oatley station accessibility upgrade flora and fauna ... · tsc act the study area is considered...
TRANSCRIPT
© Biosis September 2012 – Leading ecology and heritage consultants 1
Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade
Flora and Fauna Assessment FINAL REPORT
Prepared for Transport for NSW
10 April 2014
© Biosis 2013 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting www.biosis.com.au i
Biosis Pty Ltd
This report (Flora and Fauna Impact Assessment Report) has been prepared by Biosis Pty Ltd
(Biosis) for Transport for NSW (TfNSW) and may be used and relied on by TfNSW. Preparation of
this Report is a requirement of the Professional Services Contract (PSC) between TfNSW and Biosis
in relation to Oatley Accessibility Upgrade (Project). In accordance with the PSC, this Report may be
used in whole or in part and relied on by TfNSW and subcontractors or sub-consultants of TfNSW
(Third Parties). With the exception of Third Parties, the contents of this Report are not to be used in
whole or in part, by or for the benefit of others without the express written permission of Biosis
Disclaimer:
Biosis Pty Ltd has completed this assessment in accordance with the relevant federal, state and
local legislation and current industry best practice. The company accepts no liability for any
damages or loss incurred as a result of reliance placed upon the report content or for any purpose
other than that for which it was intended.
Biosis offices
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
Canberra
Floor 1, Unit 3, 38 Essington Street
Mitchell ACT 2911
Phone: (02) 6241 2333
Fax: (03) 9646 9242
Email: [email protected]
NEW SOUTH WALES
Sydney
Unit 14, 17-27 Power Avenue
Alexandria NSW 2015
Phone: (02) 9690 2777
Fax: (02) 9690 2577
Email: [email protected]
Wollongong
8 Tate Street
Wollongong NSW 2500
Phone: (02) 4229 5222
Fax: (02) 4229 5500
Email: [email protected]
QUEENSLAND
Brisbane
Suite 4 First Floor, 72 Wickham Street
Fortitude Valley QLD 4006
Phone: (07) 3831 7400
Fax: (07) 3831 7411
Email: [email protected]
VICTORIA
Ballarat
506 Macarthur Street
Ballarat VIC 3350
Phone: (03) 5331 7000
Fax: (03) 5331 7033
Email: [email protected]
Melbourne (Head Office)
38 Bertie Street
Port Melbourne VIC 3207
Phone: (03) 9646 9499
Fax: (03) 9646 9242
Email: [email protected]
Wangaratta
16 Templeton Street
Wangaratta VIC 3677
Phone: (03) 5721 9453
Fax: (03) 5721 9454
Email: [email protected]
Document information
Report to: Transport for NSW
Prepared by: Ed Cooper
Alexandra Cave
Biosis project no.: 17612
File name: 17612.Oatley.Station.Upgrade.TFFA.FIN03.20140410.docx
Citation: Biosis (2014). Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and
Fauna Assessment. Report for Transport for NSW. Authors: E Cooper & A
Cave, Biosis Pty Ltd, Sydney Office. Project no. 17612
Document control
Version Internal reviewer Date issued
Draft version 01 Nathan Garvey 29/01/2014
Final version 01 Nathan Garvey 26/02/2014
Final version 02 Nathan Garvey 18/03/2014
Final version 03 Nathan Garvey 10/04/2014
Acknowledgements
Biosis acknowledges the contribution of the following people and
organisations in undertaking this study:
Adam Hooley (Transport for NSW)
Catherine Barlow (Transport for NSW)
Office of Environment and Heritage for access to the Atlas
of NSW Wildlife
The following Biosis staff were involved in this project:
James Shepherd for mapping
Nathan Garvey for quality assurance
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting II
Contents
Summary ................................................................................................................................................................ vi
1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Project background ...................................................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Scope of assessment ................................................................................................................................................... 1
1.3 Location of the study area .......................................................................................................................................... 1
2. Methods ........................................................................................................................................................ 4
2.1 Nomenclature ............................................................................................................................................................... 4
2.2 Literature and database review ................................................................................................................................ 4
2.3 Site investigation ........................................................................................................................................................... 5
2.3.1 Flora assessment .............................................................................................................................................. 5
2.3.2 Fauna assessment ............................................................................................................................................ 5
2.3.3 Permits and Licenses ....................................................................................................................................... 6
2.4 Survey limitations ......................................................................................................................................................... 6
2.5 Legislation and policy .................................................................................................................................................. 6
2.6 Mapping .......................................................................................................................................................................... 6
3. Results ........................................................................................................................................................... 8
3.1 Ecological Results ......................................................................................................................................................... 8
3.2 Site context and connectivity ..................................................................................................................................... 8
3.3 Vegetation and fauna habitat .................................................................................................................................... 8
3.4 Threatened flora, fauna and ecological communities ...................................................................................... 15
3.4.1 Threatened species ....................................................................................................................................... 15
3.4.2 Threatened ecological communities ......................................................................................................... 15
3.5 Noxious weeds ........................................................................................................................................................... 16
4. Potential impacts and recommended mitigation measures ............................................................ 21
4.1 Potential impacts ....................................................................................................................................................... 21
4.1.1 Direct impacts ................................................................................................................................................. 21
4.1.2 Indirect impacts.............................................................................................................................................. 21
4.2 Recommended mitigation measures ................................................................................................................... 24
5. 4. Biodiversity Legislation and Government Policy ............................................................................. 28
5.1 Commonwealth ......................................................................................................................................................... 28
5.1.1 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, 1999 .................................................... 28
5.2 State .............................................................................................................................................................................. 29
5.2.1 Threatened Species Conservation Act, 1995 ........................................................................................... 29
5.2.2 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 ............................................................................. 30
5.2.3 Native Vegetation Act, 2003 ........................................................................................................................ 31
5.2.4 Noxious Weeds Act 1993 ............................................................................................................................. 31
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting III
6. Conclusion .................................................................................................................................................. 33
References ............................................................................................................................................................. 34
Appendices ............................................................................................................................................................ 35
Appendix 1: Flora .................................................................................................................................................. 36
Appendix 2: Fauna ................................................................................................................................................ 55
Appendix 3: Tree removal ................................................................................................................................... 76
List of Figures
Figure 1: Location of the study area, Oatley, NSW ............................................................................................. 3
Figure 2: Vegetation Communities and Fauna Habitat Features of the Study Area .................................... 18
Figure 3: Threatened flora within 5 km of the study area ............................................................................... 19
Figure 4: Threatened fauna within 5 km of the study area ............................................................................. 20
Figure 5: Potential Construction Compound Locations ................................................................................... 26
Figure 6: Trees to be removed ............................................................................................................................ 27
List of Tables
Table 1: Database searches completed for the report ...................................................................................... 4
Table 2: Vegetation Community Description – Degraded hinterland sandstone gully forest ...................... 9
Table 3: Vegetation Community Description – Mown Exotic Grasses and ornamental plantings ............. 11
Table 4: Vegetation Community Description – Modified eucalypt woodland ............................................... 12
Table 5: Vegetation Community Description – Exotic closed woodland ....................................................... 14
Table 6: Summary of threatened species likely to occur in proximity to the study area ............................ 15
Table 7: An analysis of vegetation communities mapped in the study area by Tozer (et al. 2010) are
representative of TECs ......................................................................................................................................... 15
Table 8: Noxious weeds recorded within the study area ................................................................................ 17
Table 9: Assessment of the project against the EPBC Act ............................................................................... 28
Table 10: Key threatening processes listed under the TSC Act, likely to be constituted or exacerbated by
the proposed upgrade ......................................................................................................................................... 29
Table 11: Potential for impacts to threatened species listed on the TSC Act ............................................... 31
Table 12: Flora species recorded from the study area. ................................................................................... 37
Table 13: Significant flora species recorded / predicted to occur within 5 km of the study area. ............. 41
Table 14: Vertebrate fauna recorded from the study area (present assessment) ....................................... 56
Table 15: Significant fauna species recorded, or predicted to occur, within 5 km of the study area........ 57
Table 16: Additional threatened marine and shorebird species previously recorded within 5 km of the
study area .............................................................................................................................................................. 73
Table 17: Migratory avifauna species recorded or predicted to occur within 5 km of the study area. .... 75
Table 18: Details of trees to potentially affected .............................................................................................. 76
List of Plates
Plate 1: Sydney Red Gum HBT showing spouts, fissures and associated stags ........................................... 23
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting IV
Glossary
AoS Assessment of Significance – formerly the seven part test
CBD Central Business District
cm centimetre/s
CMA Catchment Management Authority
DBH Diameter at Breast Height
DCP Development Control Plan
DPI Department of Primary Industries
DoE Department of the Environment
EEC Endangered Ecological Community
EP&A Act Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
EPBC Act Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999
FM Act Fisheries Management Act 1994
ha hectares
GIS Geographic Information System
GPS Global Positioning System
HBT Hollow Bearing Tree
km kilometre/s
KTP Key Threatening Process
LEP Local Environment Plan
LGA Local Government Area
m metre/s
mm millimetre/s
NES Matters of National Environmental Significance
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting V
NPWS National Parks and Wildlife Services
NSW New South Wales
NV Act Native Vegetation Act 2003
NW Act Noxious Weeds Act, 1993
OEH Office of Environment and Heritage
Proposal/Project Oatley Station accessibility upgrade.
PVP Property Vegetation Plan
REF Review of Environmental Factors
RoTAP Rare or Threatened Australian Plant
SEPP State Environmental Planning Policy
SIC assessment Significant Impact Criteria assessment
SIS Species Impact Statement
study area The broader area within which the subject site is located
subject site The area of direct impact for the proposed works
TEC Threatened Ecological Community
TfNSW Transport for New South Wales
TPZ Tree Protection Zone
TSC Act Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting vi
Summary
Biosis Pty Ltd was commissioned by Transport for NSW (TfNSW) to undertake a terrestrial flora and fauna
assessment of Oatley Station, Oatley. TfNSW is currently implementing the Transport Access Programme
which aims to improve the accessibility of existing stations across the network. A Review of Environmental
Factors (REF) is to be submitted to assess potential impacts on the environment, as part of the approval
process under Part 5 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act). This report forms the
terrestrial flora and fauna component of the REF.
Ecological values
Key ecological values identified within the study area include:
0.19 ha of highly constrained Degraded hinterland sandstone gully forest. No removal of this
vegetation community is proposed.
0.06 ha of moderately constrained Modified eucalypt woodland of which removal of 0.04 ha is
proposed.
Three hollow bearing trees (HBT), including two Sydney Red Gums Angophora costata and one
Spotted Gum Corymbia maculata (to be removed) that may provide suitable roosting habitat for the
threatened Eastern Freetail-bat.
Habitat trees that may provide suitable foraging habitat and resources for threatened avifauna
species and flying-foxes.
Five flora species listed as noxious within the Hurstville and Kogarah Local Government Area (LGA).
Government legislation and policy
An assessment of the project against key biodiversity legislation and policy is provided and summarised
below.
Legislation / Policy Relevant ecological
feature on site
Permit / Approval
required
Notes
EPBC Act The study area is
considered unlikely to
provide potential habitat
for any matters listed
under the EPBC Act.
An EPBC referral is not
recommended.
Rationale for the likely
occurrence of threatened
flora, fauna and ecological
communities is addressed
in Appendix 1 and
Appendix 2.
TSC Act The study area is
considered unlikely to
provide potential habitat
for any flora, fauna or
ecological communities
listed under the TSC Act.
The completion of a
Species Impact Statement
is not recommended.
Rationale for the likely
occurrence of threatened
flora, fauna and ecological
communities is addressed
in Appendix 1 and
Appendix 2.
FM Act No watercourses were
located within the study
NA NA
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting vii
Legislation / Policy Relevant ecological
feature on site
Permit / Approval
required
Notes
area.
Environmental
Planning &
Assessment Act
No threatened flora
species or Ecological
Communities were
recorded or considered
likely to occur within the
study area.
Potential habitat for one
threatened fauna species,
the Eastern Freetail-bat, is
provided by hollow-bearing
trees.
Significant impacts to
threatened species,
populations or
communities unlikely to
occur.
A SIS is not required.
NA
NW Act Noxious weeds recorded
include:
Boneseed
Lantana
Green Cestrum
Bridal Creeper
Small-leaved Privet
Noxious weeds should be
controlled according to
their control class. The
requirements for each
species is outlined in
Section 3.5.
Note: Guidance provided in this report does not constitute legal advice.
Recommendations
The principal means to reduce impacts on biodiversity values within the study area will be to avoid and
minimise removal of native vegetation and habitat.
Through development of the concept options report and implementation of the recommendations, the
current reference design is relatively sympathetic to the ecological constraints within the study area.
Recommendations to minimise impacts on biodiversity include Tree Protection Zones, implementing hygiene
protocols and appropriately locating construction compounds. These, along with other recommendations,
are further outlined in Section 4.2.
Conclusions
The overall impact of the proposed upgrade of Oatley station to native flora and fauna is considered to be
low. It is unlikely that the proposed works will result in a significant impact to threatened species, populations
or communities and additional approvals are not required.
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 1 1
1. Introduction
1.1 Project background
Biosis Pty Ltd was commissioned by Transport for NSW (TfNSW) to undertake a terrestrial flora and
fauna assessment of Oatley Station, Oatley. As a part of the Transport Access Programme, currently
being rolled out across the network, TfNSW is proposing a number of upgrades to the existing
infrastructure of Oatley Station, including an aerial overbridge stairs, lift and entrance forecourt,
extension of commuter carparking and commuter drop-off areas. A Review of Environmental Factors
(REF) is to be submitted as part of the approval process under Part 5 of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act). This report forms the terrestrial flora and fauna component of
the REF.
A constraints assessment has previously been completed (GHD, 2012) and informed the
development of the current design. It was noted that only a Reference Design is currently available
which may be subject to change; therefore this report covers an area more extensive that the
proposed construction footprint.
1.2 Scope of assessment
The objectives of this investigation are to:
Undertake database searches to determine the potential for NSW or Commonwealth
threatened biota to occur within the study area.
Describe the vascular flora (ferns, conifers, flowering plants) and vertebrate fauna (birds,
mammals, reptiles, frogs, fish).Map native vegetation and other habitat features.
Confirm the extent and condition of any Threatened Ecological Communities (TEC).
Confirm tree species along the western embankment that are proposed for removal.
Confirm tree species along the eastern side of Oatley station that are proposed for removal.
Confirmation of tree species within the commuter carpark that are proposed for removal.
Undertake searching for threatened flora species.
Undertake searching for evidence of occupation by threatened fauna, particularly the
Powerful Owl and Grey-headed Flying-fox.
Review the implications of relevant biodiversity legislation and policy.
Identify potential implications of the proposed development and provide recommendations
to assist with development design.
Recommend any further assessments of the site that may be required.
1.3 Location of the study area
The study area is located in Oatley, approximately 18 kilometres south of the Sydney Central
Business District (CBD), north of the Georges River, and is part of the St George area (Figure 1). The
study area is defined as the area of potential direct impact of the proposed works, and includes
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 2 2
proposed infrastructure upgrades to the car park on Oatley Parade, and the construction of a
pedestrian ramp to be accessed from Oatley Parade to Mulga Road (located adjacent to River Road).
It encompasses 1.54 ha of private and public land and adjacent road reserves and is currently zoned
RE1 Public Recreation, SP2 Infrastructure (Railway) and R2 Low Density Residential.
The study area is within the:
Sydney Basin Bioregion
Georges River catchment
Sydney Metro Catchment Management Area (CMA)
Hurstville and Kogarah Local Government Area (LGA) (note: the LGA boundary runs straight
through Oatley Station)
Mimosa Street
Mulga Road
Acacia Street
Algernon Street
Boundary Road
Ada S
treet
West C
rescent
Myrtle Street
Louis
a Stre
et
Mi M
i Stre
et
Wyong S
treet
West CrescentGle
n Roa
d
Letitia
Street
Frederick Street
Victory Road
Anne
tte St
reet
Renown Avenue
Boorar
a Aven
ue
Wonoona Parade
Godfrey Street
Ro se Aven
ue
Myall
Stree
t
Warat
ah St
reet
Yarran
Road
Llewelly
n Stree
t
Princes StreetSe
aforth
Aven
uePitt Street
George Street
Kitchener Street
Queens Road
Queens Road
Oatle
y Ave
nue
Judd Street
Judd StreetBlanche Str
eet
Herbert Street
Russell Street
MyraPla
ce
A squithStr
eet
Neville Street
Oatle
y Para
de
Hurstville Road
Letitia
Stree
t
Grove Avenue
Hurstville Road
Gung
ah Ba
y Roa
d
Woron
ora Pa
rade
Rosa
Street
Hurstvil leR oad
Hillcrest Avenue
Illaw
arraRailway
GeorgesRiver
Dairy Creek
Georges River
RenownCreek
CONNELLS BAYNEVERFAILBAY
GUNGAH BAY
OATLEY BAY
GEORGESRIVER
GEORGESRIVER
Parkes
Canberra
SydneyWollongong
Albury
Newcastle
Acknowledgement: Topo (c) NSW Land and Planning Information (2011); Overivew (c) State of NSW (c.2003)
Matter: 17612Date: 24 February 2014,Checked by: NMG, Drawn by: JMS, Last edited by: jshepherdLocation:P:\17600s\17612\Mapping\
LegendStudy AreaSubject site
Scale 1:10,000 @ A4, GDA 1994 MGA Zone 55
0 100 200 300 400
Metres ±Biosis Pty LtdBallarat, Brisbane, Canberra, Melbourne, Sydney, Wangaratta & Wollongong
Figure 1: Location of the Study Area - Oatley, NewSouth Wales
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 4 4
2. Methods
2.1 Nomenclature
The flora taxonomy (classification) used in this report follows the most recent Flora of NSW (Harden,
2002). Where nomenclature was uncertain, species names were verified with the on-line Australian
Plant Name Index (Australian National Botanic Gardens, 2007). In the text of this report, flora species
are referred to by both their common and scientific names when first mentioned and common
names only thereafter. Flora common names, where available, have been included in threatened
species tables and the complete flora list in Appendix 1.
