north perry airport master plan update von stetina, senior planner, broward co. planning council...

North Perry Airport Master Plan Technical Advisory Committee Meeting30 May 2007

North Perry Airport Master Plan

Technical Advisory Committee MeetingNorth Perry Master Plan

May 30, 2007


2

TAC InviteesCounty RepresentativesBob Bielek, Interim Director of Aviation, BCAD Nina Demeo, Airport Manager, BCADDarlene Duecker, Assistant to Airport Manager, BCADMike Nonnemacher, Director of Operations, BCADStephen Wilson, Project Manager, BCADDoris Enriquez, Airport Properties Manager, BCADMarc Gambrill, Assistant Director of Planning & Development, BCADChristine Steiner, Assistant Airport Properties Manager, BCADYasmi Govin, Assistant County Attorney, BCADAllan Siegel, Community Outreach Coordinator, BCADNorm Taylor, Director, Broward Co. Economic DevelopmentHenry Sniezek, Executive Director, Broward Co. Planning CouncilDeanne Von Stetina, Senior Planner, Broward Co. Planning Council

FAA/FDOT RepresentativesRebecca Henry, Planing Program Manager, FAA Rene Alvarez, Team Operations, FAA/FSDOMike Keane, FAA/FSDONeil Morris, FAA/FSDOKen Martin, Air Traffic Manager (HWO), FAARebecca Mainardi, Aviation & Rail Section Leader, FDOT (Dist. 4)Dan Afghani, CFASPP, FDOT (Dist. 4)

Local Government RepresentativesJaye Epstein, Director of Planning, City of HollywoodLorie Mertens-Black, Director of Intergovernmental Affairs, City of HollywoodDonald Waldron, Director of Planning, City of MiramarRoberta J. Spicer, Planning, City of MiramarJoseph Yaciuk, Planning, City of Pembroke PinesLaurie Barnes-Zargo, Assistant Division Fire Chief, Pembroke Pines Fire Dept. Shawn Hallich, Assistant Division Fire Marshall, Pembroke Pines Fire Dept.

Tenants/NeighborsJan Shakespeare, Aviation Program Manager, Broward Community CollegeJorge Guerra, Dean, Aviation Institute, Broward Community College Jim McKeown, Assistant Manager, Air Superiority Hiam Molcho, President, Hollywood AviationLois Cotton, President, North Perry AerospaceThomas McMenamin, Vice President, North Perry Aviation Brian Broderson, VP Business Operations, Van Wagner Aerial MediaJohn Thompson, President, Boomerang Aviation Corp. Leo Holland, Florida Aero ClubTerry Fensome, President, Pelican Airways Stuart Hanley, Aztec AirwaysDave Reich, North Perry Airport TenantBob Cernuda, Crescent Helicopters


3

Tenant Meeting #1, Wednesday, June 14, 2006

TAC Meeting #1, December 13, 2006

City of Hollywood, February 12, 2007

City of Pembroke Pines, March 21, 2007

TAC Meeting #2, Wednesday, May 30, 2007

Meetings to Date

Tenant Meeting #2, Wednesday, June 27, 2007:

City of Miramar, Date Pending

Public Workshop, August 2007 (tentative)

Commission Presentation, October 2007 (tentative)

Meetings Pending


4

1 Inventory

2 Planning Guidelines

3 Forecasts

4 Demand/Capacity Analysis

5 Facility Requirements

7 Land Use Evaluation

8 Environmental Overview

Progress to Date Tasks Pending

6 Alternatives Analysis

9 Develop ALP Set / Airport Property Map

10 Capital Improvement Program

11 Financial Feasibility

12 Airport Property Map

13 Economic Impact Analysis

14 Business Tools

15 Final Master Plan Report & ALP Set


5

Demand/Capacity Analysis

Runway Use/Configuration

One instrument approach – Runway 9R (non-precision GPS)

Departures ≈ Arrivals

Capacity of the Airport : VFR = 195 operations/hourIFR = 24 operations/hour

Weighted hourly capacity = 186 operations/hourAnnual Service Volume (ASV) = 440,000 operations/year


