ofi24feb2009

Upload: opalesque-publications

Post on 05-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 OFI24Feb2009

    1/16

    Copyright 2009 Opalesque Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

    SECTION NAME

    Why Did People ShunManaged Futures?A veteran investor I know used to talk about how he controlled the riskin the fund of hedge funds he managed. He invested in as many as 100

    hedge funds at a time, across a wide range of strategies and styles.

    Managed futures was not among those. It was possibly the only hedge

    fund sector he avoided on principle.

    Were talking about a seasoned pro. After several decades of

    experience, he had developed his own diversication tactics and

    analytical devices. The latter gave advance warning of rising correlation

    among strategies so that the allocations could be changed to keep the

    portfolio diversied and losses at a minimumor so his robust track

    record suggested.

    The credit crisis was not kind to my friend. While fund of funds generallylost less than 20% in 2008, the loss in one of his pools was more than

    double that. Part of the reason was that the portfolio was levered,

    which magnied the losses made by the underlying funds. Another

    reason emerged last month. He had a long-standing allocation to

    Bernard Madoff. It was not a big part of his fund, but still large enough

    to add a signicant amount of red ink.

    Heres a knowledgeable person who gave money to Madoff, about

    whom there were doubts for many years, but avoided managed futures

    as too risky. What is it about managed futures that turns off investors?

    Does it carry special risks not found in other strategies? How do long-

    time managers control the risks? This issue explores those questions.

    AHL, part of Man Group, is one of the largest and longest-runningfutures trading programs. Tim Wong, chief executive of AHL, tells us

    how they keep improving the system. Jon Knudsen of Tapestry Asset

    Management presents the investors point of view, explaining whats

    attractive about managed futures, whats not and what to watch for

    when investing.

    Cont. on page 2

    In This Issue

    Founding Father Q&ATim Wong, Chief Executive of ManGroups AHL, talks about howthe firm continues to improve itstrading approach...........................3

    News BriefsManaged Futures Shareof Industry Assets ........................5

    Insider TalkSeasoned hedge fund investorJon Knudsen, co-chief investmentofficer of Tapestry, discusses whathe looks for in CTAs ................... .7

    Futures LabLearn about ways to control therisks associated with managedfutures .........................................9

    Manager Profiles

    Up-and-coming managerscomment on their strategy andthe markets. ..............................12

    Regulators & CourtsFutures-related fraud casescontinue to pile up .....................14

    Top TenThe most recent ranking fromAutumn Gold .............................15

    ISSUE 2 24 FEBRUARY, 2009

  • 8/2/2019 OFI24Feb2009

    2/16

    Copyright 2009 Opalesque Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

    2

    ISSUE 2 24 FEBRUARY, 2009

    opalesque.com

    OPALESQUE FUTURES

    EDITORIAL

    Notwithstanding the complexities of investing in the strategy, managed futures assets

    have grown rapidly in the past 10 years and especially after 2002, as the graph below

    shows. Last year the hedge fund industry as a whole shrank substantially due to acombination of heavy losses and redemptions. By contrast, managed futures had double-

    digit gains and assets were at.

    Since other hedge funds contracted while managed futures remained stable, the latter

    now account for a signicantly larger share of the industry. For details, see News Briefs.

    To say that were living in difcult and uncertain economic times is an understatement.

    Under these conditions an accurate appreciation of the risks and benets of managed

    futures may be more important than ever for successful investing. We hope this issue

    contributes to a realistic view.

    Chidem Kurdas

    Editor

    [email protected]

    Source:BarclayHedge

  • 8/2/2019 OFI24Feb2009

    3/16

    Copyright 2009 Opalesque Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

    3

    ISSUE 2 24 FEBRUARY, 2009

    opalesque.com

    OPALESQUE FUTURES

    Opalesque Futures Intelligence: How did you move

    into futures from engineering?

    Tim Wong: I stumbled into managed futures quite

    by chance. My main interests have always been

    the sciences, and I originally wanted to become

    an engineer after I completed my degree. Having

    been brought up in Hong Kong I was mildly aware

    of the nancial markets, but I never aimed to be the

    investment banker type. After I graduated I applied

    for a few nancial positions alongside a number of

    engineering opportunities. I was lucky to have found

    AHL, which allowed me to combine my love ofscience with the study of the nancial markets.

    OFI: Whats interesting about this market?

    TW: Futures markets are often viewed as more

    complicated and risky than stock or bond markets.

    In my view, this is more due to the misuse of the

    inherent leverage of futures through margining and

    the unfamiliarity with managing short positions.

    Futures allow investors to express their bullish or

    bearish views of markets simply by going long or

    short, respectively. In addition, trading is carried

    out on a regulated exchange, which provides price

    transparency, centralized clearing and liquidity.

    Unlike equities or bonds there are no dividends

    or coupons, which is perfect for trading strategies

    based on forecasting market directions across a

    diverse pool of markets.

    OFI: Why did AHL do so well in 2008, a very difcult

    year for almost all other investments?

    TW: If you look at the performance of our

    Diversied fund in 2008, what you see is that

    all sectors traded contributed positively to

    performance. Energies were the stand-out

    performer, with long and then short oil positions

    later in the year driving returns. Currency trading

    was also extremely protable, with long US dollar

    FOUNDING FATHER Q&A

    Research as Strategy Mainstay

    Tim Wong, chief executive of AHL, provides insight into the performance of

    managed futures. He began his career doing statistical research in nancial

    markets with AHL after nishing an engineering degree at Oxford University.

