G2 JA JB

˙ 承受及時荷重˙ 立即植入˙ 自攻能力，免鑽頭˙ 理想螺紋設計˙ 安全雙頭設計˙ 無需翻瓣˙ 鈦合金材質˙ 易取出˙ 適用90% case˙ Collar設計，保護牙齦˙ 免施壓，輕易旋轉置入

直 徑 長 度

6868106810

矯正釘尺寸(mm)

1.4

1.6

2.0

矯正釘

把手

Driver(長)

Driver(短)

Predrill

盒子

5支

1支

1支

1支

1支

1個

詳情請洽各區服務據點～

北區（０２）２７３１－５２２９

中區（０４）２３９５－１６３９

南區（０６）２６８－３３５９P1

特惠實施中

聯雄健康事業股份有限公司

Tel ：（02）2731-5229Fax：（02）2731-6928

Adds：10694 台北市大安區光復南路102號5樓

E-mail：implant.com@msa.hinet.net

http://www.shogun.com.tw第八十四期 2012 年 2月 1日發行

產 品 快 訊

衛署醫器輸字第018501號

矯正釘簡配組內容

P2接 下 頁

學 術 文 章

P2

Pericardium Membrane and Xenograft Particulate Grafting Materials for Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Defects (Part ll) 作者: Marius Steigmann, Dr. medic. stom

出處: http://www.ws-fusion.com/index.php

Fig. 5. Thin ridge is inadequate for implant placement. Staged procedure is needed. Fig. 6. Membrane (Tutortent® pericardium) is fixatod with pins, and the defect is fillod with xenograft (Navigratt 228). Fig. 7. Membrane is fixated labially only by the flap in position.Fig. 8. Increased bone ridge with adequate bone fur implant. Appropriate diameter is found after 6 months.

There were 2 patients (7implant sites) who received staged dental implants. Of those, 1 implant had exposed threads requiring regafting at implant placement. All implants except 1 could be placed because of adequate ridge width, This site was treated with a small diameter implant.

DISCUSSION In a rat study by Schwarz, in histologic and histometric analysis after 8 weeks following implantation, the pericardium membrane showed approximately 60% of membrane thickness measured after 2 weeks. The Tutodent® membrane body seemed to be structured like an interconnected porous system. Histologic analysis 2 weeks following implantation revealed that merely half the Tutodent® membrane body was vascularized. After 16 weeks, the Tutodent® was almost entirely organized and replaced by newly formed connective tissue. After 24 weeks, a nearly complete biodegradation and substitution of the membrane by newly formed connective tissue was observed.

Clinical Measurements According to the previously described technique, after flap elevation, ridge width was measured using a periodontal probe (Stoma Dentalsysteme, Emmingen Liptingen, Germany) exactly at the midpoint of the programmed implant position. The probe was placed at the most coronal level of the crest, perpendicularly to the apico-coronal axis of the crest. One measure for each implant site was registered in each patient. At the implant placement surgical stage, the measurement of the crest width was performed exactly in the same manner as before for each programmed implant site, and the difference between before and after the augmentation procedure was calculated (Table 2). For the cases with simultaneous placement, measurements were made after uncovering.

Implant Surgery The implants were placed at 24 weeks following ridge exposure for the staged cases (Figs. 5-8). Suitability for placing implants was assessed based on sufficient ridge width. Any sites unsuitable for placement were recorded as failures. The changes in mean ridge height and mean ridge width were evaluated. All implants were submerged (Tapered ScrewVent Zimmer Dental). If threads were exposed in the staged case, they were resorbable interrupted sutures. Written and verbal postoperative instructions were provided. The implants were surgically exposed, and healing abutments were connected to the implants.

RESULTS The change in alveolar ridge width varied from a loss of 0.2 mm to a gain of 5.8 mm, with a mean gain of 3.0364 mm (Table 2). Compared to the baseline measurement, the change was statistically significant P < 0.001 (t test). However, the number of sites is too limited for a real evaluation. There were 19 implant sites that gained ≦2 mm and 8 sites ≧3.0 mm. Seventeen mandibular and 1 maxillary localized alveolar ridge defect was treated (Table 2).

