oct 29 planning committee meeting

7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting

1/167

Vision: The City of Greater Sudbury is a growing,

world-class community bringing talent, technology and a

great northern lifestyle together.

Vision: La Ville du Grand Sudbury est u

croissante de calibre international qui ras

les technologies et le style de vie except

AgendaPlanning Committeemeeting to be held

Monday, October 29th, 2012

at 5:30 pm

Tom Davies Square

Ordre du jour

runion du

Comit de planificatioqui aura lieu

lundi 29e octobre 2012

17h 30

Place Tom Davies


2/167

Planning Committee Meeting

Monday, October 29, 2012

Tom Davies Square

COUNCILLOR DAVE KILGOUR, CHAIR

Andr Rivest, Vice-Chair

4:45 P.M.

CLOSED SESSION PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING

COMMITTEE ROOM C-11

To deal with: One Acquisition/Disposition of Land Matters: Sale of Vacant Land - M

Street, Sudbury

5:30 P.M. OPEN SESSION PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING

COUNCIL CHAMBER

Council and Committee Meetings are accessible. For more information regarding acc

please call 3-1-1 or email [email protected]

DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE

THEREOF

MATTERS ARISING FROM THE "CLOSED SESSION"

At this point in the meeting, the Chair of the Closed Session, Councillor Rivest, will ri

t th lt f th Cl d S i " Th C itt ill th id

PLANNING CO

AGENDA
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]


3/167

PUBLIC HEARINGS

1. Report dated October 16, 2012 from the General Manager of Growth andDevelopment regarding Application for temporary use by-law to permit outdoor

storage and parking of construction and mining equipment, 3024 Falconbridge

Highway, Garson - Falcon Hotel Ltd.

(RECOMMENDATION PREPARED)

2. Report dated October 16, 2012 from the General Manager of Growth and

Development regarding Application for rezoning in order to permit the use ofthe property as a Contractor's Yard for the storage of equipment and civil

construction material, 7275 & 7289 Estaire Road, Sudbury - Nolcar

Corporation.



Development regarding Applications for Official Plan Amendment and rezoningin order to permit a new elementary school, Frood Road, Sudbury - Sudbury

Catholic District School Board.



Development regarding Applications for rezoning and subdivision approval in

order to create a 163-lot subdivision to be developed for single and doubleresidential uses, MacMillan Drive, Val Therese - 630411 Ontario Inc.


Letter of concern received January 12, 2012 from John Cerilli, area resident;

Letter of concern dated August 5, 2009 from Tal B. Lyons, area resident;

Letter of concern dated August 9, 2009 from Graham and Karen McNally, area

residents;

Letter of concern dated August 10, 2009 from Mike White, area resident;

Letters of concern dated August 17, 2009 and November 8, 2012 from Tim and Brenda

Young, area residents;

Letter of concern dated August 18, 2009 from Ed Ducharme, area resident;

Letter of concern dated April 4, 2011 from Kristi Arnold, Dalron Construction Limited.


4/167

Each and every matter of business contained in the Consent Agenda is recorded separately in the minu

meeting.)

ROUTINE MANAGEMENT REPORTS

C-1. Report dated October 16, 2012 from the General Manager of Growth and

Development regarding Consent referral request for Consent Applications

B92/2012 to B94/2012, 5174 Desmarais Road, Hanmer - Diane & Marcel

Boulais.



Development regarding Request to rescind Deeming By-law 91-18,

Subdivision M-1003, Scenic View, Lot 10, Concession 3, Township of Neelon

Zulich Enterprises Limited.


CORRESPONDENCE FOR INFORMATION ONLY


Development regarding Draft Provincial Policy Statement Review.

(FOR INFORMATION ONLY)

(The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing has recently released a draft version

of an updated Provincial Policy Statement for review and comment. The purpose of

this report is to provide Planning Committee with brief overview of the draft PPS, thecommenting period and next steps.)

ADJOURNMENT

LISA OLDRIDGE, Deputy City Clerk

LIZ COLLIN, Committee Assistant


5/167

Runion du Comit de planification29 octobre 2012Place Tom Davies

CONSEILLER DAVE KILGOUR, PRSIDENT(E)

Andr Rivest, Vice-prsident(e)

16H 45 SANCE HUIS CLOS DU COMIT DE LA PLANIFICATIONSALLE DE RUNION C-11Objet : traiter de une acquisitions / alinations de terrains

17H 30 SANCE PUBLIQUE DU COMIT DE LA PLANIFICATIONSALLE DU CONSEIL

Les runions du Conseil municipal et des comits sont accessibles. Pour obtenir prenseignements au sujet de l'accessibilit, veuillez composer le 3-1-1 ou faire parvenir

l'adresse [email protected].

DCLARATION DINTRTS PCUNIAIRES ET LEUR NATURE GNRAL

QUESTIONS DCOULANT DE LA SANCE HUIS CLOS

Le prsident de la sance huis clos, le conseiller Rivest, se lve maintenant et en prrsultats. Le Comit examine ensuite les recommandations.

COMIT DE PLANI

ORDRE DU JOUR


6/167

AUDIENCES PUBLIQUES1. Rapport du directeur gnral de la croissance et du dveloppement, dat du 16

octobre 2012 portant sur Demande de rglement municipal dutilisationtemporaire pour permettre lutilisation dune aire dentreposage lextrieur etdun stationnement pour du matriel de construction et dexploitation minire,3024, route Falconbridge, Garson Falcon Hotel Ltd.(RECOMMANDATION PRPARE)

2. Rapport du directeur gnral de la croissance et du dveloppement, dat du 16octobre 2012 portant sur Demande de rezonage afin de permettre une courdentrepreneur pour entreposer de lquipement ainsi que du matriel deconstruction civile, 7275 et 7289, chemin Estaire, Sudbury.(RECOMMANDATION PRPARE)

3. Rapport du directeur gnral de la croissance et du dveloppement, dat du 16octobre 2012 portant sur Demandes de modification du Plan officiel et derezonage afin de permettre une nouvelle cole lmentaire, chemin Frood,Sudbury Sudbury Catholic District School Board.(RECOMMANDATION PRPARE)

4. Rapport du directeur gnral de la croissance et du dveloppement, dat du 16octobre 2012 portant sur Demandes dapprobation de rezonage et delotissement afin de crer un lotissement de 163 lots pour logements individuelset logements doubles, promenade MacMillan, Val-Thrse 630411 OntarioInc.(RECOMMANDATION PRPARE)

Lettre de proccupation date du 12 janvier 2012 partir de John Cerilli;

Lettre de proccupation date du 5 aot 2009 partir de Tal B. Lyons;Lettre de proccupation date du 9 aot 2009 partir de Graham et Karen McNally;Lettre de proccupation date du 10 aot 2009 partir de Mike White;Lettre de proccupation date du 17 aot 2009 et 8 novembre 2009 partir de Tim etBrenda Young;Lettre de proccupation date du 18 aot 2009 partir de Ed Ducharme;L tt d ti d t d 4 il 2011 ti d K i ti A ld D l


7/167

lordre du jour des rsolutions. Toutes les questions daffaires lordre du jour des rsolutions sont inssparment au procs-verbal de la runion)

RAPPORTS DE GESTION COURANTS

C-1. Rapport du directeur gnral de la croissance et du dveloppement, dat du16 octobre 2012 portant sur Demande de renvoi de la demandedautorisation B92/2012 B94/2012, 5174 rue Desmarais, Hannmer - Diane Marcel Boulais.(RECOMMANDATION PRPARE)

C-2. Rapport du directeur gnral de la croissance et du dveloppement, dat du16 octobre 2012 portant sur Demander d'annuler Jugeant le rglement 91-18de la subdivision M-1003, Vue panoramique, lot 10, concession 3, canton deNeelon - Entreprises Zulich limite.(RECOMMANDATION PRPARE)

CORRESPONDANCE TITRE D'INFORMATIONC-3. Rapport du directeur gnral de la croissance et du dveloppement, dat du

16 octobre 2012 portant sur Examen de la Dclaration de principesprovinciale provisoire .(A TITRE D'INFORMATION)

(Le ministre des Affaires municipales et du Logement a rcemment publi uneversion actualise de la Dclaration de principes provinciale, aux fins dexamen et

dobservations. Le rapport en question vise prsenter les observations de laDivision des services de planification sur la version provisoire de la dclaration enquestion.)