    He has developed systematic trading models at AHL for over 18 years, during

    which time he contributed to AHL becoming one of the worlds largest and

    most successful managed futures managers, currently with $24.4 billion under

    management. AHL, part of Man Group, returned over 30% in its agship

    Diversied program in 2008.

    Mr. Wong sees AHLs research ethic and commitment to research as the key driver

    behind its success. This has resulted in Man Group, along with AHL, establishing

    a collaborative relationship with Oxford University through the creation of the

    Oxford-Man Institute of Quantitative Finance. AHL has a research laboratory

    located on the same premises as the Institute, with high performance computing

    and micro-structure modeling among the areas being researched. It is planned

    that this laboratory within Oxford University will play a key part in driving AHLs

    research efforts in 2009 and beyond.

  • 8/2/2019 OFI24Feb2009

    4/16

    Copyright 2009 Opalesque Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

    4

    ISSUE 2 24 FEBRUARY, 2009

    opalesque.com

    OPALESQUE FUTURES

    FOUNDING FATHER Q&A

    positions adding to performance in the nal

    quarter.

    While on face value this sounds good, itmust be acknowledged that 2008 was an

    extremely challenging year for the nancial

    markets. We saw volatility increase substantially

    throughout the course of the year, while

    at the same time counterparty exposure

    became a key focal point. Our robust and

    adaptive risk management systems, diverse

    trading relationships and advanced electronic

    trading platform ensured that we were able

    to successfully navigate our way through the

    challenging year that was 2008.

    OFI: Which markets offer promising trading

    opportunities this year?

    TW: From my experience, one important thing

    that I have learnt is that it is difcult to predict

    which markets are going to perform over the

    next year, let alone over the following few

    months. If you look back at sector attribution

    of our Diversied program over the past ve

    years, what you see is that markets and sectors

    do not perform consistently over time. For

    example, energy trading led performance in

    2008 however in 2006 it actually generated a

    loss. By taking a highly diversied approach, by

    both sector and market, you have the potentialto prot from trends developing in only a

    handful of markets.

    Concentrating on the year ahead, economic

    uncertainty will continue to have a dominant

    impact on market performance, just like in

    2008. Based on our past experience, we are

    condent that, given clear trends, AHL will

    continue to perform well. However, given the

    current high volatility environment, it must be

    emphasized that risk management will continue

    to play an important role in AHLs day-to-day

    operations.

    OFI: Whats the main advantage of managed

    futures over other investments?

    TW: 2008 really highlighted the benets of

    managed futures, especially as a complement

    to traditional investments or even other

    hedge fund strategies. With global equity

    markets falling 40% over the last calendar year,

    managed futures really proved that they can

    provide absolute returns with little or even

    negative correlation with the broader markets.

    This was not unique to the current credit crisisand history shows that managed futures have

    achieved this during other difcult equity

    market environments.

    The highly diversied nature of managed

    futures portfolios is one of the primary factors

    explaining how managed futures have been

    able to deliver uncorrelated returns over time.

    For example, currencies, bonds, interest rates,

    stocks, metals and agricultural markets are

    all normally traded within a highly diversied

    managed futures portfolio.

    Trading futures has a number of advantages,especially in the current uncertain climate.

    Their use allows managed futures managers

    to take advantage of both rising and falling

    markets, enabling managers to be exible

    and react quickly to price moves. Another

    important feature is that futures are traded

    on highly regulated exchanges that offer

    transparent pricing and centralized clearing,

    which mitigates counterparty risk. Margining

    also results in managed futures being very cash

    efcient and therefore liquid, an extremely

    important characteristic given the illiquidity

    problems that other hedge fund styles arecurrently experiencing.

    OFI: Whats the main risk? How can it be

    reduced?

    TW: For trend-followers, range-bound price

    activity or short-term reversals are market

    conditions that can have a negative impact on

    performance. While this can happen over the

    short term, over the longer term a decrease in

    power of the inefciency exploited can pose

    a greater risk to managed futures managers.

    Since we began trading in 1987, AHL has

    continually researched and rened its tradingsystems in order to enhance its systematic

    trading approach and therefore counter these

    and other risks. Our emphasis on research and

    development, in particular the establishment

    of the Man Research Laboratory in Oxford,

    puts us in an even stronger position to manage

    these risks both now and in the future.

    Since we

    began trading

    in 1987,

    AHL has

    continually

    researched

    and refned

    its trading

    systems

    in order toenhance its

    systematic

    trading

    approach

  • 8/2/2019 OFI24Feb2009

    5/16

    Copyright 2009 Opalesque Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

    5

    ISSUE 2 24 FEBRUARY, 2009

    opalesque.com

    OPALESQUE FUTURES

    NEWS BRIEFS

    Managed Futures Gain Asset ShareManaged futures assets were at last year while hedge fund industry assets were decimated

    by redemptions and trading losses. The latest data from Barclay Hedge has commodity trading

    advisor assets at $206 billion at the end of 2008, about the same as in 2007. Meanwhile, totalhedge fund assets shrank from $1.9 trillion in May 2008 to $1.1 trillion in December, according to

    Barclay Hedge.

