olmec crystalink

8/13/2019 Olmec Crystalink

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/olmec-crystalink 1/45

31/10/2013 Olmec Civilization - Crystalinks

www.crystalinks.com/olmec.html

Olmec Civilization

The first signs of complex society in Mesoamerica were the Olmecs an ancient Pre-Columbian civilization living in the tropicallowlands of south-central Mexico, in what are roughly the modern-day states of Veracruz and Tabasco. The area is about 125 milelong and 50 miles wide (200 by 80 km), with the Coatzalcoalcos River system running through the middle. These sites include SanLorenzo Tenochtitlan, Laguna de los Cerros, Tres Zapotes, and La Venta, one of the greatest of the Olmec sites. La Venta is datedto between 1200 BCE through 400 BCE which places the major development of the city in the Middle Formative Period. Located

on an island in a coastal swamp overlooking the then-active Rio Palma river, the city of La Venta probably controlled a region between the Mezcalapa and Coatzacoalcos rivers.

The Olmec domain extended from the Tuxtlas mountains in the west to the lowlands of the Chontalpa in the east, a region withsignificant variations in geology and ecology. Over 170 Olmec monuments have been found within the area, and eighty percent of those occur at the three largest Olmec centers, La Venta, Tabasco (38%), San Lorenzo Tenochtitlan, Veracruz (30%), and Lagunade los Cerros, Veracruz (12%).

Those three major Olmec centers are spaced from east to west across the domain so that each center could exploit, control, and provide a distinct set of natural resources valuable to the overall Olmec economy. La Venta, the eastern center, is near the richestuaries of the coast, and also could have provided cacao, rubber, and salt. San Lorenzo, at the center of the Olmec domain,

controlled the vast flood plain area of Coatzacoalcos basin and riverline trade routes.Laguna de los Cerros, adjacent to the Tuxtlas mountains, is positioned near important sources of basalt, a stone needed tomanufacture manos, metates, and monuments. Perhaps marriage alliances between Olmec centers helped maintain such an exchangenetwork.

The Olmec heartland is an archaeological term used to describe an area in the Gulf lowlands that is generally considered the birthplace of the Olmec culture. This area is characterized by swampy lowlands punctuated by low hills, ridges, and volcanoes. TheTuxtlas Mountains rise sharply in the north, along the Gulf of Mexico's Bay of Campeche. Here the Olmecs constructed permanentcity-temple complexes at San Lorenzo Tenochtitlan, La Venta, Tres Zapotes, and Laguna de los Cerros. In this region, the firstMesoamerican civilization would emerge and reign from 1400-400 BCE.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olmec_heartland




www.crystalinks.com/olmec.html 2

The Olmec flourished during Mesoamerica's Formative period, dating roughly from 1400 BCE to about 400 BCE. As the firstMesoamerican civilization, they laid much of the foundation for the civilizations that would follow. Their influence went beyond theheartland - from Chalcatzingo, far to the west in the highlands of Mexico, to Izapa, on the Pacific coast near what is nowGuatemala, Olmec goods have been found throughout Mesoamerica during this period.

Origins

What we today call Olmec first appears within the city of San Lorenzo Tenochtitlan, where distinctive Olmec features appear around 1400 BCE. The rise of civilization here was assisted by the local ecology of well-watered alluvial soil, as well as by thetransportation network that the Coatzacoalcos river basin provided.

This environment may be compared to that of other ancient centers of civilization: the Nile, Indus, and Yellow River valleys, andMesopotamia. This highly productive environment encouraged a dense concentrated population which in turn triggered the rise of anelite class.

It was this elite class that provided the social basis for the production of the symbolic and sophisticated luxury artifacts that defineOlmec culture. Many of these luxury artifacts, such as jade, obsidian and magnetite, came from distant locations and suggest thatearly Olmec elites had access to an extensive trading network in Mesoamerica. The source of the most valued jade, for example, isfound in the Motagua River valley in eastern Guatemala, and Olmec obsidian has been traced to sources in the Guatemala highlandssuch as El Chayal and San Martin Jilotepeque, or in Puebla, distances ranging from 200 to 400 km away (120 - 250 miles away)respectively.

La Venta

The first Olmec center, San Lorenzo, was all but abandoned around 900 BCE at about the same time that La Venta rose to prominence. A wholesale destruction of many San Lorenzo monuments also occurred circa 950 BCE, which may point to aninternal uprising or, less likely, an invasion. The latest thinking, however, is that environmental changes may have been responsiblefor this shift in Olmec centers, with certain important rivers changing course.

Following the decline of San Lorenzo, La Venta became the most prominent Olmec center, lasting from 900 BCE until itsabandonment around 400 BCE. La Venta sustained the Olmec cultural traditions, but with spectacular displays of power andwealth. The Great Pyramid was the largest Mesoamerican structure of its time. Even today, after 2500 years of erosion, it rises 34meters above the naturally flat landscape. Buried deep within La Venta, lay opulent, labor-intensive "Offerings": 1000 tons of smooth serpentine blocks, large mosaic pavements, and at least 48 separate deposits of polished jade celts, pottery, figurines, andhematite mirrors.

Decline

It is not known with any clarity what caused the eventual extinction of the Olmec culture. It is known that between 400 and 350BCE, population in the eastern half of the Olmec heartland dropped precipitously, and the area would remain sparsely inhabited untthe 19th century.

This depopulation was likely the result of "very serious environmental changes that rendered the region unsuited for large groups of farmers", in particular changes to the riverine environment that the Olmec depended upon for agriculture, for hunting and gathering,and for transportation. Archaeologists propose that these changes were triggered by tectonic upheavals or subsidence, or the siltingup of rivers due to agricultural practices.

One theory for the considerable population drop during the Terminal Formative period is suggested by Santley and colleagues(Santley et al. 1997) and proposes shifts in settlement location [relocation] due to volcanism instead of extinction. Volcaniceruptions during the Early, Late and Terminal Formative periods would have blanketed the lands and forced the Olmecs to move

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Venta

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Lorenzo_Tenochtitl%E2%80%A1n

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olmec_influences_on_Mesoamerican_cultures





their settlements.

