norma a. atienza, bsn, mpa, rn, cic, cphq october 26, 2011 performance improvement: making it simple...
TRANSCRIPT
Norma A. Atienza, BSN, MPA, RN, CIC, CPHQ
October 26, 2011
Performance Improvement: Making It Simple for the Creative (Busy) Minds
Quality / Performance Improvement
Definitions:
A planned, systematic, approach to monitor, analyze and improve performance, thereby continually improving the quality of patient care and services provided and the likelihood of desired patient outcomes.
The continuous study and adaptation of a healthcare organization’s functions and processes to increase the probability to better meet the needs of individuals and other users of services.
Quality / Performance Improvement Process
• PI Projects are identified / approved by the governing body as initiatives that are important to support the mission and the strategic goals of the organization
• Projects are also identified based on high volume, high risk and those that affect patient care that potentially will have negative outcomes.
• Infection Control – looking at processes and outcomes that supports the goals of the practice aligning to the strategic goals of the institution.
Why Performance Improvement?
The quest for Quality has become relentless especially with the advent of health care reform
Quality initiatives have become more prominent not only with government initiatives that set specific benchmarks to improve patient care but also among other health care insurers.
Common PI Methodologies or Approaches:Shewart Cycle / PDCA or PDSA CyclePDCA was developed by Walter Shewhart in the 1920s and
Edwards Deming adapted the process and called it PDSA Cycle– Plan
• Plan change• Study a process by collecting necessary data• Evaluate the results• Formulate a plan for improvement
• Set goals and target• Determine methods for reaching goals
– Do• Implement the plan (trial, house-wide)• Educate / train
– Check or Study• Gather data and evaluates results of the change• Determine success of action taken• Modifications needed
– Act• Implement the plan changes• Not successful, abandon the plan and rework the cycle
FOCUS - PDCA Model
Originated with the Hospital Corporation of America now HCA Healthcare. It assumes that a PI or a QI process is already in place to improve.• F = Find a process to improve
– define the process, identify the process– who will benefit from the improvement– how the process fits w/in the org priorities
• O = Organize a team that knows the process– people knowledgeable about and involved in the process– manageable team size, appropriate members– method to document team progress (WWW)
• C = Clarify current knowledge of the process– gather and review current knowledge – analyze to distinguish between expected and actual performance
• U = Understand variable and causes of variation– Plan and implement data collection– Measure using appropriate indicators
• Select = the process improvement– Identify action to improve
Other Approaches to Performance Improvement
• Change Acceleration Process (CAP)– A process that proactively plans for change
acceptance for successful implementation – Streamlines “traditional QI approaches– Requires top leadership support to succeed
• Work-Out– Promotes rapid problem solving via involvement
and accountability– Flowchart, cost/benefit of solutions– Test period or pilot
• Lean– Focused on eliminating waste through detailed
analysis of workflow
Six Sigma Strategy
• Was a strategy developed by Motorola in the mid-1980s and implemented successfully in GE and Allied Signal (manufacturing) as a way to reduce common cause variation and error rates.
• Driven by statistical analysis of data to identify causes of unwanted variation and defects
Sigma Value
DPMO
Defects / million opportunities
Quality Yield
(% quality standards achieved)
COQ/COPQ
Cost as % of total
1δ & 2δ 700,000/308,537
(non-competitive)
Poor High
3δ 66,807 93.3% 25-40%
4δ 6210 99.4% 15-25%
5δ 233 99.98% 5-15%
6δ 3.4
(world Class
99.999% <1%
Adapted from: Caldwell, Brexler, Gillem. Lean-Six Sigma for Healthcare
The DMAIC Approach
D: Define• Define the problem• Set the goals• Identify the customers• Who are your team members
M: Measure• How is the process performed• Identify the metrics• What data will be collected • Methodology in collecting the data
The DMAIC Approach
A: Analyze• Review data, what have the PI tools revealed
(fishbone, flowchart, etc.)• Identify or diagnose root cause• What is the data telling us
I: Improve• Improve the process• Identify actions needed to achieve the
performance goal• Apply WWW process as needed• Implement actions for improvement• Review and compare old and new process,
what was changed
The DMAIC Approach
C: Control
• In control only when goal is reached – then maintain and monitor the improvements Review data, what have the PI tools revealed (fishbone)
• If not, go back to data analysis. Review improvement processes in-placed, are they effective?
• Make changes as needed.
Metrics
• Outcome
• Process
• Person Centered
• Structure
Developing Goals
S – specific
M – measurable
A – attainable
R – relevant
T – time based
C – clearly understood
A – agreed upon
R – re-negotiated
Judy L’s
Examples:
1. To decrease HA CAUTI by 10% by the end of FY2012 from that of 2011.
2. By June 30, 2012, improve Core Measure aggregate perfect care score to 95%.
3. Reduce department expenses by maintaining no more than 1.8% (of total Salaries) in overtime expenses each month as reported in Visionware.
Review of Common
Graphs
and
Charts
Line Graph or Run Chart: provides a running record of a process overtime
Saint Clare's HospitalsFalls Data - July 2010 to April 2011
per 1000 Patient Days
2.95
2.492.71
3.76
1.48
3.10
1.45
2.29
2.66
4.02
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
Jul
Aug Sep Oct
Nov
Dec Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
Month
Fal
l Rat
e
Goal Ave = 2.70
Line Graph
Saint Clare's Hospital
3.30
4.22
1.852.27
2.03
1.441.17 1.25
1.65
1.10
1.852.09
1.11
1.80
0.981.43
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug
Mortality '10 RRT '10
Mortality rate continues to decrease in 2010 except for the couple of months. Again if RRT is decreased, mortality rate increased
Pie Chart or Circle Graph: used to display parts of a whole (proportional relationships)
Saint Clare's HospitalSite of CVAD Insertions
January to December 2010
26%
5%
38%
31% Subclavian
Femoral
IJ
Upper arm (PICCs)
Control Chart: a display of normal variations and “out of control” variations over time
3/113/
93/7
3/3
3/1
2/25
2/23
2/21
2/17
2/15
2/112/
92/7
2/3
2/1
1/28
1/25
1/21
1/19
1/17
1/13
1/111/
71/5
1/3
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
date1
Indiv
idual V
alu
e
_X=30.34
UCL=53.46
LCL=7.23
1
Denville TAT
Bar Chart: comparisons between different groups
0
20
40
60
80
100
Saint Clare's HospitalHandwashing Compliance
Hospital-Wide Discipline Specific
2009 2010
2009 73.5 96 91 78.6 69.6 88 77.8 80.4 67.7 31.9 66 42.1 83.9
2010 98.4 95 92.9 75 78.9 100 92.5 96.3 73.1 60 92.2 56.1 94
Phys Nsg NAs APNCM/S
WAnc. Tech
RespPT/OT
/STEnv.
Transport
Rad Techs
Phleb Other
22
Pareto: offers a comparison of causes of problems in a process and rank-order (prioritizes). Determine where to focus improvement efforts.
Count 132 95 13 11 3Percent 52.0 37.4 5.1 4.3 1.2Cum % 52.0 89.4 94.5 98.8 100.0
CommentsOther
PowerForm
missi
ng date/tim
e
PowerForm
miss
ing MD name
PowerForm
missi
ng MD nam
e/date
/time
PowerForm
not pres
ent
250
200
150
100
50
0
100
80
60
40
20
0
Count
Perc
ent
Pareto Chart of Critical Values PowerForm Audit
Realize that change is not always a process
improvement. Sometimes it’s a process of invention!
Wendy Kopp Founder of Teach for America
? Questions