    That means managed futures assets are at 19% of hedge fund assets. In 2002, by contrast, the

    ratio was close to 6%. The managed futures sector may get an even larger percentage share

    of the shrinking asset pie, but how much additional money that would bring is unclear. With

    managed futures the top-performing strategy after short selling in 2008, many CTAs hope to gain

    assets in 2009.

    Investors continued to redeem heavily from hedge funds in January, according to press

    reports. Because databases contain different groups of managers and use different criteria in

    extrapolating industry assets, the numbers vary across data sources. For instance, HedgeFund.

    net estimated that hedge fund assets fell to $1.84 trillion in December, down from a peak of

    $2.97 trillion in the second quarter of 2008. This estimate is larger than the Barclay number due tothe application of different criteria, among other reasons.

    Despite the disparity in the numbers, the growing size of managed futures relative to the rest of

    the industry shows up in different databases. The exact percentage varies, however.

    CTAs Slip in January, Discretionary Beats SystematicManaged futures ended a successful run in 2008 with a loss in January, while other hedge fund

    styles recovered. Depending on the database you consult, the CTA January loss varied from 0.1%

    to 0.56%. But Managed Futures Europe posted a gain, while the larger Barclay database shows

    that discretionary traders made money during the month (Table below).

    January Returns, Various Indexes

    Barclay CTA Index (-)0.13%

    Barclay Discretionary Traders 1.28%

    Barclay Systematic Traders (-)0.36%

    Managed Futures Europe 0.48%.

    EDHEC CTA Global (-)0.29

    Greenwich Futures (-)0.1

    Credit Suisse/ Tremont Managed Futures (-)0.56%

  • 8/2/2019 OFI24Feb2009

    6/16

    Copyright 2009 Opalesque Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

    6

    ISSUE 2 24 FEBRUARY, 2009

    opalesque.com

    OPALESQUE FUTURES

    NEWS BRIEFS

    Global Advisors Eases Redemption TermsGlobal Advisors LP, a specialist commodity hedge fund manager located in London and Jersey,

    agreed to remove all gating provisions contained in the terms and conditions of its Global

    Commodity Systematic Fund.

    Daniel Masters, who co-founded Global Advisors in 1999 with Russell Newton, says GCS is a

    highly liquid program that trades the largest of the exchange-listed physical commodity futures

    contracts.

    In the current investment climate we are passing on our underlying liquidity to investors in our

    fund, he says. This action is in response to demands from investors globally, that we feel are

    justied, that hedge fund managers should always be able to meet redemption requests.

    The Global Commodity Systematic program has returned a compound annualized rate of 19%

    since its inception in 2005.

    In the past year or so many funds used gates to delay withdrawals by investors, often arguing that

    this was necessary to avoid selling the funds assets at extremely low prices under crisis conditions.

    Traders Plan to Increase Option UseUS options industry commissions totaled an estimated $2.6 billion as increased volume and

    participation by asset managers drove brokerage commissions to new records in 2008, according

    to a study by TABB Group.

    Trading volumes are expected to decline 17% in 2009 but rise again in 2010. Andy Nybo, senior

    analyst at Tabb and author of the study, says the future looks bright because nearly 70% of

    the traders interviewed expect to increase their use of options as normalcy returns to the

    marketplace and they deploy strategies suspended amidst 2008s market volatility.

    He found that despite the growth in the options market, traders leading complaint continuesto be liquidity, which favors bulge-bracket dealers delivering a full suite of services. Traders

    are willing to use the phone if they can get a better price by talking with a dealer, but for

    tight markets with sufcient size, electronic trading will provide the biggest bang for the buck

    especially when commissions are factored into the equation.

    TABB Group interviewed 54 traders at asset managers, hedge funds, market makers and

    proprietary trading rms with combined assets under management of $4.9 trillion, trading an

    average 15.7 million contracts monthly.

    CME Introduces Forex E-MicrosCME Group plans launch a series of smaller-sized foreign exchange contracts, called Forex

    E-Micros, in the rst quarter of this year. The new contracts will be one-tenth the size of the

    corresponding regular CME FX contracts, making them cost-effective for individual traders orsmaller Commodity Trading Advisers.

    Derek Sammann, head of FX Products at CME, says that individual traders looking to participate

    in the global FX market or small businesses seeking a cost-effective hedging tool for their FX risk

    can choose Forex E-micro futures as a versatile and accessible new instrument to manage their

    exposure.

  • 8/2/2019 OFI24Feb2009

    7/16

    Copyright 2009 Opalesque Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

    7

    ISSUE 2 24 FEBRUARY, 2009

    opalesque.com

    OPALESQUE FUTURES

    INSIDER TALK

    Opalesque Futures Intelligence: Whats the

    advantage of investing in futures markets?

    Jon Knudsen: The three huge advantages tofutures are the liquidity, the ease of marking

    positions and minimizing your credit risk by

    using clearing houses.

    OFI: Whats the biggest risk?

    JK: Probably the most immediate danger to

    an investor is a manager violating agreed-

    upon limits on positions and losses because

    he is unable or unwilling to get out of a

    position. The risk is not catching this soon

    enough to mitigate most of the loss.

    OFI: How do you get around that?