Whatever the cause, within a few hundred years of the abandonment of the last Olmec cities, successor cultures had become firmlyestablished. The Tres Zapotes site, on the western edge of the Olmec heartland, continued to be occupied well past 400 BCE, butwithout the hallmarks of the Olmec culture. This post-Olmec culture, often labeled Epi-Olmec, has features similar to those found atIzapa, some 330 miles (550 km) to the southeast.

Art

Olmec artforms emphasize both monumental statuary and small jade carvings and jewelry. Much Olmec art is highly stylized anduses an iconography reflective of the religious meaning of the artworks. Some Olmec art, however, is surprisingly naturalistic,displaying an accuracy of depiction of human anatomy perhaps equaled in the Pre-Columbian New World only by the best MayaClassic era art.

Common motifs include downturned mouths and slit-like slanting eyes, both of which can be seen in most representations of "were- jaguars" or jaquar gods. The were-jaguar motif is characterized by almond-shaped eyes, a downturned open mouth, and a clefthead. The were-jaguar supernatural incorporates the were-jaguar motif as well as other features, although various academics definethe were-jaguar supernatural differently.

The most well-known aspect of shamanism in Mesoamerican religion, and in the whole of Native American shamanism, is the abilityto assume the powers of animals associated with the shaman. Such animals are called nahuales, and in Olmec art the most common

of these is the jaguar. In a sense, the optimal spirit would have the spirituality and intellect of man and the ferocity and strength of the jaguar, these are all combined in the shaman and his jaguar nahuale. The Jaguar Child may exemplify this combination. This is avery common representation in Olmec art, and it often includes the slitted eyes and curved mouth pronounced in this close-up.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olmec_were-jaguar





Olmec holds a half human-half jaguar baby.





Jade figure holding jaguar baby 1150-500 BC





The Olmec culture was first defined as an art style, and this continues to be the hallmark of the culture. Wrought in a large number omediums - jade, clay, basalt, and greenstone among others - much Olmec art, such as the Wrestler, is surprisingly naturalistic.

Other art, however, reveals fantastic anthropomorphic creatures, often highly stylized, using an iconography reflective of a religiousmeaning. Common motifs include downturned mouths and a cleft head, both of which are seen in representations of were-jaguars.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wrestler_(sculpture)





In addition to human subjects, Olmec artisans were adept at animal portrayals, for example, the ceramic ancient Olmec "BirdVessel", and "Fish Vessel" dating to circa 1000 BC. Ceramics are produced in kilns capable of exceeding approximately 900° C.

The only other prehistoric culture known to have achieved such high temperatures is that of Ancient Egypt. Bird Headed Beings.

Jade Face Masks

http://www.crystalinks.com/bird.html





Another type of artifact is much smaller; hardstone carvings in jade of a face in a mask form. Curators and scholars refer to "Olmec-style" face masks as despite being Olmec in style, to date no example has been recovered in a archaeologically controlled Olmeccontext. However they have been recovered from sites of other cultures, including one deliberately deposited in the ceremonial precinct of Tenochtitlan (Mexico City), which would presumably have been about 2,000 years old when the Aztecs buried it,suggesting these were valued and collected as Roman antiquities were in Europe.

Another Olmec Mask





The small figures in this scene have been restored to the original positions they had been found in at La Venta, Tabasco.

There is no definite answer for what this scene is enacting.

The men have elongated skulls, the result ofcranial deformation begun at an early age.

Olmec Figurines





A rare depiction of a female in Olmec art, this seated figure is also unusual for her hematite mirror ornament. Her seated pose and





mirror, an emblem of political and religious authority, convey her elite status. Mirrors functioned as divination tools, providingsymbolic access to other realms.

This article on the Olmec figurine describes a number of archetypical figurines produced by the Formative Period inhabitants of Mesoamerica. While many of these figurines may or may not have been produced directly by the people of the Olmec heartland,they bear the hallmarks and motifs of Olmec culture.

These figurines are usually found in household refuse, in ancient construction fill, and (outside the Olmec heartland) in graves,although many Olmec-style figurines, particularly those labelled as Las Bocas- or Xochipala-style, were recovered by looters and

are therefore without provenance.

The vast majority of figurines are simple in design, often nude or with a minimum of clothing, and made of local terracotta. Most of these recoveries are mere fragments: a head, arm, torso, or a leg. It is thought, based on wooden busts recovered from the water-logged El Manati site, that figurines were also carved from wood, but, if so, none have survived.

More durable and better known by the general public are those figurines carved, usually with a degree of skill, from jade,serpentine, greenstone, basalt, and other minerals and stones.

In March 2005, a team of archaeologists used NAA (neutron activation analysis) to compare over 1000 ancient MesoamericanOlmec-style ceramic artifacts with 275 samples of clay so as to "fingerprint" pottery origination. They found that "the Olmec packaged and exported their beliefs throughout the region in the form of specialized ceramic designs and forms, which quickly became hallmarks of elite status in various regions of ancient Mexico.

In August 2005 another study, this time using petrography, found that the "exchanges of vessels between highland and lowlandchiefly centers were reciprocal, or two way." Five of the samples dug up in San Lorenzo were "unambiguously" from Oaxaca.According to one of the archaeologists conducting the study, this "contradicts recent claims that the Gulf Coast was the sole sourceof pottery" in Mesoamerica.

The results of the INAA study were later defended in March 2006 in two articles in Latin American Antiquity. Because the INAAsample is much larger than the petrographic sample (a total of over 1600 analyses of raw materials and clays vs. approximately 20 pottery thin sections in the petrographic study), the authors of the Latin American Antiquity papers argue that the petrographic studycannot possibly overturn the INAA study.

Colossal Heads

While Olmec figurines are found abundantly in sites throughout the Formative Period, it is the stone monuments such as the colossalheads that are the most recognizable feature of Olmec culture. These monuments can be divided into four classes:

Colossal heads

Rectangular "altars" (more likely thrones)Free-standing in-the-round sculpture, such as the twins from El Azuzul or San Martin Pajapan Monument 1.Stelae, such as La Venta Monument 19 above. The stelae form was generally introduced later than the colossal heads, altarsor free-standing sculptures. Over time stelae moved from simple representation of figures, such as Monument 19 or La VentaStela 1, toward representations of historical events, particularly acts legitimizing rulers. This trend would culminate in post-Olmec monuments such as La Mojarra Stela 1, which combines images of rulers with script and calendar dates.

