nuclear pore anchor, the arabidopsis homolog of tpr/mlp1 ... · additional developmental processes....
TRANSCRIPT
NUCLEAR PORE ANCHOR, the Arabidopsis Homolog ofTpr/Mlp1/Mlp2/Megator, Is Involved in mRNA Exportand SUMO Homeostasis and Affects Diverse Aspectsof Plant Development W
Xianfeng Morgan Xu, Annkatrin Rose,1 Sivaramakrishnan Muthuswamy, Sun Yong Jeong,2
Sowmya Venkatakrishnan, Qiao Zhao, and Iris Meier3
Plant Biotechnology Center and Department of Plant Cellular and Molecular Biology, Ohio State University, Columbus,
Ohio 43210
Vertebrate Tpr and its yeast homologs Mlp1/Mlp2, long coiled-coil proteins of nuclear pore inner basket filaments, are
involved in mRNA export, telomere organization, spindle pole assembly, and unspliced RNA retention. We identified
Arabidopsis thaliana NUCLEAR PORE ANCHOR (NUA) encoding a 237-kD protein with similarity to Tpr. NUA is located at the
inner surface of the nuclear envelope in interphase and in the vicinity of the spindle in prometaphase. Four T-DNA insertion
lines were characterized, which comprise an allelic series of increasing severity for several correlating phenotypes, such as
early flowering under short days and long days, increased abundance of SUMO conjugates, altered expression of several
flowering regulators, and nuclear accumulation of poly(A)þ RNA. nua mutants phenocopy mutants of EARLY IN SHORT
DAYS4 (ESD4), an Arabidopsis SUMO protease concentrated at the nuclear periphery. nua esd4 double mutants resemble
nua and esd4 single mutants, suggesting that the two proteins act in the same pathway or complex, supported by yeast
two-hybrid interaction. Our data indicate that NUA is a component of nuclear pore-associated steps of sumoylation and
mRNA export in plants and that defects in these processes affect the signaling events of flowering time regulation and
additional developmental processes.
INTRODUCTION
The nuclear pore complex (NPC) is a large multiprotein complex
that is the sole gateway of macromolecular trafficking between
the cytoplasm and the nucleus. The mammalian and yeast NPC
consists of multiple copies of the ;30 different nucleoporins
(Nups). Together, they form a channel-like structure of eightfold
symmetry that has been roughly divided into three elements: a
nuclear basket, a central pore, and cytoplasmic fibrils. While a
small number of Nups are anchored to the nuclear envelope
membrane, others form a protein scaffold or line the central pore
cylinder with FG-repeat-containing hydrophobic domains. Nu-
clear import and export receptors traffic through the pore bound
to their cargos, and the Ran cycle provides spatial information on
the directionality of the transport (reviewed in Tran and Wente,
2006).
Recently, several reports have demonstrated that Nups are
involved in functions beyond being building blocks of the NPC.
Some Nups are highly dynamic and appear in locations away
from the pore (Griffis et al., 2002; Rabut et al., 2004). Several
Nups have mitotic functions, for example, involvement in kinet-
ochore assembly (reviewed in Chan et al., 2005). Possibly the
most exciting new function of Nups is their ability to dock specific
enzymatic activities to the NPC, thereby providing spatial reg-
ulation for the respective activities. An example that has been
known for several years is the docking of the mammalian Ran
GTPase activating protein RanGAP1 to the outer surface of the
NPC by the nucleoporin RanBP2, where it hydrolyzes the RanGTP
bound to export complexes (Matunis et al., 1998). Mammalian
RanGAP1 requires sumoylation to bind to RanBP2, and subse-
quently it was found that RanBP2 itself is a SUMO E3 ligase
(Matunis et al., 1998; Pichler et al., 2002).
At the nuclear side of the pore, the nuclear basket is also
involved in regulating SUMO modification. The Nups Mlp1/Mlp2
in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and Nup153 in mammals
dock a SUMO protease to the NPC (Ulp1 in yeast and SENP2
in mammals) (Zhang et al., 2002; Panse et al., 2003). Mlp1 is
also a docking site for heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins
(hnRNPs) (Green et al., 2003), and mammalian hnRNPs have
been shown to be sumoylated (Vassileva and Matunis, 2004). It
has been proposed that Mlps act as a quality control checkpoint
for mRNA export (Galy et al., 2004).
At the outer pore surface, another nucleoporin acts as an
anchor/activator of a step in mRNA export. The nucleoporin Gle1
1 Current address: Department of Biology, Appalachian State University,Boone, NC 28608.2 Current address: Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Univer-sity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.3 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail [email protected]; fax 614-292-5379.The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to thefindings presented in this article in accordance with the policy describedin the Instructions for Authors (www.plantcell.org) is: Iris Meier([email protected]).W Online version contains Web-only data.www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.106.049239
The Plant Cell, Vol. 19: 1537–1548, May 2007, www.plantcell.org ª 2007 American Society of Plant Biologists
binds the DEAD box helicase Dbp5 and together with the soluble
inositol polyphosphate InsP6 activates the ATPase activity of
Dbp5. This leads to a highly localized activation of mRNA
remodeling, likely involved in a release step of mRNA export
(Alcazar-Roman et al., 2006; Weirich et al., 2006). Together,
these examples support the emerging picture that precise spatial
regulation is crucial for a number of nuclear functions and em-
phasize that this spatial regulation can be provided by anchoring
enzymatic activities to nuclear pore proteins.
While the components of the animal and yeast NPC have been
identified in proteomic studies (Rout et al., 2000; Cronshaw et al.,
2002), the plant NPC is still largely a black box. Recently, putative
plant Nups have been identified by genetic screens for the
seemingly unrelated signaling pathways involved in plant-
microbe interactions, cold tolerance, and the action of the plant
hormone auxin (Zhang and Li, 2005; Dong et al., 2006; Kanamori
et al., 2006; Parry et al., 2006). The identified proteins have
convincing sequence similarity to Nup96, Nup160, and Nup133,
which are all components of the Nup107-160 complex, suggest-
ing its conservation during evolution. The Nup107-160 complex
is believed to provide a core scaffolding function for NPC
assembly in mammals (Harel et al., 2003; Walther et al., 2003).
Partial in vivo depletion of this complex from HeLa cells via RNA
interference or immunodepletion from in vitro Xenopus laevis
nuclear assembly reactions leads to defects in the assembly of
the NPC, which suggests their pivotal roles (Harel et al., 2003;
Walther et al., 2003). The various phenotypes associated with the
mutations of putative plant Nups underline that many cellular and
developmental processes involve the communication between
the nucleus and the cytoplasm via the NPC.
A nuclear rim-associated activity with developmental func-
tions is desumoylation mediated by the SUMO protease EARLY
IN SHORT DAYS4 (ESD4). esd4 mutants flower extremely early
and have pleiotropic alterations in shoot development (Reeves
et al., 2002). The early flowering phenotype is consistent with
reduced expression of the flowering repressor FLOWERING
LOCUS C (FLC). In line with the in vitro SUMO protease activity of
ESD4, esd4 mutants accumulate more SUMO conjugates and
have less free SUMO than wild-type plants (Murtas et al., 2003).
These data suggest a connection in Arabidopsis thaliana be-
tween SUMO homeostasis and flowering-time regulation.
Here, we show that mutants of an Arabidopsis protein,
NUCLEAR PORE ANCHOR (NUA), with similarity to the inner
nuclear basket proteins Tpr (for Translocated Promoter Region),
Mlp1/Mlp2 (for Myosin-like proteins 1 and 2), and Megator flower
extremely early and have several phenotypic characteristics in
common with esd4 mutants. NUA is located at the inner nu-
clear envelope, and nua esd4 double mutants resemble nua and
esd4 single mutants, indicating that the two proteins might act in
a shared pathway or complex, supported by their interaction
in yeast two-hybrid assays. nua mutant alleles show an increase
in SUMO conjugates and reduction of free SUMO, an increase in
nuclear poly(A)þ RNA, and altered expression of several genes
involved in flowering-time regulation. We propose that NUA acts
as a docking site at the inner nuclear pore for activities required
for desumoylation and mRNA export and that disruption of this
docking affects the expression of key regulators of plant devel-
opment.