全文完

P3

The same investigator describes the resorption time at 8-16 weeks. Another study from Rothamel showed that the pericardium membrane promoted the attachment and proliferation of human periodontal ligament fibroblasts and human osteoblasts. In a study of 66 sites in 40 patients with autogenous bone blocks and particles from the chin or retromolar regions, and having placed expanded polytetrafluoroethylene barrier membranes, Buser et al reported a mean ridge width gain of 3.53 mm. In another study, Parodi et al used bioresorbable collagen sponges with a bioresorbable collagen barrier in 16 sites in 16 patients to achieve a mean gain of 2.49 mm. Fugazzotto performed 302 consecutive ridge augmentation procedures in 284 patients with Gore Tex® (W. L.Gore & Assoc., Inc., Newark, DE) membranes in conjunction with various nonautogenous particulale materials. A total of 574 implants were placed in the augmented 279 buccolingual augmented ridges, which rep¬resented an overall success rate of 96%. The implant survival rate after augmentation was 97% for the uncovered implants. Knapp et al measured 12 patients with inadequate dental alveolar ridge widths using bioactive glass alloplast and a titanium-reinforced PTFE barrier. The change in ridge width varied in their study from a loss of 1mm to a gain of 4.5 mm, with a mean gain of 1-1 mm (P < 0.03). Mean ridge width gain was 1.1 mm for both maxillary and mandibular sites. There was no measurement of success in cases of dehiscence. The objective of (this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using a pericardium collagen membrane in combination with 2 different xenograft grafting materials to augment localized deficient alveolar ridges in preparation for dental implants.To accomplish this objective, the changes in ridge width were measured. Collagen pericardium membranes were used in conjunction with various nonautogenous particulate materials. Of 19 sites, 18 showed sufficient regenerated hard tissues for standard implant placement in ideal prosthetic positions. There was 1 site that did not show sufficient regenerated hard tissues for standard implant. In this case, a smaller diameter implant was used. The mean ridge width change of 3.0364 mm can be compared to changes in ridge width reported in other augmentation studies, keeping in mind that materials and methods vary.

In this study, all implants were placed, and only 1 needed regrafting The change in ridge width varied in this study from a loss of 0.2, which was treated with a small diameter implant (described previously) connected to 2 standard implants, to a gain of 5.8 mm.

CONCLUSION When used in conjunction with nonautogenous particulate materials, pericardium membranes (Tutodent® have been successful in effecting bone regeneration in the treatment of 19 consecutive atrophic edentulous implant sites. Such augmentation showed clinical success in a buccolingual (horizontal) direction. There was 1 clinician that performed this study. Other studies involving more clinicians and histologic evaluations are necessary to evaluate the material combination presented in this study.

Table 2. Clinical Evaluation of Horizontal Bone Augmentation With Tutodent® Membrane for Each Implant Site Before and After Augmentation

There were 6 patients (12 implants) treated with the staged GBR procedure. Placement was measured in 2 patients (7 implants) treated with simultaneously grafting and implant placement bone width at baseline and uncovering/implant. The change in alveolar ridge width varied from a loss of 0.2mm to a gain of 5.8mm, with a mean gain of 3.0364 mm.

Measurement

for EachImplantPosition

No.Implants

BeforeAugmentatio

n(staged

procedure)

BeforeAugmentation(simutaneousl

yimplant

placement)

AfterAugmentatio

n

RidgeWidth

Change(mm)

1 3 2 7 52.2 7.2 52.4 7.2 4.8

2 2 2.4 7.6 5.43 7.8 5.8

3 3 3.5 6.2 2.73.2 5.5 2.33.2 3.0 -02

4 1 3 6 35 1 4.3 6.6 2.36 4 4.2 6 1.8

3.0 5.8 2.83.2 5.8 2.66.5 6.4 0.2

7 3 3 6.2 3.22.8 6.0 3.82.5 5.7 3.5

8 2 4.8 6.3 1.55.0 7.2 2.2

19 implants 57.9

Misch Study Group

主辦單位: 中山醫學大學牙醫學系校友總會

協辦單位: 聯雄健康事業股份有限公司

時 間: 每月第一或第二週

週五晚上10:30-12:00地 點: 台北市大安區光復南路102號5樓

備 註: 酌收學分申請費 100元/場

報名專線:(02) 2731-5229

日 期 講 題 講 師

How to deal with severely atrophic maxillary ridge using either PRP, PRF or combination

陳建志 醫師

How to create the ideal environment for implants (part 2) 劉致遠 醫師

Update of treatment in peri-implantitis 高宇鋒 醫師

軟硬組織的處理 黃斌洋 醫師

Mandibular implant overdenture with attachment 賴俊憲 醫師

Consideration of prosthesis in esthetic zone 常預德 醫師

Socket preservation ridge augmentation-rationale Technique, and clinical application 曾世昌 醫師

全口植牙重建 溫世政 醫師

美國西雅圖人頭顱課程

3月份講師 鄭浩鴻 醫師國立台灣大學牙醫學士台大醫院牙科部醫師美國哈佛大學牙周植牙專科美國加州大學洛杉磯分校美容牙醫專科國際電腦鑲瓷學會會員

2012 Mish Study Group 北區讀書會

講題: 植牙的價值

P4

Misch Study Group 讀 書 會學分/場

TAIPEI

(暫定)

7 月

8月10日

9月 7日

10月12日

11月 9日

12月 7日

4月13日

5月11日

6月 8日