The most recognized aspect of the Olmec civilization are the enormous helmeted heads. As no known pre-Columbian text explainsthem, these impressive monuments have been the subject of much speculation. Once theorized to be ballplayers, it is now generallyaccepted that these heads are portraits of rulers, perhaps dressed as ballplayers. Infused with individuality, no two heads are alikeand the helmet-like headdresses are adorned with distinctive elements, suggesting to some personal or group symbols.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olmec_figurine





In 1939 a carving was discovered near the gigantic head with a characteristic Olmec design on one side and a date symbol on theother. This revealed a shocking truth: the Olmecs had a far greater right to be considered the mother culture. Hundreds of yearsearlier than anyone had imagined, simple villages had given way to a complex society governed by kings and priests, with impressiveceremonial centers and artworks. Today many find the term "mother culture" misleading, but clearly the Olmecs came first.

Other megalithic heads were discovered in the intervening years, all with African facial features. This is not necessarily to suggestthat the founders or leaders of Olmec civilization came directly from Africa, since many original populations of countries likeCambodia and the Philippines have similar characteristics. These might have been brought along when the first humans entered theAmericas from Asia.

Many Olmec heads had the symbol of the jaguar in different headpieces. The jaguar is a potent symbol that represents theMesoamerican cultures. The olmec used the shaman during a sacred ritual to transform into a jaguar. They believe that the jaguar was the living and the dead. Also they thought the olmec clearly imaged that their shamans transformed on ritual occasions into a perfect structure that was very important to them. They thought that was important for the gods, ritual, and myths.

There have been 17 colossal heads unearthed to date.

Site Count Designations

San Lorenzo 10 Colossal Heads 1 through 10

La Venta 4 Monuments 1 through 4

Tres Zapotes 2 Monuments A & QRancho la Cobata 1 Monument 1

The heads range in size from the Rancho La Cobata head, at 3.4 m high, to the pair at Tres Zapotes, at 1.47 m. It has beencalculated that the largest heads weigh between 25 and 55 short tons (50 t).

The heads were carved from single blocks or boulders of volcanic basalt, found in the Tuxtlas Mountains. The Tres Zapotes heads,for example, were sculpted from basalt found at the summit of Cerro el Vigia, at the western end of the Tuxtlas. The San Lorenzoand La Venta heads, on the other hand, were likely carved from the basalt of Cerro Cintepec, on the southeastern side, perhaps atthe nearby Llano del Jicaro workshop, and dragged or floated to their final destination dozens of miles away. It has been estimatedthat moving a colossal head required the efforts of 1,500 people for three to four months.

Some of the heads, and many other monuments, have been variously mutilated, buried and disinterred, reset in new locations and/orreburied. It is known that some monuments, and at least two heads, were recycled or recarved, but it is not known whether this wasimply due to the scarcity of stone or whether these actions had ritual or other connotations. It is also suspected that some mutilationhad significance beyond mere destruction, but some scholars still do not rule out internal conflicts or, less likely, invasion as a factor.

Almost all of these colossal heads bear the same features, flattened nose, wide lips, and capping headpiece, possible features of theOlmec warrior-kings. These characteristics have caused some debate due to their apparent resemblance to African facialcharacteristics. Based on this comparison, some have insisted that the Olmecs were Africans who had emigrated to the New WorldHowever, claims of pre-Columbian contacts with Africa are rejected by the vast majority of archeologists and other Mesoamericanscholars.

Explanations for the facial features of the colossal heads include the possibility that the heads were carved in this manner due to theshallow space allowed on the basalt boulders. Others note that in addition to the broad noses and thick lips, the heads have theAsian eye-fold, and that all these characteristics can still be found in modern Mesoamerican Indians. To support this, in the 1940sartist/art historian Miguel Covarrubias published a series of photos of Olmec artworks and of the faces of modern Mexican Indianswith very similar facial characteristics. In addition, the African origin hypothesis assumes that Olmec carving was intended to berealistic, an assumption that is hard to justify given the full corpus of representation in Olmec carving.

Olmec Heads

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rancho_la_Cobata

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tres_Zapotes

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Venta

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Lorenzo_Tenochtitl%E2%80%A1n





"The Grandmother", Monument 5 at La Venta

Monument 1, one of the four Olmec colossal heads atMuseo de Antropolog’a de Xalapa in Xalapa, Veracruz.





This head dates from 1200 to 900 BCEand is 2.9 meters high and 2.1 meters wide.





Monuments were also an important characteristic of Olmec centers. Today they provide us with some idea of the nature of Olmecideology. The colossal heads are commanding portraits of individual Olmec rulers, and the large symbol displayed on the 'helmet' ofeach colossal head appears to be an identification motif for that person. Colossal heads glorified the rulers while they were alive, andcommemorated them as revered ancestors after their death.

Altar at La Venta

Altar 5, La Venta. The inert were-jaguar baby held by the central figure is seen by some as an indication of child sacrifice.





In contrast, its sides show bas-reliefs of humans holding quite lively were-jaguar babies.





Altars were actually the thrones of Olmec rulers. The carving on the front of the throne shows the identified ruler sitting in a nichethat symbolizes a cave entrance to the supernatural powers of the underworld. That scene communicated to the people their ruler'sassociation with cosmological power

Notable Innovations

In addition to their influence with contemporaneous Mesoamerican cultures, as the first civilization in Mesoamerica, the Olmecs arecredited, or speculatively credited, with many "firsts", including the bloodletting and perhaps human sacrifice, writing and epigraphy,and the invention of zero and the Mesoamerican calendar, and the Mesoamerican ballgame, as well as perhaps the compass. Someresearchers, including artist and art historian Miguel Covarrubias, even postulate that the Olmecs formulated the forerunners of manyof the later Mesoamerican deities.

