new realities in managing liquidity - amazon...

20
New Realities in Managing Liquidity A Case Study City and County of San Francisco Hubert R. White, CFA, CTP Investment Officer City and County of San Francisco

Upload: others

Post on 11-Aug-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: New Realities in Managing Liquidity - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/media.csmfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/...New Realities in Managing Liquidity A Case Study City and County of San Francisco

New Realities in Managing LiquidityA Case Study

City and County of San Francisco

Hubert R. White, CFA, CTP

Investment Officer

City and County of San Francisco

Page 2: New Realities in Managing Liquidity - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/media.csmfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/...New Realities in Managing Liquidity A Case Study City and County of San Francisco

City and County of San Francisco: Pool Overview

o Portfolio Size: ~$7.3 Billion (As Of January 31, 2016)

o Actively Managed To Participants’ Cash Flow Needs

o Investment Policy More Conservative Than California

State Investment CodeState Investment Code

o Must Have Sufficient Liquidity To Meet Six Months Of

Cash Flow Needs

o 4-5% Of Portfolio O/N, Roughly 55% Invested < 1 Year

o Rigorous Credit Review And Assessment Process

o Working from a short term and long term cash forecast

2

Page 3: New Realities in Managing Liquidity - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/media.csmfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/...New Realities in Managing Liquidity A Case Study City and County of San Francisco

San Francisco: Portfolio Statistics

State & Local

Government

2.90%

Public Time Deposits

0.02%

Negotiable CDs

14.93%Commercial Paper

6.10%Medium Term Notes

9.34%

Money Market Funds

2.51%

Supranationals

3

U.S. Treasuries

6.80%

Federal Agencies

56.40%

Supranationals

1.02%

Asset Allocation by Market Value

For the month ended January 31, 2016

Average Daily Balance $7,389,504,231.20

Net Earnings $4,201,358

Earned Income Yield 0.669%

Weighted Average Maturity 425 days

Page 4: New Realities in Managing Liquidity - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/media.csmfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/...New Realities in Managing Liquidity A Case Study City and County of San Francisco

San Francisco: Challenges in Managing

Liquidity – Bottom Line

o Increased demand for high quality short-term

Securities coupled with a shrinking supply

due to:

– Changes in 2(a)-7 and migration of Prime Money

Market Funds into Treasury and Agency Money Market Funds into Treasury and Agency Money

Market Funds

– Changes in bank regulations causing an increased

demand for high quality securities along with

increased balance sheet requirements

– Changes in debt issuance preferences

Page 5: New Realities in Managing Liquidity - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/media.csmfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/...New Realities in Managing Liquidity A Case Study City and County of San Francisco

San Francisco: Investment Policy Changes

o Agency Fund Limitation: 70% ----> 85% ----> 100%

o Removed Issuer Limitation (65-70% Average)

o Maximum Duration, When Appropriate

o Adopt Specific Limits On Other Permitted Investments o Adopt Specific Limits On Other Permitted Investments

o Educate And Utilize Different Security Types

– Step-ups, floating rate structures

o Add More Resources , When Possible

o Reassign And Reorganize Investment Priorities

5

Page 6: New Realities in Managing Liquidity - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/media.csmfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/...New Realities in Managing Liquidity A Case Study City and County of San Francisco

San Francisco: Short-Term Fixed Income

Market Liquidity Alternatives

oUS Agency Discount Notes

oCommercial Paper

oGovernment Money Market Funds

oRepurchase AgreementsoRepurchase Agreements

6

Page 7: New Realities in Managing Liquidity - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/media.csmfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/...New Realities in Managing Liquidity A Case Study City and County of San Francisco

US Agency Discount Notes

Overview

o US Dollar-denominated unsecured general obligation with a

maturity less than 365 days

o Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), Federal

Home Loan Mortgage Corp (Freddie Mac), Federal Farm Credit

Bank (Farm Credit), Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB), Federal

Agricultural Mortgage Corp (Farmer Mac), Tennessee Valley Agricultural Mortgage Corp (Farmer Mac), Tennessee Valley

Authority (TVA), International Bank for Reconstruction and

Development (IBRD), International Finance Corporation (IFC),

Inter-American Development Bank (IADB)

o Not a mortgage-backed security – no collateral backing issuance

o Quoted in discount price (Same as T-Bills)

o Date flexibility – maturity date can usually be issued for any

business day

7

Page 8: New Realities in Managing Liquidity - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/media.csmfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/...New Realities in Managing Liquidity A Case Study City and County of San Francisco