Names of vertebrates follow the Census of Australian Vertebrates maintained by the Commonwealth
Department of Environment (DEWHA 2009). In the body of this report vertebrates are referred to by
both their common and scientific names when first mentioned. Subsequent references to these
species cite the common name only. Common and scientific names are included in the fauna list in
Appendix 2.
2.2 Literature and database review
In order to provide a context for the study area, information about flora and fauna from within five
kilometres of the study area (the ‘local area’) was obtained from relevant public databases. Records
from the databases outlined in Table 1 were collated and reviewed.
Table 1: Database searches completed for the report
Database Records Accessed Search
radius
Date of
access
Department of Environment Protected
Matters Search Tool Database
Records of Matters of National
Environmental Significance
(NES) listed under the
provisions of the EPBC Act.
5 km January
2013
Office of Environment and Heritage
(OEH) Atlas of NSW Wildlife
Records of threatened flora and
fauna species listed on the
schedules of the TSC and EPBC
Acts.
5 km January
2013
Birds Australia, New Atlas of
Australian Birds
Records of threatened and
migratory bird species.
5 km January
2013
PlantNet, Rare or Threatened
Australian Plants listing
Rare or Threatened Australian
Plants.
Oatley with
5 km buffer
January
2013
Department of Primary Industries
(DPI), Noxious Weeds Database
Noxious weeds. Hurstville
and
Kogarah
City Council
January
2013
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 5 5
Database Records Accessed Search
radius
Date of
access
LGAs
Other sources of biodiversity information:
Relevant vegetation mapping, including:
– Native vegetation of southeast NSW: a revised classification and map for the coast
and eastern tablelands (Tozer et al. 2010).
– The native vegetation of the Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority
area (SMCMA, 2009).
The following was also reviewed:
Transport Access Program: Oatley Station Precinct – Ecological Constraints Assessment (GHD,
2012)
Oatley Station Precinct Accessibility Upgrade – Proposed Site Plan. Drawing TAP-1822-AR-
0006. (GHD, 2013)
Showing Sheet Layout for Detail and Levels of Oatley Railway Station and Interchange
Facilities. Drawing 33700A01.dwg. (DS&P, 2013).
Myles Dunphy Reserve and Wetland Plan of Management (Hurstville City Council, 2013)
2.3 Site investigation
2.3.1 Flora assessment
The flora assessment was undertaken on 15 January 2014 by Ed Cooper (Botanist) with Biosis, who
assessed the vegetation communities of the study area using a combination of random meander
(Cropper, 2003) and vegetation association to determine the vegetation assemblage and the relevant
classification, present within the study area.
A list of flora species was compiled (Appendix 1). The general condition, structure and connectivity of
native vegetation was observed, as well as the effects of current seasonal conditions. Notes were
made on specific issues such as noxious weeds, evidence of management works and general
impacts.
Flora records will be submitted to OEH for incorporation into the Atlas of NSW Wildlife.
2.3.2 Fauna assessment
The fauna assessment was undertaken on 15 January 2014 by Alexandra Cave (Zoologist) with Biosis,
to determine its values for fauna. These were determined primarily on the basis of the types and
qualities of habitat(s) present. All species of fauna observed during the assessment were noted
(Appendix 2) and active searching for fauna was undertaken. This included direct observation,
searching under rocks and logs, examination of tracks and scats and identifying calls. Particular
attention was given to searching for significant species and their habitats, particularly those outlined
in Section 1.2. Fauna species were recorded with a view to characterising the values of the site and
the investigation was not intended to provide a comprehensive survey of all fauna that has potential
to utilise the study area over time.
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 6 6
Fauna records will be submitted to OEH for incorporation into the Atlas of NSW Wildlife.
2.3.3 Permits and Licenses
The flora and fauna assessment was conducted under the terms of Basis's Scientific License issued
by OEH under the NP&W Act (SL100758). Fauna survey was conducted under approval 11/355 from
the NSW Animal Care and Ethics Committee.
2.4 Survey limitations
Ecological surveys provide a sampling of flora and fauna at a given time and season. There are a
number of reasons why not all species will be detected at a site during survey, such as species
dormancy and migration and breeding behaviours of some fauna. In many cases these factors do
not present a significant limitation to assessing the overall biodiversity values of a site and potential
habitat for such species was assess during the site investigation.
The current flora and fauna assessment was conducted in mid summer which is not an optimal time
to survey for all species, particularly for some cryptic flora species such as Orchids which have a finite
flowering time.
The tree hollow survey was undertaken from the ground using binoculars to determine the presence
of tree hollows. Where there was uncertainty as to whether hollows had depth these would have
been described as potential tree hollows.
2.5 Legislation and policy
The implications for the project were assessed in relation to key biodiversity legislation and policy
including;
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, 1999 (EPBC Act);
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 (EP&A Act), including
– State Environmental Planning Policy No. 19 – Bushland in Urban Areas.
Threatened Species Conservation Act, 1995 (TSC Act).
Native Vegetation Act, 2003 (NV Act).
Noxious Weeds Act, 1993 (NW Act).
National Parks and Wildlife Act, 1974 (NP&W Act).
Kogarah and Hurstville Development Control Plan (DCP), 2002.
Kogarah and Hurstville (Draft) Local Environment Plan (LEP), 2012.
2.6 Mapping
Mapping was conducted using hand-held (uncorrected) GPS units (Garmin GPS Map 62s) and aerial
photo interpretation. The accuracy of this mapping is therefore subject to the accuracy of the GPS
units (generally ± seven metres) and dependent on the limitations of aerial photo rectification and
registration.
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 7 7
Mapping has been produced using a Geographic Information System (GIS). Electronic GIS files which
contain our flora and fauna spatial data are available to incorporate into design concept plans.
However this mapping may not be sufficiently precise for detailed design purposes.
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 8 8
3. Results
3.1 Ecological Results
The ecological features of the study area are described below and mapped in Figure 2.
A total of 81 flora species (16 native and 65 exotic) as well as eight fauna species were recorded
during the current assessment. Species recorded during the flora and fauna assessment are listed in
Appendix 1 (flora) and Appendix 2 (fauna). Unless of particular note, these species are not discussed
further.
A list of significant species recorded or predicted to occur in the local area is also provided in those
appendices, along with an assessment of the likelihood of the species occurring within the study
area.
3.2 Site context and connectivity
The study area is located in the suburb of Oatley. Oatley is predominately a residential suburb, with
a number of natural bush areas and remnant trees in gardens and along streets. Of particular note
to this project is Myles Dunphy Reserve, which is located to the south-west of the station. Myles
Dunphy Reserve forms a large patch of remnant native vegetation in good condition, and is known to
support a number of threatened flora and fauna species and threatened ecological communities.
The proposed project footprint is located either side of the rail corridor along the entirety of the
Oatley Station platform. Within the development footprint, much of the remnant native vegetation
has been removed or altered with remaining native vegetation in a patchy and highly fragmented
state.
These modified vegetation communities would support opportunistic and resilient native fauna,
often associated with urban habitats. This is further supported by the fauna documented through
observations made during the site visit (refer to Table 14). Due to the presence of the rail corridor,
Mulga Road and Oatley Parade connectivity is almost non-existent other than for mobile avifauna
species.
3.3 Vegetation and fauna habitat
The vegetation and fauna habitat throughout the majority of the study area has been modified by
changes in land use throughout the local area. Remnant vegetation has predominantly been cleared
to make way for residential, commercial, recreational and infrastructure development. Such
development includes the commuter carpark, Oatley Memorial Park, the rail corridor and the
ornamental garden on the corner of Oatley Parade and River Road.
The study area supports four separate vegetation communities based on condition and floristic
composition, including two native vegetation communities and two exotic vegetation communities,
including:
Degraded hinterland sandstone gully forest (native).
Mown exotic grasses and ornamental plantings (exotic).
Modified eucalypt woodland (native).
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 9 9
Exotic closed woodland (exotic).
The floristic composition, associated soil type and location of each community is detailed in Table 2
to Table 5, and outlined in Figure 2.
Table 2: Vegetation Community Description – Degraded hinterland sandstone gully forest
Stratum Height
Class
% Cover
Dominant
Species
Description
Canopy 10-30
meters
30-40 %
Eucalyptus pilularis,
Eucalyptus
racemosa,
Angophora costata
Topography, geology and soils
This community is typically associated with the
lower slopes of dry sandstone gullies receiving
800 – 1300 mm of rain per annum (Tozer et. al.
2010). The study area is located in a transitional
area between Lucas Heights and the
predominantly sandstone based Gymea soil
landscapes (Chapman and Murphy, 1989). The
Lucas Heights soil landscape is transitional in
it's own right with both shale and sandstone
influences. The soil profiles across the study
area are likely to have been altered by historic
vegetation removal, development and
introduction of topsoil and organic matter.
Condition and weed occurrence
The degraded hinterland sandstone gully
forest within the study area was present in the
form of scattered remnant trees, confined to
the southern boundary of Boondarra Reserve.
Mature Blackbutt Eucalyptus pilularis, Narrow-
leaved Scribbly Gum Eucalyptus racemosa and a
single Sydney Red Gum Angophora costata
formed the canopy. The midstorey was limited
to scattered Cheese Tree Glochidion ferdinandi
with a groundstorey of mown exotic grasses
including Rhodes Grass Chloris gayana,
Common Couch Cynodon dactylon, Goose
Grass Eleusine tristachya, Paspalum Paspalum
dilatatum and Buffalo Grass Stenotaphrum
secundatum. Additionally, scattered lawn
exotics including Burr Medic Medicago
polymorpha, White Clover Trifolium repens,
Dandelion Taraxacum officinale and Catsear
Hypochaeris radicata.
Occurrence within the study area
Approximately 0.19 ha of Degraded hinterland
sandstone gully forest was recorded within the
study area, none of which occurs within the
subject site (Figure 2). It was located at the
southern extent of Boongarra Reserve and
extended along the fenceline of the western
rail corridor boundary, to the south of the
Upper Midstorey 5-10
meters
10 % Glochidion
ferdinandi
Lower Midstorey 2-5 meters 5 %
Absent
Shrubstorey 1-2 meters 10 %
Absent
Groundstorey <1 meters 70 % Chloris gayana,
Cynodon dactylon,
Eleusine tristachya,
Stenotaphrum
secundatum,
Taraxacum
officinale,
Hypochaeris
radicata,
Medicago
polymorpha,
Trifolium repens
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 10 10
access gate.
Fauna habitat features
The degraded hinterland sandstone gully forest
vegetation type within the study area consists
of a handful of remnant habitat trees, including
mature Blackbutt and Narrow-leaved Scribbly
Gum. During flowering periods these tree
species may provide some level of suitable
foraging resources for threatened species, such
as Cockatoos (i.e. Gang-gang Cockatoo
Callocephalon fimbriatum, Glossy Black-
cockatoo Calyptorhynchus lathami and Major
Mitchell's Cockatoo Lophochroa leadbeateri):
however it is considered somewhat unlikely
due to the limited extent of suitable habitat
and proximity of this area to the railway (<
20m) and urban nature of the surrounds.
These feed trees may also provide some
limited foraging resources for the Grey-headed
flying-fox (GHFF) Pteropus poliocephalus,
particularly given there is a known GHFF
population in the adjoining reserve. Scattered
Cheese Trees, where Rainbow lorikeets
Trichoglossus haematodus were observed
foraging on new foliage and fruit, may also
provide potential foraging habitat for
threatened species such as the Little Lorikeet
Glossopsitta pusilla. However, given the
availability of significant areas of larger, better
quality habitat in the locality, the significance of
the scattered habitat resources in this area is
considered to be low. Even so, the trees in this
area are not anticipated to be impacted by the
proposed works. This area also supports an
abundance of coarse woody debris (CWD)
deposits, with old railway sleeper stacks,
littered cement and metal fragments,
surrounded by a thick leaf litter dense with
Casuarina needles.
Conservation Status
Commonwealth EPBC Act: Not listed
NSW TSC Act: Not listed
Based on the lack of key indicator species
within the midstorey, shrubstorey and
groundstorey, this community was not
considered to represent the TSC Act listed EEC
Southern Sydney sheltered forest on transitional
sandstone soils in the Sydney Basin Bioregion.
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 11 11
Table 3: Vegetation Community Description – Mown Exotic Grasses and ornamental
plantings
Stratum Height
Class
%
Cover
Dominant Species Description
Canopy 10-30
meters
30-40 %
Jacaranda mimosifolia,
Cupressus
macrocarpa,
X Cupressocyparis
leylandii,
Lophostemon
confertus
Topography, geology and soils
Recreational areas, and associated disturbed
soils, contained mown exotic grasses and
ornamental plantings. Undisturbed subsoils
are likely to be typical of the transitional area
between Lucas Heights and Gymea soil
landscapes (Chapman and Murphy, 1989),
however the topsoils have been modified by
historic; vegetation removal and introduction
of topsoil and organic matter.
Condition and weed occurrence
This community was comprised almost
exclusively of exotic species. The canopy was
sparse, but included Brush Box Lophostemon
confertus, Monterey Cypress Cupressus
macrocarpa and Jacaranda Jacaranda
mimosifolia. Pepper Tree Schinus areira are
common throughout the recreational areas
along with scattered Cocos Palm Syagrus
romanzoffiana and Chinese Elm Ulmus
parvifolia. Dominant shrubs include Abelia sp.,
Photinia sp., Agapanthus Agapanthus praecox
and Strelitzia reginae. Typical groundstorey
species present included Rhodes Grass
Chloris gayana, Common Couch, Goose Grass,
Paspalum Paspalum dilatatum, Buffalo Grass,
Summer Grass Digitaria ciliaris, Paspalum and
Panic Veldtgrass Ehrharta erecta. Scattered
exotic forbs included Red-flowered Mallow
Modiola caroliniana, White Clover, Scarlet
Pimpernel Anagallis arvensis, Oxalis sp and
Catsear. The high proportion of exotic species
and maintained nature of this community
means that is of little botanical value.
Occurrence within the study area
Approximately 1.07 ha of mown exotic
grasses and ornamental plantings were
recorded, throughout the recreational areas
in the study area (Figure 2).
Fauna habitat features
The mown exotic grasses and ornamental
plantings vegetation community provides
little in way of suitable native vegetation and
habitat for threatened fauna. This community
Upper Midstorey 5-10
meters
10 % Schinus areira,
Syagrus
romanzoffiana,
Schefflera actinophylla
Lower Midstorey 2-5
meters
5 %
Ulmus parvifolia,
Lantana camara
Shrubstorey 1-2
meters
10 %
Agapanthus praecox,
Canna x generalis,
Photinia sp.,
Strelitzia reginae
Groundstorey <1 meters 700 % Stenotaphrum
secundatum,
Chloris gayana,
Ehrharta erecta,
Cynodon dactylon,
Eragrostis pilosa,
Digitaria ciliaris,
Gazania linearis,
Erigeron karvinskianus,
Eleusine tristachya,
Modiola caroliniana,
Anagallis arvensis,
Hypochaeris radicata,
Oxalis sp.,
Medicago polymorpha,
Trifolium repens
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 12 12
has been planted around a fast-flowing man-
made fountain, which was observed to
provide breeding habitat for the Striped
marsh frog Limnodynastes peronii with floating
egg masses attached to overhanging
vegetation observed. This area is not
considered to provide any potential habitat
for any threatened frogs (refer to Table 15).
Conservation Status
Commonwealth EPBC Act: Not listed
NSW TSC Act: Not listed
Table 4: Vegetation Community Description – Modified eucalypt woodland
Stratum Height
Class
%
Cover
Dominant Species Description
Canopy 10-30
meters
30-40 %
Corymbia maculate,
Angophora costata
Topography, geology and soils
The modified eucalypt woodland is located
around the existing commuter carpark,
inbetween areas of hard standing. These soils
bare little resemblance to the undisturbed
soil profile given the level of previous
disturbance.
Condition and weed occurrence
The modified eucalypt woodland is comprised
of two likely remnant Sydney Red Gums along
with a planted Spotted Gum Corymbia
maculata, Tallowwood Eucalyptus microcorys
and Pepper Tree. A row of Weeping
Bottlebrush Callistemon viminalis have been
planted along the fenceline of the commuter
carpark which, along with Mickey Mouse Plant
Ochna serrulata, form the midstory. The shrub
storey and ground storey is almost entirely
exotic and includes species such as Panic
Veldtgrass, Rhodes Grass, Black-berry
Nightshade Solanum nigrum, Bridal Creeper
Asparagus asparagoides, Morning Glory
Ipomoea indica, Asparagus Fern and the
noxious Lantana, Green Cestrum and
Boneseed Chrysanthemoides monilifera subsp.
monilifera.
