new optimizing biomarker testing in lung carcinoma · 2019. 1. 19. · 3,101 724 202 76 decision...
TRANSCRIPT
1/18/2019
1
Optimizing Biomarker Testing in Lung Carcinoma
The CAP Guideline on Collection and Handling of Thoracic Small Biopsy and Cytology Specimens for Ancillary Studies
Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri, MD PhDThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
[email protected]@Sinchita_Roy
Objectives
• Challenges associated with specimen collection and resource allocation in pulmonary pathology
• Background and guideline development process
• Draft recommendations
• Conclusions and Q&A
Current Landscape of Lung Biomarker Testing in Small Specimens
Specimen Acquisition
1/18/2019
2
Current Landscape of Lung Biomarker Testing in Small Specimens
• CT guided transthoracic:
Biopsy
FNA
• Transbronchial/endobronchial:
FNA (EBUS TBNA)
Bronchial brushing, bronchial washing, BAL
Biopsy
• Body cavity fluids/effusions
• Metastasis of superficial lesions:
Ultrasound guided biopsy and/or FNA
Palpation-guided FNA
Current Landscape of Lung Biomarker Testing in Small Specimens
Establishing a Diagnosis
Travis WD et al. J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Sep;10(9):1243-1260.
Current Landscape of Lung Biomarker Testing in Small Specimens
Biomarkers to test
1/18/2019
3
Advanced NSCLC is Frequently Diagnosed by Cytology
Most NSCLC patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage and cytology samples may be the only tissue available for diagnosis and ancillary studies
Cytology Specimen Source:
• Aspiration
• Exfoliative (Effusions)
Current Landscape of Lung Biomarker Testing in Small Specimens
Cytology specimens
Several Variables Impact Testing Outcomes
Moore, H.M. Biotech Histochem. 2012 Jan;87(1):18-23. doi: 10.3109/10520295.2011.591833.
Can We Optimize Testing Outcomes?
1/18/2019
4
Defining the Problem
During the collection, triage and processing/handling of minimally invasive pathology specimens from patients with suspected or undiagnosed thoracic abnormalities, what procedural or methodological variables have been shown to optimize testing outcomes so that pathologists’ can provide an evaluation and accurate diagnosis?
Collaborating Societies
PAPANICOLAOU
SOCIETY OF
CYTOPATHOLOGY
Find Gullible the Best People Who Think it will be Fun
1/18/2019
5
Expert Panel Members
• Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri, MD, PhD, Co-chair, CAP
• Christopher R. Gilbert, DO, Co-chair, ATS
• Sanja Dacic, MD, PhD, AMP
• Mohiedean Ghofrani, MD, MBA, CAP
• Peter Illei, MD, ASC
• Lester Layfield, MD, PSC
• Christopher Lee, MD, STR
• Claire Michael, MD, PSC
• Ross A. Miller, MD, PPS
• Jason W. Mitchell, MD, MPH, MBA, SIR
• Boris Nikolic, MD, MBA, SIR
• Jan Nowak, MD, PhD, AMP
• Nicholas J. Pastis, Jr., MD, CHEST
• Carol Ann Rauch, MD, PhD, CAP
• Amita Sharma, MD, STR
• Lesley Souter, PhD, methodology consultant
• Paul VanderLaan, MD, PhD, ASC
• Jesse Voss, CT(ASCP), ASC
• Brooke Billman
• Nicole Thomas, CAP Guideline Manager
Key Questions
1) With regard to each of the specimen types of interest, what evidence is available to determine the most effective protocols for sample collection, including:
• immediate handling of the specimen (e.g. how the needle biopsy is expelled from needle; selection of the appropriate media)
• the number of passes needed to ensure that the laboratory can obtain adequate materials for diagnostic testing
• the impact of ROSE on adequacy, quality, and triage of specimens
Key Questions (contd)
2) With regard to each of the specimen types, the preparations, and the tests to be performed, what evidence is available to determine the most effective methods for the handling and processing of specimens, including:
• the selection of appropriate media
• the optimal ischemic time?
