north korea: a war of words for now? - ocbc bank reports/ocbc korea outlook... · north korea: a...
TRANSCRIPT
North Korea: A war of words for now?
Barnabas Gan
Economist
Global Treasury Research & Strategy
August 2017
1
2
Executive Summary • For now, it is merely a war of words. Rhetorically, US vice-president Mike Pence has
mentioned that “all options (are) on the table”, while Trump citing “fire and fury”. Japan, a
close proximity to North Korea, has also voiced that North Korea “is a grave threat to
(Japan)… We strongly condemn such acts.” The only peace-making comment is heard from
China, given official comments that China “will absolutely not permit war or chaos on the
peninsula,” and for good reasons.
• However, if the war of words escalate into a military engagement, our estimates suggest a
derailing of global growth, led by a fall in both trade volumes and asset prices. Even in
today’s war of words, there has been an observable rise in demand for safe haven assets,
such as the JPY, UST and gold, while dragging growth-related assets like equities. As of 11th
August, the dollar has fallen to its April ‘17 low against the yen, while gold rallied to near its
$1,300/oz. Should the escalation prove to be a prolonged one, gold may rally by as much as
30% while global equities (especially Wall Street) could fall by as much as 20%. Elsewhere,
the JPY should eventually fall given the proximity of the conflict.
• Despite the recent intensification, there are no signs that the US is planning a pre-emptive
strike against North Korea, nor are there any evidences that Kim will make good on threats to
hit US shores. For war to eventually start, the US must (1) first evacuate tens of thousands of
US civilians from South Korea and Japan, (2) deploy a reinforcement of troops in the Korean
Peninsula, and (3) ensure collateral damage on Asian shores (China, South Korea, Japan) to
be limited. A pre-emptive strike by either parties is unlikely as well, as it could adversely dent
global risk-taking appetite, not mentioning the many lives lost as a result.
3
Nuclear Disarmament is the best way forward
Best case: North Korean nuclear disarmament.
South Korea President Moon Jae-in’s “Moonshine Policy” succeeds in garnering adequate
interest from the North. South Korea’s “Moonshine Policy” is said to “actively pursue
reconciliation and cooperation” with North Korea to eventually “achieve peaceful reunification
one day”. However, improving economic ties may prove to be difficult; Moon has to deal with
both domestic and foreign pressure in achieving this goal. S. Korean conservatives perennially
criticised the South’s effort to provide an economic lifeline to the North. Moreover till date, Moon
has not been able to engage in talks with Kim, suggesting a stand-still on his reunification
efforts.
Source: CEIC, TNS Korea, OCBC Bank
Poll results are dated in 2014.
4
N. Korea will benefit immensely from reunification
Source: Google Images, Bank of Korea, Thomson
Reuters, CIA World Factbook, OCBC Bank
5
A military engagement is a catastrophe Worst case: An escalation into military intervention
To date, Kim has boasted missile capabilities of striking “anywhere in the world”. Trump’s
recent retort that North Korean threats would be met with “fire and fury”. A pre-emptive strike by
either the US or North Korea could adversely dent global risk-taking appetite, not mentioning
the many lives that will be lost as a result. Even in today’s war of words, there has been an
observable rise in demand for safe haven assets, such as the JPY, UST and gold, while
dragging growth-related assets like equities.
Source: CEIC, OCBC Bank
US11%
China12%
Japan4%
South Korea3%
Australia & NZ1%
Hong Kong2%Canada
3%
Others64%
More than a third of global trade may be adversely affected if a war breaks out
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
Geo
rgia
(2
00
8)
Afg
han
ista
n (
20
01
)
Bo
snia
(1
99
2-9
5)
Ukr
ain
e (
20
14
-15
)
Iraq
(2
00
3)
Ku
wai
t (1
99
1)
Syri
a (2
01
1-2
01
6)
Iraq
(1
99
1)
Sou
th K
ore
a (1
95
0-5
3)
Peak-to-trough change in GDP (% points) during wartimes
6
A military act to derail the global trade recovery?
