nutrition: concepts & controversies

1
New Resources for Nutrition Educators BOOK Nutrition: Concepts & Contro- versies. Sizer F, Whitney E. 2011. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, PO Box 6904, Florence, KY 410226904. Pa- perback book, 848 pp, $121, ISBN: 978-0-538-73494-3. This resource has a number of valuable tools for catching student interest and leading the reader through rather complex nutrition issues to a more complete un- derstanding of nutrition science. The text has been updated and reorganized, and new features have been added since the last edition. New features include Concept Links in the margins, which direct readers to earlier discussions relating to topics at hand, and Concepts in Action activities, which integrate chapter concepts with the Diet Analysis Plus program. Food Feature sections, practical appli- cations of the chapter concepts that help the reader choose food according to sound nutrition principles, were continued in this edition. The Controversies section remains, and new controversies have been included that delve into emerging issues. This edition references the 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Ameri- cans and does not include the 2010 version, nor does it reference the latest edition of Healthy People 2020. It uses the Healthy People goals, but not the most recent ones. The fact that nei- ther of these documents was updated in the text is a serious issue given that they were just revised. This edition is clear and colorful with lively gures and a logical, infor- mal style of presentation. One of the goals is to have the reader develop a bet- ter sense of how to nourish his or her body. Food Feature sections, which ap- pear in most chapters, do help make the practical connection between the- ory and practice; however, the food items for the model meals sometimes led to high daily sodium totals. It should be noted that an error was found in a gure in Chapter 2, in which a nutrient-dense sample menu is compared with a convenience sam- ple menu. Selected nutrients are com- pared, whereas sodium is not. Given the 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Amer- icans recommendations on sodium, the sample meals could have been lower in sodium. The reader who does not know better might assume that the suggested model meals should become his or her choices. In addition, Figure 2-14 incorrectly lists ½ cup of green beans as equal to 1 cup of vegetables. The authors mention the effects of the DASH (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension) diet on reducing blood pressure. They discuss that the diet often achieves a lower blood pres- sure than restriction of sodium intake alone. They fail to mention the fact that the lower-sodium version of the DASH diet achieves the lowest blood pressure. Therefore, that version is the one that should be used to achieve the best results. This 12th edition has much infor- mation to offer. However, it is not as timely and relevant as it should be, has a few errors, and, in places, the discussions are not as deep as they should be. Jacquelyn W. McClelland, PhD, Pro- fessor, Department Extension Leader, and Nutrition Specialist, Department of 4H Youth Development and Family & Con- sumer Sciences, Campus Box 7606, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7606 doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2011.05.014 Cite this article as McClelland JW. Nutrition: Concepts & Controver- sies. [New Resources for Nutrition Educators]. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2011;43:424.e5. Inclusion of any material in this section does not imply endorsement by the Society for Nutrition Education. Evaluative comments contained in the reviews reflect the views of the authors. Review abstracts are either prepared by the reviewer or extracted from the product literature. Prices quoted are those provided by the publishers at the time materials were submitted. They may not be current when the review is published. Reviewers receive a complimentary copy of the resource as part of the review process. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2011;43:424.e5 Ó2011 SOCIETY FOR NUTRITION EDUCATION Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior Volume 43, Number 5, 2011 424.e5

Upload: jacquelyn-w-mcclelland

Post on 05-Sep-2016

223 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Nutrition: Concepts & Controversies

New Resources for Nutrition Educators

BOOK

Nutrition: Concepts & Contro-versies. Sizer F, Whitney E. 2011.Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, PO Box6904, Florence, KY 41022–6904. Pa-perback book, 848 pp, $121, ISBN:978-0-538-73494-3.

This resource has a number of valuabletools for catching student interest andleading the reader through rather complexnutrition issues to a more complete un-derstanding of nutrition science. Thetext has been updated and reorganized,and new features have been added sincethe last edition.

New features include Concept Linksin themargins, which direct readers toearlier discussions relating to topics athand, and Concepts in Action activities,which integrate chapter conceptswith the Diet Analysis Plus program.Food Feature sections, practical appli-cations of the chapter concepts thathelp the reader choose food accordingto sound nutrition principles, werecontinued in this edition.

The Controversies section remains,and new controversies have beenincluded that delve into emergingissues. This edition references the2005 Dietary Guidelines for Ameri-cans and does not include the 2010version, nor does it reference the latestedition of Healthy People 2020. It usesthe Healthy People goals, but not themost recent ones. The fact that nei-ther of these documents was updatedin the text is a serious issue giventhat they were just revised.

Inclusion of any material in this section does notNutrition Education. Evaluative comments contauthors. Review abstracts are either prepared byliterature. Prices quoted are those provided by tsubmitted. They may not be current when the ra complimentary copy of the resource as part ofJ Nutr Educ Behav. 2011;43:424.e5�2011 SOCIETY FOR NUTRITION EDUC

Journal of Nutrition Education and Behav

This edition is clear and colorfulwith lively figures and a logical, infor-mal style of presentation. One of thegoals is tohave the readerdevelop abet-ter sense of how to nourish his or herbody. Food Feature sections, which ap-pear in most chapters, do help makethe practical connection between the-ory and practice; however, the fooditems for the model meals sometimesled to high daily sodium totals.

It should be noted that an error wasfound in a figure in Chapter 2, inwhich a nutrient-dense sample menuis compared with a convenience sam-ple menu. Selected nutrients are com-pared, whereas sodium is not. Giventhe 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Amer-icans recommendations on sodium,the sample meals could have beenlower in sodium. The reader who

imply endorsement by the Society forained in the reviews reflect the views of thethe reviewer or extracted from the producthe publishers at the time materials wereeview is published. Reviewers receivethe review process.

ATION

ior � Volume 43, Number 5, 2011

does not know better might assumethat the suggested model mealsshould become his or her choices. Inaddition, Figure 2-14 incorrectly lists½ cup of green beans as equal to 1cup of vegetables.

The authors mention the effects ofthe DASH (Dietary Approaches toStop Hypertension) diet on reducingblood pressure. They discuss that thediet often achieves a lower blood pres-sure than restriction of sodium intakealone. They fail to mention the factthat the lower-sodium version of theDASH diet achieves the lowest bloodpressure. Therefore, that version isthe one that should be used to achievethe best results.

This 12th edition has much infor-mation to offer. However, it is not astimely and relevant as it should be,has a few errors, and, in places, thediscussions are not as deep as theyshould be.

Jacquelyn W. McClelland, PhD, Pro-fessor, Department Extension Leader, andNutrition Specialist, Department of 4HYouth Development and Family & Con-sumer Sciences, Campus Box 7606,North Carolina State University, Raleigh,NC 27695-7606

doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2011.05.014

Cite this article as McClelland JW.Nutrition: Concepts & Controver-sies. [New Resources for NutritionEducators]. J Nutr Educ Behav.2011;43:424.e5.

424.e5