LEVE DE LA SANCE

LISA OLDRIDGE, Greffire municipale adjointeLIZ COLLIN, Assistante du comit


8/167

Request for Decision

Application for temporary use by-law to permit

outdoor storage and parking of construction and

mining equipment, 3024 Falconbridge Highway,

Garson - Falcon Hotel Ltd

Presented To: Plan

Presented: Mon

Report Date Tue

Type: Pub

File Number: 751

Recommendation

THAT the City of Greater Sudbury approve the application by

Falcon Hotel Ltd. to amend By-law 2010-100Z being the City of

Greater Sudbury Zoning By-law with respect to those landsdescribed as Part of PIN 73494-0149, Part of Parcel 7464 SES,

Lot 6, Concession 1, Township of Garson in order to permit the

temporary outdoor storage and parking of construction and

mining equipment in part of the rear yard of the subject lands in

accordance with Section 39 of the Planning Act for a temporary

period of three years subject to the following:

1. That the temporary outdoor storage and parking ofconstruction and mining equipment shall only be permitted on

that portion of the lot located within 57 metres of the rear lot line

being the southerly boundary of Part 1, Plan 53R-5883.

2. That prior to the enactment of the amending by-law the owner

shall have constructed an opaque fence along the boundary of

the abutting lands to the east that are zoned R2-2, to the

satisfaction of the Director of Planning Services.

3. That the temporary by-law shall expire on November 20, 2015.

STAFF REPORT

Signed By

Report Prepared By

Glen Ferguson

Senior Planner

Digitally Signed Oct 1

Reviewed By

Eric Taylor

Manager of Developm


Recommended by th

Paul BaskcombDirector of Planning S


Recommended by th

Bill Lautenbach

General Manager of G

Development


Recommended by t

Doug NadoroznyChief Administrative O



9/167

To amend By-law 2010-100Z being the Zoning By-law for the City of Greater Sudbury in o

temporary use for a maximum period of three years.

Proposal:

The application is to permit the temporary outdoor storage and parking of construction an

equipment in a portion of the rear of the subject lands for a temporary period of three yea

Official Plan Conformity:

The subject lands are designated Mixed Use Commercial in the Official Plan for the City o

Sudbury. All uses are generally permitted within the Mixed Use Designation except for He

uses. Section 20.5.3 of the Official Plan permits Council to pass by-laws under the Plannithe temporary use of land, buildings, or structures, in defined areas and for prescribed pe

any purpose set out therein that is otherwise prohibited by the Zoning By-law. Conformity

policies of the Official Plan is not required for the passing of such a by-law.

Site Description & Surrounding Land Uses:

The subject lands are located on the south side of Falconbridge Highway between Eva S

Avenue in the community of Garson. The lands have a lot area of 0.87 ha (2.16 acres) w

70 m (229.66 ft) of frontage onto Falconbridge Highway. The portion of the lands that are

application are in the rear yard of the subject lands behind the existing hotel building. The

by the applicant depicts an approximate 2,804 m2 (30,185 ft2) area in the rear yard that i

purposes of storing construction and mining equipment for a temporary period of three ye

Surrounding uses are mixed with urban residential, general commercial and extractive ind

located in the general area. The portion of the lands to be used for temporary storage imm

"M5", Extractive Industrial zone (pit) to the south and other general commercial uses on th

Falconbridge Highway.

Departmental & Agency Comments:

Building Services

The current zoning by-law does not permit outdoor storage on any lot that is abutting a re

would require a 2.2 metre opaque fence around the entire perimeter of the subject area. W

that shelving over 2.2 m high not be permitted.

Development Engineering

No concerns.

Drainage


10/167

received by the Planning Services Division.

Planning Considerations:

Background

Staff has previously been advised by the applicant in July 2012 that the subject lands are

drilling and mining company for the temporary storage of mining and construction equipm

ATVs, drill rigs, front end loaders and trucks. Employees of the drilling and mining compa

provided with temporary accommodations at the Falcon Hotel which is also located on the

The applicant at this time also indicated that historically the area in question has been use

area for the hotel use. Staff would further note that By-law Enforcement has recently atten

lands with respect to the proposed use and the applicant is now seeking approval for a te

by-law in order to permit said use to remain on the lands.

Official Plan

Section 20.5.3 of the Official Plan permits Council to allow for the temporary use of land f

period of time. Staff notes that while conformity with the land use policies of the Official P

for the passing of such a by-law, it is important to consider the potential impacts that said

may have on abutting land uses. The following section of the report examines the issue o

compatibility as it pertains to the proposed temporary storage of mining and construction Land Use Compatibility

The lands to the immediate south are zoned for extractive industrial use and it is not antic

use conflict would occur between this use and the storage of mining and construction equ

to the immediate east are undeveloped residential lands which have been draft-approved

since September 4, 1990. This draft approval was recently further extended to Septembe

construction of the subdivision were to proceed, any further extensions of the temporary u

be re-examined in the future as the potential for land use conflict might arise. In order to possibility that residential development proceeds within the next three years on the subdiv

staff are recommending that an opaque fence be erected along the boundary of the R2-2

[approximately 22m (72 feet)] prior to the enactment of the amending by-law. To the eas

the temporary use would be adequately buffered from residential properties by existing co

development. The temporary use is adequately buffered from residential properties to the

is located behind the existing Falcon Hotel building and set back in excess of 80 m (262.4

Falconbridge Highway.

Subject to the requirement for fencing along the R2-2 zone boundary, staff are satisfied th

conflicts are envisioned should the temporary use be approved for a period of three years

Summary

Th l d tl b i d t t i i d t ti i t E l


11/167

storage and parking of construction and mining equipment in the rear of the subject lands

with Section 39 of the Planning Act for a temporary period of three years.


12/167

O'NEIL

FALC

ONBR

IDGE

EVA

PILOTT

E

LAWRENCE

RODNEY

M5

P FD

I

C2

OSP

FD

R2-2

R1-5

R2-2

R2-2

R2-2

R1-5

R1-5

R1

R2-2OSP

R3.D60

R1

-5

R2-2

C2

R3.D6

0

C1

6

9

5

68

19

55

22

50

60 37

58

20

29

24

26

2827

65

26

46

41

10

38

16

47

16

52

21

20

32

42

11

33

12

173183

241

435

218

529

229

184

195

200

451

253208

439

600

645

240

617489

713535295

211

519

207

215

647 623

248

501

648

643

445

256

611 609

291

186

228

3098

2938

29202956

30713079

2946

29622901

2850

2932

2968

3035

29832991

2836

30002992

2887

315

2974

3024

28692859

3144

3000

3098

3098309830983098

309830983098

3098

2902

2877

2925

3045

2908

2982

2851

2872

HEINO

ORELL

RAVINA

HERIN

E

VIEW

Growth and DeveloDepartment


13/167


14/167

Photo 1 EXISTING HOTEL AND RESTAURANT BUILDING

LOCATED ON THE SUBJECT LANDS AS VIEWEDFROM FALCONBRIDGE HIGHWAY LOOKING SOUT


15/167

Photo 3 HOTEL AND RESTAURANT AS VIEWED FROMSTORAGE AREA IN THE REAR PORTION OF THESUBJECT LANDS LOOKING NORTH TOFALCONBRIDGE HIGHWAY


