Noise Feasibility Study

Proposed Residential Development,

981 & 995 Thompson Road South

Milton, Ontario

Prepared for:

Milton Thompson Road Development Limited Partnership 1100 Burloak Drive, Suite 300

Burlington, ON L7L 6B2

Prepared by

Yvonne Lo, BASc, PEng

Reviewed by

Sheeba Paul, MEng, PEng

February 12, 2020

HGC Project Number: 01900546

Table of Contents

1  Introduction and Summary ..................................................................................................... 1 

2  Site Description and Noise Sources ........................................................................................ 1 

3  Noise Level Criteria ................................................................................................................ 2 

3.1  Road Traffic Noise ........................................................................................................... 2 

4  Traffic Noise Predictions ........................................................................................................ 4 

4.1  Road Traffic ..................................................................................................................... 4 

4.2  Road Traffic Noise Predictions ........................................................................................ 4 

5  Discussion and Recommendations ......................................................................................... 5 

5.1  Outdoor Living Areas ....................................................................................................... 5 

5.2  Indoor Living Areas and Ventilation Requirements ........................................................ 5 

5.3  Building Façade Constructions ........................................................................................ 6 

5.4  Warning Clauses .............................................................................................................. 6 

6  Impact of the Development on Itself ...................................................................................... 7 

7  Impact of the Development on the Environment .................................................................... 7 

8  Summary of Recommendations .............................................................................................. 8 

8.1  Implementation................................................................................................................. 9 

Figure 1: Key Plan Figure 2: Proposed Site Plan Appendix A: Road Traffic Information Appendix B: Sample STAMSON 5.04 Output Appendix C: Supporting Drawings

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 1 981 & 995 Thompson Road, Milton, ON February 12, 2020

1 Introduction and Summary

HGC Engineering was retained by Milton Thompson Road Development Limited Partnership, to

conduct a noise feasibility study for a proposed residential development at 981 & 995 Thompson

Road, in Milton Ontario. The proposed development will include a six-storey residential

building, for a total of 138 units with one level of underground parking. The noise feasibility

study report is required as part of the approvals process by the municipality.

The primary noise source impacting the site was determined to be road traffic on Thompson

Road South. There are existing residences located to the east and west, and several commercial

buildings located on the south side of Kennedy Circle. Road traffic data for Thompson Road

South was obtained from the Town of Milton. The data was used to predict future sound levels at

the locations of the proposed building façades and in the outdoor living areas (OLA). The

predicted sound levels were compared to the guidelines of the Ministry of Environment,

Conservation, and Parks (MECP) and the Municipality to develop noise control

recommendations for the proposed site.

The results of this study indicate that with suitable noise control measures integrated into the

design of proposed residential development, it is feasible to achieve the MECP guideline sound

levels. Forced air ventilation systems with ductwork sized for the future installation of central air

conditioning by the occupant or an alternative means of ventilation to open windows will be

required for the proposed building. The use of central air conditioning will exceed this

requirement. Building constructions meeting the minimum requirements of the Ontario Building

Code will provide sufficient acoustical insulation for the indoor spaces to comply with the

MECP noise criteria. Warning clauses are required to inform future residents of the possible

traffic noise in the area and of the nearby commercial uses.

2 Site Description and Noise Sources

The proposed development is located to the east of Thompson Road and north of Kennedy Circle

in Milton, Ontario. The architectural plans prepared by KNYMH Inc., dated January 29, 2020

(“Zoning By-Law Amendment”) indicates the proposed six-storey residential building. Figure 1

is a key plan indicating the location of the proposed development. The proposed site plan and the

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 2 981 & 995 Thompson Road, Milton, ON February 12, 2020 noise prediction locations are presented in Figure 2. Preliminary floor plans are included in

Appendix C.

The acoustical environment surrounding the site is urban in nature. The subject site is currently

vacant and mostly flat. Other than the commercial buildings to the south of the subject site and to

the south of Kennedy Circle, the area surrounding the site is mainly residential. There are

existing residences closer to the existing commercial uses compared to the proposed building.

Sounds from the commercial uses were not audible during the site visit, nevertheless, a noise

warning clause is recommended in Section 5.4 to inform future occupants of the nearby

commercial uses in the area and that sounds may be audible at times.

The primary source of noise impacting the site was found to be road traffic on Thompson Road

South, which currently consists of two lanes in each direction (four lanes total). Other roads in

the vicinity such as Kennedy Circle and Bennett Boulevard are low volume roads and were not

considered in the analysis.

3 Noise Level Criteria

3.1 Road Traffic Noise

Guidelines for acceptable levels of road traffic noise impacting residential developments are

given in the MECP publication NPC-300, “Environmental Noise Guideline Stationary and

Transportation Sources – Approval and Planning”, Part C release date October 21, 2013, and are

summarized in Table 1. The values in Table 1 are energy equivalent (average) sound levels [LEQ]

in units of A-weighted decibels [dBA].

Table 1: MECP Road Traffic Noise Criteria (dBA)

Area Daytime LEQ (16 hour)

Road Nighttime LEQ (8 hour)

Road

Outdoor Living Area 55 dBA --

Inside Living/Dining Room 45 dBA 45 dBA

Inside Bedroom 45 dBA 40 dBA

Daytime references the period between 07:00 and 23:00, whereas nighttime is defined at the time

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 3 981 & 995 Thompson Road, Milton, ON February 12, 2020 between 07:00 and 23:00. The term “Outdoor Living Area” (OLA) is used in reference to an

outdoor patio, backyard, terrace, or other area where passive recreation is expected to occur.

