new_effect of magnetic fields on coherent spectroscopy
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent
Spectroscopy of Alkali Atoms
Leah MargalitUnder the supervision of
Prof. Arlene Wilson-Gordon
Department of Chemistry
Bar-Ilan University
![Page 2: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Introduction
Energy levels of 87Rb267 MHz
157 MHz
794.7nm 780nm
6835 MHz
812 MHz72 MHz
(a) (b)
1gF 6835 MHz
1gF
2gF 2gF
1eF
eF =2 1eF
eF =3
eF =0
2eF
21/25 S
21/25 P
21/25 S
23/25 P
The fine and hyperfine energy levels of (a) D1 line and (b) D2 line of 87Rb.
![Page 3: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Introduction
Zeeman Effect
Fg=1
Fg=2
Fe=1
Fe=2
5S1/2
5P1/2
794.7nm
6835MHz
812MHz
-1
-1
-1
-11
0 1
1
10
0
02
2
2
2
In the presence of a magnetic field
The magnetic field lifts the )2F+1(
degeneracy in eachhyperfine level by:
B F FE g BM
![Page 4: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Introduction
Selection rules and light polarization
B
z
x
y
1() M
1() M
1() M
0() M 0
1
-10
![Page 5: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Introduction
Coherence effects: Coherent Population Trapping (CPT)
g1g2
e
Two-photon or Raman resonance when
Fields are equally intense
Population trapped in lower levels and maximal coherence created
Zero absorption at line center )/=0(
1 2
1 2
![Page 6: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Pump – probe configuration
![Page 7: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The Hanle configuration
Introduction
B
t
Zero crossing
-0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.10.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Bz (G)
Abs
orpt
ion
(cm
-1)
B
Abs
orpt
ion
![Page 8: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
CPT applications
Introduction
Atomic clock Magnetometry Slow light
![Page 9: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Motivation
-1
-1 1
10
0-2 2
-1 10-2 2 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
x 108
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
[Hz]
Pro
be a
bs
Introduction
![Page 10: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Motivation
-1
-1 1
10
0-2 2
-1 10-2 2
B
Introduction
![Page 11: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
We examined the effect of different magneticfields on the absorption spectrum of alkali atoms.
Static magnetic field )dc( Oscillating magnetic field )ac(
Longitudinal to the light propagation direction )LMF(
transverse to the light propagation direction )TMF(
B B
BB
kk
I. Degenerate Two Level System )DTLS(. II. Three level Lambda System.
Content
![Page 12: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Hanle configuration Pump- probe configuration
I. Degenerate two-level system in presence of TMF
![Page 13: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
TMF in DTLS
Simplest CPT transition: Fg=1 Fe=0
The quantization axis is chosen to be along the axis of light propagation.
The TMF leads to the transfer of population to adjacent Zeeman sublevels.
The quantization axis is chosen to be along the total magnetic field .
The linear polarization now becomes + polarization.
There are two theoretical approaches to dealing with the presence of a transverse magnetic field (TMF) in addition to a LMF.
![Page 14: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Hanle configuration
TMF in DTLS L. Margalit, M. Rosenbluh and A. D. Wilson-Gordon PRA 87, 033808 (2013)
-0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.10.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Bz (G)
Abs
orpt
ion
(cm
-1)
-0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.10.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Bz (G)
Abs
orpt
ion
(cm
-1)
Bx=0
Bx=0.01G
Peak at Bz=0 and dips at Bz =± Bx/2.
numerical results for Fg=1 Fe=0 transition in presence of TMF
![Page 15: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Hanle configuration numerical results for Fg=1 Fe=0 transition in presence of TMF
TMF in DTLS L. Margalit, M. Rosenbluh and A. D. Wilson-Gordon PRA 87, 033808 (2013)
-0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.10.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Bz (G)
Abs
orpt
ion
(cm
-1)
0 0.25 0.50
5
10
15
Bx (G)
Spl
ittin
g (M
Hz)
Bx=0
Bx=0.01G
![Page 16: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
TMF in DTLS
Simplified Bloch equations (resonant pump)
1 1 1 1 3 1
3 1 3 1 1 2 1
2 1 2 1 2 1 1 3 1
1 ) '( ) (,
) 2 '( 2 2 ,
) '( )1 3 (.
eg eg g g g g
g g g g eg g g
g g g g g e g g g g
i iV
i iV iA
i iV iA
1 1 1 1
1
21
1 1
2 )1 3 (,
) '( ) '(g g g g
eg
iV iA VD
i d
2 2 2
1
2 41 ,) '() 2 '(
V d A VDi i d
2) '() 2 '( 2d i i A
Solution
11 1where / , , A / 2B z F eg B x FB g B g
Absorption has maximum at =0 )Bz=0(,
and minima at = A )Bz = Bx/2(.
