o ] v p Á ] z h v Æ t Á d u v w o v ] µ ] } v · d } Á v ( } u í õ õ ï z } µ p z î ì í...

26
Dealing with Unexpected Wastewater Treatment Plant Disruptions February 16, 2017

Upload: others

Post on 16-Aug-2020

11 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: o ] v P Á ] Z h v Æ t Á d u v W o v ] µ ] } v · d } Á v ( } u í õ õ ï Z } µ P Z î ì í í Æ ] } } o ] } P Á µ ] ] v Á ] v l ] v P î ì ì ì l î ì ì í

Dealing with Unexpected Wastewater Treatment Plant

Disruptions

February 16, 2017

Page 2: o ] v P Á ] Z h v Æ t Á d u v W o v ] µ ] } v · d } Á v ( } u í õ õ ï Z } µ P Z î ì í í Æ ] } } o ] } P Á µ ] ] v Á ] v l ] v P î ì ì ì l î ì ì í

Location Map

Page 3: o ] v P Á ] Z h v Æ t Á d u v W o v ] µ ] } v · d } Á v ( } u í õ õ ï Z } µ P Z î ì í í Æ ] } } o ] } P Á µ ] ] v Á ] v l ] v P î ì ì ì l î ì ì í

WPCP History

• Original WPCP constructed on this site in 1928 consisting of primary treatment and chlorination;

• In 1958, pre-treatment of sewage began, with the installation of a bar screen and grit removal;

• Major expansion in 1967: secondary treatment established with the addition of aeration tanks an a secondary clarifier;

• Construction of the Orangeville Reservoir (now called Island Lake) began in 1968 and was completed in 1970 in order to provide flow augmentation during drought periods to ensure sufficient dilution of WPCP effluent;

• Major expansion in 1975: tertiary treatment established with the installation of a sand filter;

• Major expansion in 1985: addition of de-nitrification tanks, changing the process to pre-de-nitrification.

• Major expansion 2015 – 2018: increase plant capacity and significantly improve the monitoring and control capabilities.

Page 4: o ] v P Á ] Z h v Æ t Á d u v W o v ] µ ] } v · d } Á v ( } u í õ õ ï Z } µ P Z î ì í í Æ ] } } o ] } P Á µ ] ] v Á ] v l ] v P î ì ì ì l î ì ì í

WPCP Treatment Process

Influent Screening/ Raw Sewage Pumping

Aeration

Secondary Clarification

Disinfection

Filtration

Dechlorination

Denitrification

Grit Removal

Aeration

Secondary Clarification

Denitrification

Grit Removal

“Old Plant” “New Plant”

Flow Splitting Chamber

Sludge Thickening/ Anaerobic Digestion/

Sludge Storage

Credit River Outfall

Raw Sewage

Page 5: o ] v P Á ] Z h v Æ t Á d u v W o v ] µ ] } v · d } Á v ( } u í õ õ ï Z } µ P Z î ì í í Æ ] } } o ] } P Á µ ] ] v Á ] v l ] v P î ì ì ì l î ì ì í

Orangeville Water Pollution Control Plant

New Plant

Chlorination

Screening & Pumping

Old Plant

Tertiary Filtration

Biosolids Digestion & Storage

Page 6: o ] v P Á ] Z h v Æ t Á d u v W o v ] µ ] } v · d } Á v ( } u í õ õ ï Z } µ P Z î ì í í Æ ] } } o ] } P Á µ ] ] v Á ] v l ] v P î ì ì ì l î ì ì í

Planning for Abnormal Operating Events

• Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)– Bypass Events– Taking Process Equipment Out of Service– Process Disturbances

Page 7: o ] v P Á ] Z h v Æ t Á d u v W o v ] µ ] } v · d } Á v ( } u í õ õ ï Z } µ P Z î ì í í Æ ] } } o ] } P Á µ ] ] v Á ] v l ] v P î ì ì ì l î ì ì í

Planning for Abnormal Operating Events: Bypass

• Primary Bypass– Rarely occurs– Raw sewage flows exceed raw

sewage pump capacity– Entire treatment process is

bypassed for a portion of the raw sewage

– Raw sewage bypassing the treatment plant is chlorinated and dechlorinated

Page 8: o ] v P Á ] Z h v Æ t Á d u v W o v ] µ ] } v · d } Á v ( } u í õ õ ï Z } µ P Z î ì í í Æ ] } } o ] } P Á µ ] ] v Á ] v l ] v P î ì ì ì l î ì ì í

WPCP Treatment Process

Influent Screening/ Raw Sewage Pumping

Aeration

Secondary Clarification

Disinfection

Filtration

Dechlorination

Denitrification

Grit Removal

Aeration

Secondary Clarification

Denitrification

Grit Removal

Flow Splitting Chamber

Sludge Thickening/ Anaerobic Digestion/

Sludge Storage

Credit River Outfall

Raw Sewage

Disinfection

Dechlorination

Page 9: o ] v P Á ] Z h v Æ t Á d u v W o v ] µ ] } v · d } Á v ( } u í õ õ ï Z } µ P Z î ì í í Æ ] } } o ] } P Á µ ] ] v Á ] v l ] v P î ì ì ì l î ì ì í