RESULTS
Identification of NUA, an Arabidopsis Protein Similar to
Mammalian Tpr, Drosophila Megator, and Yeast Mlp1/Mlp2
NUA was identified in a targeted phenotypic screen of 36 T-DNA
insertion mutants in Arabidopsis genes coding for long coiled-
coil proteins that might play a structural-organizational role in
the nucleus or the endomembrane system. The genes were
selected by the following criteria from the ARABI-COIL Arabi-
dopsis coiled-coil protein database (Rose et al., 2004). The pro-
teins should be at least 500 amino acids long, with a coiled-coil
coverage of at least 50% and either a nuclear localization signal
(NLS) or at least one predicted transmembrane domain. For all
selected open reading frames, T-DNA insertion lines generated
by the Salk Institute Genomic Analysis Laboratory (SIGnAL; Alonso
et al., 2003) were acquired from the ABRC (Ohio State Univer-
sity), and segregating populations were screened for visible phe-
notypes to identify proteins with an experimentally approachable
biological role. nua-1 was identified as an extreme early-flowering
mutant that was stunted in growth and had phyllotaxy defects in
the inflorescence.
The translated open reading frame of NUA has significant
sequence similarity to mammalian Tpr, an inner nuclear pore-
associated long coiled-coil protein. Figure 1A shows the coiled-
coil domains in NUA in comparison to human Tpr, Drosophila
melanogaster Megator, and yeast Mlp1 and Mlp2. The size of the
predicted protein, the length of the coiled-coil domain, the pres-
ence of a non-coiled-coil C-terminal tail, and the distribution of
predicted NLS are very similar in NUA and the known Tpr-like
proteins (Kuznetsov et al., 2002). Using the full-length NUA pro-
tein in WU-BLAST against the plant Gene Indices, homologous
partial protein sequences with a significant identity and similarity
(>35 and 50%, respectively) can be recovered from various plant
species, including rice (Oryza sativa), maize (Zea mays), wheat
(Triticum aestivum), and potato (Solanum tuberosum). Hence,
NUA is evolutionarily conserved both among and within different
kingdoms.
Based on the existing EST and microarray data (Zimmermann
et al., 2004), NUA appears to be expressed ubiquitously in all tis-
sues and during all developmental stages. This was also con-
firmedbyRT-PCRwithdifferent tissues, including root, stem,flower,
silique, and cauline leaf (see Supplemental Figure 1A online).
Characterization of NUA T-DNA Insertion Lines
Three additional T-DNA insertion alleles of NUA were identified
(Figure 1B). Flanking sequences of the T-DNA insertion sites
were amplified by PCR and sequenced. The original allele nua-1
(SALK_057101) has an insertion at nucleotide þ1855 (with þ1
being the A of the ATG) (within intron 8), the nua-2 (SALK_069922)
insertion causes a 45-bp deletion between nucleotides þ5657
and þ5902, and nua-3 (SAIL_505_H11) has an insertion at nu-
cleotide þ7531 (within exon 29). The insertion site of nua-4
(WiscDsLox297300_17E) was mapped to nucleotide þ2145
(within exon 9).
The NUA cDNA was cloned by RT-PCR (see Methods), and the
partial cDNA fragment encoding amino acids 518 to 1248 (see
1538 The Plant Cell
Figure 1. Characterization of NUA T-DNA Insertion Lines.
(A) The coiled-coil domain prediction of NUA (At1g79280) using COILS, and comparison with human Tpr, Drosophila Megator, and yeast Mlp1 and
Mlp2. Black bars show predicted coiled-coil domains. The dimerization and NPC association domain of Tpr are also depicted. Bar ¼ 200 amino acids
(aa).
(B) Position of T-DNA insertions and PCR primers. The confirmed insertion sites in nua-1, nua-2, nua-3, and nua-4 are indicated by vertical arrows above
and below the schematic exon-intron structure of the NUA gene. Exons are depicted as gray bars and introns as black lines. Horizontal arrows indicate
the positions of PCR primers, and brackets indicate the positions of the RT-PCR products shown in (D). The area surrounding the nua-2 insertion site is
shown enlarged, and the structure of the ;200 and ;300-bp fragments derived from RT-PCR with NUA-D primers in nua-2 is indicated. ex, exon; int,
intron.
(C) Immunoprecipitation of NUA from Arabidopsis wild-type and nua-1, nua-2, and nua-3 seedlings. Arrowheads depict NUA bands, and asterisks mark
unspecific IgG bands also seen without plant extract (data not shown). Molecular weights are indicated on the left.
(D) RT-PCR products derived from primer pairs indicated on the right (as shown in [B]) and plant tissues as indicated on the top. Approximate sizes of
the fragments amplified with the primer pair for NUA-D in nua-2 are indicated on the left. Two exposures are shown for the fragments amplified with
NUA-D primers. The primer combinations in each reaction were as follows: NUA-A, F1 þ LP115409; NUA-B, F1 þ SALK_057101LP; NUA-C,
RP057101.1 þ R1(1599); NUA-D, RP069922 þ LP069922; NUA-E, CS821281FP þ R2(3798); NUA-F, RP079795 þ R3(4993). All primer sequences are
listed in Supplemental Table 2 online. Tub, tubulin 2 (At5g62690).
Arabidopsis Homolog of Tpr/Mlp1/Mlp2/Megator 1539
Supplemental Figure 4 online) was used to express His-tagged
protein in Escherichia coli and generate an antiserum (anti-NUA)
that detects a protein of an extrapolated molecular mass of 220
kD. Figure 1C shows that after immunoprecipitation no 220-kD
protein was detected in nua-1 (note that the short N-terminal
fragment potentially expressed in nua-1 would not be detected
by anti-NUA). A weak band of approximately full-length size was
detected in nua-2 and a band corresponding to a truncated
protein of ;100 kD in nua-3 (Figure 1C). NUA protein was also
absent in nua-4 (see Supplemental Figure 3C online).
Analysis of NUA transcripts by RT-PCR showed that the locus
is transcribed both upstream and downstream of the T-DNA
insertion in nua-1, nua-3, and nua-4 but that no transcript was
detected across the insertion (Figure 1D; see Supplemental
Figure 3B online). By contrast, a small amount of full-length tran-
script in addition to truncated transcripts was detected across
the nua-2 insertion (Figure 1D). The truncated bands were se-
quenced and indicated that alternative splicing leads to in-frame
deletions of 135 bp (exon 22) or 135 þ 99 bp (exons 22 and 23)
(Figure 1B). All PCR products were derived from specific cDNA
templates since they were not present in the control reactions in
which reverse-transcriptase was omitted (data not shown) and
since all primer pairs span introns. We speculate that either
mRNA is synthesized through the T-DNA insertion (which is
confirmed in the nua-2 mutant) or that a transcript reads out of
the T-DNA into the NUA gene. In any case, no protein in the NUA
open reading frame is made downstream of the T-DNA insertions
of nua-1 and nua-4 because it would be detectable with our
antibody. In summary, we conclude that nua-1 and nua-4 are
likely null mutations. In nua-2, a small amount of full-length
protein and/or almost-full-length proteins with short internal
deletions are present. In nua-3, a partial protein of ;100 kD is
made.
NUA T-DNA Insertion Alleles Flower Early in Long Days and
Short Days and Have Pleiotropic Developmental Defects
All four lines flowered early in long days (Figure 2A, Table 1). nua-1
and nua-4 were the most extreme alleles and bolted with 4 to
5 rosette leaves in long days, while nua-2 and nua-3 bolted with
8 to 10 and 6 to 8 leaves, respectively (wild-type Columbia: 10 to
12 leaves). nua-1, nua-2, and nua-3 also flowered early in short
days (Table 1), with nua-1 again being the most severe, nua-3 be-
ing moderate, and nua-2 being a mild allele (nua-4 was not tested).
