nw2013 retinaldetachment
DESCRIPTION
retinal detachment and surgeriesTRANSCRIPT
Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
Nawat Watanachai 2012
Little QUIZ (10min)
1. how to differentiate RRD/TRD/ERD from fundus findings?
2. risk of PVR 3. contraindication for pneumatic
retinopexy 4. compare PPV vs SBP for RRD 5. compare laser vs cryo retinopexy
Retinal Detachment: Definition separation of the inner layers of the
retina from the underlying retinal pigment epithelium (RPE, choroid)
RD: Pathophysiology
3 basic mechanisms: 1. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD)
2. Exudative retinal detachment (ERD)
3. Traction retinal detachments (TRD)
The Vitreous
Water 98-99% water 1-2%
collagen type II fibres* salts, sugars glycosaminoglycan, hyaluronic acid
very few cells mostly phagocytes hyalocytes of Balazs (surface/ hyaluronate)
refractive index of 1.336
The Vitreous *
Condense and attach more atOptic disc rimAlong blood vesselsMaculaPeripheral retinal abnormalities
○ Chorioretinal scar○ Lattice degeneration and others
Ora serrata (Vitreous base: 2mmA, 4mmP)
Vitreous degeneration/ syneresis
Posterior Vitreous Detachment
Posterior Vitreous detachment
Weiss ring
Posterior vitreous detachment Prevalence increase with
AXL age
○ < 10% at < 50 yrs○ 30% at 50-70 yrs ○ >60% at > 70 yrs
Other associateCataract Sx, within 2 yrs after surgery
○ ICCE 84% = ECCE c PC tear76% ○ ECCE c intact PC40%○ PE 30%
inflammation / uveitis trauma syndromes
Posterior vitreous detachment
Symptomsmost asymptomaticphotopsia
○ physical stimulate of vitreoretinal tractionfloaters
○ Weiss ring and V.condensation in the posterior hyaloid surface
○ vitreous opacity eg. blood , glia cell VH rupture of retinal vessel
Vitreo-retinal adhesion
-Chronic traction hyperpigmented area-Acute traction retinal break/ tear
Retinal Break/ tear
Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
- A hole, tear, or break in the neuronal layer
- allowing fluid from the vitreous cavity to seep in between and separate sensory and RPE layers
RB and PVD*
acute symptomatic PVD 15% retinal tear
PVD with VH 50-70 % retinal tear
PVD without VH 10-12 % retinal tear
Risks of RRD 1 *
Posterior vitreous detachment Peripheral retinal lesions
enclosed oral baysmeridional foldscystic retinal tuftlattice degeneration
Myopia Senile retinoschisis Cataract extraction Trauma
Risks of RRD 2 *
Intraocular inflammation/infection-Acute retinal necrosis syndrome
-Cytomegalovirus retinitis
-Ocular toxocariasis
-Ocular toxoplasmosis
-Pars planitis
Risks of RRD 3 *
Choiroid/ retinal coloboma Lens coloboma Stickler syndrome Goldmann-Favre syndrome Marfan syndrome Homocystinuria Ehlers-Danlos syndrome
Mortality/Morbidity*
1: 10,000 population : yr 15% of people with RD in one eye
develop RD in the other eye. (lifetime)
Risk of bilateral RD is increased (25-30%) in patients who have had bilateral cataract extraction.
History Floaters Flashing light (photopsia) Shadow in the peripheral visual field Decreased visual acuity and a wavy
distortion of objects (metamorphopsia)
History Detachments anterior to the equator are
very unlikely to affect the VF Detachment posterior to the equator can
be isolated with visual field testing, but many patients aware of a defect only when it involved the posterior pole and macula.
Photopsia and floaters not helpful in locating the position of the retinal tear or detachment
visual field defect very specific for locating the detachment.
History
FHx of RRD History of trauma previous surgery
cataract extraction/ esp c cpx (-L-’)intraocular foreign body removalretinal procedures
Physical examination VA/ VF IOP : hypotony of >4-5 mm Hg less than
the fellow eye is common Vitreous
tobacco dust (Shafer’s sign), pathognomonic for a retinal tear in 70% of cases with no previous eye disease or surgery.