16/167

Photo 5 VACANT RESIDENTIAL LANDS AND EXTRACTIVE

INDUSTRIAL LANDS TO THE EAST AND SOUTH OFTHE SUBJECT LANDS


17/167

Photo 7 EXISTING COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT TO THEEAST OF THE SUBJECT LANDS VIEWED FROMFALCONBRIDGE HIGHWAY LOOKING EAST


18/167


Application for rezoning in order to permit the use

of the property as a Contractor's Yard for the

storage of equipment and civil construction

material, 7275 & 7289 Estaire Road, Sudbury -Nolcar Corporation

Presented To: Plan

Presented: Mon

Report Date Tue

Type: Pub

File Number: 751

Recommendation

THAT the City of Greater Sudbury approve the application by

Nolcar Corporation to amend By-law 2010-100Z being the City ofGreater Sudbury Zoning By-law by changing the zoning

classification of lands described as PINs 73470-0196,

73470-0204, 73470-0301, Parcels 21422, 22947, and 37428

SES, Lot 5, Concession 2, Township of Dill from "C2", General

Commercial and "RU", Rural to "RU(S)", Rural Special subject to

the following conditions:

1. That the only permitted use shall be a contractor's yard.2. That prior to the enactment of the amending by-law the owner

shall enter into a Site Plan Control Agreement with the City,

which amongst other matters, shall address the screening of

outdoor storage areas and landscaping adjacent to Estaire Road.

STAFF REPORT

Applicant:

Nolcar Corporation

Signed By

Report Prepared By

Alex Singbush

Senior Planner


Reviewed By

Eric Taylor

Manager of Developm


Recommended by thPaul Baskcomb

Director of Planning S


Recommended by th

Bill Lautenbach


Development


Recommended by t

Doug Nadorozny

Chief Administrative O



19/167

Proposal:

The application proposes the use of the property as a Contractor's Yard for the storage o

civil construction material to support aggregate activity in the area. At this time no new b

proposed.


The subject property is designated as Rural in the Official Plan. Section 5.2.5 of the Offici

Industrial/Commercial, indicates that some limited rural industrial/commercial uses are pe

areas, particularly those activities that provide rural economic benefits that are balanced w

the natural environment and the agricultural resource base.

Policies related to rural industrial/commercial uses include:

1. Rural industrial/commercial uses are generally resource-based and may include agricu

industrial/commercial uses, and forestry.

2. Pits and quarries are permitted in appropriately zoned areas.

3. Rural industrial/commercial sites are to be located with adequate separation distances

areas, and provide proper buffering and landscaping along Arterial Road frontages. Entra

to Secondary Arterial and Local Roads, and no temporary structures, outside storage or s

be visible from the frontage of abutting roads. All such development is subject to rezoning

control.

4. New resource-related industries should not impact the natural resource base. Rural ind

uses must generate limited amounts of wastewater and minimize land use conflicts.

Planning Staff is satisfied the application conforms to the Official Plan and site plan contro


The subject property is comprised of three parcels located on the west side of Estaire Ro

Horseshoe Lake Road and Bruce Street, and was previously the site of the Stop 69 resta

station. Currently zoned "C2", General Commercial and "RU", Rural, the lands are approx

(9.0 ac.) in area with approximately 184 m (604 ft.) frontage on Estaire Road and a depth

198 m (650 ft.). A metal clad shop building and a Quonset hut occupy the property. The

site is wooded, a substantial area is cleared with a gravel surface, and there is a chain lin

along the Estaire Road frontage.

The property is bounded to the north, south and west by properties zoned "RU", Rural an

the opposite side of Estaire Road, by properties zoned "RU", Rural, "C2", General Comm

"RU(56)", Rural Special zoning that permits warehousing. There are quarries and gravel

the site is proximate to Tait Constructions main office on Bruce Street


20/167

buildings, septic systems, wells etc. within the permit control area, and prior to the placing

alterations.

2. New buildings, septic systems etc. must maintain a minimum setback of 14.0 metres fr

property line. Wells must maintain a minimum setback of 30.0 metres from the highway p

3. A MTO sign permit will be required prior to the placing of any signs visible from the hig

Building Services

Building Services requires the following:

1. A 3 m landscaped area abutting the road.

2. A 2.2 m high opaque fence is required around the storage area.

3. No shelving higher than 2.2 m is permitted.

4. It should be noted that the proposed future buildings would require adequate water for

purposes under the Ontario Building Code. The area is un-serviced therefore Ontario Fir

Standards would apply.


This site not currently serviced with municipal water and sanitary sewer.

We have no objection to changing the zoning classification from "C2", General Commerci

to "R(S)", Rural Special to permit the use of the property as a Contractor's yard for the sto

and civil construction material.

Roads and Transportation Services

Estaire Road is under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Transportation.

Public Consultation:

Given the minor nature of this application, a neighbourhood meeting was not recommend

of this report, no phone calls or correspondence regarding this proposal has been receive

Services Division.


Zoning By-law Conformity

The subject lands are to be rezoned from "C2", General Commercial and "RU", Rural to "

Special. The use of the property will remain consistent with the Zoning By-law standards

properties.

f


21/167

The proposed rezoning conforms to the Official Plan. Consistent with Official Plan policie

be subject to site plan control. This application for "RU(S)", Rural Special zoning to allow

Yard is appropriate at this location and the Planning Services Division recommends that t

amend By-law 2010-100Z be approved.


22/167

ESTA

IRE

HORSESH

OELAKE

BIRCH

BRUCE

RU

RU

M5(13)

C2

C2

C2

RU(56)

RU(23)

6

68

26

27

24

65

40

91

24

83

31

46

66

53

264

138

393

157

407

181

153

112184

210

312

160

145

197

111

149

154

128

104

131

163

146

220

7289

7275

7302

7198

7198

7199

7274

7198

7198

7199

7199

T Lake

ESTA

LAVOLA Growth and Develo

Department


23/167


24/167

Photos 1 SUBJECT LANDS 7275 AND 7289 ESTAIRE ROAD

VIEWED LOOKING SOUTHWEST FROM ESTAIREROAD


25/167

Photo 3 7278 AND 7302 A ESTAIRE ROAD, EAST OF THE

SUBJECT LANDS VIEWED LOOKING EAST FROMESTAIRE ROAD


26/167


Applications for Official Plan Amendment and

rezoning in order to permit a new elementary

school, Frood Road, Sudbury - Sudbury Catholic

District School Board

Presented To: Plannin

Presented: Monda

Report Date Tuesd

Type: Public

File Number: 701-6/

751-6/

Recommendation

Recommendation #1:

THAT the City of Greater Sudbury approve the application by theSudbury Catholic District School Board to amend the City of

Greater Sudbury Official Plan by changing the land use

designation from Parks & Open Space to Institutional on those

lands described as Part of PIN 02179-0004, Part of Parcel 27

S.E.S., in Lot 7, Concession 4, Township of McKim.

Recommendation #2:

THAT the City of Greater Sudbury approve the application by the

Sudbury Catholic District School Board to amend Zoning By-law

2010-100Z by changing the zoning classification from "OSP",

Open Space Private to "I", Institutional on those lands described

as Part of PIN 02179-0004, Part of Parcel 27 S.E.S., in Lot 7,

Concession 4, Township of McKim subject to the following

conditions:

a. That the owner provide the Development Approvals Section

with a registered survey plan outlining the lands to be rezoned to

enable the preparation of an amending zoning by-law;

b. That prior to the issuance of a building permit, the owner shall

enter into a Site Plan Control Agreement with the City which

Signed By

Report Prepared ByMauro Manzon

Senior Planner


Reviewed By

Eric Taylor

Manager of Developm


Recommended by thPaul Baskcomb



Recommended by th

Bill Lautenbach


Development


Recommended by tDoug Nadorozny




27/167

iv) The owner shall extend the existing sidewalk on the west side of Frood Road from Vic

south limit of the subject property; and,

v) The owner shall agree to transfer to the City a 5 metre strip of property along the entire

Road upon demand, if and when required for future road improvements, free of mortgageother encumbrances securing financing. The City shall be responsible for all survey and le

associated with this transfer.

