nrc shelter-hlp project preliminary findings and cautious suggestions
TRANSCRIPT
NRC Shelter-HLP Project
Preliminary Findings
And
Cautious Suggestions
The Challenge:
• Humanitarian Organisations often get stuck -- or realise too late that something is becoming unstuck --when it comes to:
• Housing, Land and Property Rights
• Land Access
• Tenure Security
Some help is at hand…
• A network of different international rights-based instruments
• A history of trainings focused on HLP
• Upcoming Resources Guide, developed by the ESC HLP Working Group
But,
• There is often not enough practical guidance for implementing according to international principles
• The rule of law doesn’t stretch very far in some places
• Intractable HLP problems do not respect project deadlines
• We are not always the answer to the problem
Some preliminary suggestions 1:
• Map all of the locally applicable tenure-security instruments
• On a range of ‘soft’ to ‘hard’, and ‘efficient’ to ‘non-efficient
• Including ‘customary’ and ‘formal’
• Decide which set of instruments you will engage with
• Why these ones?
• What are the pros and cons?
• What are the risks?
• What is the Plan B?
Some preliminary suggestions 2:
• Think: all aspects of The Right To Adequate Housing
• Think: Individual -- and Community
• Think: the relationship between HLP and engineering
Some preliminary suggestions 3:
• First, Do No Harm
• Humanitarians are not always the answer
• ‘How to take NO for an answer’
• ‘Customary law works, until something changes’
• How to help people cope with the problem, rather than solving the problem for them?
Questions or comments?