new technologies and human enhancement

Upload: gluckspilz-fliegenpilz

Post on 03-Jun-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    1/65

    New Technologies and

    Human Enhancement

    prof. J. SavulescuUniversity of Oxford, Uehiro

    Centre for Practical Ethics

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    2/65

    Human Enhancement and

    Biological Liberation

    From Supermouse to

    Superhuman

    Program on the Ethics of the New Biosciences, Suite 8, Littlegate House, St Ebbes Street,

    Oxford

    Julian Savulescu, Director

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    3/65

    Scientists at Case Western Reserve University created agenetically engineered mouse runs for up to six hours at a speed of 20 metres per minute

    before needing a rest changes to the metabolism of glucose in the blood.

    glucose metabolising gene - PEPCK-C is over-expressed in theskeletal muscle-

    Metabolically similar to Lance Armstrong biking up thePyrenees; they utilize mainly fatty acids for energy and producevery little lactic acid'.

    Purpose:

    to study the effects of diet and exercise on longevity and cancerrisk and better understand the genetic basis of inheritedconditions which lead to muscle wasting in humans

    Supermouse

    Program on the Ethics of the New Biosciences, Suite 8, Littlegate House, St Ebbes Street,

    Oxford

    Julian Savulescu, Director

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    4/65

    More Active: 7 times more cage activity than normal mice

    Greater Endurance: Ran 6km on a treadmill (Normal mouse0.2)

    Improved metabolism: ate 60% more but had half the bodyweight and only 10% of the body fat of a normal mouse

    Extended lifespan: survived longer and looked healthier

    Extended youthfulness: mice of 30 months still twice as fastas 6 month old normal mice and reproductively active at 21months (and up to 30 months)

    Healthier: Lower Cholesterol levels

    Supermouse: The Improvements

    Program on the Ethics of the New Biosciences, Suite 8, Littlegate House, St Ebbes Street,

    Oxford

    Julian Savulescu, Director

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    5/65

    Table 1. Top 10 genetic enhancements

    The Doogie MouseBetter memory through overexpression of the receptor subunit NR2B

    Color Vision MiceAdding human photopigment allows (at least females) to see new colors.

    Methuselah MiceBy reducing growth hormone levels long-lived dwarf mice can be produced. The current recordholder survived 4 years 11 months and 3 weeks, while normal mice have a two year lifespan.

    Monogamous VolesNormally polygamous voles can be turned monogamous (and more social) by changing thevassopressin V1a receptor.

    Regenerating MRL MiceThese mice regenerate holes punched in their ears as well as some injuries to heartmuscle. (accidental breeding rather than genetic engineering).

    Schwarzenegger Mice and Belgian Blue Cows Increased muscle mass through myostatin knockout. Occursnaturally in cows and humans.

    Hard Working Monkeys Monkeys tend to slack off until they get close to a reward they have to work for. Ifinjected with a DNA construct that blocks the D2 receptor they work at an even rate.

    Anticancer Mice Immune systems that kill cancer cells efficiently and can even help other mice through bloodtransfusions.

    Antiobesi ty Mice Protected from obesity and diabetes by their lack the enzyme DGAT1. Their fat tissue can evenreduce obesity and glucose buildup in other mice if transplanted.

    Marathon Mice: Overexpress PPAR in their muscles- turn into slow twitch fibers that work well for long-distancerunning. More endurance and increased resistance to obesity.

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    6/65

    Biological Liberation

    biological liberation being liberated from the biological constraints

    evolution placed on us.

    the reason there are no supermen, like the reason

    there are no naturally occurring supermice is that itwould have been evolutionarily disadvantageous,given previous environments, to require the vastamounts of food resources to produce this

    advantage in speed, endurance and reproduction

    Program on the Ethics of the New Biosciences, Suite 8, Littlegate House, St Ebbes Street,

    Oxford

    Julian Savulescu, Director

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    7/65

    Biological Liberation Our biochemistry is set to Pleistocene

    conditions But today, we have a superabundance of

    food in the West

    We could easily provide the calories to run at thisspeed.

    Whereas evolution may have had good reason

    not to produce supermen, we could.

    Program on the Ethics of the New Biosciences, Suite 8, Littlegate House, St Ebbes Street,

    Oxford

    Julian Savulescu, Director

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    8/65

    Biological Liberation our lives when we reproduce, whether we get cancer

    or heart disease, how long we live, how we performmentally and physically are determined in large partby very basic biochemical cycles in our bodies.

    differences between us are often the function of very

    small differences in biology. we can now change these basic cycles with radical

    results. possibility of humans being twice as fast, living twice as long,

    reproducing at 80, not aging, being mentally and physicallymuch quicker is not science fiction.