In addition to early flowering, nua-1, nua-4, and nua-3 also showed
stunted inflorescences (Figure 2B; see Supplemental Figure 3A
online) and smaller, narrower rosette leaves (Figure 2A), while
adult nua-2 plants were indistinguishable from the wild type.
nua-1 and nua-4 showed several additional developmental
alterations not found in nua-2 and nua-3 (Figures 2C to 2E; see
Supplemental Figure 3A online). The inflorescence of the mu-
tants showed some abnormalities with a reduced number of
flower buds on the top of the main inflorescence (Figure 2C).
Siliques were found at unexpected positions; two or three si-
liques were positioned at one node or at the top of the main
inflorescence. In addition, indeterminate shoots were found in
one node together with a silique and a cauline leaf. The size of
siliques of the mutants was shorter and more stunted compared
with the wild type (Figure 2D), with fewer developed seeds per
silique. Furthermore, the majority of flowers did not set seeds.
The stamens of the mutants were shorter and the size of petals
was slightly smaller than the wild type (Figure 2E).
Together, we conclude that loss of NUA leads to severe
developmental defects and that the isolated T-DNA insertions
comprise an allelic series of increasing severity in the order
nua-2, nua-3, and nua-1/nua-4.
Figure 2. Phenotypic Characteristics of nua Mutant Alleles.
(A) Seedlings at 25 d after germination, grown under long-day condi-
tions.
(B) Plants at 34 d after germination, grown under long-day conditions.
(C) Phyllotaxy defects of nua-1.
(D) Silique phenotype of nua-1.
(E) Flower phenotype of nua-1.
1540 The Plant Cell
Subcellular Localization of NUA
We used immunofluorescence with anti-NUA to characterize the
subcellular localization of NUA in root tip cells of Arabidopsis
seedlings. In interphase cells, NUA is clearly located at the
nuclear envelope (Figure 3). During prometaphase, at the onset
of spindle formation, the antibody decorated a structure in the
vicinity of the spindle, which did not directly colocalize with
tubulin (Figures 3A to 3D). During metaphase, this signal was less
obvious (Figures 3E to 3H). During cytokinesis, NUA reappeared
at the nuclear envelope (Figures 3I to 3L). Supplemental Figure 2
online shows that the NE signal is absent in nua-1, indicating that
anti-NUA specifically decorates NUA at the nuclear envelope. To
determine if NUA is associated with the inner nuclear envelope,
we performed double labeling in plants expressing a green
fluorescent protein (GFP) fusion of WIP1, an Arabidopsis outer
nuclear envelope/NPC-associated protein (X.M. Xu and I. Meier,
unpublished data). Figure 4 shows that the NUA signal could be
clearly resolved inside the GFP-WIP1 signal, indicating that NUA
is indeed associated with the inner surface of the nuclear
envelope.
nua-1 esd4-2 Double Mutant Analysis
The observed pleiotropic phenotype of nua-1 and nua-4 is rem-
iniscent of the esd4-1 and esd4-2 mutations (Reeves et al., 2002;
Murtas et al., 2003). To investigate their genetic interaction, homo-
zygote nua-1 plants were crossed with esd4-2 (SALK_032317)
plants, resulting in a wild-type phenotype for all seedlings in the
F1 generation. Double mutants in the F2 generation were indis-
tinguishable from nua-1 and esd4-2 in terms of flowering time
under long-day conditions (Figures 5A and 5B). The only differ-
ence observed was that nua-1 esd4-2 had even shorter stamens
and reduced fertility than the single mutants (Figure 5C; data not
shown). These data suggest that nua-1 and esd4-2 might act in a
shared pathway or complex that affects flowering time as well as
Table 1. Flowering Time of Wild-Type Columbia and nua Mutants, Given as Number of Rosette Leaves at Time of Bolting
Columbia nua-1 nua-2 nua-3 nua-4
Long day 12.2 6 1.0 (45 plants) 4.0 6 0.0 (53 plants) 8.0 6 0.9 (16 plants) 6.1 6 0.6 (16 plants) 4.2 6 0.4 (53 plants)
Short day 50.6 6 2.0 (11 plants) 7.4 6 0.5 (53 plants) 45.6 6 1.8 (10 plants) 33.6 6 1.2 (6 plants) ND
The 6 indicates SD. Long day: 16 h light/8 h dark, 75 to 125 mmol s�1 m�2. Short day: 8 h light/16 h dark, 85 to 95 mmol s�1 m�2. ND, not determined.
Figure 3. NUA Is Located at the Nuclear Envelope during Interphase and in the Vicinity of the Spindle during Prometaphase.
Immunofluorescence images of root tip cell files in interphase ([A] to [D] and [I] to [L]), prometaphase ([A] to [D]), metaphase ([E] to [H]), and late
cytokinesis ([I] to [L]). Green, anti-NUA; red in (D), (H), and (L) and magenta in (B), (C), (F), (G), (J), and (K), anti-tubulin; blue in (D), (H), and (L),
49,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. (A), (E), and (I) show the green channel only, and (B), (F), and (J) show the red channel only (false colored in magenta).
(C), (G), and (K) show the red and green channels, and (D), (H), and (L) show the red, green, and blue channels. The arrowhead in (A) indicates
the interphase nuclear envelope, and the arrow in (A) indicates the spindle-like structure in prometaphase. Bars ¼ 10 mm in (D), (H), and (L).
Arabidopsis Homolog of Tpr/Mlp1/Mlp2/Megator 1541
vegetative and inflorescence development but that they act
additively in stamen development. This notion is supported by
the interaction of NUA and ESD4 in yeast two-hybrid assays,
indicating that ESD4 binds specifically to the N-terminal 533
amino acids of NUA (see Supplemental Figure 4 online).
Effects of nua Mutants on Sumoylation and Flowering
Gene Expression
ESD4 is a SUMO protease associated with the nuclear envelope
(Reeves et al., 2002; Murtas et al., 2003). Mutations in ESD4 lead
to an increase in SUMO conjugates and a decrease in free SUMO
(Murtas et al., 2003). To test if mutations in NUA have a similar
molecular phenotype, we investigated the SUMO conjugation
pattern in nua-1, nua-2, nua-3, and nua-4, compared with the
T-DNA insertion allele esd4-2 and wild-type Columbia plants
(Figure 6A; see Supplemental Figure 3D online). In esd4-2, the
level of high molecular weight SUMO conjugates was increased,
while the free SUMO level was reduced, as described previously
(Murtas et al., 2003). We found that nua-1 and nua-4 phenocopy
esd4-2 and that nua-3 leads to an intermediate and nua-2 to the
least increase of SUMO conjugates. The level of free SUMO was
reciprocally altered in all alleles.
ESD4 mutations have been shown to decrease the mRNA level
of the floral repressor FLC and increase mRNA levels of the floral
activators FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) and SUPPRESSOR OF
OVEREXPRESSION OF CO1 (SOC1) (Reeves et al., 2002). To
test whether the nua mutants would also phenocopy these
effects, we tested mRNA abundance of FLC, FT, and SOC1 by
semiquantitative RT-PCR. Indeed, as shown in Figure 6B, FLC
mRNA level is strongly reduced in nua-1 and nua-4, comparable
to esd4-2, and is somewhat reduced in nua-2 and nua-3, with
nua-2 showing the weakest effect. Consistently, FT and SOC1
mRNA levels were found inversely affected.
Since nua-1 and nua-4 flower significantly earlier than the flc-3
null mutant (four to five compared with 10 to 11 rosette leaves in
long-day conditions; see Supplemental Table 1 online) (Michaels
and Amasino, 1999, 2001), additional factors involved in flowering-
time regulation are likely affected in nua mutants. Additionally,
Figure 4. NUA Is Localized at the Inner Side of the Nuclear Envelope,
Shown by Colocalization with the Outer Nuclear Envelope/NPC-Local-
ized Protein GFP-WIP1.