Bloodletting and Sacrifice

Although there is no explicit representation of Olmec bloodletting in the archaeological record, there is nonetheless a strong case thathe Olmecs ritually practiced it. Numerous natural and ceramic stingray spikes and maguey thorns, for example, have been found atOlmec sites, and certain artifacts have been identified as bloodletters.





The argument that the Olmecs instituted human sacrifice is significantly more speculative. No Olmec or Olmec-influenced sacrificialartifacts have yet been discovered and there is no Olmec or Olmec-influenced artwork that unambiguously shows sacrificial victims(similar, for example, to the danzante figures of Monte Alban) or scenes of human sacrifice (such as can be seen in the famous ballcourt mural from El Tajin).

However, at the El Manati site, disarticulated skulls and femurs as well as complete skeletons of newborn or unborn children have been discovered amidst the other offerings, leading to speculation concerning infant sacrifice. It is not yet known, though, how theinfants met their deaths. Some authors have also associated infant sacrifice with Olmec ritual art showing limp were-jaguar babies,most famously in La Venta's Altar 5 (to the left) or Las Limas figure. Any definitive answer will need to await further findings.





Religion and Mythology

Monument 19, from La Venta, the earliest known representation of

a feathered serpent in Mesoamerica.

It was formerly thought that the Olmec worshiped only one god, a rain deity depicted as a 'were-jaguar', but study has shown thatthere were at least 10 distinct gods represented in Olmec art. Present were several important deities of the later, established Meso-American pantheon, such as the fire god, rain god, corn/maize god, and the Feathered Serpent.

Olmec religious activities were performed by a combination of rulers, full-time priests, and shamans. The rulers seem to have beenthe most important religious figures, with their links to the Olmec deities or supernaturals providing legitimacy for their rule. There isalso considerable evidence for shamans in the Olmec archaeological record, particularly in the so-called "transformation figures".

Olmec mythology has left no documents comparable to the Popul Vuh from Maya mythology, and therefore any exposition of Olmec mythology must rely on interpretations of surviving monumental and portable art and comparisons with other Mesoamericanmythologies. Olmec art shows that such deities as the Feathered Serpent and a rain supernatural were already in the Mesoamerican pantheon in Olmec times.

The feathered serpent can be found throughout Mesoamerican Mythology - also known as Quetzalcoatl, Kukulcan, Viracocha,among other gods played by the same soul in various guises. Pyramids of Mesoamerica

Maize God, Man of Crops

http://www.crystalinks.com/pyramidmesoamerica.html

http://www.crystalinks.com/quetzalcoatl.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olmec_religion





Divinely sanctioned authority derived from the intimate relationship between maize agriculture and the rituals performed to ensure itsabundance. The earliest kings were portrayed wearing the regalia of the Maize God, embodying sacred power that guaranteedabundant crops. This richly dressed figure of an Olmec lord is one of the earliest such portrayals. Above his headband he wears thecleft mask of the Olmec Maize God.

The Man of Crops is a fertility figure in Mesoamerican mythology. Among the Olmec, gods are often depicted with a distinct clefton the forehead, perhaps identifying this characteristic as divine. A carved celt from Veracruz shows a representation of God II, or the Maize God, growing corn from his cleft, and also shows this god with the snarling face associated with the jaguar (Coe 1972:3).He was a human man or boy who chose to give his life so that his people might grow food. The heroic Man of Crops is sometimes

mentored or assisted by a god figure from the other world.

This king is dressed as the Maize God. He is seated cross-legged, in a rulership pose that goes back to the Olmec, and the foliated





sign around his mouth may designate him as a lord or ruler. He holds an open bundle in his hands.

This incised maskette reveals an Olmec-style face covered with scrolled patterns on the cheek and a maize icon in the center of theforehead. Maize was a potent symbol of wealth for the Olmec.

Jaquar God of the Underworld

Some people believe that the principal deity was fundamentally an Earth god, though his power was not limited to terrestrial mattersand took the form of a jaguar. This God could have a water-earth persona. As a jaguar encompassing the forces of life or at least a

dominance in its two strongest categories (with regards to Olmec life), water and earth. This deity supposedly had dominance over all things terrestrial and celestial. This God may have been half-jaguar, half-serpent, "were-jaguars". The jaguar represents the EarthMother with the serpent representing the water, thus combining to represent life.

Rain God





The Olmec image of the rain spirit appears frequently in the mythology of succeeding cultures. Invariably the rain spirit is male,though he may have a wife who shares authority over the waters. Often he is perceived as a child or a young man, sometimes as adwarf. He may also be portrayed as a powerful rain god, with many helpers.

In Aztec and Maya traditions, the rain lord is a master spirit, attended by several helpers. His name in the Aztec language is Tlaloc,and his helpers are "tlaloque." The Maya of the Yucatan recognize Chaac and the "chacs." In the Guatemalan area, these spirits areoften associated with gods of thunder and lightning as well as with rain. The rain spirits are known as Mam and the "mams" amongthe Mopan of Belize. In some traditions, as with the Pipil of El Salvador, the figure of the master is missing, and the myths focus on"rain children," or "rain boys." Modern Nahua consider these numerous spirits to be dwarfs, or "little people." In the state of Chiapas, the Zoque people report that the rain spirits are very old but look like boys.

The Olmecs are believed to be one of the first tribes to engage in Shamanistic rituals. The Olmec Tribe believed that the Jaquar wasa rain deity and fertility diety. The Jaquar was chosen because the Olmecs believed it was the most powerful and feared animal.They also believed that the Jaquar was an Avatar of the living and the dead. The men would sacrifice blood to the jaguar, wear masks, dance, and crack whips to imitate the sound of thunder. This ritual was done in May. The Olmec also made offerings of jade

figures to the jaguar. The Olmecs made numerous statues representing "Were, Jaquar " men. These men are normally shown withgrimacing Jaquar facial features with Human bodies. They are believed to be men , of the Olmec tribe, that are transforming into theJaquar. One of these transforming Shamans can be seen in the statue "Crouching figure of a Man-Jaquar".

