nowcasting thunderstorm intensity from satellite
DESCRIPTION
Robert M Rabin NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory Norman, OK USA Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies University of Wisconsin Madison, WI USA. Nowcasting Thunderstorm Intensity from Satellite. Outline. Purpose The first pictures (1960's) TIROS - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Nowcasting Thunderstorm Intensity from Satellite
Robert M Rabin
NOAA/National Severe Storms LaboratoryNorman, OK USA
Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite StudiesUniversity of Wisconsin
Madison, WI USA
Outline
● Purpose● The first pictures (1960's) TIROS
– Basic cloud structure, Environmental conditions ● GEO arrives (1970's) ATS and GOES
– Time rate of change, anvil expansion– More structure, Enhanced-V
● Multispectral (1990's) AVHRR and GOES– Plumes, near storm environment
● Outlook for the future
Purpose
● Review past discoveries in relation to radar.● Explore prospects for operational severe storm detection.
The First Pictures
TIROS-I
27 May 1960, 1719 LST
from: L. Whitney
JAM 1963:
Severe Storm Clouds
as seen from TIROS
From: L. F. Whitney, 1963, JAM, figure 3
●Clouds are “conspicuous and distinctive”
●Medium size, not linear
●Highly reflective, combined anvils
●Sharp edges, scalloped structure
●Much larger than area of radar echoes and sferics
●Contiguous clear areas, useful in determining severity?
Relationships between size of cirrus shields and severity
R.J. Boucher 1967, JAM
TIROS IV-VII
17 cases1962-1964
From: Fig. 2
From Fig. 3, Boucher 1967, JAM
●Diameter of cirrus shield is an index of storm severity:
rarely severe < 60 n mi
usually severe > 150 n mi
●Penetrative convection: not always severe weather
●Contiguous clear areas not common
●Results based on a limited sample of cases
Satellite imagery and severe weather warnings
James F.W. Purdom, 1971
Polar orbiting: NOAA-1
●Squall lines: characteristic appearance, narrowing to south
●Locations of jets: polar and subtropical
●Shear with height: thermal ridge and amount of veering
ATS-3 Visible imagery (1971): 11-minute updates on demand
●Early detection of squall lines as compared to radar
●Isolation of areas under threat for severe weather:
often southern portion of convective clusters
●Growth of anvil:
pause in expansion linked time of tornado occurrence
McCann(1979) linked collapsing tops to downdraft
and tornado formation
Convective Initiation
Some uses of high-resolution GOES imagery in the mesoscale forecasting of
convection and its behavior
James F.W. Purdom, 1976 MWR
●Detection of mesoscale processes: important for storm initiation and maintenance
Effects of terrain (coast lines, rivers and lakes)
●Precise location of convective (outflow) boundaries
●Merging and intersecting of boundaries
●Given favorable conditions:
New convection and intensification
Exploration of Infrared imagery
Anvil outflow patterns as indicators of tornadic thunderstorms
Charles E. Anderson, 1979
Observed characteristics of cirrus plumesof severe storms (limited cases)
Displaced to the right of the ambient windAnticyclonic rotationSpiral bandsSimilarity to hurricanes
On overshooting-collapsing thunderstorm tops
Donald W. McCann, 1979
●Previously observed by aircraft (Fujita, 73;Umenhofer, 75)
●Collapse does NOT cause tornado
●May be related to acceleration of gust front:
occlusion of mesolow
strong surface outflow (i.e. bow echo)
Thunderstorm intensity as determined from satellite data (SMS 2: IR 5-minute)Robert Adler and Douglas Fenn, JAM 1979
●Tornadoes during or after rapid expansion (7 of 8)
●Statistical relation to severe weather:Severe storms: colder and more rapid growth
●Potential warning lead time: 30 minutes
●Divergence and vertical velocity:Twice as large for severe storms
●Limitations: Results from a single dayExisting anvil may obscure new storm growthStorm top heights underestimated as compared to radar
Mesoscale convective complexesRobert Maddox, 1980 BAMS
