nwo context the case of the markermeer - ijmeer towards operationalisation 7 september bas waterhout...
TRANSCRIPT
NWO ContextThe case of the Markermeer - IJmeer
Towards operationalisation
7 September
Bas Waterhout – TU Delft
Contents
• Part 1 – Current situation • Part 2 – Brief history• Part 3 – Issues • Part 4 – Towards an operationalisation
Part 1 – Current situation
Source: RRAAM Brief 2009, p29
Source: RRAAM Brief 2009, p29
3 challenges:Green-Blue system
Source: RRAAM Brief 2009, p35
Source: RRAAM Brief 2009, p37
Source: RRAAM Brief 2009, p39
Source: RRAAM Brief 2009, p43-47
Five alternatives
Source: RRAAM Brief 2009, p55
July 2012:
Three alternatives for consultation
Source: RRAAM, July 2012, pp 27-30
July 2012
Indication of Optimised TBES – ‘Future Proof’ Ecological System
Land-water transition zones (large scale marsh lands)
Sheltered zone around Hoorn (silt control and clear water)
Optimal ground flows (sand extraction and nature development)
Synergies with dyke reinforcement
Fish passages and seasonal water levels
Source: RRAAM, July 2012, pp 32
Part 2 – A brief History 1960 - 2012
Source: RRAAM Brief 2009, p31
A brief history: how it all begun
1992 – IJburg 1: Referendum 1997
2004 – Verkenning IJmeer: some wise men...
2006 – Noordvleugel brief (Randstad Urgent)
2009 – Toekomstbeeld Markermeer-IJmeer2009 – RRAAM
2012 – Consultation report
2005 – Visie IJmeer
2010 – Werkmaatschappij Markermeer-IJmeer
2007 – Toekomst perspectief Markermeer-IJmeer
2004 – IJburg 2: Land use plan annulled
Part 3 - Issues
Central Regulation• Bird and Habitat Directives
– Markermeer – IJmeer Bird protection zone
• Water framework Directive– Clear water as from 2015
Source: Ecoshape projecthttp://www.ecoshape.nl/en_EN/project.html/environment/104-Delta+Lakes/project/133-MIJ+2.1+-+Project+summary
The Markermeer: A bathtub?
ANT: Autonomous Negative Trend
A deteriorating ecological system
SlobeendKrooneend
Aalscholvers
Geoorde Fuut
Kuifeend
Tafeleend
Fontijnkruid in Gooimeer by Huizen 2012, Source: Gooi & Eemlander 30 juli 2012: ‘Ecoblunder in Eemmeer’ http://www.gooieneemlander.nl/regionaal/eemland/article16951573.ece/Eco-blunder-in-Eemmeer?lref=sll
Kranswier
Driehoeksmossel
Werkmaatschappij Markermeer - IJmeer
RWS
DG Water
Min I&M
DG Ruimte DG
Natuur
Min ELI
National gov stakeholder
Zuiderzeeland – Water boards
StaatsbosbeheerANWB
Natuurmonumenten
Non-gov stakeholders
Provincie Flevoland
Provincie Noord Holland
Regional gov stakeholders
AlmereAmsterdam
Lelystad Waterland
Local gov stakeholders
EU: DG ENV
Other stakeholders:-Pressure groups-Recreation- private companies
Landsadvocaat
Parallel policy tracks
• Deltaprogramme – water safety• IJsselmeer Policy Report 2006• Natura 2000 Maintanance plan
Part 4 – Towards operationalisation
Early Observations• Central regulation, i.c. the Birds and Habitat directives, does not obstruct pro-active and
integrative area based solutions. At the regional level this path is followed and generates broad support.
• At the national level it seems more difficult to embark on an area-based pro-active and integrative approach, which is partly due to the financial consequences.
• Hypothesis: sectoral regulation leads to further institutionalising of sectoral organisationstructure at the national level.
• Meta-governance frameworks such as Randstad Urgent and RRAAM (which is part of
MIRT – another meta-governance framework) are quite productive in stimulating region cooperation, but less effective in terms of relating regional to national stakeholders. Design errors in the RRAAM and Randstad Urgent set of playing rules allow the national administration to sit aside and judge the efforts of the regional level, whereas effective meta-governance seems to rely on a condition of inclusiveness also of the meta-governor (Reff Petersen et al. 2010).
Research questions for the Markermeer – IJmeer case
1. How have the EU Birds and Habitat directive and the EU Water Framework Directive been transposed, implemented and enforced in the Netherlands and how has this affected the interpretation of this central regulation?
2. How has meta-governance influenced the process and contents of the Markermeer-IJmeer strategies and under what conditions can meta-governance contribute to relating central regulation to local interactive practices?
3. Are there mechanisms at the national level that cause central regulation to be interpreted, action and organisation which hamper area oriented policy making?
4. How is dealt with the uncertainty about how the ecological system operates in relation to jurisprudence and how does this affect policymaking?
5. How does the legal system, in particular access to the legal system, impact upon the policy process?
6. What is the origin of the parrallel policy tracks (natura 2000 beheerplan, IJsselmeergebied nota, Deltaprogramme, TMIJ) dealing with the same region and impacting upon each?