STAFF REPORT

Applicant:

Sudbury Catholic District School Board (Agent: YB Architecture)

Location:

Part of PIN 02179-0004, Part of Parcel 27 S.E.S., in Lot 7, Concession 4, Township of M

Sudbury)

Applications:

1. To amend the City of Greater Sudbury Official Plan from Parks & Open Space to Inst

2. To amend By-law 2010-100Z being the City of Greater Sudbury Zoning By-law from "

Private to "I", Institutional.

Proposal:

Site specific applications for Official Plan Amendment and rezoning in order to permit a ne

school (St. David School). The proposed school will have a floor area of 2 600 m2 (27,98height of 1 to 2 storeys (maximum 8 metres). A section of the community trail would be re

accommodate development.


The proposal does not conform to the Official Plan. The subject property is designated as

Space, which does not permit institutional uses. A site specific amendment to the Official

required.

The lands were previously subject to land reclamation, and are therefore subject to the fo

under Section 9.4 of the Official Plan:

1. It is policy of this Plan to support the continued reclamation of land that was severely im

mining activities.


28/167

4. In order to protect and improve the urban tree canopy, applications for subdivision or s

may require a landscape plan. The plans will include the following:

a) a description of how natural vegetation is being retained as much as possible;

b) the identification of trees or stands to be retained;

c) measures to protect trees to be retained during and after construction;

d) a description of vegetation and trees to be removed and replacement strategy and me

e) a detailed planting plan to illustrate proposed replacement strategy and measures for

including trees; and,

f) the use of native species wherever possible.


The subject property is located on the west side of Frood Road, north of Dupont Street. T

serviced by municipal sewer and water services, which would have to be extended to the

Road is designated as a Collector Road, with ultimate right-of-way widths of 30 and 36 m

north of Shevchenko Street respectively). Currently there is a sidewalk on the east side o

The land subject to this rezoning proposal comprises part of a large City-owned parcel tha

subject to extensive land reclamation, including the planting of thousands of trees and for

Total site area of the land to be rezoned is 5.2 ha (12.9 acres), with 250 m (820 ft.) of fron

of approximately 228 m (748 ft.).

A maturing pine forest forms the easterly portion of the site where it abuts Frood Road. T

community trail is located at the southeast corner of the property. The trail runs adjacent t

drains a large marsh area. A smaller wetland feature is found in the southeast section of

attached map outlines the boundaries of the upper and lower wetland areas.

A rocky hilltop feature extends across the northerly portion of the property. Based on info

the Vegetation Enhancement Technical Advisory Committee (VETAC), the regreened po

adjacent to the marsh and stream are viewed as some of the best

examples of land reclamation and recovery in the City.

Lands abutting to the north are owned by MCTV and Vale. City-owned lands designated a

Space abut to the west and south. Established residential areas are located further to the

Frood Road.

Departmental & Agency Comments:



29/167

While we have no objection to the proposed use of the subject property, we are concerne

accessibility and safety for children who will walk to the school. We require that the follow

included as part of any approval:

1) That the owner undertake a Traffic Impact Study to review pedestrian crossing safety determine if any road improvements are required. The study should also review school bu

circulation, as well as parent and staff parking facilities. Further, that the owner agrees to

cost of any improvements identified in the study to the satisfaction of the General Manage

Services.

2) That the owner extend the existing sidewalk on the west side of Frood Road from Vict

south limit of the subject property, a distance of approximately 100 metres.

3) The owner understands and agrees to transfer to the City a 5 metre strip of property afrontage of Frood Road upon demand, if and when required for future road improvements

mortgages, trust deeds and other encumbrances securing financing. The City shall be re

survey and legal costs associated with this transfer.

Drainage Section

No concerns.

Environmental Planning Initiatives

There are two environmentally related issues associated with the above-noted application

1. Wetlands

Two wetlands are present on the subject property as shown on the attached figure along

watercourse that eventually drains into a culvert under Frood Road. A watershed or subw

not been prepared for the area containing the subject property.Policy 3 in Section 9.2.3 of the City's Official Plan states:

"3. In areas without a watershed or subwatershed plan, development and site alteration a

a wetland unless it can be demonstrated that there will be no impacts to the quality and q

water features that are hydrologically linked to the wetland and that losses of significant w

and functions will not occur."

2. Tree Canopy Cover

Thousands of tree seedlings were planted on and adjacent to the subject property by the

Program since 1984. The table below lists the tree species planted specifically on the sub

intent of the Regreening Program is to improve the quality of Greater Sudbury's terrestria

by so doing, improve the health of the City's watersheds and urban and rural environmen


30/167

1997 Red Pine 500

Jack Pine 450

1998 Eastern White Cedar 350

White Pine 240

Black Spruce 130

White Spruce 130

1999 Jack Pine 2600

Policies in Section 9.4.2 of the City's Official Plan state:

"2. New development, redevelopment, and municipal infrastructure works on previously re

required to mitigate any impacts to existing soil and vegetation. Where mitigation through

possible, onsite soil erosion shall be prevented and all vegetation removed shall be replac

appropriate and adequate site landscaping and/or land reclamation measures.

3. New development, redevelopment, and municipal infrastructure works on land in need

be required to reclaim the soil and vegetation onsite to a level equal to or greater than wo

through the City's Land Reclamation Program.4. In order to protect and improve the urban tree canopy, applications for subdivision or s

may require a landscape plan. The plans will include the following:

a. A description of how natural vegetation is being retained as much as possible;

b. The identification of trees or stands to be retained;

c. Measures to protect trees to be retained during and after construction;

d. A description of vegetation and trees to be removed and replacement strategy and me

e. A detailed planting plan to illustrate proposed replacement strategy and measures for

including trees; and,

f. The use of native species wherever possible.

It is recommended that this application be required to develop a landscape plan containin

outlined above.

Neighbourhood Consultation:

The proponents conducted pre-consultation with City staff and VETAC prior to the lands b

surplus. In addition, a neighbourhood meeting was conducted on October 2, 2012 beginn


31/167

Community Improvement Plan.

On June 11, 2012, Planning Committee recommended that the subject lands be declared

accommodate the new school. It was further recommended that the proponents work with

Green Space Advisory Panel to ensure preservation of reclaimed areas to the extent pos

recommendation was ratified by Council on June 26, 2012.


Council has declared a portion of the lands surplus in order to accommodate the propose

use conflicts are anticipated with adjacent uses given the nature of the site, as the propos

situated on a large parcel surrounded by green space. The key issues concerning this ap

the following:

integrating the development within the natural setting in order to protect historical land r

including maintaining public access; and,

infrastructure improvements required to service the new elementary school.

Preservation of green space

The lands are being conveyed with the expectation that the proponents will make every e

enhance the successful work towards regreening and recovery. The preliminary land use

by YB Architecture indicates that special consideration has been extended to integrating t

onto the property. Indeed it is the intent to make the unique setting and history of the recl

integral component of the design and curriculum of the new school. It is on this basis that

the conveyance of a much-valued site.

