not for sale tanzania procurement journal...mashauri zao ili waweze kuchukua hatua stahiki. akijibu...

ISSN: 1821 - 6021 Vol VI - No. 19 May 7, 2013 Free with Daily News every Tuesday

Tanzania

Procurement Journal

INSI

DE

Tanzania

Procurement Journal

Tanzania

Procurement Journal

www.ppra.go.tzNOT FOR SALE

Procurement JournalProcurement Journal

Procurement opportunities

page ... 3

Procurement audit reports

page ... 6

Awarded contracts

page ... 8

Procurement Journal

One of the functions of the committee responsible for planning and

finance in a council is to oversee project implementation through

monitoring of works and goods received.Did you know ?

Minimum number of days for bidders to prepare and submit theirbids in a tender where large works are involved. 90

Forensic audit crucial for efficient use of resourcesP

rocurement forensic audit is a vital

tool that public bodies could use to

investigate inefficient use of

resources, it has been revealed.

Speaking during the workshop on Pro-

curement Forensic Audit which was

organized by the Procurement and Sup-

plies Professionals and Technicians Board

(PSPTB) in Arusha recently, Senior Super-

intendent of Police (SSP), Suleiman

Nyakulinga, said forensic audit - a blend

of traditional accounting, auditing, and

financial detective work, helps identify

fraud and persons responsible for it.

“The main aim of its use is to find out

whether true business value has been

reflected in the procurement process,

whether any fraud has taken place, and the

audit can beneficially be applied in other

areas where due diligence is required to be

carried out,” he said.

SSP Nyakulinga reiterated that forensic

procurement audit is used to describe a

wide range of investigative work with pro-

curement crime investigators into procure-

ment affairs of an alleged procuring entity.

He said the objective is to relate findings

of audit by gathering legally tenable evi-

dence and in so doing; the corporate veil

may be lifted to identify fraud and persons

responsible for it.

He said forensic audit aims at legal deter-

mination of whether fraud has actually

occurred. “It also aims at naming the cul-

prits for purposes of taking legal action,”

he added. He also said that the audit pro-

vides a sound base of factual information

that can be used to help resolve disputes as

well as facilitating court proceedings.

The workshop, which attracted 47 partici-

pants from public and private sectors, cov-

ered among others, conceptualization of

A group of participants to the training on Procurement Forensic Audit conducted inArusha recently.

forensic audit, procurement audit method-

ology, investigation on corruption in pro-

curement and misappropriation of public

funds. Other topics included tracking and

collection of procurement forensic audit

information as well as the role of PPRA

and PCCB in procurement forensic audit.

PPRA has once again reminded

procuring entities to always pub-

lish contract awards, it has been

learnt.

The reminder is a result of the find-

inds from the procurement audit

which was conducted by PPRA

between April and August, 2012.

According to the report, Ileje Dis-

trict Council and Nelson Mandela

African Institute of Science and

Technology failed to publish con-

tract awards thereby contravening

the Public Procurement Act, 2004.

The audit report for Ileje District

Council points out that the entity

failed to submit notification of con-

tract awards to PPRA for publica-

tion on its website and this Journal,

contrary to Regulation 97 (12) and

(13) of the GN. No. 97 of 2005.

In the case of Nelson Mandela


Technology, the entity failed to dis-

close to the public the results of

contracts awarded in the financial

year 2011/12 and did not submit

copies of notification of contract

awards to PPRA contrary to the

above cited Regulation.

Furthermore, the report for the

institute says that unsuccessful bid-

ders were not notified of names of

successful bidders that it had

entered into procurement contracts

with, contrary to Reg. 97(11) of GN

97 of 2005.

In view of the observed shortfalls,

the two entities were advised to

ensure that contract award informa-

tion is submitted to PPRA for pub-

lication on its website and the Jour-

nal and the same disclosed to the

public through newspapers of wide

circulation.

The overall performance for Ileje

District Council was 54 percent

while that of Nelson Mandela


Technology was 53 percent.

The summarized procurement

audit reports for the above two

entities begin on page 6.

PPRA reminds entities to publish contract awards

22 Tanzania Procurement JournalTuesday, Sept 29, 20092 Tanzania Procurement Journal Tuesday December 28, 2010Tanzania Procurement Journal Tuesday May 7, 2013

PROCUREMENT NEWS

Wazabuni wanaoshiriki kwenye

michakato mbalimbali ya zabuni

zinazoitishwa na taasisi nunuzi

wametakiwa kuzingatia utaratibu ulioanish-

wa kwenye sheria ya ununuzi na kanuni

zake wakati wanapowasilisha malalamiko

yao dhidi ya maamuzi yanayofanywa na

taasisi hizo katika mchakato wa zabuni.

Hayo yamesemwa na Bibi Bertha Soka,

Mkuu wa Idara ya Sheria na Mahusiano ya

Umma ya PPRA, wakati akihojiwa na Jari-

da hili kuhusu utaratibu wa kuwasilisha

malalamiko iwapo mzabuni hajaridhika na

mchakato wa zabuni. Akifafanua zaidi,

mkuu huyo wa idara alisema kwamba kwa

mujibu wa sheria ya ununuzi wa umma,

mzabuni anapowasilisha malalamiko dhidi

ya maamuzi kwenye mchakato wa ununuzi,

anapaswa kufafanua taratibu zilizokiukwa

kwenye mchakato wa zabuni, na pia kifun-

gu au vifungu vya sheria vilivyokiukwa na

kwa namna gani.

Aliendelea kubainisha kwamba katika

jukumu lake la kusimamia ununuzi wa

umma nchini, PPRA imegundua kuwa

baadhi ya wazabuni huwasilisha

malalamiko yao bila kuzingatia utaratibu

uliowekwa kisheria. “Hali hii imechangia

kuleta athari katika utekelezaji wa miradi

mbalimbali kwa wakati, pamoja na

ucheleweshaji wa upatikanaji wa huduma

zinazolenga jamii,” alilisitiza Bibi Soka.

Aliendelea kusema, “Malalamiko

hushughulikiwa katika ngazi tatu, ambapo

ngazi ya kwanza huanzia kwa afisa masuuli,

asiporidhika mlalamikaji huweza kupeleka

malalamiko yake katika ngazi ya pili

ambayo ni PPRA, na iwapo hataridhika na

maamuzi hayo, mlalamikaji atawasilisha

rufaa yake Mamlaka ya Rufani za Zabuni

(PPAA).”

Akifafanua zaidi kuhusu athari hizo, Bibi

Soka alisema kwamba kuna mazingira

ambayo baadhi ya maafisa masuuli

hushughulikia malalamiko ya wazabuni

kwa kujibu hoja zote za mlalamikaji kwa

kiwango cha kuridhisha. Hata hivyo, baad-

hi ya walalamikaji wamekuwa hawaridhiki,

na hivyo kuendeleza mlolongo wa

malalamiko kuhusu suala moja tu ambalo

pengine lingeweza kutolewa ufafanuzi kwa

utaratibu uliowekwa kisheria na hivyo

kuruhusu mchakato wa zabuni kuendelea.

