on-line charging=increased revenue

4
Zimmermann/JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY NURSING ted for a trial period; a minimum of 6 months is recommended. In the initial phases of the pro- gram, it is important that the manager refrain from intervening in conflict resolution or allow- ing the staff members to abdicate decision mak- ing to management when problems arise. Changes in staff attitudes to assume responsibil- ity for unit coverage emerge, in part, as a result of observing the consequences when it is not done. 2. At least 1 year, and often almost 2 years, are required to achieve smooth-flowing systems. 3. Time is needed for the staff members to become proficient in negotiation. The key to mutual coop- eration is that everyone eventually experiences a need for a change in his or her particular schedule. The staff may need assistance in learning how to perceive possible changes or how to approach oth- ers. 4. Problems are usually resolved by staff-suggested rule additions or modifications. Rules can be used to help enforce consideration and fairness, but a noncompliant person may need individual atten- tion. The consistent themes that emerge in discus- sions about self-scheduling are that it is a continu- ally evolving process, but one that both staff and management ultimately prefer. Many thanks to Belinda Mertz, RN, BSN (FHP Hospital); Tammy Koslenko, RN, BS (St. Joseph's Hospital); Chris- tine Doner, RN, BA (The Hospital for Sick Children); Judy Sharstrom, RN, BSN, CEN (Rice Memorial Hospital); Theresa Larsen, RN, BSN (Hoffman Estates Medical Cen- ter); and Shirley Wolford, RN, MSN, CEN (CGH Medical Center), for their assistance with this column. References 1. Griesmer H. Self-scheduling turned us into a winning team. RN 1993;56:21-3. 2. Alexander C, Palladino M, Evans B, Harp K, Marable K, Whitmer K. The art of the deal. Am J Nurs 1993;93:70-4. 3. Hensinger B, Harkins D, Bruce T. Self-scheduling: two success stories. Am J Nurs 1993;93:66-7. 4. Bischof J. Self-scheduling in critical care. Crit Care Nurse 1993;12:50-5. 5. Belanger D, Snell C, Fortier W. Self-scheduling on trial. Can Nurse 1992;87:17-9. A s health care becomes increasingly cost con- scious, it is essential that charging of resources utilized be accurate and timely. To meet this objec- tive, on July 1, 1993, we implemented computeriza- tion of ED charges as part of our ED computer-track- ing project. Overall the process was very successful. It decreased workload for clerks, data processing employees, and nurses, and resulted in increased revenues for the department. Old charge system Previously a one-page charge sheet was included in each chart pack (Table 1). The registered nurse who dispositioned the patient checked the appropriate ED level and other charges as needed and returned this form to the clerk. Clerical staff batched these forms daily and took them to data processing for data entry. The nurse assigned a level charge based on the amount of nursing care delivered. The major- ity of the supply charges were captured with a sup- ply label system. The supply process is still used J EMERG NURS1995;21:61-4 Copyright 9 1995 by the Emergency Nurses Association. 0099-1767/95 $3.00 4- 0 18/82/80848 February 1995 61

Upload: vicky-bradley

Post on 15-Sep-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Zimmermann/JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY NURSING

t ed for a trial period; a m in imum of 6 months is r ecommended . In the ini t ial phases of the pro- gram, it is impor tan t tha t the manage r refrain from in te rven ing in conflict resolut ion or allow- ing the staff m e m b e r s to abd ica t e decis ion mak- ing to m a n a g e m e n t when problems arise. Changes in staff a t t i t udes to a s sume responsibi l - ity for unit coverage emerge, in part, as a result of observing the consequences when it is not done.

2. At least 1 year, and often almost 2 years, are required to achieve smooth-flowing systems.

3. Time is needed for the staff members to become proficient in negotiation. The key to mutual coop- eration is that everyone eventual ly experiences a need for a change in his or her particular schedule. The staff may need assis tance in learning how to perceive possible changes or how to approach oth- ers.

4. Problems are usually resolved by staff-suggested rule addi t ions or modifications. Rules can be used to help enforce consideration and fairness, but a noncompliant person may need individual atten- tion.