Occurrence within the study area
Approximately 0.06 ha of modified eucalypt
woodland was recorded around the
commuter carpark (Figure 2).
Upper Midstorey 5-10
meters
10 % Eucalyptus microcorys,
Schefflera actinophylla
Lower Midstorey 2-5
meters
5 %
Callistemon viminalis,
Ochna serrulata,
Cestrum parqui,
Lantana camara
Shrubstorey 1-2
meters
10 %
Chrysanthemoides
monilifera subsp.
monilifera,
Hedera helix,
Solanum nigrum
Groundstorey <1
meters
700 % Stenotaphrum
secundatum,
Chloris gayana,
Ehrharta erecta,
Anagallis arvensis,
Asparagus aethiopicus
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 13 13
Fauna habitat features
This modified eucalypt woodland vegetation
formation comprises of two remnant Sydney
Red Gums along with street plantings of
Spotted Gums, and Tallowwood. This area
provides some level of suitable habitat for
threatened species, such as roosting habitat
for tree-hollow dependent microbats, such as
the Eastern freetail-bat Mormopterus
norfolkensis. The Sydney Red Gums, in
particular, provide good quality habitat trees
for microbats - with large deposits of
exfoliating bark, sections of dead wood and
protruding stags and some small spouts and
hollows providing multiple potential entry
points for microbats. Seasonal flowering of
the trees in this area may also provide
suitable foraging habitat for the GHFF, and a
number of nectarivorous birds, albeit limited.
Conservation Status
Commonwealth EPBC Act: Not listed
NSW TSC Act: Not listed
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 14 14
Table 5: Vegetation Community Description – Exotic closed woodland
Stratum Height
Class
% Cover
Dominant Species Description
Canopy 10-30
meters
30-40 %
Eucalyptus
microcorys,
Populus nigra,
Casuarina glauca
Topography, geology and soils
The closed exotic woodland is located adjacent
to the rail corridor, on the southern
embankment. Soils here have been disturbed
by the construction of the railway line and
much of the vegetation is growing out of the
rock ballast embankment.
Condition and weed occurrence
The closed exotic woodland included a
combination of planted native and exotic
species and opportunistic weeds. Lombardy
Poplar Populus nigra, Swamp Oak Casuarina
glauca and two Tallowwood trees1 form the
canopy with a dense midstorey of Cheese
Tree, Camphor Laurel, Green Cestrum,
Lantana and Mickey Mouse Plant. This dense
midstorey has lead to a relatively sparse shrub
and groundstorey strata; however Crofton
Weed Ageratina adenophora, Small-leaved
Privet Ligustrum sinense, Black-berry
Nightshade and Fennel Foeniculum vulgare
were recorded. Exotic vines and scramblers
including Bridal Creeper, Asparagus Fern and
Morning Glory were recorded growing along
the chainlink fence. To the west of the fence, a
row of juvenile Turpentine Syncarpis
glomulifera have been planted.
Occurrence within the study area
Approximately 0.24 ha of exotic open forest
was recorded along the southern rail corridor
embankment of the rail corridor (Figure 2).
Fauna habitat features
The exotic closed woodland vegetation
community fronting the railway corridor
provides very little in way of suitable habitat
for threatened species.
Conservation Status
Commonwealth EPBC Act: Not listed
NSW TSC Act: Not listed
Upper Midstorey 5-10
meters
10 % Cinnamomum
camphora,
Glochidion
ferdinandi,
Syncarpia
glomulifera
Lower Midstorey 2-5 meters 5 %
Ochna serrulata,
Cestrum parqui,
Lantana camara,
Shrubstorey 1-2 meters 10 %
Ageratina
adenophora,
Ligustrum sinense,
Solanum nigrum,
Foeniculum vulgare
Groundstorey <1 meters 700 % Bidens pilosa,
Avena fatua,
Araujia sericifera,
Bromus cartharticus,
Ehrharta erecta,
Anagallis arvensis,
Asparagus
aethiopicus
1 the two mature Eucalypts were determined to be Tallowwood based on observations of the bark from the rail
corridor fence and of the foliage using binoculars from the platform. Access to the rail corridor for fruit collection
was not possible.
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 15 15
3.4 Threatened flora, fauna and ecological communities
3.4.1 Threatened species
No EPBC Act or TSC Act listed threatened flora or fauna species were identified within the study area
during the assessment conducted by Biosis on 15 January 2014.
Threatened species recorded or predicted to occur within five kilometres of the study area are listed
in Appendix 1 (flora) and Appendix 2 (fauna) and mapped in Figure 3 (flora) and Figure 4 (fauna). An
assessment of the likelihood of these species occurring in the study area, and an indication of which
habitats or habitat features are likely to support the species is included.
Listed marine and shorebird species that were identified as having the potential to occur are listed in
Table 16. These species are not considered in further detail in this report given the complete absence
of suitable habitat in the study area for these species. A summary of those species recorded or with a
medium or higher likelihood of occurring in the study area is provided in Table 6.
Table 6: Summary of threatened species likely to occur in proximity to the study area
Name Area of value within the study area
Threatened ecological communities – no threatened ecological communities were recorded or
considered likely to occur within the study area.
Threatened flora – no threatened flora was recorded or considered likely to occur within the
study area.
Threatened fauna – one threatened fauna species was considered to have a medium potential
of being impacted by the proposed works
Eastern Freetail-bat
Mormopterus norfolcencis
The species is considered to have the potential to utilize
foraging and roosting habitat resources in the study area,
and suitable microbat hollows were observed in a number
of trees surrounding the carpark, including two Sydney Red
Gums, and one Spotted Gum. The removal of these trees
has the potential to impact breeding resources for this
species in the locality, if they were found to be utilising the
HBTs on site.
3.4.2 Threatened ecological communities
Background research prior to the site investigation identified that three vegetation communities
were mapped in or adjacent to the study area (Tozer et al. 2010). An analysis of whether these
vegetation communities are representative of threatened ecological communities listed under the
EPBC Act or TSC Act and their occurrence within the study area is provided in Table 7.
Table 7: An analysis of vegetation communities mapped in the study area by Tozer (et al.
2010) are representative of TECs
Vegetation community Threatened Ecological Community
Coastal sandstone ridgetop woodland Coastal sandstone ridgetop woodland (Tozer et
al. 2010) is not considered to be representative of
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 16 16
Vegetation community Threatened Ecological Community
any TECs.
This vegetation community was not mapped in
the study area.
Hinterland sandstone gully forest Hinterland sandstone gully forest (Tozer et al.
2010) is not considered to be representative of
any TECs.
Overstorey species in a patch of degraded
hinterland sandstone gully forest mapped in the
southeast of the study area, including remnant
Blackbutt, Narrow-leaved Scribbly Gum, Sydney
Red Gum and Cheese Tree, are diagnostic
overstorey species for Southern Sydney
Sheltered Forest TEC.
However, based on the lack of key diagnostic
species in the groundstorey and midstorey this
vegetation community was not considered
representative of Southern Sydney Sheltered
Forest TEC.
Sydney turpentine ironbark forest Sydney turpentine ironbark forest (Tozer et al.
2010) is listed as a threatened ecological
community (TEC) under both the TSC Act
(Endangered) and the EPBC Act (Critically
endangered).
A focus of the site visit was to determine whether
the patches previously mapped as a TEC, or any
other vegetation, was consistent with the final
determinations for Sydney turpentine ironbark
forest (NSW Scientific Committee, 2011). The
small patch of Sydney turpentine ironbark forest
mapped by Tozer (et al. 2010) does not contain
key diagnostic species and is not considered
representative of the Sydney turpentine ironbark
forest TEC.
Myles Dunphy Reserve, located approximately 80
m southwest of the study area, is comprised of
remnant bushland and wetlands and contains a
relatively large patch of Sydney turpentine
ironbark forest TEC.
3.5 Noxious weeds
Five species listed as noxious within Hurstville and Kogarah City Council LGAs were recorded within
the study area (DPI, 2013). The details of these species, along with the legal requirements, are
outlined in Table 8below.
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 17 17
Table 8: Noxious weeds recorded within the study area
Common
Name
Scientific Name Class Legal Requirement
Boneseed Chrysanthemoide
s monilifera
subsp. monilifera
2 The plant must be eradicated from the land and the
land must be kept free of the plant.
Bridal Creeper Asparagus
asparagoides
4 The plant must not be sold, propagated or knowingly
distributed
Green Cestrum Cestrum parqui 3 The plant must be fully and continuously suppressed
and destroyed
Lantana Lantana camara 4 The growth of the plant must be managed in a manner
that reduces its numbers, spread and incidence and
continuously inhibits its reproduction; and the plant
must not be sold propagated or knowingly distributed
Privet (narrow
leaf)
Ligustrum sinense 4 The growth of the plant must be managed in a manner
that reduces its numbers spread and incidence and
continuously inhibits its flowering and reproduction
A full list of exotic species, including declared noxious weeds identified in the study area, are listed in
Appendix 1; Table 12.
GF
GF
GF
Mulga Road
Oatley Avenue
Frederick Street
Oatle
y Para
de
Rive r
Road River Road
River
Road
River Roa
d
Illawa
rra Ra
ilway
Proposedbridge
and lifts
Proposedcommuter
carpark
060
061
062
0 10 20 30 40 50
MetresMatter: 17612Date: 24 February 2014, Checked by: NMG, Drawn by: JMS, Last edited by: ngarveyLocation:P:\17600s\17612\Mapping\17612_F2_Veg
Biosis Pty LtdBallarat, Brisbane, Canberra, Melbourne, Sydney, Wangaratta & Wollongong ±
Acknowledgements: Imagery provided by Transport for New South Wales
LegendGF Hollow Bearing Tree
Subject SiteStudy AreaDegraded Hinterland Sandstone Gully ForestExotic Closed WoodlandModified Eucalypt WoodlandMown Exotic Grasses and Ornamental Plantings
Scale 1:1,000 @ A3Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 56
Figure 2: Vegetation Communities and Fauna Habitat Features of the Study Area
GFGFGF
GFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGF GFGFGF
GF
GF
GFGFGFGFGF
GFGFGFGFGFGF
GF
GF
GFGF
GFGFGFGF
GFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGF
GFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGF
GFGF
GFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGF
GF GFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGF GFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGF
GFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGF GF
GFGF
GFGF
SUTHERLANDSUTHERLANDSHIRESHIRE
Acac
ia Ro
ad
Princ
es H
ighwa
y
Princes Highway
5458
5458
5458
438643865458 3363
33633363
2618
62064248 4248385742483857 4248
3860
38605458
3860
5458 6206545812546
125467752
3857 33633857
385738576206
3857
3857
4875 62063860
386038603857
38602234
6206 37283857 96723860
3857
38573860 3860 38603860
38603860
0 400 800 1,200 1,600 2,000
Metres
LegendStudy AreaSearch area
Threatened floraGF 12546; Hibbertia stricta subsp. furcatulaGF 2234; Wilsonia backhouseiGF 2618; Leucopogon exolasiusGF 3363; Maundia triglochinoidesGF 3728; Acacia bynoeanaGF 3857; Acacia prominensGF 3860; Acacia pubescensGF 4248; Melaleuca deaneiGF 4386; Caladenia tessellataGF 4875; Deyeuxia appressaGF 5458; Persoonia hirsutaGF 6206; Tetratheca junceaGF 7752; Epacris purpurascens var. purpurascensGF 9672; Acacia terminalis subsp. terminalis
±Ma tter: 17612Da te : 29 Jan u ary 2014, Ch ecked by: N M G , D raw n by: JM S, La st edited by: jsh ep h erdLocation :P:\17600s\17612\M a pp in g\17612_F3 _ThrFlora 5km
Biosis Pty LtdBallarat, Brisbane, Canberra, Melbourne,
Sydney,Wangaratta & Wollongong
Scale: 1:40,000 @ A3
Figure 3: Threatened Florawithin 5km of the StudyArea
Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 55
Acknowledgements: Topo (c) NSW LPI
XW
XWXW
_̂XW
XWXWXW XW
_̂XW _̂̂_XW
XWXW _̂̂_̂_̂__̂XW _̂_̂
XWXW _̂_̂XW XW_̂̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂__̂_̂̂__̂ _̂̂_̂_
XWXW
XWXW XW
_̂̂__̂̂__̂XW _̂XWXWXW
_̂!(
_̂̂__̂̂_XWXW
_̂XW XWXW_̂
_̂XW
_̂XW
_̂̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_
_̂
_̂
_̂
_̂
_̂
_̂
_̂
_̂
_̂
SUTHERLANDSUTHERLANDSHIRESHIRE
Pr inces Highway
Hillcrest Avenue
Corea
Stree
t
King Georges Road
Forest Road
Menai Road
Belm
ore Ro
ad
Bates Drive
Tara Street
Oatle
y Par a
de
Rai lw
ayCr
escen
t
Tivoli
Espla
nade
Toron
toPa
rade
Billa
Road
Evelyn Street
Little
Moon Trail
Box Road
Com oRoa
d
Ramsgate RoadAlford
sPoin
t Roa
d
Hurstville Road
C ar avan Head Road
Park Road
King Georges Road
Gung
ah Ba
y Roa
d
G eorges Ri ver Crescent
The Boulevarde
Oyster Bay Road
Bangor BypassRiver Road
Taren
Point
Road
Alford
s Poin
t Roa
d
River Road
The Es pl ana
de
Box Road
Lorrai
neStr
eet
King Georges RoadBoundary Road
Henry Lawson Drive
Woniora RoadBelgra ve
Esp la nade
Fores
tRoad
B rus
hwoo
dDriv
e
Bates Driv e
Old FerryRoad
Holt Road
Fowler Road
Wolge
r Stre
et
Washin gtonDrive
Soldi
ersRo
ad
Freya
Stree
t
Forest Road
Tudar Roa d
PortHa ckingRoad
Connells Point R
oad
Rocky
Point
Road
1280
1280 1280
02481162
12801280
1834
03091162 0248
1162
12801280 02650270
027002481280 0248
12801162 026802681280
183401300241
02480248024806030248
116212801280
02300248
02300248
0260 024818341097
1280
0023311602680309
0241030912801329
00231280 12800603
024812800603
1280
01610161
0309
0130
0248
0241
0130
0130
0183
0248
0405
0 360 720 1,080 1,440 1,800
Metres
LegendThreatened Fauna!( Amphibians_̂ BirdsXW Mammals
Search AreaStudy Area
±Ma tter: 17612Da te : 29 Jan u ary 2014, Ch ecked by: AC , D raw n by: JM S, La st edited by: jsh ep h erdLocation :P:\17600s\17612\M a pp in g\17612_F4 _ThrFa un a_au toG en
Biosis Pty LtdBallarat, Brisbane, Canberra, Melbourne,
Sydney,Wangaratta & Wollongong
Scale: 1:36,000 @ A3
Figure 4: Threatened Faunawithin 5km of the StudyArea
Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 55
Acknowledgements: Topo (c) NSW LPI
Species listAmphibians3116 - Red-crowned Toadlet
Birds0023 - Superb Fruit-Dove0130 - Pied Oystercatcher0139 - Lesser Sand-plover0161 - Curlew Sandpiper0183 - Black-necked Stork0230 - Square-tailed Kite0241 - Osprey0248 - Powerful Owl0260 - Little Lorikeet0265 - Glossy Black-Cockatoo0268 - Gang-gang Cockatoo0270 - Major Mitchell's Cockatoo0309 - Swift Parrot0405 - Olive Whistler0603 - Regent Honeyeater
Mammals1097 - Long-nosed Bandicoot1162 - Koala1280 - Grey-headed Flying-fox1329 - Eastern Freetail-bat1834 - Eastern Bentwing-bat
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 21
4. Potential impacts and recommended mitigation measures
This section identifies the potential impacts of the proposed Oatley station upgrade on the ecological values
of the subject site and study area (Section 4.1) and includes recommendations to assist TfNSW to avoid and
minimise the impacts on biodiversity values (Section 4.2). The proposed upgrades to Oatley stations are
outlined in Section 1 and shown in Figure 5.
4.1 Potential impacts
4.1.1 Direct impacts
The direct impact zone is defined as the construction footprint, forming a corridor from the bus shelter on
Oatley Parade west to Mulga Street in addition to the commuter carpark on Oatley Parade (Figure 5).
The proposed alignment of the bridge and lift infrastructure will require 0.06 ha of vegetation clearing,
including:
0.01 ha of Mown Exotic Grasses and Ornamental Plantings
0.04 ha of Modified Eucalypt Woodland.
0.01 ha of Exotic Closed Woodland.
The proposed works are likely to result in the removal of 24 trees, as outlined in Table 18 (Appendix 3) and
shown in Figure 6. Of these, 12 are native species. A further 14 trees have a moderate likelihood of impact
due to their proximity to the proposed works. Of these nine are native species. The extension of the
commuter carpark is likely to require the clearing of the Sydney Red Gum and Pepper tree in the centre and
potentially the row of Spotted Gum and Tallowwood and the mature Sydney Red Gum in the northern corner.
The current scope of the project does not include the removal of any mature vegetation from within the
Degraded hinterland sandstone gully forest community. Although not considered to represent a TEC, these
trees are of ecological value and recommendations regarding their protection have been made in Section 4.2.
4.1.2 Indirect impacts
The indirect impact zones are the areas where impacts are likely to be temporary and restricted to the
construction phase of the upgrade.