Balconies that measure less than 4 m in depth are not classified as outdoor living areas under

MECP guidelines.

The MECP guidelines allow the daytime sound levels in an Outdoor Living Area to be exceeded

by up to 5 dBA, without mitigation, if warning clauses are placed in the purchase and rental

agreements to the property. Where OLA sound levels exceed 60 dBA, physical mitigation is

recommended to reduce the OLA sound level to below 60 dBA and as close to 55 dBA as

technically, economically, and administratively feasible.

A central air conditioning system as an alternative means of ventilation to open windows is

required for dwellings where nighttime sound levels outside living/dining room/bedroom

windows exceed 60 dBA or daytime sound levels outside living/dining room/bedroom windows

exceed 65 dBA. Forced-air ventilation with ducts sized to accommodate the future installation of

air conditioning is required when nighttime sound levels at bedroom/living/dining room

windows are in the range of 51 to 60 dBA or when daytime sound levels at living/dining

room/bedroom windows are in the range of 56 to 65 dBA.

Building components such as walls, windows, and doors must be designed to achieve indoor

sound level criteria when the plane of window nighttime sound level is greater than 60 dBA or

the daytime sound level is greater than 65 dBA due to road traffic noise.

Warning clauses to notify future residents of possible excesses are also required when nighttime

sound levels exceed 50 dBA at the plane of the bedroom/living/dining room window and

daytime sound levels exceed 55 dBA in the outdoor living area and at the plane of the

living/dining room/bedroom window due to road traffic.

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 4 981 & 995 Thompson Road, Milton, ON February 12, 2020

4 Traffic Noise Predictions

4.1 Road Traffic

Road traffic data for Thompson Road South was obtained from the Town of Milton in the form

of an Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) value of 13,071 vehicles and is provided in

Appendix A. This data was projected to 2030 at a growth rate of 2.5% per year. A commercial

vehicle percentage of 5% for Thompson Road was split into 4% medium trucks and 1% heavy

trucks. A day/night split of 90%/10% was assumed. The posted speed limit of 60 km/h was

applied. Table 2 summarizes the traffic data used in this study.

Table 2: Projected Road Traffic Data (2030)

Road Name Cars Medium Trucks

Heavy Trucks

Total

Thompson Road

Daytime 15 030 633 158 15 821 Nighttime 1 670 70 18 1 758

Total 16 700 703 176 17 579

4.2 Road Traffic Noise Predictions

To assess the levels of the road traffic noise, which will impact the study area in the future,

sound level predictions were made using STAMSON version 5.04, a computer algorithm

developed by the MECP. Sample STAMSON output is included in Appendix B.

Predictions of the traffic sound levels were made at the top-storey façades. Table 3 summarizes

the predicted sound levels at each of the sound level prediction locations, which are indicated in

Figure 2.

Table 3: Predicted Road Traffic Sound Levels [dBA] Without Mitigation

Location Description Daytime –

Façade LEQ (16) Nighttime –

Façade LEQ (8) A West Façade 65 58 B North Façade 62 55 C East Façade <55 <50 D South Façade 59 52 E Outdoor Amenity Space (Ground-Level) <55 N/A

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 5 981 & 995 Thompson Road, Milton, ON February 12, 2020

5 Discussion and Recommendations

The sound level predictions indicate that future traffic levels exceed MECP guidelines at some of

the façades of the proposed building. The west façade is the most impacted since it has the

greatest exposure to Thompson Road. Recommendations to address potential excesses are

discussed in this section of the report.

5.1 Outdoor Living Areas

The proposed development includes an outdoor amenity space on the ground floor (prediction

location [E]) that is greater than 4 m in depth. This space is classified as an outdoor amenity area

under MECP guidelines. The predicted sound level in this area was determined to be less than

55 dBA, which is below MECP guideline limits. Physical mitigation is not required.

The proposed residential units are assumed to have balconies or terraces less than 4 m in depth,

which are exempt from the definition of an OLA under MECP guidelines. These areas are

exempt from the traffic noise assessment.

5.2 Indoor Living Areas and Ventilation Requirements

The predicted daytime sound levels at the north, east and west façades (Prediction Location [A],

[B], and [D]) will be between 56 and 65 dBA during daytime, and between 51 dBA and 60 dBA

during nighttime. The proposed building will require the provision for future installation of

central air conditioning systems. This requirement is typically satisfied through the installation of

forced air ventilation systems with ductwork sized for the future installation of central air

conditioning by the occupant or an alternative means of ventilation to open windows. The use of

central air conditioning systems will exceed this requirement. Acceptable units are those that are

housed in their own closet with an access door for maintenance. The location, installation and

sound ratings of the outdoor air conditioning devices should minimize noise impacts and comply

with criteria of MECP publication NPC-300.

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 6 981 & 995 Thompson Road, Milton, ON February 12, 2020 5.3 Building Façade Constructions

The predicted future sound levels at all façades will be less than 65 dBA during the daytime

hours and less than 60 dBA during the nighttime hours. Any exterior façade constructions

meeting the requirements of the Ontario Building Code will provide sufficient sound insulation

for the indoor spaces.