The cons is ten t t hemes tha t emerge in discus- s ions about se l f -schedul ing are tha t it is a continu- al ly evolving process, but one tha t both staff and m a n a g e m e n t u l t ima te ly prefer.

Many thanks to Belinda Mertz, RN, BSN (FHP Hospital); Tammy Koslenko, RN, BS (St. Joseph's Hospital); Chris- tine Doner, RN, BA (The Hospital for Sick Children); Judy Sharstrom, RN, BSN, CEN (Rice Memorial Hospital); Theresa Larsen, RN, BSN (Hoffman Estates Medical Cen- ter); and Shirley Wolford, RN, MSN, CEN (CGH Medical Center), for their assistance with this column.

References

1. Griesmer H. Sel f -schedul ing turned us into a winn ing team. RN 1993;56:21-3. 2. Alexander C, Pal ladino M, Evans B, Harp K, Marable K, Whi tmer K. The art of the deal. Am J Nurs 1993;93:70-4. 3. Hens inger B, Harkins D, Bruce T. Self-scheduling: two success stories. Am J Nurs 1993;93:66-7. 4. Bischof J. Sel f -schedul ing in critical care. Crit Care Nurse 1993;12:50-5. 5. Belanger D, Snell C, Fortier W. Self -schedul ing on trial. Can Nurse 1992;87:17-9.

A s hea l th care becomes increas ing ly cost con- scious, it is essen t ia l tha t charg ing of resources

ut i l ized be accura te and t imely. To mee t this objec- tive, on Ju ly 1, 1993, we i m p l e m e n t e d computer iza- t ion of ED charges as par t of our ED computer- t rack- ing project. Overall the process was very successful. It dec reased work load for clerks, da ta process ing employees , and nurses, and resu l ted in inc reased revenues for the depar tment .

Old charge system Previously a one-page charge shee t was inc luded in each char t pack (Table 1). The reg i s t e red nurse who

d i spos i t ioned the pa t i en t checked the appropr ia te ED level and other charges as n e e d e d and re turned this form to the clerk. Clerical staff ba t ched these forms dai ly and took them to da ta process ing for da ta entry. The nurse a s s igned a level charge b a s e d on the amount of nurs ing care del ivered. The major- i ty of the supply charges were cap tu red with a sup- ply labe l system. The supply process is still used

J EMERG NURS 1995;21:61-4 Copyright �9 1995 by the Emergency Nurses Association. 0099-1767/95 $3.00 4- 0 18/82/80848

February 1995 61

JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY NURSING/Bradley

UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HOSPITAL CHANDLER MEDICAL CENTER LEXINGTON, KENTUCKY

EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT CHARGES

INSTRUCTIONS: Use this form dur ing computer downt ime only . Clerical wi l l enter the correct charges once the computer is back on- l ine. Do not batch th is form. File this charge sheet with the ye l low copies o f char t fo rms after charge is entered. Do not use th is fo rm for direct admits or Aeromedical d irect admits who do not receive care in the Emergency Department. These pat ients do no t require an ED charge.

53120 _ _ Level 1, 10-20 minutes Nursing Care

53130 Level 2, 20-50 minutes Nursing Care

53135 Level 3, 50~ minutes Nursing Care

53140 Level 4, 90-150 minutes Nursing Care

53150 Level 5, 150-240 minutes Nursing Care

53101 Clink: Visit (KENPAC denials, LWBS, wound check)

53184 _ _ UK Suture Removal

53185 UK Physician call bask

53181 Decon I: Urgent

5 3 1 8 2 Decon Ih Emergent

53186 Fast Track Level 1

53187 Fast Track Lever 2

53188 Fast Track Level 3

53189 Fast Track Suture Removal

ADDITIONAL CHARGES

53165 _ _ Observation Level 3 per hour

53170 _ _ Observation Level 4 per hour

53180 _ _ Observation Level 5 per hour

58201 Oxygen per hour

53998 _ _ Glucose monitoring

53155 Trauma Alert

t 53402 Cast, Long Arm

5 3 4 1 3 _ _ Cast, Sho~ Arm

53404 Cast, Long Leg

5340J Cast, Short Leg

53406 Cast, Shoulder Spice

53442 _ _ Splint, Long Arm

53450 Splim Arm (Piaster)

53441 Splint, Cock Up Wrist

53476 5p![nt. Poe!crier P.Cnee

53479 Sugar Tongs

53445 Thumb Spica

Attach to yellow copies of chart forms. Hl17 (Rev. 7/93) CH Do not send this form to Medical Record Department or Inpatient Unit.