Indirect impacts are likely to be greatest in close proximity to the subject site, however the proposal has the
potential to have indirect impacts at greater distance particularly where stockpiling or equipment storage is
required. Potential indirect impacts to vegetation include the following:
Damage to remnant native trees during movement of soil by machinery across the site.
Damage to native vegetation resulting from machinery and soil compaction.
Introduction of noxious weed species or spread of those currently occurring within the study area
construction plant and equipment.
The introduction of soil pathogens.
Soil contamination resulting from fuel spills or other contamination.
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 22
As only a Reference Design is currently available which may be subject to change, the indirect impact zone is
considered to include the entirety of the study area (less direct impacts), totaling approximately 1.5 ha of
largely landscaped exotic vegetation, including:
0.19 ha of Degraded hinterland sandstone gully forest
0.02 ha of Modified eucalypt woodland
1.06 ha of Mown exotic grasses and ornamental plantings
0.23 ha of Exotic closed woodland
In addition to the impacts outlined above, various compound areas will be required for the storage of
equipment and infrastructure. The location of these compound areas is yet to be confirmed; however
potential areas within the study area have been identified and categorised based on their ecological values
(Figure 5). The grading system is as follows;
Category 1 – Ideal.
– Includes areas of hard standing with no ecological value.
Category 2 – Preferred.
– Includes mown exotic grasses that will recover quickly from disturbance. The Category 2
patch to the east of Oatley Parade is comprised of the mown areas surrounding remnant
trees.
Category 3 – Possible.
– Includes landscaped vegetation with relatively little ecological value. Category 3 areas should
only be used where no viable alternative Category 1 or 2 sites are available.
Category 4 – No Go Zones.
– Includes mature native and exotic canopy species that should be avoided.
Amelioration measures to minimise the potential for indirect impacts on the vegetation to be retained are
discussed in Section 6.
4.1.3 Impacts to threatened flora and ecological communities
No TSC act or EPBC Act listed TECs were recorded within the study area.
No threatened flora species were identified during the site assessment or are considered likely to occur
within the study area, and therefore no direct or indirect impacts are anticipated.
There is potential for removal of a number of trees surrounding the carpark, including two Sydney Red Gums,
and one Spotted Gum, to impact on roosting and breeding resources for the Eastern Freetail-bat
4.1.4 Impacts to fauna habitat
The proposed railway station upgrade will cause some localised disturbance to potential fauna habitat
associated with the railway corridor, including:
Three hollow-bearing trees which provide some scattered seasonal potential foraging habitat for
various avifauna species, such as the Grey-headed flying-fox, and multiple small hollows, stags,
spouts and fissures (refer to Plate 2) that provide potential roosting resources for microbats
including the Eastern Freetail-bat.
Foraging resources, such as the Cheese Trees, which may support a variety of frugivorous birds.
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 23
Injury or death of resident or visiting fauna may result during the clearing of vegetation, and activities related
to the removal of habitat trees. Some species can more readily evade injury by flying (birds). Many species,
however, are unlikely to move quickly enough to avoid being injured. For example, many smaller ground-
dwelling species, such as frogs, lizards and snakes, are unable to move rapidly and have little space to find
refuge within the study area.
Plate 1: Sydney Red Gum HBT showing spouts, fissures and associated stags
4.1.5 Habitat fragmentation and increased edge effects
Habitat fragmentation is the division of a single area of habitat into two or more smaller areas, with a new
habitat type occurring in the area between the fragments. This new dividing habitat type is often artificial and
inhospitable to the fauna species remaining within the fragments and can provide suitable conditions for
weed species to establish, which may out-compete native flora species.
The vegetation communities within the subject site are currently highly fragmented and edge affected,
showing a high proportion of exotic species. The Proposal is unlikely to further increase fragmentation or
edge effects on these communities since the patch sizes are small and have evidence of disturbance
throughout.
As the site is highly urbanized it is unlikely that the Proposal will create or extend any barriers to movement
for flora and fauna.
4.1.6 Impacts on embankment stability
The western rail embankment appears to be constructed from a combination of railway sleepers, ballast and
fill. A number of star picket's are protruding from the embankment at precarious angles suggesting that the
current level of stability is poor.
Mature trees and shrubs will require removal from the western rail embankment to facilitate construction of
the over bridge. The extent to which the embankment is being stabilised by this vegetation is unclear;
however a precautionary approach should be adopted to minimize the risk of slipping or collapse during
vegetation removal.
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 24
4.2 Recommended mitigation measures
The principal mechanism to reduce impacts on biodiversity values within the study area will be to minimise
removal of native vegetation and fauna habitat by restricting the encroachment of the works on adjacent
native vegetation.
The principal means to reduce impacts on biodiversity values within the study area will be to avoid and
minimise removal of native vegetation and habitat.
The Oatley Station Precinct Ecological Constraints Assessment (GHD, 2012) outlined the key constraints of the
study area as the mapped area of Degraded hinterland sandstone gully forest (Figure 2), mapped as very
highly constrained, and the Modified eucalypt woodland (Figure 2) mapped as moderately constrained.
Having determined that the Degraded hinterland sandstone gully forest within the study area is not
consistent with the TSC Act listed TEC Southern Sydney sheltered forest, this vegetation is considered to be
moderately constrained.
The majority of the study area was determined to be of relatively low biodiversity value because of historic
disturbance which has lead to broad scale clearing of native vegetation and substantial recruitment of exotic
species. It would appear that the results of the constraints assessment have been taken into consideration
when deciding upon the alignment of the reference design, which is sympathetic with the biodiversity values
which are present.
The following mitigation measures would be implemented to avoid and minimise potential impacts to
ecological values during and after the construction phase of the proposed upgrade:
Existing native vegetation would be retained where possible.
Tree protection zones, including root protection zones and canopy protection zones, should be
established around remnant in accordance with AS 4970 – 2009. An approximate alignment for
fencing for the Degraded hinterland sandstone gully forest remnant trees is marked in Figure 6.
Additional fencing may be required for remnant trees to the east of Oatley Parade once the final
location of construction compounds is determined.
Construction staff would be inducted to an appropriate level and made aware of the importance of
the remnant trees within the Degraded hinterland sandstone gully forest.
The vegetation within the Exotic closed woodland community of the subject site is of relatively low
ecological value; however it is currently stabilising the western railway embankment. The current
extent of this stabilisation is unknown, therefore its removal should be carried out in a precautionary
manner. Where possible, stumps would be left in situ and poisoned with an appropriate herbicide to
prevent regrowth. If complete removal of trees providing substantial stabilisation is required, addition
advice regarding engineering works may need to be sought.
Construction compounds should be located in the lowest category area that is viable. Where Category
1 areas are not available, areas of native vegetation should be rehabilitated following construction
activities. The removal of native or mature canopy species for compound purposes should be
avoided.
Prevent the dispersal of weed seed or soil born pathogens into native vegetation through the
implementation of vegetation hygiene protocols for footwear, vehicles, heavy plant and machinery.
Be aware of nesting fauna within shrubby vegetation. Avoid permanent removal of these occupied
habitats wherever possible. Where vegetation removal/maintenance must take place, wait until the
nesting fauna have moved on.
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 25
Appropriately designed sediment and erosion controls should be installed and maintained during
excavation works to prevent any potential sediment runoff entering Myles Dunphy Reserve.
There is potential to improve the quality of the Exotic closed woodland community either side of the
overbridge alignment by engaging a bush regeneration contractor to remove exotic species,
particularly noxious weeds from this area, and revegetate these areas with endemic native species.
On the eastern side of the station:
– The potential for a “green wall” to the forecourt to soften any areas of blank stair wall would
be investigated. Proposed species would be a combination of natives and introduced
species selected to complement the existing vegetation within the Douglas Cross Gardens.
– A terraced rock garden bed would be provided to capture the change of grade between the
forecourt and Douglas Cross Gardens
On the western side of the station:
– Existing vegetation would be retained where possible.
– The disturbed embankments would be re-vegetated. Advanced trees would be planted to
filter views, provide a gateway to the station overpass entrance and reduce the scale of the
proposed overpass.
In the commuter car park:
– Existing vegetation would be retained and protected where possible.
– To soften hard treatments, low planting would be introduced.
Generally, new vegetation will be used to replace vegetation removed, in line with Transport Projects Division
(TPD) Vegetation Offset Guide. Plants species used in revegetation for the Proposal would be based on a
number of guiding documents and existing site plant species. Native and endemic species would be used
where appropriate. There would be compliance with appropriate standards for soils, mulches etc.
Details of the trees to be removed, along with the likelihood or removal, is outlined in Appendix 3. The
likelihood of removal has been determined based on the drawings provided to Biosis and are therefore mays
be subject to change. Based on the small size and lack of community structure of the patch of trees to be
removed, it is considered appropriate to use the TfNSW Single tree offsets (TfNSW, 2013) calculator to
determine the offset requirement for this proposal. Based on the TAP-1822-AR-0006 drawing, it has been
determined that three large trees (DBH >60 centimetres) and 21 medium trees (DBH 15 to 60 centimetres)
will require removal. In accordance with the Single tree offsets calculator, a minimum of 112 trees should be
planted to compensate the vegetation to be cleared. Based on trees present within native vegetation
communities on-site it is recommended a mix of Spotted Gum, Sydney Red Gum, Tallowood and Turpentine
are used.
Mulga Road
Oatley Avenue
Oatle
y Para
de
Rive r
Road
Frederick Street
River Road
River
Road
River
Road
Illawarr
a Railw
ay
Proposedbridge
and lifts
Proposedcommuter
carpark
Acknowledgement: Imagery provided by Transport for New South Wales
Matter: 17612Date: 03 March 2014,Checked by: NMG, Drawn by: JMS, Last edited by: ngarveyLocation:P:\17600s\17612\Mapping\
LegendStudy AreaSubject Site
Proposed construction zones/compounds/laydown areasCategory 1 - IdealCategory 2 - PreferredCategory 3 - PotentialCategory 4 - No go zone
Scale 1:1,500 @ A4, GDA 1994 MGA Zone 56
0 10 20 30 40
Metres ±Biosis Pty LtdBallarat, Brisbane, Canberra, Melbourne, Sydney, Wangaratta & Wollongong
k
k
k
kk
k
k
kk
k
k
k
kkk
kk
kkkkk
kkk
kkk
k
k
k
kkkk
kkkkkkkk
1
2
3
54
6
7
8
9
10
13
17
141516
1112
1819202122
2324
2526
272829
30
31
363738
39
4041 4243 3233 3435
34m
26m
22m
30m
22m
36m
38m
34m
20m
30m
24m 40m
32m
32m
26m
32m
30m
34m
28m
38m
36m
34m
30m
Frederick Street
Mulga Road
Oatle
y Para
de
Rive r
Road
River
Road
Oatley Avenue
River Road
River
Road
Illawarra RailwayProposed
bridgeand lifts
Proposedcommuter
carpark
0 8 16 24 32 40
MetresMatter: 17612Date: 26 February 2014, Checked by: NMG, Drawn by: JMS, Last edited by: ngarveyLocation:P:\17600s\17612\Mapping\17612_F6_Treestoberemoved
Biosis Pty LtdBallarat, Brisbane, Canberra, Melbourne, Sydney, Wangaratta & Wollongong ±
Acknowledgements: Imagery provided by Transport for New South Wales
Legend<all other values>
LikelihoodOfRemovalk Highk Lowk Moderate
Approximate alignment of exclusion fencingSubject SiteStudy Area
Scale 1:800 @ A3Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 56
Figure 6: Trees to be removed
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 28
5. 4. Biodiversity Legislation and Government Policy
This section provides an assessment of the project against key biodiversity legislation and government policy.
Where available, links to further information are provided. This section does not describe the legislation and
policy in detail and guidance provided here does not constitute legal advice.
5.1 Commonwealth
5.1.1 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, 1999
The EPBC Act applies to developments and associated activities that have the potential to significantly impact
on Matters of National Environmental Significance (NES) protected under the Act.
Link for further information including a guide to the referral process is available at:
http://www.environment.gov.au/epbc/index.html
Matters of NES relevant to the project are summarised in Table 9. It includes an assessment against the EPBC
Act policy statements published by the Australian Government which provide guidance on the practical
application of EPBC Act including.
Table 9: Assessment of the project against the EPBC Act
Matter of NES Project specifics Assessment against Guidelines
Threatened
species and
ecological
communities
59 fauna and 24 flora species have been
recorded or predicted to occur in the
project search area. The likelihood of these
species occurring in the study area is
assessed in Appendix 1 (flora) and
Appendix 2 (fauna).
None of these species are likely to occur
and the proposed upgrade is unlikely to
constitute a significant impact.
Migratory
species
35 migratory species have been recorded
or predicted to occur in the locality.
While some of these species would be
expected to use the study area on
occasions, and some of them may do so
regularly or may be resident, it is not
considered to provide important habitat
for an ecologically significant proportion of
any of these species.
On the basis of criteria outlined in the relevant Significant Impact Guidelines it is considered unlikely that a
significant impact on a Matter of National Environmental Significance would result from the proposed action.
A referral to the Australian Government Minister for the Environment to determine whether the action
requires approval under the EPBC Act is not required.
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 29
5.2 State
5.2.1 Threatened Species Conservation Act, 1995
The TSC Act provides for the protection and conservation of biodiversity in NSW through the listing of
threatened species, populations and communities; key threatening processes; and critical habitat for
threatened species, populations and communities.
Native vegetation within the study area is not a listed community; however contains threatened flora or fauna
species, or habitat for them. Impacts to threatened species, populations and communities must be assessed
through the Assessment of Significance (formerly known as the “7-part test”) process under Section 5A of the
EP&A Act (refer to Section 5.2.2 below).
Habitat critical to the survival of an endangered or critically endangered species, population or ecological
community can be identified under the TSC Act and listed on the Register of Critical Habitat kept by the OEH.
The study area does not contain declared ‘critical habitat’.
A licence to harm/pick/damage habitat of a threatened species, population or community or damage critical
habitat is / is not required.
Key threatening processes, defined as a process that threatens, or could threaten, the survival or evolutionary
development of species, populations or ecological communities, are identified under the TSC Act and
considered during the Assessment of Significance. The proposed upgrade has the potential to constitute or
exacerbate KTPs outlined in Table 10.
Table 10: Key threatening processes listed under the TSC Act, likely to be constituted or
exacerbated by the proposed upgrade
Key threatening process Activity like to constitute or exacerbate the KTP
Clearing of native vegetation The proposal will result in the clearing of individual
remnant trees and shrubs in the modified eucalypt
woodland communities and exotic closed woodland
community.
Infection of native plants by Phytophthora
cinnamomi
No Phytophthora was identified during the site
assessment, however the introduction of personnel
and construction equipment to the subject site has
the potential to establish it.
Introduction and Establishment of Exotic Rust
Fungi of the order Pucciniales pathogenic on
plants of the family Myrtacea
No exotic rust fungi was identified during the site
survey, however the introduction of personnel and
construction equipment to the subject site has the
potential to establish it.
Invasion and establishment of exotic vines and
scramblers
Exotic vines and scramblers including Moth Vine,
Morning Glory and Asparagus Fern are present on
site and the construction work has the potential to
further spread these.
Invasion of native plant communities by African
Olive Olea europaea L. subsp. cuspidate
No African Olive was recorded within the study area
however the proposed upgrade has the potential to
introduce it.
Invasion, establishment and spread of Lantana
camara
Lantana was recorded across the study area but
particularly on the western rail embankment around
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 30
Key threatening process Activity like to constitute or exacerbate the KTP
Boongarra Reserve.
Invasion of native plant communities by
Chrysanthemoides monilifera (bitou bush and
boneseed)
Boneseed was recorded along the western fence of
the commuter carpark and could be spread by the
proposed upgrade.
Invasion of native plant communities by exotic
perennial grasses
Various exotic grasses were identified during the site
assessment, particularly in the mown exotic grass
and ornamental plantings community
Loss and degradation of native plant and animal
habitat by invasion of escaped garden plants,
including aquatic plants
Garden escapee species were recorded across the
study area and were dominant in the mown exotic
grass and ornamental planting community.
Loss of hollow-bearing trees three HBTs are proposed to be removed as part of
the Oatley station upgrade, and there is considered
to be some potential for roosting habitat of
threatened microbats to be impacted.
The proposed upgrade does have the potential to trigger a number of KTP's; however based on the
historically disturbed nature of the work and the restricted nature of vegetation removal, it is unlikely that any
potential increase will be significant.
5.2.2 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979
The EP&A Act was enacted to encourage the proper consideration and management of impacts of proposed
development or land-use changes on the environment (both natural and built) and the community. The Act is
administered by the NSW Department of Planning and Infrastructure.
Sections of the EP&A Act of primary relevance to the natural environment are considered further below in
relation to the current proposal.
5.2.2.1 Assessment of Significance (Section 5A)
Section 5A of the EP&A Act requires proponents and consent authorities to consider if a development will
have a significant effect on threatened species, populations or communities listed under the TSC Act and FM
Act. Section 5A (and Section 9A of the TSC Act) outlines seven factors that must be taken into account in an
AoS. Where any AoS determines that a development will result in a significant effect to a threatened species,
population or community a Species Impact Statement (SIS) is required.
Table 11 summarises the potential for the proposed development to have a significant effect on the
threatened flora and fauna species, populations or communities deemed to have a medium or greater
likelihood of occurrence within the study area (refer to Section3.4) and determines the need for an AoS under
Section 5A of the EP&A Act.