It is an almost black, little figurine of a man rising from one knee in the ecstasy of transformation. The transformation figure showsthe human and feline characteristics brilliantly fused together. The head and ears remain human, but the crown of it's head is smoothas if shaved. The features of it's face seem to flow into each other and the eye sockets are wide and deeply bored. Extended byincised lines above the eyes, the carved eyebrows are similar to flame eyebrows and signify the shedding of skin.





In the figurine the 'Standing figure of a Were-Jaquar' another Shaman is seen in the transformation process . This figure stands withone leg forward to counterbalance the slight torsion of the body. The arms are extended and each hand is balled into a fist, similar toa boxing stance. This Figure has almost the exact same features as the 'Crouching Figure' that represent the ecstasy of thetransformation. Its hands and feet are oversized to anticipate the paws of the Jaquar.

In both figures the tortured facial features are intended to convey, not ferocity and aggressiveness, but emotional stress beyondendurance. It is precisely the sort of physically and mentally exhausting crisis, the crossing of the threshold between two worlds, tokinds of reality, if you will, that is part and practice of ecstatic Shamanism everywhere. The crossing over and transformation into themost powerful predator of the rain forest and the Savannah.

The Transformation was brought on by a series of activities which could incorporate singing or chanting to the Jaguar deity. TheShaman would dance around and chant a mantra to spirit world and would also use the rhythm of a beating. It is also believed thatthe Olmec would also ingest a 'mind altering' drug which would intoxicate the Shaman and make him dizzy Tobacco powder , whichwas also used to achieve the transformation could be inhaled directly through the nose or ground up with lime to make a chewingwad. The evidence to support this can be seen in the Hollow Figure in this statue a man is seen using a snuffing pipe made fromsmall gourds.

The "were-jaguar " Shamans were also associated and depicted in acrobatic poses, this represents the agility of the feline. Shamans

were believed to have the ability to flip backwards and transform before they had landed. There have been a number a figures found, that incorporate acrobatic poses. In the statues 'Figure with feet on head' and "vessel in the form of a contortionist". Shamans areshown in complex and complicated poses. The Shamans seems to very comfortable and achieve each pose with ease.





World Tree, Tree of Life

Olmec Glyph 900-500 BC: Dallas Museum

About 3,000 years ago, elders and leaders in farming communities of Mesoamerica established a shared vision of their world. Thessages of Olmec civilization etched their creed on polished stone artifacts and then rubbed red paint into the patterns. This is a codethat could be read by any sage who knew the religion. This plaque reords the story of creation. It shows the World Tree sproutingout of Creation Mountain at the Three-Stone-Place the center of the night sky, the renewed sky, the mountian and the renewed

earth, and the Three-Stone-Place the hearth, the place of First Father's rebirth as Maize.

Stela from Izapa, the Olmec recognized the Tree of Life.





It confirms the tradition recorded by:

Friar Diego de Landa that the Olmec people made twelve migrations to the New World.Famous Mayan historian Ixtlixochitl, that the Olmec came to Mexico in "ships of barks " and landed at Pontochan, which theycommenced to populate

These Blacks are frequently depicted in the Mayan books/writings carrying trade goods. The tree depicts seven branches andtwelve roots. The seven branches probably represent the seven major clans of the Olmec people. The twelve roots extending intothe water from the boat probably signifies the "twelve roads through the sea", mentioned by Friar Diego Landa.

Another Version of the Tree of Life





The Eye of Creation and the Snake or Human DNA

Writing

The Olmec may have been the first civilization in the Western Hemisphere to develop a writing system. Symbols found in 2002 and2006 date to 650 BCE and 900 BCE respectively, preceding the oldest Zapotec writing dated to about 500 BCE.

The 2002 find at the San Andres site shows a bird, speech scrolls, and glyphs that are similar to the later Mayan hieroglyphs.Known as the Cascajal Block, the 2006 find from a site near San Lorenzo, shows a set of 62 symbols, 28 of which are unique,carved on a serpentine block. A large number of prominent archaeologists have hailed this find as the "earliest pre-Columbianwriting". Others are skeptical because of the stone's singularity, the fact that it had been removed from any archaeological context,and because it bears no apparent resemblance to any other Mesoamerican writing system.

There are also well-documented later hieroglyphs known as "Epi-Olmec," and while there are some who believe that Epi-Olmecmay represent a transitional script between an earlier Olmec writing system and Mayan writing, the matter remains unsettled.

Mesoamerican Long Count Calendar and Invention of the Zero Concept

The Olmecs were clever mathematicians and astronomers who made accurate calendars.

The back of Stela C from Tres Zapotes

http://www.crystalinks.com/eye.html





This is the second oldest Long Count date yet discovered. The numerals 7.16.6.16.18 translate to September 3, 32 BCE (Julian).

The glyphs surrounding the date are one of the few surviving examples of Epi-Olmec script. This is one of the earliest uses of thezero concept in history.

The Long Count calendar used by many subsequent Mesoamerican civilizations, as well as the concept of zero, may have beendevised by the Olmecs. Because the six artifacts with the earliest Long Count calendar dates were all discovered outside theimmediate Maya homeland, it is likely that this calendar predated the Maya and was possibly the invention of the Olmecs. Three of these six artifacts were found within the Olmec heartland. But an argument against an Olmec origin is the fact that the Olmeccivilization had ended by the 4th century BCE, several centuries before the earliest known Long Count date artifact.

The Epi-Olmec who unhabited the same land, and were probably descended at least in part from the Olmec, seem to have been theearliest users of the 'bar and dot' system of recording time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesoamerican_Long_Count_calendar





Detail of Long Count Date

The low relief on this stone shows the detail from a four-digit numerical recording, read as 15.6.16.18. The vigesimal (or base-20)counting system has been used across Mesoamerica. A value of 5 is represented by a bar, and a value of 1 is represented by a dot,such that the three bars and single dot here stands for 16. The Maya would later adopt this counting system for their Long Countcalendar.