    JK: You minimize the chance of something

    like that by staying in touch with the clearing

    houses and knowing the manager well. We

    track our managers positions and compare

    their returns to what we expect them to be

    on the basis of market movements. If theres

    a discrepancy between what we expect and

    whats being produced, thats a cause for

    investigation. Also, you diversify the portfolio

    so as to get away from single manager risk.

    OFI: Whats the basics for allocating to

    managed futures?

    JK: Broadly, you make the most returns

    with trend followers but you have to decide

    how much volatility you want to take. There

    are enough managers with different return

    streams that you can construct a diversied

    portfolio.

    OFI: How would you diversify among CTAs?

    JK: CTAs are becoming more specialized.

    You might get one that specializes innancials, another that primarily trades

    agricultural commodities. There are very

    long term trend followers and others who

    have a short time horizon. Some put on

    trades lasting only hours or even minutes.

    These have different returns from most

    trend followers. Others put on relative

    value trades, taking advantage of seasonal

    What Do Investors Look For?We have a seasoned investor to tell us what characteristics of

    managed future attract/ deter investors. Jon Knudsen has been

    allocating money to hedge funds for around 20 years and has in-

    depth experience with futures. Among the positions he held at

    Goldman Sachs was portfolio manager of the Goldman Sachs Tactical

    Trading Fund, a multi-advisor macro and futures fund.

    He started his career in futures as a runner for a Chicago commodity

    house, muscling his way into the trading pit. Currently he is co-chief

    investment ofcer of Tapestry Asset Management LP, where he helps

    design and manage portfolios for institutional investors.

  • 8/2/2019 OFI24Feb2009

    8/16

    Copyright 2009 Opalesque Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

    8

    ISSUE 2 24 FEBRUARY, 2009

    opalesque.com

    OPALESQUE FUTURES

    INSIDER TALK

    changes or other variations in markets. Much like you

    blend stocks in an equity portfolio, here you have

    long-term, short-term and relative value traders.

    OFI: Is there anything specic about doing due

    diligence on CTAs versus other hedge funds?

    JK: With a systematic CTA, you need to look at how

    the system was constructed and the idea behind

    it. Equity managers tend to tell you exactly what

    they do and the metrics they use, but may not

    want to show their positions. Its the opposite with

    CTAstheyll give you the details of their positions

    but might talk only vaguely about how the signals are

    generated!

    OFI: How do you get a handle on those signals?

    JK: It helps to have both some technical analysis-

    statistical background and trading experience in

    order to understand whether a CTA really has

    insight into how markets function. Some people

    can construct models but do not really understand

    markets. You have to see whether they have market

    knowledge to match their modeling skills.

    OFI: Dont investors complain that CTAs rely on

    unfathomable black boxes?

    JK: Investors fail to understand the systematic

    managers, largely because the CTAs themselvesmake the process too opaque. Many managed

    futures strategies are simple, though applied in a

    very precise way.

    OFI: Why do some funds of funds not invest in

    managed futures?

    JK: If you look at the past few years, until relativelyrecently managed futures returns were by and large

    not as attractive as returns from other hedge fund

    strategies like long/short equity. A second barrier is

    that CTA and macro returns tend to be lumpyyou

    can have a period of substantial returns followed by

    a period of at or negative returns. By comparison

    arbitrage strategies were yielding consistent returns.

    If people just followed the numbers and did not look

    ahead, they saw no reason to invest in managed

    futures. A third factor is some CTA returns are very

    volatilebut not all of them are, and recently we saw

    how volatile other strategies can be.

    OFI: What would you advise a would-be investor?

    JK: While its a good idea to analyze the numbers

    using quantitative methods, you need a lot of

    qualitative work to see where the returns came

    from and what one can expect in different market

    conditions.

  • 8/2/2019 OFI24Feb2009

    9/16

    Copyright 2009 Opalesque Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

    9

    ISSUE 2 24 FEBRUARY, 2009

    opalesque.com

    OPALESQUE FUTURES

    FUTURES LAB

    Managed futures have historically provided

    excellent diversication, strong returns and good

    downside protection. As with all investments,

    however, there is the possibility of loss.

    A future or forward contract is a derivative

    instrument, the value of which depends on the

    value of an underlying asset. Trading in futures

    is a speculative activity and futures prices can

    be highly volatile. Market prices are difcult

    to predict and are inuenced by many factors,

    including changes in interest rates, weather

    conditions, government interventions and

    political and economic events.

    Variations and VolatilityThe managed futures style is generally

    characterized by wide variations in returns.

    We see this in the monthly distribution of theStark 300 Trader Index, compiled using the top

    300 trading programs from Starks database of

    CTA programs. For the period January 1994 to

    November 30, 2008, the monthly distribution of

    returns for this index ranged from (-)6.39% to

    8.16%.

    That does not capture the entire range of

    possible returns that are typical for a single

    CTA manager. When we applied Monte Carlo

    modeling, we found a probability distribution

    showing expected annual returns ranging from

    around (-)30% to over 50%.

    Moreover, variation across managers may

    grow. Managed futures managers continuously

    research new technologies and trading

    approaches in order to identify and prot

    from these trends. The scientic approach to

    managed futures trading has spawned a wide

    variety of different trading strategies, which

    today allow certain traders to capture even small

    trends.