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 31
Table 11: Potential for impacts to threatened species listed on the TSC Act
Name EPBC
Act
TSC
Act
Habitat
Values
within
study area
Potential Impacts on Threatened
Species
Impact
Assessment
Required? Adversely
affect
stages of
the
lifecycle
of the
species?
Loss or
disturbance
of limiting
foraging or
breeding
resources?
Fragmentation
of limiting
habitat?
Ecological communities - no threatened ecological communities were identified as having potential to occur
within the study area.
Flora species – no threatened flora species were identified as having potential to occur within the study
area.
Fauna species
Eastern Freetail
Bat
- V1 Potential
roosting
resources in
HBTs to be
removed
within the
study area
Potential
(unlikely)
No No No
*A significant impact is not likely to result from the proposal as a result of NSW listed biota, therefore an SIS is not required.
Assessments of Significance have been prepared for those species, populations or communities that are
deemed likely to be subject to negative impacts and are provided in Appendix 1 and 2. They indicate that a
significant impact is not likely to result from the proposal. A Species Impact Statement is therefore not
required.
5.2.2.2 State Environmental Planning Policies
State Environmental Planning Policies (SEPPs) outline policy objectives relevant to state wide issues. No SEPPs
are relevant to the current development
5.2.3 Native Vegetation Act, 2003
The NV Act provides for, encourages and promotes the management of native vegetation on a regional basis.
Under the NV Act no clearing of native vegetation is allowed except in accordance with prior development
consent from the relevant Council or under a Property Vegetation Plan (PVP) approved by the relevant
Catchment Management Authority.
Under Part 3 of Schedule 1 of the NV Act, Kogarah and Hurstville LGAs are classified as an urban area and
exempt from the provisions of the Act.
5.2.4 Noxious Weeds Act 1993
The NW Act was enacted to provide for the identification, classification and control of noxious weeds. Plants
declared as noxious weeds are currently listed under Weed Control Order No. 28 Declaring Certain Plants to
be Noxious Weeds published in the New South Wales Government Gazette No. 97. (Department of Premier
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 32
and Cabinet, 2011). Link for further information: http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/aboutus/about/legislation-
acts/noxious-weeds
Five species listed as noxious within the Kogarah and Hurstville City Council LGAs were recorded within the
study area (DPI, 2013). The details of these along with the legal requirements are outlined in Section 3.5; Table
8. A full list of exotic species, including declared noxious weeds identified in the study area are listed in
Appendix 1.
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 33
6. Conclusion
The study area supports two native (Degraded hinterland sandstone gully forest and Modified eucalypt
woodland) and two exotic (Mown exotic grasses and ornamental plantings and Exotic closed woodland)
vegetation communities. These vegetation communities are considered to be in poor condition due to past
disturbance.
The study area is of minimal value for threatened species, with no threatened flora species recorded or
considered likely to occur. The study area supports potential foraging and breeding habitat for one
threatened fauna species; suitable microbat hollows for the Eastern Freetail-bat were observed in a number
of trees surrounding the carpark, including two Sydney Red Gums, and one Spotted Gum.
No threatened ecological communities were recorded.
Five species listed as noxious within Hurstville and Kogarah City Council LGAs were recorded within the study
area.
The proposed upgrade of Oatley station will result in the removal of 0.04 ha of native vegetation (Modified
eucalypt woodland) and 12 native trees, including removal of a number of trees from the commuter carpark.
This includes potential roosting habitat for microbats, including the Eastern Freetail-bat.
In accordance with the Vegetation Offset Guide (TfNSW, 2013), a minimum of 112 native endemic trees
should be planted to compensate the required vegetation clearance. It is recommended that native species
such as Spotted Gum, Sydney Red Gum, Tallowood and Turpentine are used.
In addition to the impacts outlined above, various compound areas will be required for the storage of
equipment and infrastructure. The location of these compound areas is yet to be confirmed; however
potential areas within the study area have been identified and categorised based on their ecological values
(Figure 5).
The proposed bank stabilisation works are unlikely to result in any impacts to native vegetation or fauna
habitat; however the bank may currently be stabilised by mature trees and shrubs, and it is recommended
that the stumps of these trees and shrubs are kept in place to provide stability.
The overall impact of the proposed upgrade of Oatley station to native flora and fauna is considered to be
low. Measures to avoid and mitigate impacts are outlined in Section 4.
It is unlikely that the proposed works will result in a significant impact to threatened species, populations or
communities and additional approvals are not required.
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 34
References
DS&P 2013. Showing Sheet Layout for Detail and Levels of Oatley Railway Station and Interchange Facilities.
Drawing 33700A01.dwg.
GHD 2012. Transport Access Program: Oatley Station Precinct – Ecological Constraints Assessment
GHD 2013. Oatley Station Precinct Accessibility Upgrade – Proposed Site Plan. Drawing TAP-1822-AR-0006.
Hanson CE, 2008. High Speed Train Noise Effects on Wildlife and Domestic Livestock in Schulte-Werning et al
(Eds) Noise and Vibration Mitigation. NNFM pgs 26-32. Accessed online 28/1/2014 -
http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-74893-9_4#page-2
Hurstville City Council. 2012, Draft Local Environmental Plan
Hurstville City Council. 2012, Draft Local Environmental Plan - Land Zoning Map - Sheet LZN_006
Hurstville City Council. 2013, Myles Dunphy Reserve and Wetland Plan of Management
Kogarah City Council. 2012, Draft Local Environmental Plan
Kogarah City Council. 2012, Draft Local Environmental Plan - Land Zoning MapSheet LZN_004
NSW Scientific Committee 2012. Sydney Turpentine-Ironbark Forest - Determination to make a minor
amendment to Part 3 of Schedule 1 of the Threatened Species Conservation Act
NSW Scientific Committee 2007. Southern Sydney sheltered forest on transitional sandstone soils in the
Sydney Basin Bioregion - endangered ecological community listing
NSW Scientific Committee 1998. Sydney Turpentine-Ironbark Forest - endangered ecological community
listing
OEH 2012. Southern Sydney sheltered forest on transitional sandstone soils in the Sydney Basin Bioregion -
profile
OEH 2013. Sydney Turpentine-Ironbark Forest – profile
Schell CB &Burgin S. 2003. Swimming against the current: the Brown Striped Marsh Frog Limnodynastes
peronii success story. Australian Zoologist 32 (3): 401-5.
SMCMA 2009, The native vegetation of the Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority area
TfNSW, 2013, Vegetation Offset Guide and associated vegetation offset calculator tool.
Tozer et. al. 2010. Native vegetation of southeast NSW: a revised classification and map for the coast and
eastern tablelands
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 35
Appendices
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 36
Appendix 1: Flora
Notes to tables:
EPBC Act:
CR - Critically Endangered
EN - Endangered
VU - Vulnerable
TSC Act:
C1 – critically endangered
E1 – endangered (Part 1, Schedule 1)
E2 – endangered (Part 2, Schedule 1)
E4 – presumed extinct (Part 4, Schedule 1)
V1 – vulnerable (Part 1, Schedule 2)
# - Native species outside natural range
** - noxious weed species declared under the
Noxious Weeds Act
Noxious weed status:
SP State prohibited species (Class 1)
RP Regionally prohibited species (Class 2)
RC Regionally controlled species (Class 3)
RR Regionally restricted species (Class 4)
R Restricted plant (Class 5)
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 37
A1.1 Flora species recorded from the study area
Table 12: Flora species recorded from the study area.
Family Scientific Name Common Name
Native species
Aizoaceae Carpobrotus glaucescens Pigface
Casuarinaceae Casuarina glauca Swamp Oak
Cyatheaceae Cyathea australis Rough Treefern
Lamiaceae Westringia fruticosa Coastal Rosemary
Lomandraceae Lomandra longifolia Spiny-headed Mat-rush
Myrtaceae Angophora costata Sydney Red Gum
Myrtaceae Corymbia maculata Spotted Gum
Myrtaceae Eucalyptus microcorys Tallowwood
Myrtaceae Eucalyptus pilularis Blackbutt
Myrtaceae Eucalyptus racemosa Narrow-leaved Scribbly Gum
Myrtaceae Lophostemon confertus Brush Box
Myrtaceae Syncarpia glomulifera Turpentine
Phyllanthaceae Glochidion ferdinandi Cheese Tree
Thelypteridaceae Christella dentata Binung
Exotic Species
Adoxaceae Viburnum japonicum
Agavaceae Agave sp Century Plant
Alliaceae Agapanthus praecox Agapanthus
Amaranthaceae Gomphrena celosioides Gomphrena Weed
Amaryllidaceae Amaryllis belladonna Belladonna Lily
Anacardiaceae Schinus areira Pepper Tree
Apiaceae Foeniculum vulgare Fennel
Apocynaceae Araujia sericifera Moth Vine
Apocynaceae Trachelospermum jasminoides
Araceae Monstera deliciosa Fruit Salad Plant
Araliaceae Hedera helix English Ivy
Araliaceae Schefflera actinophylla Umbrella Tree
Arecaceae Syagrus romanzoffiana Cocos Palm
Asparagaceae Asparagus aethiopicus Asparagus Fern
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 38
Family Scientific Name Common Name
Asphodelaceae Aloe ciliaris
Asteraceae Ageratina adenophora Crofton Weed
Asteraceae Bidens pilosa Cobbler's Pegs
Asteraceae Chrysanthemoides monilifera subsp. monilifera Boneseed
Asteraceae Erigeron karvinskianus Bony-tip Fleabane
Asteraceae Gazania linearis
Asteraceae Hypochaeris radicata Catsear
Asteraceae Sonchus asper Prickly Sowthistle
Asteraceae Taraxacum officinale Dandelion
Bignoniaceae Jacaranda mimosifolia Jacaranda
Cannaceae Canna x generalis
Convolvulaceae Ipomoea indica Morning Glory
Cupressaceae Cupressus macrocarpa Monterey Cypress
Cupressaceae X Cupressocyparis leylandii
Cyperaceae Cyperus sp
Fabaceae (Faboideae) Genista monspessulana Montpellier Broom
Fabaceae (Faboideae) Medicago polymorpha Burr Medic
Fabaceae (Faboideae) Trifolium repens White Clover
Hemerocallidaceae Hemerocallis sp Daylilly
Hydrangeaceae Hydrangea sp
Lamiaceae Salvia sp Woolly Sage
Lauraceae Cinnamomum camphora Camphor Laurel
Malaceae Photinia sp Japanese Photinia
Malvaceae Modiola caroliniana Red-flowered Mallow
Myrsinaceae Anagallis arvensis Scarlet Pimpernel
Ochnaceae Ochna serrulata Mickey Mouse Plant
Oleaceae Ligustrum sinense Small-leaved Privet
Onagraceae Gaura lindheimeri
Oxalidaceae Oxalis sp
Poaceae Avena fatua Wild Oats
Poaceae Bromus cartharticus Prairie Grass
Poaceae Chloris gayana Rhodes Grass
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 39
Family Scientific Name Common Name
Poaceae Cynodon dactylon Common Couch
Poaceae Digitaria ciliaris Summer Grass
Poaceae Ehrharta erecta Panic Veldtgrass
Poaceae Eleusine tristachya Goose Grass
Poaceae Eragrostis pilosa Soft Lovegrass
Poaceae Paspalum dilatatum Paspalum
Poaceae Stenotaphrum secundatum Buffalo Grass
Polygonaceae Acetosa sagittata Rambling Dock
Punicaceae Punica granatum Pomegranite
Rutaceae Murraya paniculata
Salicaceae Populus nigra Lombardy Poplar
Solanaceae Cestrum parqui Green Cestrum
Solanaceae Solanum nigrum Black-berry Nightshade
Strelitziaceae Strelitzia reginae
Tropaeolaceae Tropaeolum majus Nasturtium
Ulmaceae Ulmus parvifolia Chinese Elm
Verbenaceae Lantana camara Lantana
Caprifoliaceae Abelia sp
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 40
A1.2 Significant flora species
The following table includes a list of the significant flora species that have potential to occur within the study area. The list of species is sourced from the Atlas of
NSW Wildife and the Protected Matters Search Tool (DSEWPaC; accessed on 10/01/2014).
Likelihood of
occurrence
Potential criteria
High Species recorded on site during current or previous assessment/s.
Aquatic species recorded from connected waterbodies in close proximity to the site during current or previous assessment/s.
Sufficient good quality habitat is present on site or in connected waterbodies in close proximity to the site (aquatic species).
Site is within species natural distributional range (if known).
Species has been recorded within 5 km or from the relevant catchment/basin.
Medium Records of terrestrial species within 5 km of the site or of aquatic species in the relevant basin/neighbouring basin.
Habitat limited in its capacity to support the species due to extent, quality, or isolation.
Low No records within 5 km of the site or for aquatic species, the relevant basin/neighbouring basin.
Marginal habitat present (low quality & extent).
Substantial loss of habitat since any previous record(s).
Negligible Habitat not present on site
Habitat for aquatic species not present in connected waterbodies in close proximity to the site.
Habitat present but sufficient targeted survey has been conducted at an optimal time of year and species wasn’t recorded.
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 41
Table 13: Significant flora species recorded / predicted to occur within 5 km of the study area.
Scientific name Common name EPBC
Act
TSC
Act
Most
Recent
Record
Likelihood
of
occurrence
Rationale for
likelihood
Habitat description
Acacia
bynoeana
Bynoe's Wattle VU E1 1898 Low Soil preferences and
vegetation associations
not present within the
study area.
Acacia bynoeana is found in central eastern NSW, in
the following catchment regions –
Hawkesbury/Nepean, Hunter/Central Rivers, Southern
Rivers, and Sydney Metropolitan. More specifically it is
found from the Hunter District (Morisset) south to the
Southern Highlands and west to the Blue Mountains. It
has recently been found in the Colymea and Parma
Creek areas west of Nowra.
It seems to prefer open, sometimes slightly disturbed
sites such as trail margins, edges of roadside spoil
mounds and recently burnt patches.
It grows in sandy clay soils often containing ironstone
gravels. Main vegetation types include heath or dry
sclerophyll forest on sandy soils.
Associated overstorey species include Corymbia
gummifera, Corymbia maculata, Eucalyptus
parramattensis, Banksia serrata and Angophora bakeri.
Flowering period is mainly summer.
Acacia
prominens
Gosford Wattle E2 2008 Low Populations are known
from the Oatley area;
however the disturbed
nature of soil profiles
and high recruitment
of weeds mean it is
unlikely to occur.
Occurs at a few sites along the railway line at
Penshurst, at Carss Bush Park, Carss Park and there is
an unconfirmed siting at Oatley Park, Oatley. Grows in
open situations on clayey or sandy soils.
Flowers from July to September and pods are
produced in September-October.
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 42
Scientific name Common name EPBC
Act
TSC
Act
Most
Recent
Record
Likelihood
of
occurrence
Rationale for
likelihood
Habitat description
Acacia
pubescens
Downy Wattle VU V 2010/# Low The species known
from around the
Oatley area; however
the disturbed nature of
soil profiles and high
recruitment of weeds
mean it is unlikely to
occur.
Acacia pubescens is found in Sydney Metropolitan, and
Hawkesbury/Nepean Catchment Management Region,
with concentrated populations around the Bankstown-
Fairfield-Rookwood area and the Pitt Town area, with
outliers occurring at Barden Ridge, Oakdale and
Mountain Lagoon.
It occurs on alluviums, shales and at the intergrade
between shales and sandstones. The soils are
characteristically gravelly soils, often with ironstone.
The species occurs in open woodland and forest, in a
variety of plant communities, including Cooks River/
Castlereagh Ironbark Forest, Shale/ Gravel Transition
Forest and Cumberland Plain Woodland.
Flowers from August to October. The pods mature in
October to December.
Acacia
terminalis
subsp.
terminalis
Sunshine Wattle EN E1 1999 Low The study area is on
the edge of the natural
range for Sunshine
Wattle and soil
association is not
correct.
Occurs in the Sydney Metropolitan Catchment
Authority Region. It has very limited distribution
between Botany Bay to the northern foreshore of Port
Jackson.
Sunshine Wattle occurs in Coastal scrub and Dry
Sclerophyll forest.
Allocasuarina
glareicola
EN E1 # Negligible Soil and vegetation
associations are not
correct. Not previously
recorded within 5 km.
Found in the Hawkesbury/Nepean and Sydney
Metropolitan Catchment Authority Regions. Primarily
restricted to the Richmond (NW Cumberland Plain)
district, but with an outlier population found at
Voyager Point, Liverpool.
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 43
Scientific name Common name EPBC
Act
TSC
Act
Most
Recent
Record
Likelihood
of
occurrence
Rationale for
likelihood
Habitat description
Grows in Castlereagh woodland on lateritic soil. Also
found in Dry Sclerophyll forest/Woodland. Associated
species include Eucalyptus parramattensis, Eucalyptus
fibrosa, Angophora bakeri, Eucalyptus sclerophylla and
Melaleuca decora. Common associated understorey
species include Melaleuca nodosa, Hakea dactyloides,
Hakea sericea, Dillwynia tenuifolia, Micromyrtus
minutiflora, Acacia elongata, Acacia brownei, Themeda
australis and Xanthorrhoea minor.
Asterolasia
elegans
EN E1 # Negligible Not previously
recorded within the
study area and
generally occurs
further north on
sandstone dominated
soils.