Mkuu huyo wa idara aliendelea kubainisha

kwamba baadhi ya malalamiko yame-

onekana kuwa ya msingi na hatua stahiki

kuchukuliwa dhidi ya taasisi husika. Hata

hivyo, kuna baadhi ambayo yamedhihirika

kutokuwa ya msingi lakini kwa kuwa

mzabuni ana haki ya kulalamika ambayo

amepewa kisheria, hutumia fursa hiyo kuen-

deleza mlolongo wa malalamiko bila

kutambua athari zinazoweza kujitokeza.

Aliendelea kusema kwamba miradi inay-

otakiwa kutekelezwa au huduma zinazo-

takiwa kutolewa ni kwa faida ya jamii kwa

ujumla, ucheleweshaji wa utekelezaji wa

miradi au ucheleweshaji wa huduma

huweza kuleta athari zinazogusa wengi.

Aidha, kwa miradi inayotegemea fedha za

wafadhili inaweza pia kupoteza ufadhili huo

kwa taasisi husika kushindwa kutekeleza

miradi hiyo kwa wakati.

Katika kuhitimisha mahojiano na Jarida hili,

Bibi Soka amewataka wazabuni kutumia

haki yao ya malalamiko vizuri na kwa

mujibu wa sheria ili kuepuka athari zili-

zoelezwa hapo juu. Aidha, alitoa wito kwa

wazabuni kushirikiana na taasisi nunuzi

pamoja na PPRA katika kuhakikisha kwam-

ba ununuzi wa umma unaleta thamani halisi

ya fedha iliyotumika.

Wazabuni watakiwa kuzingatia sheria wanapowasilisha malalamiko

Mojawapo ya majukumu ya kamati inayohusika na masuala ya mipango na

fedha ni kufuatilia utekelezaji wa miradi ya ujenzi na bidhaa zinazowasilishwa

kwenye halmashauri.Je wajua?

Idadi ya siku wanazopewa wazabuni kuandaa nakuwasilisha zabuni zao kwenye zabuni ambayoinahusisha miradi mikubwa ya ujenzi.

90

Mameya na wenyeviti wa hal-

mashauri nchini wameiomba

PPRA kuendelea kutoa

mafunzo kuhusu sheria ya ununuzi wa

umma na kanuni zake kwa wakurugenzi

na wakuu wa idara za halmashauri

pamoja na madiwani ili kuwajengea

uwezo katika utekelezaji wake.

Hayo yalisemwa na mameya na

wenyeviti wa halmashauri nchini

walipohudhuria mafunzo ya sheria ya

ununuzi wa umma na kanuni zake mjini

Morogoro hivi karibuni. Washiriki hao

waliiomba PPRA kutoa mafunzo hayo

mara kwa mara kwa madiwani na waten-

daji wa halmashauri kupitia ofisi za

kanda ambazo PPRA inatarajia kufungua

katika mikoa ya Dar es Salaam, Mbeya,

Arusha, Mwanza na Dodoma.

Aidha, washiriki hao walikuwa na

maoni kwamba utaratibu uliowekwa na

sheria mpya ya ununuzi wa umma ya

mwaka 2011 wa kuwataka madiwani

kupitia mapendekezo ya utoaji tuzo kwa

mshindi wa zabuni uangaliwe upya

baina ya PPRA na TAMISEMI.

Walipendekeza kwamba endapo

wajumbe wa Kamati ya Fedha

hawataridhia mapendekezo ya tuzo,

watoe hoja au maoni na kumrudishia

mkurugenzi mtendaji afanyie kazi hoja

hizo. Iwapo mkurugenzi hatakubaliana

na hoja hizo, awasilishe hoja hiyo PPRA

waweze kufanya uchunguzi.

Washiriki pia waliiomba PPRA kuhakik-

isha kuwa wanawapatia nakala madi-

wani taarifa za uchunguzi wa ununuzi

zilizofanywa na PPRA kwenye hal-

mashauri zao ili waweze kuchukua hatua

stahiki.

Akijibu hoja za washiriki, Afisa

Mtendaji Mkuu wa PPRA, Dk.

Ramadhan Mlinga, aliwajulisha kuwa

PPRA imeyachukua mapendekezo yao

na itayafanyia kazi. Aidha, aliendelea

kusema kwamba ili sheria ya ununuzi

ilete matokeo yanayotarajiwa lazima jiti-

hada zifanyike kuhakikisha kuwa viten-

go vya ununuzi vinaimarishwa kwa

kuwa na watumishi wenye elimu na

ujuzi unaotakiwa pamoja na nyenzo za

kufanyia kazi.

Dk. Mlinga aliendelea kusema kuwa

ununuzi wa umma utaleta matokeo

yanayotarajiwa iwapo watendaji wa

umma wanaohusika na ununuzi

watakuwa waadilifu na wazalendo kwa

kuweka maslahi ya umma mbele badala

ya maslahi binafsi. “Suala lingine

muhimu linaloweza kuleta ufanisi katika

ununuzi wa umma ni kuongeza uwazi

kwa lengo la kuepusha vitendo vya rush-

wa kwenye ununuzi,” alisema.

Afisa Mtendaji Mkuu wa PPRA alisisiti-

za kuwa kila taasisi nunuzi ihakikishe

ina mpango wa ununuzi wa mwaka

unaoendana na bajeti na kuhakikisha

kuwa unafuatwa kikamilifu. “Ni lazima

taasisi nunuzi zihakikishe ufuatiliaji wa

karibu wa utekelezaji wa mikataba ikiwa

ni pamoja na kuwachukulia hatua wale

wote ambao watathibitika kukiuka she-

ria,” aliongeza.

Halmashauri zijengeweuwezo - Madiwani

TAARIFA KWA UMMAMamlaka ya Udhibiti wa Ununuzi wa Umma (PPRA)katika mkakati wake wa kujenga

ubia na umma kuhusu masuala ya ununuzi, itaendelea kurusha vipindi vya kuelimisha

umma kuhusu sheria ya ununuzi wa umma. Ratiba ya kurusha vipindi hivyo ni kama ifu-

atavyo:

•Kila Jumatano stesheni ya Star TV kuanzia saa 1.00 mpaka saa 1.30 jioni;

•Kila Ijumaa stesheni ya ITV kuanzia saa 1.00 mpaka saa 1.30 jioni; na

•Kila Jumamosi stesheni ya TBC1 kuanzia saa 3.00 mpaka saa 3.30 usiku

PPRA inawaalika wote kuangalia vipindi hivi ili kuweza kupata uelewa wa sheria ya

ununuzi wa umma. Aidha, Mamlaka ingependa kupata maoni yako kuhusu vipindi hivyo

na jinsi ya kuviboresha.

Iwapo una maoni tafadhali wasiliana nasi kupitia anwani ifuatayo:

Afisa Mtendaji Mkuu,

Mamlaka ya Udhibiti wa Ununuzi wa Umma,

S.L.P. 49, Dar es Salaam

Nukushi: +255 22 2121238; Barua pepe: [email protected]

Tuesday December 21, 2010 Tanzania Procurement Journal 3

GOODSProcuring entity: Dar es Salaam Water and

Sewerage Corporation

Tender No: AE/032/2013 - 2014/HQ/G/01

Tender Name: Supply of Water Treatment

Chemicals.

