numerical study of slip effects on unsteady aysmmetric porous...
TRANSCRIPT
N u m e ric al s t u dy of slip effec t s on u n s t e a dy ays m m e t ric
bioconvec tive n a nofluid flow in a po ro u s mic roc h a n n el wi th a n exp a n din g/ con t r a c ting u p p e r
w all u sin g Buon gio r no’s m o d elBe g, OA, Basir, M F M, U d din, MJ a n d Ism ail, AIM
h t t p://dx.doi.o r g/10.1 1 4 2/S 0 2 1 9 5 1 9 4 1 7 5 0 0 5 9 2
Tit l e N u m e ric al s t u dy of slip effec t s on u n s t e a dy ays m m e t ric bioconvec tive n a nofluid flow in a po rou s mic roc h a n n el wi th a n exp a n ding/ con t r ac tin g u p p e r w all u sing Buon gio rno’s m o d el
Aut h or s Beg, OA, Basir, M F M, U d din, MJ a n d Is m ail, AIM
Typ e Article
U RL This ve r sion is available a t : h t t p://usir.s alfor d. ac.uk/id/e p rin t/40 1 0 0/
P u bl i s h e d D a t e 2 0 1 6
U SIR is a digi t al collec tion of t h e r e s e a r c h ou t p u t of t h e U nive r si ty of S alford. Whe r e copyrigh t p e r mi t s, full t ex t m a t e ri al h eld in t h e r e posi to ry is m a d e fre ely availabl e online a n d c a n b e r e a d , dow nloa d e d a n d copied for no n-co m m e rcial p riva t e s t u dy o r r e s e a r c h p u r pos e s . Ple a s e c h e ck t h e m a n u sc rip t for a ny fu r t h e r copyrig h t r e s t ric tions.
For m o r e info r m a tion, including ou r policy a n d s u b mission p roc e d u r e , ple a s e
con t ac t t h e Re posi to ry Tea m a t : u si r@s alford. ac.uk .
1
JOURNAL OF MECHANICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
ARTICLE ID - JMMB-D-16-00106
Print ISSN: 0219-5194 Online ISSN: 1793-6810
IMPACT FACTOR = 0.797 PUBLISHER: WORLD SCIENTIFIC (SINGAPORE)
Accepted September 7th
2016
NUMERICAL STUDY OF SLIP EFFECTS ON UNSTEADY AYSMMETRIC
BIOCONVECTIVE NANOFLUID FLOW IN A POROUS MICROCHANNEL WITH AN
EXPANDING/ CONTRACTING UPPER WALL USING BUONGIORNO’S MODEL
O. Anwar Bég1*
, Md. Faisal Md Basir2*
, M.J. Uddin3 and A. I. Md. Ismail
2
1 Fluid Mechanics, Biomechanics and Propulsion, Aeronautical and Mechanical Engineering
Division, Room UG17, Newton Building, University of Salford, M54WT, UK. 2
School of Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia,11800, Penang, Malaysia. 3American International University-Bangladesh, Banani, Dhaka 1213, Bangladesh.
*Corresponding author: Email:[email protected]; [email protected]
ABSTRACT
In this paper, the unsteady fully developed forced convective flow of viscous incompressible
biofluid that contains both nanoparticles and gyrotactic microorganisms in a horizontal
micro-channel is studied. Buongiorno’s model is employed. The upper channel wall is either
expanding or contracting and permeable and the lower wall is static and impermeable. The
plate separation is therefore a function of time. Velocity, temperature, nano-particle species
(mass) and motile micro-organism slip effects are taken into account at the upper wall. By
using the appropriate similarity transformation for the velocity, temperature, nanoparticle
volume fraction and motile microorganism density, the governing partial differential
conservation equations are reduced to a set of similarity ordinary differential equations.
These equations under prescribed boundary conditions are solved numerically using the
Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg fourth-fifth order numerical quadrature in the MAPLE symbolic
software. Excellent agreement between the present computations and solutions available in
the literature (for special cases) is achieved. The key thermofluid parameters emerging are
identified as Reynolds number, wall expansion ratio, Prandtl number, Brownian motion
parameter, thermophoresis parameter, Lewis number, bioconvection Lewis number and
bioconvection Péclet number. The influence of all these parameters on flow velocity,
temperature, nano-particle volume fraction (concentration) and motile micro-organism
density function is elaborated. Furthermore graphical solutions are included for skin friction,
wall heat transfer rate, nano-particle mass transfer rate and micro-organism transfer rate.
Increasing expansion ratio is observed to enhance temperatures and motile micro-organism
density. Both nanoparticle volume fraction and microorganism increases with an increase in
momentum slip. The dimensionless temperature and microorganism increases as wall
expansion increases. Applications of the study arise in advanced nanomechanical
bioconvection energy conversion devices, bio-nano-coolant deployment systems etc.
Keywords: Multiple slip, bioconvection, nanofluids, unsteady flow; micro-channel; porous
wall; gyrotactic microorganisms; expanding/contracting upper wall; numerical.
2
NOMENCLATURE
a
length of channel m
a
time-dependent rate m
s
1a
velocity slip parameter,1
1
Sa
a
A
injection coefficient m
s
b
chemotaxis constant m
1b
thermal slip parameter,1
1
Db
a
C nano-particles volume fraction
0C reference nano-particle volume fraction
1C nano-particle volume fraction on lower wall
2C nano-particle volume fraction on lower wall
1c
mass slip parameter,1
1
Ec
a
pc specific heat at constant pressure J
kgK
BD Brownian diffusion coefficient
2m
s
nD variable micro-organism diffusion coefficient
2m
s
TD thermophoretic diffusion coefficient
2m
s
1D thermal slip factor m
1d
micro-organism slip parameter,1
1
Fd
a
1E mass slip factor m
1F micro-organism slip factor m
( )f dimensionless stream function
3
j vector flux of micro-organisms 2
kg
m s
k thermal conductivity W
mK
Nb Brownian motion parameter 2 0
0
( )BD C C
Nb
Nt thermophoresis parameter 2 0
0 0
( )TD T T
NtT
N number of motile micro-organisms
1N lower wall motile micro-organisms
2N upper wall motile micro-organisms
p pressure 2
( )Newton
m
Pe bioconvection Péclet number ( )c
n
bWPe
D
Pr Prandtl number 0
Pr ( )
Re Reynolds number wav
\
1S velocity slip factor s
m
Lb bioconvection Lewis number 0 ( )n
SbD
Le Lewis number 0 ( )B
LeD
t dimensional time ( )s
T nanofluid temperature ( )K
0T reference temperature ( )K
1T temperature on lower wall ( )K
2T temperature on upper wall ( )K
u velocity components along the x axis m
s
v velocity vector m
s
v
average swimming velocity vector of micro-organism 2m
s
4
v velocity components along the y axis m
s
wv dimensional inflow/outflow velocity m
s
cW maximum cell swimming speed m
s
x dimensional coordinate along the surface m
y coordinate normal to the surface m
Greek letters
0 effective thermal diffusivity
2m
s
wall expansion ratio aa
independent similarity variable
( ) dimensionless temperature
1 constant
kinematic viscosity
2m
s
fluid density 3
kg
m
f
c volumetric heat capacity of the fluid 3
J
m K
p
c volumetric heat capacity of the nanoparticle material 3
J
m K
ratio of the effective heat capacity of the nanoparticle material to the fluid heat
capacity ( )
( )
p
f
c
c
( ) dimensionless nanoparticles volume fraction
1 constant
( ) dimensionless number of motile micro-organisms
1 constant
Subscripts
( ) ' ordinary differentiation with respect to
5
0( ) condition at reference
1( ) condition at lower wall
2( ) condition at upper wall
1. INTRODUCTION
The recent progress in scaling down devices in medical engineering requires a more
elegant and refined understanding of fluid dynamic, heat and mass transfer phenomena at
small scales. Responding to this demand, numerous scientists and engineers are actively
studying methods for enhancing heat, mass and momentum transfer strategies at the micro-
dimension scale. Usually channels with hydraulic diameter below 1 mm are categorized as
micro-channels. They arise in diverse areas of health technology including efficient micro-
sized cooling systems for biomedical processing systems, bio-electronic devices, lab-on-a-
chip biological designs, bio-astronautics, cell sorting, immunoassays, DNA sampling etc [1].