    The introduction of electronic trading allowed

    managed futures managers to execute their

    trades efciently and, when needed, generally

    reduce their positions quickly, thus making

    shorter-term and smaller-scale opportunities

    accessible. It thereby expanded the investable

    universe for the investment approach.

    This combination of market growth, persistent

    trends and ongoing research means that there

    is still substantial room for development in the

    managed futures industry. However, as strategies

    become more sophisticated and the race to

    develop new techniques and trade infrastructure

    heats up, the gap between the most developed

    trading managers and the following pack may

    widen further.

    The wide range of possible returns is indicative

    of CTA managers high volatility targets.

    Compared to other hedge fund styles, managed

    futures have the highest return potential but

    also high volatility and downside deviation.

    They have lower Sharpe and Sortino ratios than

    other hedge fund styles, reecting their greater

    volatility.

    However, as managed futures typically have a

    low correlation to other hedge fund styles,

    the strategy tends to enhance the overall Sharpe

    and Sortino ratios of a diversied fund of hedgefunds portfolio.

    Investors might note that Sharpe and Sortino

    ratios are not the only statistical measures one

    should look at. As managed futures are not

    normally distributed, these statistical gures may

    not correctly capture the complete risk/return

    prole of this style. Hence higher moments such

    as skewness should also be taken into account.

    An important point to keep in mind is that

    the distribution of managed futures returns is

    positively skewed. This is an attractive feature of

    trend-following CTA programs.

    LeverageFutures and forwards are traded on margin

    meaning that only a small deposit is required

    to take a position. Depending on the volatility

    of a commodity, margins can vary between

    0.05% and 5% of the notional value of the

    commodity. One can therefore achieve 100%

    investment exposure with just a fraction of the

    capital required through the inherent leverage

    of futures contracts. This frees up capital, which

    can be invested elsewhere or used to adjust the

    leverage of ones portfolio to match the clientsrisk appetite.

    Because margin requirements are low, there is

    inherently a high degree of leverage, which will

    increase returns but will also magnify losses.

    A relatively small movement in the price of a

    futures contract may result in immediate and

    substantial loss or gain to a fund holding a

    position in such contract.

    A fund may also invest in forward contracts,

    options, swaps and over-the-counter derivative

    instruments, among others. Like other leveraged

    investments, trading in these securities mayresult in losses in excess of the amount invested.

    There is also the risk that counterparties will be

    unable to fulll their obligations, whether due

    to insolvency, bankruptcy or other causes, which

    could result in losses. If a Futures Commission

    Merchant retained by a manager were to

    become bankrupt, it is possible that the fund

    We present a review of certain risks associated with managed futures and ways of monitoring

    and controlling these risks. This discussion summarizes part of a longer and more detailed study

    by Man Investments, an arm of Man Group. The terms managed futures and commodity trading

    advisors are used interchangeably.

    Risks and Controls

  • 8/2/2019 OFI24Feb2009

    10/16

    Copyright 2009 Opalesque Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

    10

    ISSUE 2 24 FEBRUARY, 2009

    opalesque.com

    OPALESQUE FUTURES

    FUTURES LAB

    would be able to recover none or only part of its

    assets held by that FCM.

    Risk Measures

    Risk management is crucial and increasinglymore complicated, requiring a signicant portion

    of a managers time. To mitigate the dangers

    CTAs apply risk controls and mostly trade with

    counterparties on risk-averse nancial exchanges.

    At the end of the day a CTAs infrastructure is

    key. Only managers that stay at the forefront

    of new research and trading ideas will be able

    to cope with the challenges of monitoring and

    limiting risk.

    Todays trading systems are complex and rely on

    different techniques to analyze the vast

    quantities of data available. The zero-sum game

    of futures trading forces all participants to

    continuously research the behavior of their peers

    and to adapt their strategy in an effort to stayahead in the pursuit of excess returns.

    In many respects research and risk management

    go hand in glove, as new trading ideas will

    often require new or additional risk monitoring

    tools. Of course, there is no guarantee that a

    managers risk controls will be successful.

    Diversified TradingThe increasing liquidity of new instruments and

    markets such as credit derivatives, emerging

    markets, exchange-traded funds and swaps has

    generated many more trading opportunities for

    CTA managers, emphasizing the importance of

    strong research capabilities. In order to detect

    new trading opportunities CTAs must constantly

    develop their systems.

    Exposures across a wide range of sectors may

    help to smooth returns, as individual sectors

    often tend to exhibit different behavioral

    characteristics. The factors affecting the world

    commodity markets, for example, differ from

    those inuencing nancial futures. While in both

    cases long-term trends are usually driven by

    economic growth and stability, short- or medium-

    term movements in commodity markets aresensitive to seasonal effects as well as sudden

    changes in supply or demand that result from

    environmental or political factors.

    Hence there is a high degree of uncertainty

    in commodities markets and futures trading

    allows investors to reap gains (or experience

    losses) from the sometimes fervent upward and

    downward price movements that result from the

    uncertainty.

    Geographical diversication can help reduce

    risk. The signicant growth in the number and

    diversity of futures markets in recent years hasfacilitated a broadly diversied approach across

    regions and asset classes. This approach aims to

    control risk by avoiding over-concentration within

    particular sectors and markets.