Lot 1: Polymer Blend.

Lot 2: Disinfectants Case 1.

Lot 3:Disinfectants Case 2.

Lot 4: Poly Aluminum Chloride (PAC)

Powder.

Lot 5: Aluminum Sulphate.

Lot 6: Soda Ash.

Source of Fund: Government of Tanzania

Eligible Firms: National

Method of Procurement: NCB

Price of Bid Document: Tshs. 50,000

Contact Address: The Secretary TB, Dar es

Salaam Water and Sewerage Corporation,

P.O. Box 5340, Dar es Salaam

Deadline: 12th June 2013, 14:00 hours

Procuring entity: Dar es Salaam Water and

Sewerage Corporation

Tender No: AE/032/2013 - 2014/HQ/NC/01

Tender Name: Provision of

Telecommunication Service.

Directors - Post Paid 6, Staff - Prepaid - 31,

Staff - Prepaid - 93





Contact Address: The Secretary TB, Dar es

Salaam Water and Sewerage Corporation,



Procuring entity: Meatu District Council

Tender No: LGA/110/2012-13/G/01

Tender Name: Supply of Water Treatment

Chemicals. Calcium Hypochlorite 36,000kg

Granule Concentration 65-75 Percentage.

Aluminum Sulphate 1,080kg Concentration

65-75Percent





Contact Address: The Secretary TB, Meatu

District Council P.O. Box 44, Meatu

Deadline: 29th May 2013, 12:00 hours

Procuring entity: Tanzania Ports Authority

Tender No: AE/016/2012-13/CTB/G//14

Tender Name: Supply and Commissioning

of one 10,000 Liters Water Bowser for

Mtwara Port





Contact Address: The Secretary TB,

Tanzania Port Authority, P.O. Box 9184, Dar

es Salaam


Procuring entity: Government Procurement

Services Agency

Tender No: AE/005/HQ/2012/2013/G/4

Tender Name: Supply of Computers,

Servers, Fax Machines, Printers,

Consumables, External Storage Facilities

and other ICT Equipment






Government Procurement Services Agency,



Procuring entity: Vocational Education and

Training Authority

Tender No: PA/024/2012/13/HQ/G/39

Tender Name: Supply of Motor Vehicles






Vocational Education and Training

Authority, P.O. Box 2849, Dar es Salaam


Procuring entity: Ministry of

Communication, Science and Technology

Tender No: ME/06/2011-12/STHEP/G/02

Tender Name: Supply for Installation and

Commissioning of OPTIC Fiber Cable

(OFC) and Related Civil Works for Higher

Leaning and Research Institutions (HERIS)

in Tanzania in

Lot 3: for Morogoro and Zanzibar HERIs.

Lot 4: Iringa and Mbeya HERIs.

Lot 5: Kilimanjaro HERIs.


Eligible Firms: National and International

Method of Procurement: NCS



Ministry of Communication, Science and

Technology, P.O. Box 2645, Dar es Salaam


Procuring entity: Government Procurement

Services Agency

Tender No: AE/005/HQ/2012/2013/G/05

Tender Name: Procurement of Gas Oil and

Premium Motor Gasoline (Unleaded)






Government Procurement Services Agency,



Procuring entity: Tanzania Institute of

Education

Tender No: PA/070/2012-13/G/07

Tender Name: Printing of

Lot 1: Syllabi.

Lot 2: Syllabi Guides for Primary School.





Contact Address: The Secretary, Tanzania

Institute of Education TB, P.O. Box 35094,

Dar es salaam


Procuring entity: Ministry of Energy and

Minerals

Tender No: ME/008/2012-13/SMMRP/G/33

Tender Name: Supply of

Lot 1: Gemological Laboratory Equipment.

Lot 2: Environmental Laboratory

Equipment.

Lot 3: Reference Textbooks.






Ministry of Energy and Minerals, P.O. Box

2000, Dar es Salaam


Procuring entity: Ministry of Energy and

Minerals

Tender No: ME/008/2012-13/SMMRP/G/32

Tender Name: Supply of Geophysical

Equipment for State Mining Corporation.

Lot 1: Magnetometers, Resistivity/ Ip

Equipment, Gamma Ray

Spectrometer.

Lot 2: Global Positioning System (GPS),

Compass.






Ministry of Energy and Minerals, P.O. Box

2000, Dar es Salaam


WORKSProcuring entity: Kigoma/Ujiji Water

Supply and Sanitation Authority

Tender No: KUWASA/TB/4/2013

Tender Name: Works for Construction of

150m3 Water Tank and Auxiliary Works






Kigoma/Ujiji Water Supply and Sanitation

Authority, P.O. Box 812,Kigoma

Deadline: 22nd May 2013, 10:00 hours

Procuring entity: Meatu District Council

Tender No: LGA/110/2012-13/W/08-13

Tender Name: Works for Completion of 4

Class Rooms at for

Lot 1: Mwandoya Secondary School and

Construction of Toilet of 8 Stances.

Lot 2: New Laboratory at Mwandoya

Secondary School.

Lot 3: New Laboratory of Mwandoya

Secondary School.

Lot 4: Completion of 3 Classrooms at

Mwamishali Secondary School and

Construction of Toilet of 8 Stances.

Lot 5: Laboratory at Mwamishali Secondary

School.








Procuring entity: Babati Town Council

Tender No:


Fence and Guard House of Babati Town

council Headquarters Building





Contact Address: The Secretary TB, Babati

Town Council, P. O. Box 383, Babati


Procuring entity: Ministry of Home Affairs

Tender No: ME 014/2012/2013/W/02

Tender Name: Proposed Construction of

Idete Prison Irrigation Scheme in Kilombero

District for Tanzania Prisons Service

Department






Ministry of Home Affairs, P.O. Box 9223,

Dar es Salaam

Deadline: 31st May 2013, 10:00 hours

Procuring entity: Tanzania Electric Supply

Company Limited

Tender No: PA/001/13/NZN/W/005-3

Tender Name: Works for

Tender 05: Mojor Repair to Roof Structure

at Pangani Hydro Plants.

Tender 03: Renorvation of Tanga Region

Building.






Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited,



This section provides summaries of open tender opportunities in Procuring Entities (PEs). More details of the tenders may be found on PPRA web-

site www.ppra.go.tz. Prospective bidders are required to confirm the information provided hereunder or seek further details from respective PEs.