5.4 Warning Clauses

The MECP guidelines recommend that warning clauses be included in the property and tenancy

agreements for all units with anticipated road traffic sound level excesses. Examples are

provided below.

Suggested wording for future dwellings with sound level excesses of the MECP criteria.

Type A:

Purchasers/tenants are advised that, despite the inclusion of noise control features in the development and within the building units, sound levels due to increasing road traffic may occasionally interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the noise criteria of the Municipality and the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks.

Suitable wording for future dwellings requiring forced air ventilation systems is given below.

Type B:

This dwelling unit has been fitted with a forced air heating system and the ducting etc., was sized to accommodate central air conditioning. Installation of central air conditioning will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the Municipality’s and the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks noise criteria. (Note: The location and installation of the outdoor air conditioning device should be done so as to minimize the noise impacts and comply with criteria of MECP publication NPC-300.)

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 7 981 & 995 Thompson Road, Milton, ON February 12, 2020 The suggested wording for proposed dwellings in close proximity to existing commercial

facilities is given below.

Type C:

Purchasers are advised that due to the proximity of existing commercial uses, sound levels from the facilities may be at times be audible.

These sample clauses are provided by the MECP as examples and can be modified by the

Municipality as required.

6 Impact of the Development on Itself

Section 5.9.1 of the Ontario Building Code (OBC) specifies the minimum required sound

insulation characteristics for demising partitions, in terms of Sound Transmission Class (STC)

values or Apparent Sound Transmission Class (ASTC). In order to maintain adequate acoustical

privacy between separate suites in a multi-tenant building, inter-suite partitions (walls and floor)

and associated flanking paths must meet or exceed these requirements. Suite separation from a

refuse chute, or elevator shaft, must meet or exceed STC-55. In addition, it is recommended that

the floor/ceiling constructions separating suites from any amenity, commercial, or other

mechanical spaces also meet or exceed STC-55.

Tarion’s Builder Bulletin B19R requires the internal design of condominium projects to integrate

suitable acoustic features to insulate the suites from noise from each other and amenities in

accordance with the OBC, and limit the potential intrusions of mechanical and electrical services

of the buildings on its residents. If B19R certification is needed, an acoustical consultant is

required to review the mechanical and electrical drawings and details of demising constructions

and mechanical/electrical equipment, when available, to help ensure that the noise impact of the

development on itself is maintained within acceptable levels.

7 Impact of the Development on the Environment

It is expected that any increase in local traffic associated with the development will not be

substantial enough to affect noise levels significantly.

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 8 981 & 995 Thompson Road, Milton, ON February 12, 2020 Sound levels from stationary (non-traffic) sources of noise such as rooftop air-conditioners,

cooling towers, exhaust fans, etc. should not exceed the minimum one-hour LEQ ambient

(background) sound level from road traffic, at any potentially impacted residential point of

reception, to comply with Town by-laws. Based on the levels observed during our site visit, the

typical minimum ambient sound levels in the area are expected to be 50 dBA or more during the

day and 45 dBA or more at night. Thus any electro-mechanical equipment associated with this

development (e.g. emergency generator testing, fresh-air handling equipment, etc.) should be

designed with these targets in mind such that they do not result in noise impact beyond these

ranges.

8 Summary of Recommendations

The following list and Table 4 summarize the recommendations made in this report. The reader

is referred to the previous sections of the report where these recommendations are discussed in

more detail.

1) Forced air ventilation systems with ductwork sized for future installation of central air

conditioning by the occupant or an alternative means of ventilation to open windows will be

required for the proposed building. The use of central air conditioning systems will exceed

this requirement. The location, installation and sound ratings of the air conditioning devices

should comply with NPC-300.

2) Building constructions meeting the minimum requirements of the Ontario Building Code will

provide sufficient acoustical insulation for the façades of the residential development.

3) Noise warning clauses should be included in all offers of purchase and sale, and property and

tenancy agreements for all units to inform future residents of the road traffic noise impacts

and the proximity to nearby commercial uses, as indicated in Section 5.4.

4) Demising assemblies must be selected to meet the minimum requirements of the Ontario

Building Code (OBC). If B19R certification is needed, an acoustical consultant is required to

review the mechanical and electrical drawings and details of demising constructions and

mechanical/electrical equipment, when available, to help ensure that the noise impact of the

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 9 981 & 995 Thompson Road, Milton, ON February 12, 2020

development on itself are maintained within acceptable levels. Outdoor sound emissions

should also be checked to ensure compliance with the Town by-laws.

Table 4: Summary of Noise Control Requirements and Noise Warning Clauses

Location Acoustic Barrier Ventilation

Requirements* Type of

Warning Clause

Building Construction Requirements

A --

Forced Air A, B, C OBC B --

C --

D --

E -- -- -- -- Note:

* The location, installation, and sound rating of the air conditioning condensers must be compliant with MECP Guideline NPC-300. -- No specific requirement OBC – meeting the minimum Ontario Building Code requirements

8.1 Implementation

To ensure that the noise control recommendations outlined above are fully implemented, it is

recommended that:

1. Prior to assumption of the subdivision, the Municipality’s building inspector or a

Professional Engineer qualified to provide acoustical engineering services in the Province

of Ontario to shall certify that the noise control measures for the Building have been

properly installed and constructed.