    (See next page.)

    Understanding the StrategySome people call managed futures black box

    trading. A black box is an input/output device

    such as a transistor. Many users are not familiar

    with the logic inside a black box. The term blackbox suggests that investors cannot understand

    CTA trade strategies. This criticism is misleading.

    CTAs are characterized by rule-based investment

    strategies. Trading strategies are hard coded and

    often programmed into computer algorithms. To

    prevent their proprietary ideas from being stolen,

    managers are typically reluctant to divulge the

    exact composition of their trading models.

    However, while a managed futures manager will

    not be asked to reveal the exact programming

    for his trades when being screened by a fund

    of hedge funds manager, it is crucial that the

    developer understands and explains the trading

    strategy and the associated risks. Investors can

    have comfort in evaluating past performance

    only when the manager adheres to a predened

    strategy and explains that strategy to investors.

    Compared to managed futures, most traditional

    equity portfolio advisors such as mutual funds

    make their investment decisions from a changing

    mix of fundamentals, news and technical data.

    To this end, their cause and effect may be much

    more unpredictable than systematic CTA models,

    which are not based on ad hoc trading decisions.

    Thus the systematic approach, if properly

    explained and adhered to, gives investors a

    better basis for estimating future returns and risk.

    The major risk monitoringmeasures and focus areas are:

    Stress testing - measures current

    market positions against historical

    price data. This allows the CTA to

    see how his current position sizes

    would have performed historically,

    especially during periods of

    market stress.

    Implied volatility - is a forward-

    looking measure of potential risk

    that is analyzed for each market

    Leverage - if levels approach

    certain multiples of prevailing net

    asset value, a review is triggered.

    Margin-to-equity ratios if initial

    margin requirements relative to

    prevailing net asset value reach

    pre-dened levels, a review is

    undertaken that may result in a

    reduction in positions.

    Net exposures to sectors and

    different currencies.

    Value-at-Risk (VaR) - measures

    the expected maximum loss from

    an investment portfolio when

    futures markets conditions are

    similar to those in the model. The

    value is determined for a specic

    time interval and certain level of

    condence.

  • 8/2/2019 OFI24Feb2009

    11/16

    Copyright 2009 Opalesque Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

    11

    ISSUE 2 24 FEBRUARY, 2009

    opalesque.com

    OPALESQUE FUTURES

    FUTURES LAB

    Top 30 Derivatives ExchangesRanked by Number of Contracts Traded and/or Cleared

    Rank Jan-Oct 2008 Change from 2007

    1 CME Group 2,901,709,573 9.91%

    2 Korea Exchange 2,343,607,538 (-)2.03%

    3 Eurex 1,907,749,030 18.50%

    4 Chicago Board Options Exchange 1,033,816,153 33.40%

    5 Liffe 915,891,375 14.63%

    6 International Securities Exchange 883,864,868 35.66%

    7 BM&F Bovespa 642,499,555 (-)8.80%

    8 Philadelphia Stock Exchange 472,640,506 45.52%

    9 National Stock Exchange of India 467,212,144 48.75%

    10 JSE (South Africa) 409,534,082 64.58%

    11 NYSE Arca Options 368,630,879 42.39%

    12 Dalian Commodity Exchange 258,453,517 95.85%

    13 Russian Trading System Stock Exchange 208,858,253 93.83%

    14 IntercontinentalExchange 201,193,121 22.18%

    15 American Stock Exchange 181,632,092 (-)9.60%

    16 Zhengzhou Commodity Exchange 168,556,419 144.66%

    17 Boston Options Exchange 152,666,603 47.27%

    18 Osaka Securities Exchange 138,099,321 58.69%

    19 Moscow Interbank Currency Exchange 128,008,861 74.48%

    20 OMX Group 124,575,959 3.18%

    21 Taiwan Futures Exchange 114,452,854 19.66%

    22 London Metal Exchange 94,713,908 23.05%

    23 Shanghai Futures Exchange 94,442,774 44.90%

    24 Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing 89,384,940 24.92%

    25 Australian Securities Exchange 83,840,354 (-)13.01%

    26 Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange 78,334,573 (-)8.53%

    27 Multi Commodity Exchange of India 75,373,290 32.49%

    28 Mercado Espaol de Futuros Financieros 68,089,896 75.31%

    29 Mexican Derivatives Exchange 62,282,005 (-)69.38%

    30 Tokyo Financial Exchange 59,400,463 (-)9.86%

    Source: Futures Industry Association

  • 8/2/2019 OFI24Feb2009

    12/16

    Copyright 2009 Opalesque Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

    12

    ISSUE 2 24 FEBRUARY, 2009

    opalesque.com

    OPALESQUE FUTURES

    MANAGER PROFILES

    David Mousseau of Lone Wolf Investments LLCDavid was the head trader for a subsidiary of Northern Indiana Public Service Corporation, where he was

    responsible for the risk-management of existing physical electricity positions and proprietary trading. He

    has worked for various other energy businesses.

    2008 return for Carbon Emissions Instrument Program: 15%

    Comments: Our proprietary model was designed to systematically trade the European Union Carbon

    allowance emissions futures market in Europe. The carbon emission markets are quite new but offer

    the opportunity for tremendous growth. This model is designed to capture the movements that energy

    products generally display. The program trades both the current years emission vintage and the next years

    emission vintage. The contracts call for physical delivery/receipt of emission credits but all positions will be

    liquidated prior to the month of delivery.

