oatley station accessibility upgrade flora and fauna ... · tsc act the study area is considered...

86
© Biosis September 2012 – Leading ecology and heritage consultants 1 Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna Assessment FINAL REPORT Prepared for Transport for NSW 10 April 2014

Upload: others

Post on 04-Nov-2020

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis September 2012 – Leading ecology and heritage consultants 1

Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade

Flora and Fauna Assessment FINAL REPORT

Prepared for Transport for NSW

10 April 2014

Page 2: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2013 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting www.biosis.com.au i

Biosis Pty Ltd

This report (Flora and Fauna Impact Assessment Report) has been prepared by Biosis Pty Ltd

(Biosis) for Transport for NSW (TfNSW) and may be used and relied on by TfNSW. Preparation of

this Report is a requirement of the Professional Services Contract (PSC) between TfNSW and Biosis

in relation to Oatley Accessibility Upgrade (Project). In accordance with the PSC, this Report may be

used in whole or in part and relied on by TfNSW and subcontractors or sub-consultants of TfNSW

(Third Parties). With the exception of Third Parties, the contents of this Report are not to be used in

whole or in part, by or for the benefit of others without the express written permission of Biosis

Disclaimer:

Biosis Pty Ltd has completed this assessment in accordance with the relevant federal, state and

local legislation and current industry best practice. The company accepts no liability for any

damages or loss incurred as a result of reliance placed upon the report content or for any purpose

other than that for which it was intended.

Biosis offices

AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY

Canberra

Floor 1, Unit 3, 38 Essington Street

Mitchell ACT 2911

Phone: (02) 6241 2333

Fax: (03) 9646 9242

Email: [email protected]

NEW SOUTH WALES

Sydney

Unit 14, 17-27 Power Avenue

Alexandria NSW 2015

Phone: (02) 9690 2777

Fax: (02) 9690 2577

Email: [email protected]

Wollongong

8 Tate Street

Wollongong NSW 2500

Phone: (02) 4229 5222

Fax: (02) 4229 5500

Email: [email protected]

QUEENSLAND

Brisbane

Suite 4 First Floor, 72 Wickham Street

Fortitude Valley QLD 4006

Phone: (07) 3831 7400

Fax: (07) 3831 7411

Email: [email protected]

VICTORIA

Ballarat

506 Macarthur Street

Ballarat VIC 3350

Phone: (03) 5331 7000

Fax: (03) 5331 7033

Email: [email protected]

Melbourne (Head Office)

38 Bertie Street

Port Melbourne VIC 3207

Phone: (03) 9646 9499

Fax: (03) 9646 9242

Email: [email protected]

Wangaratta

16 Templeton Street

Wangaratta VIC 3677

Phone: (03) 5721 9453

Fax: (03) 5721 9454

Email: [email protected]

Document information

Report to: Transport for NSW

Prepared by: Ed Cooper

Alexandra Cave

Biosis project no.: 17612

File name: 17612.Oatley.Station.Upgrade.TFFA.FIN03.20140410.docx

Citation: Biosis (2014). Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and

Fauna Assessment. Report for Transport for NSW. Authors: E Cooper & A

Cave, Biosis Pty Ltd, Sydney Office. Project no. 17612

Document control

Version Internal reviewer Date issued

Draft version 01 Nathan Garvey 29/01/2014

Final version 01 Nathan Garvey 26/02/2014

Final version 02 Nathan Garvey 18/03/2014

Final version 03 Nathan Garvey 10/04/2014

Acknowledgements

Biosis acknowledges the contribution of the following people and

organisations in undertaking this study:

Adam Hooley (Transport for NSW)

Catherine Barlow (Transport for NSW)

Office of Environment and Heritage for access to the Atlas

of NSW Wildlife

The following Biosis staff were involved in this project:

James Shepherd for mapping

Nathan Garvey for quality assurance

Page 3: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting II

Contents

Summary ................................................................................................................................................................ vi

1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1

1.1 Project background ...................................................................................................................................................... 1

1.2 Scope of assessment ................................................................................................................................................... 1

1.3 Location of the study area .......................................................................................................................................... 1

2. Methods ........................................................................................................................................................ 4

2.1 Nomenclature ............................................................................................................................................................... 4

2.2 Literature and database review ................................................................................................................................ 4

2.3 Site investigation ........................................................................................................................................................... 5

2.3.1 Flora assessment .............................................................................................................................................. 5

2.3.2 Fauna assessment ............................................................................................................................................ 5

2.3.3 Permits and Licenses ....................................................................................................................................... 6

2.4 Survey limitations ......................................................................................................................................................... 6

2.5 Legislation and policy .................................................................................................................................................. 6

2.6 Mapping .......................................................................................................................................................................... 6

3. Results ........................................................................................................................................................... 8

3.1 Ecological Results ......................................................................................................................................................... 8

3.2 Site context and connectivity ..................................................................................................................................... 8

3.3 Vegetation and fauna habitat .................................................................................................................................... 8

3.4 Threatened flora, fauna and ecological communities ...................................................................................... 15

3.4.1 Threatened species ....................................................................................................................................... 15

3.4.2 Threatened ecological communities ......................................................................................................... 15

3.5 Noxious weeds ........................................................................................................................................................... 16

4. Potential impacts and recommended mitigation measures ............................................................ 21

4.1 Potential impacts ....................................................................................................................................................... 21

4.1.1 Direct impacts ................................................................................................................................................. 21

4.1.2 Indirect impacts.............................................................................................................................................. 21

4.2 Recommended mitigation measures ................................................................................................................... 24

5. 4. Biodiversity Legislation and Government Policy ............................................................................. 28

5.1 Commonwealth ......................................................................................................................................................... 28

5.1.1 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, 1999 .................................................... 28

5.2 State .............................................................................................................................................................................. 29

5.2.1 Threatened Species Conservation Act, 1995 ........................................................................................... 29

5.2.2 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 ............................................................................. 30

5.2.3 Native Vegetation Act, 2003 ........................................................................................................................ 31

5.2.4 Noxious Weeds Act 1993 ............................................................................................................................. 31

Page 4: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting III

6. Conclusion .................................................................................................................................................. 33

References ............................................................................................................................................................. 34

Appendices ............................................................................................................................................................ 35

Appendix 1: Flora .................................................................................................................................................. 36

Appendix 2: Fauna ................................................................................................................................................ 55

Appendix 3: Tree removal ................................................................................................................................... 76

List of Figures

Figure 1: Location of the study area, Oatley, NSW ............................................................................................. 3

Figure 2: Vegetation Communities and Fauna Habitat Features of the Study Area .................................... 18

Figure 3: Threatened flora within 5 km of the study area ............................................................................... 19

Figure 4: Threatened fauna within 5 km of the study area ............................................................................. 20

Figure 5: Potential Construction Compound Locations ................................................................................... 26

Figure 6: Trees to be removed ............................................................................................................................ 27

List of Tables

Table 1: Database searches completed for the report ...................................................................................... 4

Table 2: Vegetation Community Description – Degraded hinterland sandstone gully forest ...................... 9

Table 3: Vegetation Community Description – Mown Exotic Grasses and ornamental plantings ............. 11

Table 4: Vegetation Community Description – Modified eucalypt woodland ............................................... 12

Table 5: Vegetation Community Description – Exotic closed woodland ....................................................... 14

Table 6: Summary of threatened species likely to occur in proximity to the study area ............................ 15

Table 7: An analysis of vegetation communities mapped in the study area by Tozer (et al. 2010) are

representative of TECs ......................................................................................................................................... 15

Table 8: Noxious weeds recorded within the study area ................................................................................ 17

Table 9: Assessment of the project against the EPBC Act ............................................................................... 28

Table 10: Key threatening processes listed under the TSC Act, likely to be constituted or exacerbated by

the proposed upgrade ......................................................................................................................................... 29

Table 11: Potential for impacts to threatened species listed on the TSC Act ............................................... 31

Table 12: Flora species recorded from the study area. ................................................................................... 37

Table 13: Significant flora species recorded / predicted to occur within 5 km of the study area. ............. 41

Table 14: Vertebrate fauna recorded from the study area (present assessment) ....................................... 56

Table 15: Significant fauna species recorded, or predicted to occur, within 5 km of the study area........ 57

Table 16: Additional threatened marine and shorebird species previously recorded within 5 km of the

study area .............................................................................................................................................................. 73

Table 17: Migratory avifauna species recorded or predicted to occur within 5 km of the study area. .... 75

Table 18: Details of trees to potentially affected .............................................................................................. 76

List of Plates

Plate 1: Sydney Red Gum HBT showing spouts, fissures and associated stags ........................................... 23

Page 5: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting IV

Glossary

AoS Assessment of Significance – formerly the seven part test

CBD Central Business District

cm centimetre/s

CMA Catchment Management Authority

DBH Diameter at Breast Height

DCP Development Control Plan

DPI Department of Primary Industries

DoE Department of the Environment

EEC Endangered Ecological Community

EP&A Act Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979

EPBC Act Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999

FM Act Fisheries Management Act 1994

ha hectares

GIS Geographic Information System

GPS Global Positioning System

HBT Hollow Bearing Tree

km kilometre/s

KTP Key Threatening Process

LEP Local Environment Plan

LGA Local Government Area

m metre/s

mm millimetre/s

NES Matters of National Environmental Significance

Page 6: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting V

NPWS National Parks and Wildlife Services

NSW New South Wales

NV Act Native Vegetation Act 2003

NW Act Noxious Weeds Act, 1993

OEH Office of Environment and Heritage

Proposal/Project Oatley Station accessibility upgrade.

PVP Property Vegetation Plan

REF Review of Environmental Factors

RoTAP Rare or Threatened Australian Plant

SEPP State Environmental Planning Policy

SIC assessment Significant Impact Criteria assessment

SIS Species Impact Statement

study area The broader area within which the subject site is located

subject site The area of direct impact for the proposed works

TEC Threatened Ecological Community

TfNSW Transport for New South Wales

TPZ Tree Protection Zone

TSC Act Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995

Page 7: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting vi

Summary

Biosis Pty Ltd was commissioned by Transport for NSW (TfNSW) to undertake a terrestrial flora and fauna

assessment of Oatley Station, Oatley. TfNSW is currently implementing the Transport Access Programme

which aims to improve the accessibility of existing stations across the network. A Review of Environmental

Factors (REF) is to be submitted to assess potential impacts on the environment, as part of the approval

process under Part 5 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act). This report forms the

terrestrial flora and fauna component of the REF.

Ecological values

Key ecological values identified within the study area include:

0.19 ha of highly constrained Degraded hinterland sandstone gully forest. No removal of this

vegetation community is proposed.

0.06 ha of moderately constrained Modified eucalypt woodland of which removal of 0.04 ha is

proposed.

Three hollow bearing trees (HBT), including two Sydney Red Gums Angophora costata and one

Spotted Gum Corymbia maculata (to be removed) that may provide suitable roosting habitat for the

threatened Eastern Freetail-bat.

Habitat trees that may provide suitable foraging habitat and resources for threatened avifauna

species and flying-foxes.

Five flora species listed as noxious within the Hurstville and Kogarah Local Government Area (LGA).

Government legislation and policy

An assessment of the project against key biodiversity legislation and policy is provided and summarised

below.

Legislation / Policy Relevant ecological

feature on site

Permit / Approval

required

Notes

EPBC Act The study area is

considered unlikely to

provide potential habitat

for any matters listed

under the EPBC Act.

An EPBC referral is not

recommended.

Rationale for the likely

occurrence of threatened

flora, fauna and ecological

communities is addressed

in Appendix 1 and

Appendix 2.

TSC Act The study area is

considered unlikely to

provide potential habitat

for any flora, fauna or

ecological communities

listed under the TSC Act.

The completion of a

Species Impact Statement

is not recommended.

Rationale for the likely

occurrence of threatened

flora, fauna and ecological

communities is addressed

in Appendix 1 and

Appendix 2.

FM Act No watercourses were

located within the study

NA NA

Page 8: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting vii

Legislation / Policy Relevant ecological

feature on site

Permit / Approval

required

Notes

area.

Environmental

Planning &

Assessment Act

No threatened flora

species or Ecological

Communities were

recorded or considered

likely to occur within the

study area.

Potential habitat for one

threatened fauna species,

the Eastern Freetail-bat, is

provided by hollow-bearing

trees.

Significant impacts to

threatened species,

populations or

communities unlikely to

occur.

A SIS is not required.

NA

NW Act Noxious weeds recorded

include:

Boneseed

Lantana

Green Cestrum

Bridal Creeper

Small-leaved Privet

Noxious weeds should be

controlled according to

their control class. The

requirements for each

species is outlined in

Section 3.5.

Note: Guidance provided in this report does not constitute legal advice.

Recommendations

The principal means to reduce impacts on biodiversity values within the study area will be to avoid and

minimise removal of native vegetation and habitat.

Through development of the concept options report and implementation of the recommendations, the

current reference design is relatively sympathetic to the ecological constraints within the study area.

Recommendations to minimise impacts on biodiversity include Tree Protection Zones, implementing hygiene

protocols and appropriately locating construction compounds. These, along with other recommendations,

are further outlined in Section 4.2.

Conclusions

The overall impact of the proposed upgrade of Oatley station to native flora and fauna is considered to be

low. It is unlikely that the proposed works will result in a significant impact to threatened species, populations

or communities and additional approvals are not required.

Page 9: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 1 1

1. Introduction

1.1 Project background

Biosis Pty Ltd was commissioned by Transport for NSW (TfNSW) to undertake a terrestrial flora and

fauna assessment of Oatley Station, Oatley. As a part of the Transport Access Programme, currently

being rolled out across the network, TfNSW is proposing a number of upgrades to the existing

infrastructure of Oatley Station, including an aerial overbridge stairs, lift and entrance forecourt,

extension of commuter carparking and commuter drop-off areas. A Review of Environmental Factors

(REF) is to be submitted as part of the approval process under Part 5 of the Environmental Planning

and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act). This report forms the terrestrial flora and fauna component of

the REF.

A constraints assessment has previously been completed (GHD, 2012) and informed the

development of the current design. It was noted that only a Reference Design is currently available

which may be subject to change; therefore this report covers an area more extensive that the

proposed construction footprint.

1.2 Scope of assessment

The objectives of this investigation are to:

Undertake database searches to determine the potential for NSW or Commonwealth

threatened biota to occur within the study area.

Describe the vascular flora (ferns, conifers, flowering plants) and vertebrate fauna (birds,

mammals, reptiles, frogs, fish).Map native vegetation and other habitat features.

Confirm the extent and condition of any Threatened Ecological Communities (TEC).

Confirm tree species along the western embankment that are proposed for removal.

Confirm tree species along the eastern side of Oatley station that are proposed for removal.

Confirmation of tree species within the commuter carpark that are proposed for removal.

Undertake searching for threatened flora species.

Undertake searching for evidence of occupation by threatened fauna, particularly the

Powerful Owl and Grey-headed Flying-fox.

Review the implications of relevant biodiversity legislation and policy.

Identify potential implications of the proposed development and provide recommendations

to assist with development design.

Recommend any further assessments of the site that may be required.

1.3 Location of the study area

The study area is located in Oatley, approximately 18 kilometres south of the Sydney Central

Business District (CBD), north of the Georges River, and is part of the St George area (Figure 1). The

study area is defined as the area of potential direct impact of the proposed works, and includes

Page 10: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 2 2

proposed infrastructure upgrades to the car park on Oatley Parade, and the construction of a

pedestrian ramp to be accessed from Oatley Parade to Mulga Road (located adjacent to River Road).

It encompasses 1.54 ha of private and public land and adjacent road reserves and is currently zoned

RE1 Public Recreation, SP2 Infrastructure (Railway) and R2 Low Density Residential.

The study area is within the:

Sydney Basin Bioregion

Georges River catchment

Sydney Metro Catchment Management Area (CMA)

Hurstville and Kogarah Local Government Area (LGA) (note: the LGA boundary runs straight

through Oatley Station)

Page 11: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

Mimosa Street

Mulga Road

Acacia Street

Algernon Street

Boundary Road

Ada S

treet

West C

rescent

Myrtle Street

Louis

a Stre

et

Mi M

i Stre

et

Wyong S

treet

West CrescentGle

n Roa

d

Letitia

Street

Frederick Street

Victory Road

Anne

tte St

reet

Renown Avenue

Boorar

a Aven

ue

Wonoona Parade

Godfrey Street

Ro se Aven

ue

Myall

Stree

t

Warat

ah St

reet

Yarran

Road

Llewelly

n Stree

t

Princes StreetSe

aforth

Aven

uePitt Street

George Street

Kitchener Street

Queens Road

Queens Road

Oatle

y Ave

nue

Judd Street

Judd StreetBlanche Str

eet

Herbert Street

Russell Street

MyraPla

ce

A squithStr

eet

Neville Street

Oatle

y Para

de

Hurstville Road

Letitia

Stree

t

Grove Avenue

Hurstville Road

Gung

ah Ba

y Roa

d

Woron

ora Pa

rade

Rosa

Street

Hurstvil leR oad

Hillcrest Avenue

Illaw

arraRailway

GeorgesRiver

Dairy Creek

Georges River

RenownCreek

CONNELLS BAYNEVERFAILBAY

GUNGAH BAY

OATLEY BAY

GEORGESRIVER

GEORGESRIVER

Parkes

Canberra

SydneyWollongong

Albury

Newcastle

Acknowledgement: Topo (c) NSW Land and Planning Information (2011); Overivew (c) State of NSW (c.2003)

Matter: 17612Date: 24 February 2014,Checked by: NMG, Drawn by: JMS, Last edited by: jshepherdLocation:P:\17600s\17612\Mapping\

LegendStudy AreaSubject site

Scale 1:10,000 @ A4, GDA 1994 MGA Zone 55

0 100 200 300 400

Metres ±Biosis Pty LtdBallarat, Brisbane, Canberra, Melbourne, Sydney, Wangaratta & Wollongong

Figure 1: Location of the Study Area - Oatley, NewSouth Wales

Page 12: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 4 4

2. Methods

2.1 Nomenclature

The flora taxonomy (classification) used in this report follows the most recent Flora of NSW (Harden,

2002). Where nomenclature was uncertain, species names were verified with the on-line Australian

Plant Name Index (Australian National Botanic Gardens, 2007). In the text of this report, flora species

are referred to by both their common and scientific names when first mentioned and common

names only thereafter. Flora common names, where available, have been included in threatened

species tables and the complete flora list in Appendix 1.