6

Demand/Capacity Analysis

Sources: Forecast Demand – Terminal Area Forecast, March 2006ASV estimate – MCG based on FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060, Airport Capacity and Delay


7

Facility Requirements

Runways

Rehabilitate runway pavements

Consider a precision instrument approach

Increase the number of exit taxiways

Consider adding runway pavement

Use declared distances to maximize runway length

Add additional run-up areas


8


Rehabilitate pavements

Renovate BCAD buildings

Construct Taxiway “A”

Broward County Aviation Department Buildings1 BCAD Administration Office

2 Vacant

3 FAA Air Traffic Control Tower

4 FAA ATCT UPS Building

5 Airfield Lighting

6 Vacant

7 Vacant (Formerly Mayday’s Restaurant)

8 Vacant

9 Vacant

Pavement & BCAD Building Conditions


9

Airfield Lighting, Signage, and Marking

Remark all runways and taxiways as needed

Add MITL and lighted signs to Taxiway “A” and connectors, when developed

Rehabilitate the airfield lighting and signage as needed

Install additional reflectors on unlit taxiways and taxilanes

Rehabilitate the electrical vault as needed

Light Runway 9L-27R and supporting taxiways



10


Navigational and Visual Landing Aids

Add lighted windsocks to Runways 18R, 18L, and 27R

Light the windsocks near Runways 27L and 36L

Consider installation of GPS-WAAS or GPS-LAAS for a precision instrument approach

Upgrade REILs for 18R, 36L, and 27L through planning period

Upgrade PAPI-2’s for Runways 18R, 36L, 18L, 36R, and 27L

Upgrade PAPI-4 for Runway 9R

Identify locations for relocated VOR


11


Buildings

Consider adding a full service FBO at airport

Consider development of a GA terminal building

Renovate or remove deteriorating buildings

Upgrade ATCT and UPS building as needed

through planning period


12


Apron Space

Rehabilitate the apron pavement

Seal coat apron pavements

Install high mast apron lighting on aprons

Add additional apron space in long term to meet demand


13


Access and Infrastructure

Develop landscaping plan

Develop facility signage plan

Provide appropriate roadway lights on perimeter road

Install speed limit signs on perimeter road

Review emergency preparedness plans for utility providers for Airport

Upgrade security fencing as appropriate throughout planning period

Upgrade access control system throughout planning period

Install video identification and tracking system for nighttime surveillance


14


Other

Consider highest/best use of banner towing area

Purchase of avigation easements

Encourage airport compatibility planning in land use and zoning ordinances

Consider need for helipad(s) or operational agreement

Upgrade ARFF vehicle and equipment

Re-evaluate self fueling requirements for tenants in the minimum standards


15

Alternatives Analysis

Airside Alternatives Landside Alternatives

RunwaysTaxiways

Navigational Aids

ApronsHangars

New FBO/GA TerminalCustoms Facility

Helipad


16

Airside Alternatives


17


5,300 feet – 5,500 feet

Runway Length Requirements for North Perry Airport

SMALL AIRPLANES WITH LESS THAN 10 PASSENGER SEATS 2,450 feet – 3,570 feet

SMALL AIRPLANES WITH MORE THAN 10 PASSENGER SEATS 4,170 feetLARGE AIRPLANES OF 60,000 POUNDS OR LESS

75 – 100% of these large airplanes at 60% useful load

75 – 100% of these large airplanes at 90% useful load 7,000 feet – 7,810 feetBUSINESS JET AIRCRAFT (FAA Southern Region) 6,500 feetVERY LIGHT JET (VLJ) AIRCRAFT 2,500 feet – 3,400 feet

RUNWAY LENGTH RANGE 3,500 – 6,500 feet

Sources: FAA Advisory Circular 150/5325-4B, Runway Length Requirements for Airport Design; FAA Southern Region, RGL 00-1, Standard Development for Business Jet Aircraft, Revised August 28, 2002