Some key elements of the proposed design are highlighted as follows:

The reforested area situated along the road corridor shall be maintained with the except

driveway entrance;

Although a section of the trail will have to be realigned in order to accommodate develop

access to the community trail and adjacent City-owned green space will be maintained;

The majority of the site will be left in its natural state;

There will be no encroachment into wetland areas, which are integrated into the develop

The natural drainage course shall be maintained;

The Site Plan Control Agreement can be utilized to address site alteration during the co

including such matters as siltation control and rock removal.

In order to ensure the implementation of the above noted elements, a landscape plan is r

condition of approval, consistent with Official Plan policies. The submission of a landscap


32/167


33/167

FROOD

BES

SIE

S

MONTAGUE

DUPO

NT

NADIA

SHEVCHENKO

UN

NA

ME

D

LAN

E10

0

U NN

AM

ED

LAN

E10

1

M4

OSP

M1(16)

I

R2-2

P

OSC

I(22)

R2-3

R2

-3

R2

-3

R2-3

R

R2-3

R2-3

R2

-2

R1-5

R2

-3

R1-5

R2

-3

R3

R2-3 R2-3

R2-3

R2-3

R3

R2-3(3)

61

57

6

4755

84

59

58 50

9183

90

699

833

140

515

465

487

491

40043

514

488

468

485476

445

42

438

488

392

350

149

445

42

468

520

473

408

129

53

441

477

340

530

464

424

502

421

536

462

439

52

43

492

144

45

433

474

448354

505

137

332

428

539

526

192

162

509

425

5

430

179

495

424 421

427

465

47

455

198

186

420

158

132

173

250485

168

462

440

445360

422

258

499

529

482

436

350

FROOD

LASALLE

OTREDAME

RIO



34/167

e

100


35/167

UpperW

etland

LowerWetland

Watercourse

Watercours

0

25

50

75

12.5

Metres

WetlandAreasandWatercourse

McKimCon.4,Lot7,PartofParcel27SES

751-6-12-024 Wetland areas 1/1 Page 35 of 167


36/167

Photo 1 FROOD ROAD, SUDBURY - TRAIL ENTRANCEON FROOD ROAD


37/167


38/167

Photo 5 FROOD ROAD, SUDBURY - REPLANTED FORESTUNDERSTORY


39/167

Photo 7 FROOD ROAD, SUDBURY - CREEK OUTLET FROMMARSH AREA


40/167

Photo 9 FROOD ROAD, SUDBURY - NORTHEASTERLY VIEWOF LARGER MARSH AREA


41/167

Photo 11 FROOD ROAD, SUDBURY - VIEW OF CREEKDRAINING SOUTHEASTERLY


42/167


Applications for rezoning and subdivision

approval in order to create a 163-lot subdivision

to be developed for single and double residential

uses, MacMillan Drive, Val Therese - 630411

Ontario Inc


Presented: Monda

Report Date Tuesd

Type: Public

File Number: 751-7/0

780-7/0

Recommendation

Recommendation #1:

That the City of Greater Sudbury approve the application by630411 Ontario Inc. to amend By-law 2010-100Z being the City

of Greater Sudbury Zoning By-law by changing the zoning

classification of lands described as PIN 73504-0952, Rem. of

Parcel 764 S.E.S., in Lot 6, Concession 1, Township of Hanmer

from "FD", Future Development to "R1-5", Low Density

Residential One and "R2-2", Low Density Residential Two

subject to the following conditions:

Signed By

Report Prepared ByMauro Manzon

Senior Planner


Reviewed By

Eric Taylor

Manager of Developm


Recommended by th

Paul Baskcomb



Recommended by th

Bill Lautenbach


Development


Recommended by tDoug Nadorozny




43/167

751-7-09-008 report 1/19 Page 43 of 167


44/167

751-7-09-008 report 2/19 Page 44 of 167


45/167

751-7-09-008 report 3/19 Page 45 of 167


46/167

751-7-09-008 report 4/19 Page 46 of 167


47/167

751-7-09-008 report 5/19 Page 47 of 167


48/167


49/167

751-7-09-008 report 7/19 Page 49 of 167


50/167

751-7-09-008 report 8/19 Page 50 of 167


51/167

751-7-09-008 report 9/19 Page 51 of 167


52/167

751-7-09-008 report 10/19 Page 52 of 167


53/167

751-7-09-008 report 11/19 Page 53 of 167


54/167

751-7-09-008 report 12/19 Page 54 of 167


55/167


56/167

751-7-09-008 report 14/19 Page 56 of 167


57/167


58/167


59/167

751-7-09-008 report 17/19 Page 59 of 167


60/167

751-7-09-008 report 18/19 Page 60 of 167


61/167

751-7-09-008 report 19/19 Page 61 of 167

R1-5P

R1

-5

5

R1-5

R1-5

R1-5

PR1-5

R2-2A

STREET

DRIVE

DIANE

ST

3976

3994

3969

3975

39873982 16531626

39603979

3941

3933

3960

3926

3988

39653964

3906 3934

3957

1673

39723934

3978

3947

3960

3951

3974

3980

3994

3930

3959

3934

3964

3942

3968

16353965

3977

39443942


62/167

RU

RU

FD

RU

RUFD

H30C2

R1-5

R1-5

RU

R1-5

P

P

R1-5

R1-1

R1

-5

R1-5

P

R

1-5

R

1-5

R1-5

R1-5

R1-5

R1-5

R1-5

R1-5

I(9)