Source: CEIC, OCBC Bank
16.7%
14.0% 13.5%
5.6%4.5%
3.2% 3.2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
China Canada Mexico Japan Germany UnitedKingdom
SouthKorea
US: % of total trade
15.7%
7.9%7.0% 6.5%
4.3%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
United States Japan Hong Kong South Korea Germany
China: % of total trade
23.0%
15.3%
5.5%3.9% 3.5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
China UnitedStates
SouthKorea
Thailand Australia
Japan: % of total trade
26.3%
12.1%
7.7%
4.8%2.9%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
China UnitedStates
Japan Vietnam HongKong
South Korea: % of total trade 89.3%
2.1% 1.2% 0.6%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
China India Russia Philippines
North Korea: % of total trade
7
Impact on key asset class during past conflicts
Source: CEIC, OCBC Bank
19.5%
5.9%
15.5%
27.6%
16.1%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Aug 1990:Invasion of
Kuwait
May 1991: Iraq March 2003:Iraq
July 2011: Syria Dec 2011:Hormuz Strait
Gold will appreciate as a safe haven asset
4.1%
20.7%
4.2%
8.0% 8.9%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Aug 1990:Invasion of
Kuwait
May 1991: Iraq March 2003:Iraq
July 2011: Syria Dec 2011:Hormuz Strait
Dollar strength could prevail should war breaks out
-17.2%
-4.6%
-14.9% -15.8%
-3.5%
-20%-18%-16%-14%-12%-10%
-8%-6%-4%-2%0%
Aug1990:
Invasionof Kuwait
May1991:Iraq
March2003:Iraq
July2011:Syria
Dec2011:
HormuzStrait
Dow Jones: Equities will likely suffer 16.8%
-10.6%
0.0%
5.8%2.5%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
Aug1990:
Invasionof Kuwait
May1991:Iraq
March2003:Iraq
July2011:Syria
Dec2011:
HormuzStrait
Impact on the yen appears to be mixed
-113
38
-99
-146
0
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
Aug1990:
Invasionof
Kuwait
May1991:Iraq
March2003:Iraq
July2011:Syria
Dec2011:
HormuzStrait
bp
s ch
g
US 10Y Treasuries would likely be sought after
8
Referencing history: Should a military conflict
occur
Source: Bloomberg, CEIC, OCBC Bank
Current
(11th Aug
2017)
Aug 1990:
Invasion of
Kuwait
May
1991: Iraq
March
2003: Iraq
July 2011:
Syria
Dec 2011:
Hormuz
Strait
Escalation of
military
conflict?
Gold 1290 +19.5% +5.9% +15.5% +27.6% +16.1% +6% to +30%
DJIA 21800 -17.20% -4.60% -14.90% -15.80% -3.50% -4% to -20%
JPY 109 +16.8% -10.60% Flat +5.8% +2.5% -5% to -15%
UST 10Y Yield 2.19%-113bps
(-12.5%)
+38bps
(+4.4%)
-99bps
(-24.2%)
-146bps
(-46.0%)Flat
0 to -60bps
(0% to -27%)
DXY 93.36 +4.1% +20.7% +4.2% +8.0% +8.9% 0% to +20%
9
How asset classes react during missile launches
Source: CEIC, OCBC Bank
Dates refer to recent North Korean missile launches
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
t-3
0
t-2
7
t-2
4
t-2
1
t-1
8
t-1
5
t-1
2
t-9
t-6
t-3 t
t+3
t+6
t+9
t+1
2
t+1
5
t+1
8
t+2
1
t+2
4
t+2
7
t+3
0
Dow Jones Industrial Average
Jul-28 Jul-04 May-13
84
89
94
99
104
109
114
t-3
0
t-2
7
t-2
4
t-2
1
t-1
8
t-1
5
t-1
2
t-9
t-6
t-3 t
t+3
t+6
t+9
t+1
2
t+1
5
t+1
8
t+2
1
t+2
4
t+2
7
t+3
0
S. Korea CDS
Jul-28 Jul-04 May-13
94
96
98
100
102
104
106
108
t-3
0
t-2
7
t-2
4
t-2
1
t-1
8
t-1
5
t-1
2
t-9
t-6
t-3 t
t+3
t+6
t+9
t+1
2
t+1
5
t+1
8
t+2
1
t+2
4
t+2
7
t+3
0
Gold
Jul-28 Jul-04 May-13
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
t-3
0
t-2
7
t-2
4
t-2
1
t-1
8
t-1
5
t-1
2
t-9
t-6
t-3 t
t+3
t+6
t+9
t+1
2
t+1
5
t+1
8
t+2
1
t+2
4
t+2
7
t+3
0
USDKRW
Jul-28 Jul-04 May-13
10
Another cold war? Status quo: Still an ongoing war of words
Despite the intensification of geopolitical concerns, there remains no signs that the US is
planning a pre-emptive strike against North Korea, nor are there any evidences that Kim will
make good on threats to hit US shores. For war to eventually start, the US must (1) first
evacuate tens of thousands of US civilians from South Korea and Japan , (2) deploy a
reinforcement of troops in the Korean Peninsula, and (3) ensure collateral damage on Asian
shores (China, South Korea, Japan) to be limited. Elsewhere, North Korean’s missile
capabilities are untested in actual battle, and their accuracy is far from certain. To that end, Kim
will likely not risk a pre-emptive strike, only to inaccurately hit an unintended target and risk
international scorn.