Figure 1 Paper charge form. This form is currently used charges are entered in the computer by clerical when the computer system is not operational, staff when the system is working. The RN records charges on this form, and the

t h r o u g h o u t the hosp i ta l a n d was not a l t e red as par t of th is c h a n g e process.

We iden t i f i ed m a n y w e a k n e s s e s w i th the paper sys tem, i n c l u d i n g the following:

�9 The re w a s no process to e n s u r e tha t all r eg i s t e red ED p a t i e n t s rece ived an ED charge. For example , cha rge shee t s were s en t to the appropr ia te nurs - ing floor w i th p a t i e n t s who were admi t t ed , wh i c h

r e su l t ed in de lays in c h a r g i n g or omiss ion of an ED charge.

a Reg i s te red n u r s e s forgot to charge for some pa- t i en t charges , espec ia l ly for t r a u m a alerts a nd ob- se rva t ion charges .

�9 Charges were not a lways e n t e r e d in the b i l l i ng s y s t e m in a cons is ten t , t i m e l y fashion, wh ich re- su l t ed in la te charges or de lays in pa t i e n t bi l l ing.

62 Volume 21, Number 1

Bradley/JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY NUI~SING

UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL 09120194 15:57

CAT. KITTY I 020402021148 CURR

EO TRACKING PATIENT CHARGING SELECT CRARGE(S)ISELECT ENTER . . . . . . * ~ 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6

DEPARTMENTAL CHARGES LEVEL ! - 10-20 MIN NURSING CARE LEVEL 2 - 20-50 MIN NURSING CARE LEVEL 3 - 50-90 MIN NURSING CARE LEVEL 4 - 90-150 MIN NURSING CARE LEVEL 5 - 190-240 MIN NURSING CARE CLINIC VISIT (KENPAC DENIAL. LNBS, WOUND CHECK) UK SUTURE REMOVAL UK PHYSICIAN CALL BACK DECON I: URGENT DECON IT: EMERGENT FAST TRACK LEVEL I FAST TRACK LEVEL IT FAST TRACK LEVEL I l l FAST TRACK SUTURE REMOVAL

DEFER PATIENT CHARGES ENTER DEPARTMENT CHARGE

RETURN MASTER CSQGI2A CLINIPAC USERi VICKY BRADLEY TERMINAL IO: D783

4B/ Aa O0--SESSION3 R i C I 15:53 9120194

Figure 2 First charge screen. DECON, Decontamination; LWBS, left without being seen; UK, University of Kentucky.

UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL 09/20194 15:55 CAT, KITTY E-R 02040202-1148 ED TRACKING PATIENT CHARGE REVIEW ENTER OR CORRECT/PRESS ENTER . . . . . . . . , , ~ 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6 . . . . . ~

DEPARTMENTAL CHARGE ? L2

STAFF INITIALS : VB :

OTHER CHARGES : : OXYGEN (PER HOUR} : : BLOOD GLUCOSE (#) : : TRAUMA ALERT (Y)

OBSERVATION CHARGES (ENTER NUMBER OF HOURG)

: :LEVEL 3 : :LEVEL 4 : :LEVEL 5

ORTHOPEDIC SUPPLIES (ENTER I OR 2) : : CAST. LONG ARM : : CAST. SHORT ARM : : CAST, LONG LEG : : CAST, SHORT LEG

: : CAST. SHOULDER SPICA : : SPLINT, LONG ARM : : SPLINT, ARM (PLASTER)

: : SPLINT. COCK UP WRIST : : SPLINT, POSTERIOR KNEE

: : SUGAR TONGS : : THUMB SPICA

Please review thi~ data before Eonts ACCEPT

CSOGI2B CLINIPAC USER: VICKY BRAOLEY 4DC Aa DO--SESSION3 R 7 C 21

Figure 3 Second charge screen. L2, Level 2.