Physical examination
Indirect ophthalmoscopy with scleral depression
A 3-mirror contact lens examination with a slit-lamp
marked elevation of the retina, which appears gray with dark blood vessels that may lie in folds.
Physical examination
Retinal detachment
Which one is this case?1. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD)
2. Exudative retinal detachment (ERD)
3. Traction retinal detachments (TRD)
Is this RRD/ TRD or ERD *
symptoms RRD TRD ERD
floaters ++ +/- +/-
flashing ++ - -
Progression of VA
loss
acute chronic Subacute/ chronic
Fluctuation of vision
- +/- +
Is this RRD/ TRD or ERD *
signs RRD TRD ERD
Shaffer’s sign
+ - -
PVD ++ - +/-
VH +/- +/- -
RD contour convex concave bullous
RD surface corrugate Ridge/ wavy smooth
shifting +/- - ++
associated Myopia/ trauma/ Sx
DM CTD
Workup for diagnosis Lab study – unhelpful Imaging – not necessary in most cases
Poor visualization B-scanWeird cases
○ IOFB/parasite
CLINICAL FEATURES
Early Long standing
CLINICAL FEATURES:early
Earlyretina lost transparency and assumes a
gray, translucent appearancefine, irregular corrugations usually present
○ result of intraretinal edema
Recent rhegmatogenous retinal detachment showing loss of the normal retinal transparency and irregular corrugations
CLINICAL FEATURES : early
fine details of the choroidal vasculature obscured by overlying detached retina
within days of RRDouter retinal degeneration starts to occurphotoreceptor damage related to height and
duration circulation of inner retina not affected
CLINICAL FEATURES : early
If retina reattached within a weekmost of cellular changes reversible
RPE cells underlying RRD released into SRF and may pass through RB into vitreous cavitytobacco dust 70% of case
CLINICAL FEATURES :early
Lincoff and Geiser reported 4 guidelines for locating RB causing RRD *determined by
○ location of causative break○ anatomic barriers (optic n.,ora serrata,
existing chorioretinal adhesions)○ effect gravity on SRF in upright
position
Note : only for fresh RD with 1 RB
ป๋�า harvey lincoff ณ NEI
Lincoff rule
total or superior RD that cross midlineprimary hole usually
within 1 clock hr. of 12-o'clock meridian
If detachment extends more inferiorly on either nasal or temporal sideRB usually on same
side of 12-o'clock meridian
Lincoff rule
superotemporal RDRB lies near superior edge of detached retina
superior nasal or temporal RDRB lies within 1.5 clock hr. of the highest border 98%
Lincoff rule
inferior RDhigher side indicates
which side of the disc an inferior hole lies 95% of the time
inferior detachment is bullousprimary hole lies
above horizontal meridian
CLINICAL FEATURES:long standing
LONG-STANDINGprogressive atrophy of all retinal layers smooth contour and semitransparentsome cases, cystic spaces atrophy and depigmentation of underlying
RPE
CLINICAL FEATURES :LONG-STANDING
RRD ≥ 3 mo.RPE metaplasia at border of detachment
Most RRD surrounded by demarcation line eventually progress; nonetheless, surgical repair of these eyes has an excellent prognosis
CLINICAL FEATURES :LONG-STANDING RRD > 6 mo.