One aspect distinguishing micro/nanoscale gas flows from their macroscale counterparts is
that the wall slip effect usually becomes so vital at micro/nanoscales that its negligence may
lead to predictions deviating unacceptably from physical reality. Employing the Navier–
Stokes equations in conjunction with adequate slip velocity boundary conditions that properly
incorporate gas molecule and wall interaction kinetics, has been demonstrated to be a robust
methodology for providing accurate results for micro/nanoscale gas flows as described by
Wu [2]. Numerous studies have revealed the important influence of slip on near-wall flow
characteristics.
The internal flow through a porous channel with extending/contracting walls has
some important applications in biophysical flows such as blood flow and artificial dialysis,
air and blood circulation in the respiratory system. Further applications include filtration in
tissue, oxygen diffusion in capillaries, cosmetics materials manufacture, the mechanics of the
cochlea in the human ear, pulsating diaphragms and cerebral hydrodynamics [3, 4]. A
significant number of investigations have been communicated recently on internal fluid
dynamics of porous channels under different wall conditions and for various transport
phenomena. Adesanya [5] examined natural convective flow of heat generating fluid through
a permeable channel with anisotropic slip. A seminal early analysis was presented by Uchida
and Aoki [6] concerning viscous flow through a tube with a contracting cross section. Later
Bujurke [7] further considered the Uchida-Aoki model both analytically with series
expansions and numerically. Goto and Uchida [8] presented an unsteady laminar flow model
for incompressible fluid through a permeable pipe. Other recent studies focused on fluid
6
mechanics in a porous channel with a contracting and/or expanding wall include the works by
Hatami et al. [9], Boutros et al. [10], Xinhui et al. [11], Si et al. [12], Ahmed et al. [13] and
Darvishi et al. [14]. These articles have considered many multi-physical effects including
non-Newtonian fluids, magnetohydrodynamics, chemical reaction and heat and mass transfer.
Nanofluids also constitute a significant development in thermofluid dynamics in
recent years. The term nanofluid was popularized by Choi [15]. A nanofluid is characterized
as the suspension synthesized via scattering of nano-sized particles in a base fluid. With the
rapid develops in nano-manufacturing, many low-cost combinations of liquid/particle are
now obtainable. These include particles of metals such aluminum, copper, gold, iron and
titanium or their oxides. The base fluids used are usually water, ethylene glycol, toluene and
oil. A key feature of nanofluids is their demonstrated ability to improve the efficiency of heat
transfer equipment as documented by Eastman et al. [16]. Khairul et al. [17] reported on
experimental results concerning the impressive thermal properties of the nanofluids. The
acceleration in deployment of nanofluids has required both extensive laboratory and field
testing and also theoretical and computational simulations. The fundamental idea of
nanofluids is to combine the two substances to form a heat transfer medium that behaves like
a fluid, but has the high thermal conductivity characteristics of a metal. Nanofluids have
therefore been deployed in a wide spectrum of technological applications including
microelectronics, solar cells, pharmaceutical processes, hybrid-powered engines, vehicle
thermal management, refrigeration/chiller systems, heat exchangers, nuclear reactor coolants,
lubricants, space technology, combustion devices and rocket propellants, as elaborated by
Bég and Tripathi [18]. Extensive reviews and analyses of nanofluids have been reported by
many researchers – see for example Kakaç and Pramuanjaroenkij [19], Hamad and Ferdows
[20].
A substantial thrust in modern fluid mechanics has been biological transport. A sub-
set of such flows is bioconvection. Bioconvection can be defined as pattern formation in
suspensions of microorganisms, such as bacteria and algae, due to up-swimming of the
microorganisms towards a specific taxis e.g. light, gravity, chemicals, magnetic fields,
oxygen. Detailed elaboration is given in Pedley et al. [21]. It results from an unstable density
stratification induced by upswimming microorganisms which occurs when the
microorganisms (heavier than water) accumulate in the upper regions of the fluid,
manifesting in a special type of hydrodynamic instability which are observable as
bioconvection plumes, as discussed by Uddin et al. [22]. A refinement in bioconvection is
7
achieved by the careful suspension of microorganisms in nanofluids which serves to enhance
thermal conductivity as well as stability of the resulting bio-nanofluid. Raees et al. [23]
studied computationally the forced/free convection in buoyancy-driven nano-liquid film flow
containing gyrotactic microorganisms using both a passively and actively controlled
nanofluid with a finite difference technique. Raees et al. [24] simulated numerically the
unsteady squeezing flow and heat transfer through a channel in a nanofluid containing
microorganisms with wall expansion and contraction effects. Basir et al. [25] investigated
transient multi-slip nanofluid bioconvection from an extending cylindrical body and
considered the effects of hydrodynamic, thermal and micro-organism slip.
Motivated by further refining physico-mathematical modelling of channel bio-
convection nanofluid flows, in the present work, we extend the analysis of Xinhui et al. [11]
to obtain solutions of the flow, heat, nano-particle and micro-organism diffusion in unsteady
bioconvective nanofluid flow in a porous channel with an expanding and contracting wall.
Here we considered four slip mechanisms i.e. velocity, thermal, mass (nano-particle species)
and micro-organism slip at the upper wall of a two-dimensional channel. The channel plates
are parallel, the upper plate being porous and the lower plate being impermeable. Validation
of the solution obtained is achieved with an excellent agreement.
2. MATHEMATICAL MODEL
Consider a two-dimensional unsteady laminar forced bioconvective slip flow of nanofluid in
a horizontal semi-infinite channel with the distance a t between two walls (see Fig. 1).
The upper channel wall has nanofluid injected at velocity, wv , and is expanding or
contracting uniformly at a time-dependent rate, a
t
. The plate separation is therefore a
function of time and equals ).(ta The lower channel wall is a static impermeable surface.
The coordinate system is selected such that the x axis is along the lower plate and the
y axis is normal to the plate. u and v denote the velocity components in the x and y
directions, respectively. , ,T C N are the temperature of the fluid, the nanoparticle volume
fraction and density of motile micro-organisms, respectively. The temperatures are assumed
to be constant on the lower and upper walls and are denoted, respectively by as 1T and 2T .
In addition to this, the nanoparticle volume fraction on the upper wall is 2C and that on the
8
lower wall is 1C . The density of motile microorganisms on the upper wall is prescribed as
2N and on the lower wall as 1N .
2 2,slip slipT T T C C C
2 slipN N N
slipu u at y = a t ,wv Aav
a t
1 1,T T C C
1N N
Figure 1: Physical configuration for bioconvection nanofluid slip channel flow with an
expanding or contracting wall (model for adaptive microbial nanofluid fuel cell)
Here the base fluid is taken as water and nano-particles are suspended in the base fluid. The
resulting nanofluid is assumed to be stable and does not permit agglomeration in the fluid,
thereby allowing the micro-organisms to be alive [24]. Also the direction of microorganism’s
swimming is independent of nanoparticles [25]. Under these assumptions we employ the
Buongiorno nanofluid model [26] which emphasizes Brownian motion and thermophoresis as
the principal mechanisms for nano-particle thermal enhancement. This model generally
assumes that the nanofluid is dilute and contains a homogenous suspension of equally-sized,
nano-particles in thermal equilibrium. It infers that thermophoresis and Brownian motion
effects dominate over other nanoscale effects such as ballistic collisions, micro-convection
patterns etc. The Buongiorno model has been proven to widely applicable in nanoscale
transport phenomena and extensive investigations have been reported. These include
Malvandi et al. [27] for buoyancy-driven pumping, Xu et al. [28] for mixed convection,
Sheremet et al. [29] for nanofluid flows in porous media enclosures, Akbar et al. [30] for
electro-conductive nanofluid extrusion, Uddin et al. [31] for high temperature radiative
processing of aerospace nanomaterials and also very recently by Uddin et al. [32] for
anisotropic slip stagnation nanofluid gyrotactic bioconvection flows. Buongiorno’s model
O x
y
Expanding/contracting upper wall
Impermeable static lower wall
Gyrotactic (compensating torque)
driven micro-organisms
Metallic nano-particles
Wall mass flux (suction/injection)
Lower wall conditions
Upper wall conditions
9
was originally adapted for laminar boundary layers by Kuznetsov and Nield [33]. Using this
model, the governing partial differential equations of mass, momentum, thermal energy,
nano-particle concentration and micro-organism density conservation emerge in the
following forms:
0,v (1)
21,
vv v p v
t
(2)
2
0
0
TB
DTv T T D T C T T
t T
, (3)
2 2
0
TB
DCv C D C T
t T
, (4)
0n
jt
(5)
Here ,v u v are the velocity components along and perpendicular to the wall, p is the
pressure, ( )
( )
p
f
c
c
is the ratio of nano-particle heat capacity and the base fluid heat
capacity, 0( ) f
k
c
is the thermal diffusivity of the fluid, is the density of the base fluid,
is the kinematic viscosity, BD is the Brownian diffusion coefficient and TD is the
thermophoresis diffusion coefficient, 0T is the reference temperature. Furthermore, j which
denotes the flux of microorganisms can be written as:
nj N v N v D N
(6)
Also 2 0
cv CC C
bW
is the average swimming velocity vector of micro-organisms in
nanofluids, nD designates the species diffusivity of micro-organisms, b denotes the
chemotaxis constant, Wc signifies the maximum cell swimming speed, 0C is the reference
concentration and C
Cy
. For the two-dimensional case, Eqns. (2)–(5) can be written as:
0,u v
x y
(7)
10
2 2
2 2
1,
u u u p u uu v
t x y x x y
(8)
2 2
2 2
1,
v v u p v vu v
t x y y x y
(9)
2 2
0 2
0
2
22
,TB
T T T T Tu v
t x y x y
DT C T C T TD
x x y y T x y
(10)
2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2
0
,TB
DC C Cu v D
t
C C
x y x y T x
C
y
C
(11)
2
2 2
0
2 2
.ncbWN N N C C N N
u v N N Dt x y C x x y y x yC
(12)
The relevant boundary conditions are following Dauenhauer and Majdalani [34], Cao et al.