●Identified unique class of convective system
●Defined from IR imagery
cold cloud tops (< -32 C)
size (> 100,000 km**2)
shape: circular (eccentricity > 0.7)
duration: > 6 hours
●Produce wide variety of severe weather
●Difficult to forecast
weak upper-level support
low-level warm advection
Observations of damaging hailstorms from geosynchronous satellite digital data
(GOES 30-minute data: 9 storms)
David W. Reynolds, 1980 MWR
●Cloud tops colder than tropopause
Infer vigorous updrafts
●Expect better relation for hail
tornadoes: depend on boundary layer conditions●Large hail storms
long lasting (3-5 h)large, high cloud tops
●Onset of large hailrapid vertical growthcloud top becoming colder than tropopause
●Requires proper enhancement
The enhanced-V: a satellite observable severe storm signature
Donald W. McCann 1983, MWR
●Relatively large sample: 884●Interaction of winds and overshooting tops
strong upper level wind (20-60 m/s)●Many severe storms do not have enhanced-V
POD is low ( .25 )Cause of enhanced-V needs more research
●FAR similar to other methods (.31)
●Lead time of 30 minutes
●Requires proper enhancement
Detection of severe Midwest thunderstormsusing geosynchronous satellite data
SMS-2 and GOES-1: ~5 minute data
Robert Adler, Michael Markus, Douglas FennMWR 1985
●Combine parameters into single index ●Index correlated with severe weather and max reflectivity
parameters related to updraft intensitycloud top ascent ratesexpansion rates of isotherms
based on 4 dependent, 1 independent case
●V-shape with embedded warm spot
similar to McCann findings●Limitations
identification of cloud tops during certain stagesresolution in IR (cloud tops too warm)ambiguity in height from cloud top temperature
Thunderstorm cloud top dynamics as inferred fromsatellite observations and a cloud top parcel model
Robert Adler, Robert Mach, 1986 JAS
●Used GOES stereoscopic observations (May 1979)
●Three classes of storms identified and simulated
1. concentric: monotonic temperature-height
Cold-warm couplet with coldest and highest point
2. collocated: isothermal
3. offset: inversion with mixing
●“Close in” warm point: subsidence undershooting
Upper-level structure of Oklahoma tornadic stormson 2 May 1979, I: Radar and satellite observations
Gerald Heymsfield, Roy Blackmer, Steven SchotzJAS, 1983
●Three severe storms investigated (single day)
●“V” pattern of low cloud top temperature
strong divergence●Close-in warm area:
10-20 km downwindmoves with storm motion
forms at time of tropopause penetrationsubsidence mechanism proposed
●Distant warm area (not in all cases) 50-75 km downwindmoves with upper-level windsNo visible stratospheric cirrus
●Rapid growth stage
cold areas collocated with radar echo●After rapid growth
cold areas sometimes displaced from echo core
●IR temperature change
not always consistant with stereographic height change
Satellite-observed characteristicsof Midwest severe thunderstorm anvils
Gerald Heymsfield, Roy Blackmer, MWR 1988
●Statistics from several cases (9)
●Thermal couplets
second distant warm point often observed
width of V: spacing of cold and distant warm
T-diff (warm-cold): related to amount of overshoot
●Ingredients for “V”
Strong shear near troposphere
Intense updrafts and overshooting tops
●Various hypotheses
internal cloud dynamics
radiative transfer effects
flow over and around storm top: waves
combination of above
●Limitations
IR pixel resolution
unknown temperature and ice crystal structure
complexity of multistorm structure
3-D models too simplified
Aircraft overflight measurements of Midwestsevere storms: Implications on
geosynchronous satellite interpretations
Gerald Heymsfield, Richard Fulton, James
Spinhirne, MWR 1991
●Dimensions of overshooting topssize of single GOES pixel15 degs colder
●Thermal couplets: much more pronounced●Warm areas: not due to variation in optical depth●Above cloud wind and temperature perturbations
cold dome in temperature field