 

2 STOREYBRICKAND

STUCCODWELLING

GARAGE

1STOREYBRICK

DWELLING

DAYLIGHT TRIANGLE

WOOD LAND DRIP LINE 10M SETBACK

13

RAMPDOWN

52 PARKING SPACES

AMENITY

SHAFT

T

6 STOREY138 UNIT

CONDO APARTMENT

SID

EWAL

K

PROPOSED USABLE SITE AREA =9,239 S.M (0.92 Ha)

RO

AD W

IDEN

ING

PRINCIPLEENTRANCE

SIDEWALK

ARC

HIT

ECTU

RAL

FEA

TUR

E

SUR

VEYED W

ETLAND

LIMIT

12

13

SHAFT

SHAFT

EXTENT OF UNDERGROUND

EXTENT OF UNDERGROUND

ASPHALT

SIDEWALK

SIDEWALK

WETLAN

D LIM

IT SETBACK

WOODLAND DRIP LINE

EXTENT OF UNDERGROUND

SITE AREA =12,939 S.M (1.29 Ha)

UNDEVELOPED AREA

KENNEDY CIRCLE

THO

MPS

ON

RO

AD

CO

NC

. PAD

REF

USE

BIN

S (2

)

R-13.0m

R-13.0m

5 ST

OR

EY P

OR

TIO

N

5 STOREY PORTION

3 STOREY PORTION

CONC. PADRECYCLING BINS (20)

72

5

AMENITY

5MVISIBILITYTRIANGLE 5M

VISIBILITYTRIANGLE

APPROXFUTURE

DRIVEWAYLOCATION

EXTE

NT

OF

UN

DER

GR

OU

ND

EXTENT OFPROPOSED

USABLE AREA

HALTON GARBAGET-TURNAROUND

FIRE ROUTE

6 BICYCLE SPACES

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V VV V

V V V V V

102 INTERIOR U/GBICYCLE SPACES

STAIRS TO UNDERGROUND GARAGE

STAI

RS

TOU

ND

ERG

RO

UN

DG

ARAG

EEXISTING DRIVEWAYTO BE REMOVED

ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED

No.DRAWING SETS ISSUEDDATE

(DD,MM,YY) BY

No.REVISIONS TO DRAWINGDATE

(DD,MM,YY) BY

www.knymh.com info@knymh.com

K N Y M H I N C.

1006 SKYVIEW DRIVE • SUITE 101

BURLINGTON, ONTARIO • L7P 0V1

T 905.639.6595

F 905.639.0394

ARCHITECTURE • SOLUTIONS

PLOT DATE:

DRAWING VERSION:

DRAWN BY:

DRAWING SCALE:

DETAIL NUMBER

KEY TO DETAIL LOCATION

No.No. DRAWING SHEET NUMBER

BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER:

DRAWING SHEET NUMBER:

PROJECT NUMBER:

DRAWING SHEET TITLE:

CHECKED BY:

19041

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT PERMIT

January 29, 2020

THOMPSON ROADMILTON, ONTARIO

NOT FOR

CONSTRUCTIO

N

Milton Thompson Rd.Ltd. Partnership

ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT 1. 27,01,2020 MH

PRZEMYSLAW MYSZKOWSKI

7984LICENCE

AOF

ON O

OO SSAIRAT NIT

AIC

RCHITECTS

FILE

PA

TH:

TIM

ES

TAM

P:

Q:\2

019\

1904

1 - M

ilton

Tho

mps

on R

oad

Lim

ited

Par

tner

ship

- 98

1-99

5 Th

omps

on R

d S

\4. D

raw

ings

\4.0

3 S

chem

atic

Des

ign\

1904

1 - 2

020-

01-2

2 - C

once

pt 7

.dw

g20

20-0

1-29

11:

56:1

3 A

M

CONTRACTOR MUST CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND JOBCONDITIONS BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH WORK

ALL DRAWINGS MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO COMMENTSFROM MUNICIPAL DEPARTMENTS AND OTHER AGENCIES WITH AUTHORITY

ALL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY OF THEARCHITECTS AND MUST BE RETURNED AT THE COMPLETION OF THE WORK

THE CONTRACTOR WORKING FROM DRAWINGS NOT SPECIFICALLY MARKED"FOR CONSTRUCTION" MUST ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY AND BEAR COSTSFOR ANY CORRECTIONS OR DAMAGES RESULTING FROM HIS OR HER WORK

PRO

JEC

T N

OR

TH

--

AS NOTED

- - - -

001

--

A-SP1

SITE PLAN

1A-SP1

SITE PLANPLANS1:300

APPENDIX A

Road Traffic Information

Street: Thompson Rd S - NB+SB

City: Town of Milton

Computer Generated Summary Report

MH Corbin Traffic Analyzer Study

Location: 6

A study of vehicle traffic was conducted with the device having serial number 402504. The study was done in the NB+SB lane at Thompson Rd S - NB+SB in Town of Milton, ON in btwn Hepburn Rd & Kennedy Circle county. The study began on 2018-05-23 at 12:00 AM and concluded on 2018-05-24 at 12:00 AM, lasting a total of 24.00 hours. Traffic statistics were recorded in 15 minute time periods. The total recorded volume showed 13,071 vehicles passed through the location with a peak volume of 312 on 2018-05-23 at [05:30 PM-05:45 PM] and a minimum volume of 1 on 2018-05-23 at [02:00 AM-02:15 AM]. The AADT count for this study was 13,071.