    Program on the Ethics of the New Biosciences, Suite 8, Littlegate House, St Ebbes Street,

    Oxford

    Julian Savulescu, Director

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    9/65

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    10/65

    36

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    RadicalAlterationofHumans

    CurrentPossibilities

    Transgenesis

    Chimeras

    HumanAnimal

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    11/65

    37

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    12/65

    38

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    Transgenesis

    Currentuses

    Medicalresearchchromosome21inmice

    Diseaseresistantspecies

    Productsusefultohumansbloodclottingfactors,artificialfibres

    Xenotransplantation

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    13/65

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    14/65

    40

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    15/65

    41

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    16/65

    42

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    17/65

    43

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    18/65

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    19/65

    45

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    20/65

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    21/65

    47

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    22/65

    48

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    23/65

    49

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    24/65

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    25/65

    51

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    26/65

    52

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    27/65

    53

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    TheRealWorldContext:UKResearch

    LastNovembertwouniversities,KingsCollegeLondonandNewcastleUniversity,appliedtotheHumanFertilisationandEmbryologyAuthority(HFEA)totocreateearlystage chimeric embryosthatwouldbe99.9

    percenthumanand0.1percentanimalinordertoproduceembryonicstemcells (Telegraph).

    Scientistsproposedusingrabbiteggs.

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    28/65

    54

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    NewsReaction

    DocstocreateMootant cells saidTheSun. Scientiststomixcellsofhumansandcows theDailyTelegraphheadlineditsreport.

    Theaccompanyingarticletoldreadersthathumancellswillbefusedwithrabbit,cowandgoateggs

    opponentsoftheresearch calledtheplans abhorrent yesterdayandclaimedthat

    scientistswereundermining thewholedistinctionbetweenanimalsandhumans. Manynewspapers,includingtheDailyMail,publisheddrawingsofachimera (the

    wordusedtodescribehumananimalembryos) afirebreathingbeastwithalionshead,agoatsmiddle,adragonsrearandaserpentstail.

    thenextgenetichorrorstory beingnightmarishparthumanpartanimalhybrids

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    29/65

    55

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    Ethics

    thisresearchwouldgenerate EScelllineswithgeneticmutationsthatcausehumandisease

    providesamodelforstudyingthediseaseincellculture.

    ParkinsonsandAlzheimersDiseases.

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    30/65

    56

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    Whycreatehybridembryos?

    Thereisashortageofhumanembryos(andespeciallyhumaneggs)forresearch.

    Thosecurrentlyavailablearesurplusfromhumanassistedreproductiontechniques(invitrofertilizationor

    prenatalgeneticdiagnosis) veryrare

    oftenpoorquality

    donotcontainallthegeneticmutationsthatneedtobestudied.

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    31/65

    57

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    Significance

    Creatinghumananimalhybridsassourceofdiseasespecificstemcellshasenormoussignificancefortworeasons

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    32/65

    58

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    1.SelfTransplantation

    Usingthiskindoftechnology,onedaywemaybeabletotakeaskincellfromapatientwithleukaemia,cloneit,deriveembryonicstem(ES)cells,producebloodstemcells,andtransferthebloodcellsbackasatransplant

    afterchemotherapy Althoughhumaneggswouldbeamoresuitablesource

    ofeggsfortheprocedure,thetechniquescouldbedevelopedonhybrids

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    33/65

    59

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    SelfTransplantation

    therewouldbenoneedfordrugstopreventrejection,whichcanbelethal

    couldproducetissuetorepairdamagedorgansliketheheartandbrainwithnocapacityforregeneration,

    providingradicalnewtreatmentsforstrokeandheartattack,Parkinsonsdisease,andmanyotherdiseases.

    RegenerativeMedicine

    holygrail ofmedicine.

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    34/65

    60

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    2.CellularModelsofHumanDisease

    hybridembryoscouldbeusedtostudyinaradicallynewwayanydiseaseinaculturedish

    Cloningasingleskincellfromapatientwithadiseasecouldbeusedtoproduceinexhaustibleamountsofcellsandtissuewiththatdisease

    experimentedupontounderstandwhydiseaseoccurs.

    understandthegeneticcontributiontodisease

    totestvastarraysofnewdrugswhichcouldnotbetestedinhumanpeople.

    reducetheneedforanimalexperimentationbecause

    humancellsandtissues,notpeopleoranimals,couldbeusedtotestnewdrugs.