NUA and GFP-WIP1 were detected by rabbit anti-NUA antibody (A) and
mouse anti-GFP antibody (B), respectively, with appropriate secondary
antibodies. The overlay image is shown in (C) (green, GFP-WIP1; ma-
genta, NUA). The dashed box in (C) was enlarged, and the green and
magenta fluorescence profiles were analyzed in (D). Bar ¼ 5 mm.
Figure 5. The nua-1 esd4-2 Double Mutant Resembles nua-1 and
esd4-2 in Flowering Time and Stunted Growth Characteristics, whereas
Additive Effects Exist for Stamen Length.
(A) Wild-type, nua-1, esd4-2, and nua-1 esd4-2 seedlings at 21 d after
germination, gown under long-day conditions.
(B) Plants after 34 d in long-day conditions.
(C) Close-up for open flowers. Arrows indicate top of stamens.
1542 The Plant Cell
the ESD4 mutation was also suggested to promote flowering
both through and independently of FLC (Reeves et al., 2002). To
probe into additional effects of NUA and ESD4 mutations on the
flowering pathways, we tested mRNA levels of several additional
floral repressors and floral integrators. MAF4, one of the FLC
paralogs also implied in floral repression (Ratcliffe et al., 2003),
was decreased in nua-1, nua-3, nua-4, and esd4-2 (Figure 6B).
Furthermore, the phytohormone gibberellin is known to promote
floral transition strongly under short-day conditions via activating
the floral integrator LEAFY (LFY) by GAMYB transcription factors
(Achard et al., 2004 and references therein). When the expres-
sion levels of LFY, MYB33, and MYB65 were analyzed, elevation
in nua-1 and nua-4 mutants was apparent (Figure 6B), again
supporting the notion that several flowering pathways were
affected in the nua mutants. We noted that LFY, MYB33, and
MYB65 expression levels were not significantly altered in esd4-2,
supporting an overlapping, but not identical, effect of the two
gene knockouts on flowering regulator expression.
GFP-ESD4 Localization Is Not Altered in nua Mutants
If NUA acted as a nuclear pore anchor for ESD4, as predicted for
the interaction between Ulp1 and Mlp1 in yeast, depletion of NUA
should lead to a release of ESD4 from the nuclear periphery. We
tested this model by investigating the localization of GFP-ESD4
in wild-type Columbia and the nua mutant alleles. Figure 7A
shows that GFP-ESD4 has a nuclear location with enrichment at
the nuclear envelope in root cell files, consistent with previous
reports for ESD4-GFP (Murtas et al., 2003). Figures 7B to 7D and
Supplemental Figure 3E online show that no significant changes
in this pattern were seen in nua-1, nua-2, nua-3, and nua-4,
suggesting that the increase in SUMO conjugates in nua mutants
is unlikely to be based on delocalization of ESD4.
nua Mutants Accumulate Nuclear Poly(A)1 RNA
Both mammalian Tpr and yeast Mlp1/Mlp2 have been implicated
in affecting mRNA export. While poly(A)þ RNA accumulates in
nuclei immunodepleted of Tpr (Shibata et al., 2002) and in cells
that overexpress nuclear Tpr fragments (Bangs et al., 1998),
Figure 6. nua Mutant Alleles Lead to Increasing Accumulation of SUMO
Conjugates and Altered Expression of Genes Involved in Different
Flowering Pathways.
(A) Protein extracts from 10-d-old seedlings were probed with an anti-
SUMO1 antibody. Free SUMO is reduced (arrowhead), and the amount
of SUMO conjugates increased (bracket) in nua mutants, like previously
shown for esd4 mutants. The effect increases in severity in the order of
nua-2, nua-3, and nua-1. The asterisk indicates the putative SUMO
dimer.
(B) RT-PCR of tubulin 2 (Tub), FLC, MAF4, FT, SOC1, LFY, MYB33, and
MYB65 mRNAs in Arabidopsis wild type, nua-1, nua-2, nua-3, nua-4, and
esd4-2.
Figure 7. The Concentration of ESD4 on the Nuclear Periphery Is Not
Abolished in nua Mutants.
GFP fluorescence was observed at the nuclear periphery, in root cell files
of Arabidopsis seedlings transformed with GFP-ESD4. Bars ¼ 10 mm.
(A) Wild-type background.
(B) nua-1 background.
(C) nua-2 background.
(D) nua-3 background.
Arabidopsis Homolog of Tpr/Mlp1/Mlp2/Megator 1543
double mutants of Mlp1 and Mlp2 show no nuclear mRNA
accumulation (Kosova et al., 2000). However, they are affected in
the nuclear retention of mis-spliced RNAs (Galy et al., 2004), and
Mlp1 binds hnRNPs (Green et al., 2003). Using in situ hybridiza-
tion with an oligo(dT) probe, we tested if the nua mutant alleles
accumulate more nuclear poly(A)þ RNA compared with the wild
type. Figure 8 and Supplemental Figure 3F online show that,
indeed, all four mutant alleles show higher nuclear signals than
the wild type. Significantly, the amount of nuclear signal detected
correlated well with the severity of the mutant alleles in terms of
flowering time, SUMO conjugate abundance, flowering regulator
expression, and developmental defects. In all assays employed,
nua-1 and nua-4 were the most severe alleles, followed by nua-3
as intermediate and nua-2 as the mildest allele.
DISCUSSION
Mammalian Tpr (Park et al., 1986) and its closest structural re-
latives in Drosophila (Zimowska et al., 1997) and yeast (Strambio-
de-Castillia et al., 1999) are large coiled-coil proteins located
on the nucleoplasmic side of the NPC (Cordes et al., 1997;
Zimowska et al., 1997; Bangs et al., 1998; Strambio-de-Castillia
et al., 1999). While Mlp1/Mlp2 deletion mutants in yeast are
viable, knockout mutants of Megator are embryonic lethal (Qi
et al., 2004). Megator depletion via RNAi leads to a reduction of
cells going through mitosis (Qi et al., 2004). To our knowledge, no
Tpr knockout mutants have so far been reported in vertebrates.
We show here that a likely knockout of the single Arabidopsis
Tpr/Megator/Mlp1/Mlp2 homolog NUA is viable. Loss of NUA
leads to complex developmental phenotypes, including early
flowering, stunted growth, defects in stamen and silique devel-
opment, and changes in phyllotaxy. Our data indicate that loss of
NUA affects a number of regulatory pathways, likely by affecting
the expression level of key regulators, as shown here for the
example of flowering-time regulators.
Several immuno-electron microscopy studies have suggested
that Tpr is located at the nuclear basket of the NPC (Cordes et al.,
1997; Frosst et al., 2002; Krull et al., 2004). Nevertheless, on the
light microscopy level, a continuous nuclear envelope staining
was seen in several recent studies of human Tpr (Hase et al.,
2001; Hase and Cordes, 2003; Krull et al., 2004). Similarly, in our
system, we do not detect a punctate pattern for NUA. This does
not contradict nuclear pore localization but simply indicates that
a higher level of resolution (such as immunogold labeling)
is required to investigate the precise ultrastructural location
of NUA.
We have identified an allelic series of four T-DNA insertion
alleles that have increasing severity of several correlating whole-
plant and molecular phenotypes. In the order of nua-2, nua-3,
and nua-1/nua-4, we have observed an increase in severity of
early flowering, accumulation of sumoylated proteins, nuclear
accumulation of poly(A)þ RNA, and altered expression of several
flowering-time regulators. This suggests that these events are
connected by the activity of NUA. Molecular characterization of
the NUA insertion alleles indicates that nua-1 and nua-4 are likely
null alleles, that nua-2 is a knockdown allele, and that nua-3
expresses an ;100-kD N-terminal fragment of NUA. nua-3 acts
as a functional knockdown of intermediate severity, indicating
that part of the NUA activity involved in SUMO homeostasis,
RNA metabolism, and flowering-time regulation resides in the
N-terminal fragment expressed in nua-3.