[35] and Raza et al. [36]:
2 2 2
1 1 1
, ,
, at
0, 0, , at 0
,
,
slip
slip slip slip
wu u v
T T T C C C N N N y a t
u v T T C C N N y
v Aa t
(13)
where 1slip
uu S
y
is the linear slip velocity, 1S is the velocity slip factor, 1slipT DT
y
is
the thermal slip, 1D is the thermal slip factor, 1slipC EC
y
is the mass (nano-particle) slip,
1E is the mass (nano-particle) slip factor, 1slipN FN
y
is the micro-organism slip and 1F is
the micro-organism slip factor. wA v a t is the coefficient of the injection which is a
measure of permeability of the wall [34]. Defining the following similarity transformations
[11]:
11
2
0 0
2 0 2 0 2
, ( , ) , , ,
, , .
yu x F t v t
a t a t
T T C C N
T T C
t
C N
Fa
(14)
By substituting Eqns. (14) into Eqns. (7) – (12) together with boundary conditions (13) and
eliminating the pressure gradient terms from the momentum equations (8) and (9), the
resulting system of similarity differential equations with respect to both time and space can
be obtained following transformation [6], [11]: as follows:
0)3()Re( /////////// fffffff iv (15)
2Pr Re Pr 0f Nb Nt (16)
Pr Re Pr 0Nt
Le f LeNb
(17)
Pr Re Pr 0Pe Lb f Lb (18)
where Re
Ff , Re wav
is the permeation Reynolds number,
a a
is the wall expansion
ratio, 0
Pr
is the Prandtl number,
2 0
0
BD C CNb
is the Brownian motion
parameter, 2 0
0 0
TD T TNt
T
is the thermophoresis parameter, 0
B
LeD
is the Lewis
number, 0
n
LbD
is the bioconvection Lewis number and c
n
bWPe
D is the bioconvection
Péclet number. Note that 0 corresponds to an expanding upper wall and
0 corresponds to a contracting upper wall. For =0 the upper wall is static i.e. the
channel plate separation is fixed.
The corresponding boundary conditions are:
1 1 1
1 1 1 1
0 0, 0 0, 0 , 0 , 0 ,
1 1, 1 1 , 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 , 1 1 1
f f
f f a f b c d
(19)
12
Where 11
Sa
a
is the velocity slip parameter, 1
1
Db
a is the thermal slip parameter,
11
Ec
a is the mass (nano-particle) slip parameter, 1
1
Fd
a is the microorganism slip
parameter, and 1 0 1 0 11 1 1
2 0 2 0 2
, ,T T C C N
T T C C N
are constants. In the present work we
confine attention to positive permeation Reynolds number which physically corresponds to
injection at the upper wall i.e. suction (negative permeation Reynolds number is not
considered since it is not relevant to coolant designs). The model developed herein considers
viscous, incompressible, biological fluid suspensions. Many such fluids exist including water-
based liquids containing bacterial (Bacillus, Chlamydomonas, Volvox, and Tetrahymena) ,
algal or zooplankton suspensions, as elaborated by Pedley and Kessler [37]. The presence of
nano-particles does not alter the incompressibility or biological nature of such suspensions as
the nano-particles do not interact with the motile (i.e. self-propelled) micro-organisms. They
are separate “species”. The micro-organisms possess mean diameters which range from 1 to
200 micro-metres and are therefore significantly larger than nano-particle dimensions. These
micro-organisms, which are considered to be gyrotactic in the present study, possess slightly
greater densities than the water base fluid e.g. several percent for algae and no more than 10
percent for bacteria e.g. B. subtilis. Excellent details are provided by Hart & Edwards [38].
3. PHYSICAL QUANTITIES FOR MEDICAL ENGINEERING DESIGN
The quantities of practical interest in this study are the Nusselt number xNu ,
Sherwood number ,xSh and the density number of motile micro-organisms xNn , which are
defined, respectively as:
2 0 2 0 2
, , .
( ) (C )
w m n
x x x
B n
a t q a t q a t qNu Sh Nn
k T T D C D N
(20)
where , and w m nq q q represent the surface heat flux, surface mass flux and the surface
motile microorganism flux, respectively and are defined by:
, , .w m B n n
y a t y a t y a t
T C Nq k q D q D
y y y
(21)
Substituting Eqs. (14), (21) into (20), the following expressions are obtained:
13
'(1) , '(1) , '(1) .x x xNu Sh Nn (22)
4. NUMERICAL SOLUTION AND VALIDATION
The two point boundary problem defined by Eqns. (15) – (18) under boundary conditions
(19) is strongly nonlinear. A computational method is therefore adopted, namely the Runge-
Kutta-Felhberg fourth-fifth order shooting method available in the Maple software via built-
in functions. This method has been successfully used by many researchers in order to solve
complex higher order, nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODEs). The details of the
algorithm are lucidly documented in Uddin et al. [39], Bég et al. [40] and Bég and Makinde
[41] and are therefore not repeated here. Validation of the general model developed is not
possible with published solutions from the literature and therefore we employ a second order
accurate finite difference algorithm known as Nakamura’s method to validate the general
Maple solutions. The Nakamura tridiagonal method [42] generally achieves fast convergence
for nonlinear viscous flows which may be described by either parabolic (boundary layer) or
elliptic (Navier-Stokes) equations. The coupled 10th
order system of nonlinear, multi-degree,
ordinary differential equations defined by (15)–(18) with boundary conditions (19) is solved
using the NANONAK code in double precision arithmetic in Fortran 90, as elaborated by
Bég [43]. Computations are performed on an SGI Octane Desk workstation with dual
processors and take seconds for compilation. As with other difference schemes, a reduction in
the higher order differential equations, is also fundamental to Nakamura’s method. The
method has been employed successfully to simulate many sophisticated nonlinear transport
phenomena problems e.g. magnetized bio-rheological coating flows (Bég et al. [44]). Earlier
it has been employed in viscoelastic Falkner-Skan flows (Bég et al. [45] and rotating
micropolar convection flows (Gorla and Nakamura [46]). Intrinsic to this method is the
discretization of the flow regime using an equi-spaced finite difference mesh in the
transformed coordinate (). The partial derivatives for f, , and with respect to are
evaluated by central difference approximations. An iteration loop based on the method of
successive substitution is utilized to advance the solution i.e. march along. The finite
difference discretized equations are solved in a step-by-step fashion on the -domain. For the
energy, nano-particle species and motile micro-organism density conservation Eqns. (16) -
(18) which are second order multi-degree ordinary differential equations, only a direct
substitution is needed. However a reduction is required for the fourth order momentum Eqn.