Chart 1 lists the values of the speed bins and the total traffic volume for each bin. At least half the vehicles were traveling in the 60 - 70 KM/H range or lower. The average speed for all classifed vehicles was 64 KM/H with 61.85% vehicles exceeding the posted speed of 60 KM/H. 9.99% percent of the total vehicles were traveling in excess of 89 KM/H. The mode speed for this traffic study was 60KM/H and the 85th percentile was 77.15 KM/H.

SPEED

< 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140

9 19 29 39 49 59 69 79 89 99 109 119 129 139 >

CHART 1

5 9 35 271 1494 3084 4398 2260 913 252 118 0 0 0 0

to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to

Chart 2 lists the values of the classification bins and the total traffic volume accumulated for each bin.

CLASSIFICATION

Most of the vehicles classified during the study were Passenger Vehicles. The number of Passenger Vehicles in the study was 12161 which represents 95 percent of the total classified vehicles. The number of Small Trucks in the study was 395 which represents 3 percent of the total classified vehicles. The number of Trucks/Buses in the study was 180 which represents 1 percent of the total classified vehicles. The number of Tractor Trailers in the study was 103 which represents 1 percent of the total classified vehicles.

< 5.0 8.5 10.0 13.0 19.0 22.5

4.9 8.4 9.9 12.9 15.9 18.9 22.4 >

16.0

CHART 2

4922 7239 395 180 75 15 9 4

to to to to to to to to

During the peak traffic period, on 2018-05-23 at [05:30 PM-05:45 PM] the average headway between vehicles was 2.875 seconds. During the slowest traffic period, on 2018-05-23 at [02:00 AM-02:15 AM] the average headway between vehicles was 450 seconds.

HEADWAY

WEATHER

The roadway surface temperature over the period of the study varied between 14.00 and 44.50 degrees C.

Page:2018-05-29 06:50 PM 1

APPENDIX B

Sample STAMSON 5.04 Output

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 12-02-2020 11:49:06 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: a.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Predicted daytime and nighttime sound levels at the west façade of the proposed building, prediction location [A]. Road data, segment # 1: ThompsonRd (day/night) ---------------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 15030/1670 veh/TimePeriod * Medium truck volume : 633/70 veh/TimePeriod * Heavy truck volume : 158/18 veh/TimePeriod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 13071 Percentage of Annual Growth : 2.50 Number of Years of Growth : 12.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 4.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 1.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 90.00 Data for Segment # 1: ThompsonRd (day/night) -------------------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 21.00 / 21.00 m Receiver height : 16.50 / 16.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: ThompsonRd (day) ------------------------------------- Source height = 1.00 m ROAD (0.00 + 64.86 + 0.00) = 64.86 dBA Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -90 90 0.23 67.25 0.00 -1.79 -0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 64.86 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Segment Leq : 64.86 dBA Total Leq All Segments: 64.86 dBA Results segment # 1: ThompsonRd (night) --------------------------------------- Source height = 1.01 m

ROAD (0.00 + 58.35 + 0.00) = 58.35 dBA Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -90 90 0.22 60.74 0.00 -1.79 -0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 58.35 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Segment Leq : 58.35 dBA Total Leq All Segments: 58.35 dBA TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 64.86 (NIGHT): 58.35  

APPENDIX C

Supporting Drawings

2 S

TO

RE

Y

BR

ICK

AN

D

ST

UC

CO

DW

ELLIN

G

GA

RA

GE

1

ST

OR

EY

BR

ICK

DW

ELLIN

G

DAYLIGHT TRIANGLE

W

O

O

D

L

A

N

D

D

R

I

P

L

I

N

E

1

0

M

S

E

T

B

A

C

K

T

O

B

E

C

O

N

F

I

R

M

E

D

13

RAMP

DOWN

52 PARKING SPACES

AMENITY

SHAFT

T

6 STOREY

140 UNIT

CONDO APARTMENT

AMENITY

5M

VISIBILITY

TRIANGLE

5M

VISIBILITY

TRIANGLE

SID

EW

ALK

PROPOSED USABLE SITE AREA =

9,363 S.M (0.94 Ha)

R

O

AD

W

ID

EN

IN

G

PRINCIPLE

ENTRANCE

SIDEWALK

AR

CH

IT

EC

TU

RA

L F

EA

TU

RE

T

O

B

E

C

O

N

F

IR

M

E

D

S

U

R

V

E

Y

E

D

W

E

T

L

A

N

D

L

IM

IT

12

13

SHAFT

SHAFT

STAIRS

EXTENT OF UNDERGROUND

EXTENT OF UNDERGROUND

ASPHALT

SIDEWALK

S

ID

E

W

A

L

K

T

O

B

E

C

O

N

F

IR

M

E

D

S

U

R

V

E

Y

E

D

W

E

T

L

A

N

D

L

IM

IT

1

5

S

E

T

B

A

C

K

W

O

O

D

L

A

N

D

D

R

I

P

L

I

N

E

T

O

B

E

C

O

N

F

I

R

M

E

D

EXTENT OF

PROPOSED

USABLE AREA

EXTENT OF UNDERGROUND

SITE AREA =

12,939 S.M (1.29 Ha)

EXTENT OF

PROPOSED

USABLE AREA

UNDEVELOPED AREA

KENNEDY CIRCLE

T

H

O

M

P

S

O

N

R

O

A

D

CO

NC

. P

AD

RE

FU

SE

B

IN

S (2)

CONC. PAD

RECYCLING BINS (24)

R

-

1

3

.