Yeast Mlp1 and Mlp2 function in anchoring the SUMO prote-
ase Ulp1 to the NPC (Zhao et al., 2004). Mlp1/Mlp2 deletion
mutants in yeast exhibit a clonal lethality phenotype caused by
an increase of extrachromosomal 2-mm circle DNA and show an
enhanced sensitivity to DNA-damaging drugs (Galy et al., 2000;
Kosova et al., 2000; Zhao et al., 2004). This phenotype is con-
sistent with SUMO pathway mutants and can be suppressed by
overexpression of Ulp1, whereas deletion of Ulp1 or delocaliza-
tion of Ulp1 through deletion of its targeting domain mimics
Mlp1/Mlp2 deletion mutants (Zhao et al., 2004). These data
indicate that Mlp1/Mlp2 are required for Ulp1 function, most
likely through its anchoring at the NPC. By contrast, the mam-
malian SUMO protease SENP2 is anchored to the inner nuclear
pore by binding Nup153, the same nucleoporin that is involved in
anchoring Tpr to the nuclear basket (Hang and Dasso, 2002;
Zhang et al., 2002).
Our data show that in Arabidopsis, NUA and ESD4 are both
associated with the nuclear periphery, and the accumulation of
sumoylated proteins in nua mutants indicates that NUA is in-
volved in desumoylation. The close similarity of the whole-plant
and molecular phenotypes of nua and esd4 knockout mutants,
together with their ability to interact in yeast two-hybrid assays,
are consistent with a model in which the two proteins interact at
the nuclear periphery, thereby affecting mRNA accumulation,
desumoylation, and alterations in gene expression. If the inter-
action of NUA and ESD4 were analogous to Mlp1/Mlp2 and Ulp1,
Figure 8. Poly(A)þ RNA Accumulates in Nuclei of nua Mutants.
Whole-mount in situ hybridization of 10-d-old seedling petioles with
fluoresceine-labeled oligo(dT) probe shows increasing severity of nu-
clear poly(A)þ mRNA retention in nua-2, nua-3, and nua-1. Insets show
single nuclei at a higher magnification. All images were taken at identical
gain settings. The experiment was repeated twice. Bars ¼ 20 mm.
1544 The Plant Cell
we would expect that ESD4 lost nuclear rim localization in a nua
null mutant. However, our data show that GFP-ESD4 is still
targeted to the nuclear rim in nua-1 and nua-4, suggesting that
the desumoylation defect observed in nua mutants is not caused
by the delocalization of ESD4. In addition, the interaction be-
tween NUA and ESD4 in yeast two-hybrid assays might be
indirect or additional proteins might tether ESD4 to the NPC.
Further experiments are needed to test these hypotheses. Our
current working model for the functional interaction between
NUA and ESD4 is therefore that ESD4 and possibly other
Arabidopsis SUMO proteases and NUA have to be in close
proximity at the NPC for wild-type-level desumoylation to occur.
This could, for example, be envisioned if sumoylated proteins
bind to NUA, thereby being presented to localized SUMO pro-
tease activity.
Our finding that nua mutants accumulate nuclear poly(A)þRNA
indicates a function of NUA in mRNA export and/or nuclear
mRNA turnover. There are several lines of evidence for a role of
Tpr-like proteins in mRNA export. Overexpression of mammalian
Tpr and its depletion through the injection of antibodies leads
to an accumulation of poly(A)þ RNA in the nucleus, partially in
enlarged clusters containing splicing factors (Bangs et al., 1998;
Shibata et al., 2002). Overexpression of Mlp1 in yeast causes
nuclear accumulation of poly(A)þ RNA, while no nuclear poly(A)þ
RNA accumulation was seen in double deletion mutants of Mlp1/
Mlp2 (Kosova et al., 2000). The C-terminal domain of yeast Mlp1
interacts with hnRNPs via Nab2, and a model has been proposed
for Mlp1 to act as a checkpoint for RNA export (Green et al.,
2003). Mlp1 is responsible for the nuclear retention of unspliced
mRNAs, and deletion of Mlp1 leads to a leakage of intron-
containing RNAs into the cytoplasm (Galy et al., 2004). Our data
demonstrate an effect on mRNA export by a likely null mutant of a
Tpr-like protein and contrast the yeast data that show no effect in
an Mlp1/Mlp2 null mutant. This indicates that while homologs of
Tpr in different kingdoms all appear to function in an aspect of
mRNA export, their precise role probably differs.
SUMO modification has been discussed as a possible mech-
anism to control nucleocytoplasmic transport of proteins (for
review, see Pichler and Melchior, 2002). Recently, hnRNPs, RNA
helicases, and other proteins involved in RNA metabolism were
identified as substrates for SUMO modification in mammals (Li
et al., 2004; Vassileva and Matunis, 2004; Vertegaal et al., 2004).
This suggests a previously unrecognized link between the SUMO
pathway and mRNA metabolism. Our data, showing that nua
mutants are affected both in SUMO homeostasis and nuclear
RNA accumulation, indicate that such a link also exists in plants.
Loss of NUA leads to a number of developmental defects, the
most striking one being extreme early flowering under both long-
day and short-day conditions. Early flowering is consistent with
the reduction of FLC expression and a concomitant increase of
expression of FT and SOC1, a reduction of MAF4 expression,
and an increase of MYB33, MYB65, and LFY. Additional un-
tested factors involved in flowering-time regulation might also be
affected in nua mutants. If the observed effect on mRNA in nua
mutants also included a perturbation of microRNA (miRNA)
export or turnover, it is conceivable that miRNA targets are
misexpressed in nua mutants. Interestingly, both flowering-time
regulation and anther development include miRNA-regulated
steps (Achard et al., 2004; Millar and Gubler, 2005). In the future,
it will be important to determine if miRNA export is indeed
affected in nua mutants and how the observed defects in SUMO
and mRNA homeostasis are molecularly connected.
METHODS
Plant Material and Growth Conditions
For T-DNA insertion mutants nua-1 (SALK_057101), nua-2 (SALK_069922),
nua-3 (SAIL_505_H11), nua-4 (WiscDsLox297300_17E), and esd4-2
(SALK_032317), T3 or T4 bulk seeds were acquired from the ABRC.
The nua-1 esd4-2 double mutant was identified in the F2 generation from
crosses between nua-1 and esd4-2. Arabidopsis thaliana wild-type and
T-DNA lines were grown on soil under standard long-day conditions (16 h
light/8 h dark) or short-day conditions (8 h light/16 h dark) or on Murashige
and Skoog plates under constant light.
Flowering-Time Measurements
Plants were grown on soil in short-day or long-day conditions. Flowering
time was measured by counting the total number of rosette leaves at the
time of bolting. Data shown are the mean value and SD of 11 to 53 samples
per line.
PCR-Based Genotyping of T-DNA Insertion Lines
Genomic DNA was extracted as described (Krysan et al., 1999). Primers
were designed using SIGnAL iSect tools (http://signal.salk.edu/tdnaprimers.
html). All primer sequences are summarized in Supplemental Table 2
online. The exact T-DNA insertion sites were determined by sequenc-
ing the PCR products derived from primer combinations of gene-
specific primers plus T-DNA-specific primers. In nua-1 and nua-3, primer
combinations LP057101.1/LBa1 and CS821281RP/pCSA110-LB were
used, respectively. In nua-2, primer combinations RP069922/LBa1 and
LP069922/New-RB-primer were used. In nua-4, the insertion site was
mapped to nucleotide þ2145 (within exon 9) using primer combinations
CS850695FP/p745-primer and CS850695RP/p745-primer.