PROCUREMENT OPPORTUNITIES

Tuesday December 28, 2010 Tanzania Procurement Journal 3Tuesday May 7, 2013 Tanzania Procurement Journal 3

Continues on page 4


PROCUREMENT OPPORTUNITIES

Procuring entity: Tanzania National Roads

Agency

Tender No: AE/100/2012/13/HQ/W/ 54


Weighbridge Station Including Supply and

Installation of a Brandy New Weighbridge

Scale at Kubiterere ( Sirari) in Mara Region






Tanzania National Roads Agency, P.O. Box

11364, Dar es Salaam


Procuring entity: Tanzania National Roads

Agency

Tender No: AE/001/2013/2014/MB/W/01-

04, 07,11,14,17,19,22-25,27 - 25,27-45

Tender Name: Works for Spot Improvement,

Periodic, Routine and Recurrent

Maintenance, Rehabilitation Works and

Bridge Major Repairs for Trunk and

Regional Roads in Mbeya Region






Tanzania National Roads Agency. P. O. Box

258, Mbeya


CONSULTANCYProcuring entity: Tanzania National Roads

Agency

Tender No: AE/100/2012/13/HQ/C/ 127

Tender Name: Consultancy Service for

Feasibility Study, Detailed Engineering

Design and Preparation of Tender

Documents for Upgrading of Nyahua -

Chanya Road 985.4Km) to Bitumen

Standard



Method of Procurement: NCS

Price of Bid Document: N/A


Tanzania National Roads Agency, P.O. Box

11364, Dar es Salaam


NON - CONSULTANCYProcuring entity: Meatu District Council

Tender No: LGA/110/2012-13/NCS/01

Tender Name: Provision of Revenue

Collection on Livestock Market








Procuring entity: National Insurance

Corporation of Tanzania

Tender No: PA/069/HQ/2013/NC/01

Tender Name: Provision of Printing Services

for Various NIC Documents





Contact Address: The Secretary TB, National

Insurance Corporation of Tanzania, P.O. Box

9264, Dar es Salaam


Procuring entity: Njombe Town Council

Tender No: LGA/134/REV/2013 -2014

Tender Name: Provision for Revenue

Collection at Various Sources Within

Njombe Town Council





Contact Address: The Secretary TB, Njombe

Town Council, P.O. Box 577, Njombe

Deadline: 3rd June 2013, 10:00 hours

DISPOSALProcuring entity: National Social Security

Fund

Tender No: PA/004/2012-13/HQ/D/03

Tender Name: Provision of Leasing or

Purchase of Fund’s Property Located Near

Leader’s Club in Kinondoni District Area

Dar es Salaam





Contact Address: The Secretary TB, National

Social Security Fund, P.O. Box 1322, Dar es

Salaam


Continued from page 3

Editorial Board of TanzaniaProcurement Journal

Dr. Laurent M. Shirima... Chairman

Mr. Christopher E. Mwakibinga...Vice Chairman

Mrs. Bertha H. Soka ... Member

Mr. Awadhi J. Suluo ... Member

Eng. Eva M. Lupembe ... Member

Mrs. Coleta D. Mnyamani ... Secretary

Eng. Nestor H. Ilahuka ... Editor

TPJ is published by PPRA every Tuesday

Contacts:

Public Procurement Regulatory Authority

(PPRA), PPF Tower, 8th Floor,

PO Box 49, Dar es saalam.

Tanzania

Tel: +255 22 2121236;

Fax: +255 22 2121238;

email: [email protected];

Website: www.ppra.go.tz

JAMHURI YA MUUNGANO WA TANZANIA

WIZARA YA FEDHA

WAKALA WA HUDUMA YA UNUNUZI SERIKALINI (GPSA)

TANGAZO

MWALIKO WA MAFUNZO JUU YA MFUMO WA UNUNUZIWA PAMOJA WA VIFAA NA HUDUMA MTAMBUKA KWA

KUTUMIA MIKATABA MAALUMU

Wakala wa Huduma ya Ununuzi Serikalini umeandaa mafunzo kwa

watendaji wa Taasisi za Umma ili kuwaongezea weledi katika utumi-

aji Mfumo wa Ununuzi wa Pamoja wa Vifaa na HudumaMtambuka kwa kutumia Mikataba Maalum.

Mafunzo yatatolewa katika maeneo yafuatayo:-

• Sheria mpya ya Ununuzi wa Umma Na.7 ya mwaka 2011

• Mfumo wa Ununuzi wa Pamoja wa Vifaa na Huduma Mtambuka

kwa mujibu wa Sheria Mpya ya Ununuzi wa Umma

• Matumizi ya Mikataba Maalum na wajibu wa pande zinazohusika

• Matumizi ya mtandao katika kupata na kutoa taarifa

Mafunzo haya yataendeshwa katika mikoa ifuatayo:-

Walengwa wa mafunzo haya ni Maafisa Ununuzi na Ugavi,Watumishi katika Kitengo cha Ununuzi (PMU), Wajumbe wa Bodiya Zabuni, Wakuu wa Shule za Sekondari/Vyuo, Wajumbe waKamati za Shule za Sekondari, Maafisa Elimu, Wahakikimalipamoja na Wakaguzi wa Hesabu za Serikali.

Kila mshiriki anatakiwa kulipa ada ya mafunzo ya shilingi300,000.00 kwa Mtendaji Mkuu, Wakala wa Huduma ya UnunuziSerikalini, S.L.P 9150, Dar es Salaam kwa njia ya hundi za benki au

fedha taslimu katika akaunti za CRDB – Na. 01J1095100500 auNMB – Na. 2011000064 au katika ofisi zetu za mikoa.

Angalizo:Washiriki/mshiriki atakayelipia kupitia benki ahakikishe

‘’Bank Pay in Slip’’ yake anaiwasilisha katika Ofisi ya GPSA MakaoMakuu Dar es salaam iliyopo Mtaa wa Bohari – Barabara yaNyerere au katika ofisi zetu za mikoa ili aandikiwe Hati ya Malipo(ERV) kwa lengo la kujua idadi kamili ya washiriki kwa ajili ya

kufanya maadalizi na kupeana taarifa.Tafadhali zingatia ili kuepuka

usumbufu.

Imetolewa na

Mtendaji Mkuu,Wakala wa Huduma ya Ununuzi Serikalini [GPSA]

S.L.P 9150, Dar es Salaam.Simu: +255 22 2861617/2866072

Nukushi: +255 22 2866072Barua pepe: [email protected]

Tovuti: www.gpsa.go.tz

MKOA KITUO CHA MAFUNZOWASHIRIKI WAMAFUNZO

TAREHE YAMAFUNZO

Mtwara UKUMBI WA HALMASHAURI MIKOA YOTE

15/05/2013 -

17/05/2013

Iringa UKUMBI WA VETA MIKOA YOTE

29/05/2013 -

31/05/2013

Mwanza UKUMBI WA VETA MIKOA YOTE

05/06/2013 -

07/06/2013

DSM MSIMBAZI CENTRE MIKOA YOTE

19/06/2013 -

21/06/2013

Tuesday December 21, 2010 Tanzania Procurement Journal 5

PROCUREMENT NEWS

Tuesday December 28, 2010 Tanzania Procurement Journal 5Tuesday May 7, 2013 Tanzania Procurement Journal 5

PROCUREMENT AND SUPPLIES PROFESSIONALS ANDTECHNICIANS BOARD

PUBLIC NOTICE

TWO DAYS WORKSHOP ON PROCUREMENT FORENSIC AUDITING (PFA)

Place: MOROGORO

Venue: HILUX HOTEL

Date: 16th to 17th May, 2013

OverviewDue to the increased demand and requests from our stakeholders, PSPTB

has decided to re-run the workshop on Procurement Forensic Auditing

(PFA). The workshop will be conducted for two days starting from 16th to

17th May 2013. The workshop is an intensive one and will take participants

to both theoretical and practical skills on procurement forensic auditing.