0

m

R

-

1

3

.

0

m

R

-

1

3

.

0

m

R

-

1

3

.

0

m

R

-

1

3

.

0

m

14

5 S

TO

RE

Y P

OR

TIO

N

5 STOREY PORTION

3 STOREY PORTION

ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED

No.DRAWING SETS ISSUEDDATE

(DD,MM,YY) BY

No.REVISIONS TO DRAWINGDATE

(DD,MM,YY) BY

www.knymh.com info@knymh.com

K N Y M H I N C.

1006 SKYVIEW DRIVE • SUITE 101

BURLINGTON, ONTARIO • L7P 0V1

T 905.639.6595

F 905.639.0394

ARCHITECTURE • SOLUTIONS

PLOT DATE:

DRAWING VERSION:

DRAWN BY:

DRAWING SCALE:

DETAIL NUMBER

KEY TO DETAIL LOCATION

No.

No.

DRAWING SHEET NUMBER

BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER:

DRAWING SHEET NUMBER:

PROJECT NUMBER:

DRAWING SHEET TITLE:

CHECKED BY:

19041

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT PERMIT

December 3, 2019

THOMPSON ROADMILTON, ONTARIO

NOT FOR

CONSTRUCTIO

N

Milton Thompson Rd.Ltd. Partnership

- 1. - -

THIS DOCUMENT ISPRELIMINARY AND MAY NOT BE

USED FOR REGULATORYAPPROVAL, PERMIT OR

CONSTRUCTION AND ARE FORUSE BY CONSULTANTS,

SUBCONSULTANTS, OWNERAND CONTRACTORS TO

PROVIDE THEIR INPUT TO THECOORDINATION OF THIS

DOCUMENT.

FILE

PA

TH:

TIM

ES

TAM

P:

Q:\2

019\

1904

1 - M

ilton

Tho

mps

on R

oad

Lim

ited

Par

tner

ship

- 98

1-99

5 Th

omps

on R

d S

\4. D

raw

ings

\4.0

3 S

chem

atic

Des

ign\

1904

1 - 2

019-

11-1

3 C

once

pt 6

.dw

g20

19-1

2-03

10:

43:3

8 A

M

CONTRACTOR MUST CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND JOBCONDITIONS BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH WORK

ALL DRAWINGS MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO COMMENTSFROM MUNICIPAL DEPARTMENTS AND OTHER AGENCIES WITH AUTHORITY

ALL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY OF THEARCHITECTS AND MUST BE RETURNED AT THE COMPLETION OF THE WORK

THE CONTRACTOR WORKING FROM DRAWINGS NOT SPECIFICALLY MARKED"FOR CONSTRUCTION" MUST ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY AND BEAR COSTSFOR ANY CORRECTIONS OR DAMAGES RESULTING FROM HIS OR HER WORK

PR

OJE

CT

N

OR

TH

--

AS NOTED

- - - -

001

--

A-SP1

SITE PLAN

1

A-SP1

SITE PLAN

PLANS

1:200

CONCEPT 6

UP

LOBBY

STAIRS

UTILITIES

MECHANICAL

20 17 17

16 16

157 PARKING SPACES

16

13

SHAFT

BF

BF

BF

BF

REFUSE

STAIRS

15

SH

AF

T

SHAFT

3

STAIRS

45 UG LOCKERS

24

LOCKERS

PRELIMIN

ARY

ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED

No.DRAWING SETS ISSUEDDATE

(DD,MM,YY) BY

No.REVISIONS TO DRAWINGDATE

(DD,MM,YY) BY

www.knymh.com info@knymh.com

K N Y M H I N C.

1006 SKYVIEW DRIVE • SUITE 101

BURLINGTON, ONTARIO • L7P 0V1

T 905.639.6595

F 905.639.0394

ARCHITECTURE • SOLUTIONS

PLOT DATE:

DRAWING VERSION:

DRAWN BY:

DRAWING SCALE:

DETAIL NUMBER

KEY TO DETAIL LOCATION

No.

No.

DRAWING SHEET NUMBER

BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER:

DRAWING SHEET NUMBER:

PROJECT NUMBER:

DRAWING SHEET TITLE:

CHECKED BY:

19041

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT PERMIT

September 26, 2019

THOMPSON ROADMILTON, ONTARIO

NOT FOR

CONSTRUCTIO

N

Milton Thompson Rd.Ltd. Partnership

- 1. - -

THIS DOCUMENT ISPRELIMINARY AND MAY NOT BE

USED FOR REGULATORYAPPROVAL, PERMIT OR

CONSTRUCTION AND ARE FORUSE BY CONSULTANTS,

SUBCONSULTANTS, OWNERAND CONTRACTORS TO

PROVIDE THEIR INPUT TO THECOORDINATION OF THIS

DOCUMENT.