EXISTING RUNWAY LENGTH RANGE 3,000 – 3,181 feet


18


Alternative 1 No Build

Alternative 2 Apply Declared Distances With Existing Pavement

Alternative 3 Construct Additional Pavement & Apply Declared Distances

Alternative 4 Accommodate Larger Aircraft


19


1 No Build


20

Alternatives Analysis 4 No Build


21

Alternatives Analysis 1 No Build

AdvantagesLeast expensive alternative

DisadvantagesLimits operations to smaller aircraftNo runway length improvements


22


2 Apply Declared Distances with Existing Pavement


23


TORA

TODA

ASDALDA

Displaced Threshold

200’

LEGENDTORA Take-off Run AvailableTODA Take-off Distance AvailableASDA Accelerate Stop Distance AvailableLDA Landing Distance AvailableRPZ Runway Protection Zone

RPZ RPZ

2 Apply Declared Distances w/ Existing Pavement


24

Alternatives Analysis 3 Apply Declared Distances with Existing Pavement


25

3 Apply Declared Distances with Existing Pavement


26


Declared Distances For Existing Runways at North Perry Airport

Runways9R 27L 9L 27R 18R 36L 18L 36R

Existing Length 3,000 3,045 3,060 3,181 3,000 3,000 3,150 3,075

TORA (in feet) 3,025 3,000 3,182 3,060 3,000 3,000 3,075 3,150

TODA (in feet) 3,255 3,255 3,242 3,242 3,350 3,350 3,260 3,260

ASDA (in feet) 3,255 3,255 3,242 3,242 3,350 3,000 3,260 3,260

LDA (in feet) 3,000 3,045 3,060 3,182 3,000 3,000 3,150 3,075

Source: FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300-Change 11, Airport Design, Appendix 14



27


AdvantagesInexpensive since no pavement or markings will be altered Maximizes usable runway for take-offs and landings

DisadvantagesDeclared distances can be confusing to pilotsDoes not accommodate 100% of small airplanes requiring 3,570 feet of runway



28

3 Construct Additional Pavement & Apply Declared Distances



29



30



31



32


33


Take-off Run and Landing Distances For North Perry Airport

Runways

9R 27L 9L 27R 18R 36L 18L 36R

Existing Length 3,000 3,045 3,060 3,181 3,000 3,000 3,150 3,075

Added Length (in feet) 700 660 535 850 390 490 725 595

TORA (in feet) 3,745 3,915 3,717 3,910 3,390 3,840 3,800 3,745

LDA (in feet) 3,915 3,745 3,910 3,717 3,840 3,390 3,745 3,800

Source: FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300-Change 11, Airport Design, Appendix 14

3 Construct Additional Pavement & Apply Declared Distances


34

Alternatives Analysis 3 Construct Additional Pavement & Apply Declared Distances

AdvantagesMaximizes runway lengths Accommodates 100% of small airplanes requiring 3,570 feet of runwayAccommodates 95% of VLJ fleet Provides opportunities for further airport development

DisadvantagesAdditional costs of new pavement for airfieldRunway operations closer to residential areaDeclared distances can be confusing to pilots


35

4 Accommodate Larger Aircraft


36


37


38

AdvantagesFacilitates HWO as General Aviation reliever to FLLAccommodates business jet aircraftIncreases opportunities for FBO, corporate hangars & industrial parksPotential increase of airport revenues

DisadvantagesMajor impacts to communityMajor impacts to residential and commercial Major capital cost Significant impacts to on-airport tenants due to relocation Requires preparation of Environmental Impact StatementIncreases runway dimensional criteria

This alternative is not recommended

Alternatives Analysis 4 Accommodate Larger Aircraft


39

Taxiway “A” & the Highest/Best Use of the Northwest Quadrant



40

Alternatives Analysis Taxiways


41

Alternatives Analysis Taxiway “A” & the Highest/Best Use of the Northwest Quadrant

AdvantagesEnhances operational capacity of Runway 18R-36LParallel taxiway provides development opportunities on west side of Runway 18R-36L