Mesoamerican Ballgame

The Olmec, whose name means "rubber people" in the Nahuatl language of the Aztecs , are strong candidates for originating theMesoamerican ballgame so prevalent among later cultures of the region and used for recreational and religious purposes. A dozenrubber balls dating to 1600 BCE or earlier have been found in El Manati, an Olmec sacrificial bog 10 kilometres east of SanLorenzo Tenochtitlan. These balls predate the earliest ballcourt yet discovered at Paso de la Amada, circa 1400 BCE, althoughthere is no certainty that they were used in the ballgame.

Ethnicity and Language

While the actual ethno-linguistic affiliation of the Olmec remain unknown, various hypotheses have been put forward. For example,in 1968 Michael D. Coe speculated that the Olmec were Mayan predecessors.

In 1976 linguists Lyle Campbell and Terrence Kaufman published a paper in which they argued a core number of loanwords hadapparently spread from a Mixe-Zoquean language into many other Mesoamerican languages.

Campbell and Kaufman proposed that the presence of these core loanwords indicated that the Olmec generally regarded as the first"highly civilized" Mesoamerican society - spoke a language ancestral to Mixe-Zoquean. The spread of this vocabulary particular totheir culture accompanied the diffusion of other Olmec cultural and artistic traits that appears in the archaeological record of other Mesoamerican societies.

Mixe-Zoque specialist Soren Wichmann first critiqued this theory on the basis that most of the Mixe-Zoquean loans seemed tooriginate from the Zoquean branch of the family only. This implied the loanword transmission occurred in the period after the two branches of the language family split, placing the time of the borrowings outside of the Olmec period. However new evidence has pushed back the proposed date for the split of Mixean and Zoquean languages to a period within the Olmec era.

Based on this dating, the architectural and archaeological patterns and the particulars of the vocabulary loaned to other

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesoamerican_languages

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesoamerican_ballgame

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nahuatl





Mesoamerican languages from Mixe-Zoquean, Wichmann now suggests that the Olmecs of San Lorenzo spoke proto-Mixe and theOlmecs of La Venta spoke proto-Zoque.

At least the fact that the Mixe-Zoquean languages still are, and are historically known to have been, spoken in an areacorresponding roughly to the Olmec heartland, leads most scholars to assume that the Olmec spoke one or more Mixe-Zoqueanlanguages.

Social and Political Organization

Little is directly known about the societal or political structure of Olmec society. Although it is assumed by most researchers that thecolossal heads and several other sculptures represent rulers, nothing has been found like the Maya stelae which name specific rulersand provide the dates of their rule.

Instead, archaeologists relied on the data that they had, such as large- and small-scale site surveys. These provided evidence of considerable centralization within the Olmec region, first at San Lorenzo and then at La Venta - no other Olmec sites come close tothese in terms of area or in the quantity and quality of architecture and sculpture.

This evidence of geographic and demographic centralization leads archaeologists to propose that Olmec society itself was





hierarchial, concentrated first at San Lorenzo and then at La Venta, with an elite that was able to use their control over materialssuch as water and monumental stone to exert command and legitimize their regime.

Nonetheless, Olmec society is thought to lack many of the institutions of later civilizations, such as a standing army or priestly caste.And there is no evidence that San Lorenzo or La Venta controlled, even during their heyday, all of the Olmec heartland. There issome doubt, for example, that La Venta controlled even Arroyo Sonso, only some 35 km away. Studies of the Tuxtla Mountainsettlements, some 60 km away, indicate that this area was composed of more or less egalitarian communities outside the control of lowland centers.

Trade

The wide diffusion of Olmec artifacts and "Olmecoid" iconography throughout much of Mesoamerica indicates the existence of extensive long-distance trade networks. Exotic, prestigious and high-value materials such as greenstone and marine shell weremoved in significant quantities across large distances. While the Olmec were not the first in Mesoamerica to organise long-distanceexchanges of goods, the Olmec period saw a significant expansion in interregional trade routes, more variety in material goods

exchanged and a greater diversity in the sources from which the base materials were obtained.

Village Life and Diet

Despite their size, San Lorenzo and La Venta were largely ceremonial centers, and the majority of the Olmec lived in villages similarto present-day villages and hamlets in Tabasco and Veracruz.

These villages were located on higher ground and consisted of several scattered houses. A modest temple may have beenassociated with the larger villages. The individual dwellings would consist of a house, an associated lean-to, and one or more storag pits (similar in function to a root cellar). A nearby garden was used for medicinal and cooking herbs and for smaller crops such asthe domesticated sunflower. Fruit trees, such as avocado or cacao, were likely available nearby.

Although the river banks were used to plant crops between flooding periods, the Olmecs also likely practiced swidden (or slash-and-burn) agriculture to clear the forests and shrubs, and to provide new fields once the old fields were exhausted.

Fields were located outside the village, and were used for maize, beans, squash, manioc, sweet potato, as well as cotton. Based onarchaeological studies of two villages in the Tuxtlas Mountains, it is known that maize cultivation became increasingly important tothe Olmec over time, although the diet remained fairly diverse.

The fruits and vegetables were supplemented with fish, turtle, snake, and mollusks from the nearby rivers, and crabs and shellfish inthe coastal areas. Birds were available as food sources, as were game including peccary, opossum, raccoon, rabbit, and in particular deer. Despite the wide range of hunting and fishing available, midden surveys in San Lorenzo have found that thedomesticated dog was the single most plentiful source of animal protein.

Etymology





The name "Olmec" means "rubber people" in Nahuatl, the language of the Aztec, and was the Aztec name for the people who livedin the Gulf Lowlands in the 15th and 16th centuries, some 2000 years after the Olmec culture died out. The term "rubber people"refers to the ancient practice, spanning from ancient Olmecs to Aztecs, of extracting latex from Castilla elastica, a rubber tree in thearea. The juice of a local vine, Ipomoea alba, was then mixed with this latex to create rubber as early as 1600 BCE.

Early modern explorers and archaeologists, however, mistakenly applied the name "Olmec" to the rediscovered ruins and artifacts inthe heartland decades before it was understood that these were not created by people the Aztecs knew as the "Olmec", but rather aculture that was 2000 years older. Despite the mistaken identity, the name has stuck.