(25). We apply the following substitutions:
14
P = f ///
(23)
Q = (24)
R = (25)
S = (26)
The ODEs (15)-(18) then retract to:
Nakamura momentum equation:
11
/
1
//
1 TPCPBPA (27)
Nakamura energy equation:
22
/
2
//
2 TQCQBQA (28)
Nakamura nano-particle species equation:
33
/
3
//
3 TRCRBRA (29)
Nakamura motile micro-organism density number equation:
44
/
4
//
4 TSCSBSA (30)
Here Ai=1,2,3,4, Bi=1,2,3,4, Ci=1,2,3,4 are the Nakamura matrix coefficients, Ti=1,2,3,4 are
the Nakamura source terms containing a mixture of variables and derivatives associated with
the respective lead variable (P, Q, R, S). The Nakamura Eqns. (27)–(30) are transformed to
finite difference equations and these are orchestrated to form a tridiagonal system which due
to the high nonlinearity of the numerous coupled, multi-degree terms in the momentum,
energy, nano-particle species and motile micro-organism density conservation equations, is
solved iteratively. Householder’s technique is ideal for this iteration. The boundary
conditions (19) are also easily transformed. Further details of the NTM approach are
provided in the comprehensive treatise of Nakamura [47]. Applications in non-Newtonian
magnetic channel flows are documented in the review by Bég [48]. Comparisons are
documented in Tables 1-4 for heat transfer rate and nano-particle mass transfer rate at the
upper wall ( =1) i.e. - /(1) and -
/(1) , respectively. Generally very close correlation
is obtained over a range of (contracting, expanding and stationary upper wall cases), b1
and c1 values. Confidence in the Maple RK45 numerical solutions is therefore justifiably
high.
15
b1 - /(1)
Maple
- /(1)
Nakamura
- /(1)
Maple
- /(1)
Nakamura
- /(1)
Maple
- /(1)
Nakamura
=-0.5 = -0.5 =0 =0 =+0.5 =+0.5
0.25 0.43851662 0.43851788 0.10479830 0.10479828 0.02415781 0.02415742
0.50 0.55356648 0.55356475 0.11035680 0.11035704 0.02444230 0.02444204
0.75 0.74039460 0.74039503 0.11650804 0.11650796 0.02473331 0.02473307
1.00 1.06979037 1.06979217 0.12334615 0.12334589 0.02503103 0.02503096
Table 1: Values of 1 1 1'(1) for 0.1, 0.5, 1Nt Nb a c d Pe Le Lb with Re =
0.5 for various expansion ratio () and thermal slip parameter (b1) values.
b1 - /(1)
Maple
- /(1)
Nakamura
- /(1)
Maple
- /(1)
Nakamura
- /(1)
Maple
- /(1)
Nakamura
=-0.5 = -0.5 =0 =0 =+0.5 =+0.5
0.25 0.30960126 0.30960098 0.07392428 0.07392387 0.01684928 0.01684864
0.50 0.36323052 0.36323104 0.07665052 0.07665002 0.01698722 0.01698691
0.75 0.43746994 0.43746887 0.07957625 0.07957597 0.01712735 0.01712702
1.00 0.54493004 0.54493028 0.08272295 0.08272316 0.01726972 0.01726958
Table 2: Values of 1 1 1'(1) for 0.1, 0.5, 1Nt Nb a c d Pe Le Lb with Re =
0.6 for various expansion ratio () and thermal slip parameter (b1) values.
c1 -/(1)
Maple
-/(1)
Nakamura
-/(1)
Maple
- /(1)
Nakamura
- /(1)
Maple
-/(1)
Nakamura
=-0.5 = -0.5 =0 =0 =+0.5 =+0.5
0.25 0.87883680 0.87883613 0.48948165 0.48948214 0.25131513 0.25131495
0.50 1.02368938 1.02368895 0.52535169 0.52535196 0.25985873 0.25985808
0.75 1.22567972 1.22567904 0.56689568 0.56689492 0.26900392 0.26900343
1.00 1.52688227 1.52688256 0.61557581 0.61557505 0.27881661 0.27881606
Table 3: Values of -/(1) for Nt = Nb = a1 = b1 = d1=0.1, Pe = Le = Lb = 0.5 with Re =
0.9 for various expansion ratio () and nano-particle mass slip parameter (c1) values.
16
c1 -/(1)
Maple
-/(1)
Nakamura
-/(1)
Maple
- /(1)
Nakamura
- /(1)
Maple
-/(1)
Nakamura
=-0.5 = -0.5 =0 =0 =+0.5 =+0.5
0.25 0.77028858 0.77028903 0.41889688 0.41889712 0.21232448 0.21232463
0.50 0.87377120 0.87377201 0.44433169 0.44433221 0.21833443 0.21833491
0.75 1.00936233 1.00936197 0.47305578 0.47305614 0.22469470 0.22469405
1.00 1.19474231 1.19474274 0.50575154 0.50575093 0.23143684 0.23143702
Table 4: Values of -/(1) for Nt = Nb = a1 = b1 = d1=0.1, Pe = Le = Lb = 0.5 with Re =
1.0 for various expansion ratio () and nano-particle mass slip parameter (c1) values.
Tables 1 -4 show that temperature gradient i.e. upper wall heat transfer rate, '(1) ,
decreases with increasing expansion parameter ratio and permeation Reynolds number.
'(1) however increases with increasing magnitude of thermal slip, 1.b Furthermore nano-
particle solutal gradient i.e. nano-particle upper wall mass transfer rate '(1) is found to
consistently reduce with increasing and Re. '(1) whereas it is enhanced significantly
with increasing nano-particle mass slip, 1.c
5. COMPUTATIONAL RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In this section Maple numerical graphical solutions are presented for the effects of several
controlling parameters on the dimensionless velocity, f , temperature , nanoparticle
volume fraction and motile micro-organism density function . We consider water-
based bio-nanofluid for which Pr = 6.8. Maple solutions are presented in Figs. 2-10.
Figure 2: Effect of the expansion ratio parameter on velocity f with Re =5 (Maple
RK45 solution) with Nt = Nb = a1 = b1 = c1= d1=0.1, Pe = Le = Lb = 0.5.
10, 5,0,5,10
17
Fig. 2 depicts the evolution in velocity f in the channel with variation in wall expansion
ratio ( ) with injection at the upper wall (Re = 5.0). With negative (upper wall
contracting) near the lower wall (static) and in the lower channel half space (0 0.5)
velocity is observed to be strongly reduced i.e. the flow is decelerated. Conversely with
positive (upper wall expanding) near the lower wall (static) and in the lower channel half
space (0 0.5) velocity is observed to be strongly elevated i.e. the flow is accelerated.
However in the upper channel half space (0.5 1.0) the contrary behavior is computed
i.e. the flow is decelerated with positive (upper wall expanding) whereas it is accelerated
with negative (upper wall contracting). Evidently the greatest acceleration occurs closer to
the lower plate for the expanding upper wall scenario since greater momentum transferred to
the body of the fluid and this in conjunction with the injection at the upper wall (permeation
Reynolds number, Re >0) aids flow development as far as into the lower channel half space.
The geometry we have studied is employed in certain microbial fuel cell (MFC) designs.
MFCs are biological fuel cells comprising a bio-electrochemical system which can be used to
harness bacterial (micro-organism) propulsion to generate a current externally. The designs in
which one wall is static and impervious and the other is stretchable have been shown to be
potentially conducive to developing asymmetric flow distributions of micro-organisms which
in turn can assist in increasing fuel cell efficiency. The extending/contracting nature of the
upper wall in fact is used to simulate lipid layers in these fuel cells which possess natural
elasticity. This allows them to adjust their state intelligently depending on the migration of
micro-organisms towards the upper wall. This also works as a “smart” design feature in such
fuel cells. Relevant works which elaborate on these structural wall features of next generation
fuel cells include Du et al. [49] who explore applications of such features in environmental
and bio-energy systems and Sun [50]. The presence of transpiration at the lower wall may
further be used as a mechanism to simulate super-capactive designs which utilize mass flux at
one or more fuel cell walls to improve energy yield in more complex energy-harvesting bio-
resource devices [51, 52]. In the present work we consider nanoscale-modified MFCs by
exploring the thermo-nano-bioconvection fluid dynamics of such systems and do not dwell on
efficiency (thermodynamic) aspects, although this constitutes a possible extension to the
work, which is being considered presently and which it is envisaged may be explored by
other researchers.
18
Figs. 3(a)-(c) display the variations in dimensionless temperature, nanoparticle volume
fraction and motile micro-organism density function, respectively, for different values of wall
expansion ratio ( ) and permeation Reynolds number (Re). Fig. 3a shows that for the
expanding upper wall case ( =0.5), there is a weak decrease in temperatures throughout the
channel span. Conversely for the contracting upper wall case, ( = -0.5) the temperature is
weakly increased. The stationary upper wall case ( =0) is observed to fall between the
expanding and contracting case profiles. With increasing permeation Reynolds number,
temperature is significantly elevated throughout the channel width. This is attributable to the
momentum boost in the flow associated with injected nanofluid via the upper wall. This
assists thermal diffusion and energizes the channel flow which will elevate biofuel cell
efficiency. Permeation Reynolds number embodies the relative significance of the inertia
effect compared to the viscous effect. For Re = 1 both inertial and viscous forces are of the
same order of magnitude. However for Re = 3, inertial force significantly exceeds viscous
forces and this in turn exacerbates the thermal diffusion in the nanofluid. In all cases,
maximum temperatures are attained at the upper (dynamic) wall and profiles exhibit a
monotonic ascent from the lower wall to converge smoothly at the upper wall. Fig. 3b
demonstrates that nano-particle species concentration (volume fraction) is also
enhanced with increasing Reynolds number from 1 to 3. The injection of nanofluid via the
upper wall therefore serves to elevate concentration of suspended nano-particles in the
channel and gradients of profiles are in fact sharper ascents than for the temperature field.