FILE

PA

TH:

TIM

ES

TAM

P:

Q:\2

019\

1904

1 - M

ilton

Tho

mps

on R

oad

Lim

ited

Par

tner

ship

- 98

1-99

5 Th

omps

on R

d S

\4. D

raw

ings

\4.0

3 S

chem

atic

Des

ign\

1904

1 - 2

019-

09-2

4 C

once

pt 4

.dw

g20

19-0

9-26

12:

05:1

5 P

M

CONTRACTOR MUST CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND JOBCONDITIONS BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH WORK

ALL DRAWINGS MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO COMMENTSFROM MUNICIPAL DEPARTMENTS AND OTHER AGENCIES WITH AUTHORITY

ALL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY OF THEARCHITECTS AND MUST BE RETURNED AT THE COMPLETION OF THE WORK

THE CONTRACTOR WORKING FROM DRAWINGS NOT SPECIFICALLY MARKED"FOR CONSTRUCTION" MUST ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY AND BEAR COSTSFOR ANY CORRECTIONS OR DAMAGES RESULTING FROM HIS OR HER WORK

PR

OJE

CT

N

OR

TH

--

AS NOTED

- - - -

001

--

A100

FLOOR PLANS

1

A100

FLOOR PLANS

PLANS

1:200

CONCEPT 4

LOBBY

LOBBY

MAIL

VEST

MOVING

ROOM

BF

VEST

REFUSE

UTIL

1B

1B

1B

1B

1B

1B

1B

1B

1B

1B

1B

1B

1B

1B

2B

2B

AMENITY

1B 1B

2B

2B

1B

1B

1B

1B

GROUND FLOOR

3RD TO 6TH FLOORS

LOBBY

19

LOCKERS

REFUSE

1B

1B

1B

1B

1B

1B

1B

1B

1B

1B

1B

1B

1B

1B

2B

2B

2B

2B

2B

2B

1B

1B 1B

2B

2B

2ND FLOOR

1B

1B

1B

PRELIMIN

ARY

ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED

No.DRAWING SETS ISSUEDDATE

(DD,MM,YY) BY

No.REVISIONS TO DRAWINGDATE

(DD,MM,YY) BY

www.knymh.com info@knymh.com

K N Y M H I N C.

1006 SKYVIEW DRIVE • SUITE 101

BURLINGTON, ONTARIO • L7P 0V1

T 905.639.6595

F 905.639.0394

ARCHITECTURE • SOLUTIONS

PLOT DATE:

DRAWING VERSION:

DRAWN BY:

DRAWING SCALE:

DETAIL NUMBER

KEY TO DETAIL LOCATION

No.

No.

DRAWING SHEET NUMBER

BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER:

DRAWING SHEET NUMBER:

PROJECT NUMBER:

DRAWING SHEET TITLE:

CHECKED BY:

19041

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT PERMIT

September 26, 2019

THOMPSON ROADMILTON, ONTARIO

NOT FOR

CONSTRUCTIO

N

Milton Thompson Rd.Ltd. Partnership

- 1. - -

THIS DOCUMENT ISPRELIMINARY AND MAY NOT BE

USED FOR REGULATORYAPPROVAL, PERMIT OR

CONSTRUCTION AND ARE FORUSE BY CONSULTANTS,

SUBCONSULTANTS, OWNERAND CONTRACTORS TO

PROVIDE THEIR INPUT TO THECOORDINATION OF THIS

DOCUMENT.

FILE

PA

TH:

TIM

ES

TAM

P:

Q:\2

019\

1904

1 - M

ilton

Tho

mps

on R

oad

Lim

ited

Par

tner

ship

- 98

1-99

5 Th

omps

on R

d S

\4. D

raw

ings

\4.0

3 S

chem

atic

Des

ign\

1904

1 - 2

019-

09-2

4 C

once

pt 4

.dw

g20

19-0

9-26

12:

06:3

2 P

M

CONTRACTOR MUST CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND JOBCONDITIONS BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH WORK

ALL DRAWINGS MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO COMMENTSFROM MUNICIPAL DEPARTMENTS AND OTHER AGENCIES WITH AUTHORITY

ALL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY OF THEARCHITECTS AND MUST BE RETURNED AT THE COMPLETION OF THE WORK

THE CONTRACTOR WORKING FROM DRAWINGS NOT SPECIFICALLY MARKED"FOR CONSTRUCTION" MUST ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY AND BEAR COSTSFOR ANY CORRECTIONS OR DAMAGES RESULTING FROM HIS OR HER WORK

PR

OJE

CT

N

OR

TH

--

AS NOTED

- - - -

001

--

A101

FLOOR PLANS

CONCEPT 4

2 S

TO

RE

Y

BR

ICK

AN

D

ST

UC

CO

DW

ELLIN

G

GA

RA

GE

1

ST

OR

EY

BR

ICK

DW

ELLIN

G

DAYLIGHT TRIANGLE

W

O

O

D

L

A

N

D

D

R

I

P

L

I

N

E

1

0

M

S

E

T

B

A

C

K

T

O

B

E

C

O

N

F

I

R

M

E

D

13

RAMP

DOWN

52 PARKING SPACES

AMENITY

SHAFT

T

6 STOREY

138 UNIT

CONDO APARTMENT

SID

EW

ALK

PROPOSED USABLE SITE AREA =

9,239 S.M (0.92 Ha)