![Page 17: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
TMF in DTLS
Ground-state populations
-0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.10.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Bz (G)
Pop
ulat
ion
of F
g=1, m
F=1
-0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.10.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Bz (G)
popu
latio
n of
Fg=1
, mF=0
(b)(a)The redistribution of the population by the combined effects of the TMF and the collisions cause to population trapping in the Zeeman sublevels.
1, 1g gF m
without magnetic field
with TMF
![Page 18: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Degree of coherence: Sij=|ij|2/iijj
TMF in DTLS
![Page 19: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
E B
||E B
TMF leads to formation of two new systems!!!
TMF in DTLS
The quantization axis is chosen to be along the
total magnetic field .
-0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.10.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Bz (G)
Abs
orpt
ion
(cm
-1)
Bx=0
Bx=0.01G
![Page 20: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
TMF in DTLS
-0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
0.55
Bz [G]
Abs
orpt
ion
[cm
-1]
0
1
2
3
4
5
(a)
Adding ByThis method can be generalized to any transverse magnetic field in the xy plane by changing the direction of the polarization .
Varying angle between linear polarization and TMF:deepest dips when they are parallel
-4 -2 0 2 40.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0.04
[Degree]
Spl
ittin
g [G
]
(b)
![Page 21: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Pump-probe configurationnumerical results for Fg=1 Fe=0 transition in presence of LMF and TMF
-0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
2 (MHz)
Pro
be a
bsor
ptio
n (c
m-1
)
b
c d
a
TMF in DTLS
a. No magnetic field.
b. only LMF
c. only TMF
d. LMF and TMF
LMF shifts spectrum, TMF splits spectrum
![Page 22: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
II. Coherence-population-trapping transients induced by an acmagnetic field
![Page 23: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
LMF modulation
The Atomic system
D1 line of 87Rb
![Page 24: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
LMF modulation
0 0 0 0sin ) ( , 4 , 0.3ms2
B B t t B G t L. Margalit, M. Rosenbluh and A. D. Wilson-Gordon, PRA 85, 063809 (2012)
Transient sequence
![Page 25: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
LMF modulation
Transient components
![Page 26: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
LMF modulation
Resonant pump, detuned probe
Sequence of transients
DHCT – deviation from half-cycle time ;no change in presence of buffer gas
Applications: Magnetometry
200Hz200Hz & Bdc=0.2G
![Page 27: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
III. Coherent-population-trapping transients induced by amodulated transverse magnetic field
![Page 28: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
TMF modulation
Steady-state absorption in presence of different magnetic fields
In total (4I+1) dips .
: Two photon detuning: Zeeman splitting between adjacent sublevels
a. No MF
b. only LMF )=0, 2(
c. LMF and TMF )=0, , 2, 3(
d. only TMF )=, 3(
L. Margalit, M. Rosenbluh and A. D. Wilson-Gordon, PRA 88, 023827 (2013)
See K. Cox et al. PRA 83, 015801 (2011)
-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.52
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
(MHz)
Pro
be A
bsor
ptio
n (c
m-1
)
a
1
-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.52
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
(MHz)
Pro
be A
bsor
ptio
n (c
m-1
)
a
b
1
-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.52
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
(MHz)
Pro
be A
bsor
ptio
n (c
m-1
)
a
b
c
2
3
1
-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.52
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
(MHz)
Pro
be A
bsor
ptio
n (c
m-1
)
a
b
cd
2
3
1
![Page 29: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
TMF modulation
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
t (ms)P
robe
Abs
orpt
ion
(cm
-1)
Bx=0 Bx=0
total probe
2
3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
-0.1
0
0.1TMF
TMF
(G)
Effect of modulating TMF on probe absorption at point 1: zero Raman detuning =0 c b
All the Λ subsystems with δ=0 energy difference between the lower sublevels, in the presence of TMF.