Source: US Department of Defense, Google Images,
CEIC, OCBC Bank
US military bases in the
region
17600
18600
19600
20600
21600
22600
Au
g-1
6
Au
g-1
6
Sep
-16
Oct
-16
No
v-1
6
No
v-1
6
De
c-1
6
Jan
-17
Jan
-17
Feb
-17
Mar
-17
Mar
-17
Ap
r-1
7
May
-17
May
-17
Jun
-17
Jul-
17
Au
g-1
7
DJIA: Investors habitually shrug off geopolitical concerns... For now.
12
This publication is solely for information purposes only and may not be published, circulated, reproduced or distributed in whole or in part to any other person without
our prior written consent. This publication should not be construed as an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the securities/instruments
mentioned herein. Any forecast on the economy, stock market, bond market and economic trends of the markets provided is not necessarily indicative of the future or
likely performance of the securities/instruments. Whilst the information contained herein has been compiled from sources believed to be reliable and we have taken all
reasonable care to ensure that the information contained in this publication is not untrue or misleading at the time of publication, we cannot guarantee and we make no
representation as to its accuracy or completeness, and you should not act on it without first independently verifying its contents. The securities/instruments mentioned
in this publication may not be suitable for investment by all investors. Any opinion or estimate contained in this report is subject to change without notice. We have not
given any consideration to and we have not made any investigation of the investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of the recipient or any class of
persons, and accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of the
recipient or any class of persons acting on such information or opinion or estimate. This publication may cover a wide range of topics and is not intended to be a
comprehensive study or to provide any recommendation or advice on personal investing or financial planning. Accordingly, they should not be relied on or treated as a
substitute for specific advice concerning individual situations. Please seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product taking
into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs before you make a commitment to purchase the investment product. OCBC
and/or its related and affiliated corporations may at any time make markets in the securities/instruments mentioned in this publication and together with their respective
directors and officers, may have or take positions in the securities/instruments mentioned in this publication and may be engaged in purchasing or selling the same for
themselves or their clients, and may also perform or seek to perform broking and other investment or securities-related services for the corporations whose securities
are mentioned in this publication as well as other parties generally.
Co.Reg.no.:193200032W
Disclaimer Treasury Market Research & Strategy
Selena Ling ([email protected]) Tel : (65) 6530 4887
Emmanuel Ng ([email protected]) Tel : (65) 6530 4073
Wellian Wiranto ([email protected]) Tel : (65) 6530 5949
Tommy Xie Dongming ([email protected]) Tel : (65) 6530 7256
Barnabas Gan ([email protected]) Tel : (65) 6530 1778
Terence Wu ([email protected]) Tel : (65) 6530 4367
OCBC Credit Research
Andrew Wong ([email protected]) Tel : (65) 6530 4736
Wong Liang Mian ([email protected]) Tel : (65) 6530 7348
Ezien Hoo ([email protected]) Tel : (65) 6722 2215
Wong Hong Wei ([email protected]) Tel: (65) 6722 2533