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    35/65

    61

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    EthicsandSinsofOmission FailingtoDoGoodResearch

    Tofailtodobeneficialresearchisaswrongasdoingharmfulresearch.

    Tofailtoreleaseadrugthatwillsave100,000livesismorallyequivalenttokilling100,000people,andtofailtodevelopadrugthatwillsave100,000livesisthesameasfailingtoreleaseit.

    Wemaynotbeabletopointtothosepeoplewhoseliveswouldhavebeensaved,buttheirlivesarenolessvaluable.

    Throughafailureofmoralimaginationwemaycontinuetoholdbackcloningresearchandberesponsibleforthedeathsofmanypeoplewhoperishedwhilewedelayedthedevelopmentof

    treatments.

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    36/65

    62

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    FourObjectionstoESresearch

    1.LARGENUMBERSOFEGGS researchrequireslargenumbersofeggsthatmustberemovedfromhealthyyoungwomenatsomeriskoflifeandhealthtothem.

    2.ELITISTresearchissaidtobeaWesternluxurywhichwillbeexoticandexpensive,onlybenefitingtherichestcountries.

    3.ADULTSTEMCELLRESEARCHshowsgreatpotentialandispreferable.

    4.recentresearchshowstheremaybeINFECTIOUSandotherrisks,suchasoccurredwithbovinespongiformencephalitis,oftransplantingtissuebacktopeoplewhenitisgrownonforeign

    culture

    material

    or

    uses

    animal

    eggs

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    37/65

    63

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    Response:HybridResearchIsImmunetoTheseObjections

    1.wouldrequirenohumaneggstoproducevastamountsoftissueforthestudyofdisease.

    2.mayresultinthedevelopmentofdrugsforcommonconditionswhichafflictpeopleallaroundtheworld,

    including

    the

    developing

    world.

    3notpossibletouseadultstemcellsinthisway.

    4.noriskofinfectionfromdrugsdevelopedbystudyingtissueinthisway,asthedrugmoleculeswould

    beproducedpharmaceutically.

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    38/65

    64

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    Philosophy

    ImportanceofConceptualDistinctions(Philosophy)

    Theseobjectionsapply(iftheyapplyatall)onlytocloningforselftransplantation.

    Theydonotapplytocloningfordeveloping

    cellularmodels

    of

    disease

    whichwillhelpus

    understandandtreatdisease.

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    39/65

    65

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    ThreeOtherObjectionstoHybridCloningresearch

    1.CreatesandDestroysEmbryos Response:distinguishbetweenthemoralstatusofwanted

    andunwantedembryos. Embryoshaveaspecialmoralstatus potential when

    theyareapartofaprojecttohaveachild

    Murder

    if

    kill

    a

    wanted

    unborn

    child Negligenceisdestroywantedfrozenembryos Whentheyarenot,theyhaveamuchlowerstatus:

    forthatreasonwepermitpeopletodiscardembryosinIVFwhentheyhavecompletedtheirfamily,haveabortion,orusetheIUD.

    Thisresearchwouldnotpreventanychildcominginto

    existence

    who

    would

    have

    existed

    if

    the

    research

    had

    not

    beendone.

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    40/65

    66

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    ThreeOtherObjections

    2.ChimerasareUnnaturalandCrossSpeciesBoundaries

    Thesecondobjectionisthatweshouldnotcreatenewhumannonhumanhybridsorchimerasbecausetheyare

    unnaturalandcrosssomekindofprofoundethicalline.

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    41/65

    67

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    Unnatural

    Response:

    scientistshaveforovertwentyyearsbeeninsertinghumangenesintoanimalstocreateanimalmodelsofthehumandisease.

    asignificantproportionoftheNIHbudgetgoestothisresearch.

    scientistshaveintroducedhumanEScellsintoanimalstostudydevelopmentanddisease

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    42/65

    68

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    LessonsFromHistory

    Foroveradecadewehavehadthepowertocreatehumannonhumanchimerasbyfusingembryos.Indeed,wehavealreadycreatednewanimalssuchasthegeep,broughtintobeingbyfusingagoatandsheepembryo.

    Novellifeformshavebeencreatedandcouldbecreated.

    Thisresearchwillbecloselyregulatedandtheembryosdestroyed,so theircreationislesscontroversialthanconventionalresearch

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    43/65

    69

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    ThreeOtherObjections

    3.SlipperySlopeI:

    researchbringsusonestepcloser toreproductivecloning

    cloningtoproducelivebornbabies.