MASTER

TERNtNAL ID: DZG3 [5:51 q/20/94

February 1995 63

JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY NURSING/Bradley

�9 T h e r e w a s no s i m p l e m e t h o d to a u d i t t h e a c c u r a c y of t h e c h a r g e leve l a s s i g n e d b y the n u r s e b e c a u s e t h e r e w a s no r eco rd of t h e p a t i e n t c h a r g e leve l on t h e ED record.

�9 T h e r e w e r e no r epo r t s t h a t i d e n t i f i e d p a t i e n t s w h o h a d no t r e c e i v e d a c h a r g e or i n s t a n c e s w h e n pa- t i e n t c h a r g e s w e r e incorrec t .

On-line computerized charge process A s of J u l y 1993, w e c o n v e r t e d t h e p a p e r form to a c o m p u t e r i z e d form, a n d l i n k e d the c h a r g e p r o c e s s to p a t i e n t d i s p o s i t i o n from t h e ED t r a c k i n g sys - t em. Now, as t h e r e g i s t e r e d n u r s e s e l ec t s p a t i e n t d i s p o s i t i o n (e.g., d i s c h a r g e , admi t , t ransfer ) , two c h a r g e s c r e e n s a re a u t o m a t i c a l l y d i s p l a y e d , one af te r t h e other . T h e n u r s e h a s to e n t e r t he pa - t i e n t c h a r g e s to d i s p o s i t i o n t h e p a t i e n t a n d free t r e a t m e n t b e d s in t h e t r a c k i n g sy s t em. On t h e first sc reen , d i s p l a y e d in T a b l e 2, t he n u r s e s e l ec t s one c h a r g e level . The n u r s e t h e n e n t e r s h is or he r i n i t i a l s a n d a n y o the r ED c h a r g e s (Tab l e 3). If t h e n u r s e is u n s u r e of t h e cor rec t cha rge , t h e de - f e r r ed op t ion is s e l ec t ed . Da ta for all p a t i e n t s w i t h d e f e r r e d c h a r g e s a r e s t o r e d in a " d e f e r r e d c e n s u s " c o m p u t e r file. R e c o r d s for t h e s e p a t i e n t s r e m a i n in t h i s c a t e g o r y un t i l t h e c h a r g e s a re m a d e . RNs a n d c h a r g e n u r s e s a re e n c o u r a g e d to c h e c k th i s c e n s u s d a i l y to e n s u r e t h a t al l p a t i e n t c h a r g e s a re e n t e r e d .

A d d i t i o n a l l y , a c h a r g e a u d i t r epor t is g e n e r a t e d a n d r e v i e w e d d a i l y for p o t e n t i a l errors. E x a m p l e s of a u d i t f i l ters are:

�9 A d m i t t e d p a t i e n t s c h a r g e d less t h a n a leve l 3 �9 P a t i e n t s w i t h ch ie f c o m p l a i n t of s u t u r e r e m o v a l

c h a r g e d for s e rv i ce o t h e r t h a n a s u t u r e r e m o v a l c h a r g e

�9 P a t i e n t s c h a r g e d two l eve l s h i g h e r or lower t h a n the i r in i t i a l a c u i t y leve l

�9 P a t i e n t s w i t h l e n g t h s of s t a y g r e a t e r t h a n 8 hour s w i t h o u t o b s e r v a t i o n c h a r g e s

C h a r t s of t h e p a t i e n t s l i s t e d on the a u d i t re- po r t a re r e v i e w e d a n d c h a r g e co r rec t ions a re sub - m i t t e d . The a u d i t is d e s i g n e d to c a p t u r e t h e m o s t c o m m o n c h a r g e errors. F e e d b a c k on c o m m o n errors is c o m m u n i c a t e d b y m e a n s of t h e d e p a r t m e n t n e w s l e t t e r a n d a t s taff m e e t i n g s . C h a r g e n u r s e s p r o v i d e f e e d b a c k to s taff m e m b e r s w h e n t r e n d s de - ve lop for an i n d i v i d u a l . T h e t r a u m a a le r t log a lso is c h e c k e d b i w e e k l y to e n s u r e t h a t al l t r a u m a a l e r t s a re c h a r g e d .