    Gabriel Pellegrini of Global Edge Capital ManagementBased in Sao Paolo, Brazil, Gabriel has worked at Bolsa de Mercadorias & Futuros after an earlier career as

    a teachers assistant.

    2008 return: 23%

    Comments: Our investment approach is diversied among 13 strategies simultaneously to generate

    both short-term and long-term gains. The strategy further diversies across different trading time frames

    ranging from four to 90 days. We trade more than 100 futures contracts on agricultural products, metals,

    energies, currencies, interest rates and stock indices on US, European, Asian, African and Australiaexchanges.

    January was a good month for our short term strategies, which showed prots in both stock

    indexes and currencies. The volatility in equities markets around the world contributed to the months

    performance, however we experienced some losses in the xed-income sector where the rise in interest

    rates negatively impacted sector returns.

    Tim Pickering of Auspice Capital AdvisorsBefore founding Auspice, Tim was Vice President of Options Trading at Shell Trading Gas and Power

    in both Houston and Calgary. Prior to that, he traded for TD Securities in Toronto in a wide range of

    instruments including foreign exchange, bonds, money markets and exotic derivatives. In addition to

    Auspice he currently manages an exchange-traded fund for Claymore.

    2008 return in Diversified Commodity Fund: 44%

    Comments: The portfolio is diversied across global commodity and nancial futures and invests

    only in liquid exchange traded futures contracts. Auspice derives its edge in the markets from a deep

    understanding of the correlations and volatility of the individual assets and sectors. The at return in

    January illustrates the funds ability to be a store of value in periods of continued equity weakness.

    Up-and-coming managers with diverse approaches describe their strategy and what they see

    happening in the markets. Their comments have been edited.

  • 8/2/2019 OFI24Feb2009

    13/16

    Copyright 2009 Opalesque Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

    13

    ISSUE 2 24 FEBRUARY, 2009

    opalesque.com

    OPALESQUE FUTURES

    MANAGER PROFILES

    Douglas Bry of Northfield Trading LP

    In his early career, Doug was a trial attorney. In 1987 he and Philip Spertus formed Technical TradingStrategies Inc. to apply computer technology to the creation of quantitative models for trading global

    futures markets and in 1989 they formed Northeld.

    2008 return for Diversified Program: 14.3%

    Comments: Northeld is a 100% systematic Commodity Trading Advisor that evolved from a software

    rm. The Diversied Program is an absolute return strategy that seeks to prot from both up and down

    price movements in the global nancial and commodity markets. Designed specically not to be trend

    dependent, the Program trades a diversied portfolio of up to 50 of the most liquid and transparent

    global markets, with a primary focus on stock indexes, interest rates, currencies and energy markets.

    2008 was a tumultuous year for most asset classes and investments. However, through this

    difcult period, Commodity Trading Advisors handled the risk and volatility well. After posting a 24%

    return in 2007, the Northeld Trading Diversied Program continued to perform well in 2008 and is up

    46% over the past 36 months ended December 2008.

    Charlie & Jes Santalauria of Parrot Trading Partners LLCJes is an experienced real estate developer who along with his son Charlie manages several portfolios

    employing their unique Calendar Condor hybrid options and futures strategy. Charlie recently spoke

    at a hedge fund incubation conference held at the Harvard Club of New York. Both Jes and Charlie were

    featured emerging money managers at the MFA Chicago conference the year before last.

    2008 return: 11%

    Comments: We are in a trading environment that has never been seen before. Markets have becomenumb to grim economic reports. The US economy has lost approximately 1.5 million jobs over the past

    three months and another 2 million since the recession began in Dec. 2007 (3.5 million total). We expect

    the economic data to surprise both on the upside (sparking rallies) and downside in coming months.

    Our strategy for the upcoming months will be to add positions throughout each move and to

    take prots accordingly. We will be more conservative than we have been in the past, but expect that we

    can generate returns similar to those in past years relative to the S&P 500.

  • 8/2/2019 OFI24Feb2009

    14/16

    Copyright 2009 Opalesque Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

    14

    ISSUE 2 24 FEBRUARY, 2009

    opalesque.com

    OPALESQUE FUTURES

    REGULATORS & COURTS

    It looks like there is an epidemic of futures-related scams, with

    new ones coming to light every week. But the large number

    of incidents may be a result of regulators becoming more

    aggressive in investigating and taking action.

    Since the last issue of OFI two weeks ago, the US Commodity

    Futures Trading Commission announced the following

    enforcement actions:A federal court froze the assets of an Illinois Commodity

    Pool Operator run from Toronto, Canada. CFTC charged

    that Brookshire Raw Materials Management LLC and its

    Canadian managers John M. Marshall and Stephen Z.

    Adams took more than $4.6 million in a Ponzi Scheme

    from September 2006 to December 2008. They were

    supposed to invest client proceeds in a portfolio of

    commodity futures and forward contracts designed to

    replicate the investment methodology of corresponding

    indexes developed by another Brookshire rm. According

    to the CFTC, in December 2008 Messrs. Marshall and

    Adams closed their ofces, destroyed company data

    stored on computer servers and failed to acknowledgeredemption requests. The Ontario Securities Commission

    worked with the CFTC on the case. Regulators are seeking

    further penalties.