Subretinal fibrosis
CLINICAL FEATURES :LONG-STANDING
RRD > 1 yearintraretinal cystcan resolve if retinal reattach
CLINICAL FEATURES :LONG-STANDING
very long-standing extensive capillary nonperfusion lead to
peripheral retinal NVIOP can rise
○ TM impeded by pigment clumps or the outer segments of photoreceptors
PROLIFERATIVE
VITREORETINOPATHY
occurs ~ 10% of all RRD which ¼ require additional surgical intervention
most common cause of failure to repair risk factor
aphakia , preop PVR , extensive RD , uveitis , excessive cryo, GRT, massive VH
ClassificationRD with vitreoretinopathy1983*
GradeGrade NameName SignsSigns
AA MinimalMinimal vitreous haze ,pigment clumpvitreous haze ,pigment clump
BB ModerateModerate wrinkling inner retinal surface,roll edge RB , wrinkling inner retinal surface,roll edge RB , retinal stiffness , vessel tortous retinal stiffness , vessel tortous
CC MarkedMarked full thickness fix retinal fold full thickness fix retinal fold
C1,C2,C3C1,C2,C3
DD Massive Massive full thickness fix retinal fold 4 quadrants full thickness fix retinal fold 4 quadrants D1 wide ,D2 narrow D1 wide ,D2 narrow D3 close not seen optic disc D3 close not seen optic disc
Classification of PVR 1991*
gradegrade featuresfeatures
AA vitreous haze ,pigment clump,pigment cluster inferior vitreous haze ,pigment clump,pigment cluster inferior retinaretina
BB wrinkling inner retinal surface,roll and irregular edge RB , wrinkling inner retinal surface,roll and irregular edge RB , retinal stiffness , vessel tortous ,retinal stiffness , vessel tortous ,vitreous mobility , vitreous mobility ,
CP1-12CP1-12 posterior to equator : focal , diffuse ,or circumferential full posterior to equator : focal , diffuse ,or circumferential full thickness fold , subretinal strandsthickness fold , subretinal strands
CA1-12CA1-12 anterior to equator : focal ,diffuse ,or circumferential full anterior to equator : focal ,diffuse ,or circumferential full thickness fold , subretinal strandsthickness fold , subretinal strands
Management RRD Retinal repositioning
Push the retina-eyewall○ Pneumatic retinopexy○ Scleral buckle procedure○ vitrectomy
Remove SRF/ perfluorocarbon liquidRemove fibrous membrane/traction
Seal the break(s)CryoretinopexyLaser retinopexy
Temponade the retinaGas/ silicone oil
Retinal Repositioning
○Pneumatic retinopexy○Scleral buckle procedure
Scleral balloon
○vitrectomy
Pneumatic retinopexy *
intravitreal gas tamponade RB temporary100%C3F8 4X at 72 hrs
SRF will resolve Need laser / cryo to permanently close the
RB
Pneumatic retinopexy*
ContraindicationsBreak > 1 clock hr Break inferior 4 clock hrPVR grade C,DCloudy ocular mediaUncontrolled or severe glaucomaCan’t maintain position
Pneumatic retinopexy
Relative contraindicationsExtensive lattice degenerationAphakia or pseudophakia
Results PR
50-80% reattach with single PR 60-98% reattach with reoperation
Scleral buckle
Indent sclera with solid silicone Segmental versus Encircling Buckles
Scleral buckle : Segmental *
usually reserved for RRD < 1 clock hourposterior breaks
primary advantage easy of placementminimal refractive error changeavoid effects of large encircling elements
however, for most large posterior breaks , all MH prefer closure with gas and vitrectomy
Scleral buckle : Segmental
not provide retinal support elsewhere vitreoretinal traction away from
segmental element not supported, which may result in formation of new RB
because of limited support , some surgeon prefer encircling when possible
Scleral buckle :encircling
particularly indicated in *multiple breaks in different quadrantsAphakia/ pseudophakiaHigh/pathologic myopiadiffuse vitreoretinal pathologic eg. extensive
lattice degeneration or vitreoretinal degenerations
PVR ≥ grade B
Scleral buckle
Intraoperative complicationsCorneal clouding
○ epithelial edema from IOP risingMiosis
○ hypotony , inflammationScleral perforateDrainage complications
○ retinal incarcerate/perforate○ choroidal hemorrhage
Scleral buckle
Post-op complicationsGlaucomaAnterior segment ischemiaInfection/extrusionCD
○ vortex vein obstrution○ drainage procedure
CME
Scleral buckle Post-op complications
Macular puckerMotility disturbanceChange refractive error
○ greater in phakic eye○ Myopic or hyperopic?