Occurs north of Sydney, in the Baulkham Hills,
Hawkesbury and Hornsby local government areas. Also
likely to occur in the western part of Gosford LGA.
Known from only six populations in the catchments of
the Colo and Hawkesbury Rivers, only one of which is
wholly within a conservation reserve. Found in
sheltered forests on mid- to lower slopes and valleys
which support sheltered forest on Hawkesbury
Sandstone. The canopy at known sites includes
Syncarpia glomulifera, Angophora costata, Eucalyptus
piperita, Allocasuarina torulosa and Ceratopetalum
gummiferum. The species is considered to be fire
sensitive and reliant on seed germination after
disturbance to maintain populations. A soil seedbank
appears to be established by this species, so for a
number of years following fire or other disturbance the
species may not be apparent, but be present only as
seed in the soil. The size of the seedbank depends not
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 44
Scientific name Common name EPBC
Act
TSC
Act
Most
Recent
Record
Likelihood
of
occurrence
Rationale for
likelihood
Habitat description
only on the amount of seed contributed by mature
plants each season, but on the level of dormancy of the
seed which can vary from year to year. The longevity of
each crop of seed in the soil is perhaps 5 - 10 years.
Caladenia
tessellata
Thick Lip Spider
Orchid
VU E1 2008/# Low Unlikely to be found in
such disturbed
vegetation.
Caladenia tessellata is found in the following
Catchment Management Regions Sydney Metropolitan,
Southern Rivers, Hawkesbury/Nepean, and
Hunter/Central Rivers. Currently known from three
disjunct areas: Braidwood on southern tablelands,
Ulladulla on the south coast and three populations in
Wyong area on the Central Coast. It is generally found
in grassy, dry sclerophyll forests/woodland, particularly
those associated with clay loam, or sandy soils.
However, there is one population at Braidwood in
lowland on stony soil. This species only grows in very
dense shrubbery in coastal areas.
Flowers appear between September and November,
but generally late September or early October in extant
southern populations.
Cryptostylis
hunteriana
Leafless Tongue
Orchid
VU V # Negligible Unlikely to be found in
such disturbed
vegetation. Not
previously recorded
within 5 km .
This species typically grows in swamp-heath on sandy
soils chiefly in coastal districts but has also been
recorded on steep bare hillsides. Within the Central
Coast bioregion, this species has been recorded within
Coastal Plains Smooth-barked Apple Woodland and
Coastal Plains Scribbly Gum Woodland. This species
does not appear to have well defined habitat
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 45
Scientific name Common name EPBC
Act
TSC
Act
Most
Recent
Record
Likelihood
of
occurrence
Rationale for
likelihood
Habitat description
preferences and is known from a range of
communities, including swamp-heath and woodland.
The larger populations typically occur in woodland
dominated by Eucalyptus sclerophylla, E. sieberi,
Corymbia gummifera and Allocasuarina littoralis;
appears to prefer open areas in the understorey of this
community and is often found in association with the
Cryptostylus subulata.
It occurs in the following Catchment Management
Regions Hawkesbury/Nepean, Hunter/Central Rivers,
Northern Rivers and Southern Rivers. Inconsistent
flowring times Dec-February; Jan-February (in Victoria)
Deyeuxia
appressa
EN E1 1930/# Negligible Not recently recorded
in the area and
considered likely
extinct.
Only occurs in Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Region.
A highly endemic known only from two pre-1942
records in the Sydney area. Was first collected in 1930
at Herne Bay, Saltpan Creek. Was then collected in
1941 from Killara, near Hornsby. Has not been
collected since and may now be extinct. Given that D.
appressa hasn’t been seen in over 60 years, almost
nothing is known of the species' habitat and ecology.
Flowers spring to summer and is mesophytic (grows in
moist conditions).
Epacris
purpurascens
var.
purpurascens
V 2010 Low Not usually associated
with sandstone soils or
such disturbed sites.
Located in the Hawkesbury/Nepean, Hunter/Central
Rivers/and Sydney Metropolitan catchment authority
region - from Gosford in the north, to Narrabeen in the
east, Silverdale in the west and Avon Dam vicinity in the
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 46
Scientific name Common name EPBC
Act
TSC
Act
Most
Recent
Record
Likelihood
of
occurrence
Rationale for
likelihood
Habitat description
South.
Grevillea
parviflora
subsp.
parviflora
Small-flower
Grevillea
VU V # Negligible Not previously
recorded within 5 km
and habitat
preferences not
present.
Located in Hawkesbury/Nepean, Hunter/Central Rivers
and Sydney Metropolitan Catchment. Sporadically
distributed throughout the Sydney Basin with the main
occurrence centred in Picton, Appin, Wedderburn and
Bargo. Northern populations are found in the Lower
Hunter Valley. To the west of Sydney, small populations
occur at Kemps Creek & Voyager Point. Grevillea
parviflora ssp. parviflora grows on sandy clay loam soils,
often with ironstone gravels. Soils are mostly derived
from Tertiary sands or alluvium and from the
Mittagong Formation with alternating bands of shale
and fine-grained sandstones. Grevillea parviflora subsp.
parviflora is found on crests, upper slopes or flat plains
in both low-lying areas and on higher topography. The
plant prefers open habitat conditions with the largest
populations in open woodland and along exposed
roadside areas.
G. parviflora subsp. parviflora has been recorded in a
range of vegetation types from heath and shrubby
woodland to open forest. Canopy species vary greatly
with community type but generally are species that
favour soils with a strong lateritic influence including
Eucalyptus fibrosa, E. parramattensis, Angophora bakeri
and Eucalyptus sclerophylla.
Flowering has been recorded between July to
December as well as April-May.
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 47
Scientific name Common name EPBC
Act
TSC
Act
Most
Recent
Record
Likelihood
of
occurrence
Rationale for
likelihood
Habitat description
Hibbertia stricta
subsp. furcatula
E1 2011 Low This species has a
discreet range and
habitat at preference
which are not present
within the vegetation
communities within
the study area.
Hibbertia stricta subsp. furcatula is a small shrub
growing to 1.3 m in height and up to 70 cm wide. It is
known to occur in two populations, one in the
southern outskirts of Sydney, and one near Nowra on
the mid-South Coast of NSW. The Southern Sydney
population occurs on both sides of the Woronora River
gorge, near Loftus and in Royal National Park. The
southern population is mainly in the vicinity of Nowra.
Leucopogon
exolasius
Woronora
Beard-heath
VU V 1901 Low Although broadly
suitable habitat may
have previously been
present, likelihood is
low due to the
degraded nature of the
study area.
Occurs in Hawkesbury/Nepean and Sydney
Metropolitan Catchment, restricted to the Woronora
and Grose Rivers. The plant occurs in woodland on
sandy alluvium and rocky sandstone hillsides near
creeks, and on low nutrient soils. Flowering occurs in
August and September. Associated species include
Eucalyptus piperita and E. sieberi and the shrubs
Pultenaea flexilis, Leptospermum trinervium and Dillwynia
retorta.
Maundia
triglochinoides
V 1903 Negligible This species requires
swampy, permanently
inundated habitat
which was not present
in the study area.
Maundia triglochinoides is restricted to Coastal NSW
and extending into southern Queensland. The current
southern limit is Wyong; former sites around Sydney
are now extinct. Catchment Regions include
Hunter/Central Rivers, Northern Rivers and Sydney
Metro. Maundia triglochinoides occurs in permanent
swamps and wetlands on the central and north coasts
of New South Wales.
Melaleuca Biconvex VU V # Negligible None previously Biconvex Paperbark is only found in NSW, with
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 48
Scientific name Common name EPBC
Act
TSC
Act
Most
Recent
Record
Likelihood
of
occurrence
Rationale for
likelihood
Habitat description
biconvexa Paperbark recorded within 5 km
of the study area and
there is no preferred
damp alluvial habitat
present.
scattered and dispersed populations found in the Jervis
Bay area in the south and the Gosford-Wyong area in
the north. Catchment regions include: Hunter/Central
Rivers, Hawkesbury/Nepean, Southern Rivers, and
Northern River Catchments.
Biconvex Paperbark generally grows in damp places,
often near streams or low-lying areas on alluvial soils
of low slopes or sheltered aspects.
Flowering occurs over just 3-4 weeks in September and
October.
Melaleuca
deanei
Deane's
Paperbark
VU V 1899 Low No recent records and
associated soils not
present.
Melaleuca deanei occurs in Catchment Management
Regions Hawkesbury/Nepean, Southern Rivers, and
Sydney Metropolitan. Distinctly it occurs in the Ku-ring-
gai/Berowra and Holsworthy/Wedderburn areas. There
are also more isolated occurrences at Springwood (in
the Blue Mountains), Wollemi National Park, Yalwal
(west of Nowra) and Central Coast (Hawkesbury River)
areas. The species grows in wet heath on sandstone
and Dry Sclerophyll Forests. Flowers appear in summer
but seed production appears to be small and
consequently the species exhibits a limited capacity to
regenerate.
Pelargonium sp.
striatellum
(G.W.Carr
10345)
Omeo Stork's Bill EN # Negligible None previously
recorded within 5 km
of the study area and
the modified nature
Pelargonium sp. Striatellum (G.W.Carr 10345) is a
tufted perennial herb. It has a basal leaf rosette and
leafy flowering stems which grow to 15 cm tall, with
fleshy and often extensively branched rhizomes giving
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 49
Scientific name Common name EPBC
Act
TSC
Act
Most
Recent
Record
Likelihood
of
occurrence
Rationale for
likelihood
Habitat description
does not provide
potential habitat.
rise to individual plants (ramets) in clonal colonies. The
species is known to occur in habitat usually located just
above the high water level of irregularly inundated or
ephemeral lakes. During dry periods, the species is
known to colonise exposed lake beds. Pelargonium sp.
Striatellum (G.W.Carr 10345) occurs within the South
Eastern Highlands and South East Corner IBRA
Bioregions and the Hawkesbury-Nepean,
Murrumbidgee, Southern Rivers and North East
Natural Resource Management Regions.
Persoonia
hirsuta
Hairy Geebung EN E1 2007/# Low Highly unlikely to occur
in disturbed closed
woodland or
landscaped areas.
Occurs from Gosford to Royal NP and in the Putty
district from Hill Top to Glen Davis where it grows in
woodland to dry sclerophyll forest on sandstone or
rarely on shale. Two subspecies are recognised, P.
hirsuta ssp. hirsuta (Gosford to Berowra and Manly to
Royal NP) and P. hirsuta ssp. evoluta (Blue Mountains,
Woronora Plateau and Southern Highlands). Found in
sandy soils in dry sclerophyll open forest, woodland
and heath on sandstone and shale-sandstone
transition areas.
Pimelea
curviflora var.
curviflora
VU V # Low None previously
recorded within 5 km
of the study area and
the modified nature
does not provide
potential habitat.
Occurring in Hawkesbury/Nepean and Sydney
Metropolitan Catchment Authority Areas. Confined to
the coastal area of Sydney between northern Sydney in
the south and Maroota in the north-west.
Occurs on lateritic soils and shale-sandstone transition
soils on ridge tops in woodland. Associated with Dry
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 50
Scientific name Common name EPBC
Act
TSC
Act
Most
Recent
Record
Likelihood
of
occurrence
Rationale for
likelihood
Habitat description
Sclerophyll forests and Coastal valley grassy
woodlands.
Has an inconspicuous cryptic habit as it is fine and
scraggly and often grows amongst dense grasses and
sedges. It may not always be visible at a site as it
appears to survive for some time without any foliage
after fire or grazing, relying on energy reserves in its
tuberous roots.
Flowers October to May.
Pimelea spicata Spiked Rice-
flower
EN E1 # Negligible None previously
recorded within 5 km
of the study area and
no communities or
species associated with
Spiked Rice-flower are
present within the
study area.
Once widespread on the Cumberland Plain, Pimelea
spicata occurs in two disjunct areas, the Cumberland
Plain and the Illawarra. Catchment areas are
Hawkesbury/Nepean, Southern Rivers, and Sydney
Metropolitan Catchment.
In western Sydney, P. spicata occurs on an undulating
topography of substrates derived from Wianamatta
Shale in areas supporting, or that previously
supported, the Cumberland Plain Woodland
Vegetation Community. Associated species include:
Eucalyptus moluccana, E. tereticornis, E.crebra,
Bursaria spinosa, and Themeda australis.
In the Illawarra region, P. spicata is found in open
woodland and also in coastal grassland communities
with emergent shrubs. Dominant species within the
woodland habitat include Eucalyptus tereticornis, E.
eugenioides, Themeda australis, and Lomandra
longifolia. In the coastal Illawarra it occurs commonly in
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 51
Scientific name Common name EPBC
Act
TSC
Act
Most
Recent
Record
Likelihood
of
occurrence
Rationale for
likelihood
Habitat description
Coast Banksia open woodland with a more well
developed shrub and grass understorey.
Pimelea spicata flowers sporadically throughout the
year, with flowering likely to depend upon climatic
conditions, particularly rainfall. Flowering times
recorded for P. spicata vary. Rye (1990) noted flowering
period as May - January; Benson and McDougall (2001)
noted peak flowering period as March/ April.
Pterostylis
saxicola
Sydney Plains
Greenhood
EN E1 # Negligible None previously
recorded within 5 km
of the study area and
the modified nature
does not provide
potential habitat.
Restricted to western Sydney between Freemans
Reach in the north and Picton in the south
(Hawkesbury/Nepean and Sydney Metropolitan
Catchment).
Most commonly found growing in small pockets of
shallow soil in depressions on sandstone rock shelves
above cliff lines. The vegetation communities above
the shelves where Pterostylis saxicola occurs are
sclerophyll forest or woodland on shale/sandstone
transition soils or shale soils.
All species of Pterostylis are deciduous and die back to
fleshy, rounded underground tuberoids.
The time of emergence and withering has not been
recorded for this species, however flowering occurs
from October to December and may vary due to
climatic conditions. The above ground parts of the
plant whither and die following seed dispersal and the
plant persists as a tuberoid until the next year.
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 52
Scientific name Common name EPBC
Act
TSC
Act
Most
Recent
Record
Likelihood
of
occurrence
Rationale for
likelihood
Habitat description
Streblus
pendulinus
Whalebone Tree EN # Negligible None previously
recorded within 5 km
of the study area and
the modified nature
does not provide
potential habitat.
The species is found in warmer rainforests, chiefly
along watercourses. The altitudinal range is from near
sea level to 800 m above sea level. The species grows
in well developed rainforest, gallery forest and drier,
more seasonal rainforest).
Syzygium
paniculatum
Magenta Lilly
Pilly
VU E1 # Negligible No suitable rainforest
habitat present within
the study area.
Subtropical and littoral rainforest on sandy soils or
stabilised dunes near the sea. Found only in NSW, in a
narrow, linear coastal strip from Bulahdelah to Conjola
State Forest. On the south coast the Magenta Lilly Pilly
occurs on grey soils over sandstone, restricted mainly
to remnant stands of littoral (coastal) rainforest. On the
central coast Magenta Lilly Pilly occurs on gravels,
sands, silts and clays in riverside gallery rainforests and
remnant littoral rainforest communities. The species
occurs in the following Catchment Authority Regions -
Hunter/Central Rivers, Hawkesbury/Nepean, Sydney
Metropolitan, and Southern Rivers.
Tetratheca
juncea
Black-eyed
Susan
VU V 1913 Low No suitable habitat
within the study area.
Tetratheca juncea occurs in the Hunter/Central Rivers
catchment. Specifically to the northern portion of the
Sydney Basin bioregion and the southern portion of
the North Coast bioregion in the local government
areas of Wyong, Lake Macquarie, Newcastle, Port
Stephens, Great Lakes and Cessnock.
It generally prefers well-drained sites and occurs on
ridges, although it has also been found on upper
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 53
Scientific name Common name EPBC
Act
TSC
Act
Most
Recent
Record
Likelihood
of
occurrence
Rationale for
likelihood
Habitat description
slopes, mid-slopes and occasionally in gullies.
Vegetation types associated with Tetratheca juncea
include sandy or swampy heath, and dry sclerophyll
forests. Most populations occur in woodland on poor
nutrient sandy soils with good drainage and low
moisture levels.
The majority of populations occur on low nutrient soils
associated with the Awaba Soil Landscape.
Typically found in dense understorey of grasses and
canopy species including Angophora costata, Corymbia
gummifera, Eucalyptus haemastoma and E. capitellata.
Flowers mostly July to Dec.
Thelymitra sp.
Kangaloon
(D.L.Jones
18108)
CE # Negligible None previously
recorded within 5 km
of the study area and
the modified nature
does not provide
potential habitat.
The Kangaloon Sun-orchid is a terrestrial orchid, with a
flower stem growing to 56 cm high. The narrow fleshy
leaf grows to 35 cm long, and has a purplish base. The
plant produces two to 15 dark blue flowers with darker
longitudinal veins. The Kangaloon Sun-orchid is
endemic to New South Wales, and is known from three
locations near Robertson in the Southern Highlands.
Thesium
australe
Austral Toadflax VU V # Negligible No suitable habitat
present.