R1-5

R1-5

R1-1.D

1

RU

R1-2

R1-5

I

RU

P

R1-5

R1-1

C2

C1

R2-2

R1-5

Whitson River

Whitson River

MUN

ICIPALROAD80(OLDHIGH

WAY69)ROAD

YORKSHIRE DRIVE

VELMA

MACMILLAN

D

JOHN STREET

CAROL STREET

MARK

STREET

CLAIRE

STREET

SWANSON

COURT

GEORGE STREET

HENRY COURT

RICHARD STREET

SUZANN

E

STREET

CECILE STREET

TREET

3366

1647

1833

1795

1736

1735

38423853

38493839

3834

1575

1568

1563

1714

3826

3810

3637

3904

3899

3622

1690

16371610

3825

17163903

3874

1745

3786

1696

1707

3856

3893

1643

1687

3873

3358

1634

1648

1645

3790

3803

3857

3912

3776

1697

1525

3926

3840

1633

1695

1624

3691

3593

1590

3819

3849

1700

3859

1664

3888

3663

3612

3689

1725

1688

3376

3834

3663

3674

3661

1724

3749

3867

3898

1576

3649

1559

3773

1592

1576

1564

3625

1630

3697

1623

3723

1699

1677

3904

16481702

3835

3789

3855

3370

3746

1629

3862

3800

1716

3722

17071818

1739

3612

3813

3905

1628

1702

1713

3838

1736

3662

3621

3788

3674

3843

3907

1607

3882

1712

1643

3720

1729

3623

3601

3893

1750

3352

1668

3886

3851

1710

3713

1730

3875

1733

3685

3601

3910

3612

1667

3795

3432

3885

3808

1700

3915

3826

3868

1533

3766

1743

3653

3711

1648

1656

3682

3661

3480

3394

1597

1545

3890

3846

3571

3673

1635

3664

3613

3673

1644

3687

3858

1777

176217801810

DOMINION DRIVE

WAY69)ROAD

VELMAS

WILFRED STREET

Growth and Develo

Department


63/167

LILLIANSTREET

ROSE COURT

HERI TAG E

DRIVE

CHELSEAA

VEN

UE

LAROCQUEA

VEN

UE

EUGENE STREET

MIRAGEB

OU

LE

VARD

CLASSIC

PA

RKWA

Y

CONCORDESTREET

Community Boundary

Lakes

Subject Property

Road

Schedule 1c excerptLand Use Designations


64/167

Subject Pro

OMB

MUNICIPALROAD80(OL

DHIGHWAY69)ROAD

YORKSHIRE DRIVE

VELMASTREET

MACMILLAN

DRIVE

CLARENCESTREET

JOHN STREET

CAROL STREET

MAR

K

STREET

CLAIR

ESTREET

SWANSONCOURT

GEORGE STREET

HENRY COURT

RICHARD STREET

SUZAN

NESTREET

NORMAN CRESCENT

CHARLES COURT

HAROLDCRESCENT

CECILE STREET

WAYNECRESCENT

HARRY STREET

DIANE

STREET

SADDLECR

EEK

DRIVE

JOSEPHINE DRIVE

SANDRA COURT

CLakes

Land Use

Living Area 1

Mixed Use Commercial

Parks & Open Space

Urban Expansion Reserve

Agricultural Reserve

Rural


65/167

751-7-09-008 Housing Model 1/2 Page 65 of 167


66/167

751-7-09-008 Housing Model 2/2 Page 66 of 167


67/167

Photo 1 MACMILLAN DRIVE, VAL THERESE - NORTHERLY

VIEW OF MACMILLAN DRIVE


68/167

Photo 3 MACMILLAN DRIVE, VAL THERESE - WATERCOUR

SOUTH OF MACMILLAN DRIVE


69/167

Photo 5 MACMILLAN DRIVE, VAL THERESE - TYPICALVEGETATION


70/167

Photo 7 MACMILLAN DRIVE, VAL THERESE - VIEW OF

NORTHERLY PART OF PROPERTY


71/167

Photo 9 MACMILLAN DRIVE, VAL THERESENORTHWESTERLY VIEW TOWARDSCAMPEAU STREET


72/167


73/167

751-7-09-008 letters of concern 1/21 Page 73 of 167


74/167



75/167



76/167



77/167



78/167



79/167



80/167



81/167



82/167


83/167



84/167



85/167


86/167



87/167



88/167



89/167



90/167



91/167



92/167



93/167




P t d M d


94/167


Consent referral request for Consent Applications

B92/2012 to B94/2012, 5174 Desmarais Road,

Hanmer - Diane & Marcel Boulais

Presented: Monda

Report Date Tuesd

Type: Routin

Report

Recommendation

THAT the City of Greater Sudbury permit Consent Applications

B0092/2012, B0093/2012 and B0094/2012 on those lands

described as PIN 73506-0122, Parcel 951, Lot 6, Concession 4,

Township of Hanmer, to proceed by way of the consent process.

STAFF REPORT

Applicant:

Marcel & Diane Boulais

Location:

PIN 73506-0122, Parcel 951, Lot 6, Concession 4, Township of

Hanmer (5174 Desmarais Road, Hanmer)

Application:

In accordance with Section 20.4.1 of the Official Plan, the

Consent Official has referred the subject application for consent

to the Planning Committee in order to determine whether the

applications should be permitted to proceed by way of the

consent process or alternatively if a plan of subdivision is

required.

Signed By

Report Prepared By

Glen Ferguson

Senior Planner

Digitally Signed Oct 1Reviewed By

Eric Taylor

Manager of Developm


Recommended by th

Paul Baskcomb



Recommended by th

Bill Lautenbach


Development


Recommended by t

Doug Nadorozny




95/167

process as the preferred method for lot creation in this case. It is on this basis therefore th

recommends that it would appropriate for the proposed new lots to proceed by way of the


96/167


97/167

COA - boulais 1/2 Page 97 of 167


98/167



Presented: Monda


99/167

Request to rescind Deeming By-law 91-18,

Subdivision M-1003, Scenic View, Lot 10,

Concession 3, Township of Neelon Zulich

Enterprises Limited

Report Date Tuesd

Type: Routin

Report

File Number: 780-6/

Recommendation

THAT the City of Greater Sudbury approve the request by Zulich

Enterprises Limited to rescind Deeming By-law 91-18 on the

lands described as Subdivision M-1003, Lots 25 to 32, 45 to 69,

and 74 to 106, 110 to 130, and Lot 133, Lot 10, Concession 3,Township of Neelon subject to the following conditions:

1. That prior to the rescinding of the deeming by-law the applicant

shall enter into a development agreement(s) with the City of

Greater Sudbury, addressing the provision of infrastructure and

other improvements, for each phase of the development of the

lots to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Growth and

Development.

2. That the owner finalize the Tranplan October 2012 Traffic

Impact Study and agree to participate in the cost of any upgrades

or improvements including the owner to be responsible for the

construction of a sidewalk on the existing section of Birmingham

Drive between Dorsett Drive and Bancroft Drive to the

satisfaction of the General Manager of Infrastructure Services.

3. Prior to the submission of servicing plans, the owner shall, to

the satisfaction of the Director of Planning Services, provide an

updated geotechnical report prepared, signed, sealed, and dated

by a geotechnical engineer licensed in the Province of Ontario

Signed By

Report Prepared By

Alex Singbush

Senior Planner


Reviewed By

Eric Taylor

Manager of Developm


Recommended by th

Paul Baskcomb

Director of Planning SDigitally Signed Oct 1

Recommended by th

Bill Lautenbach


Development


Recommended by t

Doug Nadorozny

Chief Administrative ODigitally Signed Oct 1

The geotechnical information on building foundations shall be to the satisfaction of the Ch

and Director of Planning Services.

4. All streets will be constructed to an urban standard, including the required curbs and gu

5. The owner shall provide a detailed lot grading plan prepared, signed, sealed, and date

civil engineer with a valid certificate of authorization for the proposed lots as part of the su

servicing plans. This plan must show finished grades around new houses, retaining walls

swales slopes and lot corners The plan must show sufficient grades on boundary proper


100/167

swales, slopes and lot corners. The plan must show sufficient grades on boundary proper

lot grading of the new site to existing properties and show the stormwater overland flow p

6. The owner agrees to provide the required soils report, water, sanitary sewer and lot gra

planning reports and plans to the Director of Planning Services prior to the submission of

any phase of the subdivision.

7. The owner shall develop a siltation control plan for the subdivision construction period tof the Director of Planning Services, Nickel District Conservation Authority and Fisheries

Canada.

8. Any streetlights required for this subdivision will be designed and constructed by Great

Plus Inc. at the cost of the owner.

9. As part of the submission of servicing plans, the owner shall have rear yard slope treat

a geotechnical engineer licensed in the Province of Ontario incorporated into the lot gradi

as required at locations required by the Director of Planning Services. Suitable provisionsincorporated into the Development Agreement to ensure that the treatment is undertaken

of the Director of Planning Services.

10. The owner shall provide a utilities servicing plan showing the location of all utilities inc

services, Greater Sudbury Hydro Plus or Hydro One, Bell, Union Gas, Canada Post and P

must be to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning Services and must be provided prio

any individual phase.

11. The owner shall provide proof of sufficient fire flow in conjunction with the submission

drawings for each phase of construction. All costs associated with upgrading the existing

to service this subdivision will be bourne totally by the owner.

12. The owner shall provide proof of sufficient sanitary sewer capacity in conjunction with

construction drawings for each phase of construction. All costs associated with upgrading

collection system and/or sewage lift stations to service this subdivision will be bourne tota

Any and all development charges associated with the sanitary sewer flow directed to the Station must be paid at the time of the owner entering into the development agreement fo

of the effected lots.

13. The subject phase to be developed will be required to provide a cash contribution in l


101/167

in situations where the conditions of the subdivision agreement have not been met

of registration.

The Official Plan language is similar to Subsection 4 of Section 50 of the Planning Act wh

The council of a local municipality may by by-law designate any plan of subdivision

that has been registered for eight years or more, which shall be deemed not to be

subdivision for the purposes of subsection (3). R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, s. 50 (4).