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    44/65

    70

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    Response:

    Reproductivecloningisunlikelytobesafebasedontheobservationthatclonedanimals(mostlymiceandcows)havehundredsofgenesthatareabnormallyexpressed,inparticulargenes

    importantfor

    fetal

    development.

    Theresultinganimalshaveabnormalitiesduringdevelopment(whichiswhy95%ormoreofclonedembryosabort),atbirth(largeoffspringsyndrome),orlaterinlife(evenseeminglynormal

    mice

    often

    develop

    obesity,

    die

    prematurely,

    or

    developmoretumorsthancontrols).

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    45/65

    71

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    Response

    Theresponsetofearsaboutreproductivecloningisnottobancloning.

    Itistobanreproductivecloning.

    TheU.K.hasalreadybannedreproductive

    cloning,andanyscientistintheU.K.wholetsahybriddeveloplongerthan14dayswouldfacecriminalcharges.

    Tobanthisresearchbecauseoffearsaboutreproductivecloningorcreationofhumannonhumanchimerasisnot

    justtothrowthebabyoutwiththebathwater.Itispossiblytothrowmillionsofbabiesout.

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    46/65

    72

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    Regulation

    Thereisnotaslipperyslopebutasetofsteps.

    LegislationincountriesliketheUnitedKingdomiscapableofeffectivelyregulatingsuchcontroversialresearch.

    Cloning,Transgenesis and

    chimeras

    illustrate

    that

    the

    claim

    that

    ifscientistscan,theywillisfalse. Transgenesis andchimerasareempiricalevidencethat

    thereisnotaslipperyslopetoradicalalterationofthehumankind.

    AsdebateoccurringintheUKnowillustrates,proper

    regulationis

    what

    is

    necessary

    to

    convert

    the

    slope

    to

    aset

    ofsteps.

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    47/65

    73

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    WhatHappenedintheUK?

    On2April2008,thefirsthumananimalembryo wascreatedbyscientistsatNewcastleUniversityunderalicencefromtheHumanFertilisationandEmbryologyAuthority(HFEA).

    ThelegalityofsuchlicenceshasbeenconfirmedbytheHumanFertilisationandEmbryologyBill(theBill),recentlypassedbytheUKParliament.

    TheBill specificallypermitsthe HFEAtolicensethecreationforresearchofseveraltypesofembryosthat

    combinehuman

    and

    animal

    genetic

    material

    (called,

    in

    theBill,humanadmixedembryos).

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    48/65

    74

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    HFEABill

    UndertheBill,humanadmixedembryosaredefinedtoincludeembryosthatarealmostallhuman(cybrids)andalsoembryosthatareuptohalfhumanandhalfnonhumananimal(animal):section4A(5).

    Humanadmixedembryos:1. Cybrids (orcytoplasmic hybrids):formedbyincubating human

    geneticmaterialincytoplasmfromananimal.2. Hybridembryos:formedfromahumaneggandanimalspermor

    viceversa;orfromananimalpronucleusandahumanpronucleus.

    3. Transgenicembryos:formedbyintroducinganimalDNAintooneormorecellsofahumanembryo.

    4. Chimeras:formedbyaddingoneormoreanimalcellstoahumanembryo.

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    49/65

    75

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    Differencesbetweenadmixedembryos

    Cybrids:99.9%humanDNAmatchedtothepersonfromwhomtheywerecloned;verysmallamountofmitochondrialDNAfromtheanimalscytoplasm.

    Hybridembryos:humanandanimalchromosomesbecauseformedbyfertilisingeggandspermfromdifferentspecies.

    Transgenicembryos: variableamountofanimalDNAdependingonhowmanygenesaretransferred.

    Chimeras:humanandanimalcellsbecauseformedbymerginghumanandanimalembryos.

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    50/65

    76

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    SlipperySlopeandPrecautionaryPrinciple

    DailyTelegraph hostedadebateprovocativelytitledHasembryoresearchgonetoofar andpublisheda

    comment

    piece

    by

    Simon

    Hefferwho

    wrotethattheprospect[ofsuchresearch]horrifiesme.Itisaviolationandmongrelisationofourspecies,Heffer said,andoneday,somebody

    willgrow

    abeast

    that

    has

    horns

    and

    a

    tail.

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    51/65

    77

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    TheSlipperySlopeObjection

    Response

    Howvalidistheprediction?

    Howbadisthebottomoftheslope?