Cloning of NUA Full-Length cDNA and Plasmid Construction
Due to the large size of the predicted NUA coding sequence (> 6 kb), the
NUA cDNA was cloned in four fragments by RT-PCR using the Thermo-
Script RT-PCR system (Invitrogen). Partial fragments were cloned into the
pENTR/D-TOPO vector and confirmed by sequencing. The full-length
cDNA was assembled using the unique AatII, ScaI, and XmaI restriction
enzyme sites and moved into the Gateway destination vectors pDEST17,
pDEST22, and pDEST32 (Invitrogen). To validate the assembled >6-kb
cDNA, full-length NUA transcript was reverse-transcribed with gene-
specific primers. After amplification using the BD Advantage 2 PCR
enzyme system (BD Biosciences Clontech), the 6282-bp cDNA was fully
sequenced and found identical to the assembled cDNA (see Supple-
mental Figure 1 online). The ESD4 cDNA (Reeves et al., 2002) in the
pENTR/SD/D-TOPO vector was received from the ABRC. The gene was
sequenced for confirmation and moved into the GFP vector pK7WGF2
(Karimi et al., 2002).
Arabidopsis Transformation
Arabidopsis Columbia wild type, nua-1, nua-2, and nua-3 were trans-
formed by floral dipping (Clough and Bent, 1998) with Agrobacterium
tumefaciens strain ABI harboring plasmid pK7WGF2-ESD4. Primary
transformants were selected for kanamycin resistance.
Arabidopsis Homolog of Tpr/Mlp1/Mlp2/Megator 1545
RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted with the RNeasy plant mini kit (Qiagen) from
10-d-old seedlings (a stage at which none of the mutants had bolted yet)
grown on Murashige and Skoog plates under long-day conditions. After
digestion with DNase I (amplification grade; Invitrogen), cDNA was syn-
thesized with oligo(dT) primers from ;3 mg total RNA using the Thermo-
script RT-PCR system (Invitrogen). cDNA templates were PCR amplified
with gene-specific primers (see Supplemental Table 2 online) for quan-
tification of mRNA levels of flowering time integrator genes. Twenty-eight
cycles were used for tubulin 2, 35 cycles for FLC, 30 cycles for FT, 26
cycles for SOC1, 35 cycles for LFY, and 33 cycles for MYB33 and MYB65.
Sequence Analysis
Coiled-coil domains were predicted using the Protean software from the
Lasergene package (DNASTAR) and the algorithm MultiCoil (Wolf et al.,
1997).
Protein Expression, Purification, and Antibody Production
The anti-NUA antibody (OSU156) was generated against a partial recom-
binant protein (amino acids 518 to 1248). The N-terminal 6xHis-tagged
protein was purified from Escherichia coli BL21-AI using Ni-NTA resin
according to the QIAexpressionist manual (Qiagen) and preparative SDS-
PAGE. The rabbit antiserum was generated by Cocalico Biologicals.
Immunoprecipitation and Sumoylation Assays
For immunoprecipitation, all steps were performed at 48C. One milliliter of
tissue powder from 12-d-old seedlings was suspended in 1 mL of buffer
containing 50 mM Tris-Cl, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM
EDTA, 3 mM DTT, 1 mM PMSF, and protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-
Aldrich). After centrifugation at 16,000g, the supernatant was incubated
with anti-NUA (1:500 dilution) bound to protein A-sepharose for 3 h. The
immunoprecipitates were resuspended in 50 mL 33 SDS-PAGE loading
buffer and subjected to SDS-PAGE. For the analysis of sumoylation
profiles, total protein from 2-week-old seedlings was extracted as de-
scribed (Thompson et al., 2005). Approximately 100 mg of protein was
separated on a two-layer SDS-PAGE gel to resolve both the free SUMO
and high molecular weight conjugates (8% top half and 15% bottom half).
After SDS-PAGE, proteins were then transferred to a polyvinylidene
difluoride membrane (Bio-Rad), probed with anti-NUA (1:2000) or
anti-AtSUMO1 (Abcam), and subsequently probed with peroxidase-
conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (GE Healthcare; 1:15,000).
For detection, the Supersignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate
for the HRP system (Pierce) was used.
Immunolocalization
Whole-mount immunolocalization in Arabidopsis root tip cells was
performed as described (Friml et al., 2003) using anti-NUA (1:100),
monoclonal anti-a-tubulin (1:100, DM1A; Sigma-Aldrich), monoclonal
anti-NPC (1:250, QE5, recognizing Nup214, Nup153, and p62 in mam-
mals; Covance), monoclonal anti-GFP (2.5 mg/mL; Molecular Probes),
primary antibodies, and appropriate secondary antibodies conjugated
to Alexa Fluor 488 or 568 (Invitrogen). DNA was counterstained by
49,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Sigma-Aldrich). The images in Figure 3
were collected from a Leica TCS SP2 AOBS confocal laser scanning
microscope equipped with four lasers (red helium neon 633 nm, green
helium neon 543 nm, argon 458/476/488/496/514 nm, and argon UV). The
images in Figure 4 and Supplemental Figure 2 online were collected on a
PCM 2000/Nikon Eclipse 600 confocal laser scanning microscope as
described (Rose and Meier, 2001).
In Situ Hybridization
The poly(A)þ RNA in situ hybridization was conducted essentially as
described (Gong et al., 2005) with minor modifications. Briefly, samples
were taken from equivalent portions of young leaves at similar develop-
mental stages (2-week-old, four true leaves) from Columbia wild type or
nua mutants and were fixed in glass vials by adding 8 to 10 mL of fixation
cocktail containing a mixture of 50% fixation buffer (120 mM NaCl, 7 mM
Na2HPO4, 3 mM NaH2PO4, 2.7 mM KCl, 0.1% Tween 20, 80 mM EGTA,
5% formaldehyde, and 10% DMSO) and 50% heptane to completely
immerse the sample. Samples were shaken gently for 30 min at room
temperature. After dehydration twice for 5 min each in absolute methanol
and three times for 5 min each in absolute ethanol, the samples were
incubated for 30 min in 1:1 (v/v) ethanol:xylene and then washed twice for
5 min each with absolute ethanol, twice for 5 min each with absolute
methanol, and once for 5 min with 1:1 (v/v) methanol:fixation buffer with-
out formaldehyde. The samples were post-fixed in fixation buffer for
30 min at room temperature. After fixation, the samples were rinsed twice
with fixation buffer without formaldehyde and once with 1 mL of perfect
Hyb Plus hybridization buffer (Sigma-Aldrich; H-7033). To each glass vial,
1 mL of hybridization buffer was added, and samples were prehybridized
for 1 h at 508C. After prehybridization, 10 pmol 45-mer oligo(dT) labeled
with one molecule of fluoresceine at the 59-end (synthesized by MWG
Company) was used for hybridization at 508C in darkness for at least 8 h.
After hybridization, the samples were washed once for 60 min in 23 SSC
(0.3 M NaCl and 0.03 M sodium citrate) and 0.1% SDS at 508C and once
for 20 min in 0.23 SSC and 0.1% SDS at 508C in darkness. Confocal
images were acquired as described (Rose and Meier, 2001).
Yeast Two-Hybrid Assays
Yeast strain PJ69-4A was used. Competent cell preparation and yeast
transformation was performed as described (Dohmen et al., 1991).
Accession Number
Sequence data from this article can be found in the GenBank/EMBL data
libraries under accession number EF426860.
Supplemental Data
The following materials are available in the online version of this article.
Supplemental Figure 1. The Expression Pattern of NUA and the
Validation of the Full-Length NUA cDNA.
Supplemental Figure 2. Immunofluorescence in Wild-Type and
nua-1 Root Tip Cells.
Supplemental Figure 3. Characterization of the nua-4 Mutant.
Supplemental Figure 4. NUA Self-Interacts and Interacts with ESD4
in Yeast Two-Hybrid Assays.
Supplemental Table 1. Flowering Time of Wild Type Columbia, nua
Mutants, and flc-3 Null Mutant, Given as Number of Rosette Leaves at
the Time of Bolting.
