nuclear matter incompressibility and giant monopole resonances
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Nuclear Matter Incompressibility and Giant Monopole Resonances](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022020621/61e6e22ec851975544467990/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
C.A. Bertulani
Department of Physics and Astronomy Texas A&M University-Commerce
Collaborator: Paolo Avogadro
Nuclear Matter Incompressibility and Giant Monopole Resonances
1 27th Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics - Dallas, TX - Dec 8-13, 2013
![Page 2: Nuclear Matter Incompressibility and Giant Monopole Resonances](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022020621/61e6e22ec851975544467990/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
56 Fe→134 He+ 4n p+ e− → n + νe
Iron core in core-collapse supernovae
The iron core grows and becomes dynamically unstable as it approaches the critical mass. The main reactions are
Needs energy (124 MeV) Neutrino escapes
Pressure decreases and the core collapses
2
The Equation of State (EoS) has to cover densities of 109 – 1015 g/cm3
Nuclei are bound into nuclei until they merge (ρ0 ~ 1014 g/cm3) Pressure is essentially dominated by e- (γ = ∂lnP/∂lnρ = 4/3) For ρ > ρ0, nuclear matter becomes very hard (γ ~ 2)
![Page 3: Nuclear Matter Incompressibility and Giant Monopole Resonances](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022020621/61e6e22ec851975544467990/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Below nuclear density: - Matter is described by nuclei surrounded by a “gas” of nucleons and alpha particles - Electrons are uniformly distributed in space, inside and outside nuclei.
- In equilibrium
- At high densities nuclear matter fills the space uniformly
- Techniques for computing EOS: liquid drop, Thomas-Fermi, Hartree-Fock
- EOS is obtained by minimizing the free energy of the system for each entropy and Ye
µe = µn −µ p
EOS
3
![Page 4: Nuclear Matter Incompressibility and Giant Monopole Resonances](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022020621/61e6e22ec851975544467990/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
!
0.16 fm-3
-16 MeV
Above nuclear density: - Maximum density occurs when the inner central core reaches ρ ~ 5ρ0 - the compressibility has to be enough to allow the existence of neutron stars
with M ~ 1.4 M¤ or larger.
EOS
4
E ρ"# $%= E ρ0"# $%+118K
∞
ρ−ρ0ρ0
(
)**
+
,--
2
K∞= 9ρ2
d2 E(ρ) /ρ#$ %&dρ2
ρ0
![Page 5: Nuclear Matter Incompressibility and Giant Monopole Resonances](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022020621/61e6e22ec851975544467990/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
- Analysis of Giant Isoscalar Resonances
- Relativistic heavy ion collisions
- Neutron masses Giant Resonance: Coherent vibration of
nucleons in a nucleus - Resonances related to incompressibility:
ISGMR, ISGDR, ISGQR
EOS – Experimental Observations
5
EISGMR ≈KA
m r2
KA = K∞1+ cA−1/3( )+K τ
N −ZA
$
%&
'
()
2
+KCoulZ2A−4/3
c ≈1
ISGMR (T=0, L=0)
ISGDR (T=0, L=1)
ISGQR (T=0, L=2)
- KCoul is basically model independent - Measurements over several isotopes should give Kτ - Kτ critical to understand neutron stars
![Page 6: Nuclear Matter Incompressibility and Giant Monopole Resonances](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022020621/61e6e22ec851975544467990/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
EOS – Theoretical Methods
6
- Build an energy functional E[ρ] using an mean field calculation Each such a functional characterizes a K∞
- Get excitations such as the ISGMR from a self-consistent QRPA calculation For the nucleon-nucleon interaction
V(ri ,rj ) =VijNN +Vij
CoulVijCoul = −
e2
4
τ ij2 + τ ijri − rji, j=1
A
∑ ,jiij τττ +=
Vij
NN = t0 (1+ x0Pijσ )δ(ri − rj )+
12t1(1+ x1Pij
σ )[!k ij2δ(ri − rj )+δ(ri − rj )
!k ij2 ]+
t2 (1+ x2Pijσ )!k ijδ(ri − rjj )
!k ij +
16t3(1+ x3Pij
σ )ραri + rj2
&
'((
)
*++δ(ri − rj )+
iW0
!k ijδ(ri − rj )(
!σ i +!σ j )!k ij,
0,,, Wxt ii α are 10 Skyrme parameters
E[ρ]= Φ T+VijCoul +Vij
NN Φ
![Page 7: Nuclear Matter Incompressibility and Giant Monopole Resonances](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022020621/61e6e22ec851975544467990/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
+ pairing
vNNeff = Skyrme + pairing force
HF + BCS
€
Δ i =12
GijΔ j
ε j − λ( )2 + Δ j2j
∑
HFB
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛=⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛
+−Δ−
Δ−
k
kk
k
k
HF
HF
vu
Evu
hh
λ
λ
€
V =V0 1−ηρ r( )ρ0
%
& '
(
) *
α,
- . .
