZELL, LOCATELI, AND MARCOS
In example 7.1, the cohomology ring was not finitely generated because there
are "gaps" between the non-zero cohomology groups. However, even if all of the
groups are non-zero, the cohomology ring need not be finitely generated. We show
this with the following example.
Example 7.2 Let h = kZe/ < y t f l > . Recall that is the unique path of
length e + 1 beginning a t the vertex vl . Then the minimal Ae- resolution of A is
given by Q 4 - - - + P n - - I t . - % P 1 4 P 0 4 ! i , O
e e where Po = LI iiv @ vil, Pl = ,II iio(a) @ t(a).i, and P,, = Awl @ v z h for all n > 2.
r = l 2=1
Here T is the nlultiplication map, 41(o(a) @ t ( a ) ) = n ~i t (a ) - o(a) @ a for each
arrow n, 4,,(vl @ 212) = .UL CP a2a3 . . . nl + ala2 . . . ne c% u:! if 11 > 2 is ovel~, and
4 n ( v l @ ~ 2 ) = ala? . . . ae@va -vl@aza3 . . . al if n 2 2 isodd. So P,' = vliiv2 = kal
for each n 2 2. So the Hochschild cohomology of A is determined by the following
complex:
6;"-1 Q- . . . --+ kal --+ kal -% kal t .. .
Note that = q5Zn = 0 for each n 2 2. So H2(A) r Horna. ( P I , A) is one-
dimensional for i > 3.
Now let q €Horn,\. (Pi, A) for some i 2 2 with q(ul @ u2) = a. Define ?ji : Pi --+
PO by q,(vl@v2) = a1 @vz , 7i+l : Pa+l ---i PI by q2+1(v1 @vq) = v1 @a2 . . . a1 ,and - qi+j : Pi+j --+ Pj by qi+j(vl @ v 2 ) = ~1 @ a z . . . a l .
Consider the following diagrams:
P,+l #i+! Pa P. $+I . @-~-tr Pi+j-l
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
ebra
ska,
Lin
coln
] at
11:
30 1
4 N
ovem
ber
2014
HOCHSCHILD COHOMOLOGY 1637
So the left diagram commutes. For the right diagram, consider
71i+J-141+j(t11 @up) = qif jPl (vl @ a 2 . . . al -a1 ... a n @ v 2 ) = -a1 . . . a , @ a p . . . al.
Also, @,r11+j(r9 8 vz) = dJ(vl @ a' . . . a l ) = -a1 ... a , 8 a? . . . a l . Thus, the right
diagram also commutes. Note that v , + ~ is not an isomorpliisn~. Let [ : Pi -+ A
where E # 0. Then [ qi+, = A[ since dim Hom(Pi, A) = 1. So <(qi+, - X I ) = 0.
Now, qi+, E rad End(P,+j). So if X # 0 then qi+j - X is invertible. Then it must
be the case that X = 0. This means 6 v ~ + ~ = 0. Iterating this argument we have
that H'( . I )HJ(: i ) = 0 for i j j > 1. Notice that in this example not even the even
cohomology ring He"(A) = LI HZn(,I) is finitely generated. n>O
7.1. Concluding Remarks. In [Ha] Happel shows that if a finite dimensional
algebra I\ has an infinite dimensional Hochschild cohomology ring, then A has
infinite global dimension. He then states that the converse is not known. For the
algebras is this paper the converse does hold (see [Lo] for the truncated case). X
related question is the following. When is the Hochschild cohomology ring of a finite
dimensional monomial algebra finitely generated ? A particularly nice relation set
is J'. In this case A P ( n ) is precisely all paths of length n for each n 2 0. So
this case seems like a natural candidate to look for finitely generated cohomology
rings. However, Cibils shows (see [Ci]) that if r contains an oriented cycle, then
H ' ( k r / J 2 ) is finitely generated if and only if r = 2,. We have also seen that
having the underlying quiver of A be a cycle is not sufficient to guarantee that
H e ( A ) is finitely generated. As a consequence, it appears that it is fairly special
for the cohoinology ring of a finite dimensional monomial algebra of infinite global
dimension to be finitely generated. It would be interesting to classify the monomial
algebras for which the Hochschild cohomology rings are finitely generated.
The authors would like to thank Bernhard Keller for providing valu-
able suggestions for this work.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
ebra
ska,
Lin
coln
] at
11:
30 1
4 N
ovem
ber
2014
1638 BARDZELL, LOCATELI, AND MARCOS
The second author would like to thank CNPq from Brazil for a PhD
scholarship.
The third author would like to thank CNPq from Brazil for a research
grant and FAPESP from Brazil for a scholarship.
[ARS] hI. Auslander, I. Reiten, S. Smalo, Representation Theory of Artin Alge-
bras, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 36, 1995.
[B] M.J. Bardzell, The Alternating Syzygy Behavior of Monomial Algebras, Jour-
nal of Algebra 188, 69-89, 1997.
[BRI] h1.J. Bardzell, E.N. Marcos, hduced Boundary Maps for the Cohomology
of Monomial and Auslander Algebras, Algebras and Modules 11, CMS Conference
Proceedings, Vol. 24, 1998.
[Ci] C. Cibils, Hochschild Cohomology Algebra of Radical Square Zero Algebras,
Algebras and hloduels 11, ChlS Conference Proceedings, Vol. 24, 1998.
[EH] K. Erdmann, T . Holm, Twisted Bimodules and Hochschild Cohornology for
Self-Injective Algebras of Class A,, to appear in Forum Rlathematicum.
[GHZ] E.L. Green, D. Happel, D. Zacharia, Projective Resolutions over Artin
Algebras with Zero Relations, Illinois Journal of Math. 29, 180-190, 1985.
[ ~ z j E,L. G ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , n u. v--L--:- bauialla, The C o X ~ i i i ~ l ~ g j i Rimj of a M o m m i d P,lge5:a,
hlanuscripta Mathematica 85, 11-23, 1994.
[Ha] D. Happel, Hochschild Cohomology of Finite-Dimensional Algebras, Springer
Lecture Notes 1404, 108-126, 1984.
[HI T. Holm, Hochschild Cohomology of Brauer Tree Algebras,
Communications in Algebra, vol 26, issue 11.
[LO] A.C. Locateli, Hochschild Cohomology of Truncated Quiver Algebras, Comm.
in Algebra, vol 27, issue 2.
[Lo21 -4.C. Locateli, Cohomologia de Hochschild de Algebras Truncadas, Ph .D.
thesis, ME-US?, Departmento MatemAtica, 1998.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
ebra
ska,
Lin
coln
] at
11:
30 1
4 N
ovem
ber
2014
HOCHSCHILD COHOMOLOGY 1639
[hi] S. hIacLane, Homology, Springer-Verlag,1963.
[Ri] J . Rickard, Derived Categories and Stable Equivalence, Journal of Pure and
Applied Algebra 61, 303-317,1989.
[Ri2] J. Rickard, Morita Theory For Derived Categories, J . London hlatli. Soc.
39, 436-456, 1989.
[W] C. R'eibel, A n Introduction t o Homological Algebra, Cambridge Studies in
Advanced Mathematics Vol. 38, 1994.
[Z] P. Zhang, Hochschild Cohomology of Truncated Basic Cycle, Science in China
1'01. 40 No. 12, 1272-1278, 1997.
Received: January 1999
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
ebra
ska,
Lin
coln
] at
11:
30 1
4 N
ovem
ber
2014