nikolaos fragakis - livemedia.gr · case presentation ii 43 year-old female symptoms: no...
TRANSCRIPT
Nikolaos Fragakis
Assistant Professor, FESC
3rd University Cardiology DepartmentHippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki
When to ablate patients with prematureventricular complexes?
Case presentation I• 58 – year-old female
• Symptoms: palpitations associated with dizziness either in exercise orat rest
• Holter: frequent monomorphic PVC’S and episodes of short runs ofNSVT
• Echo: normal
• Ex. Test: negative for ischeamia
• Medications: Failure of various antiarrhythmic drugs: b-blocker,verapamil, sotalol
Case presentation ITherapeutical Options
• Amiodarone
• RF ablation
• Nothing
• Referral to someone else
Short term success rate 70-90%Limited data on long –term success rate
RF catheter
Case presentation II
43 year-old female Symptoms: No disturbing, occasionally palpitations Holter: Monomorhic PVC’S>25000/24hr single or couples Echo: mildly abnormal LV function (EF= 45-50%) Ex. Test: negative for ischeamia MRI : No evidence of ARVC, no other abnormalities Medications: Failure of various antiarrhythmic drugs: b-blocker,amiodarone
Case presentation II
Options
• Nothing
• follow-up in 6/12 or 12/12?
• RF ablation
• Referral to someone else
Critical Questions raised from this case
• Does PVCs induced cardiomyopathy exist?
• Is it reversible?
• Is ablation an effective therapy in this groupof patients?
• How long should we wait before we applytherapy?
J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:364 –70
PVC- Induced Cardiomyopathyepidemiology
v PVC-induced cardiomyopathy was proposed by Duffee et al (1998)when pharmacological suppression of PVCs in pts with presumedidiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy subsequently improved LV systolicdysfunction.
Duffee DF et al. Mayo Clin Proc. 1998;73:430-3
v 22 year old female symptomatic pt, > 25000PVCs/24hr, LBBB inferior
axis 6 months after ablation EF 43% 58% LVEDD 65mm 57mm Chugh SS et al. JCE 2000;11:328-9
Putative mechanisms of PVCsinduced Cardiomyopathy
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012;5:229-236
2
>20.000/day
5.000-200001000-5000
n=289 pts
Heart 2009;95:1230–1237.
Heart 2009;95:1230–1237.
Heart Rhythm 2010;7:865–869
Circulation. 2005;112:1092-1097
Other Predisposing Factors ofVPC-Induced Cardiomyopathy• VPC QRS width (>140 ms)• burden of interpolated VPCs• presence of NSVT• multiform VPCs• VPCs of right ventricular origin del Carpio Munoz F, et al. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2011;22:791-8Yokokawa M, et al. Heart Rhythm 2012;9:1460-4Olgun H, et al. Heart Rhythm 2011;8:1046-9
European Journal of Heart Failure 2012;14:112–1120
Proposed electrocardiogram algorithm forpredicting VPC-induced pulmonarycapillary wedge pressure augmentation
European Journal of Heart Failure 2012;14:112–1120
European Journal of Heart Failure 2012;14:112–1120
Europace 2013;15:735–741
Critical Questions raised from this case
• Does PVCs induced cardiomyopathy exist?
• Is it reversible?
• Is ablation an effective therapy in this groupof patients?
• How long should we wait before we applytherapy?
Critical Questions raised from this case
• Does PVCs induced cardiomyopathy exist?
• Is it reversible?
• Is ablation an effective therapy in this groupof patients?
• How long should we wait before we applytherapy?
Studies Demonstrating Improvement ofLV Function after VPC treatments with
RFA
Chen T et al. J Cardiac Fail 2013;19:40-49
controls
Heart Rhythm 2007;4:863– 867
Heart Rhythm 2013;10:172–175
PVC-induced cardiomyopathy resolves within 4 months of successful ablationin most patients
Critical Questions raised from this case
• Does PVCs induced cardiomyopathy exist?
• Is it reversible?
• Is ablation an effective therapy in this groupof patients?
• How long should we wait before we applytherapy?
Heart Rhythm 2012;9:92–95
Am J Cardiol 2012;110:852– 856
Heart Rhythm 2012;9:1465–1472
J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:1288 –94
Europace 2009;11:771–817
Conclusions I• PVC ablation efficacy and safety are reasonably
good but limitations should be respected
• The majority of pt with high density PVC do notdevelop cardiomyopathy
• PVC induced cardiomyopathy is usually
reversible
Conclusions IIv the suppression of PVCs is indicated for symptomatic pts with
frequent PVCs and those with overt LV dysfunction
v no evidence for the treatment of asymptomatic patients withnormal LVEF to prevent PVC induced cardiomyopathy
v In pts with decreased LVEF, a follow-up period of 3 to 12months after RF is suggested to allow for recovery of LVfunction
v Further research is needed to identify the risk predictors fordeveloping PVC induced cardiomyopathy and to make arecommendation on the need and frequency of echo follow-up