Names of vertebrates follow the Census of Australian Vertebrates maintained by the Commonwealth

Department of Environment (DEWHA 2009). In the body of this report vertebrates are referred to by

both their common and scientific names when first mentioned. Subsequent references to these

species cite the common name only. Common and scientific names are included in the fauna list in

Appendix 2.

2.2 Literature and database review

In order to provide a context for the study area, information about flora and fauna from within five

kilometres of the study area (the ‘local area’) was obtained from relevant public databases. Records

from the databases outlined in Table 1 were collated and reviewed.

Table 1: Database searches completed for the report

Database Records Accessed Search

radius

Date of

access

Department of Environment Protected

Matters Search Tool Database

Records of Matters of National

Environmental Significance

(NES) listed under the

provisions of the EPBC Act.

5 km January

2013

Office of Environment and Heritage

(OEH) Atlas of NSW Wildlife

Records of threatened flora and

fauna species listed on the

schedules of the TSC and EPBC

Acts.

5 km January

2013

Birds Australia, New Atlas of

Australian Birds

Records of threatened and

migratory bird species.

5 km January

2013

PlantNet, Rare or Threatened

Australian Plants listing

Rare or Threatened Australian

Plants.

Oatley with

5 km buffer

January

2013

Department of Primary Industries

(DPI), Noxious Weeds Database

Noxious weeds. Hurstville

and

Kogarah

City Council

January

2013

Page 13: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 5 5

Database Records Accessed Search

radius

Date of

access

LGAs

Other sources of biodiversity information:

Relevant vegetation mapping, including:

– Native vegetation of southeast NSW: a revised classification and map for the coast

and eastern tablelands (Tozer et al. 2010).

– The native vegetation of the Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority

area (SMCMA, 2009).

The following was also reviewed:

Transport Access Program: Oatley Station Precinct – Ecological Constraints Assessment (GHD,

2012)

Oatley Station Precinct Accessibility Upgrade – Proposed Site Plan. Drawing TAP-1822-AR-

0006. (GHD, 2013)

Showing Sheet Layout for Detail and Levels of Oatley Railway Station and Interchange

Facilities. Drawing 33700A01.dwg. (DS&P, 2013).

Myles Dunphy Reserve and Wetland Plan of Management (Hurstville City Council, 2013)

2.3 Site investigation

2.3.1 Flora assessment

The flora assessment was undertaken on 15 January 2014 by Ed Cooper (Botanist) with Biosis, who

assessed the vegetation communities of the study area using a combination of random meander

(Cropper, 2003) and vegetation association to determine the vegetation assemblage and the relevant

classification, present within the study area.

A list of flora species was compiled (Appendix 1). The general condition, structure and connectivity of

native vegetation was observed, as well as the effects of current seasonal conditions. Notes were

made on specific issues such as noxious weeds, evidence of management works and general

impacts.

Flora records will be submitted to OEH for incorporation into the Atlas of NSW Wildlife.

2.3.2 Fauna assessment

The fauna assessment was undertaken on 15 January 2014 by Alexandra Cave (Zoologist) with Biosis,

to determine its values for fauna. These were determined primarily on the basis of the types and

qualities of habitat(s) present. All species of fauna observed during the assessment were noted

(Appendix 2) and active searching for fauna was undertaken. This included direct observation,

searching under rocks and logs, examination of tracks and scats and identifying calls. Particular

attention was given to searching for significant species and their habitats, particularly those outlined

in Section 1.2. Fauna species were recorded with a view to characterising the values of the site and

the investigation was not intended to provide a comprehensive survey of all fauna that has potential

to utilise the study area over time.

Page 14: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 6 6

Fauna records will be submitted to OEH for incorporation into the Atlas of NSW Wildlife.

2.3.3 Permits and Licenses

The flora and fauna assessment was conducted under the terms of Basis's Scientific License issued

by OEH under the NP&W Act (SL100758). Fauna survey was conducted under approval 11/355 from

the NSW Animal Care and Ethics Committee.

2.4 Survey limitations

Ecological surveys provide a sampling of flora and fauna at a given time and season. There are a

number of reasons why not all species will be detected at a site during survey, such as species

dormancy and migration and breeding behaviours of some fauna. In many cases these factors do

not present a significant limitation to assessing the overall biodiversity values of a site and potential

habitat for such species was assess during the site investigation.

The current flora and fauna assessment was conducted in mid summer which is not an optimal time

to survey for all species, particularly for some cryptic flora species such as Orchids which have a finite

flowering time.

The tree hollow survey was undertaken from the ground using binoculars to determine the presence

of tree hollows. Where there was uncertainty as to whether hollows had depth these would have

been described as potential tree hollows.

2.5 Legislation and policy

The implications for the project were assessed in relation to key biodiversity legislation and policy

including;

Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, 1999 (EPBC Act);

Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 (EP&A Act), including

– State Environmental Planning Policy No. 19 – Bushland in Urban Areas.

Threatened Species Conservation Act, 1995 (TSC Act).

Native Vegetation Act, 2003 (NV Act).

Noxious Weeds Act, 1993 (NW Act).

National Parks and Wildlife Act, 1974 (NP&W Act).

Kogarah and Hurstville Development Control Plan (DCP), 2002.

Kogarah and Hurstville (Draft) Local Environment Plan (LEP), 2012.

2.6 Mapping

Mapping was conducted using hand-held (uncorrected) GPS units (Garmin GPS Map 62s) and aerial

photo interpretation. The accuracy of this mapping is therefore subject to the accuracy of the GPS

units (generally ± seven metres) and dependent on the limitations of aerial photo rectification and

registration.

Page 15: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 7 7

Mapping has been produced using a Geographic Information System (GIS). Electronic GIS files which

contain our flora and fauna spatial data are available to incorporate into design concept plans.

However this mapping may not be sufficiently precise for detailed design purposes.

Page 16: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 8 8

3. Results

3.1 Ecological Results

The ecological features of the study area are described below and mapped in Figure 2.

A total of 81 flora species (16 native and 65 exotic) as well as eight fauna species were recorded

during the current assessment. Species recorded during the flora and fauna assessment are listed in

Appendix 1 (flora) and Appendix 2 (fauna). Unless of particular note, these species are not discussed

further.

A list of significant species recorded or predicted to occur in the local area is also provided in those

appendices, along with an assessment of the likelihood of the species occurring within the study

area.

3.2 Site context and connectivity

The study area is located in the suburb of Oatley. Oatley is predominately a residential suburb, with

a number of natural bush areas and remnant trees in gardens and along streets. Of particular note

to this project is Myles Dunphy Reserve, which is located to the south-west of the station. Myles

Dunphy Reserve forms a large patch of remnant native vegetation in good condition, and is known to

support a number of threatened flora and fauna species and threatened ecological communities.

The proposed project footprint is located either side of the rail corridor along the entirety of the

Oatley Station platform. Within the development footprint, much of the remnant native vegetation

has been removed or altered with remaining native vegetation in a patchy and highly fragmented

state.

These modified vegetation communities would support opportunistic and resilient native fauna,

often associated with urban habitats. This is further supported by the fauna documented through

observations made during the site visit (refer to Table 14). Due to the presence of the rail corridor,

Mulga Road and Oatley Parade connectivity is almost non-existent other than for mobile avifauna

species.

3.3 Vegetation and fauna habitat

The vegetation and fauna habitat throughout the majority of the study area has been modified by

changes in land use throughout the local area. Remnant vegetation has predominantly been cleared

to make way for residential, commercial, recreational and infrastructure development. Such

development includes the commuter carpark, Oatley Memorial Park, the rail corridor and the

ornamental garden on the corner of Oatley Parade and River Road.

The study area supports four separate vegetation communities based on condition and floristic

composition, including two native vegetation communities and two exotic vegetation communities,

including:

Degraded hinterland sandstone gully forest (native).

Mown exotic grasses and ornamental plantings (exotic).

Modified eucalypt woodland (native).

Page 17: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 9 9

Exotic closed woodland (exotic).

The floristic composition, associated soil type and location of each community is detailed in Table 2

to Table 5, and outlined in Figure 2.

Table 2: Vegetation Community Description – Degraded hinterland sandstone gully forest

Stratum Height

Class

% Cover

Dominant

Species

Description

Canopy 10-30

meters

30-40 %

Eucalyptus pilularis,

Eucalyptus

racemosa,

Angophora costata

Topography, geology and soils

This community is typically associated with the

lower slopes of dry sandstone gullies receiving

800 – 1300 mm of rain per annum (Tozer et. al.

2010). The study area is located in a transitional

area between Lucas Heights and the

predominantly sandstone based Gymea soil

landscapes (Chapman and Murphy, 1989). The

Lucas Heights soil landscape is transitional in

it's own right with both shale and sandstone

influences. The soil profiles across the study

area are likely to have been altered by historic

vegetation removal, development and

introduction of topsoil and organic matter.

Condition and weed occurrence

The degraded hinterland sandstone gully

forest within the study area was present in the

form of scattered remnant trees, confined to

the southern boundary of Boondarra Reserve.

Mature Blackbutt Eucalyptus pilularis, Narrow-

leaved Scribbly Gum Eucalyptus racemosa and a

single Sydney Red Gum Angophora costata

formed the canopy. The midstorey was limited

to scattered Cheese Tree Glochidion ferdinandi

with a groundstorey of mown exotic grasses

including Rhodes Grass Chloris gayana,

Common Couch Cynodon dactylon, Goose

Grass Eleusine tristachya, Paspalum Paspalum

dilatatum and Buffalo Grass Stenotaphrum

secundatum. Additionally, scattered lawn

exotics including Burr Medic Medicago

polymorpha, White Clover Trifolium repens,

Dandelion Taraxacum officinale and Catsear

Hypochaeris radicata.

Occurrence within the study area

Approximately 0.19 ha of Degraded hinterland

sandstone gully forest was recorded within the

study area, none of which occurs within the

subject site (Figure 2). It was located at the

southern extent of Boongarra Reserve and

extended along the fenceline of the western

rail corridor boundary, to the south of the

Upper Midstorey 5-10

meters

10 % Glochidion

ferdinandi

Lower Midstorey 2-5 meters 5 %

Absent

Shrubstorey 1-2 meters 10 %

Absent

Groundstorey <1 meters 70 % Chloris gayana,

Cynodon dactylon,

Eleusine tristachya,

Stenotaphrum

secundatum,

Taraxacum

officinale,

Hypochaeris

radicata,

Medicago

polymorpha,

Trifolium repens

Page 18: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 10 10

access gate.

Fauna habitat features

The degraded hinterland sandstone gully forest

vegetation type within the study area consists

of a handful of remnant habitat trees, including

mature Blackbutt and Narrow-leaved Scribbly

Gum. During flowering periods these tree

species may provide some level of suitable

foraging resources for threatened species, such

as Cockatoos (i.e. Gang-gang Cockatoo

Callocephalon fimbriatum, Glossy Black-

cockatoo Calyptorhynchus lathami and Major

Mitchell's Cockatoo Lophochroa leadbeateri):

however it is considered somewhat unlikely

due to the limited extent of suitable habitat

and proximity of this area to the railway (<

20m) and urban nature of the surrounds.

These feed trees may also provide some

limited foraging resources for the Grey-headed

flying-fox (GHFF) Pteropus poliocephalus,

particularly given there is a known GHFF

population in the adjoining reserve. Scattered

Cheese Trees, where Rainbow lorikeets

Trichoglossus haematodus were observed

foraging on new foliage and fruit, may also

provide potential foraging habitat for

threatened species such as the Little Lorikeet

Glossopsitta pusilla. However, given the

availability of significant areas of larger, better

quality habitat in the locality, the significance of

the scattered habitat resources in this area is

considered to be low. Even so, the trees in this

area are not anticipated to be impacted by the

proposed works. This area also supports an

abundance of coarse woody debris (CWD)

deposits, with old railway sleeper stacks,

littered cement and metal fragments,

surrounded by a thick leaf litter dense with

Casuarina needles.

Conservation Status

Commonwealth EPBC Act: Not listed

NSW TSC Act: Not listed

Based on the lack of key indicator species

within the midstorey, shrubstorey and

groundstorey, this community was not

considered to represent the TSC Act listed EEC

Southern Sydney sheltered forest on transitional

sandstone soils in the Sydney Basin Bioregion.

Page 19: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 11 11

Table 3: Vegetation Community Description – Mown Exotic Grasses and ornamental

plantings

Stratum Height

Class

%

Cover

Dominant Species Description

Canopy 10-30

meters

30-40 %

Jacaranda mimosifolia,

Cupressus

macrocarpa,

X Cupressocyparis

leylandii,

Lophostemon

confertus

Topography, geology and soils

Recreational areas, and associated disturbed

soils, contained mown exotic grasses and

ornamental plantings. Undisturbed subsoils

are likely to be typical of the transitional area

between Lucas Heights and Gymea soil

landscapes (Chapman and Murphy, 1989),

however the topsoils have been modified by

historic; vegetation removal and introduction

of topsoil and organic matter.

Condition and weed occurrence

This community was comprised almost

exclusively of exotic species. The canopy was

sparse, but included Brush Box Lophostemon

confertus, Monterey Cypress Cupressus

macrocarpa and Jacaranda Jacaranda

mimosifolia. Pepper Tree Schinus areira are

common throughout the recreational areas

along with scattered Cocos Palm Syagrus

romanzoffiana and Chinese Elm Ulmus

parvifolia. Dominant shrubs include Abelia sp.,

Photinia sp., Agapanthus Agapanthus praecox

and Strelitzia reginae. Typical groundstorey

species present included Rhodes Grass

Chloris gayana, Common Couch, Goose Grass,

Paspalum Paspalum dilatatum, Buffalo Grass,

Summer Grass Digitaria ciliaris, Paspalum and

Panic Veldtgrass Ehrharta erecta. Scattered

exotic forbs included Red-flowered Mallow

Modiola caroliniana, White Clover, Scarlet

Pimpernel Anagallis arvensis, Oxalis sp and

Catsear. The high proportion of exotic species

and maintained nature of this community

means that is of little botanical value.

Occurrence within the study area

Approximately 1.07 ha of mown exotic

grasses and ornamental plantings were

recorded, throughout the recreational areas

in the study area (Figure 2).

Fauna habitat features

The mown exotic grasses and ornamental

plantings vegetation community provides

little in way of suitable native vegetation and

habitat for threatened fauna. This community

Upper Midstorey 5-10

meters

10 % Schinus areira,

Syagrus

romanzoffiana,

Schefflera actinophylla

Lower Midstorey 2-5

meters

5 %

Ulmus parvifolia,

Lantana camara

Shrubstorey 1-2

meters

10 %

Agapanthus praecox,

Canna x generalis,

Photinia sp.,

Strelitzia reginae

Groundstorey <1 meters 700 % Stenotaphrum

secundatum,

Chloris gayana,

Ehrharta erecta,

Cynodon dactylon,

Eragrostis pilosa,

Digitaria ciliaris,

Gazania linearis,

Erigeron karvinskianus,

Eleusine tristachya,

Modiola caroliniana,

Anagallis arvensis,

Hypochaeris radicata,

Oxalis sp.,

Medicago polymorpha,

Trifolium repens

Page 20: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 12 12

has been planted around a fast-flowing man-

made fountain, which was observed to

provide breeding habitat for the Striped

marsh frog Limnodynastes peronii with floating

egg masses attached to overhanging

vegetation observed. This area is not

considered to provide any potential habitat

for any threatened frogs (refer to Table 15).

Conservation Status

Commonwealth EPBC Act: Not listed

NSW TSC Act: Not listed

Table 4: Vegetation Community Description – Modified eucalypt woodland

Stratum Height

Class

%

Cover

Dominant Species Description

Canopy 10-30

meters

30-40 %

Corymbia maculate,

Angophora costata

Topography, geology and soils

The modified eucalypt woodland is located

around the existing commuter carpark,

inbetween areas of hard standing. These soils

bare little resemblance to the undisturbed

soil profile given the level of previous

disturbance.

Condition and weed occurrence

The modified eucalypt woodland is comprised

of two likely remnant Sydney Red Gums along

with a planted Spotted Gum Corymbia

maculata, Tallowwood Eucalyptus microcorys

and Pepper Tree. A row of Weeping

Bottlebrush Callistemon viminalis have been

planted along the fenceline of the commuter

carpark which, along with Mickey Mouse Plant

Ochna serrulata, form the midstory. The shrub

storey and ground storey is almost entirely

exotic and includes species such as Panic

Veldtgrass, Rhodes Grass, Black-berry

Nightshade Solanum nigrum, Bridal Creeper

Asparagus asparagoides, Morning Glory

Ipomoea indica, Asparagus Fern and the

noxious Lantana, Green Cestrum and

Boneseed Chrysanthemoides monilifera subsp.

monilifera.

