noroviruses and food borne disease: a little pathogen that causes big problems lee-ann jaykus, ph.d....
TRANSCRIPT
Noroviruses and Food borne Noroviruses and Food borne Disease:Disease:
A Little Pathogen that Causes Big A Little Pathogen that Causes Big ProblemsProblems
Lee-Ann Jaykus, Ph.D.Lee-Ann Jaykus, Ph.D.Professor and IAFP PresidentProfessor and IAFP President
What are the Human Enteric What are the Human Enteric Viruses?Viruses?
Obligate intracellular parasitesObligate intracellular parasites Simple structure, RNA genomeSimple structure, RNA genome Very smallVery small Transmitted by humansTransmitted by humans
• FecesFeces• Vomitus (Norovirus)Vomitus (Norovirus)
Highly transmissible Highly transmissible Difficult to:Difficult to:
• StudyStudy• DetectDetect
Duizer and Koopmans, 2007
Sources of Exposure to Enteric Viruses
Drinking Water FOODS Person-to-Person
“Direct” (f ecal) VI RUS TRANSMI SSI ON “I ndirect” (vomitus) Fomites Other Recreational waters Soil
At-Risk FoodsAt-Risk Foods
• Molluscan Shellfish• Fresh Produce • Ready-to-Eat Foods•Others
Grand Canyon Outbreak
Fig 1. Distribution of ill rafters by days from start of trip (N=137)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Trip Days
Ill R
afte
rs
Median norovirus incubation period (33 hours)
0
1
2
3
4
5
Days (Aug 14 - Sep 19)
Raf
tin
g t
rip
s (
N)
WELL TRIPS
ILL TRIPS
Fig 2. Dates of launch for all rafting trips from implicated companies, and timeline of meat preparation and consumption, Grand Canyon,
Aug 14 - Sep 19, 2005
= Meat from “Batch 1” served on trip
Aug 13-14:
Meat-slicerill
Aug 15-16Batch 1
deli meat sliced
Aug 18-23:
Batch 1 delivered
Aug 19:
1st affected trip
Sep 12: Batch 1
withdrawn
Sep 15: Guide ill
Sep 17:Other rafters ill
Not served meat from Batch 1, but guide ate withdraqwn Batch 1 meat 1 day before embarking and likely seeded outbreak.on trip
Source: Malek et al., 2009
Food borne Enteric Viruses of Known Food borne Enteric Viruses of Known Epidemiological SignificanceEpidemiological Significance
-Most severe of the foodborne viral diseases
-Approximately 5% of cases are food borne
- Reoviridae
- Important cause of infant diarrhea world-wide with relatively high mortality
- Food borne transmission rare
- Leading cause of viral food borne disease; leading cause of food borne disease?
- 20-80% of cases are transmitted by contaminated foods
Hepatitis A virus NorovirusesRotavirus
Human Noroviruses Human Noroviruses (HuNoV)(HuNoV)
CalcivirideaCalciviridea Five generaFive genera
SapovirusSapovirus NorovirusNorovirus
Multiple genogroupsMultiple genogroups GIGI GIIGII
Many genotypesMany genotypes Clinical featuresClinical features
From: Bank-Wolf et al., 2010Donaldson et al., 2010
Epidemiological Importance of HuNoV
Role of HuNoV in global burden of disease•Most common cause of acute gastroenteritis in
industrialized countries (Glass et al., 2010)•Leading cause of food borne disease (~50% of
outbreaks of confirmed etiology in US) (CDC, 2009, 2010)
•Likely responsible for much food borne disease of “unknown etiology”
•Role of personal hygiene (>56%) (Widdowson et al., 2005)
Why are Noroviruses Such Why are Noroviruses Such a Big Problem? a Big Problem?
Features of the virus Features of the virus Features of the host Features of the host Virus-Host interactionsVirus-Host interactionsDetection and control issues Detection and control issues ConclusionsConclusions
Features of the Virus
Capsid structure provides: Environmental persistence Resistance to inactivation
RNA genome provides: High error rate and lack of
proof-reading mechanism results in:• Mutation• Recombination
From: Duizer and Koopmans, 2007
Noroviruses
Persistence and Resistance: Persistence and Resistance: Epidemiological EvidenceEpidemiological Evidence
3 month durationPerson-to-person spreadPropagated outbreak despite extensive infection control measures From: CDC, 2009
GII NoV Persistence on Surfaces (by RT-qPCR)
NoV GII Persistence and NoV GII-RNA stability on industrial surfaces
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Time (days)
Lo
g N
o.
co
pie
s R
NA
/re
ac
tio
n
FormicaSSRNA FormicaRNA SS
NoV GII Persistence and NoVGII-RNA stability on lettuce
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Time (days)L
og
No
. c
op
ies
RN
A/r
ea
cti
on
4°C22°CRNA-4°CRNA-RT
Disinfection EfficacyHypochlorite Disinfection (RT-qPCR)
g
g
ff
ee
dd
c
bbb
aa
a
a
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
75pp
m
250p
pm
500p
pm
1000
ppm
75pp
m
250p
pm
500p
pm
1000
ppm
5ppm
75pp
m
250p
pm
500p
pm
5ppm
75pp
m
250p
pm
500p
pm
Chlorine Concentration
Lo
g R
edu
ctio
n
NV GII.2
NV GII.4 MNV-1FCV
Ethanol Disinfection (RT-qPCR)
ee
e
dd
cbbbaaa
-1-0.5
00.5
11.5
22.5
33.5
44.5
Ethanol Concentration
Lo
g R
edu
ctio
nNV GII.2
NV GII.4
MNV-1
FCV
Log10 NV reduction after exposure to dry, hand sanitizer, liquid soap and water rinse
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Dry HS LS WR
Exposures
NV
Lo
g1
0 R
ed
uc
tio
n
Dry
HS
LS
WR
Figure. The mean log10 NV reduction measured by Taqman real-time PCR for three hand wash agents. HS: hand sanitizer LS: liquid soap WR: water rinse.