102/167

A by-law deeming a plan of subdivision not to be a plan of subdivision only affects the co

and does not void or expunge the plan of subdivision.

In accordance with Section 11.11 of the Regional Official Plan, the Region had a policy th

all plans of subdivision, or significant portions thereof, which had been registered for eigh

developed. In 1991 Planning Committee deemed a number of subdivisions, for a variety

goal being that new subdivision agreements would be registered against the lands.

By-law 91-18 enacted by the Regional Municipality of Sudbury on January 30, 1991 deem

the Scenic View subdivision not registered for the purposes of Section 50(3) of the Plann

to the Planning Committee of the Regional Municipality of Sudbury dated January 17, 199

a number of subdivisions, indicates the following with respect to the Scenic View Subdivis

M-1003 Scenic View Subdivision - Registered February 18th, 1975, City of Sudbury

subdivision has been developed. The balance of the subdivision (Lots 25 to 32, 45

110 to 130 and 133) is under the name of Sudvenco Corporation Limited. They wethe Engineering Department in 1989 about developing the next phase of this subdi

has been heard since. No property has been transferred out of this subdivision sinc

charges on title and a Ministry of Revenue Notice of Lien on title to the property.

Staff also understands that, at the time the by-law was enacted, there were concerns with

the Levesque St. sanitary sewer lift pump. The Levesque Street lift station has since been

capacity is no longer an issue for sanitary flow.

The subdivision is currently zoned with mix of "R2-2", Low Density Residential Two, lots 1

applicants proposed first phase), and "R1-5", Low Density Residential One, lots 25 to 32,

to 106, and Lot 133 (the applicants subsequent phases). All of the lots meet the minimu

and depth standards for their respective zones in accordance with By-law 2010-100Z, the

Sudbury Zoning By-law.

A Traffic Impact study dated October 2012 was prepared by Tranplan in support of the ow

rescind the deeming by-law. Roads and Transportation Services comments on the impac

provided later in this report.

Development Engineering has advised that servicing, grading, and related improvements

and shall be designed to the Citys current engineering standards and requirements.

and Dorsett Drive to the east. Additionally, 150 mm diameter water main is available at C

and Cambridge Crescent. A fire flow analysis indicates that the subdivision lands meet th

standard of 75 litres per second and the required maximum hour and maximum day press

existing system.

There is currently a sanitary sewer collection system to the subject property. A 200 mm d

sewer exists at Birmingham Drive and Dorsett Drive to the west and a 200 mm diameter sexists at Nottingham Avenue and Dorsett Drive to the east. Additionally, 200 mm diamet

available at Covington Crescent Lots along Birmingham Drive will contribute sanitary se


103/167

available at Covington Crescent. Lots along Birmingham Drive will contribute sanitary se

gravity sanitary sewer system on Bancroft Drive flowing westerly to a Drop Shaft to the R

at MH 11-256 on Mildred Street. Properties on Covington Crescent, Cambridge Crescen

remainder of Nottingham Avenue will contribute sanitary sewage flow to the sanitary sewe

Bancroft Drive flowing easterly to the Levesque Lift Station. The Levesque Lift Station pu

system on Bancroft Drive directly north of Dorsett Drive. There is a development charge

all sanitary sewer flow directed to the Levesque Lift Station. This charge must be paid atowner entering into the development agreement for the development of any lots that outle

The Development Engineering Section will require an updated comprehensive geotechnic

Included in this report must be a detailed review of soils type including details regarding th

substandard soils and placement of engineered fill for the construction of homes. Also, th

include an analysis illustrating how the groundwater table will be lowered to a level that w

problems to adjacent boundary housing and will, in conjunction with the subdivision gradi

basements of new homes will not require extensive foundation drainage pumping. Detailregarding the installation of pipework within any substandard soils limits will also be a req

report. The geotechnical report and comments on infrastructure construction for this sub

submitted in conjunction with or prior to the submission of engineering drawings.

The City requires that all new streets be constructed including curbs, gutters, storm sewe

binder and surface courses. Sight triangles to City standards are to be provided at all co

The subject area is located in the Ramsey Watershed. The Citys Drainage Engineer pro

comments with regards to stormwater:

1) The subject phase to be developed will be required to provide a cash contribution in lie

stormwater management controls and will be required to contribute towards downstream

conveyance and stormwater management control improvements to be completed by the C

2) The major storm overland flow path is to be engineered and clearly identified to an acc

3) The owner is required to construct a stormwater system to inlet stormwater from the re

phase of the development to the existing storm sewer on Dorsett Drive.

The following conditions apply with respect to lifting the deeming by-law:

1) P i t th b i i f i i l th h ll t th ti f ti f th Di

illustrating how the groundwater table will be lowered to a level that will

not cause problems to adjacent boundary housing and will, in conjunction with the subdiv

show that basements of new homes will not require extensive foundation drainage pumpi

geotechnical information on building foundations shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief B

Director of Planning Services.

2) All streets will be constructed to an urban standard, including the required curbs and g3) The owner shall provide a detailed lot grading plan prepared, signed, sealed, and date


104/167

) p g g p p p g

professional civil engineer with a valid certificate of authorization for the proposed lots as

submission of servicing plans. This plan must show finished grades around new houses,

sideyards, swales, slopes and lot corners. The plan must show sufficient grades on boun

mesh the lot grading of the new site to existing properties and show the stormwater overla

4) The owner agrees to provide the required soils report, water, sanitary sewer and lot gra

planning reports and plans to the Director of Planning Services prior to the submission of any phase of the subdivision.

5) The owner shall develop a siltation control plan for the subdivision construction period

of the Director of Planning Services, Nickel District Conservation Authority and Fisheries

Canada.

6) Any streetlights required for this subdivision will be designed and constructed by Great

Plus Inc. at the cost of the owner.7) As part of the submission of servicing plans, the owner shall have rear yard slope treat

a geotechnical engineer licensed in the Province of Ontario incorporated into the lot gradi

as required at locations required by the Director of Planning Services. Suitable provision

incorporated into the Development Agreement to ensure that the treatment is undertaken

of the Director of Planning Services.

8) The owner shall provide a utilities servicing plan showing the location of all utilities incl

Greater Sudbury Hydro Plus or Hydro One, Bell, Union Gas, Canada Post and Persona. to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning Services and must be provided prior to cons

individual phase.

9) The owner shall provide proof of sufficient fire flow in conjunction with the submission o

drawings for each phase of construction. All costs associated with upgrading the existing

system to service this subdivision will be bourne totally by the owner.

10) The owner shall provide proof of sufficient sanitary sewer capacity in conjunction with

construction drawings for each phase of construction. All costs associated with upgradin

collection system and/or sewage lift stations to service this subdivision will be bourne tota

Any and all development charges associated with the sanitary sewer flow directed to the

St ti t b id t th ti f th t i i t th d l t t f

Roads and Transportation

We have completed our review of the October 2012 Tranplan traffic impact study and agr

recommendation that no mitigation measures or road improvements are required to suppo

development. As a condition of approval, we do recommend that the owner be responsib

sidewalk on the existing section of Birmingham Drive between Dorsett Drive and Bancrof

Operations


105/167

No concerns.

