november, 2009 brazil’s new oil & gas regulatory framework the pre-salt’s four bills of law...
TRANSCRIPT
November, 2009
Brazil’s new Oil & Gas Regulatory Framework
The Pre-salt’s four Bills of Law
Luiz Antonio Maia Espínola de [email protected]
Informações Confidenciais de Propriedade de TozziniFreire Advogados
Summary
I. The world’s major legal-regulatory regimes
II. Historical background of Brazilian regulatory
framework
III. Overview of the Bills of Law proposed by
President Lula
IV. Legal and economic constraints in the proposed
regulatory framework
V. Trends
I. The world’s major legal-regulatory regimes
Informações Confidenciais de Propriedade de TozziniFreire Advogados
Main Characteristics of each regime
OC holds title over the hydrocarbons State’s Remuneration by means of Tax + Royalties Full risk of the OC Government as regulator
Concession
State is the original title holder over the production Cost oil and profit oil Full risk of the OC, with the recovery of the cost oil in the discovery Government as regulator / NOC executes the PSA
ProductionSharing
State holds title over the production NOC contracts and remunerates the OC for the operation State’s risk NOC executes the Services Agreement
ServicesAgreements
State and OC both hold title over the production State’s Remuneration by means of Tax + Royalties Risk shared between the Government and the OC Government as regulator / NOC with active participation
in the Joint Venture
Joint Venture
Informações Confidenciais de Propriedade de TozziniFreire Advogados
Geographic Distribution of the different legal-regulatory regimes
Brazil
Mexico
USA
Norway
Angola
Nigeria
Russian Federation
Saudi Arabia Indonesia
Venezuela
Concession
Joint VentureMostly Concession / PSA
ServicesPSA
PSA/ServicesMultiple
Adopted Regimes:
Concession/PSA
Abu Dhabi (United
Arab Emirates)
Source: Wood Mackenzie, Deutsche Bank, Bain & Company, TozziniFreire Advogados
II. Historical background of Brazilian regulatory framework
Informações Confidenciais de Propriedade de TozziniFreire Advogados
Historical Background – From State Monopoly to the Pre-Salt Discoveries
Opening of the market to private OCs and establishment of the Concession regime 72 OCs operating in Brazil Increase in the number of oil industry service providers (2000 – 210 / 2008 – 1761) National oil production increased by more than 75% Growth of 300% in the oil industry Participation in GDP increased from 2.8% in 1997 to 10% in 2008
1997 – 2009Incredible progress of the
Brazilian E&P Industry
1995 – Constitutional Amendment1997 – Petroleum Law
Flexibilization of the Monopoly
Until 1995 Petrobras’ Full Monopoly Petrobras’ platform P-51
Source: Petrobras
Informações Confidenciais de Propriedade de TozziniFreire Advogados
The New Regulatory Framework Background
2006 - Discovery of potentially massive reserves in the pre-salt area
2008 - Government creates a task force to issue recommendations for a new regulatory framework
2009 - The President submits the Bills of Law to Congress
2007 - Suspension of the 8th Bid round 2008 - 41 pre-salt sites removed from the 9th Bid round
Task force recommends the adoption of PSAs, and drafts the four Bills of Law
Informações Confidenciais de Propriedade de TozziniFreire Advogados
The Pre-salt area
Oil
Ocean2 km
Post-salt2 km
Salt3 km
Pre-salt2 km
Espírito Santo Basin
Campos Basin
Santos Basin
Estimated reservesTupi Field: 5 to 8 billion boeIara Field: 3 to 4 billion boe
Pre-salt area
Brazil
Source: Petrobras
Source: Folha de São Paulo
Informações Confidenciais de Propriedade de TozziniFreire Advogados
Brazilian pre-salt numbers
Pre-salt area: around 149.000 km2
Area under concession: (28%) of which:with Petrobras partic. – 35.739 km2 (24%) without Petrobras partic. – 6.003 km2 (4%)Area not auctioned: 107.228 km2 (72%)
Source: Petrobras
III. Overview of the Bills of Law proposed by President Lula
Informações Confidenciais de Propriedade de TozziniFreire Advogados
The Pre-Salt Bills of Law
Bill Number Scope
5941/09 Capitalization of Petrobras
5939/09 Creation of a State-Owned Company – Petro-Sal
5940/09 Creates the Social Fund
5938/09 Adoption of the Production Sharing Agreements
Informações Confidenciais de Propriedade de TozziniFreire Advogados
New Brazilian Regulatory Framework
Pre-salt and other
Strategic areas
Remaining areas
Current Concession regimeremains applicable
DirectAssignment
ProductionSharing
Agreement
Up to5 billion boe
No changes shall be made in the areas already under Concession,even those included in the Pre-salt area
100%Direct
Negotiation
Bidding Process
Min.30%
Max70%Bid winners
Source: Petrobras
Informações Confidenciais de Propriedade de TozziniFreire Advogados
Federal Union subscribes shares equivalent to the Economical value of the oil reserves
(first 5 billion BOE to be exploited)
Bill of Law 5941/09 – Capitalization of Petrobras
FEDERALUNION
Assignment of non auctioned pre-salt areas
Payment (Federal Bonds)
Petrobras CorporateCapital Increase
PETROBRAS
Payment in cash by interested minority
stockholders
DIRECT ASSIGNMENT
Informações Confidenciais de Propriedade de TozziniFreire Advogados
Bill of Law 5939/09 – Creation of PETRO-SAL
Public Company – Integrally owned by the Federal Union
Does not perform E&P activities Does not take part in marketing activities Does not make investments Does not assume any risks
PETRO-SAL
Manages the PSAs and hydrocarbons commercialization contracts in relation to the Government’s share of the Profit Oil
Informações Confidenciais de Propriedade de TozziniFreire Advogados
Bill of Law 5938/09 – PSA – The division of cost oil and profit oil in Brazil
Production Sharing Agreement in Brazil
Cost Oil Royalties and, when in land, third parties’ participation Contracted
Oil Companies
Federal Union
Special Participation (based on the production volume)
Profit oil division
Profit Oil
Informações Confidenciais de Propriedade de TozziniFreire Advogados
Bill of Law 5938/09 – PSA – Brazilian key players
PETROBRAS
Production Sharing Main Players
PETRO-SALANP OIL COMPANIES
Operator in all PSA Blocks
Minimum participation of30% in all PSA Blocks
May be directly contracted by the Government
Participates in all PSA Blocks by means of
Consortium
Holds 50% of the seats inthe Operation Committees
Elects the OPCOM’spresident, who has
casting vote and veto powers
Acts as the Government’s Regulating Body
Analyses and approvesExploration and
Development Plans
Drafts the PSAs andBid Tender Protocols
Participation limited to 70%
Participate solelyas investors
Innocuous Participation inOPCOM’s decisions
Informações Confidenciais de Propriedade de TozziniFreire Advogados
Bill of Law 5938/09 – PSA – Unitization Issues
Unitization Lacks Due Regulation
WHICH RULES SHALL BE APPLICABLE FOR THE UNITIZED FIELD?