Some case studies will be presented and discussed to give participants the

insights of procurement auditing.

Workshop Programme (Contents)• Conceptualization of Procurement Forensic Auditing

• Procurement Audit methods

• Investigation for Procurement Forensic Auditing

• Procurement corruption and misappropriation

• PFA evidence

• Tracking and collection of Procurement Forensic Auditing evidence

• The role of PPRA and PCCB in Procurement Forensic Auditing

Who should attend? • Procurement Officers and Managers

• Procurement Auditors

• Supplies Officers

• Stock Auditors

• Logistics officers

• Stock controllers

• Internal Auditors

• Stores personnel

• Heads of functional departments

• Any interested individuals

COURSE FEE:Tshs. 400,000/= per participant to cover for tuition, training materials,

tea/coffee and lunch. Payment should be done through our NBC Corporate

Branch A/C No. 0111 0301 7252 or NMB House Branch A/C No.

2013500374.

For further details contact:

Executive Director,

PSPTB,

P.O. Box 5993,

DAR-ES-SALAAM.

Tel. No. 255-22-2865860

Fax. No. 255-22-2862138

E-mail: [email protected]

Website: http://www.psptb.go.tz

PROCUREMENT AND SUPPLIES PROFESSIONALSAND TECHNICIANS BOARD

PUBLIC NOTICE

THREE DAYS WORKSHOP ON ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS

OF SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT

Place: TANGA

Venue: BANDARI CONFERENCE HALL, TPA TANGA

Date: 29th to 31st May, 2013

OverviewThe workshop intends to equip participants with knowledge and

skills of acquiring, retaining and managing reliable relationships

with both prospective and current sources of supply.

Who should attend?• Procurement and Supplies staff

• Suppliers

• Warehouse/ Store staff

• Members of Tender Boards

• Members of PMU

• User departments and stores personnel

• Human Resource Management staff

• Any interested people

Workshop (Programme) Contents• Conceptualization of supplier relationship

• Types of relationships in business environment

• Maintaining ethics in Business relationships

• Unauthorized behavior in business relationships

• Win-win relationships and supplier development focus

• Ethics and Integrity in business relations.

COURSE FEE:Tshs. 400,000/= per participant to cover for tuition, training mate-

rials, tea/coffee and lunch. Payment should be done through our

NBC Corporate Branch A/C No. 0111 0301 7252 or NMB House

Branch A/C No. 2013500374.

For further details contact:

Executive Director,

PSPTB,

P.O. Box 5993,

DAR-ES-SALAAM.

Tel. No. 255-22-2865860

Fax. No. 255-22-2862138

E-mail: [email protected]

Website: http://www.psptb.go.tz


PROCUREMENT AUDIT REPORTS

1.0 ILEJE DITRICT COUNCILThe audit was conducted between April and

August 2012. This audit covered procure-

ment amounting to 1,519,275,711 of which

Goods amounted to Tsh. 464,076,710.34,

Works Tsh. 345,630,199.63 and Non-Con-

sultancy services Tsh. 710,000,000 which

had been processed by the time of the audit.

Overall compliance of Ileje District Council

was 54% using 13 indicators. The scores for

the 13 indicators were as follows; Establish-

ment and composition of TB (50%), Estab-

lishment and composition of Procurement

Unit (PMU) (85%), Functioning of

Accounting, Tender Board, Procurement

Management Unit and User department

(74%), Preparation and adherence to annual

procurement plan(APP) (61%), Approvals

(88%), Advertisement of bid opportunities

(70%), Publications of awards (0%), Time

for preparation of bids(1%), Method of pro-

curement (1%), Use of standard tender/con-

tract documents (85%), Record keeping

(76%), Quality assurance (36%) and Con-

tract implementation (81%).

Key Findings1. Establishment and composition of

Tender Board: The Tender Board at

Ileje District Council (IDC) was estab-

lished and composed of seven members

in accordance to Sec. 28 of PPA 2004,

read together with 2nd schedule of PPA

2004. The establishment and composi-

tion of TB complied with section 28 (1)

and (2) of the PPA 2004. However, TB

members have no knowledge and were

not trained in use of PPA of 2004 and its

Regulations. PPRA was not notified on

the composition of the tender board and

their qualification pursuant to sec. 29(1)

of the PPA of 2004.

The score on establishment and com-

position of TB is 50%.

2. Establishments and composition of

Procurement Management Unit

(PMU): Procurement Management Unit

had been established in compliance with

section 34 of the PPA 2004. PMU had

one 1 permanent staff. PMU had Techni-

cal staff with expertise in other areas of

specialization in Health, Supplies, Civil

technician, Accountant pursuant to Sec-

tion 34 of PPA 2004; PMU had adequate

office space provided with one computer

and one printer. However PMU had no

secretary and was operating as a commit-

tee contrary to Section 34 of PPA 2004.

The score on establishment and com-

position of PMU is 85%.

3. Functioning of Accounting Officer, TB

and PMU: Accounting Officer per-

formed all responsibilities as per Section

33 of the PPA, 2004. However, the AO

did not staff PMU to an appropriate level

and did not appoint contract manager for

works contracts reviewed. Furthermore

AO issued adverts without being

approved by tender board. Tender Board

also exercised powers and performed

most of responsibilities pursuant to sec-

tion 30 of PPA 2004. PMU also per-

formed its responsibilities according to

section 35 of PPA 2004; However PMU

did not prepare monthly reports for the

Tender Board; did not co-ordinate the

procurement and disposal activities of all

the departments of the procuring entity.

The score on functioning of AO, TB

and PMU is 74%.

4. Preparation of and adherence to

Annual Procurement Plan (APP):

Annual Procurement Plan for financial

year 2011/2012 was prepared using

appropriate templates issued by PPRA.

However, only one template for internal

use was prepared. There were no proper

arrangements of TB and Committees’

meetings. All packages were assigned

same number for all tenders in APP con-

trary to guidelines issued by PPRA. APP

did not consolidate like categories of

goods, works or services that were to be

procured. Some of procurements imple-

mented were not shown in the APP to

maximize economy and efficiency in its

procurement as required under Regula-

tion 48 of GN No. 97 of 2005.

The score on preparation of and

adherence to APP is 61%.

5. Approvals: TB approved recommenda-

tions of award and shortlist of suppliers

and service providers. However; advert

and tender documents; contract docu-

ments, negotiation team and negotiation

plans, were not approved by TB. Minor

value procurements of contracts amount-

ing to Tshs. 1,143,769,710 had no

endorsement of the Secretary of the TB

and at least two members of the TB con-

trary to Regulation 68(5) of GN 97 of

2005.

The score on approvals is 88%.

6. Advertisement of Bid Opportunities:

Based on reviewed tenders advertise-

ments were made publicly in accordance

with Section 61(3) of PPA of 2004 and

Regulation 80 (1) of GN No. 97. Howev-

er, tender opportunities were not submit-

ted to PPRA to be published in its Web-

site and Journal.

The score on advertisement of Bid

Opportunities is 70%.

7. Publication of Awards: No publication

of award was submitted to PPRA for

publication in the PPRA’s website and in

the Tanzania Procurement Journal con-

trary to Regulation 97 (12) and (13) of

the GN. No. 97 of 2005.