Building Services

1. The property shall require a development agreement and during that process, based o

quantities of removal of rock through blasting, the following conditions will be imposed:

a. The developer will be required to provide a geotechnical report on how the work relate

be undertaken safely to protect adjoining structures and other infrastructure. The geotec

be undertaken by a blasting consultant defined as a professional engineer licensed in the

Ontario with a minimum of five (5) years experience related to blasting.

b. The blasting consultant shall be retained by the developer and shall be independent o

any subcontractor doing blasting work. The blasting consultant shall be required to comp

monitoring recommended in his report of vibration levels and provide a report detailing th

vibration levels. Copies of the recorded ground vibration documents shall be provided to

contract administration weekly or upon request for this specific project.

c. The geotechnical report will provide recommendations and specifications on the follow

minimum but not limited to:

- Pre-blast survey of surface structures and infrastructure within affected area

- Trial blast activities

- Procedures during blasting

- Procedures for addressing blasting damage complaints

- Blast notification mechanism to adjoining residences

- Structural stability of exposed rock faces

d. The above report shall be submitted for review to the satisfaction of the Chief Building

commencement of any removal of rock by blasting.

e. Should the developers schedule require to commence blasting and rock removal prior

development agreement having been signed, a site alteration permit shall be required und

execution of development agreement(s) with the City of Greater Sudbury, addressing the

infrastructure and other improvements, to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Grow

Development along with specific reports and plans required in order to permit the constru

and the development of the lots.


106/167

SHEL

BOUR

NE

PRES

COTT

FOURTH

OD

ALLIS

TON

R1-5

R1-5

R2-2

R1-5

R2-2

R2-2

R2-2

PR1-5

R2-2

C1

R2-2

R2-2(8)

R2-2R1-5

1

7 3 2

2

7

7

8

2

7

8

7

866

14

56

26

38

78

38

83

25

32

35

41

13

84

25

21

38

62

61

71

47

14

11

14

31

13

38

29

31

70

20

25

19

26

50

30

15

32

89 93

38

10

44

30 55

44

77

50 50

38

145

345

133

356

139

351

165

157

151

2600

2400

2590

2482

2403

26142618

2610

2388

2333

2376

2538

2568

2371

2380

26222618

2444

26002450

2550

2400

2450 2622

2380


107/167

DORS

ETT

NAVANOD

BRENTWOO

BIRMIN

GH

AM

NOTTINGHAM

FD

R1-5

R1-5

R1-5

R1-5

I

R1-5

R2

-2R2

-2

R1

-5R1

-5

Ramsey Lake

Ramsey LakeRamsey Lake

18

19

3431

42

4239

19

1915

26

18

19

10

43

27

31

2323

13

19

122

2662

2349

2515

2650

2482

2663

2625

2560

2407

2347

2554

2537

2369

2548

25792571

2574

2433

2471

2631

2455

2403

2524

2619

2585

2531

2455

2614

2620

2482

2461

2596

2538

2610

2542

2644

2526

2654

2549

2550

2369

2397

2509

2455

2597

2614

2531

2568

2397

2461

2538

2604

2530

2585

2643

2578

2532

2555

2654

2614

2349

2487

2631

2605

2471

2555

2551

26182472

2600

2332

24512590

26182610

2523

2481

2551

2662

2551

2515

2584

2326

2411

2481

2600

2407

2

2632

2626

2507

2347

2600

2373

2620

2643

2600

2524

2579

2450

2505

2487

2622

BANCROFT

SECON

D

KINGSWAY

TH L

IGHT

RHEAL

THIRD

QUE

HEBERT

RAYMOND

OUNT

RITA E



108/167

780-6-73-12 zulich letter 1/1 Page 108 of 167


109/167

780-6-73-12 by-law 1/4 Page 109 of 167


110/167

780-6-73-12 by-law 2/4 Page 110 of 167


111/167

780-6-73-12 by-law 3/4 Page 111 of 167


112/167

780-6-73-12 by-law 4/4 Page 112 of 167

For Information Only

Draft Provincial Policy Statement Review


Presented: Monda

Report Date Tuesd


113/167

a t o c a o cy State e t e e p

Type: Corres

Inform

Recommendation

For the information of Planning Committee

Background

The Province of Ontario recently released a draft of a revised

Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) and is seeking comments from

various stakeholders. The PPS is issued under the Planning Act

and is the statement of the Provinces policies concerning land

use planning. The PPS provides policy direction for the entire

province on matters of provincial interest in land use planning

and development.

Implementation of the PPS is set out through the Planning Act,

which requires that decisions on land use planning matters made

by municipalities, the Province, the Ontario Municipal Board and

other decision-makers shall be consistent with the PPS.

Municipalities are the prime implementers of the PPS through

policies in their municipal official plans and through decisions on

other planning matters.

The Planning Act requires that the PPS be reviewed every five

years to determine whether revisions are needed. The five-year

review of the PPS commenced in March 1, 2010 and since then

th P i h d t d lt ti O t i ith b f th

Signed By

Report Prepared By

Kris Longston

Senior Planner


Reviewed By

Mark Simeoni

Manager of Commun

Planning


Recommended by th

Paul Baskcomb



Recommended by th

Bill Lautenbach


Development


Recommended by t

Doug Nadorozny



The purpose of this report is to provide Planning Committee with a general overview of th

changes to the PPS, focusing on any that may have an impact on land use planning prac

Sudbury and to discuss the next steps with respect to providing comments to the Provinc

PPS. Attached to the Report is a copy of the draft PPS.

Proposed PPS Policy Changes

The Province has highlighted a number of changes to policies that it feels build upon the

framework in the 2005 PPS and are intended to provide stronger, clearer direction to sup


114/167

the Province. Some of the highlighted policy changes that may be of interest to the City a

Building Strong Healthy Communities by:

Recognizing the range and diversity of settlement areas across Ontario

Recognizing that all areas experience land use change but not necessarily growth

Clarifying that the requirements to support small expansions of settlements may b

for large expansions

Allowing limited use of septic tanks and wells for minor infill development and rou

unserviced settlement areas

Recognizing Aboriginal interests

Encouraging planning authorities to coordinate planning with Aboriginal communi

appropriate

Acknowledging that the PPS is to be implemented in a manner consistent with Ab

rights in the Constitution Act, 1982

Encouraging coordination of emergency management with other planning conside

Recognizing the importance of parks and recreation, green spaces, trails and trai

Requiring the consideration of potential impacts of climate change adaptation and

Encouraging green infrastructure and strengthening stormwater management req

Directing development away from areas of high to extreme risk of wildland fire un

mitigated

Clarifying that planning for infrastructure can go beyond the 20 year time horizon

Supporting long-term planning for employment areas

Supporting the adaptive re-use of infrastructure

Requiring consideration of the life-cycle cost of infrastructure

Permitting additional uses on farms and providing flexibility for agricultural-related


115/167

Requiring agricultural areas to be designated in municipal official plans and impac

development surrounding agricultural operations to be mitigated

Protecting the Environment and Resources by:

Requiring identification of shoreline areas

Requiring the identification of natural heritage systems in southern Ontario

Refining the area of protection for significant woodlands and valleylands in southe

Promoting the conservation of cultural heritage and archaeological resources

Conclusion

As with the current PPS, the draft PPS is divided into different sections which focus on di

land use planning in Ontario. These sections are Building Strong Communities, Wise Use

of Resources, Protecting Public Health and Safety, Implementation and Interpretation, anDefinitions.

There are numerous changes proposed to the PPS from the current 2005 version. Some

are relatively minor clarification items, while others may have more of an impact on the C

report is a copy of the draft PPS that was released by the Province.

In order to better understand the proposed changes to the PPS and the potential impact t

land use planning in Greater Sudbury, Staff will be attending an upcoming PPS informatioput on by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing and will also be discussing the pro

with planning staff from other northern municipalities.

f f ff C


116/167

Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 1/52 Page 116 of 167


117/167



118/167



119/167


120/167

Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 5/52


121/167



122/167



123/167



124/167



125/167



126/167



127/167



128/167



129/167



130/167



131/167



132/167



133/167



134/167


135/167



136/167



137/167



138/167



139/167



140/167



141/167



142/167



143/167



144/167



145/167



146/167



147/167



148/167



149/167



150/167



151/167



152/167



153/167

Draft Provincial Policy Statement

oct 29 planning committee meeting

Documents