Planning for Abnormal Operating Events: Bypass

• Partial Tertiary Bypass– Occasionally occurs– A portion of the wastewater flows

bypasses filtration– Preliminary treatment,

primary/secondary treatment, chlorination and dechlorinationstill occurs

Page 10: o ] v P Á ] Z h v Æ t Á d u v W o v ] µ ] } v · d } Á v ( } u í õ õ ï Z } µ P Z î ì í í Æ ] } } o ] } P Á µ ] ] v Á ] v l ] v P î ì ì ì l î ì ì í

WPCP Treatment Process

Influent Screening/ Raw Sewage Pumping

Aeration

Secondary Clarification

Disinfection

Filtration

Dechlorination

Denitrification

Grit Removal

Aeration

Secondary Clarification

Denitrification

Grit Removal

Flow Splitting Chamber

Sludge Thickening/ Anaerobic Digestion/

Sludge Storage

Credit River Outfall

Raw Sewage

Page 11: o ] v P Á ] Z h v Æ t Á d u v W o v ] µ ] } v · d } Á v ( } u í õ õ ï Z } µ P Z î ì í í Æ ] } } o ] } P Á µ ] ] v Á ] v l ] v P î ì ì ì l î ì ì í

Planning for Abnormal Operating Events: Bypass

• Following the implementation of emergency bypass procedures, WPCP Operators are required to notify:– Operations Centre Manager– Spills Action Centre– Credit Valley Conservation– Medical Officer of Health

WPCP

Town Hall

CVC

MOH

SAC

Page 12: o ] v P Á ] Z h v Æ t Á d u v W o v ] µ ] } v · d } Á v ( } u í õ õ ï Z } µ P Z î ì í í Æ ] } } o ] } P Á µ ] ] v Á ] v l ] v P î ì ì ì l î ì ì í

Planning for Abnormal Operating Events: Process Equipment Out of Service

• Usually a “planned” event• SOPs for Clarifiers• SOPs for Denitrification/Aeration Tanks• Informal agreement with CVC for advance

notification of planned shutdown; MOECC copied on notification

Page 13: o ] v P Á ] Z h v Æ t Á d u v W o v ] µ ] } v · d } Á v ( } u í õ õ ï Z } µ P Z î ì í í Æ ] } } o ] } P Á µ ] ] v Á ] v l ] v P î ì ì ì l î ì ì í

Planning for Abnormal Operating Events:

Process Disturbances

• Bulking sludge• Hydraulic overload• Digester Foaming• High solids build up in

filters• Toxic influent• Clarifier rake arm high

torque

• Chemical spill• Accidental chemical

mixing• Sludge spill at loading

area• Power failure• Clogged air lift in air grit

classifier

Page 14: o ] v P Á ] Z h v Æ t Á d u v W o v ] µ ] } v · d } Á v ( } u í õ õ ï Z } µ P Z î ì í í Æ ] } } o ] } P Á µ ] ] v Á ] v l ] v P î ì ì ì l î ì ì í

Case Study – Spring 2001

Background• OCWA operated the WPCP on behalf of the

Town from 1993 through 2011• Extra biosolids storage was required in

winter/spring 2000/2001– Early snowfall in Fall 2000 restricted end-of-

season land application– Few fields to spread biosolids in early spring

• Additional offsite storage was still insufficient

Page 15: o ] v P Á ] Z h v Æ t Á d u v W o v ] µ ] } v · d } Á v ( } u í õ õ ï Z } µ P Z î ì í í Æ ] } } o ] } P Á µ ] ] v Á ] v l ] v P î ì ì ì l î ì ì í

Case Study – Spring 2001

• A New Plant aeration cell converted into temporary storage for sludge

• Prevented solids from being discharged to Credit River

BUT• Remaining treatment capacity

overextended– Digesters/sludge storage tank

overflowed– Excessive odour from remaining

aeration cells (biological process upset)

Page 16: o ] v P Á ] Z h v Æ t Á d u v W o v ] µ ] } v · d } Á v ( } u í õ õ ï Z } µ P Z î ì í í Æ ] } } o ] } P Á µ ] ] v Á ] v l ] v P î ì ì ì l î ì ì í

Case Study – Spring 2001

Solution• Partially treated solids removed off-site for

final treatment– Digester could not handle increased solids– Arrangements made with Shelburne and Fergus

• Additional blower brought online to improve nitrification and allow biological process to recover

Page 17: o ] v P Á ] Z h v Æ t Á d u v W o v ] µ ] } v · d } Á v ( } u í õ õ ï Z } µ P Z î ì í í Æ ] } } o ] } P Á µ ] ] v Á ] v l ] v P î ì ì ì l î ì ì í

Case Study – Spring 2001

• Raw sewage samples indicated organics concentrations higher than the design capacity of the WPCP