The score for publication of award is 0 %.

8. Time for preparation of Bids: It was

observed that planed contracts were

given adequate time as required by Sec-

ond Schedule and Regulation 84 (1) of

GN 97 of 2005. This represent 1.4% of

tenders give adequate preparation time.

The score for preparation of Bids is 1%.

9. Method of Procurement: It was

observed that procurement methods pro-

posed in the 2011/12 APP complied with

threshold in third Schedule of Reg. GN

97 of 2005. However in the implementa-

tion only six (6) NCB and one (1) CQ for

goods were implemented using methods

proposed in the APP. All other tenders

for goods proposed to be procured

through NCB, CQ, NS, SS, FA, FWC,

were procured by using MV. There was

no explanation for deviation from the

proposed methods. Only 1.4 % tenders

were correctly implemented using cor-

rect method.

The score on method of procurement is

1%.

10.Use of standard tender/contract docu-

ments: Invitation for bid was prepared

with minimum contents according to

Reg. 81 GN 97 of 2005. Bid data sheet

was properly amended; technical specs

were properly made for works contracts.

Most of Goods contracts were not pro-

cured using standard documents.

Schedule of requirements was well pre-

pared for works contracts only. However,

evaluation reports were prepared using

non-standard documents, analysis of the

reports revealed missing standard tables,

absence of detailed evaluation of essen-

tial equipment, and personnel qualifica-

tion of technical staff. Annual procure-

ment plan was prepared in standard tem-

plate.

The score on use of standard

tender/contract documents is 85%.

11.Record Keeping: There was no contract

file with all necessary attachments; PE

had most of the procurement processing

documents, however the documents were

scattered in deferent files. Bids submitted

by bidders were not attached except for

MV contracts, some personal covenants

for evaluation attached in different files.

Brief of TB minutes were compiled in

TB minutes file.

The score on records keeping is 76 %.

12.Quality assurance: Inspection and

acceptance committee were not appoint-

ed by AO for all contracts reviewed con-

trary to Regulation 121 (2) of GN No. 97

of 2005; there was no Acceptance and

inspection reports prepared for goods

received contrary to Regulation 126 and

127 of GN No. 97 of 2005. Works con-

tracts were supervised by Council’s

Engineer. Appointment letter for Project

Manager/ Supervisor and no quality

assurance plan were prepared. Though

there were BOQs and works specifica-

tions, there were no checklists for testing

for quality verification. There were no

Tests certificates for tests performed as

per specifications; however there were

minutes of Site management meeting

held as per terms and conditions of con-

tract; however no monthly progress

report prepared as well as was no Final

inspection reports with snag list pre-

pared.

The score for quality assurance is

36%.

13.Contract implementation: During Site

Visit for Contract no

LGA/078/IDC/RF/2011/12/04 for Spot

Improvement of Ileje Town Roads. The

team observed that contractor had per-

formed work as per terms and condition

of contract. The AT however observed

that total distance length of road con-

structed was 5.8km instead of 6.0 km as

per contract agreement. It was difficult to

identify specific streets worked on

because they were not identified in the

bidding by names or drawings. There

were no Contractual certificates or inter-

im certificates, practical completion and

defect liability period certificate availed.

The score on contract implementation

is 81%.

RecommendationsIn view of the above observations, the pro-

visions of the PPA 2004 and its Regulations

made under it, the PE should adhere to and

attention should be on the following recom-

mendations:-

a) AO officer should ensure that tender

board members are trained in PPA 2004

and its Regulations and notification on

Tender Board Establishment should be

sent to PPRA.

b) PMU need to be staffed to appropriate

level pursuant to Sec. 34 of PPA 2004.

c) Tender Board should perform all its

responsibilities pursuant to Sec.30 of

PPA 2004. PMU should maintain inde-

pendence while performing all its respon-

sibilities pursuant to Sec. 35 of PPA

2005.

d) PMU should ensure that APP is prepared

with all its versions as per PPRA direc-

tives, that Packages should be numbered

so as to differentiate each tender from

another with regard to categories and

numerical numbers. PMU should ensure

that the timescale for each procurement is

calculated on the basis of the standard

processing times prescribed in the Third

Schedule to the Regulations, allowing

any necessary margin for delays in trans-

mission of documents or clarification of

tenders. From the time scale, the start

dates and critical points in the procure-

ment process should be set out in the pro-

curement plans.

e) TB should ensure that advert and tender

documents get necessary approval.

f) IDC should ensure all open tenders are

advertised and the same submitted to

PPRA for publication in its website, and

PPRA Journal

g) IDC should ensure that tender awarded

are disclosed to the public through news-

papers of wide circulations, and the same

submitted to PPRA for publication in its

website and its Journal

h) IDC should ensure that bidders given suf-

ficient time to respond to invitation to bid

pursuant to schedule 3rd part (c) of

Reg.GN 97 of 2005.

i) PMU should ensure adherence to planned

methods in the APP when implementing

procurement contracts.

j) PMU should make sure that all tendering

documents used standard tender process-

Procurement audit for FY 2011/12

Continues on page 7

Tuesday December 21, 2010 Tanzania Procurement Journal 7Tuesday December 28, 2010 Tanzania Procurement Journal 7Tuesday May 7, 2013 Tanzania Procurement Journal 7

PROCUREMENT AUDIT REPORTS

ing documents issued by PPRA.

k) PMU should ensure that approved draft

advert and bidding document, tender doc-

ument issued to bidders are attached,

Minutes of tender opening; tender open-

ing register; readout prices; tender open-

ing checklist are attached, Evaluation

report with Signed covenant form are

attached in the specific procurement file.

l) IDC should ensure that Inspection and

acceptance reports should be prepared for

all procurement contracts implemented,

Project works manager should be

appointed for all works contracts pur-

suant to Reg. 121 GN of 2005. Supervi-

sors should ensure that quality assurance

plan is in place for Works contracts, there

should be checklists for testing for quali-

ty verification and intervals/stages.

m)IDC should ensure that tests are per-

formed as per specifications, Site man-

agement meetings are held as per terms

and conditions of contract, Monthly

progress report are prepared, Final

inspection reports with snag list are pre-

pared pursuant to Reg. 128 GN 97 of

2005.

n) AO should appoint contract manager

/supervisor for all contract works and

should advertise and issue approved doc-

ument.

2.0 THE NELSON MANDELA

AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF SCI-

ENCE AND TECHNOLOGYThe scope of the audit covered all tenders in

categories of Goods, Non Consultancy and

Consultancy Services for the FY 2011/2012.

The audit covered procurements amounting

to T.shs 296,345,995.00 for Goods; and

T.shs 379,000,192.00 for non-consultancy

services. Two Tenders for consultancies

services were at the evaluation stage there-

fore the award was not yet done.

Overall Compliance of the Nelson Mandela

African Institute of Science and Technology

(NM-AIST) was 53% using 13 indicators.