Supplemental Table 2. Primer Sequences Used in This Study.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank SIGnAL and the ABRC for providing the sequence-indexed
Arabidopsis T-DNA insertion mutants, Richard Amasino for the flc-3 line,
Biao Ding for the use of his confocal microscope, Jelena Brkljacic for
fruitful discussions, David E. Somers for critical reading of the manu-
script, and Chao (Sylvia) He and Kyle Kennedy for technical assistance.
1546 The Plant Cell
Financial support by the National Science Foundation is greatly ac-
knowledged.
Received November 28, 2006; revised April 18, 2007; accepted May 2,
2007; published May 18, 2007.
REFERENCES
Achard, P., Herr, A., Baulcombe, D.C., and Harberd, N.P. (2004). Mod-
ulation of floral development by a gibberellin-regulated microRNA.
Development 131: 3357–3365.
Alcazar-Roman, A.R., Tran, E.J., Guo, S., and Wente, S.R. (2006).
Inositol hexakisphosphate and Gle1 activate the DEAD-box protein
Dbp5 for nuclear mRNA export. Nat. Cell Biol. 8: 711–716.
Alonso, J.M., et al. (2003). Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of
Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 301: 653–657.
Bangs, P., Burke, B., Powers, C., Craig, R., Purohit, A., and Doxsey,
S. (1998). Functional analysis of Tpr: Identification of nuclear pore
complex association and nuclear localization domains and a role in
mRNA export. J. Cell Biol. 143: 1801–1812.
Chan, G.K., Liu, S.T., and Yen, T.J. (2005). Kinetochore structure and
function. Trends Cell Biol. 15: 589–598.
Clough, S.J., and Bent, A.F. (1998). Floral dip: A simplified method
for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana.
Plant J. 16: 735–743.
Cordes, V.C., Reidenbach, S., Rackwitz, H.R., and Franke, W.W.
(1997). Identification of protein p270/Tpr as a constitutive component
of the nuclear pore complex-attached intranuclear filaments. J. Cell
Biol. 136: 515–529.
Cronshaw, J.M., Krutchinsky, A.N., Zhang, W., Chait, B.T., and
Matunis, M.J. (2002). Proteomic analysis of the mammalian nuclear
pore complex. J. Cell Biol. 158: 915–927.
Dohmen, R.J., Strasser, A.W., Honer, C.B., and Hollenberg, C.P.
(1991). An efficient transformation procedure enabling long-term storage
of competent cells of various yeast genera. Yeast 7: 691–692.
Dong, C.H., Hu, X., Tang, W., Zheng, X., Kim, Y.S., Lee, B.H., and
Zhu, J.K. (2006). A putative Arabidopsis nucleoporin AtNUP160 is
critical for RNA export and required for plant tolerance to cold stress.
Mol. Cell. Biol. 26: 9533–9543.
Friml, J., Benkova, E., Mayer, U., Palme, K., and Muster, G. (2003).
Automated whole mount localisation techniques for plant seedlings.
Plant J. 34: 115–124.
Frosst, P., Guan, T., Subauste, C., Hahn, K., and Gerace, L. (2002).
Tpr is localized within the nuclear basket of the pore complex and has
a role in nuclear protein export. J. Cell Biol. 156: 617–630.
Galy, V., Gadal, O., Fromont-Racine, M., Romano, A., Jacquier, A.,
and Nehrbass, U. (2004). Nuclear retention of unspliced mRNAs in
yeast is mediated by perinuclear Mlp1. Cell 116: 63–73.
Galy, V., Olivo-Marin, J.C., Scherthan, H., Doye, V., Rascalou, N.,
and Nehrbass, U. (2000). Nuclear pore complexes in the organization
of silent telomeric chromatin. Nature 403: 108–112.
Gong, Z., Dong, C.H., Lee, H., Zhu, J., Xiong, L., Gong, D., Stevenson,
B., and Zhu, J.K. (2005). A DEAD box RNA helicase is essential for
mRNA export and important for development and stress responses in
Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 17: 256–267.
Green, D.M., Johnson, C.P., Hagan, H., and Corbett, A.H. (2003). The
C-terminal domain of myosin-like protein 1 (Mlp1p) is a docking site
for heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins that are required for
mRNA export. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 1010–1015.
Griffis, E.R., Altan, N., Lippincott-Schwartz, J., and Powers, M.A.
(2002). Nup98 is a mobile nucleoporin with transcription-dependent
dynamics. Mol. Biol. Cell 13: 1282–1297.
Hang, J., and Dasso, M. (2002). Association of the human SUMO-1
protease SENP2 with the nuclear pore. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 19961–
19966.
Harel, A., Orjalo, A.V., Vincent, T., Lachish-Zalait, A., Vasu, S., Shah,
S., Zimmerman, E., Elbaum, M., and Forbes, D.J. (2003). Removal
of a single pore subcomplex results in vertebrate nuclei devoid of
nuclear pores. Mol. Cell 11: 853–864.
Hase, M.E., and Cordes, V.C. (2003). Direct interaction with nup153
mediates binding of Tpr to the periphery of the nuclear pore complex.
Mol. Biol. Cell 14: 1923–1940.
Hase, M.E., Kuznetsov, N.V., and Cordes, V.C. (2001). Amino acid
substitutions of coiled-coil protein Tpr abrogate anchorage to the
nuclear pore complex but not parallel, in-register homodimerization.
Mol. Biol. Cell 12: 2433–2452.
Kanamori, N., et al. (2006). A nucleoporin is required for induction of
Ca2þ spiking in legume nodule development and essential for rhizobial
and fungal symbiosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 359–364.
Karimi, M., Inze, D., and Depicker, A. (2002). GATEWAY vectors for
Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Trends Plant Sci. 7:
193–195.
Kosova, B., Pante, N., Rollenhagen, C., Podtelejnikov, A., Mann, M.,
Aebi, U., and Hurt, E. (2000). Mlp2p, a component of nuclear pore
attached intranuclear filaments, associates with nic96p. J. Biol. Chem.
275: 343–350.
Krull, S., Thyberg, J., Bjorkroth, B., Rackwitz, H.R., and Cordes, V.C.
(2004). Nucleoporins as components of the nuclear pore complex
core structure and Tpr as the architectural element of the nuclear
basket. Mol. Biol. Cell 15: 4261–4277.
Krysan, P.J., Young, J.C., and Sussman, M.R. (1999). T-DNA as an
insertional mutagen in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 11: 2283–2290.
Kuznetsov, N.V., Sandblad, L., Hase, M.E., Hunziker, A., Hergt,
M., and Cordes, V.C. (2002). The evolutionarily conserved single-
copy gene for murine Tpr encodes one prevalent isoform in somatic
cells and lacks paralogs in higher eukaryotes. Chromosoma 111:
236–255.
Li, T., Evdokimov, E., Shen, R.F., Chao, C.C., Tekle, E., Wang, T.,
Stadtman, E.R., Yang, D.C., and Chock, P.B. (2004). Sumoylation of
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins, zinc finger proteins, and
nuclear pore complex proteins: a proteomic analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA 101: 8551–8556.
Matunis, M.J., Wu, J., and Blobel, G. (1998). SUMO-1 modification and
its role in targeting the Ran GTPase-activating protein, RanGAP1, to
the nuclear pore complex. J. Cell Biol. 140: 499–509.
Michaels, S.D., and Amasino, R.M. (1999). FLOWERING LOCUS C
encodes a novel MADS domain protein that acts as a repressor of
flowering. Plant Cell 11: 949–956.
Michaels, S.D., and Amasino, R.M. (2001). Loss of FLOWERING
LOCUS C activity eliminates the late-flowering phenotype of FRIGIDA
and autonomous pathway mutations but not responsiveness to ver-
nalization. Plant Cell 13: 935–941.
Millar, A.A., and Gubler, F. (2005). The Arabidopsis GAMYB-like genes,
MYB33 and MYB65, are microRNA-regulated genes that redundantly
facilitate anther development. Plant Cell 17: 705–721.