Host Features: Susceptibility
Genetics and acquired immunity
Genetics Histo blood group antigens
(HBGAs) and FUT-2 secretor status
Virus-specific Host cell binding receptor or co-
receptor Acquired Immunity
Short-term (months) No long-term (years) Some, but not broad, cross
protection Opportunities for vaccination?
From: Donaldson et al., 2010
Virus-Host Interactions: Dose-Response Relationships
Some probability of infection (although low) at <100 quantifiable genome copies
Infection in 50% of susceptible individuals at ~5 x 103 quantifiable genome copies
How much fecal matter? 1 g feces = 108 genome copies Need about 103 for 50% infection risk 0.00001 g
Source: Teunis et al., 2008
Fecal Shedding of HuNoVAcute Phase
Strain dependentGenogroup I: ~105-106 genomic units/gGenogoup II: ~108 genomic units/gGenogroup II.4 (epidemic): ~1010 genomic units/g
Statistically associated with duration of diarrhea (2 log10)
Asymptomatic food handlersConvalescent phase
Sources: Lee et al., 2007; Chan et al., 2006
Detection IssuesDetection Issues It’s complicated!It’s complicated!
Availability of viruses Availability of viruses Inert in foodsInert in foods Inability to culture Inability to culture in vitroin vitro Requires concentration, purification, and Requires concentration, purification, and
molecular detectionmolecular detection Relationship (or lack thereof) between Relationship (or lack thereof) between
viability (infectivity) and molecular detectionviability (infectivity) and molecular detection Surrogates?Surrogates?
The result: No reliable commercial The result: No reliable commercial method to detect HuNoV in feces, the method to detect HuNoV in feces, the environment, or foodsenvironment, or foods
Control IssuesControl Issues HuNoV persistenceHuNoV persistence
• 44ooC/60 days (<50% inactivation)C/60 days (<50% inactivation)• Complete inactivation 21Complete inactivation 21oo C/14-28 d (or more), 37 C/14-28 d (or more), 37oo C/1- C/1-
10 d 10 d HuNoV resistance to sanitizersHuNoV resistance to sanitizers
• Hypochlorite, iodine, gluteraldehyde effectiveHypochlorite, iodine, gluteraldehyde effective• Quats, ethanol, anionic detergents less effectiveQuats, ethanol, anionic detergents less effective
HuNov resistance to processesHuNov resistance to processes• HeatHeat• Ionizing radiationIonizing radiation• High pressureHigh pressure
The “Perfect” Pathogen?The “Perfect” Pathogen?
Tendency to evolve/emerge yields new strains, Tendency to evolve/emerge yields new strains, many co-circulating strainsmany co-circulating strains
Complex, incomplete and short-lived immunity Complex, incomplete and short-lived immunity means constant pool of susceptible personsmeans constant pool of susceptible persons
Low infectious does and high levels of virus in Low infectious does and high levels of virus in feces facilitates transmissionfeces facilitates transmission
Shedding in vomitus exacerbates the problemShedding in vomitus exacerbates the problem Persistence in the environment results in long-Persistence in the environment results in long-
term exposureterm exposure Difficulties in inactivation exacerbates the Difficulties in inactivation exacerbates the
problemproblem
Hepatitis E virus
Severe disease, esp. in pregnant women
Developing countries Waterborne Outbreak and sporadic
Industrialized countries Travelers (cruise ship
outbreak) Recently, autochthonous Potentially zoonotic?
From: Aggarwal and Naik, 2009
Worldwide Distribution of HEV Genotypes in Human Populations
From: Aggarwal and Naik, 2009
Other Gastointestinal Viruses? Perhaps causes of food borne disease of
“unknown” etiology Other members of the Picornaviridae family (human
enteroviruses, coxsackieviruses) Enteric adenoviruses Astroviruses Sapoviruses Probably many others (parvoviruses, enteric
coronaviruses, Bocaviruses) Current data based on analysis of fecal specimens
of patients presenting with acute gastroenteritis
Control of Viruses n Foods: Where We Are?
Increased recognition of the role of viruses in food borne disease
Food handling appears to be the most common source of contamination
AVOID HUMAN FECAL CONTAMINATION!! Hand-washing (soap and warm water) is best
control to date if implemented appropriately and frequently
Exclusion of food handlers with suspicious symptoms
Rigorous surface disinfection (high concentrations of chlorine) for vomiting incidents or fecal contamination
Control of HuNoV in Foods: Where We Need to Be
Cultivable human strain (HuNoV) More effective prevention and control strategies
• Better hand and surface sanitizers• Improved hygiene compliance on the part of food
handlers• Alternative indicators• Processes• Vaccines?
Commercial detection methods• Clinical• Food and Environmental
Acknowledgements Students and Staff
• Dr. Helen Rawsthorne (Lab Manager)• Dr. Doris D’Souza, Dr. Amir Mokhtari, Dr. Julie
Jean (Post-Docs)• Dr. Blanca Escudero-Abarca (lead scientist)• Many students: Alissa Dix, Paris Leggitt, Dr.
Arnie Sair, Dr. Efstathia Papafragou, Grace Tung, Matthew Moore, You Li
Collaborators• Dr. Christine Moe (Emory University)• Dr. Jan Vinje (CDC)
Funding Agencies• ILSI-NA• USDA Food Safety Safety Research Programs• NC Agricultural Service and Foundation