/
0 1 1 δ r1 − r2( ), ρ0 = 0.16 fm, α =1
η =
0, "volume"pairing1, "surface"pairing1/2, "mixed"pairing
3
4 5
6 5
7
![Page 8: Nuclear Matter Incompressibility and Giant Monopole Resonances](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022020621/61e6e22ec851975544467990/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
EOS + Pairing
8
v r,r '( ) = v0 1−ηρρ0
$
%&&
'
())
γ+
,
--
.
/
00δ r − r '( )
Skyrme K∞ SLy5 230 SkM* 216 Skxs20 202
Protons and neutrons tend to pair up, much like Cooper pairs of electrons in superconductors. Pairing is important in nuclei and neutron stars, but a clear understanding of the microscopic foundation of the pairing functional is still lacking.
Volume pairing
Mixed pairing
Surface pairing
Blaizot Phys. Rep. 64, 171 (1980) Shlomo,Youngblood PRC 47, 529 (1993)
![Page 9: Nuclear Matter Incompressibility and Giant Monopole Resonances](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022020621/61e6e22ec851975544467990/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
From experiment: • Δ(3) larger for (-1)N = +1 • Δ(3) smaller for (-1)N = -1 • Δ(4) reflects average of Δ(3) (N) and Δ(3) (N-1) (Δ(4) no additional information)
Δ(3) =12−1( )
NB(N −1)+B(N+1)− 2B(N)#$ %&
Δ(4) =14−1( )
N3B(N −1)−3B(N)−B(N − 2)+B(N+1)#$ %&four-point
or higher ?
Pairing Measure
three-point
9
![Page 10: Nuclear Matter Incompressibility and Giant Monopole Resonances](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022020621/61e6e22ec851975544467990/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
experiment
€
Δ o(3) =
12A1/ 3
MeV
rms for binding energies
rms for separation energies
Can Microscopic Models do better than LDM?
rms = 0.3 MeV
![Page 11: Nuclear Matter Incompressibility and Giant Monopole Resonances](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022020621/61e6e22ec851975544467990/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Blocking Procedure for Odd Nucleons
EF
v2 → ½, u → 0 for one orbit and its time-conjugate partner
)(kVpairing
EF Λ
Λ ~ 50 MeV
11
![Page 12: Nuclear Matter Incompressibility and Giant Monopole Resonances](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022020621/61e6e22ec851975544467990/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Pairing Improves Nuclear Properties
Separation energies staggering
Sn
12
![Page 13: Nuclear Matter Incompressibility and Giant Monopole Resonances](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022020621/61e6e22ec851975544467990/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Pairing vs Level Properties
( ) [ ])(2)1()1(121)3( NBNBNBN −++−−=Δ ( )
( )λλ
gNNBN 112 2
2)3( =
∂
∂=
∂
∂≅Δ−
Fermi energy (λ= ∂B/ ∂N) s.p. level density (g(e)= dN/ ∂e)
Jahn-Teller mechanism: spherical symmetry spontaneously broken (2j+1) ! double-degenerate orbits Δ(3) alternates for (-1)N = + and -
λ
degenerate shell N
λ does not vary with N ! Δ(3) = 0
λ
valence shell full N=2n en
en+1
(-1)N = +1, dλ/dN ≈ en+1 – en ! Δ(3) = (en+1 – en )/2
measure of gap in single-particle spectrum
13
![Page 14: Nuclear Matter Incompressibility and Giant Monopole Resonances](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022020621/61e6e22ec851975544467990/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Pairing vs Level Properties ∑=
=+−=A
kkspmacrospsp eEEEEB
1
,~Macroscopic-microscopic model:
( ) MeV23,2
=−
+= IImacro aAZNaE ! MeV23)3(
A=Δ
€
˜ E sp contribution : g λ( ) =3aπ 2 , a ≅ A
8MeV
€
Δ(3) ≅ −1
g λ( )≅ −
25AMeV
€
Δ(3) N( ) ≅ − 12δe
+ LDM corrections
€
2 Δ(3) even( ) −Δ(3) odd( )[ ]≅ en+1 − en
Satula, Dobaczewski, Nazarewicz, PRL 81, 3599 (1998).