The AVHRR channel 3 cloud topreflectivity of convective storms
Martin Setvak, Charles Doswell, 1991 MWR
●Areas of enhanced reflectivity at 3.7 microns
convective cell: widespread or localized
plume-like: less common
●Association with hail (limited sample)
●Not often associated with “V”
●Possible cause
very small ice crystalsgenerated from vigorous updrafts
Passive microwave structure of severe tornadic storms on 16 November 1987
Gerald Heymsfield, Richard Fulton, 1994 MWR
●Maximum polarization difference at 86 Ghz
correlates with internal warm region
convective core:
symmetrical or tumbling ice particles
small polarization difference
warm region:
oriented ice crystals
large polarization difference
●Microphysical variations
partially explain IR structure
Multispectral high-resolution satellite observations of plumes on top of convective
storms
Vincenzo Levizzani, Martin Setvak, 1996 JAS
●Enhanced reflectivitySmall ice crystalslimited growth time: strong updraft (BWER)vertical lifting/gravitational settling
●Vertical separation between plume and anvil
●Different from Fujita's (1982) stratospheric cirrus
●Link between plume source position and warm spot
Satellite observations of convective storm tops in the 1.6, 3.7 and 3.9 spectral bands
Martin Setvak, Robert Rabin, Charles Doswell,
Vincenzo Levizzani, 2003 Atmos. Res.
●Study used GOES and Doppler radar
●Areas of high cloud top reflectivity
time scales: minutes to hourssize: pixels to entire anvilslinked to mesocyclone formationmove downwind once formednot always associated with mesocyclones
●Mechanisms remain unknown
Moisture plumes above thunderstorm anvils and their contributions to cross-tropopause
transport of water vapor in midlatitudesPao Wang, 2003, JGR
●Storm simulated using 3-D, non-hydrostatic model
●Water vapor source: shell of overshooting dome
●Gravity waves
●Waves break when instability becomes large
●Water vapor injected into stratosphere
●Carried downwind in shape of a chimney plume
●Transport of water vapor to stratosphere: 3 tons/sec
Nowcasting storm initiation and growthusing GOES-8 and WSR-88D dataRita Roberts, Steven Rutledge, 2003 WF
●Based on observed cloud growth rates
eastern CO (4 days),
Washington DC and New Mexico (2 days)
●Onset of storm development
surface convergence features
gust fronts, rolls, terrain, intersecting features
cloud tops reaching sub-freezing altitudes
rapid cooling of cloud tops
●Intensity related to rate of cooling
●Increased lead time
15 minutes prior to 10 dBZ echoes aloft
30 minutes prior to 30 dBZ echoes aloft
NCAR automated nowcasting system
NCAR auto-nowcast systemCindy Mueller et al, 2003, WF
●Provides short-term (0-1 hr) nowcasts of storm location
●Identify boundary layer convergence lines
●Fuzzy logic to combine predictor fields
radar, satellite, meosnet, profilers, models
●Improves over extrapolation and persistence
tested at 3 locations (3 years)
plans to include in NWS AWIPS
Validation and use of GOES sounder information
Tim Schmit, et al., 2002 WF
●Thermodynamic stability parameters
CAPE, CIN, PW
hourly updates for time trends
horizontal resolution (10 km)
only available in clear areas
●Subjective use in forecast offices
●Limited use in NWP
Storm trackerA Web-based tool for monitoring MCS
Robert Rabin, Tom Whittaker 2004
●Identify and track MCS
cold cloud tops
radar reflectivity
adjustable thresholds●Time trends of MCS characteristics
size
cloud top temperature
radar reflectivity
lightning
storm environment from RUC,...●Real-time and archived data on-line●Data access from NOMADS/THREDDS catalog
Data Flow
GOES
Radar
RUC model analysis
THREDDS
LightningTrackingAlgorithm Web Server
Example session:
Summary
●40 year history of satellite research
●Hot research topic through 1980's
●Limits to Operational use of early ideas
advent of Doppler radar network
resolution limitations
limited early access
●Greatest impact: qualitative use of imagery
The future?
● MSG (now)
● AWIPS
● GOES-R (2013)