It is not known what name the ancient Olmec used for themselves; some later Mesoamerican accounts seem to refer to the ancientOlmec as "Tamoanchan". A contemporary term sometimes used to describe the Olmec culture is tenocelome, meaning "mouth of the jaguar".

History of Scholarly Research

Olmec culture was unknown to historians until the mid-19th century. In 1869 the Mexican antiquarian traveller JosŽ Melgar ySerrano published a description of the first Olmec monument to have been found in situ. This monument - the colossal head nowlabelled Tres Zapotes Monument A - had been discovered in the late 1850s by a farm worker clearing forested land on a haciendain Veracruz.

Hearing about the curious find while traveling through the region, Melgar y Serrano first visited the site in 1862 to see for himself andcomplete partially exposed sculpture's excavation. His description of the object, published several years later after further visits tothe site, represents the earliest documented report of an artifact of what is now known as the Olmec culture.

In the latter half of the 19th century, Olmec artifacts such as the Kunz Axe (right) came to light and were subsequently recognized as belonging to a unique artistic tradition.

Frans Blom and Oliver La Farge made the first detailed descriptions of La Venta and San Martin Pajapan Monument 1 during their 1925 expedition. However, at this time most archaeologists assumed the Olmec were contemporaneous with the Maya - even Blomand La Farge were, in their own words, "inclined to ascribe them to the Maya culture".

Matthew Stirling of the Smithsonian Institution conducted the first detailed scientific excavations of Olmec sites in the 1930s and1940s. Stirling, along with art historian Miguel Covarrubias, became convinced that the Olmec predated most other knownMesoamerican civilizations.

In counterpoint to Stirling, Covarrubias, and Alfonso Caso, however, Mayanists Eric Thompson and Sylvanus Morley argued for Classic-era dates for the Olmec artifacts. The question of Olmec chronology came to a head at a 1942 Tuxtla Gutierrez conferencewhere Alfonso Caso declared that the Olmecs were the "mother culture" ("cultura madre") of Mesoamerica.

Shortly after the conference, radiocarbon dating proved the antiquity of the Olmec civilization, although the "mother culture" questiongenerates much debate even 60 years later.

Olmecs in the News ...





"Spectacular" Three-Cat Monolith Unearthed in Mexico National Geographic - August 2, 2011

Giant carving may have been part of a monumental wall crawling with felines. With a little help from archaeologists, three giant catshave slunk into view after spending thousands of years underground in central Mexico. Carved in a vaguely Olmec style into a stonemonolith, the seated jaguars - or possibly mountain lions - may have been part of a decorative hillside wall that was crawling with big-cat carvings, experts suggest. The circa 700 B.C. carving, dubbed the "Triad of Felines" by archaeologists, was found about 60miles (a hundred kilometers) south of Mexico City at Chalcatzingo, an archaeological site known to have had ties to the Olmeccivilization. Measuring about 5 feet (1.5 meters) tall and 3.6 feet (1.1 meters) wide, the carving was originally set within a hillsideand was designed to be clearly visible from a village below, experts say. The discovery is only the latest of about 40 large stonecarvings found at Chalcatzingo since 1935 - many of them depicting cats, said David Grove, an anthropologist at the University of Florida who conducted research at Chalcatzingo for 30 years beginning in the 1970s.

Ancient Mesoamerican sculpture uncovered in southern Mexico. PhysOrg - February 14, 2011

This photo and drawing illustrate a recently discovered 3,000-year-old Olmec-style stone monument from Ojo de Agua, thesite of an early planned settlement in what is now the southern Mexican state of Chiapas. The carved monument providesinformation about Olmec culture in the area and includes symbols of maize, deities or other important figures, and possiblefeatures of the natural world. With one arm raised and a determined scowl, the figure looks ready to march right off hiscarved tablet and into the history books. If only we knew who he was - corn god? Tribal chief? Sacred priest?

Pictures: Pyramid Tomb With Human Sacrifices Found National Geographic - November 18, 2010

Archaeologist Lynneth Lowe and a worker clean the skull of an elite individual found in a tomb atop a three-story-tall

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/05/photogalleries/100518-oldest-pyramid-tomb-zoque-mexico-science-pictures/

http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-02-ancient-mesoamerican-sculpture-uncovered-southern.html

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/08/110801-three-cat-carving-felines-triad-olmec-mexico-science/





pyramid in Chiapa de Corzo (map), Mexico. The 2,700-year-old site is the oldest known pyramid tomb in Mesoamerica,which roughly encompasses modern-day Mexico and Central America, according to archaeologists who announced thediscovery today. The pyramid is a window into how and when the unique culture called the Zoque emerged from the Olmec,one of the oldest civilizations in the New World, said excavation leader Bruce Bachand. The Olmec began fanning out fromtheir Gulf of Mexico homeland around 1200 B.C. The culture influenced many Mesoamerican civilizations to come - althoughto what extent is a long-standing debate among archaeologists.

Mexico's oldest pyramid tomb found MSNBC - May 19, 2010Archaeologists in southern Mexico say they have discovered a 2,700-year-old tomb of a dignitary inside a pyramid that may be the

oldest such burial documented in Mesoamerica. The tomb held a man aged around 50, who was buried with jade collars, pyrite andobsidian artifacts and ceramic vessels. Archaeologist Emiliano Gallaga said the tomb dates to between 500 and 700 B.C.

Pyramid Tomb With Human Sacrifices Found National Geographic - May 19, 2010

Archaeologist Lynneth Lowe and a worker clean the skull of an elite individual found in a tomb atop a three-story-tall pyramid inChiapa de Corzo (map), Mexico. The 2,700-year-old site is the oldest known pyramid tomb in Mesoamerica, which roughlyencompasses modern-day Mexico and Central America, according to archaeologists who announced the discovery today.

Ancient City Found in Mexico; Shows Olmec Influence National Geographic, January 26, 2007

A 2,500-year-old city influenced by the Olmecs often referred to as the Mother Culture of Mesoamerica has been

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/01/070126-mexico-olmec.html

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/05/photogalleries/100518-oldest-pyramid-tomb-zoque-mexico-science-pictures/#mexico-tomb-jade-bachand-cleaning-skeleton_20359_600x450.jpg

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37212529/ns/technology_and_science-science/





discovered hundreds of miles away from the Olmecs' Gulf coast territory, archaeologists said. Located about 25 miles (40kilometers) south of Mexico City, the ruins, called Zazacatla, are hundreds of miles from the Gulf of Mexico coast regiongenerally associated with the Olmec.