Occurrence within the study area

Approximately 0.06 ha of modified eucalypt

woodland was recorded around the

commuter carpark (Figure 2).

Upper Midstorey 5-10

meters

10 % Eucalyptus microcorys,

Schefflera actinophylla

Lower Midstorey 2-5

meters

5 %

Callistemon viminalis,

Ochna serrulata,

Cestrum parqui,

Lantana camara

Shrubstorey 1-2

meters

10 %

Chrysanthemoides

monilifera subsp.

monilifera,

Hedera helix,

Solanum nigrum

Groundstorey <1

meters

700 % Stenotaphrum

secundatum,

Chloris gayana,

Ehrharta erecta,

Anagallis arvensis,

Asparagus aethiopicus

Page 21: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 13 13

Fauna habitat features

This modified eucalypt woodland vegetation

formation comprises of two remnant Sydney

Red Gums along with street plantings of

Spotted Gums, and Tallowwood. This area

provides some level of suitable habitat for

threatened species, such as roosting habitat

for tree-hollow dependent microbats, such as

the Eastern freetail-bat Mormopterus

norfolkensis. The Sydney Red Gums, in

particular, provide good quality habitat trees

for microbats - with large deposits of

exfoliating bark, sections of dead wood and

protruding stags and some small spouts and

hollows providing multiple potential entry

points for microbats. Seasonal flowering of

the trees in this area may also provide

suitable foraging habitat for the GHFF, and a

number of nectarivorous birds, albeit limited.

Conservation Status

Commonwealth EPBC Act: Not listed

NSW TSC Act: Not listed

Page 22: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 14 14

Table 5: Vegetation Community Description – Exotic closed woodland

Stratum Height

Class

% Cover

Dominant Species Description

Canopy 10-30

meters

30-40 %

Eucalyptus

microcorys,

Populus nigra,

Casuarina glauca

Topography, geology and soils

The closed exotic woodland is located adjacent

to the rail corridor, on the southern

embankment. Soils here have been disturbed

by the construction of the railway line and

much of the vegetation is growing out of the

rock ballast embankment.

Condition and weed occurrence

The closed exotic woodland included a

combination of planted native and exotic

species and opportunistic weeds. Lombardy

Poplar Populus nigra, Swamp Oak Casuarina

glauca and two Tallowwood trees1 form the

canopy with a dense midstorey of Cheese

Tree, Camphor Laurel, Green Cestrum,

Lantana and Mickey Mouse Plant. This dense

midstorey has lead to a relatively sparse shrub

and groundstorey strata; however Crofton

Weed Ageratina adenophora, Small-leaved

Privet Ligustrum sinense, Black-berry

Nightshade and Fennel Foeniculum vulgare

were recorded. Exotic vines and scramblers

including Bridal Creeper, Asparagus Fern and

Morning Glory were recorded growing along

the chainlink fence. To the west of the fence, a

row of juvenile Turpentine Syncarpis

glomulifera have been planted.

Occurrence within the study area

Approximately 0.24 ha of exotic open forest

was recorded along the southern rail corridor

embankment of the rail corridor (Figure 2).

Fauna habitat features

The exotic closed woodland vegetation

community fronting the railway corridor

provides very little in way of suitable habitat

for threatened species.

Conservation Status

Commonwealth EPBC Act: Not listed

NSW TSC Act: Not listed

Upper Midstorey 5-10

meters

10 % Cinnamomum

camphora,

Glochidion

ferdinandi,

Syncarpia

glomulifera

Lower Midstorey 2-5 meters 5 %

Ochna serrulata,

Cestrum parqui,

Lantana camara,

Shrubstorey 1-2 meters 10 %

Ageratina

adenophora,

Ligustrum sinense,

Solanum nigrum,

Foeniculum vulgare

Groundstorey <1 meters 700 % Bidens pilosa,

Avena fatua,

Araujia sericifera,

Bromus cartharticus,

Ehrharta erecta,

Anagallis arvensis,

Asparagus

aethiopicus

1 the two mature Eucalypts were determined to be Tallowwood based on observations of the bark from the rail

corridor fence and of the foliage using binoculars from the platform. Access to the rail corridor for fruit collection

was not possible.

Page 23: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 15 15

3.4 Threatened flora, fauna and ecological communities

3.4.1 Threatened species

No EPBC Act or TSC Act listed threatened flora or fauna species were identified within the study area

during the assessment conducted by Biosis on 15 January 2014.

Threatened species recorded or predicted to occur within five kilometres of the study area are listed

in Appendix 1 (flora) and Appendix 2 (fauna) and mapped in Figure 3 (flora) and Figure 4 (fauna). An

assessment of the likelihood of these species occurring in the study area, and an indication of which

habitats or habitat features are likely to support the species is included.

Listed marine and shorebird species that were identified as having the potential to occur are listed in

Table 16. These species are not considered in further detail in this report given the complete absence

of suitable habitat in the study area for these species. A summary of those species recorded or with a

medium or higher likelihood of occurring in the study area is provided in Table 6.

Table 6: Summary of threatened species likely to occur in proximity to the study area

Name Area of value within the study area

Threatened ecological communities – no threatened ecological communities were recorded or

considered likely to occur within the study area.

Threatened flora – no threatened flora was recorded or considered likely to occur within the

study area.

Threatened fauna – one threatened fauna species was considered to have a medium potential

of being impacted by the proposed works

Eastern Freetail-bat

Mormopterus norfolcencis

The species is considered to have the potential to utilize

foraging and roosting habitat resources in the study area,

and suitable microbat hollows were observed in a number

of trees surrounding the carpark, including two Sydney Red

Gums, and one Spotted Gum. The removal of these trees

has the potential to impact breeding resources for this

species in the locality, if they were found to be utilising the

HBTs on site.

3.4.2 Threatened ecological communities

Background research prior to the site investigation identified that three vegetation communities

were mapped in or adjacent to the study area (Tozer et al. 2010). An analysis of whether these

vegetation communities are representative of threatened ecological communities listed under the

EPBC Act or TSC Act and their occurrence within the study area is provided in Table 7.

Table 7: An analysis of vegetation communities mapped in the study area by Tozer (et al.

2010) are representative of TECs

Vegetation community Threatened Ecological Community

Coastal sandstone ridgetop woodland Coastal sandstone ridgetop woodland (Tozer et

al. 2010) is not considered to be representative of

Page 24: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 16 16

Vegetation community Threatened Ecological Community

any TECs.

This vegetation community was not mapped in

the study area.

Hinterland sandstone gully forest Hinterland sandstone gully forest (Tozer et al.

2010) is not considered to be representative of

any TECs.

Overstorey species in a patch of degraded

hinterland sandstone gully forest mapped in the

southeast of the study area, including remnant

Blackbutt, Narrow-leaved Scribbly Gum, Sydney

Red Gum and Cheese Tree, are diagnostic

overstorey species for Southern Sydney

Sheltered Forest TEC.

However, based on the lack of key diagnostic

species in the groundstorey and midstorey this

vegetation community was not considered

representative of Southern Sydney Sheltered

Forest TEC.

Sydney turpentine ironbark forest Sydney turpentine ironbark forest (Tozer et al.

2010) is listed as a threatened ecological

community (TEC) under both the TSC Act

(Endangered) and the EPBC Act (Critically

endangered).

A focus of the site visit was to determine whether

the patches previously mapped as a TEC, or any

other vegetation, was consistent with the final

determinations for Sydney turpentine ironbark

forest (NSW Scientific Committee, 2011). The

small patch of Sydney turpentine ironbark forest

mapped by Tozer (et al. 2010) does not contain

key diagnostic species and is not considered

representative of the Sydney turpentine ironbark

forest TEC.

Myles Dunphy Reserve, located approximately 80

m southwest of the study area, is comprised of

remnant bushland and wetlands and contains a

relatively large patch of Sydney turpentine

ironbark forest TEC.

3.5 Noxious weeds

Five species listed as noxious within Hurstville and Kogarah City Council LGAs were recorded within

the study area (DPI, 2013). The details of these species, along with the legal requirements, are

outlined in Table 8below.

Page 25: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 17 17

Table 8: Noxious weeds recorded within the study area

Common

Name

Scientific Name Class Legal Requirement

Boneseed Chrysanthemoide

s monilifera

subsp. monilifera

2 The plant must be eradicated from the land and the

land must be kept free of the plant.

Bridal Creeper Asparagus

asparagoides

4 The plant must not be sold, propagated or knowingly

distributed

Green Cestrum Cestrum parqui 3 The plant must be fully and continuously suppressed

and destroyed

Lantana Lantana camara 4 The growth of the plant must be managed in a manner

that reduces its numbers, spread and incidence and

continuously inhibits its reproduction; and the plant

must not be sold propagated or knowingly distributed

Privet (narrow

leaf)

Ligustrum sinense 4 The growth of the plant must be managed in a manner

that reduces its numbers spread and incidence and

continuously inhibits its flowering and reproduction

A full list of exotic species, including declared noxious weeds identified in the study area, are listed in

Appendix 1; Table 12.

Page 26: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

GF

GF

GF

Mulga Road

Oatley Avenue

Frederick Street

Oatle

y Para

de

Rive r

Road River Road

River

Road

River Roa

d

Illawa

rra Ra

ilway

Proposedbridge

and lifts

Proposedcommuter

carpark

060

061

062

0 10 20 30 40 50

MetresMatter: 17612Date: 24 February 2014, Checked by: NMG, Drawn by: JMS, Last edited by: ngarveyLocation:P:\17600s\17612\Mapping\17612_F2_Veg

Biosis Pty LtdBallarat, Brisbane, Canberra, Melbourne, Sydney, Wangaratta & Wollongong ±

Acknowledgements: Imagery provided by Transport for New South Wales

LegendGF Hollow Bearing Tree

Subject SiteStudy AreaDegraded Hinterland Sandstone Gully ForestExotic Closed WoodlandModified Eucalypt WoodlandMown Exotic Grasses and Ornamental Plantings

Scale 1:1,000 @ A3Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 56

Figure 2: Vegetation Communities and Fauna Habitat Features of the Study Area

Page 27: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

GFGFGF

GFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGF GFGFGF

GF

GF

GFGFGFGFGF

GFGFGFGFGFGF

GF

GF

GFGF

GFGFGFGF

GFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGF

GFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGF

GFGF

GFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGF

GF GFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGF GFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGF

GFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGF GF

GFGF

GFGF

SUTHERLANDSUTHERLANDSHIRESHIRE

Acac

ia Ro

ad

Princ

es H

ighwa

y

Princes Highway

5458

5458

5458

438643865458 3363

33633363

2618

62064248 4248385742483857 4248

3860

38605458

3860

5458 6206545812546

125467752

3857 33633857

385738576206

3857

3857

4875 62063860

386038603857

38602234

6206 37283857 96723860

3857

38573860 3860 38603860

38603860

0 400 800 1,200 1,600 2,000

Metres

LegendStudy AreaSearch area

Threatened floraGF 12546; Hibbertia stricta subsp. furcatulaGF 2234; Wilsonia backhouseiGF 2618; Leucopogon exolasiusGF 3363; Maundia triglochinoidesGF 3728; Acacia bynoeanaGF 3857; Acacia prominensGF 3860; Acacia pubescensGF 4248; Melaleuca deaneiGF 4386; Caladenia tessellataGF 4875; Deyeuxia appressaGF 5458; Persoonia hirsutaGF 6206; Tetratheca junceaGF 7752; Epacris purpurascens var. purpurascensGF 9672; Acacia terminalis subsp. terminalis

±Ma tter: 17612Da te : 29 Jan u ary 2014, Ch ecked by: N M G , D raw n by: JM S, La st edited by: jsh ep h erdLocation :P:\17600s\17612\M a pp in g\17612_F3 _ThrFlora 5km

Biosis Pty LtdBallarat, Brisbane, Canberra, Melbourne,

Sydney,Wangaratta & Wollongong

Scale: 1:40,000 @ A3

Figure 3: Threatened Florawithin 5km of the StudyArea

Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 55

Acknowledgements: Topo (c) NSW LPI

Page 28: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

XW

XWXW

_̂XW

XWXWXW XW

_̂XW _̂̂_XW

XWXW _̂̂_̂_̂__̂XW _̂_̂

XWXW _̂_̂XW XW_̂̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂__̂_̂̂__̂ _̂̂_̂_

XWXW

XWXW XW

_̂̂__̂̂__̂XW _̂XWXWXW

_̂!(

_̂̂__̂̂_XWXW

_̂XW XWXW_̂

_̂XW

_̂XW

_̂̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_

SUTHERLANDSUTHERLANDSHIRESHIRE

Pr inces Highway

Hillcrest Avenue

Corea

Stree

t

King Georges Road

Forest Road

Menai Road

Belm

ore Ro

ad

Bates Drive

Tara Street

Oatle

y Par a

de

Rai lw

ayCr

escen

t

Tivoli

Espla

nade

Toron

toPa

rade

Billa

Road

Evelyn Street

Little

Moon Trail

Box Road

Com oRoa

d

Ramsgate RoadAlford

sPoin

t Roa

d

Hurstville Road

C ar avan Head Road

Park Road

King Georges Road

Gung

ah Ba

y Roa

d

G eorges Ri ver Crescent

The Boulevarde

Oyster Bay Road

Bangor BypassRiver Road

Taren

Point

Road

Alford

s Poin

t Roa

d

River Road

The Es pl ana

de

Box Road

Lorrai

neStr

eet

King Georges RoadBoundary Road

Henry Lawson Drive

Woniora RoadBelgra ve

Esp la nade

Fores

tRoad

B rus

hwoo

dDriv

e

Bates Driv e

Old FerryRoad

Holt Road

Fowler Road

Wolge

r Stre

et

Washin gtonDrive

Soldi

ersRo

ad

Freya

Stree

t

Forest Road

Tudar Roa d

PortHa ckingRoad

Connells Point R

oad

Rocky

Point

Road

1280

1280 1280

02481162

12801280

1834

03091162 0248

1162

12801280 02650270

027002481280 0248

12801162 026802681280

183401300241

02480248024806030248

116212801280

02300248

02300248

0260 024818341097

1280

0023311602680309

0241030912801329

00231280 12800603

024812800603

1280

01610161

0309

0130

0248

0241

0130

0130

0183

0248

0405

0 360 720 1,080 1,440 1,800

Metres

LegendThreatened Fauna!( Amphibians_̂ BirdsXW Mammals

Search AreaStudy Area

±Ma tter: 17612Da te : 29 Jan u ary 2014, Ch ecked by: AC , D raw n by: JM S, La st edited by: jsh ep h erdLocation :P:\17600s\17612\M a pp in g\17612_F4 _ThrFa un a_au toG en

Biosis Pty LtdBallarat, Brisbane, Canberra, Melbourne,

Sydney,Wangaratta & Wollongong

Scale: 1:36,000 @ A3

Figure 4: Threatened Faunawithin 5km of the StudyArea

Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 55

Acknowledgements: Topo (c) NSW LPI

Species listAmphibians3116 - Red-crowned Toadlet

Birds0023 - Superb Fruit-Dove0130 - Pied Oystercatcher0139 - Lesser Sand-plover0161 - Curlew Sandpiper0183 - Black-necked Stork0230 - Square-tailed Kite0241 - Osprey0248 - Powerful Owl0260 - Little Lorikeet0265 - Glossy Black-Cockatoo0268 - Gang-gang Cockatoo0270 - Major Mitchell's Cockatoo0309 - Swift Parrot0405 - Olive Whistler0603 - Regent Honeyeater

Mammals1097 - Long-nosed Bandicoot1162 - Koala1280 - Grey-headed Flying-fox1329 - Eastern Freetail-bat1834 - Eastern Bentwing-bat

Page 29: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 21

4. Potential impacts and recommended mitigation measures

This section identifies the potential impacts of the proposed Oatley station upgrade on the ecological values

of the subject site and study area (Section 4.1) and includes recommendations to assist TfNSW to avoid and

minimise the impacts on biodiversity values (Section 4.2). The proposed upgrades to Oatley stations are

outlined in Section 1 and shown in Figure 5.

4.1 Potential impacts

4.1.1 Direct impacts

The direct impact zone is defined as the construction footprint, forming a corridor from the bus shelter on

Oatley Parade west to Mulga Street in addition to the commuter carpark on Oatley Parade (Figure 5).

The proposed alignment of the bridge and lift infrastructure will require 0.06 ha of vegetation clearing,

including:

0.01 ha of Mown Exotic Grasses and Ornamental Plantings

0.04 ha of Modified Eucalypt Woodland.

0.01 ha of Exotic Closed Woodland.

The proposed works are likely to result in the removal of 24 trees, as outlined in Table 18 (Appendix 3) and

shown in Figure 6. Of these, 12 are native species. A further 14 trees have a moderate likelihood of impact

due to their proximity to the proposed works. Of these nine are native species. The extension of the

commuter carpark is likely to require the clearing of the Sydney Red Gum and Pepper tree in the centre and

potentially the row of Spotted Gum and Tallowwood and the mature Sydney Red Gum in the northern corner.

The current scope of the project does not include the removal of any mature vegetation from within the

Degraded hinterland sandstone gully forest community. Although not considered to represent a TEC, these

trees are of ecological value and recommendations regarding their protection have been made in Section 4.2.

4.1.2 Indirect impacts

The indirect impact zones are the areas where impacts are likely to be temporary and restricted to the

construction phase of the upgrade.