2,4 5 6
00.1z xB B G
-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.52
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
(MHz)
Pro
be A
bsor
ptio
n (c
m-1
)
b
c
1
![Page 30: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
TMF modulation
TMF Modulation in the absence of Bz
The time evolution in this case is similar to that obtained in the presence of a modulated LMF
∆=0, point 1 ∆= -30, point 3
There are two sets of transients: the transients that occur just after the TMF reaches its maximal absolute value and the transients that occur immediately after the TMF passes through zero
-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.52
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
(MHz)
Pro
be A
bsor
ptio
n (c
m-1
)
a
b
cd
2
3
1
![Page 31: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
TMF modulation
TMF modulation as a function of detuning in the absence of LMF
0xB
![Page 32: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Summery
Conclusions The absorption spectra in DTLS are split in the presence of a TMF and
that the splitting is proportional to the magnitude of the TMF.
The TMF leads to the creation of new two-photon detuned subsystems formed by the Zeeman sublevels.
The effects of LMF and TMF are distinguished from each other.
LMF modulation- variation in the contributions to the absorption that derive from the original subsystems due to their entry and exit from CPT.
TMF modulation - creation and destruction of new subsystems.
![Page 33: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Acknowledgments
AcknowledgmentsProf Arlene Wilson-GordonThe Chemistry department, Bar Ilan University
Prof Michael Rosenblue, head of the Physics department, Bar Ilan University
Prof Ferruccio Renzoni. The Physics and Astronomy department, of the University College London.
Prof Dimitry Budker, the Physics department, Berkeley University
![Page 34: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Coupling of surfaceplasmon resonances
![Page 35: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
motivationTo understand the coupling nature of metal nano-holes surface plasmons and investigate its polarization influence in terms of hybridization model.
200nm
![Page 36: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Surface plasmons Surface plasmon resonances – the collective coherence oscillation
of conduction electrons in metallic nanostructure .
![Page 37: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
CTC=350nm CTC=400nm CTC=450nm
Surface plasmon in 2D hole arrays
Plasmon wavelength increases with the periodicity.
3
![Page 38: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
The Hybridization model
Changing the polarization results in scanning the various modes exist in the system.
![Page 39: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Nano fabrication
CTC= 400 nm
CTC= 500 nm
CTC= 600 nm
CTC= 700 nm
CTC= 300 nm
CTC=250 nm
1
3
3
nm4001 2
![Page 40: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
[nm]300 400 500 600 700 800 900
180
190
200
210
220
230
240
CTC= 400 nm
CTC= 500 nm
CTC= 600 nm
CTC= 700 nm
CTC= 300 nm
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 10000
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
[nm]
CTC=700nmCTC=600nmCTC=500nmCTC=400nmCTC=300nm
The dimers mode and its amplitude is change as a function of the dimers distance.
Spectral measurements
![Page 41: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy (KPFM) measurement
Plasmoelectric surface potential as large as 100mV. Energy application: Conversion of optical power to an electric potential!
AFM: height topography Surface potential
![Page 42: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Height mergepotential
A change in the surface potential in the vicinity of the structures
Height Potential Merge
![Page 43: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Thank you for the listening!
![Page 44: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
![Page 45: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
![Page 46: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
LMF modulation
47
Why is Λ1 is more oscillatory than Λ3?
Lower level coherence of Λ1 and Λ3
Two processes occur simultaneously in the system: energy change of the sublevels and transfer of population.
A single Λ system: only the amplitudes of the oscillations change when the initial population of the system is changed.
![Page 47: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
LMF modulation
48
When during the time evolution of a system some parameter is suddenly changed in a significant way, the system undergoes for a while a complicated dynamic evolution that it is a transient and then a stationary state is reached.
What is a transient?
1 .Until the system achieves CPT 2 .CPT is first established and then a change is been made.
Jyotsna and Agarwal, PRA 52, 3147 )1995(. Valente et al. PRA 65, 023814 )2002(.
![Page 48: new_Effect of Magnetic Fields on Coherent Spectroscopy](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070512/589daec41a28ab21728b5fa3/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
49LMF modulation
1. Initially, pop =1/8 in each mg’ Zeeman sublevel.
2. Constant magnetic field traps pop in sublevel Fg’=2, mg’=2 (trap state).
3. At same time, clock transition 2 which is always in two-photon resonance enters dark state.
4. As B0, 1,3 and TLS become resonant and pumping from them is more efficient.
5. At B=0, 1,3 exhibit CPT and then population flows into these subsystems from the trap state.
6. As |B| increases again, pop flows back into trap state.
Population evolution
The transfer of population occurs via decay to a reservoir (γ ) and collisional decay rate which are the same for 1 and 3.
Pop transfer from trap state goes mainly to the nearby 3 rather than 1, which leads to damping of the oscillations in lower-level coherence.
Increasing the Rabi frequency in a single system leads to the same effect.