US Agency Discount Notes

Credit

o Agency and GSE debt = “effective guarantee”

o Agency debt almost = treasury risk

o Low default risko Low default risk

o Direct line of credit into the Treasury

8

Page 9: New Realities in Managing Liquidity - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/media.csmfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/...New Realities in Managing Liquidity A Case Study City and County of San Francisco

US Agency Discount Notes

Liquidity

oHigh Degree of Liquidity

oSize of programoSize of program

oHow they trade – yield comparison

9

Page 10: New Realities in Managing Liquidity - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/media.csmfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/...New Realities in Managing Liquidity A Case Study City and County of San Francisco

Discount Note Outstanding in Billions

300

350

400

450

500

Bil

lio

ns

as of 12/31/2015

0

50

100

150

200

250

Federal Home

Loan Bank

(Home Loan)

Federal Home

Loan Mortgage

Corp (Freddie

Mac)

Federal

National

Mortgage

Association

(Fannie Mae)

Federal Farm

Credit Bank

(Farm Credit)

Int'l Bank for

Reconstruction

& Dev (World

Bank)

Farmer Mac International

Finance

Corporation

Inter-American

Development

Bank

U.S. Agencies

Bil

lio

ns

10

Page 11: New Realities in Managing Liquidity - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/media.csmfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/...New Realities in Managing Liquidity A Case Study City and County of San Francisco

U.S. Agency Debt Outstanding

500,000

600,000

700,000

800,000

900,000

US

Do

lla

rs

Fannie Mae

Freddie Mac

0

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

US

Do

lla

rs

Freddie Mac

Farm Credit

FHLB

Farmer Mac

11

Page 12: New Realities in Managing Liquidity - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/media.csmfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/...New Realities in Managing Liquidity A Case Study City and County of San Francisco

Commercial Paper

oShort-Term Unsecured promissory note

oMaturities range from 1 Day to 270 Days

oMinimum credit rating must be P1/A-1/F-1

(from at least two of the NRSROs)

o Independent credit analysis performedo Independent credit analysis performed

oApproved Issuer list

oAsset-backed Commercial Paper

12

Page 13: New Realities in Managing Liquidity - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/media.csmfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/...New Realities in Managing Liquidity A Case Study City and County of San Francisco

Commercial Paper

13

Page 14: New Realities in Managing Liquidity - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/media.csmfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/...New Realities in Managing Liquidity A Case Study City and County of San Francisco

Commercial Paper

14

Page 15: New Realities in Managing Liquidity - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/media.csmfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/...New Realities in Managing Liquidity A Case Study City and County of San Francisco

Government Money Market Funds

oUS Treasury and Government Money Market

Funds are not subject to Floating NAVs,

Liquidity Fees, or Redemption Gates

o Institutional Class Shareso Institutional Class Shares

oThree different Funds

oActively monitor Fund portfolios

15

Page 16: New Realities in Managing Liquidity - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/media.csmfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/...New Realities in Managing Liquidity A Case Study City and County of San Francisco

Government Money Market Funds

16

Page 17: New Realities in Managing Liquidity - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/media.csmfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/...New Realities in Managing Liquidity A Case Study City and County of San Francisco

Government Money Market Funds

17

Page 18: New Realities in Managing Liquidity - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/media.csmfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/...New Realities in Managing Liquidity A Case Study City and County of San Francisco

Repurchase Agreements

oSecured loan with collateral with an

approved counterparty

oCredit Analysis performed on potential

counterparty

oDeliverable versus Tri-PartyoDeliverable versus Tri-Party

oCustomized to fit needs – Collateral, Term

o Involves signing a Master Repurchase

Agreement and Custodial Undertaking

18

Page 19: New Realities in Managing Liquidity - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/media.csmfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/...New Realities in Managing Liquidity A Case Study City and County of San Francisco

Repurchase Agreements

19

Page 20: New Realities in Managing Liquidity - Amazon S3s3.amazonaws.com/media.csmfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/...New Realities in Managing Liquidity A Case Study City and County of San Francisco

Additional Strategies

o Established Due Diligence Process To Monitor Collateral And

Holdings

o Increase Approved Names And Ongoing Credit Monitoring

Process

o Look to Short-term Taxable Muni Market for Opportunities o Look to Short-term Taxable Muni Market for Opportunities

20