R

O

AD

W

ID

EN

IN

G

PRINCIPLE

ENTRANCE

SIDEWALK

AR

CH

IT

EC

TU

RA

L F

EA

TU

RE

T

O

B

E

C

O

N

F

IR

M

E

D

S

U

R

V

E

Y

E

D

W

E

T

L

A

N

D

L

IM

IT

12

13

SHAFT

SHAFT

STAIRS

EXTENT OF UNDERGROUND

EXTENT OF UNDERGROUND

ASPHALT

SIDEWALK

S

ID

E

W

A

L

K

T

O

B

E

C

O

N

F

IR

M

E

D

S

U

R

V

E

Y

E

D

W

E

T

L

A

N

D

L

IM

IT

1

5

S

E

T

B

A

C

K

W

O

O

D

L

A

N

D

D

R

I

P

L

I

N

E

T

O

B

E

C

O

N

F

I

R

M

E

D

EXTENT OF

PROPOSED

USABLE AREA

EXTENT OF UNDERGROUND

SITE AREA =

12,939 S.M (1.29 Ha)

EXTENT OF

PROPOSED

USABLE AREA

UNDEVELOPED AREA

KENNEDY CIRCLE

T

H

O

M

P

S

O

N

R

O

A

D

C

O

N

C

. P

A

D

R

E

F

U

S

E

B

IN

S

(2

)

R

-

1

3

.

0

m

R

-

1

3

.

0

m

4 S

TO

RE

Y P

OR

TIO

N

5 STOREY PORTION

3 STOREY PORTION

C

O

N

C

. P

A

D

R

E

C

Y

C

L

IN

G

B

IN

S

(2

0

)

7

2

5

AMENITY

5M

VISIBILITY

TRIANGLE

5M

VISIBILITY

TRIANGLE

APPROX

FUTURE

DRIVEWAY

LOCATION

EX

TE

NT

O

F U

ND

ER

GR

OU

ND

EXTENT OF

PROPOSED

USABLE AREA

HALTON GARBAGE

T-TURNAROUND

FIRE ROUTE

10 BICYCLE SPACES

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V V V V V V V

V

V

V

V

V

V

V

98 B

IC

YC

LE

S

PA

CE

S

LO

CA

TE

D IN

SID

E B

UILD

IN

G

ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED

No.DRAWING SETS ISSUEDDATE

(DD,MM,YY) BY

No.REVISIONS TO DRAWINGDATE

(DD,MM,YY) BY

www.knymh.com info@knymh.com

K N Y M H I N C.

1006 SKYVIEW DRIVE • SUITE 101

BURLINGTON, ONTARIO • L7P 0V1

T 905.639.6595

F 905.639.0394

ARCHITECTURE • SOLUTIONS

PLOT DATE:

DRAWING VERSION:

DRAWN BY:

DRAWING SCALE:

DETAIL NUMBER

KEY TO DETAIL LOCATION

No.

No.

DRAWING SHEET NUMBER

BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER:

DRAWING SHEET NUMBER:

PROJECT NUMBER:

DRAWING SHEET TITLE:

CHECKED BY:

19041

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT PERMIT

December 13, 2019

THOMPSON ROADMILTON, ONTARIO

NOT FOR

CONSTRUCTIO

N

Milton Thompson Rd.Ltd. Partnership

- 1. - -

THIS DOCUMENT ISPRELIMINARY AND MAY NOT BE

USED FOR REGULATORYAPPROVAL, PERMIT OR

CONSTRUCTION AND ARE FORUSE BY CONSULTANTS,

SUBCONSULTANTS, OWNERAND CONTRACTORS TO

PROVIDE THEIR INPUT TO THECOORDINATION OF THIS

DOCUMENT.

FILE

PA

TH:

TIM

ES

TAM

P:

Q:\2

019\

1904

1 - M

ilton

Tho

mps

on R

oad

Lim

ited

Par

tner

ship

- 98

1-99

5 Th

omps

on R

d S

\4. D

raw

ings

\4.0

3 S

chem

atic

Des

ign\

1904

1 - 2

019-

12-1

3 C

once

pt 7

.dw

g20

19-1

2-13

3:3

9:55

PM

CONTRACTOR MUST CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND JOBCONDITIONS BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH WORK

ALL DRAWINGS MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO COMMENTSFROM MUNICIPAL DEPARTMENTS AND OTHER AGENCIES WITH AUTHORITY

ALL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY OF THEARCHITECTS AND MUST BE RETURNED AT THE COMPLETION OF THE WORK

THE CONTRACTOR WORKING FROM DRAWINGS NOT SPECIFICALLY MARKED"FOR CONSTRUCTION" MUST ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY AND BEAR COSTSFOR ANY CORRECTIONS OR DAMAGES RESULTING FROM HIS OR HER WORK

PR

OJE

CT

N

OR

TH

--

AS NOTED

- - - -

001

--

A-SP1

SITE PLAN

1

A-SP1

SITE PLAN

PLANS

1:200

CONCEPT 7