14
![Page 15: Nuclear Matter Incompressibility and Giant Monopole Resonances](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022020621/61e6e22ec851975544467990/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
The uNclear Nuclear Pairing – UNEDF Collaboration • Mass tables for 2,400 nuclei have
been analyzed using different forms and methodologies for the pairing mechanism
• New functional forms for the pairing interaction have been proposed
15
experiment UNEDF theory
( ) [ ])(2)1()1(121)3( NBNBNBN −++−−=Δ
Bertsch, Bertulani, Nazarewicz, Schunck, Stoitsov, PRC 79, 0343306 (2009)
![Page 16: Nuclear Matter Incompressibility and Giant Monopole Resonances](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022020621/61e6e22ec851975544467990/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
QRPA: The Role of the Rearrangement Term
• Fully self consistent EWSR = 99.2%
• Without Rearrangement in EWSR =116%
16
h =δEkinδρ
+δEskyrmeδρ
+δEpairδρ
+δECoulδρ
δhrearrδρ
=δδρ
δEpairδρ
#
$%%
&
'((
Calculations without rearrangements tend to return higher centroids respect to the fully self-consistent case.
Avogadro, Bertulani, PRC 88, 044319 (2013)
≠ 0 if Epair depends on density
![Page 17: Nuclear Matter Incompressibility and Giant Monopole Resonances](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022020621/61e6e22ec851975544467990/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Dependence on Functional
17
Skxs20 very well
SLy5 bad results
mk = Ek S(E) dE0
∞
∫
Skm* well!
S(E) = 0 F0 j2δ E−E0( )
j∑
F0 = ri2
i=1
A
∑
![Page 18: Nuclear Matter Incompressibility and Giant Monopole Resonances](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022020621/61e6e22ec851975544467990/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Isovector pairing
18
vpairMSH (r,r ') = v0 1− 1−δ( )ηs
ρρ0
%
&''
(
)**
αs
−δηnρρ0
%
&''
(
)**
αn,
-
.
.
/
0
11δ(r,r ')
vpairMSH (r,r ') = v0 1− η+η1τ3δ( ) ρ
ρ0−η2 δ
ρρ0
&
'((
)
*++
2,
-
.
.
/
0
11δ(r,r ')
ρ =ρn +ρp
δ =ρn −ρpρ
Margueron, Sagawa, Hagino, PRC 76, 064316 (2007)
Yamagami, Shimizu, Nakatsukasa, PRC 80, 064301 (2009)
v r,r '( ) = v0 1−ηρρ0
$
%&&
'
())
γ+
,
--
.
/
00δ r − r '( )
![Page 19: Nuclear Matter Incompressibility and Giant Monopole Resonances](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022020621/61e6e22ec851975544467990/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Isovector pairing – Good globabl fits to pairing gaps
19 Bertulani, Liu,, Sagawa, PRC 85, 014321 (2012)
![Page 20: Nuclear Matter Incompressibility and Giant Monopole Resonances](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022020621/61e6e22ec851975544467990/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Isovector pairing – Reasonable Nuclear Radii
20 Bertulani, Liu,, Sagawa, PRC 85, 014321 (2012)
MSH IS+IV pairing
![Page 21: Nuclear Matter Incompressibility and Giant Monopole Resonances](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022020621/61e6e22ec851975544467990/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
12C
Hofstadter, 1953
PWBA
Radii and Skins
dσdΩ
=σM θ( )Z2
Fcharge q( )2
21
Δrnp
Measuring Rn in 208Pb constrains the pressure of neutron matter at ~ 2/3ρ0 = 0.1 fm-3. C. Horowitz
Neutron stars
![Page 22: Nuclear Matter Incompressibility and Giant Monopole Resonances](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022020621/61e6e22ec851975544467990/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Isovector pairing – Reasonable Nuclear Skins
22 Bertulani, Liu,, Sagawa, PRC 85, 014321 (2012)
MSH IS+IV pairing
Radii from spin-dipole resonances Krasznahorkay et al., PRL 82, 3216 (1999) & Antiprotonic atoms Trzcinskaet al., PRL 87, 082501 (2001)
![Page 23: Nuclear Matter Incompressibility and Giant Monopole Resonances](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022020621/61e6e22ec851975544467990/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Isovector pairing – Improves Centroids of ISGMR
23
![Page 24: Nuclear Matter Incompressibility and Giant Monopole Resonances](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022020621/61e6e22ec851975544467990/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Isovector pairing – ISGMR – Comparison to Recent Data
24 Avogadro, Bertulani, PRC 88, 044319 (2013)
![Page 25: Nuclear Matter Incompressibility and Giant Monopole Resonances](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022020621/61e6e22ec851975544467990/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Conclusions
25
EOS & Pairing Conundrum
• Nuclear pairing evidently improves masses, separation energies and staggering effects in microscopic approaches: HF + BCS or HFB.
• Inclusion of pairing complicates determination of best Skyrme models. E.g., 20% of the nuclei well explained with the SLy5 interaction, and 10% with the SkM* interaction.
• Isovector pairing improves nuclear properties ß at the cost of additional parameters
• Detailed studies using HFB + QRPA + isovector pairing with comparison with newest data on ISGMR (RCNP and TAMU) à ISGMR is better reproduced with the soft interaction Skxs20 (K∞ ≈ 202 MeV), in contrast with the generally accepted value for K∞ ≈ 230 MeV.