    CFTC charged Hawaii-based Marvin Cooper and Billion

    Coupons Inc. with defrauding deaf people in a $4.4

    million foreign currency scheme. Mr. Cooper allegedly

    attracted customers with promises of 15% to 25% monthly

    returns from foreign exchange trading. He lured 125 deaf

    Americans and Japanese, using his own deafness to relate

    to them. The CFTC says he spent more than $1.4 million

    of client money for such items as ying lessons and a $1

    million home and used $1.6 million to pay out fake prots

    as well as commissions. A court froze his and the rms

    assets and appointed a temporary receiver.CFTC sought to freeze the assets of Mark Trimble of

    Edmond, Oklahoma, and his company, Phidippides Capital

    Management LLC, for deceiving some 60 investors in the

    Phidippides hedge fund. Mr. Trimble allegedly operated

    the $34 million fund from 2005 on and since at least

    October 2007 issued false account statements to cover up

    multi-million trading losses while paying redeemers from

    other investors money. In addition, he is charged with

    taking over $1 million in management fees based on false

    reports of prots.

    Stephen Obie, acting director of the CFTC enforcement

    division, says The CFTC continues to zealously prosecute

    these lecherous schemes, so that as many assets can be

    preserved as possible as we fulll our vital mission to

    protect customers from fraud and abuse.

    Frank Anthony DeSantis III of Florida was sentenced to108 months in prison and over $2 million in tax penalties

    for wire fraud and conspiracy to defraud the Internal

    Revenue Service while operating and having a stake in

    several commodity investment and telemarketing schemes

    in Southern Florida. He misrepresented material facts to

    potential customers in order to convince them to invest

    in foreign currency options and deliberately failed to tell

    customers that more than 95% of customers lost money

    and that he was previously barred by the CFTC from acting

    as a commodities broker.

    CFTC ordered a former employee of the Bank of America

    to pay a $360,000 penalty for false trading reports he

    submitted to the bank, in addition to a restitution of the$12 million loss he caused. Michael Moster, currently

    of New York, was a proprietary trader for the Bank of

    America in January 2004, when he falsely reported that he

    purchased 4,000 Treasury futures contracts. This concealed

    the risk associated with large unauthorized positions in

    Treasury bonds that he had established, by making it

    appear as if the long futures position hedged the Treasury

    bond risk. By the following week, the ctitious trades

    inated the value of his trading book by over $12 million.

    The sale of the unauthorized Treasury bond position

    caused a loss of $12.2 million. In the criminal case against

    him, he is required to compensate the bank for the loss.

    On a separate matter, the CFTC seeks public comment on aproposal to change the requirements for Acknowledgment

    Letters. These are letters that a futures commission merchant

    or derivatives clearing organization must obtain from any

    depositor holding segregated customer funds or funds of

    foreign futures or foreign options customers. The proposal

    can be obtained from the website www.cftc.gov and those

    interested can submit their comments via email to secretary@

    cftc.gov. All comments are to be posted on the website.

    Futures Ponzi SchemesContinue to Emerge

  • 8/2/2019 OFI24Feb2009

    15/16

    Copyright 2009 Opalesque Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

    15

    ISSUE 2 24 FEBRUARY, 2009

    opalesque.com

    OPALESQUE FUTURES

    TOP TEN

    The list below comes from Autumn Gold, a commodity trading advisor information service founded by Kim Avery. This is one

    of several types of rankings available from the service.

    Ms. Avery has been involved in the futures industry since 1977. She has worked for E.F. Hutton, Merrill Lynch, Balfour Maclaine

    Futures, Price Group and Futures Asset Management. From 1992 through 1998 she was European marketing consultant to

    Renaissance Technologies in marketing the Medallion Fund to European investors.

    Autumn Gold January 2009 Top Ten Funds

    Program Company Last Monthly

    Return

    12-Month

    Return

    Silver Conservative Pearlman CTA 24.7% (-)60%

    Aggressive Growth Madgroup Invs. 18.4% 80%

    Ultra S&P (Proprietary Trading) Paragon Capital Mgt. 13.1% (-)30%

    Stairs Program White Indian Trading Co. 10.6% 55%

    VCM-Global Futures 2X Vision Capital Mgt. 10.3% 136%

    Trading Edge Stein Inv. Mgt. 10.2 (-)14%

    Standard Growth Madgroup Invs. 10% 33%

    FX Global Yield Waypoint Capital Mgt. 9.9% (-)4%

    Option Selling Strategy Financial Comm. Invs. 9.2% (-)19%

    Diversied Futures Program Marchese Capital Mgt. 8.4% 62%

    We will feature top managers from a

    different database every month.

  • 8/2/2019 OFI24Feb2009

    16/16

    Copyright 2009 Opalesque Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

    PUBLISHERMatthias Knab - [email protected]

    EDITORChidem Kurdas - [email protected]

    ADVERTISING DIRECTORDenice Galicia - [email protected]

    EDITORIAL ADVISORTim Merryman - [email protected]

    CONTRIBUTORSBucky Isaacson, Frank Pusateri, Pavel Topol, Ty Andros,

    Walt Gallwas.

    www.opalesque.com