Indirect impacts are likely to be greatest in close proximity to the subject site, however the proposal has the

potential to have indirect impacts at greater distance particularly where stockpiling or equipment storage is

required. Potential indirect impacts to vegetation include the following:

Damage to remnant native trees during movement of soil by machinery across the site.

Damage to native vegetation resulting from machinery and soil compaction.

Introduction of noxious weed species or spread of those currently occurring within the study area

construction plant and equipment.

The introduction of soil pathogens.

Soil contamination resulting from fuel spills or other contamination.

Page 30: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 22

As only a Reference Design is currently available which may be subject to change, the indirect impact zone is

considered to include the entirety of the study area (less direct impacts), totaling approximately 1.5 ha of

largely landscaped exotic vegetation, including:

0.19 ha of Degraded hinterland sandstone gully forest

0.02 ha of Modified eucalypt woodland

1.06 ha of Mown exotic grasses and ornamental plantings

0.23 ha of Exotic closed woodland

In addition to the impacts outlined above, various compound areas will be required for the storage of

equipment and infrastructure. The location of these compound areas is yet to be confirmed; however

potential areas within the study area have been identified and categorised based on their ecological values

(Figure 5). The grading system is as follows;

Category 1 – Ideal.

– Includes areas of hard standing with no ecological value.

Category 2 – Preferred.

– Includes mown exotic grasses that will recover quickly from disturbance. The Category 2

patch to the east of Oatley Parade is comprised of the mown areas surrounding remnant

trees.

Category 3 – Possible.

– Includes landscaped vegetation with relatively little ecological value. Category 3 areas should

only be used where no viable alternative Category 1 or 2 sites are available.

Category 4 – No Go Zones.

– Includes mature native and exotic canopy species that should be avoided.

Amelioration measures to minimise the potential for indirect impacts on the vegetation to be retained are

discussed in Section 6.

4.1.3 Impacts to threatened flora and ecological communities

No TSC act or EPBC Act listed TECs were recorded within the study area.

No threatened flora species were identified during the site assessment or are considered likely to occur

within the study area, and therefore no direct or indirect impacts are anticipated.

There is potential for removal of a number of trees surrounding the carpark, including two Sydney Red Gums,

and one Spotted Gum, to impact on roosting and breeding resources for the Eastern Freetail-bat

4.1.4 Impacts to fauna habitat

The proposed railway station upgrade will cause some localised disturbance to potential fauna habitat

associated with the railway corridor, including:

Three hollow-bearing trees which provide some scattered seasonal potential foraging habitat for

various avifauna species, such as the Grey-headed flying-fox, and multiple small hollows, stags,

spouts and fissures (refer to Plate 2) that provide potential roosting resources for microbats

including the Eastern Freetail-bat.

Foraging resources, such as the Cheese Trees, which may support a variety of frugivorous birds.

Page 31: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 23

Injury or death of resident or visiting fauna may result during the clearing of vegetation, and activities related

to the removal of habitat trees. Some species can more readily evade injury by flying (birds). Many species,

however, are unlikely to move quickly enough to avoid being injured. For example, many smaller ground-

dwelling species, such as frogs, lizards and snakes, are unable to move rapidly and have little space to find

refuge within the study area.

Plate 1: Sydney Red Gum HBT showing spouts, fissures and associated stags

4.1.5 Habitat fragmentation and increased edge effects

Habitat fragmentation is the division of a single area of habitat into two or more smaller areas, with a new

habitat type occurring in the area between the fragments. This new dividing habitat type is often artificial and

inhospitable to the fauna species remaining within the fragments and can provide suitable conditions for

weed species to establish, which may out-compete native flora species.

The vegetation communities within the subject site are currently highly fragmented and edge affected,

showing a high proportion of exotic species. The Proposal is unlikely to further increase fragmentation or

edge effects on these communities since the patch sizes are small and have evidence of disturbance

throughout.

As the site is highly urbanized it is unlikely that the Proposal will create or extend any barriers to movement

for flora and fauna.

4.1.6 Impacts on embankment stability

The western rail embankment appears to be constructed from a combination of railway sleepers, ballast and

fill. A number of star picket's are protruding from the embankment at precarious angles suggesting that the

current level of stability is poor.

Mature trees and shrubs will require removal from the western rail embankment to facilitate construction of

the over bridge. The extent to which the embankment is being stabilised by this vegetation is unclear;

however a precautionary approach should be adopted to minimize the risk of slipping or collapse during

vegetation removal.

Page 32: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 24

4.2 Recommended mitigation measures

The principal mechanism to reduce impacts on biodiversity values within the study area will be to minimise

removal of native vegetation and fauna habitat by restricting the encroachment of the works on adjacent

native vegetation.

The principal means to reduce impacts on biodiversity values within the study area will be to avoid and

minimise removal of native vegetation and habitat.

The Oatley Station Precinct Ecological Constraints Assessment (GHD, 2012) outlined the key constraints of the

study area as the mapped area of Degraded hinterland sandstone gully forest (Figure 2), mapped as very

highly constrained, and the Modified eucalypt woodland (Figure 2) mapped as moderately constrained.

Having determined that the Degraded hinterland sandstone gully forest within the study area is not

consistent with the TSC Act listed TEC Southern Sydney sheltered forest, this vegetation is considered to be

moderately constrained.

The majority of the study area was determined to be of relatively low biodiversity value because of historic

disturbance which has lead to broad scale clearing of native vegetation and substantial recruitment of exotic

species. It would appear that the results of the constraints assessment have been taken into consideration

when deciding upon the alignment of the reference design, which is sympathetic with the biodiversity values

which are present.

The following mitigation measures would be implemented to avoid and minimise potential impacts to

ecological values during and after the construction phase of the proposed upgrade:

Existing native vegetation would be retained where possible.

Tree protection zones, including root protection zones and canopy protection zones, should be

established around remnant in accordance with AS 4970 – 2009. An approximate alignment for

fencing for the Degraded hinterland sandstone gully forest remnant trees is marked in Figure 6.

Additional fencing may be required for remnant trees to the east of Oatley Parade once the final

location of construction compounds is determined.

Construction staff would be inducted to an appropriate level and made aware of the importance of

the remnant trees within the Degraded hinterland sandstone gully forest.

The vegetation within the Exotic closed woodland community of the subject site is of relatively low

ecological value; however it is currently stabilising the western railway embankment. The current

extent of this stabilisation is unknown, therefore its removal should be carried out in a precautionary

manner. Where possible, stumps would be left in situ and poisoned with an appropriate herbicide to

prevent regrowth. If complete removal of trees providing substantial stabilisation is required, addition

advice regarding engineering works may need to be sought.

Construction compounds should be located in the lowest category area that is viable. Where Category

1 areas are not available, areas of native vegetation should be rehabilitated following construction

activities. The removal of native or mature canopy species for compound purposes should be

avoided.

Prevent the dispersal of weed seed or soil born pathogens into native vegetation through the

implementation of vegetation hygiene protocols for footwear, vehicles, heavy plant and machinery.

Be aware of nesting fauna within shrubby vegetation. Avoid permanent removal of these occupied

habitats wherever possible. Where vegetation removal/maintenance must take place, wait until the

nesting fauna have moved on.

Page 33: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 25

Appropriately designed sediment and erosion controls should be installed and maintained during

excavation works to prevent any potential sediment runoff entering Myles Dunphy Reserve.

There is potential to improve the quality of the Exotic closed woodland community either side of the

overbridge alignment by engaging a bush regeneration contractor to remove exotic species,

particularly noxious weeds from this area, and revegetate these areas with endemic native species.

On the eastern side of the station:

– The potential for a “green wall” to the forecourt to soften any areas of blank stair wall would

be investigated. Proposed species would be a combination of natives and introduced

species selected to complement the existing vegetation within the Douglas Cross Gardens.

– A terraced rock garden bed would be provided to capture the change of grade between the

forecourt and Douglas Cross Gardens

On the western side of the station:

– Existing vegetation would be retained where possible.

– The disturbed embankments would be re-vegetated. Advanced trees would be planted to

filter views, provide a gateway to the station overpass entrance and reduce the scale of the

proposed overpass.

In the commuter car park:

– Existing vegetation would be retained and protected where possible.

– To soften hard treatments, low planting would be introduced.

Generally, new vegetation will be used to replace vegetation removed, in line with Transport Projects Division

(TPD) Vegetation Offset Guide. Plants species used in revegetation for the Proposal would be based on a

number of guiding documents and existing site plant species. Native and endemic species would be used

where appropriate. There would be compliance with appropriate standards for soils, mulches etc.

Details of the trees to be removed, along with the likelihood or removal, is outlined in Appendix 3. The

likelihood of removal has been determined based on the drawings provided to Biosis and are therefore mays

be subject to change. Based on the small size and lack of community structure of the patch of trees to be

removed, it is considered appropriate to use the TfNSW Single tree offsets (TfNSW, 2013) calculator to

determine the offset requirement for this proposal. Based on the TAP-1822-AR-0006 drawing, it has been

determined that three large trees (DBH >60 centimetres) and 21 medium trees (DBH 15 to 60 centimetres)

will require removal. In accordance with the Single tree offsets calculator, a minimum of 112 trees should be

planted to compensate the vegetation to be cleared. Based on trees present within native vegetation

communities on-site it is recommended a mix of Spotted Gum, Sydney Red Gum, Tallowood and Turpentine

are used.

Page 34: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

Mulga Road

Oatley Avenue

Oatle

y Para

de

Rive r

Road

Frederick Street

River Road

River

Road

River

Road

Illawarr

a Railw

ay

Proposedbridge

and lifts

Proposedcommuter

carpark

Acknowledgement: Imagery provided by Transport for New South Wales

Matter: 17612Date: 03 March 2014,Checked by: NMG, Drawn by: JMS, Last edited by: ngarveyLocation:P:\17600s\17612\Mapping\

LegendStudy AreaSubject Site

Proposed construction zones/compounds/laydown areasCategory 1 - IdealCategory 2 - PreferredCategory 3 - PotentialCategory 4 - No go zone

Scale 1:1,500 @ A4, GDA 1994 MGA Zone 56

0 10 20 30 40

Metres ±Biosis Pty LtdBallarat, Brisbane, Canberra, Melbourne, Sydney, Wangaratta & Wollongong

Page 35: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

k

k

k

kk

k

k

kk

k

k

k

kkk

kk

kkkkk

kkk

kkk

k

k

k

kkkk

kkkkkkkk

1

2

3

54

6

7

8

9

10

13

17

141516

1112

1819202122

2324

2526

272829

30

31

363738

39

4041 4243 3233 3435

34m

26m

22m

30m

22m

36m

38m

34m

20m

30m

24m 40m

32m

32m

26m

32m

30m

34m

28m

38m

36m

34m

30m

Frederick Street

Mulga Road

Oatle

y Para

de

Rive r

Road

River

Road

Oatley Avenue

River Road

River

Road

Illawarra RailwayProposed

bridgeand lifts

Proposedcommuter

carpark

0 8 16 24 32 40

MetresMatter: 17612Date: 26 February 2014, Checked by: NMG, Drawn by: JMS, Last edited by: ngarveyLocation:P:\17600s\17612\Mapping\17612_F6_Treestoberemoved

Biosis Pty LtdBallarat, Brisbane, Canberra, Melbourne, Sydney, Wangaratta & Wollongong ±

Acknowledgements: Imagery provided by Transport for New South Wales

Legend<all other values>

LikelihoodOfRemovalk Highk Lowk Moderate

Approximate alignment of exclusion fencingSubject SiteStudy Area

Scale 1:800 @ A3Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 56

Figure 6: Trees to be removed

Page 36: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 28

5. 4. Biodiversity Legislation and Government Policy

This section provides an assessment of the project against key biodiversity legislation and government policy.

Where available, links to further information are provided. This section does not describe the legislation and

policy in detail and guidance provided here does not constitute legal advice.

5.1 Commonwealth

5.1.1 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, 1999

The EPBC Act applies to developments and associated activities that have the potential to significantly impact

on Matters of National Environmental Significance (NES) protected under the Act.

Link for further information including a guide to the referral process is available at:

http://www.environment.gov.au/epbc/index.html

Matters of NES relevant to the project are summarised in Table 9. It includes an assessment against the EPBC

Act policy statements published by the Australian Government which provide guidance on the practical

application of EPBC Act including.

Table 9: Assessment of the project against the EPBC Act

Matter of NES Project specifics Assessment against Guidelines

Threatened

species and

ecological

communities

59 fauna and 24 flora species have been

recorded or predicted to occur in the

project search area. The likelihood of these

species occurring in the study area is

assessed in Appendix 1 (flora) and

Appendix 2 (fauna).

None of these species are likely to occur

and the proposed upgrade is unlikely to

constitute a significant impact.

Migratory

species

35 migratory species have been recorded

or predicted to occur in the locality.

While some of these species would be

expected to use the study area on

occasions, and some of them may do so

regularly or may be resident, it is not

considered to provide important habitat

for an ecologically significant proportion of

any of these species.

On the basis of criteria outlined in the relevant Significant Impact Guidelines it is considered unlikely that a

significant impact on a Matter of National Environmental Significance would result from the proposed action.

A referral to the Australian Government Minister for the Environment to determine whether the action

requires approval under the EPBC Act is not required.

Page 37: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 29

5.2 State

5.2.1 Threatened Species Conservation Act, 1995

The TSC Act provides for the protection and conservation of biodiversity in NSW through the listing of

threatened species, populations and communities; key threatening processes; and critical habitat for

threatened species, populations and communities.

Native vegetation within the study area is not a listed community; however contains threatened flora or fauna

species, or habitat for them. Impacts to threatened species, populations and communities must be assessed

through the Assessment of Significance (formerly known as the “7-part test”) process under Section 5A of the

EP&A Act (refer to Section 5.2.2 below).

Habitat critical to the survival of an endangered or critically endangered species, population or ecological

community can be identified under the TSC Act and listed on the Register of Critical Habitat kept by the OEH.

The study area does not contain declared ‘critical habitat’.

A licence to harm/pick/damage habitat of a threatened species, population or community or damage critical

habitat is / is not required.

Key threatening processes, defined as a process that threatens, or could threaten, the survival or evolutionary

development of species, populations or ecological communities, are identified under the TSC Act and

considered during the Assessment of Significance. The proposed upgrade has the potential to constitute or

exacerbate KTPs outlined in Table 10.

Table 10: Key threatening processes listed under the TSC Act, likely to be constituted or

exacerbated by the proposed upgrade

Key threatening process Activity like to constitute or exacerbate the KTP

Clearing of native vegetation The proposal will result in the clearing of individual

remnant trees and shrubs in the modified eucalypt

woodland communities and exotic closed woodland

community.

Infection of native plants by Phytophthora

cinnamomi

No Phytophthora was identified during the site

assessment, however the introduction of personnel

and construction equipment to the subject site has

the potential to establish it.

Introduction and Establishment of Exotic Rust

Fungi of the order Pucciniales pathogenic on

plants of the family Myrtacea

No exotic rust fungi was identified during the site

survey, however the introduction of personnel and

construction equipment to the subject site has the

potential to establish it.

Invasion and establishment of exotic vines and

scramblers

Exotic vines and scramblers including Moth Vine,

Morning Glory and Asparagus Fern are present on

site and the construction work has the potential to

further spread these.

Invasion of native plant communities by African

Olive Olea europaea L. subsp. cuspidate

No African Olive was recorded within the study area

however the proposed upgrade has the potential to

introduce it.

Invasion, establishment and spread of Lantana

camara

Lantana was recorded across the study area but

particularly on the western rail embankment around

Page 38: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 30

Key threatening process Activity like to constitute or exacerbate the KTP

Boongarra Reserve.

Invasion of native plant communities by

Chrysanthemoides monilifera (bitou bush and

boneseed)

Boneseed was recorded along the western fence of

the commuter carpark and could be spread by the

proposed upgrade.

Invasion of native plant communities by exotic

perennial grasses

Various exotic grasses were identified during the site

assessment, particularly in the mown exotic grass

and ornamental plantings community

Loss and degradation of native plant and animal

habitat by invasion of escaped garden plants,

including aquatic plants

Garden escapee species were recorded across the

study area and were dominant in the mown exotic

grass and ornamental planting community.

Loss of hollow-bearing trees three HBTs are proposed to be removed as part of

the Oatley station upgrade, and there is considered

to be some potential for roosting habitat of

threatened microbats to be impacted.

The proposed upgrade does have the potential to trigger a number of KTP's; however based on the

historically disturbed nature of the work and the restricted nature of vegetation removal, it is unlikely that any

potential increase will be significant.

5.2.2 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979

The EP&A Act was enacted to encourage the proper consideration and management of impacts of proposed

development or land-use changes on the environment (both natural and built) and the community. The Act is

administered by the NSW Department of Planning and Infrastructure.

Sections of the EP&A Act of primary relevance to the natural environment are considered further below in

relation to the current proposal.

5.2.2.1 Assessment of Significance (Section 5A)

Section 5A of the EP&A Act requires proponents and consent authorities to consider if a development will

have a significant effect on threatened species, populations or communities listed under the TSC Act and FM

Act. Section 5A (and Section 9A of the TSC Act) outlines seven factors that must be taken into account in an

AoS. Where any AoS determines that a development will result in a significant effect to a threatened species,

population or community a Species Impact Statement (SIS) is required.

Table 11 summarises the potential for the proposed development to have a significant effect on the

threatened flora and fauna species, populations or communities deemed to have a medium or greater

likelihood of occurrence within the study area (refer to Section3.4) and determines the need for an AoS under

Section 5A of the EP&A Act.