DisadvantagesConstruction costImpacts banner towing operations


42


Navigational Aids


43

Alternatives AnalysisEstablish Precision Instrument Approach

Alternative 1 Runway 9R-27L

Alternative 2 Runway 9L-27R

Alternative 3 Runway 18R-36L

Alternative 4 Runway 18L-36R

Very High Frequency Omni-Directional Range (VOR)Alternative 1 Southwest Quadrant

Alternative 2 Southeast Quadrant

Navigational Aids


44

Navigational AidsAlternatives Analysis

Establish Precision Instrument Approach


45


AdvantagesIncreases approach capability for airport

Provides navigational training for student pilotsEnhances business aircraft operationsSatisfies criteria for on-demand charter services

DisadvantagesMajor impacts to communityMajor capital costs: runway, taxiway & residential/commercial property acquisition (FAA recommends 4,200 feet of runway length for reliever airport designation)Obstructions must be removed from 50:1 approachSignificant impact to airport tenants due to required relocation Requires preparation of Environmental Impact Statement

Navigational Aids


46

Navigational AidsAlternatives Analysis

Relocation of Very High Frequency Omni-Directional Range (VOR)


47


AdvantagesMeets VOR siting criteria Provides VOR training for pilots Provides enhancement to navigational aids at HWO

DisadvantagesAlternative 1: ASOS, wind measuring equipment, relocate windsocks, VOR located in Runway Visibility Zone; potential site for helipadAlternative 2: Prohibits future airport development in this area

Navigational Aids


48

Landside Alternatives


49


Aprons6 potential sites

Hangars8 potential sites

New FBO/GA Terminal8 potential sites

Customs Facility

Helipad4 potential sites


50

Alternatives Analysis Aprons


51


Advantages

SiteExisting Access

to Runway/Taxiway

Ability to Expand Beyond Planning

Period

Can Accommodate

other GA Facilities

Road Access via Perimeter Road

Adjacent to Existing FBO &

Corporate/T-hangars

123456

Aprons


52

Disadvantages


Site

1 Banner Towing operations impacted in this areaNot adjacent to other existing GA facilities; requires construction of parallel Taxiway “A”

2 Access to primary runway and GA facilities is not as convenient

3 Not adjacent to other existing GA facilities; requires construction of parallel Taxiway “A”

4 Not adjacent to other existing GA facilities; requires construction of access/perimeter road

5 Not adjacent to other existing GA facilities

6 Can not be expanded beyond planning horizon

Aprons


53

Alternatives Analysis Hangars


54


Advantages

SiteExisting Access

to Runway/Taxiway

Ability to Expand Beyond Planning

Period

Can Accommodate

other GA Facilities

Road Access via Perimeter Road

Adjacent to Existing FBO &

Corporate/T-hangars

12345678

Hangars


55

Alternatives AnalysisDisadvantages

Site

1 Banner Towing operations impacted in this areaNot adjacent to other existing GA facilities; requires construction of parallel Taxiway “A”

2 Access to primary runway and GA facilities not as convenient

3 Not adjacent to other existing GA facilities; requires construction of parallel Taxiway “A”

4 Not adjacent to other existing GA facilities; requires construction of access/perimeter road

5 Not adjacent to other existing GA facilities

6 Requires paved access/perimeter road; BCAD lighting bldg. & ATCT/equipment, portion part of Hollywood Aviation leasehold

7 Property contained in existing tenant leaseholds

8 Property contained in existing tenant leaseholds

Hangars


56

Alternatives Analysis New FBO/GA Terminal

Minimum facility requirements for an FBO are outlined in BCAD’sMinimum Standards for General Aviation at County Airports, March 28, 2003.