Found in very small to large populations scattered
across eastern NSW, along the coast, and from the
Northern to Southern Tablelands. Thesium australe is
a root parasite that takes water and some nutrient
from other plants, especially Kangaroo Grass. It is often
found in damp sites in association with Themeda
australe, but also found on other grass species at
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 54
Scientific name Common name EPBC
Act
TSC
Act
Most
Recent
Record
Likelihood
of
occurrence
Rationale for
likelihood
Habitat description
inland sites. Occurs on clay soils in grassy woodlands
or coastal headlands.
Wilsonia
backhousei
Narrow-leafed
Wilsonia
V 2007 Negligible Predominantly
associated with
saltmarsh
communities, none of
which were present
within the study area.
In NSW Wilsonia backhousei is found in the Southern
Rivers and Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Area,
specifically on the coast between Mimosa Rocks
National Park and Wamberal north of Sydney (Nelson's
Lake, Potato Point, Sussex Inlet, Wowly Gully,
Parramatt
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 55
Appendix 2: Fauna
Below is a list of fauna species recorded from the study area during the present assessment and a list of
significant fauna species recorded or predicted to occur within five kilometres of the study area.
Notes to tables:
EPBC Act:
EX - Extinct
CR - Critically Endangered
EN - Endangered
VU - Vulnerable
CD - Conservation dependent
TSC Act:
C1 – critically endangered
E1 – endangered (Part 1, Schedule 1)
E2 – endangered (Part 2, Schedule 1)
E4 – presumed extinct (Part 4, Schedule 1)
V1 – vulnerable (Part 1, Schedule 2)
* - introduced species
Fauna species in these tables are listed in alphabetical order within their taxonomic group.
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 56
A2.1 Fauna species recorded from the study area
Table 14: Vertebrate fauna recorded from the study area (present assessment)
Status Scientific name Common name
Birds
Cracticus tibicen Australian magpie
Cracticus torquatus Grey butcherbird
Manorina melanocephala Noisy miner
Ocyphaps lophotes Crested pigeon
Strepera graculina Pied currawong
Trichoglossus haematodus Rainbow lorikeet
Reptiles
Lampropholis delicata Delicate garden skink
Frogs
Limnodynastes peronii Striped marsh frog
Note: Details on the location of species recorded during the aquatic surveys are provided in A4.2 below.
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 57
A4.2 Significant fauna species
The following table includes a list of the significant fauna species that have potential to occur within the study area. The list of species is sourced from the
OEH Bionet Atlas of NSW Wildlife (NSW OEH, 2014, and the Protected Matters Search Tool (DotE; accessed on 6/01/2014).
The most recent record relates to:
# species predicted to occur by the DSEWPaC database (not recorded on other databases)
## species predicted to occur based on natural distributional range and suitable habitat despite lack of records in the databases searched
Year recorded on databases listed above
Table 15: Significant fauna species recorded, or predicted to occur, within 5 km of the study area.
Scientific name Common name EPBC
Act
TSC Most
recent
record
Likelihoo
d of
impacts
Rationale for likelihood Habitat description
Anthochaera
phrygia
Regent
Honeyeater
EN/M E4A 1994 Low This species may forage
within suitable foraging
resources within the study
area on rare occasions;
however the study area is
highly urbanised, and
there is a general lack of
suitable habitat in the
locality (i.e. key eucalypt
species).
A semi-nomadic species occurring in temperate
eucalypt woodlands and open forests. Most
records are from box-ironbark eucalypt forest
associations and wet lowland coastal forests.
Key eucalypt species include Mugga Ironbark,
Yellow Box, Blakely's Red Gum, White Box and
Swamp Mahogany. Also utilises: E. microcarpa, E.
punctata, E. polyanthemos, E. mollucana, Corymbia
robusta, E. crebra, E. caleyi, C. maculata, E.
mckieana, E. macrorhyncha, E. laevopinea and
Angophora floribunda. Nectar and fruit from the
mistletoes A. miquelii, A. pendula, A. cambagei are
also eaten during the breeding season. Regent
Honeyeaters usually nest in horizontal branches
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 58
Scientific name Common name EPBC
Act
TSC Most
recent
record
Likelihoo
d of
impacts
Rationale for likelihood Habitat description
or forks in tall mature eucalypts and sheoaks.
Also nest in mistletoe haustoria. An open cup-
shaped nest is constructed of bark, grass, twigs
and wool by the female.
Callocephalon
fimbriatum
Gang-gang
Cockatoo
V, E2 1991 Low This species may forage
within suitable foraging
resources within the study
area on rare occasions;
however the study area is
highly urbanised, lacks
suitable breeding
resources (large hollows)
and there is a general lack
of suitable habitat in the
locality (i.e. forested
habitat).
In summer, occupies tall montane forests and
woodlands, particularly in heavily timbered and
mature wet sclerophyll forests. Also occur in
subalpine Snow Gum woodland and occasionally
in temperate or regenerating forest. In winter,
occurs at lower altitudes in drier, more open
eucalypt forests and woodlands, particularly in
box-ironbark assemblages, or in dry forest in
coastal areas. It requires tree hollows in which to
breed.
Calyptorhynchus
lathami
Glossy Black-
Cockatoo
V, E2 1990 Low The study area is
considered to provide
limited foraging habitat
for this species. However,
the proposed works will
not remove any of these
trees from the study area.
As such, the potential
impacts to this species are
Inhabits forest with low nutrients,
characteristically with key Allocasuarina species.
Tends to prefer drier forest types. Often
confined to remnant patches in hills and gullies.
Breed in hollows stumps or limbs, either living or
dead.
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 59
Scientific name Common name EPBC
Act
TSC Most
recent
record
Likelihoo
d of
impacts
Rationale for likelihood Habitat description
considered to be low.
Chalinolobus
dyweri
Large-eared
Pied Bat
VU V # Low This species may forage
within the study area on
occasion; however the
study area does not
support key habitat
components (i.e. extensive
cliffs and caves).
Found mainly in areas with extensive cliffs and
caves, from Rockhampton in Queensland south
to Bungonia in the NSW Southern Highlands. It is
generally rare with a very patchy distribution in
NSW. Roosts in caves (near their entrances),
crevices in cliffs, old mine workings and in the
disused, bottle-shaped mud nests of the Fairy
Martin (Petrochelidon ariel), frequenting low to
mid-elevation dry open forest and woodland
close to these features
Dasyornis
brachypterus
Eastern
bristlebird
EN E1 # Negligible This species is considered
unlikely to utilize habitat in
the study area due to the
highly disturbed nature of
the site and lack of
suitable habitat resources
(i.e. dense heath
vegetation).
They are shy and cryptic and mostly occur in
dense, coastal vegetation. Although secretive,
they are occasionally seen scampering across
open clearings and are easily located by their
loud, melodic song and a harsh, sharp alarm-call.
Habitat is characterised by dense, low vegetation
including heath and open woodland with a
heathy understorey; in northern NSW occurs in
open forest with tussocky grass understorey; all
of these vegetation types are fire prone.
Dasyurus
maculatus
maculatus (SE
Spotted-tail
Quoll
EN V # Low This species is considered
unlikely to utilize habitat in
the study area due to the
The range of the Spotted-tailed Quoll has
contracted considerably since European
settlement. It is now found on the east coast of
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 60
Scientific name Common name EPBC
Act
TSC Most
recent
record
Likelihoo
d of
impacts
Rationale for likelihood Habitat description
mainland
population)
highly disturbed and
urbanised nature of the
site and lack of suitable
habitat resources (ie
availability of den sites).
NSW, Tasmania, eastern Victoria and north-
eastern Queensland. Recorded across a range of
habitat types, including rainforest, open forest,
woodland, coastal heath and inland riparian
forest, from the sub-alpine zone to the coastline.
Individual animals use hollow-bearing trees,
fallen logs, small caves, rock crevices, boulder
fields and rocky-cliff faces as den sites. Mostly
nocturnal, although will hunt during the day;
spends most of the time on the ground,
although also an excellent climber and may raid
possum and glider dens and prey on roosting
birds.
Glossopsitta
pusilla
Little Lorikeet V 2012 Low The study area supports a
small amount of foraging
habitat; however there is a
lack of suitable habitat in
the locality (i.e. feed tree
species).
Distributed in forests and woodlands from the
coast to the western slopes of the Great Dividing
Range in NSW, extending westwards to the
vicinity of Albury, Parkes, Dubbo and Narrabri.
Mostly occur in dry, open eucalypt forests and
woodlands. They feed primarily on nectar and
pollen in the tree canopy. Nest hollows are
located at heights of between 2 m and 15 m,
mostly in living, smooth-barked eucalypts. Most
breeding records come from the western slopes.
Heleioporus
australiacus
Giant Burrowing
Frog
VU V # Negligible This species is considered
unlikely to utilize habitat in
The Giant Burrowing Frog is distributed in south
eastern NSW and Victoria, and appears to exist
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 61
Scientific name Common name EPBC
Act
TSC Most
recent
record
Likelihoo
d of
impacts
Rationale for likelihood Habitat description
the study area due to the
highly disturbed and
urbanised nature of the
site and lack of suitable
habitat resources (i.e.
close proximity of
breeding habitat).
as two distinct populations: a northern
population largely confined to the sandstone
geology of the Sydney Basin and extending as
far south as Ulladulla, and a southern population
occurring from north of Narooma through to
Walhalla, Victoria. Found in heath, woodland and
open dry sclerophyll forest on a variety of soil
types except those that are clay based. Spends
more than 95% of its time in non-breeding
habitat in areas up to 300 m from breeding sites
Isoodon
obesulus
obesulus
Southern Brown
Bandicoot
EN E1 # Negligible This species is considered
unlikely to utilize habitat in
the study area due to the
highly disturbed and
urbanised nature of the
site and lack of suitable
habitat (i.e. heathy
understorey), and habitat
resources (i.e. suitable
fungi).
The Southern Brown Bandicoot has a patchy
distribution. It is found in south-eastern NSW,
and are generally only found in heath or open
forest with a heathy understorey on sandy or
friable soils. They feed on a variety of ground-
dwelling invertebrates and the fruit-bodies of
hypogeous (underground-fruiting) fungi. Their
searches for food often create distinctive conical
holes in the soil.
Lathamus
discolor
Swift Parrot EN E1 2004 Low Although no breeding
habitat occurs for this
species in NSW, this
species is potential for this
species to utilize foraging
The Swift Parrot occurs in woodlands and forests
of NSW from May to August, where it feeds on
eucalypt nectar, pollen and associated insects.
The Swift Parrot is dependent on flowering
resources across a wide range of habitats in its
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 62
Scientific name Common name EPBC
Act
TSC Most
recent
record
Likelihoo
d of
impacts
Rationale for likelihood Habitat description
resources in the study
area (i.e. street planted
Spotted gum) on rare
occasions. Furthermore,
as the proposed works will
not remove these trees
from the study area, the
potential impacts to this
species are considered to
be low.
wintering grounds in NSW. Favoured feed trees
include winter flowering species such as Swamp
Mahogany Eucalyptus robusta, Spotted Gum
Corymbia maculata, Red Bloodwood C.
gummifera, Mugga Ironbark E. sideroxylon, and
White Box E. albens. Commonly used lerp
infested trees include Grey Box E. microcarpa,
Grey Box E. moluccana and Blackbutt E. pilularis.
This species is migratory, breeding in Tasmania
and also nomadic, moving about in response to
changing food availability.
LItoria aurea Green and
Golden Bell Frog
VU E1 # Negligible The study area does not
provide suitable habitat
for this species (i.e.
waterbodies with fringing
aquatic vegetation).
Since 1990 there have been approximately 50
recorded locations in NSW, most of which are
small, coastal, or near coastal populations. These
locations occur over the species’ former range,
however they are widely separated and isolated.
Large populations in NSW are located around
the metropolitan areas of Sydney, Shoalhaven
and mid north coast (one an island population).
There is only one known population on the NSW
Southern Tablelands. Inhabits marshes, dams
and stream-sides, particularly those containing
bullrushes (Typha spp.) or spikerushes
(Eleocharis spp.). Optimum habitat includes
water-bodies that are unshaded, free of
predatory fish such as Plague Minnow
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 63
Scientific name Common name EPBC
Act
TSC Most
recent
record
Likelihoo
d of
impacts
Rationale for likelihood Habitat description
(Gambusia holbrooki), have a grassy area nearby
and diurnal sheltering sites available.
LItoria
littlejohni
Littlejohn's Tree
Frog
VU V # Negligible The study area is
considered unlikely to
provide suitable habitat
for this species, due to the
low altitude of the site,
lack of suitable breeding
habitat - aquatic
waterbodies, and non-
breeding habitat (i.e.
heath-based forests) in
the vicinity.
The majority of records are from within the
Sydney Basin Bioregion with only scattered
records south to the Victorian border and this
species has not been recorded in southern NSW
within the last decade. Records are isolated and
tend to be at high altitude. This species breeds in
the upper reaches of permanent streams and in
perched swamps. Non-breeding habitat is heath
based forests and woodlands where it shelters
under leaf litter and low vegetation, and hunts
for invertebrate prey either in shrubs or on the
ground.
LItoria
raniformis
Growling Grass
Frog
VU E1 # Negligible The study area is
considered unlikely to
provide suitable habitat
for this species, due to the
lack of suitable aquatic
waterbodies (i.e. swamps,
billabongs, floodplains or
inundated artificial
waterbodies) in the
vicinity.
In NSW the species was once distributed along
the Murray and Murrumbidgee Rivers and their
tributaries, the southern slopes of the Monaro
district and the central southern tablelands as
far north as Tarana, near Bathurst. Currently, the
species is known to exist only in isolated
populations in the Coleambally Irrigation Area,
the Lowbidgee floodplain and around Lake
Victoria. Usually found in or around permanent
or ephemeral Black Box/Lignum/Nitre
Goosefoot swamps, Lignum/Typha swamps and
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 64
Scientific name Common name EPBC
Act
TSC Most
recent
record
Likelihoo
d of
impacts
Rationale for likelihood Habitat description
River Red Gum swamps or billabongs along
floodplains and river valleys. They are also found
in irrigated rice crops, particularly where there is
no available natural habitat.
Lophochroa
leadbeateri
Major Mitchell's
Cockatoo
V 1998 Low The study area is outside
of the normal range for
this species. In addition,
the study area does not
provide suitable habitat
(i.e. mallee-casuarina
woodland assemblages).
Found mainly in semi-arid and arid regions, in
dry woodlands, particularly mallee - casuarina
assemblages. They breed in the hollows of large
trees, often near watercourse.
Lophoictinia
isura
Square-tailed
Kite
V 2013 Low This species is considered
unlikely to utilize habitat in
the study area, due to the
limited prey abdundance
(i.e. passerine birds) and
highly urbanised nature of
the locality.
Typically inhabits coastal forested and wooded
lands of tropical and temperate Australia. In
NSW it is often associated with ridge and gully
forests dominated by Eucalyptus longifolia,
Corymbia maculata, E. elata, or E. smithii.
Individuals appear to occupy large hunting
ranges of more than 100 km2. They require
large living trees for breeding, particularly near
water with surrounding woodland /forest close
by for foraging habitat. Nest sites are generally
located along or near watercourses, in a tree
fork or on large horizontal limbs.
Miniopterus Eastern V 2012 Low This species may forage Occurs from Victoria to Queensland, on both
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 65
Scientific name Common name EPBC
Act
TSC Most
recent
record
Likelihoo
d of
impacts
Rationale for likelihood Habitat description
schreibersii
oceanensis
Bentwing-bat within the study area on
occasion; however, the
study area does not
support key habitat
components (i.e. extensive
cliffs and caves).
sides of the Great Dividing Range. Forms large
maternity roosts (up to 100,000 individuals) in
caves and mines in spring and summer.
Individuals may fly several hundred km to their
wintering sites, where they roost in caves,
culverts, buildings, and bridges. They occur in a
broad range of habitats including rainforest, wet
and dry sclerophyll forest, paperbark forest and
open grasslands. Has a fast, direct flight and
forages for flying insects (particularly moths)
above the tree canopy and along waterways.
Mixophyes
balbus
Stuttering Frog VU E1 # Negligible This species is considered
unlikely to utilize habitat in
the study area, due to the
lack of suitable habitat in
the locality (i.e. rainforest
and wet forest).
Stuttering Frogs occur along the east coast of
Australia from southern Queensland to north-
eastern Victoria. Considered to have
disappeared from Victoria and to have
undergone considerable range contraction in
NSW, particularly in south-east NSW. Found in
rainforest and wet, tall open forest in the
foothills and escarpment on the eastern side of
the Great Dividing Range. Outside the breeding
season adults live in deep leaf litter and thick
understorey vegetation on the forest floor.
Monarcha
melanopsis
Black-faced
Monarch
M 2001 Low This species is considered
unlikely to utilize habitat in
the study area, due to the
A migratory species found during the breeding
season in damp gullies in temperate rainforests.
Disperses after breeding into more open
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 66
Scientific name Common name EPBC
Act
TSC Most
recent
record
Likelihoo
d of
impacts
Rationale for likelihood Habitat description
lack of suitable habitat in
the locality (ie forested
and wooded
assemblages).
woodland.
Mormopterus
norfolkensis
Eastern Freetail-
bat
- V 2008 Medium The study area provides
potential foraging and
roosting habitat resources
for this species. Suitable
microbat roosting hollows
were observed in a
number of trees
surrounding the carpark,
including two Smooth-
barked Apple and one
Spotted Gum. The
removal of these trees has
the potential to impact
breeding resources for
this species in the locality,
if the species is using
these hollows.