Page 39: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 31

Table 11: Potential for impacts to threatened species listed on the TSC Act

Name EPBC

Act

TSC

Act

Habitat

Values

within

study area

Potential Impacts on Threatened

Species

Impact

Assessment

Required? Adversely

affect

stages of

the

lifecycle

of the

species?

Loss or

disturbance

of limiting

foraging or

breeding

resources?

Fragmentation

of limiting

habitat?

Ecological communities - no threatened ecological communities were identified as having potential to occur

within the study area.

Flora species – no threatened flora species were identified as having potential to occur within the study

area.

Fauna species

Eastern Freetail

Bat

- V1 Potential

roosting

resources in

HBTs to be

removed

within the

study area

Potential

(unlikely)

No No No

*A significant impact is not likely to result from the proposal as a result of NSW listed biota, therefore an SIS is not required.

Assessments of Significance have been prepared for those species, populations or communities that are

deemed likely to be subject to negative impacts and are provided in Appendix 1 and 2. They indicate that a

significant impact is not likely to result from the proposal. A Species Impact Statement is therefore not

required.

5.2.2.2 State Environmental Planning Policies

State Environmental Planning Policies (SEPPs) outline policy objectives relevant to state wide issues. No SEPPs

are relevant to the current development

5.2.3 Native Vegetation Act, 2003

The NV Act provides for, encourages and promotes the management of native vegetation on a regional basis.

Under the NV Act no clearing of native vegetation is allowed except in accordance with prior development

consent from the relevant Council or under a Property Vegetation Plan (PVP) approved by the relevant

Catchment Management Authority.

Under Part 3 of Schedule 1 of the NV Act, Kogarah and Hurstville LGAs are classified as an urban area and

exempt from the provisions of the Act.

5.2.4 Noxious Weeds Act 1993

The NW Act was enacted to provide for the identification, classification and control of noxious weeds. Plants

declared as noxious weeds are currently listed under Weed Control Order No. 28 Declaring Certain Plants to

be Noxious Weeds published in the New South Wales Government Gazette No. 97. (Department of Premier

Page 40: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 32

and Cabinet, 2011). Link for further information: http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/aboutus/about/legislation-

acts/noxious-weeds

Five species listed as noxious within the Kogarah and Hurstville City Council LGAs were recorded within the

study area (DPI, 2013). The details of these along with the legal requirements are outlined in Section 3.5; Table

8. A full list of exotic species, including declared noxious weeds identified in the study area are listed in

Appendix 1.

Page 41: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 33

6. Conclusion

The study area supports two native (Degraded hinterland sandstone gully forest and Modified eucalypt

woodland) and two exotic (Mown exotic grasses and ornamental plantings and Exotic closed woodland)

vegetation communities. These vegetation communities are considered to be in poor condition due to past

disturbance.

The study area is of minimal value for threatened species, with no threatened flora species recorded or

considered likely to occur. The study area supports potential foraging and breeding habitat for one

threatened fauna species; suitable microbat hollows for the Eastern Freetail-bat were observed in a number

of trees surrounding the carpark, including two Sydney Red Gums, and one Spotted Gum.

No threatened ecological communities were recorded.

Five species listed as noxious within Hurstville and Kogarah City Council LGAs were recorded within the study

area.

The proposed upgrade of Oatley station will result in the removal of 0.04 ha of native vegetation (Modified

eucalypt woodland) and 12 native trees, including removal of a number of trees from the commuter carpark.

This includes potential roosting habitat for microbats, including the Eastern Freetail-bat.

In accordance with the Vegetation Offset Guide (TfNSW, 2013), a minimum of 112 native endemic trees

should be planted to compensate the required vegetation clearance. It is recommended that native species

such as Spotted Gum, Sydney Red Gum, Tallowood and Turpentine are used.

In addition to the impacts outlined above, various compound areas will be required for the storage of

equipment and infrastructure. The location of these compound areas is yet to be confirmed; however

potential areas within the study area have been identified and categorised based on their ecological values

(Figure 5).

The proposed bank stabilisation works are unlikely to result in any impacts to native vegetation or fauna

habitat; however the bank may currently be stabilised by mature trees and shrubs, and it is recommended

that the stumps of these trees and shrubs are kept in place to provide stability.

The overall impact of the proposed upgrade of Oatley station to native flora and fauna is considered to be

low. Measures to avoid and mitigate impacts are outlined in Section 4.

It is unlikely that the proposed works will result in a significant impact to threatened species, populations or

communities and additional approvals are not required.

Page 42: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 34

References

DS&P 2013. Showing Sheet Layout for Detail and Levels of Oatley Railway Station and Interchange Facilities.

Drawing 33700A01.dwg.

GHD 2012. Transport Access Program: Oatley Station Precinct – Ecological Constraints Assessment

GHD 2013. Oatley Station Precinct Accessibility Upgrade – Proposed Site Plan. Drawing TAP-1822-AR-0006.

Hanson CE, 2008. High Speed Train Noise Effects on Wildlife and Domestic Livestock in Schulte-Werning et al

(Eds) Noise and Vibration Mitigation. NNFM pgs 26-32. Accessed online 28/1/2014 -

http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-74893-9_4#page-2

Hurstville City Council. 2012, Draft Local Environmental Plan

Hurstville City Council. 2012, Draft Local Environmental Plan - Land Zoning Map - Sheet LZN_006

Hurstville City Council. 2013, Myles Dunphy Reserve and Wetland Plan of Management

Kogarah City Council. 2012, Draft Local Environmental Plan

Kogarah City Council. 2012, Draft Local Environmental Plan - Land Zoning MapSheet LZN_004

NSW Scientific Committee 2012. Sydney Turpentine-Ironbark Forest - Determination to make a minor

amendment to Part 3 of Schedule 1 of the Threatened Species Conservation Act

NSW Scientific Committee 2007. Southern Sydney sheltered forest on transitional sandstone soils in the

Sydney Basin Bioregion - endangered ecological community listing

NSW Scientific Committee 1998. Sydney Turpentine-Ironbark Forest - endangered ecological community

listing

OEH 2012. Southern Sydney sheltered forest on transitional sandstone soils in the Sydney Basin Bioregion -

profile

OEH 2013. Sydney Turpentine-Ironbark Forest – profile

Schell CB &Burgin S. 2003. Swimming against the current: the Brown Striped Marsh Frog Limnodynastes

peronii success story. Australian Zoologist 32 (3): 401-5.

SMCMA 2009, The native vegetation of the Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority area

TfNSW, 2013, Vegetation Offset Guide and associated vegetation offset calculator tool.

Tozer et. al. 2010. Native vegetation of southeast NSW: a revised classification and map for the coast and

eastern tablelands

Page 43: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 35

Appendices

Page 44: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 36

Appendix 1: Flora

Notes to tables:

EPBC Act:

CR - Critically Endangered

EN - Endangered

VU - Vulnerable

TSC Act:

C1 – critically endangered

E1 – endangered (Part 1, Schedule 1)

E2 – endangered (Part 2, Schedule 1)

E4 – presumed extinct (Part 4, Schedule 1)

V1 – vulnerable (Part 1, Schedule 2)

# - Native species outside natural range

** - noxious weed species declared under the

Noxious Weeds Act

Noxious weed status:

SP State prohibited species (Class 1)

RP Regionally prohibited species (Class 2)

RC Regionally controlled species (Class 3)

RR Regionally restricted species (Class 4)

R Restricted plant (Class 5)

Page 45: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 37

A1.1 Flora species recorded from the study area

Table 12: Flora species recorded from the study area.

Family Scientific Name Common Name

Native species

Aizoaceae Carpobrotus glaucescens Pigface

Casuarinaceae Casuarina glauca Swamp Oak

Cyatheaceae Cyathea australis Rough Treefern

Lamiaceae Westringia fruticosa Coastal Rosemary

Lomandraceae Lomandra longifolia Spiny-headed Mat-rush

Myrtaceae Angophora costata Sydney Red Gum

Myrtaceae Corymbia maculata Spotted Gum

Myrtaceae Eucalyptus microcorys Tallowwood

Myrtaceae Eucalyptus pilularis Blackbutt

Myrtaceae Eucalyptus racemosa Narrow-leaved Scribbly Gum

Myrtaceae Lophostemon confertus Brush Box

Myrtaceae Syncarpia glomulifera Turpentine

Phyllanthaceae Glochidion ferdinandi Cheese Tree

Thelypteridaceae Christella dentata Binung

Exotic Species

Adoxaceae Viburnum japonicum

Agavaceae Agave sp Century Plant

Alliaceae Agapanthus praecox Agapanthus

Amaranthaceae Gomphrena celosioides Gomphrena Weed

Amaryllidaceae Amaryllis belladonna Belladonna Lily

Anacardiaceae Schinus areira Pepper Tree

Apiaceae Foeniculum vulgare Fennel

Apocynaceae Araujia sericifera Moth Vine

Apocynaceae Trachelospermum jasminoides

Araceae Monstera deliciosa Fruit Salad Plant

Araliaceae Hedera helix English Ivy

Araliaceae Schefflera actinophylla Umbrella Tree

Arecaceae Syagrus romanzoffiana Cocos Palm

Asparagaceae Asparagus aethiopicus Asparagus Fern

Page 46: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 38

Family Scientific Name Common Name

Asphodelaceae Aloe ciliaris

Asteraceae Ageratina adenophora Crofton Weed

Asteraceae Bidens pilosa Cobbler's Pegs

Asteraceae Chrysanthemoides monilifera subsp. monilifera Boneseed

Asteraceae Erigeron karvinskianus Bony-tip Fleabane

Asteraceae Gazania linearis

Asteraceae Hypochaeris radicata Catsear

Asteraceae Sonchus asper Prickly Sowthistle

Asteraceae Taraxacum officinale Dandelion

Bignoniaceae Jacaranda mimosifolia Jacaranda

Cannaceae Canna x generalis

Convolvulaceae Ipomoea indica Morning Glory

Cupressaceae Cupressus macrocarpa Monterey Cypress

Cupressaceae X Cupressocyparis leylandii

Cyperaceae Cyperus sp

Fabaceae (Faboideae) Genista monspessulana Montpellier Broom

Fabaceae (Faboideae) Medicago polymorpha Burr Medic

Fabaceae (Faboideae) Trifolium repens White Clover

Hemerocallidaceae Hemerocallis sp Daylilly

Hydrangeaceae Hydrangea sp

Lamiaceae Salvia sp Woolly Sage

Lauraceae Cinnamomum camphora Camphor Laurel

Malaceae Photinia sp Japanese Photinia

Malvaceae Modiola caroliniana Red-flowered Mallow

Myrsinaceae Anagallis arvensis Scarlet Pimpernel

Ochnaceae Ochna serrulata Mickey Mouse Plant

Oleaceae Ligustrum sinense Small-leaved Privet

Onagraceae Gaura lindheimeri

Oxalidaceae Oxalis sp

Poaceae Avena fatua Wild Oats

Poaceae Bromus cartharticus Prairie Grass

Poaceae Chloris gayana Rhodes Grass

Page 47: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 39

Family Scientific Name Common Name

Poaceae Cynodon dactylon Common Couch

Poaceae Digitaria ciliaris Summer Grass

Poaceae Ehrharta erecta Panic Veldtgrass

Poaceae Eleusine tristachya Goose Grass

Poaceae Eragrostis pilosa Soft Lovegrass

Poaceae Paspalum dilatatum Paspalum

Poaceae Stenotaphrum secundatum Buffalo Grass

Polygonaceae Acetosa sagittata Rambling Dock

Punicaceae Punica granatum Pomegranite

Rutaceae Murraya paniculata

Salicaceae Populus nigra Lombardy Poplar

Solanaceae Cestrum parqui Green Cestrum

Solanaceae Solanum nigrum Black-berry Nightshade

Strelitziaceae Strelitzia reginae

Tropaeolaceae Tropaeolum majus Nasturtium

Ulmaceae Ulmus parvifolia Chinese Elm

Verbenaceae Lantana camara Lantana

Caprifoliaceae Abelia sp

Page 48: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 40

A1.2 Significant flora species

The following table includes a list of the significant flora species that have potential to occur within the study area. The list of species is sourced from the Atlas of

NSW Wildife and the Protected Matters Search Tool (DSEWPaC; accessed on 10/01/2014).

Likelihood of

occurrence

Potential criteria

High Species recorded on site during current or previous assessment/s.

Aquatic species recorded from connected waterbodies in close proximity to the site during current or previous assessment/s.

Sufficient good quality habitat is present on site or in connected waterbodies in close proximity to the site (aquatic species).

Site is within species natural distributional range (if known).

Species has been recorded within 5 km or from the relevant catchment/basin.

Medium Records of terrestrial species within 5 km of the site or of aquatic species in the relevant basin/neighbouring basin.

Habitat limited in its capacity to support the species due to extent, quality, or isolation.

Low No records within 5 km of the site or for aquatic species, the relevant basin/neighbouring basin.

Marginal habitat present (low quality & extent).

Substantial loss of habitat since any previous record(s).

Negligible Habitat not present on site

Habitat for aquatic species not present in connected waterbodies in close proximity to the site.

Habitat present but sufficient targeted survey has been conducted at an optimal time of year and species wasn’t recorded.

Page 49: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 41

Table 13: Significant flora species recorded / predicted to occur within 5 km of the study area.

Scientific name Common name EPBC

Act

TSC

Act

Most

Recent

Record

Likelihood

of

occurrence

Rationale for

likelihood

Habitat description

Acacia

bynoeana

Bynoe's Wattle VU E1 1898 Low Soil preferences and

vegetation associations

not present within the

study area.

Acacia bynoeana is found in central eastern NSW, in

the following catchment regions –

Hawkesbury/Nepean, Hunter/Central Rivers, Southern

Rivers, and Sydney Metropolitan. More specifically it is

found from the Hunter District (Morisset) south to the

Southern Highlands and west to the Blue Mountains. It

has recently been found in the Colymea and Parma

Creek areas west of Nowra.

It seems to prefer open, sometimes slightly disturbed

sites such as trail margins, edges of roadside spoil

mounds and recently burnt patches.

It grows in sandy clay soils often containing ironstone

gravels. Main vegetation types include heath or dry

sclerophyll forest on sandy soils.

Associated overstorey species include Corymbia

gummifera, Corymbia maculata, Eucalyptus

parramattensis, Banksia serrata and Angophora bakeri.

Flowering period is mainly summer.

Acacia

prominens

Gosford Wattle E2 2008 Low Populations are known

from the Oatley area;

however the disturbed

nature of soil profiles

and high recruitment

of weeds mean it is

unlikely to occur.

Occurs at a few sites along the railway line at

Penshurst, at Carss Bush Park, Carss Park and there is

an unconfirmed siting at Oatley Park, Oatley. Grows in

open situations on clayey or sandy soils.

Flowers from July to September and pods are

produced in September-October.

Page 50: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 42

Scientific name Common name EPBC

Act

TSC

Act

Most

Recent

Record

Likelihood

of

occurrence

Rationale for

likelihood

Habitat description

Acacia

pubescens

Downy Wattle VU V 2010/# Low The species known

from around the

Oatley area; however

the disturbed nature of

soil profiles and high

recruitment of weeds

mean it is unlikely to

occur.

Acacia pubescens is found in Sydney Metropolitan, and

Hawkesbury/Nepean Catchment Management Region,

with concentrated populations around the Bankstown-

Fairfield-Rookwood area and the Pitt Town area, with

outliers occurring at Barden Ridge, Oakdale and

Mountain Lagoon.

It occurs on alluviums, shales and at the intergrade

between shales and sandstones. The soils are

characteristically gravelly soils, often with ironstone.

The species occurs in open woodland and forest, in a

variety of plant communities, including Cooks River/

Castlereagh Ironbark Forest, Shale/ Gravel Transition

Forest and Cumberland Plain Woodland.

Flowers from August to October. The pods mature in

October to December.

Acacia

terminalis

subsp.

terminalis

Sunshine Wattle EN E1 1999 Low The study area is on

the edge of the natural

range for Sunshine

Wattle and soil

association is not

correct.

Occurs in the Sydney Metropolitan Catchment

Authority Region. It has very limited distribution

between Botany Bay to the northern foreshore of Port

Jackson.

Sunshine Wattle occurs in Coastal scrub and Dry

Sclerophyll forest.

Allocasuarina

glareicola

EN E1 # Negligible Soil and vegetation

associations are not

correct. Not previously

recorded within 5 km.

Found in the Hawkesbury/Nepean and Sydney

Metropolitan Catchment Authority Regions. Primarily

restricted to the Richmond (NW Cumberland Plain)

district, but with an outlier population found at

Voyager Point, Liverpool.

Page 51: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 43

Scientific name Common name EPBC

Act

TSC

Act

Most

Recent

Record

Likelihood

of

occurrence

Rationale for

likelihood

Habitat description

Grows in Castlereagh woodland on lateritic soil. Also

found in Dry Sclerophyll forest/Woodland. Associated

species include Eucalyptus parramattensis, Eucalyptus

fibrosa, Angophora bakeri, Eucalyptus sclerophylla and

Melaleuca decora. Common associated understorey

species include Melaleuca nodosa, Hakea dactyloides,

Hakea sericea, Dillwynia tenuifolia, Micromyrtus

minutiflora, Acacia elongata, Acacia brownei, Themeda

australis and Xanthorrhoea minor.

Asterolasia

elegans

EN E1 # Negligible Not previously

recorded within the

study area and

generally occurs

further north on

sandstone dominated

soils.