Murtas, G., Reeves, P.H., Fu, Y.F., Bancroft, I., Dean, C., and
Coupland, G. (2003). A nuclear protease required for flowering-time
regulation in Arabidopsis reduces the abundance of SMALL UBIQUITIN-
RELATED MODIFIER conjugates. Plant Cell 15: 2308–2319.
Panse, V.G., Kuster, B., Gerstberger, T., and Hurt, E. (2003). Uncon-
ventional tethering of Ulp1 to the transport channel of the nuclear pore
complex by karyopherins. Nat. Cell Biol. 5: 21–27.
Park, M., Dean, M., Cooper, C.S., Schmidt, M., O’Brien, S.J., Blair,
D.G., and Vande Woude, G.F. (1986). Mechanism of met oncogene
activation. Cell 45: 895–904.
Arabidopsis Homolog of Tpr/Mlp1/Mlp2/Megator 1547
Parry, G., Ward, S., Cernac, A., Dharmasiri, S., and Estelle, M. (2006).
The Arabidopsis SUPPRESSOR OF AUXIN RESISTANCE proteins are
nucleoporins with an important role in hormone signaling and devel-
opment. Plant Cell 18: 1590–1603.
Pichler, A., Gast, A., Seeler, J.S., Dejean, A., and Melchior, F. (2002). The
nucleoporin RanBP2 has SUMO1 E3 ligase activity. Cell 108: 109–120.
Pichler, A., and Melchior, F. (2002). Ubiquitin-related modifier SUMO1
and nucleocytoplasmic transport. Traffic 3: 381–387.
Qi, H., Rath, U., Wang, D., Xu, Y.Z., Ding, Y., Zhang, W., Blacketer,
M.J., Paddy, M.R., Girton, J., Johansen, J., and Johansen, K.M.
(2004). Megator, an essential coiled-coil protein that localizes to the
putative spindle matrix during mitosis in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Cell 15:
4854–4865.
Rabut, G., Doye, V., and Ellenberg, J. (2004). Mapping the dynamic
organization of the nuclear pore complex inside single living cells. Nat.
Cell Biol. 6: 1114–1121.
Ratcliffe, O.J., Kumimoto, R.W., Wong, B.J., and Riechmann, J.L.
(2003). Analysis of the Arabidopsis MADS AFFECTING FLOWERING
gene family: MAF2 prevents vernalization by short periods of cold.
Plant Cell 15: 1159–1169.
Reeves, P.H., Murtas, G., Dash, S., and Coupland, G. (2002). early in
short days 4, a mutation in Arabidopsis that causes early flowering
and reduces the mRNA abundance of the floral repressor FLC. Develop-
ment 129: 5349–5361.
Rose, A., Manikantan, S., Schraegle, S.J., Maloy, M.A., Stahlberg,
E.A., and Meier, I. (2004). Genome-wide identification of Arabidopsis
coiled-coil proteins and establishment of the ARABI-COIL database.
Plant Physiol. 134: 927–939.
Rose, A., and Meier, I. (2001). A domain unique to plant RanGAP is
responsible for its targeting to the plant nuclear rim. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA 98: 15377–15382.
Rout, M.P., Aitchison, J.D., Suprapto, A., Hjertaas, K., Zhao, Y., and
Chait, B.T. (2000). The yeast nuclear pore complex: Composition,
architecture, and transport mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 148: 635–651.
Shibata, S., Matsuoka, Y., and Yoneda, Y. (2002). Nucleocytoplasmic
transport of proteins and poly(A)þ RNA in reconstituted Tpr-less
nuclei in living mammalian cells. Genes Cells 7: 421–434.
Strambio-de-Castillia, C., Blobel, G., and Rout, M.P. (1999). Proteins
connecting the nuclear pore complex with the nuclear interior. J. Cell
Biol. 144: 839–855.
Thompson, A.R., Doelling, J.H., Suttangkakul, A., and Vierstra, R.D.
(2005). Autophagic nutrient recycling in Arabidopsis directed by the
ATG8 and ATG12 conjugation pathways. Plant Physiol. 138: 2097–
2110.
Tran, E.J., and Wente, S.R. (2006). Dynamic nuclear pore complexes:
Life on the edge. Cell 125: 1041–1053.
Vassileva, M.T., and Matunis, M.J. (2004). SUMO modification of
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24: 3623–
3632.
Vertegaal, A.C., Ogg, S.C., Jaffray, E., Rodriguez, M.S., Hay, R.T.,
Andersen, J.S., Mann, M., and Lamond, A.I. (2004). A proteomic
study of SUMO-2 target proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 33791–
33798.
Walther, T.C., Alves, A., Pickersgill, H., Loiodice, I., Hetzer, M., Galy,
V., Hulsmann, B.B., Kocher, T., Wilm, M., Allen, T., Mattaj, I.W.,
and Doye, V. (2003). The conserved Nup107-160 complex is critical
for nuclear pore complex assembly. Cell 113: 195–206.
Weirich, C.S., Erzberger, J.P., Flick, J.S., Berger, J.M., Thorner, J.,
and Weis, K. (2006). Activation of the DExD/H-box protein Dbp5 by
the nuclear-pore protein Gle1 and its coactivator InsP6 is required for
mRNA export. Nat. Cell Biol. 8: 668–676.
Wolf, E., Kim, P.S., and Berger, B. (1997). MultiCoil: A program for
predicting two- and three-stranded coiled coils. Protein Sci. 6: 1179–
1189.
Zhang, Y., and Li, X. (2005). A putative nucleoporin 96 Is required for
both basal defense and constitutive resistance responses mediated
by suppressor of npr1-1,constitutive 1. Plant Cell 17: 1306–1316.
Zhang, H., Saitoh, H., and Matunis, M.J. (2002). Enzymes of the
SUMO modification pathway localize to filaments of the nuclear pore
complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22: 6498–6508.
Zhao, X., Wu, C.Y., and Blobel, G. (2004). Mlp-dependent anchorage
and stabilization of a desumoylating enzyme is required to prevent
clonal lethality. J. Cell Biol. 167: 605–611.
Zimmermann, P., Hirsch-Hoffmann, M., Hennig, L., and Gruissem,
W. (2004). GENEVESTIGATOR. Arabidopsis microarray database and
analysis toolbox. Plant Physiol. 136: 2621–2632.
Zimowska, G., Aris, J.P., and Paddy, M.R. (1997). A Drosophila
Tpr protein homolog is localized both in the extrachromosomal
channel network and to nuclear pore complexes. J. Cell Sci. 110:
927–944.
1548 The Plant Cell
DOI 10.1105/tpc.106.049239; originally published online May 18, 2007; 2007;19;1537-1548Plant Cell
Venkatakrishnan, Qiao Zhao and Iris MeierXianfeng Morgan Xu, Annkatrin Rose, Sivaramakrishnan Muthuswamy, Sun Yong Jeong, Sowmyain mRNA Export and SUMO Homeostasis and Affects Diverse Aspects of Plant Development
Homolog of Tpr/Mlp1/Mlp2/Megator, Is InvolvedArabidopsisNUCLEAR PORE ANCHOR, the
This information is current as of January 16, 2021
Supplemental Data /content/suppl/2007/05/17/tpc.106.049239.DC1.html
References /content/19/5/1537.full.html#ref-list-1
This article cites 59 articles, 39 of which can be accessed free at:
Permissions https://www.copyright.com/ccc/openurl.do?sid=pd_hw1532298X&issn=1532298X&WT.mc_id=pd_hw1532298X
eTOCs http://www.plantcell.org/cgi/alerts/ctmain
Sign up for eTOCs at:
CiteTrack Alerts http://www.plantcell.org/cgi/alerts/ctmain
Sign up for CiteTrack Alerts at:
Subscription Information http://www.aspb.org/publications/subscriptions.cfm
is available at:Plant Physiology and The Plant CellSubscription Information for
ADVANCING THE SCIENCE OF PLANT BIOLOGY © American Society of Plant Biologists