HWO FBO must:Lease at least a six acre site

Construct 2,000 ft2 administration building

Provide 15 aircraft tie-down positions

Construct 5,000 ft2 maintenance hangar and 10,000 ft2 hangar and/or T-Hangars

Construct 60,000 ft2 apron

Provide paved automobile parking

Provide for 10,000 gal. fuel storage and one 250 gal. truck

Provide electric security gate to restrict unauthorized access to ramp


57

Alternatives Analysis New FBO/GA Terminal


58


Advantages

Site Provides Access from Perimeter Road

Does Not Interfere with Banner Towing

Adjacent to Taxiway/Runway/Cor

porate/Hangar Development

Has 6 Acres of Developable Land

12345678

New FBO/GA Terminal


59

Alternatives AnalysisDisadvantages

Site

1 Not located near primary runway

2 Not located near primary runway; Banner Towing operations impacted in this area; requires construction of parallel Taxiway “A”

3 Banner Towing operations impacted in this area; requires construction of parallel Taxiway “A”

4 Requires construction of access road

5 Requires construction of parallel Taxiway “A”; limited by building restriction line

6 BCAD (Aviation Lighting) and ATCT located in area; significant portion of area is part of Hollywood Aviation’s leasehold

7 Does not provide required 6 acres for FBO

8 Does not provide required 6 acres for FBO

New FBO/GA Terminal


60


South Florida General Aviation airports currently with customs facilities:Opa-locka Executive AirportFort Lauderdale Executive Airport Kendall-Tamiami Executive AirportSt. Lucie County International Airport

Need for a 5,000 square foot secure building

Preferred location is adjacent to FBO

U.S. Customs Facility


61

U.S. Customs and Border Protection User Fee Airport (UFA) applicant requirements: Volume or value of business at airport is insufficient to justify the availability of inspectional services on a non-reimbursable basisGovernor supports designation in writing to the Commissioner of CBPCounty agrees to reimburse CBP for all costs associated with the services, including expenses of staffing at least one full-time inspector County completes an Agriculture Compliance Agreement with FBOs and refuse haulers for handling international refuse

Basic steps required in considering an application for designation as a UFA include:Receipt of a letter from the Governor supporting the user fee airport designationSuccessful site visit in which CBP officials discuss workload and services and verify that facilities are adequate for inspectional services to be providedCompleting a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with CBP, which states the responsibilities, fees and hours of serviceCompleting an Agriculture Compliance Agreement with CBP for handling international refuse

Alternatives Analysis U.S. Customs Facility


62

Alternatives AnalysisAn approved UFA receiving CBP services is responsible for payment of the following fees:

Per Inspector: $140,000 + (1st year)$124,000 + (succeeding years)

Additional costs per inspector: $17,000 + (1st year)$14,000 + (succeeding years)

Other associated costs (i.e., overtime)



63


AdvantagesPossibility for increased operations from tourism to/from the Bahamas, U.S. Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, and other islands Possibility for increased revenue from fuel salesIncreased charter activitiesGood for airport businesses

DisadvantagesCounty would incur additional costs to build County would incur additional costs to operateCounty unlikely to recover costs through leasehold revenue



64

Alternatives Analysis Helipad


65

Alternatives Analysis Helipad

AdvantagesSites 1 and 2 provide adequate area for helipad; adjacent to Helicopters, Inc.Site 3 provides adequate area for a helipad; recommended area in 1996 Master Plan; near Crescent Helicopters; aligned with primary Runway 9R-27LSite 4 provides adequate area for a helipad and is near Crescent Helicopters; aligned with primary Runway 9R-27L

DisadvantagesSite 1 approach and departure path aligned to Runway 18R-36L; potential noise impacts; not convenient for helicopter operations on the south side of airfieldSite 2 approach and departure path aligned to Runway 18R-36L; Banner Towing operations impacted in this area; not convenient for helicopter operations on the south side of airfieldSite 3 located within the Runway Visibility Zone; area may be site for future VORSite 4 area may be site for future VOR


66

Next Steps

Evaluation of Alternatives

Recommended Capital Improvement Plan

Financial Analysis

Update Airport Layout Plan (ALP)


67

Questions/Comments/Suggestions

Please Contact

Monty Gettys at [email protected]

north perry airport master plan update von stetina, senior planner, broward co. planning council...

Documents