Occurs north of Sydney, in the Baulkham Hills,

Hawkesbury and Hornsby local government areas. Also

likely to occur in the western part of Gosford LGA.

Known from only six populations in the catchments of

the Colo and Hawkesbury Rivers, only one of which is

wholly within a conservation reserve. Found in

sheltered forests on mid- to lower slopes and valleys

which support sheltered forest on Hawkesbury

Sandstone. The canopy at known sites includes

Syncarpia glomulifera, Angophora costata, Eucalyptus

piperita, Allocasuarina torulosa and Ceratopetalum

gummiferum. The species is considered to be fire

sensitive and reliant on seed germination after

disturbance to maintain populations. A soil seedbank

appears to be established by this species, so for a

number of years following fire or other disturbance the

species may not be apparent, but be present only as

seed in the soil. The size of the seedbank depends not

Page 52: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 44

Scientific name Common name EPBC

Act

TSC

Act

Most

Recent

Record

Likelihood

of

occurrence

Rationale for

likelihood

Habitat description

only on the amount of seed contributed by mature

plants each season, but on the level of dormancy of the

seed which can vary from year to year. The longevity of

each crop of seed in the soil is perhaps 5 - 10 years.

Caladenia

tessellata

Thick Lip Spider

Orchid

VU E1 2008/# Low Unlikely to be found in

such disturbed

vegetation.

Caladenia tessellata is found in the following

Catchment Management Regions Sydney Metropolitan,

Southern Rivers, Hawkesbury/Nepean, and

Hunter/Central Rivers. Currently known from three

disjunct areas: Braidwood on southern tablelands,

Ulladulla on the south coast and three populations in

Wyong area on the Central Coast. It is generally found

in grassy, dry sclerophyll forests/woodland, particularly

those associated with clay loam, or sandy soils.

However, there is one population at Braidwood in

lowland on stony soil. This species only grows in very

dense shrubbery in coastal areas.

Flowers appear between September and November,

but generally late September or early October in extant

southern populations.

Cryptostylis

hunteriana

Leafless Tongue

Orchid

VU V # Negligible Unlikely to be found in

such disturbed

vegetation. Not

previously recorded

within 5 km .

This species typically grows in swamp-heath on sandy

soils chiefly in coastal districts but has also been

recorded on steep bare hillsides. Within the Central

Coast bioregion, this species has been recorded within

Coastal Plains Smooth-barked Apple Woodland and

Coastal Plains Scribbly Gum Woodland. This species

does not appear to have well defined habitat

Page 53: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 45

Scientific name Common name EPBC

Act

TSC

Act

Most

Recent

Record

Likelihood

of

occurrence

Rationale for

likelihood

Habitat description

preferences and is known from a range of

communities, including swamp-heath and woodland.

The larger populations typically occur in woodland

dominated by Eucalyptus sclerophylla, E. sieberi,

Corymbia gummifera and Allocasuarina littoralis;

appears to prefer open areas in the understorey of this

community and is often found in association with the

Cryptostylus subulata.

It occurs in the following Catchment Management

Regions Hawkesbury/Nepean, Hunter/Central Rivers,

Northern Rivers and Southern Rivers. Inconsistent

flowring times Dec-February; Jan-February (in Victoria)

Deyeuxia

appressa

EN E1 1930/# Negligible Not recently recorded

in the area and

considered likely

extinct.

Only occurs in Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Region.

A highly endemic known only from two pre-1942

records in the Sydney area. Was first collected in 1930

at Herne Bay, Saltpan Creek. Was then collected in

1941 from Killara, near Hornsby. Has not been

collected since and may now be extinct. Given that D.

appressa hasn’t been seen in over 60 years, almost

nothing is known of the species' habitat and ecology.

Flowers spring to summer and is mesophytic (grows in

moist conditions).

Epacris

purpurascens

var.

purpurascens

V 2010 Low Not usually associated

with sandstone soils or

such disturbed sites.

Located in the Hawkesbury/Nepean, Hunter/Central

Rivers/and Sydney Metropolitan catchment authority

region - from Gosford in the north, to Narrabeen in the

east, Silverdale in the west and Avon Dam vicinity in the

Page 54: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 46

Scientific name Common name EPBC

Act

TSC

Act

Most

Recent

Record

Likelihood

of

occurrence

Rationale for

likelihood

Habitat description

South.

Grevillea

parviflora

subsp.

parviflora

Small-flower

Grevillea

VU V # Negligible Not previously

recorded within 5 km

and habitat

preferences not

present.

Located in Hawkesbury/Nepean, Hunter/Central Rivers

and Sydney Metropolitan Catchment. Sporadically

distributed throughout the Sydney Basin with the main

occurrence centred in Picton, Appin, Wedderburn and

Bargo. Northern populations are found in the Lower

Hunter Valley. To the west of Sydney, small populations

occur at Kemps Creek & Voyager Point. Grevillea

parviflora ssp. parviflora grows on sandy clay loam soils,

often with ironstone gravels. Soils are mostly derived

from Tertiary sands or alluvium and from the

Mittagong Formation with alternating bands of shale

and fine-grained sandstones. Grevillea parviflora subsp.

parviflora is found on crests, upper slopes or flat plains

in both low-lying areas and on higher topography. The

plant prefers open habitat conditions with the largest

populations in open woodland and along exposed

roadside areas.

G. parviflora subsp. parviflora has been recorded in a

range of vegetation types from heath and shrubby

woodland to open forest. Canopy species vary greatly

with community type but generally are species that

favour soils with a strong lateritic influence including

Eucalyptus fibrosa, E. parramattensis, Angophora bakeri

and Eucalyptus sclerophylla.

Flowering has been recorded between July to

December as well as April-May.

Page 55: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 47

Scientific name Common name EPBC

Act

TSC

Act

Most

Recent

Record

Likelihood

of

occurrence

Rationale for

likelihood

Habitat description

Hibbertia stricta

subsp. furcatula

E1 2011 Low This species has a

discreet range and

habitat at preference

which are not present

within the vegetation

communities within

the study area.

Hibbertia stricta subsp. furcatula is a small shrub

growing to 1.3 m in height and up to 70 cm wide. It is

known to occur in two populations, one in the

southern outskirts of Sydney, and one near Nowra on

the mid-South Coast of NSW. The Southern Sydney

population occurs on both sides of the Woronora River

gorge, near Loftus and in Royal National Park. The

southern population is mainly in the vicinity of Nowra.

Leucopogon

exolasius

Woronora

Beard-heath

VU V 1901 Low Although broadly

suitable habitat may

have previously been

present, likelihood is

low due to the

degraded nature of the

study area.

Occurs in Hawkesbury/Nepean and Sydney

Metropolitan Catchment, restricted to the Woronora

and Grose Rivers. The plant occurs in woodland on

sandy alluvium and rocky sandstone hillsides near

creeks, and on low nutrient soils. Flowering occurs in

August and September. Associated species include

Eucalyptus piperita and E. sieberi and the shrubs

Pultenaea flexilis, Leptospermum trinervium and Dillwynia

retorta.

Maundia

triglochinoides

V 1903 Negligible This species requires

swampy, permanently

inundated habitat

which was not present

in the study area.

Maundia triglochinoides is restricted to Coastal NSW

and extending into southern Queensland. The current

southern limit is Wyong; former sites around Sydney

are now extinct. Catchment Regions include

Hunter/Central Rivers, Northern Rivers and Sydney

Metro. Maundia triglochinoides occurs in permanent

swamps and wetlands on the central and north coasts

of New South Wales.

Melaleuca Biconvex VU V # Negligible None previously Biconvex Paperbark is only found in NSW, with

Page 56: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 48

Scientific name Common name EPBC

Act

TSC

Act

Most

Recent

Record

Likelihood

of

occurrence

Rationale for

likelihood

Habitat description

biconvexa Paperbark recorded within 5 km

of the study area and

there is no preferred

damp alluvial habitat

present.

scattered and dispersed populations found in the Jervis

Bay area in the south and the Gosford-Wyong area in

the north. Catchment regions include: Hunter/Central

Rivers, Hawkesbury/Nepean, Southern Rivers, and

Northern River Catchments.

Biconvex Paperbark generally grows in damp places,

often near streams or low-lying areas on alluvial soils

of low slopes or sheltered aspects.

Flowering occurs over just 3-4 weeks in September and

October.

Melaleuca

deanei

Deane's

Paperbark

VU V 1899 Low No recent records and

associated soils not

present.

Melaleuca deanei occurs in Catchment Management

Regions Hawkesbury/Nepean, Southern Rivers, and

Sydney Metropolitan. Distinctly it occurs in the Ku-ring-

gai/Berowra and Holsworthy/Wedderburn areas. There

are also more isolated occurrences at Springwood (in

the Blue Mountains), Wollemi National Park, Yalwal

(west of Nowra) and Central Coast (Hawkesbury River)

areas. The species grows in wet heath on sandstone

and Dry Sclerophyll Forests. Flowers appear in summer

but seed production appears to be small and

consequently the species exhibits a limited capacity to

regenerate.

Pelargonium sp.

striatellum

(G.W.Carr

10345)

Omeo Stork's Bill EN # Negligible None previously

recorded within 5 km

of the study area and

the modified nature

Pelargonium sp. Striatellum (G.W.Carr 10345) is a

tufted perennial herb. It has a basal leaf rosette and

leafy flowering stems which grow to 15 cm tall, with

fleshy and often extensively branched rhizomes giving

Page 57: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 49

Scientific name Common name EPBC

Act

TSC

Act

Most

Recent

Record

Likelihood

of

occurrence

Rationale for

likelihood

Habitat description

does not provide

potential habitat.

rise to individual plants (ramets) in clonal colonies. The

species is known to occur in habitat usually located just

above the high water level of irregularly inundated or

ephemeral lakes. During dry periods, the species is

known to colonise exposed lake beds. Pelargonium sp.

Striatellum (G.W.Carr 10345) occurs within the South

Eastern Highlands and South East Corner IBRA

Bioregions and the Hawkesbury-Nepean,

Murrumbidgee, Southern Rivers and North East

Natural Resource Management Regions.

Persoonia

hirsuta

Hairy Geebung EN E1 2007/# Low Highly unlikely to occur

in disturbed closed

woodland or

landscaped areas.

Occurs from Gosford to Royal NP and in the Putty

district from Hill Top to Glen Davis where it grows in

woodland to dry sclerophyll forest on sandstone or

rarely on shale. Two subspecies are recognised, P.

hirsuta ssp. hirsuta (Gosford to Berowra and Manly to

Royal NP) and P. hirsuta ssp. evoluta (Blue Mountains,

Woronora Plateau and Southern Highlands). Found in

sandy soils in dry sclerophyll open forest, woodland

and heath on sandstone and shale-sandstone

transition areas.

Pimelea

curviflora var.

curviflora

VU V # Low None previously

recorded within 5 km

of the study area and

the modified nature

does not provide

potential habitat.

Occurring in Hawkesbury/Nepean and Sydney

Metropolitan Catchment Authority Areas. Confined to

the coastal area of Sydney between northern Sydney in

the south and Maroota in the north-west.

Occurs on lateritic soils and shale-sandstone transition

soils on ridge tops in woodland. Associated with Dry

Page 58: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 50

Scientific name Common name EPBC

Act

TSC

Act

Most

Recent

Record

Likelihood

of

occurrence

Rationale for

likelihood

Habitat description

Sclerophyll forests and Coastal valley grassy

woodlands.

Has an inconspicuous cryptic habit as it is fine and

scraggly and often grows amongst dense grasses and

sedges. It may not always be visible at a site as it

appears to survive for some time without any foliage

after fire or grazing, relying on energy reserves in its

tuberous roots.

Flowers October to May.

Pimelea spicata Spiked Rice-

flower

EN E1 # Negligible None previously

recorded within 5 km

of the study area and

no communities or

species associated with

Spiked Rice-flower are

present within the

study area.

Once widespread on the Cumberland Plain, Pimelea

spicata occurs in two disjunct areas, the Cumberland

Plain and the Illawarra. Catchment areas are

Hawkesbury/Nepean, Southern Rivers, and Sydney

Metropolitan Catchment.

In western Sydney, P. spicata occurs on an undulating

topography of substrates derived from Wianamatta

Shale in areas supporting, or that previously

supported, the Cumberland Plain Woodland

Vegetation Community. Associated species include:

Eucalyptus moluccana, E. tereticornis, E.crebra,

Bursaria spinosa, and Themeda australis.

In the Illawarra region, P. spicata is found in open

woodland and also in coastal grassland communities

with emergent shrubs. Dominant species within the

woodland habitat include Eucalyptus tereticornis, E.

eugenioides, Themeda australis, and Lomandra

longifolia. In the coastal Illawarra it occurs commonly in

Page 59: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 51

Scientific name Common name EPBC

Act

TSC

Act

Most

Recent

Record

Likelihood

of

occurrence

Rationale for

likelihood

Habitat description

Coast Banksia open woodland with a more well

developed shrub and grass understorey.

Pimelea spicata flowers sporadically throughout the

year, with flowering likely to depend upon climatic

conditions, particularly rainfall. Flowering times

recorded for P. spicata vary. Rye (1990) noted flowering

period as May - January; Benson and McDougall (2001)

noted peak flowering period as March/ April.

Pterostylis

saxicola

Sydney Plains

Greenhood

EN E1 # Negligible None previously

recorded within 5 km

of the study area and

the modified nature

does not provide

potential habitat.

Restricted to western Sydney between Freemans

Reach in the north and Picton in the south

(Hawkesbury/Nepean and Sydney Metropolitan

Catchment).

Most commonly found growing in small pockets of

shallow soil in depressions on sandstone rock shelves

above cliff lines. The vegetation communities above

the shelves where Pterostylis saxicola occurs are

sclerophyll forest or woodland on shale/sandstone

transition soils or shale soils.

All species of Pterostylis are deciduous and die back to

fleshy, rounded underground tuberoids.

The time of emergence and withering has not been

recorded for this species, however flowering occurs

from October to December and may vary due to

climatic conditions. The above ground parts of the

plant whither and die following seed dispersal and the

plant persists as a tuberoid until the next year.

Page 60: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 52

Scientific name Common name EPBC

Act

TSC

Act

Most

Recent

Record

Likelihood

of

occurrence

Rationale for

likelihood

Habitat description

Streblus

pendulinus

Whalebone Tree EN # Negligible None previously

recorded within 5 km

of the study area and

the modified nature

does not provide

potential habitat.

The species is found in warmer rainforests, chiefly

along watercourses. The altitudinal range is from near

sea level to 800 m above sea level. The species grows

in well developed rainforest, gallery forest and drier,

more seasonal rainforest).

Syzygium

paniculatum

Magenta Lilly

Pilly

VU E1 # Negligible No suitable rainforest

habitat present within

the study area.

Subtropical and littoral rainforest on sandy soils or

stabilised dunes near the sea. Found only in NSW, in a

narrow, linear coastal strip from Bulahdelah to Conjola

State Forest. On the south coast the Magenta Lilly Pilly

occurs on grey soils over sandstone, restricted mainly

to remnant stands of littoral (coastal) rainforest. On the

central coast Magenta Lilly Pilly occurs on gravels,

sands, silts and clays in riverside gallery rainforests and

remnant littoral rainforest communities. The species

occurs in the following Catchment Authority Regions -

Hunter/Central Rivers, Hawkesbury/Nepean, Sydney

Metropolitan, and Southern Rivers.

Tetratheca

juncea

Black-eyed

Susan

VU V 1913 Low No suitable habitat

within the study area.

Tetratheca juncea occurs in the Hunter/Central Rivers

catchment. Specifically to the northern portion of the

Sydney Basin bioregion and the southern portion of

the North Coast bioregion in the local government

areas of Wyong, Lake Macquarie, Newcastle, Port

Stephens, Great Lakes and Cessnock.

It generally prefers well-drained sites and occurs on

ridges, although it has also been found on upper

Page 61: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 53

Scientific name Common name EPBC

Act

TSC

Act

Most

Recent

Record

Likelihood

of

occurrence

Rationale for

likelihood

Habitat description

slopes, mid-slopes and occasionally in gullies.

Vegetation types associated with Tetratheca juncea

include sandy or swampy heath, and dry sclerophyll

forests. Most populations occur in woodland on poor

nutrient sandy soils with good drainage and low

moisture levels.

The majority of populations occur on low nutrient soils

associated with the Awaba Soil Landscape.

Typically found in dense understorey of grasses and

canopy species including Angophora costata, Corymbia

gummifera, Eucalyptus haemastoma and E. capitellata.

Flowers mostly July to Dec.

Thelymitra sp.

Kangaloon

(D.L.Jones

18108)

CE # Negligible None previously

recorded within 5 km

of the study area and

the modified nature

does not provide

potential habitat.

The Kangaloon Sun-orchid is a terrestrial orchid, with a

flower stem growing to 56 cm high. The narrow fleshy

leaf grows to 35 cm long, and has a purplish base. The

plant produces two to 15 dark blue flowers with darker

longitudinal veins. The Kangaloon Sun-orchid is

endemic to New South Wales, and is known from three

locations near Robertson in the Southern Highlands.

Thesium

australe

Austral Toadflax VU V # Negligible No suitable habitat

present.

Found in very small to large populations scattered

across eastern NSW, along the coast, and from the

Northern to Southern Tablelands. Thesium australe is

a root parasite that takes water and some nutrient

from other plants, especially Kangaroo Grass. It is often

found in damp sites in association with Themeda

australe, but also found on other grass species at

Page 62: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 54

Scientific name Common name EPBC

Act

TSC

Act

Most

Recent

Record

Likelihood

of

occurrence

Rationale for

likelihood

Habitat description

inland sites. Occurs on clay soils in grassy woodlands

or coastal headlands.