Distribution extends east of the Great Dividing
Range from southern Queensland to south of
Sydney. Most records are from dry eucalypt
forests and woodland. Individuals tend to forage
in natural and artificial openings in forests,
although it has also been caught foraging low
over a rocky river within rainforest and wet
sclerophyll forest habitats. The species generally
roosts in hollow spouts of large mature
eucalypts (including paddock trees), although
individuals have been recorded roosting in the
roof of a hut, in wall cavities, and under metal
caps of telegraph poles. Foraging generally
occurs within a few km of roosting sites.
Myiagra
cyanoleuca
Satin Flycatcher M - 1994 Low The study area is
considered unlikely to
provide suitable habitat
for this species, due to the
Migratory species that occurs in coastal forests,
woodlands and scrubs during migration. Breeds
in heavily vegetated gullies.
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 67
Scientific name Common name EPBC
Act
TSC Most
recent
record
Likelihoo
d of
impacts
Rationale for likelihood Habitat description
urbanised nature of the
locality and lack of
suitable habitat resources
for this species (ie intact
native vegetation).
Neophema
chrysogaster
Orange-bellied
Parrot
CR C1 # Negligible The study area is
considered unlikely to
provide suitable habitat
for this species, due to the
urbanised nature of the
locality and lack of
suitable habitat resources
for this species (i.e.
sheltered coastal marine
habitats).
The Orange-bellied Parrot breeds in the south-
west of Tasmania and migrates in autumn to
spend the winter on the mainland coast of
south-eastern South Australia and southern
Victoria. There are occasional reports from NSW,
and typical winter habitat is saltmarsh and
strandline/foredune vegetation communities
either on coastlines or coastal lagoons. The
species also inhabits small islands and
peninsulas and occasionally saltworks and golf
courses. Birds forage in low samphire herbland
or taller coastal shrubland.
Ninox strenua Powerful Owl V 2013 Low This species is considered
to have some potential to
forage in the study area
on occassion due to the
presence of habitat for
preferred prey species.
However, due to the
urbanised nature of the
The Powerful Owl occupies wet and dry eucalypt
forests and rainforests. It may inhabit both un-
logged and lightly logged forests as well as
undisturbed forests where it usually roosts on
the limbs of dense trees in gully areas. Large
mature trees with hollows at least 0.5 m deep
are required for nesting. Tree hollows are
particularly important for the Powerful Owl
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 68
Scientific name Common name EPBC
Act
TSC Most
recent
record
Likelihoo
d of
impacts
Rationale for likelihood Habitat description
study area and availability
of better quality habitat in
the surrounding area (i.e.
Myles Dunphy Bushland
Reserve), it is considered
unlikely.
because a large proportion of the diet is made
up of hollow-dependent arboreal marsupials.
Nest trees for this species are usually emergent
with a diameter at breast height of at least 100
cm. It has a large home range of between 450
and 1450 ha.
Pachycephala
olivacea
Olive Whistler V Low The study area is
considered unlikely to
provide suitable habitat
for this species, due to the
urbanised nature of the
locality and lack of
suitable habitat resources
for this species (i.e. intact
native vegetation).
Found in a range of habitats including alpine
thickets, wetter rainforest/woodlands, riparian
vegetation and heaths.
Pandion
cristatus
Osprey M V 2013 Low This species may overfly
the study area on
occasion. However, due to
the urbanised nature of
the study area and lack of
suitable foraging or
breeding habitat, it is
considered unlikely.
Found in coastal waters, inlets, estuaries and
offshore islands. Occasionally found 100 km
inland along larger rivers. It is water-dependent,
hunting for fish in clear, open water. The Osprey
occurs in terrestrial wetlands, coastal lands and
offshore islands. It is a predominantly coastal
species, generally using marine cliffs as nesting
and roosting sites. Nests can also be made high
up in dead trees or in dead crowns of live trees,
usually within one km of the sea.
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 69
Scientific name Common name EPBC
Act
TSC Most
recent
record
Likelihoo
d of
impacts
Rationale for likelihood Habitat description
Petrogale
penicillata
Brush-tailed
Rock-wallaby
VU E1 # Negligible The study area is
considered unlikely to
provide suitable habitat
for this species, due to the
urbanised nature of the
locality, and lack of
suitable habitat and
habitat resources (i.e.
rocky escarpments).
In NSW they occur from the Queensland border
in the north to the Shoalhaven in the south, with
the population in the Warrumbungle Ranges
being the western limit. Occupy rocky
escarpments, outcrops and cliffs with a
preference for complex structures with fissures,
caves and ledges, often facing north. Browse on
vegetation in and adjacent to rocky areas eating
grasses and forbs as well as the foliage and fruits
of shrubs and trees.
Phascolarctos
cinereus
Koala VU V, E2 1999 Low The study area is
considered unlikely to
provide suitable habitat
for this species, due to the
urbanised nature of the
locality, lack of
connectivity and lack of
suitable habitat resources
for this species (i.e.
preferred feed trees).
Pittwater LGA and Hawks nest: In NSW the Koala
mainly occurs on the central and north coasts
with some populations in the western region.
Koalas feed almost exclusively on eucalypt
foliage, and their preferences vary regionally.
Primary feed trees include Eucalyptus robusta, E.
tereticornis, E. punctata, E. haemostoma and E.
signata. They are solitary with varying home
ranges. In high quality habitat home ranges may
be 1-2 ha and overlap, while in semi-arid country
they are usually discrete and around 100 ha.
Plegadis
falcinellus
Glossy Ibis M Negligible The study area does not
support suitable habitat
resources for this species
in the study area (i.e.
Terrestrial wetlands, and occasionally wet
grasslands and sheltered marine habitats.
Forage in shallow water over soft substrate or on
grassy or muddy verges of wetlands, preferring
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 70
Scientific name Common name EPBC
Act
TSC Most
recent
record
Likelihoo
d of
impacts
Rationale for likelihood Habitat description
wetlands). those providing variety of water depths; avoid
dry ground.
Potorous
tridactylus
tridactylus
Long-nosed
Potoroo (SE
mainland)
VU # Negligible This species is considered
unlikely to utilize habitat in
the study area due to the
highly disturbed and
urbanised nature of the
site and lack of suitable
habitat (i.e. dense
understorey, soil type),
and habitat resources (i.e.
suitable fungi).
In NSW it is generally restricted to coastal heaths
and forests east of the Great Dividing Range,
with an annual rainfall exceeding 760 mm.
Inhabits coastal heaths and dry and wet
sclerophyll forests. Dense understorey with
occasional open areas is an essential part of
habitat, and may consist of grass-trees, sedges,
ferns or heath, or of low shrubs of tea-trees or
melaleucas. A sandy loam soil is also a common
feature. The fruit-bodies of hypogeous
(underground-fruiting) fungi are a large
component of the diet of the Long-nosed
Potoroo. They also eat roots, tubers, insects and
their larvae and other soft-bodied animals in the
soil.
Pseudomys
novaehollandiae
New Holland
Mouse
VU - # Negligible This species is considered
unlikely to utilize habitat in
the study area due to the
highly disturbed and
urbanised nature of the
site and lack of suitable
habitat (ie heathland
understorey, vegetated
The New Holland Mouse has a fragmented
distribution across Tasmania, Victoria, New
South Wales and Queensland. Known to inhabit
open heathlands, woodlands and forests with a
heathland understorey and vegetated sand
dunes. It is a social animal, living predominantly
in burrows shared with other individuals.
Distribution is patchy in time and space, with
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 71
Scientific name Common name EPBC
Act
TSC Most
recent
record
Likelihoo
d of
impacts
Rationale for likelihood Habitat description
sand dunes), and habitat
requirements (ie
association with fire).
peaks in abundance during early to mid stages
of vegetation succession typically induced by fire
Pseudophryne
australis
Red-crowned
Toadlet
- V 2005 Low The study area is
considered unlikely to
provide suitable habitat
for this species, due to the
urbanised nature of the
locality and lack of
suitable habitat resources
for this species (i.e.
shallow, ephemeral
drainage lines with
abundant leaf litter).
Occurs on wetter ridge tops and upper slopes of
sandstone formations on which the
predominant vegetation is dry open forests and
heaths. This species typically breeds within small
ephemeral creeks characterised by a series of
shallow pools that feed into larger semi-
perennial streams. Breeds all year round.
Pteropus
poliocephalus
Grey-headed
Flying-fox
VU V 2012 Low This species is considered
to have some potential to
forage within the study
area on occasion when
feed trees are flowering.
Myles Dunphy Reserve
supports a known
population of this species.
However, due to the
availability of better
quality habitat in the
Occurs along the NSW coast, extending further
inland in the north. This species is a canopy-
feeding frugivore and nectarivore of rainforests,
open forests, woodlands, melaleuca swamps
and banksia woodlands. Roosts in large colonies
(camps), commonly in dense riparian vegetation.
Bats commute daily to foraging areas, usually
within 15 km of the day roost although some
individuals may travel up to 70 km.
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 72
Scientific name Common name EPBC
Act
TSC Most
recent
record
Likelihoo
d of
impacts
Rationale for likelihood Habitat description
surrounding area (i.e.
Myles Dunphy Bushland
Reserve), the removal of a
limited number of suitable
feed trees is unlikely to
significantly impact on this
species.
Ptilinopus
superbus
Superb Fruit-
Dove
V 1996 Negligible The study area is
considered unlikely to
provide suitable habitat
for this species, due to the
urbanised nature of the
locality and general lack of
suitable habitat for this
species in the study area
(i.e. rainforests and closed
forests).
The Superb Fruit Dove’s NSW distribution ranges
from northern NSW to as far south as Moruya. It
is found in rainforests, closed forests (including
mesophyll vine forests) and sometimes in
eucalypt and acacia woodlands where there are
fruit-bearing trees. It forages in the canopy of
fruiting trees such as figs and palms. Nests are
constructed high in the canopy throughout
September to January.
Rhipidura
rufifrons
Rufous Fantail M 2003 Low This species is considered
unlikely to utilize habitat in
the study area, due to the
lack of suitable habitat
resources in the locality
(i.e. dense undergrowth).
Migratory species that prefers dense, moist
undergrowth of tropical rainforests and scrubs.
During migration it can stray into gardens and
more open areas.
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 73
Table 16: Additional threatened marine and shorebird species previously recorded within 5 km of the study area
Scientific name Common name EPBC Act TSC Act
Botaurus poiciloptilus Australasian Bittern EN E1
Calidris ferruginea Curlew Sandpiper M E1
Charadrius mongolus Lesser Sand-plover M V
Diomedea anitpodensis Antipodean Albatross V V
Diomedea dabbanena Tristan Albatross E -
Diomedea epomophora (sensu stricto) Southern Royal Albatross V -
Diomedea exulans (sensu lato) Wandering Albatross EN E1
Diomedea gibsoni Gibson's Albatross V V
Diomedea sanfordi Northern Royal Albatross E -
Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus Black-necked stork - E1
Haematopus longirostris Pied Oystercatcher - E1
Macronectes giganteus Southern Giant-Petrel EN E1
Macronectes halli Northern Giant-Petrel V V
Rostratula benghalensis (sensu lato) Painted Snipe EN E1
Thalassarche bulleri Buller's Albatross V -
Thalassarche cauta (sensu stricto) Shy Albatross V V
Thalassarche eremita Chatham Albatross E -
Thalassarche impavida Campbell Albatross V -
Thalassarche melanophris Black-browed Albatross V V
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 74
Scientific name Common name EPBC Act TSC Act
Thalassarche salvini Salvin's Albatross V -
Thalassarche steadi White-capped Albatross V -
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 75
A2.3 Migratory species (EPBC Act listed)
Includes records from the following sources:
Atlas of NSW Wildlife (refer to Section 2.1)
Department of Environment database (accessed on 6/01/2014)
BirdLife Australia data search
Current survey
Bold denotes species recorded in the study area during the current assessment.
Table 17: Migratory avifauna species recorded or predicted to occur within 5 km of the study area.
Scientific Name Common Name
Actitis hypoleucos Common Sandpiper
Apus pacificus Fork-tailed Swift
Ardea alba Great White Egret
Ardea ibis Cattle Egret
Ardea modesta Eastern Great Egret
Calidris acuminata Sharp-tailed Sandpiper
Calidris ruficollis Red-necked Stint
Gallinago hardwickii Latham's Snipe
Haliaeetus leucogaster White-bellied Sea-eagle
Hirundapus caudacutus White-throated Needletail
Hydroprogne caspia Caspian Tern
Limosa lapponica Bar-tailed Godwit
Merops ornatus Rainbow Bee-eater
Monarcha melanopsis Black-faced Monarch
Monarcha trivirgatus Spectacled Monarch
Myiagra cyanoleuca Satin Flycatcher
Numenius madagascariensis Eastern Curlew
Numenius phaeopus Whimbrel
Tringa brevipes Grey-tailed Tattler
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 76
Appendix 3: Tree removal
Table 18: Details of trees to potentially affected
Tree
Number
Scientific name Common name Height
(m)
DBH
(m)
Likelihood of
removal
Hurstville/Kogarah LGA
preservation status
Comments
1 Corymbia maculata Spotted gum 12 0.5 Moderate Protected Retain if possible
2 Corymbia maculata Spotted gum 15 0.5 Moderate Protected Retain if possible
3 Corymbia maculata Spotted gum 15 0.5 Moderate Protected Retain if possible
4 Eucalyptus microcorys Tallowood 12 0.6 High Protected Retain if possible
5 Corymbia maculata Spotted gum 12 0.3 Moderate Protected Retain if possible
6 Corymbia maculata Spotted gum 15 0.6 High Protected Retain if possible
7 Callistemon viminalis Weeping
Bottlebrush
4 0.4 High Protected Low value
8 Angophora costata Sydney Red Gum 12 0.5 High Protected Tree hollow provides fauna
habitat
9 Schinus areira Pepper Tree 8 0.5 High Protected Low value
10 Angophora costata Sydney Red Gum 12 0.9 High Protected Retain if possible
11 Schinus areira Pepper Tree 8 0.6 Low Protected Low value
12 Schinus areira Pepper Tree 8 1 Low Protected Low value
13 Syagrus romanzoffiana Cocos Palm 7 0.4 High Protected Low value
14 Syagrus romanzoffiana Cocos Palm 7 0.4 High Protected Low value
15 Syagrus romanzoffiana Cocos Palm 7 0.4 High Protected Low value
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 77
Tree
Number
Scientific name Common name Height
(m)
DBH
(m)
Likelihood of
removal
Hurstville/Kogarah LGA
preservation status
Comments
16 Syagrus romanzoffiana Cocos Palm 7 0.4 High Protected Low value
17 Schinus areira Pepper Tree 8 0.7 Low Protected Low value
18 Populus nigra Lombardy
Poplar
21 0.9 Moderate Not Protected Low value
19 Glochidion ferdinandi Cheese Tree 5 0.3 Moderate Protected Retain if possible
20 Glochidion ferdinandi Cheese Tree 10 0.8 High Protected Moderate value
21 Glochidion ferdinandi Cheese Tree 8 0.5 High Protected Moderate value
22 Cinnamomum camphora Camphor Laurel 6 0.3 High Protected Low value
23 Glochidion ferdinandi Cheese Tree 10 0.6 High Protected Moderate value
24 Glochidion ferdinandi Cheese Tree 8 0.5 High Protected Moderate value
25 Glochidion ferdinandi Cheese Tree 8 0.3 High Protected Moderate value
26 Cinnamomum camphora Camphor Laurel 12 0.8 High Protected Low value
27 Populus nigra Lombardy
Poplar
21 0.6 Moderate Not Protected Low value
28 Populus nigra Lombardy
Poplar
18 0.6 Moderate Not Protected Low value
29 Eucalyptus microcorys Tallowood 20 0.6 Moderate Protected Retain if possible
30 Eucalyptus microcorys Tallowood 16 0.6 Low Protected Retain if possible
31 Populus nigra Lombardy
Poplar
20 0.3 Moderate Not Protected Low value
32 Syncarpia glomulifera Turpentine 6 0.2 Moderate Protected Juvenile planted tree
© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 78
Tree
Number
Scientific name Common name Height
(m)
DBH
(m)
Likelihood of
removal
Hurstville/Kogarah LGA
preservation status
Comments
33 Syncarpia glomulifera Turpentine 6 0.2 Moderate Protected Juvenile planted tree
34 Syncarpia glomulifera Turpentine 6 0.2 Moderate Protected Juvenile planted tree
35 Syncarpia glomulifera Turpentine 8 0.2 Moderate Protected Juvenile planted tree
36 Syncarpia glomulifera Turpentine 8 0.2 High Protected Juvenile planted tree
37 Syncarpia glomulifera Turpentine 8 0.2 High Protected Juvenile planted tree
38 Syncarpia glomulifera Turpentine 8 0.2 High Protected Juvenile planted tree
39 Syncarpia glomulifera Turpentine 7 0.2 High Protected Juvenile planted tree
40 Syncarpia glomulifera Turpentine 11 0.2 High Protected Juvenile planted tree
41 Syncarpia glomulifera Turpentine 9 0.2 High Protected Juvenile planted tree
42 Syncarpia glomulifera Turpentine 9 0.2 High Protected Juvenile planted tree
43 Syncarpia glomulifera Turpentine 11 0.2 Low Protected Juvenile planted tree
Tree height and DBH adapted from data provided to Biosis (DS&P, 2013).