ERD○ cause unknown
Scleral buckle
macula off VA ≥ 20/50 ~ 40-60% duration of macula detachment relate
with final VA VA ≥ 20/40 71% if detach < 10 daysVA ≥ 20/40 27% if detach 11days-6 weeksVA ≥ 20/40 14% if detach > 6 weeks
Temporary balloon
Lincoff’s balloon external device indent
sclera to allow cryotherapy or laser induce choriorertinal adhesion
especial useful ininferior RD when PR not
possible
Vitrectomy
Remove vitreousRemove vitreoretinal traction on RB
FAX Injection of gas or liquid silicone Avoid complication from SB Complete tamponade of vitreous cavity
Vitrectomy
Advantagesbetter intraoperative control in difficult
situationimprove visualization of peripheral breakInternal drainage avoid complication of
external drainage
Vitrectomy
Advantageshigh intraoperative reattach rateremove of vitreous opacityremove capsular opacityinternal photocoagulation / cryotherapy RBdrainage suprachoroidal fluid if present
Vitrectomy
Advantagesless post-op change refractive errorlower incidence of post-op double visionlower incidence of ERDavoid hazard of scleral perferation
Vitrectomy
Disadvantagesdelay visual restitution from gas tamponadeposition after operationair travel avoid
Vitrectomy
Disadvantageshigher rate of cataract in phakic eyehigher rate of iatrogenic breakhigher rate of post-op IOP risinghigher rate of post-op new/miss breakspecial equipmenthigher cost
Vitrectomy
Results Anatomical reattach 64-100% Functional results
VA ≥ 20/50 63%Compare with SB VA ≥ 20/50 39-56%
Seal the break(s)
Diathermy (obsolete) Laser cryo
Laser photocoagulation
usually cannot seal RB if presence SRF may be use to create barrier to prevent
progression of RD esp. useful in
chronic inferior RDsystemic illness contraindicate to surgery
Laser photocoagulation
slit-lamp biomicroscope with contact lens
laser indirect ophthalmoscope (LIO)
endolaser
Laser photocoagulation*
Slit-lampbetter magnified Safer in inexpertise
operatorLess need of corneal
care during laserLess pain
LIOsignificant cataracts,
PCO, mild VH more easily treated with LIO
indentationNeed more skillnot be readily
available Any patient position
A.posteriorly located retinal tear B.treat by laser photocoagulation
Laser photocoagulation *
Compared with diathermy and cryopexyless breakdown of blood–ocular barrierthermal effect confined predominantly to
retina and pigment epitheliumlittle or no effect on choroid or sclerainduces adhesive effect between retina &
pigment epithelium within 24hr
Cryoretinopexy
RD with very shallow fluid can be cure by cryoretinopexy alone
using cryoprobe and indirect ophthalmoscope testing cryoprobe prior to make sure probe is
freezing
Cryoretinopexy
freezing or whitening of RPE will noticed first, followed by delineation of edges of retinal tear and whitening of retina
excessive freezing or ice crystal formation should be avoided
Cryoretinopexy
histologic response depends on whether RPE alone or RPE and overlying detached retina together are frozenonly RPE froze once retina reattached
○ pigment epithelial hyperplasia ○ loss of retinal outer segments ○ normal microvillous interdigitations seen between
retina and RPE are missing
Cryoretinopexy
If both RPE and overlying retina frozencellular connections between retina and RPE
consisting of desmosome formation between retinal glia and pigment epithelium or direct contact between retinal glia and Bruch's membrane
Cryoretinopexy
Disadvantage dispersion of pigment epithelial cells, which can
result in subretinal pigmentary changes after reattachment
dispersion of viable pigment epithelial cells capable of causing PVR following cryopexy
Cryoretinopexy
Some study suggest cryopexy is risk factor of post-op PVR whereas others not show an associationminimize cryotherapy-induced pigment epithelial cell
dispersion by ○ not over treating ○ avoiding unnecessary scleral depression of treated
areas localization and examination with scleral
depression should be performed before cryopexy
Cryoretinopexy : disadvantage
induce choroidal congestion &hyperemia although not permanentmay complicate drainage of SRF through
treated areas
breakdown of BRBcause post-op CME and ERD