Wilsonia

backhousei

Narrow-leafed

Wilsonia

V 2007 Negligible Predominantly

associated with

saltmarsh

communities, none of

which were present

within the study area.

In NSW Wilsonia backhousei is found in the Southern

Rivers and Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Area,

specifically on the coast between Mimosa Rocks

National Park and Wamberal north of Sydney (Nelson's

Lake, Potato Point, Sussex Inlet, Wowly Gully,

Parramatt

Page 63: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 55

Appendix 2: Fauna

Below is a list of fauna species recorded from the study area during the present assessment and a list of

significant fauna species recorded or predicted to occur within five kilometres of the study area.

Notes to tables:

EPBC Act:

EX - Extinct

CR - Critically Endangered

EN - Endangered

VU - Vulnerable

CD - Conservation dependent

TSC Act:

C1 – critically endangered

E1 – endangered (Part 1, Schedule 1)

E2 – endangered (Part 2, Schedule 1)

E4 – presumed extinct (Part 4, Schedule 1)

V1 – vulnerable (Part 1, Schedule 2)

* - introduced species

Fauna species in these tables are listed in alphabetical order within their taxonomic group.

Page 64: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 56

A2.1 Fauna species recorded from the study area

Table 14: Vertebrate fauna recorded from the study area (present assessment)

Status Scientific name Common name

Birds

Cracticus tibicen Australian magpie

Cracticus torquatus Grey butcherbird

Manorina melanocephala Noisy miner

Ocyphaps lophotes Crested pigeon

Strepera graculina Pied currawong

Trichoglossus haematodus Rainbow lorikeet

Reptiles

Lampropholis delicata Delicate garden skink

Frogs

Limnodynastes peronii Striped marsh frog

Note: Details on the location of species recorded during the aquatic surveys are provided in A4.2 below.

Page 65: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 57

A4.2 Significant fauna species

The following table includes a list of the significant fauna species that have potential to occur within the study area. The list of species is sourced from the

OEH Bionet Atlas of NSW Wildlife (NSW OEH, 2014, and the Protected Matters Search Tool (DotE; accessed on 6/01/2014).

The most recent record relates to:

# species predicted to occur by the DSEWPaC database (not recorded on other databases)

## species predicted to occur based on natural distributional range and suitable habitat despite lack of records in the databases searched

Year recorded on databases listed above

Table 15: Significant fauna species recorded, or predicted to occur, within 5 km of the study area.

Scientific name Common name EPBC

Act

TSC Most

recent

record

Likelihoo

d of

impacts

Rationale for likelihood Habitat description

Anthochaera

phrygia

Regent

Honeyeater

EN/M E4A 1994 Low This species may forage

within suitable foraging

resources within the study

area on rare occasions;

however the study area is

highly urbanised, and

there is a general lack of

suitable habitat in the

locality (i.e. key eucalypt

species).

A semi-nomadic species occurring in temperate

eucalypt woodlands and open forests. Most

records are from box-ironbark eucalypt forest

associations and wet lowland coastal forests.

Key eucalypt species include Mugga Ironbark,

Yellow Box, Blakely's Red Gum, White Box and

Swamp Mahogany. Also utilises: E. microcarpa, E.

punctata, E. polyanthemos, E. mollucana, Corymbia

robusta, E. crebra, E. caleyi, C. maculata, E.

mckieana, E. macrorhyncha, E. laevopinea and

Angophora floribunda. Nectar and fruit from the

mistletoes A. miquelii, A. pendula, A. cambagei are

also eaten during the breeding season. Regent

Honeyeaters usually nest in horizontal branches

Page 66: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 58

Scientific name Common name EPBC

Act

TSC Most

recent

record

Likelihoo

d of

impacts

Rationale for likelihood Habitat description

or forks in tall mature eucalypts and sheoaks.

Also nest in mistletoe haustoria. An open cup-

shaped nest is constructed of bark, grass, twigs

and wool by the female.

Callocephalon

fimbriatum

Gang-gang

Cockatoo

V, E2 1991 Low This species may forage

within suitable foraging

resources within the study

area on rare occasions;

however the study area is

highly urbanised, lacks

suitable breeding

resources (large hollows)

and there is a general lack

of suitable habitat in the

locality (i.e. forested

habitat).

In summer, occupies tall montane forests and

woodlands, particularly in heavily timbered and

mature wet sclerophyll forests. Also occur in

subalpine Snow Gum woodland and occasionally

in temperate or regenerating forest. In winter,

occurs at lower altitudes in drier, more open

eucalypt forests and woodlands, particularly in

box-ironbark assemblages, or in dry forest in

coastal areas. It requires tree hollows in which to

breed.

Calyptorhynchus

lathami

Glossy Black-

Cockatoo

V, E2 1990 Low The study area is

considered to provide

limited foraging habitat

for this species. However,

the proposed works will

not remove any of these

trees from the study area.

As such, the potential

impacts to this species are

Inhabits forest with low nutrients,

characteristically with key Allocasuarina species.

Tends to prefer drier forest types. Often

confined to remnant patches in hills and gullies.

Breed in hollows stumps or limbs, either living or

dead.

Page 67: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 59

Scientific name Common name EPBC

Act

TSC Most

recent

record

Likelihoo

d of

impacts

Rationale for likelihood Habitat description

considered to be low.

Chalinolobus

dyweri

Large-eared

Pied Bat

VU V # Low This species may forage

within the study area on

occasion; however the

study area does not

support key habitat

components (i.e. extensive

cliffs and caves).

Found mainly in areas with extensive cliffs and

caves, from Rockhampton in Queensland south

to Bungonia in the NSW Southern Highlands. It is

generally rare with a very patchy distribution in

NSW. Roosts in caves (near their entrances),

crevices in cliffs, old mine workings and in the

disused, bottle-shaped mud nests of the Fairy

Martin (Petrochelidon ariel), frequenting low to

mid-elevation dry open forest and woodland

close to these features

Dasyornis

brachypterus

Eastern

bristlebird

EN E1 # Negligible This species is considered

unlikely to utilize habitat in

the study area due to the

highly disturbed nature of

the site and lack of

suitable habitat resources

(i.e. dense heath

vegetation).

They are shy and cryptic and mostly occur in

dense, coastal vegetation. Although secretive,

they are occasionally seen scampering across

open clearings and are easily located by their

loud, melodic song and a harsh, sharp alarm-call.

Habitat is characterised by dense, low vegetation

including heath and open woodland with a

heathy understorey; in northern NSW occurs in

open forest with tussocky grass understorey; all

of these vegetation types are fire prone.

Dasyurus

maculatus

maculatus (SE

Spotted-tail

Quoll

EN V # Low This species is considered

unlikely to utilize habitat in

the study area due to the

The range of the Spotted-tailed Quoll has

contracted considerably since European

settlement. It is now found on the east coast of

Page 68: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 60

Scientific name Common name EPBC

Act

TSC Most

recent

record

Likelihoo

d of

impacts

Rationale for likelihood Habitat description

mainland

population)

highly disturbed and

urbanised nature of the

site and lack of suitable

habitat resources (ie

availability of den sites).

NSW, Tasmania, eastern Victoria and north-

eastern Queensland. Recorded across a range of

habitat types, including rainforest, open forest,

woodland, coastal heath and inland riparian

forest, from the sub-alpine zone to the coastline.

Individual animals use hollow-bearing trees,

fallen logs, small caves, rock crevices, boulder

fields and rocky-cliff faces as den sites. Mostly

nocturnal, although will hunt during the day;

spends most of the time on the ground,

although also an excellent climber and may raid

possum and glider dens and prey on roosting

birds.

Glossopsitta

pusilla

Little Lorikeet V 2012 Low The study area supports a

small amount of foraging

habitat; however there is a

lack of suitable habitat in

the locality (i.e. feed tree

species).

Distributed in forests and woodlands from the

coast to the western slopes of the Great Dividing

Range in NSW, extending westwards to the

vicinity of Albury, Parkes, Dubbo and Narrabri.

Mostly occur in dry, open eucalypt forests and

woodlands. They feed primarily on nectar and

pollen in the tree canopy. Nest hollows are

located at heights of between 2 m and 15 m,

mostly in living, smooth-barked eucalypts. Most

breeding records come from the western slopes.

Heleioporus

australiacus

Giant Burrowing

Frog

VU V # Negligible This species is considered

unlikely to utilize habitat in

The Giant Burrowing Frog is distributed in south

eastern NSW and Victoria, and appears to exist

Page 69: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 61

Scientific name Common name EPBC

Act

TSC Most

recent

record

Likelihoo

d of

impacts

Rationale for likelihood Habitat description

the study area due to the

highly disturbed and

urbanised nature of the

site and lack of suitable

habitat resources (i.e.

close proximity of

breeding habitat).

as two distinct populations: a northern

population largely confined to the sandstone

geology of the Sydney Basin and extending as

far south as Ulladulla, and a southern population

occurring from north of Narooma through to

Walhalla, Victoria. Found in heath, woodland and

open dry sclerophyll forest on a variety of soil

types except those that are clay based. Spends

more than 95% of its time in non-breeding

habitat in areas up to 300 m from breeding sites

Isoodon

obesulus

obesulus

Southern Brown

Bandicoot

EN E1 # Negligible This species is considered

unlikely to utilize habitat in

the study area due to the

highly disturbed and

urbanised nature of the

site and lack of suitable

habitat (i.e. heathy

understorey), and habitat

resources (i.e. suitable

fungi).

The Southern Brown Bandicoot has a patchy

distribution. It is found in south-eastern NSW,

and are generally only found in heath or open

forest with a heathy understorey on sandy or

friable soils. They feed on a variety of ground-

dwelling invertebrates and the fruit-bodies of

hypogeous (underground-fruiting) fungi. Their

searches for food often create distinctive conical

holes in the soil.

Lathamus

discolor

Swift Parrot EN E1 2004 Low Although no breeding

habitat occurs for this

species in NSW, this

species is potential for this

species to utilize foraging

The Swift Parrot occurs in woodlands and forests

of NSW from May to August, where it feeds on

eucalypt nectar, pollen and associated insects.

The Swift Parrot is dependent on flowering

resources across a wide range of habitats in its

Page 70: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 62

Scientific name Common name EPBC

Act

TSC Most

recent

record

Likelihoo

d of

impacts

Rationale for likelihood Habitat description

resources in the study

area (i.e. street planted

Spotted gum) on rare

occasions. Furthermore,

as the proposed works will

not remove these trees

from the study area, the

potential impacts to this

species are considered to

be low.

wintering grounds in NSW. Favoured feed trees

include winter flowering species such as Swamp

Mahogany Eucalyptus robusta, Spotted Gum

Corymbia maculata, Red Bloodwood C.

gummifera, Mugga Ironbark E. sideroxylon, and

White Box E. albens. Commonly used lerp

infested trees include Grey Box E. microcarpa,

Grey Box E. moluccana and Blackbutt E. pilularis.

This species is migratory, breeding in Tasmania

and also nomadic, moving about in response to

changing food availability.

LItoria aurea Green and

Golden Bell Frog

VU E1 # Negligible The study area does not

provide suitable habitat

for this species (i.e.

waterbodies with fringing

aquatic vegetation).

Since 1990 there have been approximately 50

recorded locations in NSW, most of which are

small, coastal, or near coastal populations. These

locations occur over the species’ former range,

however they are widely separated and isolated.

Large populations in NSW are located around

the metropolitan areas of Sydney, Shoalhaven

and mid north coast (one an island population).

There is only one known population on the NSW

Southern Tablelands. Inhabits marshes, dams

and stream-sides, particularly those containing

bullrushes (Typha spp.) or spikerushes

(Eleocharis spp.). Optimum habitat includes

water-bodies that are unshaded, free of

predatory fish such as Plague Minnow

Page 71: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 63

Scientific name Common name EPBC

Act

TSC Most

recent

record

Likelihoo

d of

impacts

Rationale for likelihood Habitat description

(Gambusia holbrooki), have a grassy area nearby

and diurnal sheltering sites available.

LItoria

littlejohni

Littlejohn's Tree

Frog

VU V # Negligible The study area is

considered unlikely to

provide suitable habitat

for this species, due to the

low altitude of the site,

lack of suitable breeding

habitat - aquatic

waterbodies, and non-

breeding habitat (i.e.

heath-based forests) in

the vicinity.

The majority of records are from within the

Sydney Basin Bioregion with only scattered

records south to the Victorian border and this

species has not been recorded in southern NSW

within the last decade. Records are isolated and

tend to be at high altitude. This species breeds in

the upper reaches of permanent streams and in

perched swamps. Non-breeding habitat is heath

based forests and woodlands where it shelters

under leaf litter and low vegetation, and hunts

for invertebrate prey either in shrubs or on the

ground.

LItoria

raniformis

Growling Grass

Frog

VU E1 # Negligible The study area is

considered unlikely to

provide suitable habitat

for this species, due to the

lack of suitable aquatic

waterbodies (i.e. swamps,

billabongs, floodplains or

inundated artificial

waterbodies) in the

vicinity.

In NSW the species was once distributed along

the Murray and Murrumbidgee Rivers and their

tributaries, the southern slopes of the Monaro

district and the central southern tablelands as

far north as Tarana, near Bathurst. Currently, the

species is known to exist only in isolated

populations in the Coleambally Irrigation Area,

the Lowbidgee floodplain and around Lake

Victoria. Usually found in or around permanent

or ephemeral Black Box/Lignum/Nitre

Goosefoot swamps, Lignum/Typha swamps and

Page 72: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 64

Scientific name Common name EPBC

Act

TSC Most

recent

record

Likelihoo

d of

impacts

Rationale for likelihood Habitat description

River Red Gum swamps or billabongs along

floodplains and river valleys. They are also found

in irrigated rice crops, particularly where there is

no available natural habitat.

Lophochroa

leadbeateri

Major Mitchell's

Cockatoo

V 1998 Low The study area is outside

of the normal range for

this species. In addition,

the study area does not

provide suitable habitat

(i.e. mallee-casuarina

woodland assemblages).

Found mainly in semi-arid and arid regions, in

dry woodlands, particularly mallee - casuarina

assemblages. They breed in the hollows of large

trees, often near watercourse.

Lophoictinia

isura

Square-tailed

Kite

V 2013 Low This species is considered

unlikely to utilize habitat in

the study area, due to the

limited prey abdundance

(i.e. passerine birds) and

highly urbanised nature of

the locality.

Typically inhabits coastal forested and wooded

lands of tropical and temperate Australia. In

NSW it is often associated with ridge and gully

forests dominated by Eucalyptus longifolia,

Corymbia maculata, E. elata, or E. smithii.

Individuals appear to occupy large hunting

ranges of more than 100 km2. They require

large living trees for breeding, particularly near

water with surrounding woodland /forest close

by for foraging habitat. Nest sites are generally

located along or near watercourses, in a tree

fork or on large horizontal limbs.

Miniopterus Eastern V 2012 Low This species may forage Occurs from Victoria to Queensland, on both

Page 73: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 65

Scientific name Common name EPBC

Act

TSC Most

recent

record

Likelihoo

d of

impacts

Rationale for likelihood Habitat description

schreibersii

oceanensis

Bentwing-bat within the study area on

occasion; however, the

study area does not

support key habitat

components (i.e. extensive

cliffs and caves).

sides of the Great Dividing Range. Forms large

maternity roosts (up to 100,000 individuals) in

caves and mines in spring and summer.

Individuals may fly several hundred km to their

wintering sites, where they roost in caves,

culverts, buildings, and bridges. They occur in a

broad range of habitats including rainforest, wet

and dry sclerophyll forest, paperbark forest and

open grasslands. Has a fast, direct flight and

forages for flying insects (particularly moths)

above the tree canopy and along waterways.

Mixophyes

balbus

Stuttering Frog VU E1 # Negligible This species is considered

unlikely to utilize habitat in

the study area, due to the

lack of suitable habitat in

the locality (i.e. rainforest

and wet forest).

Stuttering Frogs occur along the east coast of

Australia from southern Queensland to north-

eastern Victoria. Considered to have

disappeared from Victoria and to have

undergone considerable range contraction in

NSW, particularly in south-east NSW. Found in

rainforest and wet, tall open forest in the

foothills and escarpment on the eastern side of

the Great Dividing Range. Outside the breeding

season adults live in deep leaf litter and thick

understorey vegetation on the forest floor.

Monarcha

melanopsis

Black-faced

Monarch

M 2001 Low This species is considered

unlikely to utilize habitat in

the study area, due to the

A migratory species found during the breeding

season in damp gullies in temperate rainforests.

Disperses after breeding into more open

Page 74: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 66

Scientific name Common name EPBC

Act

TSC Most

recent

record

Likelihoo

d of

impacts

Rationale for likelihood Habitat description

lack of suitable habitat in

the locality (ie forested

and wooded

assemblages).

woodland.

Mormopterus

norfolkensis

Eastern Freetail-

bat

- V 2008 Medium The study area provides

potential foraging and

roosting habitat resources

for this species. Suitable

microbat roosting hollows

were observed in a

number of trees

surrounding the carpark,

including two Smooth-

barked Apple and one

Spotted Gum. The

removal of these trees has

the potential to impact

breeding resources for

this species in the locality,

if the species is using

these hollows.