    Woulditalwaysbewrongtoradicallybiologicallymodifyhumanbeings?

    O f d U hi C t f P ti l Ethi

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    52/65

    78

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    TheThreattoHumanity

    Objection

    Threattohumanity

    Unnatural

    Affronttohumandignity

    transgressionoftheunspeakablyprofound.

    Repugnancemaybetheonlyvoiceleftthatspeaksuptodefendthecentralcoreofhumanity LeonKass

    O f d U hi C t f P ti l Ethi

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    53/65

    79

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    WhatisHumanity?

    Distinguishesusfromotheranimals

    Notbiology

    Share98.5%ofgenomewithchimps

    MuchofourDNAisviral

    Candidatepropertiesforourmoralstatus[PropertyX]

    capacitytoreason

    capacitytoactfromnormativereasons,includingmoralreasons

    capacitytoactautonomously

    capacityto

    engage

    in

    complex

    social

    relationships

    capacitytodisplayempathyandsympathy

    capacitytohavefaith(believeinagod)

    O ford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    54/65

    80

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    WhatPromotesorErodesOurHumanity?

    Actionswhichexpressourhumanity

    Expressourpracticalrationality

    Modificationtopreventdiseasevs creationoffreaksfor

    entertainment Pigvalvesusedinsurgery

    Xenotransplants

    Piginsulin

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    55/65

    81

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    HumanChimeras

    Possiblereasons

    Eugenic

    SourceofEScells

    Infertilitytreatment

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    56/65

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    57/65

    83

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    TheMoralStatusofChimeras

    Mouse/ratwithbrainmadefromhumanembryonicstemcells

    StudyHuntingtonDisease,AlzheimerDisease

    Doesit

    have

    Property

    X?

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    58/65

    84

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    MoralStatus

    PropertyXcanbepromotedoreroded

    Actionswhicherodeorpromotethecapacitytoengageinpracticalreasoning

    Improvedsensorycapacity,longevity,empathy,rationality,memoryvs ferociousness,violence

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    59/65

    85

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    Conclusion

    Radicalgeneticalterationofhumansisnotnecessarilyathreattoourhumanity

    Itmaybe

    Butitmaypromoteourhumanity

    Anotherlesson:

    Candoesnotimplywill

    Againsttheempiricalversionoftheslipperyslope

    argument

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    60/65

    86

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

    MoralResponsibility

    Oughtimpliescan

    Whenwecouldnotaffectthebiologicalnatureofhumanbeings,wewerenotresponsiblefortheirdeficienciesanddisabilities

    Can(roughly)impliesoughttodecide

    Whenwecaninfluencebiology,wearemorallyresponsiblefortheforeseeableconsequencesoffailingtointervene/leavingittonature

    Wecanbemorallyresponsiblefortheforeseeableconsequencesofouromissions sinsofomission

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    61/65

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    62/65

    88

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    Methods

    (1)soundanalyticphilosophy;

    (2)interdisciplinarycollaborationwithotherresearchersinthehumanitiesandsciencesandtheuseofrelevantempiricalresearchfromthose

    disciplines;

    (3)seamlesscollaborationwithscientistsandmedicalprofessionalsinvolvedinthedevelopmentoftechnologytoidentifyethicalissuesarisingfromimminentandlongtermdevelopments.

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    63/65

    89

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    PracticalEthicsinOxford

    workisbothproactiveaswellasreactive.

    constructiveaswellasobstructive

    itidentifiesstrategiestofacilitategoodscientificdevelopment

    aswell

    as

    identifying

    the

    limits

    to

    research

    and

    development

    oftheseareasofscience.

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    64/65

    90

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    ConvergingTechnologies:NBIC

    Nanotechnology

    Biotechnology

    Informationtechnology

    CognitiveScience

    Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

  • 8/13/2019 New Technologies and Human Enhancement

    65/65

    91

    Julian Savulescu

    www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

    DutchResearchCouncil

    researchprogramontheethicsoftechnology(10MillionEurofor4years)incollaborationwithotherMinisteries andpublicpolicymakers

    (1)inter/multidisciplinarycollaboration(eachprojectunderthis

    program

    has

    to

    demonstrate

    effective

    collaboration

    between

    scientists/engineers,ethicists,andsocialorbehaviouralscientists)

    (2)anticipatoryethicsshouldkickinpreferrably whenitcanstillmakeadifference

    (3)focusondesign(genes,molecules,devices,systems,infrastructure)insteadofexclusivelyonanalysisandevaluation

    (4)researchshouldbeinternational