Evaluation of the new charge process T h e r e are m a n y p o s i t i v e m e r i t s to t h e n e w c h a r g e s y s t e m . The major b e n e f i t s a re a s fol lows:

�9 E l i m i n a t i o n of d a t a e n t r y of a p p r o x i m a t e l y 100 c h a r g e s h e e t s pe r d a y

�9 E l i m i n a t i o n of c l e r i ca l role in f i n d i n g a n d b a t c h i n g c h a r g e forms

�9 E l i m i n a t i o n of a p a p e r form for t h e n u r s i n g s taff �9 D e c r e a s e d v a r i a b i l i t y of p a t i e n t c h a r g e s a m o n g

n u r s e s �9 E n s u r e d ED c h a r g e s for all p a t i e n t s �9 I n c r e a s e d c h a r g e s c a p t u r e d from t h e pr ior yea r �9 I n c r e a s e d a v e r a g e c h a r g e pe r p a t i e n t b y 13% �9 I n c r e a s e d t i m e l i n e s s of p o s t i n g of ED c h a r g e �9 Prov is ion of a m e c h a n i s m to cor rec t e r r o n e o u s pa-

t i e n t c h a r g e s be fore b i l l ing , t h e r e b y d e c r e a s i n g p a t i e n t c o m p l a i n t s

A l t h o u g h t h e n e w p r o c e s s h a s h a d pos i t i ve re- sul ts , t h e r e is s t i l l room for i m p r o v e m e n t . P r o b l e m s w i t h t h e n e w s y s t e m i n c l u d e t h e fo l lowing:

�9 O v e r s i g h t s in r e m o v a l of p a t i e n t d a t a from the de - f e r r ed c e n s u s

�9 V a r i a b i l i t y a m o n g n u r s e s in s e l ec t i on of t h e c h a r g e level , a l t h o u g h less f r e q u e n t t h a n in t he p a s t

�9 O m i s s i o n s of s o m e o p t i o n a l c h a r g e s such as t he t r a u m a a le r t c h a r g e

�9 T i m e - c o n s u m i n g co r rec t ion p rocess , r e q u i r i n g ap- p r o x i m a t e l y 60 to 90 m i n u t e s d a i l y

Summary A l t h o u g h the n e w ED c h a r g e s y s t e m is no t perfect , i t h a s r e s u l t e d in i m p r o v e d c h a r g i n g for s e rv i ce s de l i ve r e d ; t h i s i n c r e a s e in cor rec t c h a r g e s h a s more t h a n offset t h e r e s o u r c e s to d e v e l o p t h e en t i r e t r a c k i n g s y s t e m p ro j ec t w i t h i n 1 year . Th i s is one e x a m p l e in w h i c h c o m p u t e r i z a t i o n p a i d for itself, w h i c h s h o u l d h e l p ED m a n a g e r s jus t i fy c o m p u t e r - i za t ion of the i r d e p a r t m e n t s .

It is h o p e d t h a t m o r e ef fec t ive c h a r g e s y s t e m s wi l l occur a s a c o m p o n e n t of t h e c o m p u t e r i z e d pa- t i e n t r eco rd in w h i c h t h e p a t i e n t c h a r g e is ca lcu- l a t e d on t h e b a s i s of p r e s e t f o rmu la s for t h e a m o u n t of r e s o u r c e s u t i l i zed , t h u s e l i m i n a t i n g s u b j e c t i v i t y in c h a r g i n g . Wi th t h e c a p t u r e of all s e rv i ce s ren- d e r e d , e v a l u a t i o n of p r a c t i c e p a t t e r n s a n d o u t c o m e s w o u l d a l l o w the ED s taff to i d e n t i f y ef fec t ive t r ea t - m e n t r e g i m e n s . Hopefu l ly , u n n e c e s s a r y t e s t s or t r e a t m e n t s can b e e l i m i n a t e d to p r o m o t e a d e c r e a s e in r e sou rce u t i l i z a t i on a n d cos t s w i t h o u t compro- m i s i n g q u a l i t y p a t i e n t care.

G4 Volume 21, Number 1