Mexico monolith may cast new light on Mesoamerica CNN - May 8, 2006, Mexico City

A carved monolith unearthed in Mexico may show that the Olmec civilization, one of the oldest in the Americas, was morewidespread than thought or that another culture thrived alongside it 3,000 years ago. Findings at the newly excavated Tamtocarcheological site in the north-central state of San Luis Potosi may prompt scholars to rethink a view of Mesoamericanhistory which holds that its earliest peoples were based in the south of Mexico. "It is a very relevant indicator of an Olmec penetration far to the north, or of the presence of a new group co-existing with the Olmecs," said archeologist GuillermoAhuja, who led a government team excavating the site for the past five years. Tamtoc, located about 550 miles (885kilometers) northeast of Mexico City, will open to the public this week, while experts including linguists, historians,ethnographers and others study findings from the site to confirm their origins.

The Olmecs are considered the mother culture of pre-Hispanic Mexico. Ruins of Olmec centers believed to have flourished

as early as 1200 B.C. have been found in the Gulf Coast states of Veracruz and Tabasco, with only scattered artifacts foundelsewhere. Workers restoring a canal at the site stumbled on the stone monolith. It appears to represent a lunar calendar andcontains three human figures and other symbols in relief. "At 25 feet (7.6 meters) long, 13 feet (4 meters) high, 16 inches (40centimeters) thick and weighing more than 30 tonnes, it may date to as early as 900 BC," Ahuja said. Experts will try tointerpret the icons to learn more about the artists and their culture. "They are new symbols in Mesoamerica. At Tamtoc,scientists found evidence of an advanced civilization, with a hydraulic system, canals and other technology, making it theoldest and most advanced center of its time found in what later became Huasteco Indian region," Ahuja said. "It is the firstand only Huasteco City we know. The 330-acre (133-hectare) complex has three plazas and more than 70 buildings andmay indicate that the Olmecs migrated northward and mingled with other peoples there."

Earliest New World writing revealed, Olmec New Scientist- December 21, 2002

The discovery of a fist-sized ceramic cylinder and fragments of engraved plaques has pushed back the earliest evidence of writing in the Americas by at least 350 years to 650 BC. Rolling the cylinder printed symbols indicating allegiance to a king, a





striking difference from the Old World, where the oldest known writing was used for keeping records by the firstaccountants. Archaeologists uncovered the cylinder and fingernail-sized fragments among debris from an ancient festival atSan Andres, an Olmec town on the coastal plain of the Mexican state of Tabasco. Carbon dating of layers in the rubbishheap gave age of the artefacts.

The next-oldest writing from the region is on a monument at a site of the Zapotec culture 300 kilometres to the west. But itsdate is poorly constrained, to sometime between 300 BC and 200 AD. Three later cultures in the same area used similar writing, the well-known Mayan, and the lesser-known Isthmain and Oxacan. The cylinder shows two glyphs linked by linesto the mouth of a bird, giving the impression the glyphs are being spoken. One is "ajaw," meaning "king," and the other "three

ajaw", a day in the sacred 260-day calendar used throughout the region for over a millennium. Later cultures used similar lineto show speech by people as well as by animals. When covered with ink or paint, the roller printed the bird and symbols oncloth or people's bodies. The date probably was the king's name, a common practice at the time."It's a kind of royal seal,used in decoration," Mary Pohl, an anthropologist at Florida State University in Tallahassee, told New Scientist. People inSan Andres probably wore it "to show their fealty to the king" who resided at the main Olmec city of La Venta nearby.

The Olmec were the first American culture with a distinct ruling class, and Pohl believes they developed writing for rituals andrulers. Later Mesoamerican writing retained the links to kings and rituals, including the sacred calendar. Pohl says that writingcould have originated at the start of the first Olmec culture in 1300 BC, but no evidence has survived. In contrast, Old Worldwriting is far older and traces back to tokens placed in clay envelopes to keep account of animals or other possessions. Byabout 3000 BC, symbols written on tablets replaced the tokens, becoming the world's first writing.

Scientists Solve Jade Source Mystery - June 2002, World Scientist

Since the 18th century, collectors, geologists and archaeologists have sought the answer to a frustrating mystery: The ancientOlmecs fashioned statues out of striking blue-green jade, but the stone itself was nowhere to be found in the Americas. Nowscientists believe they have discovered the source, a mother lode of jade in Guatemala that could tell much about ancientAmerican civilizations and about the formation of the continent where they lived. Ever since Alexander von Humboldt begancollecting jade in Latin America in the 18th century, Olmec-style statuettes and axes, crafted more than two millennia ago,had been found from Mexico to Costa Rica. But never had that kind of jade been seen naturally in any quantity in the area.Then in 1999, Russell Seitz, a geophysicist who had spent 23 years searching for the source of Olmec jade, took his fiancee

to the colonial city of Antigua in central Guatemala. On the roof of a store, he found jade that was vastly different from theopaque jade he had seen in Mexico and Central America, and it was identical to the translucent blue-green stones so coveted by the Olmecs, who lived in central and southern Mexico from 1000-400 B.C.

MESOAMERICA INDEX

STONE FACES INDEX

ANCIENT AND LOST CIVILIZATIONS

PYRAMIDS OF MES0AMERICA

ALPHABETICAL INDEX OF ALL FILES

http://www.crystalinks.com/directory2.html

http://www.crystalinks.com/pyramidmesoamerica.html

http://www.crystalinks.com/ancient.html

http://www.crystalinks.com/stonefaces.html

http://www.crystalinks.com/mesoamerica.html




CRYSTALINKS HOME PAGE

PSYCHIC READING WITH ELLIE

Search

http://www.crystalinks.com/advertise_crystalinks.html

http://www.crystalinks.com/reading.html

http://www.crystalinks.com/index.html

olmec crystalink

Documents