– Investigate to determine source of high BOD loading

– Improve their manufacturing processes to reduce BOD in wastewater

– Enter into an overstrengthagreement

Page 18: o ] v P Á ] Z h v Æ t Á d u v W o v ] µ ] } v · d } Á v ( } u í õ õ ï Z } µ P Z î ì í í Æ ] } } o ] } P Á µ ] ] v Á ] v l ] v P î ì ì ì l î ì ì í

Case Study – Spring 2001

Going Forward• Improved communication between OCWA and Town

Staff• Increased sampling and testing frequency at the WPCP• Maintain a reliable source for additional blower(s) in

the event they are required in the future• Consider alternatives to land spreading, such as a

dewatering facility and/or portable dewatering equipment

• Establish a contingency plan to deal with such emergencies

Page 19: o ] v P Á ] Z h v Æ t Á d u v W o v ] µ ] } v · d } Á v ( } u í õ õ ï Z } µ P Z î ì í í Æ ] } } o ] } P Á µ ] ] v Á ] v l ] v P î ì ì ì l î ì ì í

Case Study –Spring/Summer 2016

Background

• Late April 2016: contractor accidently knocked concrete blocks into one of the New Plant Clarifiers.

• Procedure to take clarifier off line was implemented

• Early May 2016: Clarifier brought back on-line; sample results revealed high ammonia levels in the New Plant

Page 20: o ] v P Á ] Z h v Æ t Á d u v W o v ] µ ] } v · d } Á v ( } u í õ õ ï Z } µ P Z î ì í í Æ ] } } o ] } P Á µ ] ] v Á ] v l ] v P î ì ì ì l î ì ì í

Clarifier at WPCP

Page 21: o ] v P Á ] Z h v Æ t Á d u v W o v ] µ ] } v · d } Á v ( } u í õ õ ï Z } µ P Z î ì í í Æ ] } } o ] } P Á µ ] ] v Á ] v l ] v P î ì ì ì l î ì ì í

Case Study –Spring/Summer 2016

Solution:1. Run all New Plant blowers simultaneously;

2. Seed the New Plant with solids from the Old Plant; and

3. Daily sampling for ammonia and DO in all five aeration tanks.

• After peaking in mid-May, ammonia levels declined, but still high

• WPCP was out of compliance with the Environmental Compliance Approval for Ammonia for the month of May

• The MOECC were informed that the WPCP was out of compliance

Page 22: o ] v P Á ] Z h v Æ t Á d u v W o v ] µ ] } v · d } Á v ( } u í õ õ ï Z } µ P Z î ì í í Æ ] } } o ] } P Á µ ] ] v Á ] v l ] v P î ì ì ì l î ì ì í

• Elevated levels of ammonia, nitrogen and CBOD detected in May 25th samples from Credit River

• This information was immediately shared with CVC and MOECC staff

• Frequency of Credit River monitoring for 2016 increased to twice monthly

Case Study –Spring/Summer 2016

Page 23: o ] v P Á ] Z h v Æ t Á d u v W o v ] µ ] } v · d } Á v ( } u í õ õ ï Z } µ P Z î ì í í Æ ] } } o ] } P Á µ ] ] v Á ] v l ] v P î ì ì ì l î ì ì í

Case Study –Spring/Summer 2016

• Early June WPCP effluent results showed an increase in ammonia levels

• Outside treatment process consultants were contacted for their assistance

• Mid-June ammonia levels within compliance limits.

• Ammonia levels spiked again at the end of June, hovered around the compliance limit for much of July, and spiked again in late July and continued to remain high through mid-August

Page 24: o ] v P Á ] Z h v Æ t Á d u v W o v ] µ ] } v · d } Á v ( } u í õ õ ï Z } µ P Z î ì í í Æ ] } } o ] } P Á µ ] ] v Á ] v l ] v P î ì ì ì l î ì ì í

Case Study –Spring/Summer 2016

• Additional consultation with experts –recommended increasing aeration capacity

• August 10th: new blower brought on-line

• August 11th: ammonia levels dropped well below the compliance limit

• Ammonia levels have remained at these levels since that time

• CVC and MOECC staff were provided with weekly updates throughout this event

Page 25: o ] v P Á ] Z h v Æ t Á d u v W o v ] µ ] } v · d } Á v ( } u í õ õ ï Z } µ P Z î ì í í Æ ] } } o ] } P Á µ ] ] v Á ] v l ] v P î ì ì ì l î ì ì í

Case Study –Spring/Summer 2016

Going Forward• Standard Operating Procedure for taking a Clarifier

off-line to be revised to include the need to remove the solids from the bottom of the tank immediately

• Expanded WPCP will include significantly more aeration capacity and new aeration piping

• WPCP expansion includes significant improvements to our monitoring and control capabilities

Page 26: o ] v P Á ] Z h v Æ t Á d u v W o v ] µ ] } v · d } Á v ( } u í õ õ ï Z } µ P Z î ì í í Æ ] } } o ] } P Á µ ] ] v Á ] v l ] v P î ì ì ì l î ì ì í

Thank you!!