Areas under PSA rulesX
Areas under Concession rules
Areas under Concession rulesX
Areas in the pre-salt area notcurrently under Concession nor PSA
Informações Confidenciais de Propriedade de TozziniFreire Advogados
Bill of Law 5938/09 – PSA – 11 different Unitization Possibilities
Concession vs Concession
Parties: Concessionaire A and Concessionaire B
PSA vs PSA
Parties: PSA Contractor A and PSA Contractor B
Concession vs PSA
Parties: Concessionaire and PSA Contractor
Concession vs Non-auctioned areas under
Concession
Parties: Concessionaire and Federal Union
(represented by ANP)
PSA vs Non-auctioned areas under PSA
Parties: PSA Contractor and Federal Union
(represented by PETRO-SAL)
Concession vs Areas directly assigned to
Petrobras
Parties: Concessionaire and Petrobras
PSA vs Areas directly assigned to Petrobras
Parties: PSA Contractor and Petrobras
Concession vs Non-auctioned areas under PSA
Parties: Concessionaire and Federal Union
(probably represented by PETRO-SAL)
PSA vs Non-auctioned areas under Concession
Parties: PSA Contractor and Federal Union
(represented by PETRO-SAL)
Non-auctioned areas under PSA vs Areas
directly assigned to Petrobras
Parties: Federal Union (represented by PETRO-SAL)
and Petrobras
Non-auctioned areas under Concession vs
Areas directly assigned to Petrobras
Parties: Federal Union (represented by PETRO-SAL)
and Petrobras
IV. Legal and economic constraints in the proposed regulatory framework
Informações Confidenciais de Propriedade de TozziniFreire Advogados
Bill of Law 5938/09 – PSA – Constitutional Issues
Mandatory Participation of Petrobras
Direct Contracting of Petrobras
PETROBRAS as Sole Operator
Free initiative, free competition, isonomy, economicity, impersonality, duty to bid and e the free practice of economical activity
General Natural Resources constitutional provision grants title over the production to the Producers
Federal Union Holds Title Over The Production
Unitization of Blocks Under Concession
Legal Security, Vested Rights
Informações Confidenciais de Propriedade de TozziniFreire Advogados
Main conflicts in the proposed Regulatory Framework
Cost Oil
In Brazil, rendering of services maybe subject to taxation (e.g. ISS)
Which operations shall be accounted? Cost-oil calculation needs detailed ruling.
PSA tax implications in Brazil
Corporate Governance - PETRO-SAL does notassume risks or make investments
PETRO-SAL’s powers in the Operational Committee
Unitization conflicts Unbalanced penalties
Petrobras’ capitalization conflictsAssignment waiving bidding procedure;Federal Union, as majority shareholder,
should decline to vote the appraisal report
Bills of Law delegate some key aspects ofthe regulation to future Acts of the Executive
Informações Confidenciais de Propriedade de TozziniFreire Advogados
Petrobras as PSA’s Sole Operator
Integrated program for the acquisition of goods
and services
Standardization of the technical requirements
for equipments and materials
Only one Company for the acquisition of goods
and services
No competition impairs development and
expertise exchange between IOCs
PROS
CONS
Fields with smaller productivity may be
left aside
Constraints to the development of
technology by the service providers
Lack of attractiveness of the Brazilian PSA regime
for IOCs and new Brazilian OCs
Informações Confidenciais de Propriedade de TozziniFreire Advogados
Brazilian PSA Operational CommitteePETRO-SAL
PETRO-SAL(representing the
Federal Union)and Bid Winners
50% of the seats 50% of the seats
Indicates theOpCom Chairman
OPERATIONAL COMMITTEEChairman Powers
Casting vote
Veto power
the deciding vote cast by the Chairman to resolve a tie
the power to cancel or deny a particular voting procedure
V. Trends
Informações Confidenciais de Propriedade de TozziniFreire Advogados
Trends
Regardless of the regime adopted, the acquisition of goods and services should grow considerably;
• Huge Volume of investments
• Local Content will be crucial
Although the new regulatory framework does indirectly restrict foreign investments, there are still good opportunities for services providers;
The result of 2010’s elections may influence the outcome of the proposed regulatory framework
• Oil Industry representatives are attempting to improve the Bills of Law by furnishing political parties with information regarding the Oil Industry
Trends
Even if approved in the Congress, the Bills of Law shall still be subject to a constitutional analysis by the Supreme Court