old versus new aristocrat/capitalist conservative /reformer seven gables/ traveler hepzibah/ phoebe...

10

Upload: virgil-waters

Post on 18-Jan-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Old versus New Aristocrat/Capitalist Conservative /Reformer Seven Gables/ Traveler Hepzibah/ Phoebe Painter/ daguerreotypist

TRANSCRIPT

Page 3: Old versus New Aristocrat/Capitalist Conservative /Reformer Seven Gables/ Traveler Hepzibah/ Phoebe Painter/ daguerreotypist

Old versus New

• Aristocrat/Capitalist• Conservative

/Reformer• Seven Gables/

Traveler• Hepzibah/ Phoebe• Painter/

daguerreotypist

Page 4: Old versus New Aristocrat/Capitalist Conservative /Reformer Seven Gables/ Traveler Hepzibah/ Phoebe Painter/ daguerreotypist

Inventions in Seven Gables• Mesmerism• Electricity• Locomotive• Omnibus• Daguerreotype• Organ Grinder• Balloon frame

architecture• Telegraph

Page 5: Old versus New Aristocrat/Capitalist Conservative /Reformer Seven Gables/ Traveler Hepzibah/ Phoebe Painter/ daguerreotypist

Mesmerism

Page 6: Old versus New Aristocrat/Capitalist Conservative /Reformer Seven Gables/ Traveler Hepzibah/ Phoebe Painter/ daguerreotypist

Fourierism• Fourier, more than any other utopian socialist, tried to solve all the problems of society by the construction of an

elaborately detailed system in which every person, activity, and thing had its place, and every contingency was anticipated. He believed that the completely free development of man and the unrestrained indulgence of all desires and appetites would necessarily produce the good man in the good society, and that vice and evil were results of restraints upon freedom for complete self-gratification — the most extreme form of social optimism. Man was naturally good because he bore within himself a fundamental moral harmony, the reflection of harmony in the universe. His “natural man” was considerably more natural than Jean Jacques Rousseau’s, but he proposed to liberate him by means of a most rigidly organized society. Of course, the assumption was that once a sample community of this society, which only Fourier knew how to construct, was set up, it would prove so immensely attractive that it would be adopted universally within a very short time.

• Society was to be divided into phalanges, or as they were usually called in America, phalansteries or phalanxes, each with a common building, housing from sixteen hundred to eighteen hundred individuals on about three square miles of agricultural land, divided into fields, orchards, and gardens — Fourier was very fond of fruits and flowers. The population would be divided into groups of at least seven persons, with two in each wing, representing both the ascending and descending streams of taste and ability, and three in the center for balance. At least five groups would form a series, again with a center and wings. There would be a series for every conceivable occupation, and the members could move freely from one to another. Each person might work no more than an hour or two in any one series, so that all would find complete fulfillment. Unpleasant work like garbage removal would be performed by junior battalions of children, who would be encouraged to find tasks like cleaning privies great fun. Each family would have a separate apartment in the phalanstery, which would also have a center and two wings, and there would be theatres, concert halls, libraries, community dining rooms, counsel chambers, schools, nurseries, and all public amenities. The fourth side of the square would be closed by the barns, warehouses, and workshops, and on the center plaza the groups would be mustered each morning and marched to their work with music playing and banners flying. The phalanx would be financed by the sale of shares of stock, but every member need not be a stockholder, nor every stockholder a member. Work would be paid for and the worker would be charged rent and other expenses. At the end of the year the profits of the phalanx would be divided, five-twelfths to labor, four-twelfths to capital and three-twelfths to skill. Seven-eighths of the members would be farmers and mechanics, and the rest professionals, artists, scientists, and capitalists. There would be no discontent or discrimination, since all roles would be interchangeable. There would be a Chancellery of the Court of Love, and Corporations of Love, and an extraordinary system of organized polygamy. Not only sex, but food and all other sensual pleasures, would be organized to give maximum pleasure.

Page 7: Old versus New Aristocrat/Capitalist Conservative /Reformer Seven Gables/ Traveler Hepzibah/ Phoebe Painter/ daguerreotypist

Telegraph

Page 8: Old versus New Aristocrat/Capitalist Conservative /Reformer Seven Gables/ Traveler Hepzibah/ Phoebe Painter/ daguerreotypist

Jim Crow

Page 9: Old versus New Aristocrat/Capitalist Conservative /Reformer Seven Gables/ Traveler Hepzibah/ Phoebe Painter/ daguerreotypist

Class Structures

• Matthew Maule and Colonel Pyncheon

• Matthew Maule III and Mr. Pyncheon

• Holgrave and Hepzibah

Page 10: Old versus New Aristocrat/Capitalist Conservative /Reformer Seven Gables/ Traveler Hepzibah/ Phoebe Painter/ daguerreotypist

Foreigners