However the influence of the expansion parameter is the reverse of that computed for the
temperature field. For the expanding upper wall case ( =0.5), there is a substantial
enhancement in nanoparticle volume fraction (concentration), whereas for the contracting
upper wall case, ( = -0.5) the nanoparticle concentration is suppressed. The stationary upper
wall case ( =0) again lies between these other two cases. For both the temperature and
nano-particle concentration fields, the influence of Reynolds number and expansion
parameter is sustained across the entire channel. Fig. 3c shows that the micro-organism
density function, is increased with an expanding upper wall ( =0.5) whereas it is reduced
with a contracting upper wall ( = -0.5), only in the region near the lower static wall; further
from this zone there is a reversal in trends through the core flow one of the channel and for
much of the channel upper half space. The pattern is then reversed again as we approach the
upper wall. The peak micro-organism density values are localized closer to the lower static
wall for Re =3. They migrate further away for Re = 1 and are in fact only increased in
19
magnitude for the solitary case of ( =0.5). For = -0.5, 0 the magnitudes are markedly
lower than for Re = 3) although they are less asymmetrically distributed across the channel
span. Generally however the expansion ratio and Reynolds number exert a significant
influence on the magnitude of micro-organism density through the channel i.e. the
concentration of micro-organisms demonstrates notable sensitivity to a contracting/expanding
wall and also greater inertial forces (Reynolds number).
Figure 4(a)-(d) illustrate the response of effect of velocity (momentum) slip parameter 1a
and wall expansion ratio ( ) on dimensionless velocity, temperature, nanoparticle volume
fraction and motile micro-organism density profiles, respectively. Fig 4a shows that velocity
is weakly reduced near the lower wall of channel with positive i.e. slight deceleration is
induced with an expanding upper wall, whereas the flow is weakly accelerated with negative
i.e. contracting wall. Momentum slip is imposed only at the upper wall. It is absent from
the lower wall, as is apparent from the boundary condition f /(1)=a1f
//(1) in eqn. (19). With
an increase in 1a , velocity is accentuated in the lower channel half space whereas it is reduced
in the upper channel half space, most prominently at the upper wall. Therefore lower
momentum slip at the upper wall is observed to induce acceleration there whereas a strong
deceleration is generated near the lower static wall. Greater momentum slip retards the fluid
motion near and at the upper wall. Moreover, dragging of the fluid adjacent to the expanding
wall is partially transmitted into the fluid partially which induces a deceleration. This result is
in agreement with Raza et al. [36]. Fig. 4b reveals that dimensionless temperature decreases
continuously as momentum slip is elevated i.e. with greater values of 1a . All profiles exhibit
a monotonic ascent from the lower static wall to the upper wall. For an expanding wall
( =+0.5) temperature is decreased throughout the channel whereas for a contracting wall
( =-0.5) it is elevated. An expanding wall therefore cools the channel flow whereas a
contracting wall heats it. Fig 4c shows that a weak increase in nano-particle volume fraction
is caused with greater momentum slip and with a contracting wall ( =-0.5) whereas a
marginal decrease is induced with an expanding wall ( =+0.5). Micro-organism density
function is increased substantially near the lower static wall with an increase in momentum
slip from a1 =1 to a1=10. However this behavior is reversed as we approach the central zone
of the channel and progressively a marked reduction in micro-organism density function is
observed as we approach the upper wall. The presence of an expanding upper wall has a
similar effect to momentum slip i.e. it enhances micro-organism density function closer to the
lower wall implying that the concentration of motile micro-organisms is intensified near the
20
lower wall. However towards the upper wall and indeed in the channel core flow region, the
presence of an expanding wall is found to suppress micro-organism density function. The
contracting wall case ( =-0.5) causes the opposite effect and depresses micro-organism
density function near the lower static wall but elevates magnitudes towards the upper wall.
The clustering and distribution of micro-organisms is therefore profoundly modified
throughout the channel by the upper wall condition and also by momentum (hydrodynamic)
slip even though both conditions are only prescribed at the upper wall.
Figure 5 displays the influence of thermal slip parameter ( 1b ) and expansion ratio ( ) on
dimensionless temperature, (), in the channel. Thermal slip is also imposed solely at the
upper wall, as embodied in the boundary condition (1)=1+ b1 /
(1) in eqn. (19).
Increasing thermal slip is found to decrease temperatures in the lower channel half space
whereas it elevates temperatures in the upper channel half space i.e. in the region closer to the
upper wall. Maximum temperature computed arises at the upper wall. With increasing
thermal slip less heat is transmitted to the fluid in the lower channel half space whereas more
heat is conveyed in the upper channel half space. The zone near and at the upper wall is
therefore energized and heated. The influence of on temperature is primarily modelled via
the term, /Pr in eqn. (16). The presence of an expanding wall ( =+0.5) decreases
temperatures through the channel whereas a contracting wall manifests in a temperature
increase.
Figures 6(a)-(b) depict the impact of mass slip parameter on dimensionless concentration
() and motile micro-organism density function, () through the channel space. Fig. 6a
shows that as with momentum and thermal slip, nano-particle mass flip is imposed only at the
upper wall via the boundary condition (1)=1+ c1 / (1) in eqn. (19). Unlike the temperature
response in fig. 5, nano-particle volume fraction is observed to be enhanced throughout the
entire channel with increasing mass slip, as shown in fig. 6a. Peak values are achieved as
expected at the upper wall. The diffusion of nano-particles is therefore assisted in the
nanofluid with greater mass slip at the upper wall. Higher distributions of nanoparticles can
therefore be encouraged everywhere in the channel with the prescription of mass slip at the
upper wall, which has important implications for attaining better thermal performance
throughout the entire channel, not merely in localized zones. The influence of on nano-
particle concentration is analyzed via the term, /Pr Le in eqn. (17). Confirming earlier
21
graphs, we observe that an expanding wall ( =+0.5) suppresses nano-particle volume
fraction magnitudes whereas a contracting wall ( = -0.5) is responsible for enhancing them.
(a) (b)
(c)
Figure 3:Effect of the Re on the dimensionless (a) temperature (b) nanoparticle
volume fraction and (c) microorganism density function with prescribed
parameter values of 1 1 1 1 0.1, 10, 1,Lb 0.5a b c d Nt Nb Le Pe
0.5,0,0.5
Re 3
Re 1
Re 3
Re 1
0.5,0,0.5
0.5,0,0.5
Re 3
Re 1
22
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Figure 4:Effect of the velocity slip parameter 1a on the dimensionless (a) velocity f (b)
temperature (c) nanoparticle volume fraction and (d) micro-organism density
function with values 1 1 1 0.1, 10, 1,Lb 0.5,Re 5b c d Nb Nt Le Pe .
0.5,0,0.5
1
1
10
1
a
a
0.5,0,0.5
1
1
10
1
a
a
0.5,0,0.5
1
1
10
1
a
a
0.5,0,0.5
1
1
10
1
a
a
23
Figure 5:Effect of the thermal slip parameter 1b on the dimensionless temperature with
parameter values of 1 1 1 1 0.1, 10, 1,Lb 0.5,Re 2a b c d Nt Nb Le Pe .
(a) (b)
Figure 6:Effect of the mass slip parameter 1c on the dimensionless a) nanoparticle volume
fraction and (b) microorganism density function with parameter values of
1 1 1 0.1, 10, 1,Lb 0.5,Re 1a b d Nb Nt Le Pe .
0.5,0,0.5
1
1
10
0.1
b
b
0.5,0,0.5
1
1
10
1
c
c
0.5,0,0.5
1
1
10
1
c
c
24
Figure 7: Effect of the micro-organism slip parameter d1 on the dimensionless micro-
organism density with 1 1 1 0.1, 10, 1,Lb 0.5,Re 3a b c Nb Nt Le Pe .