Distribution extends east of the Great Dividing

Range from southern Queensland to south of

Sydney. Most records are from dry eucalypt

forests and woodland. Individuals tend to forage

in natural and artificial openings in forests,

although it has also been caught foraging low

over a rocky river within rainforest and wet

sclerophyll forest habitats. The species generally

roosts in hollow spouts of large mature

eucalypts (including paddock trees), although

individuals have been recorded roosting in the

roof of a hut, in wall cavities, and under metal

caps of telegraph poles. Foraging generally

occurs within a few km of roosting sites.

Myiagra

cyanoleuca

Satin Flycatcher M - 1994 Low The study area is

considered unlikely to

provide suitable habitat

for this species, due to the

Migratory species that occurs in coastal forests,

woodlands and scrubs during migration. Breeds

in heavily vegetated gullies.

Page 75: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 67

Scientific name Common name EPBC

Act

TSC Most

recent

record

Likelihoo

d of

impacts

Rationale for likelihood Habitat description

urbanised nature of the

locality and lack of

suitable habitat resources

for this species (ie intact

native vegetation).

Neophema

chrysogaster

Orange-bellied

Parrot

CR C1 # Negligible The study area is

considered unlikely to

provide suitable habitat

for this species, due to the

urbanised nature of the

locality and lack of

suitable habitat resources

for this species (i.e.

sheltered coastal marine

habitats).

The Orange-bellied Parrot breeds in the south-

west of Tasmania and migrates in autumn to

spend the winter on the mainland coast of

south-eastern South Australia and southern

Victoria. There are occasional reports from NSW,

and typical winter habitat is saltmarsh and

strandline/foredune vegetation communities

either on coastlines or coastal lagoons. The

species also inhabits small islands and

peninsulas and occasionally saltworks and golf

courses. Birds forage in low samphire herbland

or taller coastal shrubland.

Ninox strenua Powerful Owl V 2013 Low This species is considered

to have some potential to

forage in the study area

on occassion due to the

presence of habitat for

preferred prey species.

However, due to the

urbanised nature of the

The Powerful Owl occupies wet and dry eucalypt

forests and rainforests. It may inhabit both un-

logged and lightly logged forests as well as

undisturbed forests where it usually roosts on

the limbs of dense trees in gully areas. Large

mature trees with hollows at least 0.5 m deep

are required for nesting. Tree hollows are

particularly important for the Powerful Owl

Page 76: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 68

Scientific name Common name EPBC

Act

TSC Most

recent

record

Likelihoo

d of

impacts

Rationale for likelihood Habitat description

study area and availability

of better quality habitat in

the surrounding area (i.e.

Myles Dunphy Bushland

Reserve), it is considered

unlikely.

because a large proportion of the diet is made

up of hollow-dependent arboreal marsupials.

Nest trees for this species are usually emergent

with a diameter at breast height of at least 100

cm. It has a large home range of between 450

and 1450 ha.

Pachycephala

olivacea

Olive Whistler V Low The study area is

considered unlikely to

provide suitable habitat

for this species, due to the

urbanised nature of the

locality and lack of

suitable habitat resources

for this species (i.e. intact

native vegetation).

Found in a range of habitats including alpine

thickets, wetter rainforest/woodlands, riparian

vegetation and heaths.

Pandion

cristatus

Osprey M V 2013 Low This species may overfly

the study area on

occasion. However, due to

the urbanised nature of

the study area and lack of

suitable foraging or

breeding habitat, it is

considered unlikely.

Found in coastal waters, inlets, estuaries and

offshore islands. Occasionally found 100 km

inland along larger rivers. It is water-dependent,

hunting for fish in clear, open water. The Osprey

occurs in terrestrial wetlands, coastal lands and

offshore islands. It is a predominantly coastal

species, generally using marine cliffs as nesting

and roosting sites. Nests can also be made high

up in dead trees or in dead crowns of live trees,

usually within one km of the sea.

Page 77: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 69

Scientific name Common name EPBC

Act

TSC Most

recent

record

Likelihoo

d of

impacts

Rationale for likelihood Habitat description

Petrogale

penicillata

Brush-tailed

Rock-wallaby

VU E1 # Negligible The study area is

considered unlikely to

provide suitable habitat

for this species, due to the

urbanised nature of the

locality, and lack of

suitable habitat and

habitat resources (i.e.

rocky escarpments).

In NSW they occur from the Queensland border

in the north to the Shoalhaven in the south, with

the population in the Warrumbungle Ranges

being the western limit. Occupy rocky

escarpments, outcrops and cliffs with a

preference for complex structures with fissures,

caves and ledges, often facing north. Browse on

vegetation in and adjacent to rocky areas eating

grasses and forbs as well as the foliage and fruits

of shrubs and trees.

Phascolarctos

cinereus

Koala VU V, E2 1999 Low The study area is

considered unlikely to

provide suitable habitat

for this species, due to the

urbanised nature of the

locality, lack of

connectivity and lack of

suitable habitat resources

for this species (i.e.

preferred feed trees).

Pittwater LGA and Hawks nest: In NSW the Koala

mainly occurs on the central and north coasts

with some populations in the western region.

Koalas feed almost exclusively on eucalypt

foliage, and their preferences vary regionally.

Primary feed trees include Eucalyptus robusta, E.

tereticornis, E. punctata, E. haemostoma and E.

signata. They are solitary with varying home

ranges. In high quality habitat home ranges may

be 1-2 ha and overlap, while in semi-arid country

they are usually discrete and around 100 ha.

Plegadis

falcinellus

Glossy Ibis M Negligible The study area does not

support suitable habitat

resources for this species

in the study area (i.e.

Terrestrial wetlands, and occasionally wet

grasslands and sheltered marine habitats.

Forage in shallow water over soft substrate or on

grassy or muddy verges of wetlands, preferring

Page 78: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 70

Scientific name Common name EPBC

Act

TSC Most

recent

record

Likelihoo

d of

impacts

Rationale for likelihood Habitat description

wetlands). those providing variety of water depths; avoid

dry ground.

Potorous

tridactylus

tridactylus

Long-nosed

Potoroo (SE

mainland)

VU # Negligible This species is considered

unlikely to utilize habitat in

the study area due to the

highly disturbed and

urbanised nature of the

site and lack of suitable

habitat (i.e. dense

understorey, soil type),

and habitat resources (i.e.

suitable fungi).

In NSW it is generally restricted to coastal heaths

and forests east of the Great Dividing Range,

with an annual rainfall exceeding 760 mm.

Inhabits coastal heaths and dry and wet

sclerophyll forests. Dense understorey with

occasional open areas is an essential part of

habitat, and may consist of grass-trees, sedges,

ferns or heath, or of low shrubs of tea-trees or

melaleucas. A sandy loam soil is also a common

feature. The fruit-bodies of hypogeous

(underground-fruiting) fungi are a large

component of the diet of the Long-nosed

Potoroo. They also eat roots, tubers, insects and

their larvae and other soft-bodied animals in the

soil.

Pseudomys

novaehollandiae

New Holland

Mouse

VU - # Negligible This species is considered

unlikely to utilize habitat in

the study area due to the

highly disturbed and

urbanised nature of the

site and lack of suitable

habitat (ie heathland

understorey, vegetated

The New Holland Mouse has a fragmented

distribution across Tasmania, Victoria, New

South Wales and Queensland. Known to inhabit

open heathlands, woodlands and forests with a

heathland understorey and vegetated sand

dunes. It is a social animal, living predominantly

in burrows shared with other individuals.

Distribution is patchy in time and space, with

Page 79: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 71

Scientific name Common name EPBC

Act

TSC Most

recent

record

Likelihoo

d of

impacts

Rationale for likelihood Habitat description

sand dunes), and habitat

requirements (ie

association with fire).

peaks in abundance during early to mid stages

of vegetation succession typically induced by fire

Pseudophryne

australis

Red-crowned

Toadlet

- V 2005 Low The study area is

considered unlikely to

provide suitable habitat

for this species, due to the

urbanised nature of the

locality and lack of

suitable habitat resources

for this species (i.e.

shallow, ephemeral

drainage lines with

abundant leaf litter).

Occurs on wetter ridge tops and upper slopes of

sandstone formations on which the

predominant vegetation is dry open forests and

heaths. This species typically breeds within small

ephemeral creeks characterised by a series of

shallow pools that feed into larger semi-

perennial streams. Breeds all year round.

Pteropus

poliocephalus

Grey-headed

Flying-fox

VU V 2012 Low This species is considered

to have some potential to

forage within the study

area on occasion when

feed trees are flowering.

Myles Dunphy Reserve

supports a known

population of this species.

However, due to the

availability of better

quality habitat in the

Occurs along the NSW coast, extending further

inland in the north. This species is a canopy-

feeding frugivore and nectarivore of rainforests,

open forests, woodlands, melaleuca swamps

and banksia woodlands. Roosts in large colonies

(camps), commonly in dense riparian vegetation.

Bats commute daily to foraging areas, usually

within 15 km of the day roost although some

individuals may travel up to 70 km.

Page 80: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 72

Scientific name Common name EPBC

Act

TSC Most

recent

record

Likelihoo

d of

impacts

Rationale for likelihood Habitat description

surrounding area (i.e.

Myles Dunphy Bushland

Reserve), the removal of a

limited number of suitable

feed trees is unlikely to

significantly impact on this

species.

Ptilinopus

superbus

Superb Fruit-

Dove

V 1996 Negligible The study area is

considered unlikely to

provide suitable habitat

for this species, due to the

urbanised nature of the

locality and general lack of

suitable habitat for this

species in the study area

(i.e. rainforests and closed

forests).

The Superb Fruit Dove’s NSW distribution ranges

from northern NSW to as far south as Moruya. It

is found in rainforests, closed forests (including

mesophyll vine forests) and sometimes in

eucalypt and acacia woodlands where there are

fruit-bearing trees. It forages in the canopy of

fruiting trees such as figs and palms. Nests are

constructed high in the canopy throughout

September to January.

Rhipidura

rufifrons

Rufous Fantail M 2003 Low This species is considered

unlikely to utilize habitat in

the study area, due to the

lack of suitable habitat

resources in the locality

(i.e. dense undergrowth).

Migratory species that prefers dense, moist

undergrowth of tropical rainforests and scrubs.

During migration it can stray into gardens and

more open areas.

Page 81: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 73

Table 16: Additional threatened marine and shorebird species previously recorded within 5 km of the study area

Scientific name Common name EPBC Act TSC Act

Botaurus poiciloptilus Australasian Bittern EN E1

Calidris ferruginea Curlew Sandpiper M E1

Charadrius mongolus Lesser Sand-plover M V

Diomedea anitpodensis Antipodean Albatross V V

Diomedea dabbanena Tristan Albatross E -

Diomedea epomophora (sensu stricto) Southern Royal Albatross V -

Diomedea exulans (sensu lato) Wandering Albatross EN E1

Diomedea gibsoni Gibson's Albatross V V

Diomedea sanfordi Northern Royal Albatross E -

Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus Black-necked stork - E1

Haematopus longirostris Pied Oystercatcher - E1

Macronectes giganteus Southern Giant-Petrel EN E1

Macronectes halli Northern Giant-Petrel V V

Rostratula benghalensis (sensu lato) Painted Snipe EN E1

Thalassarche bulleri Buller's Albatross V -

Thalassarche cauta (sensu stricto) Shy Albatross V V

Thalassarche eremita Chatham Albatross E -

Thalassarche impavida Campbell Albatross V -

Thalassarche melanophris Black-browed Albatross V V

Page 82: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 74

Scientific name Common name EPBC Act TSC Act

Thalassarche salvini Salvin's Albatross V -

Thalassarche steadi White-capped Albatross V -

Page 83: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 75

A2.3 Migratory species (EPBC Act listed)

Includes records from the following sources:

Atlas of NSW Wildlife (refer to Section 2.1)

Department of Environment database (accessed on 6/01/2014)

BirdLife Australia data search

Current survey

Bold denotes species recorded in the study area during the current assessment.

Table 17: Migratory avifauna species recorded or predicted to occur within 5 km of the study area.

Scientific Name Common Name

Actitis hypoleucos Common Sandpiper

Apus pacificus Fork-tailed Swift

Ardea alba Great White Egret

Ardea ibis Cattle Egret

Ardea modesta Eastern Great Egret

Calidris acuminata Sharp-tailed Sandpiper

Calidris ruficollis Red-necked Stint

Gallinago hardwickii Latham's Snipe

Haliaeetus leucogaster White-bellied Sea-eagle

Hirundapus caudacutus White-throated Needletail

Hydroprogne caspia Caspian Tern

Limosa lapponica Bar-tailed Godwit

Merops ornatus Rainbow Bee-eater

Monarcha melanopsis Black-faced Monarch

Monarcha trivirgatus Spectacled Monarch

Myiagra cyanoleuca Satin Flycatcher

Numenius madagascariensis Eastern Curlew

Numenius phaeopus Whimbrel

Tringa brevipes Grey-tailed Tattler

Page 84: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 76

Appendix 3: Tree removal

Table 18: Details of trees to potentially affected

Tree

Number

Scientific name Common name Height

(m)

DBH

(m)

Likelihood of

removal

Hurstville/Kogarah LGA

preservation status

Comments

1 Corymbia maculata Spotted gum 12 0.5 Moderate Protected Retain if possible

2 Corymbia maculata Spotted gum 15 0.5 Moderate Protected Retain if possible

3 Corymbia maculata Spotted gum 15 0.5 Moderate Protected Retain if possible

4 Eucalyptus microcorys Tallowood 12 0.6 High Protected Retain if possible

5 Corymbia maculata Spotted gum 12 0.3 Moderate Protected Retain if possible

6 Corymbia maculata Spotted gum 15 0.6 High Protected Retain if possible

7 Callistemon viminalis Weeping

Bottlebrush

4 0.4 High Protected Low value

8 Angophora costata Sydney Red Gum 12 0.5 High Protected Tree hollow provides fauna

habitat

9 Schinus areira Pepper Tree 8 0.5 High Protected Low value

10 Angophora costata Sydney Red Gum 12 0.9 High Protected Retain if possible

11 Schinus areira Pepper Tree 8 0.6 Low Protected Low value

12 Schinus areira Pepper Tree 8 1 Low Protected Low value

13 Syagrus romanzoffiana Cocos Palm 7 0.4 High Protected Low value

14 Syagrus romanzoffiana Cocos Palm 7 0.4 High Protected Low value

15 Syagrus romanzoffiana Cocos Palm 7 0.4 High Protected Low value

Page 85: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 77

Tree

Number

Scientific name Common name Height

(m)

DBH

(m)

Likelihood of

removal

Hurstville/Kogarah LGA

preservation status

Comments

16 Syagrus romanzoffiana Cocos Palm 7 0.4 High Protected Low value

17 Schinus areira Pepper Tree 8 0.7 Low Protected Low value

18 Populus nigra Lombardy

Poplar

21 0.9 Moderate Not Protected Low value

19 Glochidion ferdinandi Cheese Tree 5 0.3 Moderate Protected Retain if possible

20 Glochidion ferdinandi Cheese Tree 10 0.8 High Protected Moderate value

21 Glochidion ferdinandi Cheese Tree 8 0.5 High Protected Moderate value

22 Cinnamomum camphora Camphor Laurel 6 0.3 High Protected Low value

23 Glochidion ferdinandi Cheese Tree 10 0.6 High Protected Moderate value

24 Glochidion ferdinandi Cheese Tree 8 0.5 High Protected Moderate value

25 Glochidion ferdinandi Cheese Tree 8 0.3 High Protected Moderate value

26 Cinnamomum camphora Camphor Laurel 12 0.8 High Protected Low value

27 Populus nigra Lombardy

Poplar

21 0.6 Moderate Not Protected Low value

28 Populus nigra Lombardy

Poplar

18 0.6 Moderate Not Protected Low value

29 Eucalyptus microcorys Tallowood 20 0.6 Moderate Protected Retain if possible

30 Eucalyptus microcorys Tallowood 16 0.6 Low Protected Retain if possible

31 Populus nigra Lombardy

Poplar

20 0.3 Moderate Not Protected Low value

32 Syncarpia glomulifera Turpentine 6 0.2 Moderate Protected Juvenile planted tree

Page 86: Oatley Station Accessibility Upgrade Flora and Fauna ... · TSC Act The study area is considered unlikely to provide potential habitat for any flora, fauna or ecological communities

© Biosis 2012 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting 78

Tree

Number

Scientific name Common name Height

(m)

DBH

(m)

Likelihood of

removal

Hurstville/Kogarah LGA

preservation status

Comments

33 Syncarpia glomulifera Turpentine 6 0.2 Moderate Protected Juvenile planted tree

34 Syncarpia glomulifera Turpentine 6 0.2 Moderate Protected Juvenile planted tree

35 Syncarpia glomulifera Turpentine 8 0.2 Moderate Protected Juvenile planted tree

36 Syncarpia glomulifera Turpentine 8 0.2 High Protected Juvenile planted tree

37 Syncarpia glomulifera Turpentine 8 0.2 High Protected Juvenile planted tree

38 Syncarpia glomulifera Turpentine 8 0.2 High Protected Juvenile planted tree

39 Syncarpia glomulifera Turpentine 7 0.2 High Protected Juvenile planted tree

40 Syncarpia glomulifera Turpentine 11 0.2 High Protected Juvenile planted tree

41 Syncarpia glomulifera Turpentine 9 0.2 High Protected Juvenile planted tree

42 Syncarpia glomulifera Turpentine 9 0.2 High Protected Juvenile planted tree

43 Syncarpia glomulifera Turpentine 11 0.2 Low Protected Juvenile planted tree

Tree height and DBH adapted from data provided to Biosis (DS&P, 2013).