The scores for 13 indicators were as fol-

lows; Establishment and Composition of

Tender Board [45%]; Establishment and

Composition of PMU [82%]; Functioning

of AO, Tender Board and PMU [70%];

Preparation of Annual Procurement Plan

[0%]; Approvals [50%]; Advertisement of

Bid opportunities [50%]; Publication of

awards [0%]; Time for preparation of bids

[100%]; Method of Procurement [30%];

Use of Standard Tendering Documents

[100%]; Records keeping [50%]; Quality

Assurance [34%]; Contract implementation

[75%].

Key Findingsa) Establishment and composition of

Tender Board: The audit team observed

that contrary to the requirement under

section 28 and Second Schedule of PPA

No 21 of 2004, the TB established at the

NM-AIST is composed of five members

instead of six. Furthermore, the Authori-

ty was not notified about the establish-

ment contrary to section 29 (1) of PPA

No 21 of 2004. It was also observed that

tender board members have not attended

training on PPA No 21 of 2004 and its

regulations.

Score is 45%.

b) Establishment and Composition of

Procurement Management Unit: It was

observed that the Accounting Officer has

established Procurement Management

Unit. However the unit is not appropri-

ately staffed as required under section

34(2) of PPA No 21 of 2004. It was also

noted that the HPMU has the right quali-

fication and reports directly to the AO.

But the administrative staff was not allo-

cated to support the functions of the Unit.

Score is 82%.

c) Functioning of Accounting Officer,

Tender Board and PMU: It was

observed that there was some interfer-

ence between the individual functions

contrary to section 38 of PPA No 21 of

2004. The accounting officer approved

negotiation teams instead of tender

board. Most of the procurements were

done by user department without

involvement of PMU.

Score is 70%.

d) Preparation of Annual Procurement

Plan: It was observed that the Annual

Procurement Plan has not been prepared

at the Nelson Mandela African Institute

of Science and Technology contrary to

Section 45 of PPA, 2005.

Score is 0%.

e) Approvals: It was observed that shortlist

of suppliers for shopping method of pro-

curement were not approved by the ten-

der board contrary to regulation 68 (2) of

GN 97 of 2005 and advert, tender docu-

ments as well as negotiation plan was not

approved by the tender board as required

by regulation 95(13) of GN 97 of 2005.

However, the procuring entity did not

adhere with the approval procedures of

minor value procurements as stipulated

under the first schedule of GN no. 97 of

2005 which required endorsement of at

least two members of the tender board.

Score is 50%.

f) Advertisement of bid Opportunities:

All open tenders were properly adver-

tised in accordance with Regulation

80(5) of GN. No 97 of 2005, however,

the PE did not submit the advert to the

Authority to be published in the Journal

& website.

Score is 50%.

g) Time for Preparation of Bids: It was

observed that bidders were provided with

adequate time to prepare and submit their

bids as stipulated under the Third Sched-

ule of GN. No 97 of 2005.

Score is 100%.

h) Publication of Award: The team

observed that the PE did not disclosed to

the public the results of contracts award-

ed in the year 2011/2012 and did not sub-

mit copies of notification for awards to

PPRA as required by Regulation

97(12&13) of the GN No. 97 of 2005

which requires the PEs to submit to ten-

ders awards decision to PPRA within

three (3) days from the date of decision.

Also unsuccessfully bidders were not

notified as required by Reg. 97(11) of

GN 97 of 2005.

Score is 0%.

i) Methods of Procurement: It was

observed that due to the lack of procure-

ment plan the PE used minor value pro-

curement method as a default method to

most of the procurement done which was

not properly administered according to

the threshold contrary to first and second

schedule of GN 97 of 2005.

Score is 30%.

j) Use of Standard Bidding Documents:

The AT noted that PMU used Standard

Bidding Document prepared and issued

by PPRA as stated in Regulation 83 (3)

of GN No. 97 of 2005.

Score is 100%.

k) Record Keeping: It was observed that

procurement records were not consoli-

dated in proper way as required by Sec-

tion 56 of PPA No 21 of 2004, read

together with regulation 19(1) of GN 97

of 2005. The contracts examined have no

complete records from contract initiation

to the end.

Score is 50 %.

l) Quality Assurance: It was evidenced

that the accounting officer did not

appoint inspection and acceptance teams

contrary to regulation 127 of GN 97 of

2005. Also there was no supervisors for

non-consultancy services, quality assur-

ance plan as well as no progressive

reports was prepared for the non-consul-

tancy services contrary to regulation 123

of GN 97 of 2005. It was also observed

that the PE did not implement any work

contract during the year under review

and consultancy service contracts were

still on progress.

Score is 34%.

m)Contract Implementation: It was

observed that there were no progressive

reports prepared for the non consultancy

services, some of the services were

implemented without the binding con-

tract and suppliers were not paid on time.

There was evidence that some of goods

were delivered and delivery note evi-

denced, and consultancy service contract

is still in progress.

Score is 75%.

RecommendationsIn view of the above observations, the pro-

visions of the PPA 2004 and its Regulations

made under it, the PE should adhere to and

attention should be on the following recom-

mendations:-

a) The AO should establish the TB as per

the requirement stipulated under section

28 and the second schedule of PPA No 21

of 2004 by appointing six members

instead of five to comply with second

schedule (b) of PPA No 21 of 2004.

b) The Accounting Officer should make

sure that tender board members are

trained on PPA No 21 of 2004 and its reg-

ulation GN 97 of 2005, GN 98 of 2005.

c) The Accounting Officer should make

sure that PMU is staffed at an appropriate

level to comply with section 34 of PPA

No 21 of 2004.

d) Accounting Officer, TB, and PMU

should act independently as per require-

ments under section 38 of PPA No 21 of

2004. 2004.

e) The PE should prepare the Annual Pro-

curement Plan as required by section 45

of PPA No 21 of 2004 and adhere to use

of the template and guidelines issued by

PPRA.

f) Tender board should approve all procure-

ment including minor value procurement

as required by first schedule of GN 97 of

2005.

g) Minor value procurement should follow

proper methods as required by regulation

68(1) of GN 97 of 2005 and first sched-

ule of GN 97 of 2005.

h) The tender board should make sure that it

approves the negotiation teams and plans

and not the Accounting Officer.

i) All shortlist of supplier’s should be

approved by the tender board to comply

with regulation 68 (2) of GN 97 of 2005.

j) PMU should make sure that it performs

all its functions as per the requirement of

section 35 of PPA No 21 of 2004.

k) The PE should make sure that award

decisions are publicly known to comply

with regulation 97 (11&13) of GN 97 of

2005.

l) All tenders should have consolidated file

which have all necessary documents as

outlined in the score sheet and as required

by section 56 of PPA No 21 of 2004 read

together with regulation 19(1) of GN 97

of 2005.

m)Accounting Officer should make sure

whenever there is an incoming goods he

appoints goods and acceptance commit-

tee to inspect goods and write the report

which will be used as the basis to certify

payment, and also should appoint super-

visor to supervise the non-consultancy

contracts as per the requirement of regu-

lation 127 and 123 of GN 97 of 2005

respectively.

n) The PE should make sure that before the

consultant, contractor and any service

provider is engaged to any activity there

must a signed contract to bind the two

parties which will specify the terms and

conditions of the contract.