(a) (b)
0.5,0,0.5
1
1
10
1
d
d
0.1,0.3,0.5Nt
0.5
0.1
Nb
Nb
0.1,0.3,0.5Nt
0.5
0.1
Nb
Nb
25
(c)
Figure 8: Effect of the thermophoresis parameter Nt and Brownian motion parameter Nb on
the dimensionless (a) temperature (b) nanoparticle volume fraction and (c)
microorganism density function with parameter values of a1=
1 1 1 0.1, 1, 1,Lb 0.5,Re 3, 0.5b c d Le Pe .
Figure 9:Effect of the bioconvection Péclet number Pe and bioconvection Lewis number Lb
on the dimensionless micro-organism density function with
a1= 1 1 1 0.1, 1,Re 3, 0.5b c d Nb Nt Le
0.1,0.3,0.5Nt
0.5
0.1
Nb
Nb
1,3,5Lb
3
1
Pe
Pe
26
Therefore combining mass slip and contracting behaviour at the upper wall, overall achieves
the best performance and sustains the highest magnitudes in the channel for nano-particle
volume fraction. Fig. 6b shows that nano-particle mass slip also exerts a beneficial effect on
the motile micro-organism density function magnitudes. However the expansion ratio has the
reverse effect to that on the nano-particle volume fraction field. An expanding wall ( =+0.5)
strongly boosts the magnitudes of () through the entire channel whereas a contracting wall
results in a significant depression in () values everywhere. The influence of on micro-
organism density function is primarily simulated via the expansion ratio-micro-organism
coupling term, /PrLb in eqn. (18). Also evident is the fact that the peak micro-organism
density values migrate progressively from the lower static wall towards the central zone of
the channel as the upper wall changes from an expanding one to a contracting one, with the
stationary upper wall case intercalated between the other two cases. The distributions also
become more symmetric across the channel span. Therefore although an expanding upper
wall elevates substantially the micro-organism density magnitudes, these are confined to the
lower channel half space i.e. they are skewed towards the lower wall. Conversely the
contracting upper wall, although attaining lower magnitudes of micro-organism density,
nevertheless generates a more homogenous distribution across the channel which may impact
on microbial fuel cell efficiency. Irrespective of the value of mass slip or expansion ratio,
micro-organism densities are generally minimized at the upper wall. Therefore fuel cell
designers engaged in employing bioconvection in nanofluids are required to judiciously
deploy upper wall boundary conditions and also nano-particle slip to optimize micro-
organism replenishment and proliferation which impacts heavily on sustainable efficiency of
such systems. Further elaboration is given in Croze et al. [53]. In fig. 6a we have considered
the case Re = 1 implying that inertial forces are equivalent to viscous forces in the channel.
Further investigation, preferably experimental would shed greater light on the inter-play
between these forces and the susceptibility of micro-organism concentration and also nano-
particle diffusion to variation in the relative inertial and viscous effects.
Figure 7 illustrates the impact of micro-organism slip parameter (d1) on
dimensionless motile micro-organism density function, () through the channel space. This
slip factor is applied at the upper wall, in a similar fashion to thermal and nano-particle mass
slip via the boundary condition (1)=1+ d1 / (1) in eqn. (19). A more uniform response is
computed compared with the effect of nano-particle mass slip (which was studied earlier in
fig. 6b). Increasing micro-organism slip substantially elevates the micro-organism density
27
function primarily in the vicinity of the lower wall. The maximum, () magnitude arises
therefore in the lowest region of the lower channel half space. However as we approach the
lower central core region of the channel (0.2 0.3) there is a switch in behavior and
increasing micro-organism slip at the upper wall is observed to induce a marked decrease in
() magnitudes which is sustained throughout the upper channel half space. () values
progressively deplete until they attain a minimum at the upper wall. At the upper wall
therefore micro-organism density function is a maximum for lowest micro-organism slip
factor (d1=1).The presence of an expanding upper wall ( =+0.5) encourages motile micro-
organism density enhancement near the flower wall whereas a contracting upper wall (i.e.
expansion parameter = -0.5) suppresses values. We further note that very low values of
momentum, thermal and nano-particle mass slip (<<1) are imposed to allow the dominant
effect of micro-organism slip to be evaluated.
Figure 8 illustrates the collective influence of nano-particle thermophoresis parameter
( Nt ) and the Brownian motion parameter ( Nb ) on the dimensionless temperature,
nanoparticle volume fraction and motile micro-organism density function distributions across
the channel. The contracting upper wall case is examined ( = -0.5). Increasing Brownian
motion parameter physically correlates with smaller nanoparticle diameters, as elaborated in
Rana et al. [54] and Akbar et al. [55]. Smaller values of Nb corresponding to larger
nanoparticles, implies that surface area is reduced which in turn decreases thermal conduction
heat transfer to the fluid. This coupled with macro-convection manifests in fig. 8a, in a non-
trivial decrease in thermal energy imparted to the fluid and a concomitant fall in temperature,
(). The reverse effect is induced with larger values of Nb which correlate with smaller
nano-particles and enhanced thermal conduction leading to higher temperatures. An increase
in Nt also induces a rise in temperatures. Thermophoretic migration of nano-particles
encourages thermal diffusion in the regime and energizes the flow. This elevates
temperatures. Fig. 8b also shows that an elevation in nano-particle volume fraction, (),
accompanies an increase in Brownian motion parameter, Nb. In fact much greater
enhancement is achieves compared with the temperature field. Increasing thermophoresis
parameter, Nt, conversely suppresses the magnitudes of nano-particle volume fraction, ().
Nano-particle volume fraction is observed to ascend from zero values at the lower plate to
maximum magnitudes at the upper wall, and all profiles approach this latter limit smoothly.
Inspection of fig. 8c reveals that micro-organism density function profiles are distinctly
different from the temperature and nano-particle concentration distributions. While increasing
28
Nb values evidently promote diffusion of micro-organisms and achieve significant
enhancement in their magnitudes, conversely increasing thermophoretic parameter, Nt,
substantially depresses values. These trends are however restricted to the lower channel half
space. In the upper channel half space on the other hand, increasing thermophoresis is found
to elevate () magnitudes whereas increasing Brownian motion parameter increases ()
magnitudes. However peak values of micro-organism density function, () are localized in
the lower channel half space. The minimum value of () is observed to arise in the lower
channel half space at ~0.2, for Nt =0.5 and Nb = 0.1.
Figure 9 demonstrates the composite effects of bioconvection Lewis number and
bioconvection Péclet number on the dimensionless micro-organism density function. The
dimensionless micro-organism density magnitudes increase massively with in an increase Pe
whereas they are reduced significantly with an increase in Lb . In the computations, standard
Lewis number is prescribed as Le =1 which physically implies that thermal diffusivity of the
nanofluid and species diffusivity of the nano-particles are the same. Pe i.e. bioconvection
Péclet number embodies the ratio of advection rate of nano-particles to the diffusion rate. Pe
<10 is more realistic for simulating actual transport phenomena in bioconvection nanofluid
mechanics. Pe features only in the micro-organism density conservation eqn. (18) via the
coupling terms )( //// Pe which intimately connects the nano-particle concentration
(volume fraction) and micro-organism fields. These terms evidently have a pronounced
influence on the evolution of micro-organism density function in the channel. Bioconvection
Lewis number, Lb, signifies the ratio of dynamic viscosity of nanofluid to the species
diffusivity of micro-organisms, i.e. /Dn arises solely in the micro-organism density
conservation eqn. (18). It features in the velocity-micro-organism density coupling
term, /RePr fLb and furthermore in the expansion ratio-micro-organism coupling term,
/PrLb . The effect of Lb will therefore also be sustained in the momentum field i.e. eqn
(28). For Lb <1 the micro-organism diffusion rate exceeds viscous diffusion rate and vice
versa for Lb >1. With increasing Lb values there is a strong suppression in the micro-
organism density magnitudes, attributable to the decrease in micro-organism species
diffusivity in the nanofluid (or an increase in viscosity).
6. CONCLUSIONS
A two-dimensional unsteady laminar model for bioconvection nanofluid flow in a channel
with multiple upper wall slip effects and upper wall expansion/contraction has been studied.