Continued from page 6

Procurement audit for FY 2011/12


AWARDED CONTRACTS

Name of PE Tender No. Tender description Firm awarded Currency and

amount(Tsh)

Date of

award

Ministry of

Health and

Social

Welfare

Quotation Printing of Public

Expenditure Review

2011 Books

M/S Mamco

Printers Co.

Ltd

8,700,000.00 13/11/2012

Quotation Printing of STI

Recording and

Reporting Tools

M/S Shalloom

Business

Agency Co.

79,409,132.00 31/12/2012

Quotation Printing of various

Books

M/S Brilliant

Print Ltd

30,800,000.00 18/12/2012

Quotation Printing of Books M/S Dar es

Salaam

University

Press

25,967,080.00 10/12/2012

Quotation Printing of various

Books

M/S Mamco

Printers Co.

Ltd

27,900,000.00 10/12/2012

Songea

Municipal

Council

LGA/103/2012

/2013/W/06 -

Package II

Periodic, Spot and

Routine Maintenance

of various Roads

within Songea

Munucipality

M/S Quid Pro

Quo Co Ltd

134,571,280.00 21-01-2013

LGA/103/2012

/2013/W/05-

Package I

Periodic and Routine

maintenance of

varoius Roads within

Songea Municipality

M/s Pa General

Traders

58,240,100.00 21-01-2013

LGA/103/2012

/2013/W/13-

Package IX

Spot Improvement

and Routine

Maintenance of

varoius Roads within

Songea Municipality

M/s Mpemba

and Sons Ltd

64,636,950.00 21-01-2013

LGA/103/2012/

2013/W/07-

Package III

Periodic, Spot and

Routine Maintenance

of varoius Roads with-

in Songea

Municipality

M/s Mlando

Workshop Ltd

74,391,100.00 21-01-2013

LGA/103/2012

/2013/W/08-

Package IV

Periodic, Spot and

Routine Maintenance

of varoius Roads

within Songea

Municipality

M/s Masukacha

Enterprises Ltd

135,302,950.00 21-01-2013

LGA/103/2012

/2013/W/09-

Package V

Periodic, Spot and

Routine Maintenance

of varoius Roads

within Songea

Municipality

M/s Mkongo

Building and

Civil Works

Ltd

49,665,080.00 21-01-2013

LGA/103/2012/

2013/W/10-

Package V1

Periodic, Spot and

Routine Maintenance


in Songea

Municipality

M/s Patty

Interplant Ltd

69,217,280.00 21-01-2013

LGA/103/2012/

2013/W/11-

Package VII

Spot Improvement and

Routine Maintenance


in Songea

Municipality

M/s Matunda

Garden INN

Ltd

42,573,020.00 21-01-2013

LGA/103/2012/

2013/W/12-

Package VIII

Spot Improvement and

Routine Maintenance


in Songea

Municipality

M/s Msifaki

Engineering &

ENT Ltd

35,856,329.00 21-01-2013

Higher

Education

Students'

Loans Board

PA/030/2012-

2013/NC/27

Short listing of appli-

cants for Management

position

Resource

Development

and

Management

Associates

(REDMA)

18,350,000.00 30-01-2013

Ministry of

Water

ME-011/2011-

2012/W/05-Lot

5

LINDI Water Supply

and Sanitation project

M/S Overseas

Infrastructure

alliance Ltd

23,709,442,294.26 08/01/2013

Dar es

salaam

Stock

Exchange

Quotation Office Partition Work M/S Arqes

Africa Ltd

12,835,450.00 20/03/2012

Office Partition Work M/S Namis

Corporate Ltd

150,265,504.64 20/03/2012

Name of

PE

Tender No. Tender description Firm awarded Currency and

amount

Date of

award

Morogoro

District

Council

Quotation Routine maintenance

works along Gomero-

Nyarutanga and Spot

Improvement works

along Sesenga-

Lumbachini Road

Section

M/S Mono

Construction

Company Ltd

52,583,200.00 30-11-2012

Quotation Routine and recurrent

Maintenance works

along Mkambarani -

Kizinga 14 km Road

Section

M/S Victoria

Earth Plan

13,300,000.00 30-11-2012

Quotation Routine maintenance

works along

Chamanyani-Tununguo

and Mvuha-Magogoni

Road sections

M/S Gida

Company ltd

37,600,000.00 30-11-2012

Periodic Maintenance

works along Dakawa -

Bwakira Juu Road

Sections

M/S Simac

Construction

Ltd

88,170,000.00 30-11-2012

Quotation Routine amd Recurrent

Maintenance works

along Tawa- Kibogwa

6km Road Section

M/S Kimofema

Engineering and

Trading Co ltd

8,580,000.00 30-11-2012

Quotation Routine amd Recurrent

Maintenance works

along Magera-Seregete

''A'' 13km and Kwaba

Usungura 22km Road

Sections

M/S Decra

Company Ltd

46,995,000.00 30-11-2012

Quotation Routine improvement

works along Ngerengere-

Sinyaulime and Ubena

Zomozi-Ngerengere

Road Sections

M/S Nyakire

investment ltd

43,995,000.00 30-11-2012

Prime

Minister's

Office

ME-

003/PMO/G/02/201

2/2013-Lot 2

Supply of bulky printing

papers and consumables

M/S Printers

Supplies Ltd

780,841,400.00 24/01/2013

ME-

003/PMO/02/2012/

2013/HQ/G/08

Supply of Power

Stabilizing Device

M/S Pamba

Electrical Works

74,860,000.00 24/01/2013

ME/003/PMO/G/01

/2012-2013

Supply spare parts for

printing machines and

equipment

M/S High Tech

Systems (T) Ltd

799,089,510.00 24/01/2013

ME-

003/PMO/G/02/201

2/2013-Lot 1

Supply of bulky printing

papers and consumables

M/S Tanzania

Printing

Services Ltd

800,000,000.00 24/01/2013

Business

Registratio

ns and

Licensing

Agency

(BRELA)

AE/010/2012/13/H

Q/G/010- Lot 1 &

III

Printing of Booklets,

Brochures, Fliers, T-

Shirts, Caps, Diaries and

Calendars

M/S T/a Karen

General Supply

16,171,900.00 09/11/2012

Morogoro

District

Council

Quotation Spot improvement works

along Mkambarani-

Mkorio Wa Mara 8km

Road

M/S Bumao

contractors and

general supplies

48,385,000.00 30-11-2012

Construction of Water

Supply System

M/S Kimofema

Engineering and

Trading co ltd

170,793,011.00 30-11-2012

Quotation Spot improvement worksalong Tandai-Tawa Road

M/S No dreadco ltd

34,700,000.00 30-11-2012

Quotation Rehabilitation ofTegetero-MagogoniRoad

M/S Fyosa com-pany ltd

67,148,000.00 30-11-2012

Quotation Spot improvement worksKangazi-Mtombozi -Nemele Road Section-9km

M/S Nabawyconractors ltd

49,240,000.00 30-11-2012

Quotation Construction of MkuyuniMarket Building

M/S FideConstruction CoLtd

75,067,000.00 30-11-2012

Quotation Spot improvement worksALONG Mtego WaSimba - Ngerengere 6.5km Road

M/S Mex CoLtd

38,940,000.00 30-11-2012