29
The upper wall is porous whereas the lower wall is stationary and impermeable surface and
therefore injection is present at the upper wall. The governing partial differential equations
for momentum, energy, nano-particle species (volume fraction) and motile micro-organism
density conservation are transformed into a set of ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
using similarity variables. The resulting high order nonlinear ODEs are solved numerically
using Runge-Kutta-Felhberg integration scheme available in the RK45 shooting algorithm in
Maple software. Validation of solutions is achieved with a Nakamura tridiagonal second
order accurate finite difference scheme. Solutions are presented graphically and demonstrate
the significant influence of bioconvection Lewis number, bioconvection Peclét, momentum
slip, thermal slip, nano-particle mass slip, micro-organism slip, upper wall expansion ratio,
permeation Reynolds number, Brownian motion and thermophoretic parameter on all the
field variables. The principal deductions from the present investigation may be summarized
thus:
(i)Adding nanoparticles into base fluid containing suspended gyrotactic micro-organisms
serves to increase the nano-particle and micro-organism mass transfer rates and achieves a
stable mixture (suspension).
(ii) Increasing bioconvection Lewis number suppresses dimensionless micro-organism
density magnitudes whereas the reverse effect is induced with increasing bioconvection
Péclet number.
(iii) An increase in Brownian motion parameter elevates micro-organism density function
magnitudes whereas increasing thermophoretic parameter reduces them, in the lower channel
half space.
(iv) An increase in Brownian motion parameter also enhances nano-particle volume fraction
values, whereas greater thermophoresis parameter depresses values, throughout the channel
span. Increasing micro-organism slip is found to enhance micro-organism density function
mainly in the zone near the lower wall of the channel.
(v) An upper expanding wall decelerates the flow near the lower wall of channel whereas a
contracting wall weakly accelerates the flow.
(vi) Increasing momentum slip accelerates the flow in the lower channel half space whereas it
decelerates the flow in the upper channel half space, most prominently at the upper wall.
(vii) Increasing nano-particle mass slip at the upper wall elevates motile micro-organism
density function magnitudes.
(viii) Greater thermal slip reduces temperatures in the lower channel half space whereas it
enhances temperatures in the upper channel half space.
30
(ix) An expanding upper wall significantly elevates micro-organism density function
magnitudes through the entire channel whereas a contracting wall induces the opposite effect.
The present simulations have been confined to Newtonian bioconvection nanofluids. Future
studies will explore non-Newtonian models e.g. viscoelastic formulations [54], and will be
communicated shortly. Furthermore nano-particle geometric effects also warrant more
detailed analysis [56, 57] and these will also be explored. Additionally the current study has
been restricted to gyrotactic micro-organisms i.e. where compensating torques generated by
shear and gravity effects manifest in gyro-taxis which controls the orientation of up-
swimming micro-organisms via rotary motions. However many other taxes are prevalent and
can be exploited in microbial fuel cell design. These include rheotaxis (where the dominant
response is to shear in the ambient flow. Certain bacterial swimmers contain magnetic
particles (magnetosomes) and these cause a strong bias of the swimming motion along
magnetic field lines and are known as magnetotaxis. Gravitaxis is a gravitational-driven or
acceleration-driven taxis and for certain photosynthetic algae predominant propulsion is
generally vertically upwards. Other significant taxes are photo-taxis and chemo-taxis in which
the dominant effect is a swimming towards more intense light and chemical gradients,
respectively. All these taxes are in fact relevant to microbial fuel cell (MFC) design and
infact combinations may also be exploited. To simulate these taxes the hydrodynamic models
must be modified to emphasize the particular taxis. This involves detailed micro-
hydrodynamic analysis and modifications in hydrodynamic torque formulation. The direction
in which a micro-organism swims, is defined at any instant by the balance of viscous and
external torques on the cell. These external torques will be gravitational for gyrotaxis and will
be modified for other external taxes e.g. phototaxis or chemo-taxis. This allows the model to
be specific for a particular type of directional swimming behavior (light, oxygen
concentration, etc.). Relevant photo-tactic and chemo-tactic models have been communicated
in this regard by Ghorai and Hill [58] and Yanaoka et al. [59] and are currently being
explored.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
The authors acknowledge financial support from Universiti Sains Malaysia, RU Grant
1001/PMATHS/81125. The authors are extremely grateful to both Reviewers for their
excellent and informative comments which have certainly served to clarify and improve the
present work. O. Anwar Bég expresses his deepest gratitude to Tazzy Bég.
31
REFERENCES
[1] Hedayati F and Domairry G., Nanoparticle migration effects on fully developed forced
convection of TiO 2 – water nanofluid in a parallel plate microchannel, Particuology 24 96–
107.
[2] Wu L., Mass transfer induced slip effect on viscous gas flows above a shrinking /
stretching sheet Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 93 17–22 (2016).
[3] Mosayebidorcheh S., Analytical investigation of the micropolar flow through a porous
channel with changing walls J. Mol. Liq. 196 113–9 (2014).
[4] Odelu O. and Naresh Kumar N., Slip-flow and heat transfer of chemically reacting
micropolar fluid through expanding or contracting walls with Hall and ion slip currents Ain
Shams Eng. J. (2015). DOI:10.1016/J.ASEJ.2015.09.011
[5] Adesanya S O, Free convective flow of heat generating fluid through a porous vertical
channel with velocity slip and temperature jump Ain Shams Eng. J. 1045–52 (2014).
[6] Uchida S and Aoki H., Unsteady flows in a semi-infinite contracting or expanding pipe J.
Fluid Mech. 82 371–87 (1977).
[7] N.M. Bujurke, V.S. Madalli, B.G. Mulimani, Long series analysis of laminar flow
through parallel and uniformly porous walls of different permeability, Computer Methods in
Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 160, 39-56 (1998).
[8] M.Goto and S. Uchida, Unsteady flows in a semi-infinite expanding pipe with injection
through wall, J. Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 33, 14-27 (1990).
[9] Hatami M, Sheikholeslami M and Ganji D D., Nanofluid flow and heat transfer in an
asymmetric porous channel with expanding or contracting wall, J. Mol. Liq. 195 230–9
(2014).
[10] Boutros Y Z, Abd-el-Malek M B, Badran N A and Hassan H S., Lie-group method for
unsteady flows in a semi-infinite expanding or contracting pipe with injection or suction
through a porous wall J. Comput. Appl. Math. 197 465–94 (2006).
[11] Xinhui S, Liancun Z, Xinxin Z and Jianhong Y, Homotopy analysis method for the heat
transfer in a asymmetric porous channel with an expanding or contracting wall Appl. Math.
Model. 35 4321–4329 (2011).
[12] Si X, Zheng L, Zhang X, Li M, Yang J and Chao Y., Multiple solutions for the laminar
flow in a porous pipe with suction at slowly expanding or contracting wall Appl. Math.
Comput. 218 3515–21 (2011).
[13] Ahmed N, Mohyud-Din S T and Hassan S M Flow and heat transfer of nanofluid in an
asymmetric channel with expanding and contracting walls suspended by carbon nanotubes: A
numerical investigation Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 48 53–60 (2016).
[14] Darvishi M T, Khani F, Awad F G, Khidir A A and Sibanda P., Numerical investigation
of the flow of a micropolar fluid through a porous channel with expanding or contracting
walls Propuls. Power Res. 3 133–142 (2014).
32
[15] S.U. Choi, Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles, Development
and Applications of Non-Newtonian Flow, FED-Vol. 231/MD-Vol. 66, ASME, 99–105
(1995).
[16] J.A. Eastman, S.R. Phillpot, S.U.S. Choi, P. Keblinski, Thermal transport in nanofluids,
Ann. Rev. Mater. Res. 34, 219-146 (2004).
[17] Khairul M A, Shah K, Doroodchi E, Azizian R and Moghtaderi B., Effects of surfactant
on stability and thermo-physical properties of metal oxide nanofluids Int. J. Heat Mass
Transf. 98 778–87 (2016).
[18] O. Anwar Bég and D. Tripathi, Peristaltic pumping of nanofluids, Chapter 3, pages 69-
96, Modeling and Simulation Methods and Applications, Eds (S. K. Basu, N. Kumar),
Springer, Berlin, Germany (2014).
[19] Kakaç S and Pramuanjaroenkij A., Review of convective heat transfer enhancement with
nanofluids Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 52 3187–96 (2009).
[20] Hamad M A A and Ferdows M., Similarity solution of boundary layer stagnation-point
flow towards a heated porous stretching sheet saturated with a nanofluid with heat absorption
/ generation and suction / blowing : A Lie group analysis Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer.
Simul. 17 132–40 (2012).
[21] Pedley T J, Hill N. and Kessler J. O. , The growth of bioconvection patterns in a uniform
suspension of gyrotactic micro-organisms. J. Fluid Mech. 195 223–37 (1988).
[22] Uddin M.J., Kabir M N and O. Anwar Bég, Computational investigation of Stefan
blowing and multiple-slip effects on buoyancy-driven bioconvection nanofluid flow with
microorganisms, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 95 116–30 (2016).
[23] A. Raees, H. Xu, Q. sun and I. Pop, Mixed convection in gravity-driven nano-liquid film
containing both nanoparticles and gyrotactic microorganisms, Applied Mathematics and
Mechanics, 36, 163-178 (2015).
[24] Raees A, Xu H and Liao S., Unsteady mixed nano-bioconvection flow in a horizontal
channel with its upper plate expanding or contracting, Int. J. Heat and Mass Transfer. 86
174–82 (2015).
[25] Md Faisal Md Basir, M.J. Uddin, A. I. Md. Ismail and O. Anwar Bég, Unsteady bio-
nanofluid slip flow over a stretching cylinder with bioconvection Schmidt and Péclet number
effects, AIP Advances, 6, 055316-1 - 055316-15 (2016).
[26] J. Buongiorno Convective transport in nanofluids, ASME J. Heat Transfer, 128, 240–250
(2006).
[27] A. Malvandi, S.A. Moshizi, Elias Ghadam Soltani, D.D. Ganji, Modified Buongiorno’s
model for fully developed mixed convection flow of nanofluids in a vertical annular pipe,
Computers & Fluids, 89, 124–132 (2014).
33
[28] Hang Xu, Tao Fan, Ioan Pop, Analysis of mixed convection flow of a nanofluid in a
vertical channel with the Buongiorno mathematical model, International Communications in
Heat and Mass Transfer, 44, 15–22 (2013).
[29] M. A. Sheremet, Ioan Pop, Free convection in a triangular cavity filled with a porous
medium saturated by a nanofluid: Buongiorno’s mathematical model", International Journal
of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow, 25, 1138 – 1161 (2015).
[30] N. S. Akbar, D. Tripathi, Z.Khan and O. Anwar Bég, A numerical study of
magnetohydrodynamic transport of nanofluids from a vertical stretching sheet with
exponential temperature-dependent viscosity and buoyancy effects, Chemical Physics Letters,
661, 20-30 (2016).
[31] M.J. Uddin, O. Anwar Bég and A.I. Ismail, Radiative-convective nanofluid flow past a
stretching/shrinking sheet with slip effects, AIAA J. Thermophysics Heat Transfer, 29, 3, 513-
523 (2015).
[32] M. J. Uddin, W.A. Khan, A.I.Md. Ismail, O. Anwar Bég, Computational study of three-
dimensional stagnation point (Buongiornio) nanofluid bio-convection flow on a moving
surface with anisotropic slip and thermal jump effects, ASME J. Heat Transfer (USA) (2016).
DOI: 10.1115/1.4033581 (8 pages).
[33] Kuznetsov A V. and Nield D. A., The Cheng-Minkowycz problem for natural
convective boundary layer flow in a porous medium saturated by a nanofluid: A revised
model Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 65, 682–5 (2013).
[34] Dauenhauer E C and Majdalani J., Exact self-similarity solution of the Navier-Stokes
equations for a porous channel with orthogonally moving walls, Phys. Fluids 15 1485–95
(2003).
[35] Cao L, Si X and Zheng L., The flow of a micropolar fluid through a porous expanding
channel: A Lie group analysis Appl. Math. Comput. 270 242–50 (2015).
[36] Raza J, Rohni A M, Omar Z and Awais M., Heat and mass transfer analysis of MHD
nanofluid flow in a rotating channel with slip effects J. Mol. Liq. 219 703–8 (2016).
[37] Pedley, T. J., Kessler, J. O. 1990. A new continuum model for suspensions of gyrotactic
micro-organisms. J. Fluid Mech. 212: 155-82.
[38] Hart, A., Edwards, C 1987. Buoyant density fluctuations during the cell cycle of Bacillus
sub/ilis. Arch. Microbiol. 147: 68-72.
[39] Md. Jashim Uddin, O. Anwar Bég and Ahmad Izani Md. Ismail, Mathematical
modelling of radiative hydromagnetic thermo-solutal nanofluid convection slip flow in
saturated porous media, Math. Prob. Engineering, 2014, Article ID 179172, 11 pages (2014).
[40] O. Anwar Bég, M. J. Uddin and W.A. Khan, Bioconvective non-Newtonian nanofluid
transport in porous media containing micro-organisms in a moving free stream, J. Mechanics
Medicine Biology, 15, 1550071.1-1550071.20 (2015).
34
[41] O. Anwar Bég and O.D. Makinde, Viscoelastic flow and species transfer in a Darcian
high-permeability channel, Petroleum Science and Engineering, 76, 93–99 (2011).
[42] Nakamura, S., Iterative finite difference schemes for similar and non-similar boundary
layer equations, Adv. Eng. Software, 21, 123–130 (1994).
[43] Bég, O. Anwar, NANONAK- A finite difference code for nanofluid convection
problems of the boundary layer type, Technical Report, NANO-C/5-1, 124pp, Gort
Engovation, Bradford, England and Narvik, Norway, UK, August (2013).
[44] Bég, O. Anwar, J. Zueco, M. Norouzi, M. Davoodi, A. A. Joneidi, Assma F. Elsayed,
Network and Nakamura tridiagonal computational simulation of electrically-conducting
biopolymer micro-morphic transport phenomena, Computers in Biology and Medicine, 44,
44–56 (2014).
[45] Bég, O. Anwar, T. A. Bég, H. S. Takhar, A. Raptis, Mathematical and numerical
modeling of non-Newtonian thermo-hydrodynamic flow in non-Darcy porous media, Int. J.
Fluid Mech. Res., 31, 1–12 (2004).
[46] Gorla, R.S.R. and S. Nakamura, Combined convection from a rotating cone to
micropolar fluids, Math. Modelling Sci. Comput., 2, 1249–1254 (1993).
[47] Nakamura, S., Applied Numerical Methods and Software, Prentice-Hall New Jersey,
USA (1995).
[48] Bég, O. Anwar, Numerical methods for multi-physical magnetohydrodynamics, Chapter
1, pp. 1-112, New Developments in Hydrodynamics Research, M. J. Ibragimov and M. A.
Anisimov, Eds., Nova Science, New York, September (2012).
[49] Z. Du, H. Li, and T. Gu, A state of the art review on microbial fuel cells: A promising
technology for wastewater treatment and bioenergy, Biotechnology Advances, 25, 464-482
(2007).
[50] Y. Sun, Electricity generation and microbial community changes in microbial fuel cells
packed with different anodic materials, Bioresource Technology, 10, 10886-10891 (2011).
[51] H. Wang, J-D. Park and Z. J. Ren, Practical energy harvesting for microbial fuel cells: a
review, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49 (6), 3267–3277 (2015).
[52] J. Houghton, C. Santoro, F. Soavi, A. Serov, I. Ieropoulos, C. Arbizzani, P. Atanassov,
Supercapacitive microbial fuel cell: Characterization and analysis for improved charge
storage/delivery performance, Bioresource Technology, 218, 552-560 (2016).
[53] O.A. Croze, E. Ashraf and M. Bees, Sheared bioconvection in a horizontal tube,
Physical Biology, 7(4):046001 (2010).
[54] P. Rana, R. Bhargava, O. Anwar Bég and A. Kadir, Finite element analysis of
viscoelastic nanofluid flow with energy dissipation and internal heat source/sink effects, Int.
J. Applied Computational Mathematics, 1-27 (2016). DOI 10.1007/s40819-016-0184-5.
35
[55] N. S. Akbar, O. Anwar Bég, Z. H. Khan, Magneto-nanofluid flow with heat transfer past
a stretching surface for the new heat flux model using numerical approach, Int. J. Num. Meth.
Heat Fluid Flow (2016). In press
[56] N. S. Akbar, D. Tripathi and O. Anwar Bég, Modelling nanoparticle geometry effects
on peristaltic pumping of medical magnetohydrodynamic nanofluids with heat transfer, J.
Mechanics in Medicine and Biology, 16 (2) 1650088.1-1650088.20. DOI:
10.1142/S0219519416500883 (2015).
[57] A. Askounis et al., Effect of particle geometry on triple line motion of nano-fluid drops
and deposit nano-structuring, Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 222, 44–57 (2015).
[58]S. Ghorai and N.A. Hill, Penetrative phototactic bioconvection, Phys. Fluids, 17, 074101
(2005).
[59] H. Yanaoka, T. Inamura, K. Suzuki, Numerical analysis of bioconvection generated by
chemotactic bacteria, Japan Soc. Mech. Eng. J. Fluid Science and Technology, 4, 536-545
(2009).