1/18/2019
6
Key Questions (contd)
3) With regard to the various pathologic testing methods, what evidence is available to support an algorithm(s) for selection of specimens and sequence of testing, under defined circumstances?
Systematic Literature Review
Literature SearchTitle abstract
screening Full Text Review
screeningData Extraction
Quality Assessment for each study by methodologist
Grading
3,101 724 202 76
Decision Making During Evaluation of Lung CancerThoughts from the Clinical Side
1/18/2019
7
Lung Cancer Diagnosis
Method of diagnosis depends on:• Size of tumor
• Location of tumor
• Presence of metastatic disease
• Overall clinical status of patient
CHEST 2013; 143(5)(Suppl):e142S–e165S
Diagnosis Alone is not Good Enough
CHEST 2013; 143(5)(Suppl):e142S–e165S
Tissue Acquisition Methods
1/18/2019
8
What is the Best Method
The “best” test does the following:
• Allows diagnosis and staging simultaneously
• Obtains adequate tissue for ancillary testing as will most likely be needed
• Maximizes yield
• Minimizes risk
• Suitable for your institution and your patient
Primum non nocere (Do No Harm)
Draft Guideline Statements
1. Recommendation – Endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS TBNA) should be used, if available, for initial evaluation (diagnosis, staging, identification of recurrent/metastatic) of mediastinal and hilarlymph nodes, as well as centrally located parenchymal lesions visible with endobronchialultrasound.
21 written comments
Draft Guideline Statements
2. Recommendation – When performing EBUS TBNAs, 21 or 22 gauge needles may be used.
20 written comments
1/18/2019
9
Case Presentation 1
• 72 y/o smoker presents with cough and intermittent hemoptysis
• Exam unremarkable
• CXR and CT imaging concerning for left upper lobe/hilarmass
• EBUS-TBNA of multiple lymph nodes
• ROSE POSITIVE for malignant cells
ROSE for diagnosis? ROSE for molecular markers?
Is it important?
ROSE Can Ensure Adequate Sampling and Appropriate Triage
• ROSE can ensure adequate sampling and triage
• Performing additional pass in anticipation of ancillary studies
• If molecular lab prioritizes cell blocks, maximize the needle rinse material for cell block
• If molecular lab prioritizes smears, minimize cell block material
Case Presentation 1:Final Diagnosis
A: Lymph node, 4R, FNA smears and cell block: Adenocarcinoma
B: Lymph node, Station 7, FNA smears and cell block: Adenocarcinoma
C: Lymph node, 4L, FNA smears and cell block: Adenocarcinoma
• IHC (specimen A cell block): TTF1 positive; p40 negative
Biomarker request:
• PD-L1 IHC; Mutation analysis (EGFR); FISH (ALK,ROS1)
1/18/2019
10
Draft Guideline Statements
3. Recommendation - When performing EBUS TBNA, rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) should be utilized, if available.
35 written comments
Draft Guideline Statements
4. Recommendation – When performing EBUS TBNA:
• Without ROSE, the bronchoscopist should perform at minimum 3 and up to 5 passes.
• With ROSE, clinical judgment should be used to assess the number of passes needed.
Note: Additional passes may be required for ancillary studies.
24 written comments
Case Presentation 2
• 64 y/o female nonsmoker fell while walking on some ice and had horrible chest pain
• Went to ER to be evaluated
• No pertinent prior medical history
• Noted to have abnormality on same side as rib
• EBUS-TBNA, small hilar lymph node identified
• 11L: ROSE, lymphocytes, no definitive malignant cells
• Bronchoscopy with Navigation – unable to find lesion
• Converted to transthoracic approach• FNA and core needle bx of LUL lesion
1/18/2019
11
Case Presentation 2:Final Diagnosis
A: Lymph node, 11L, FNA smears and cell block: No metastatic carcinoma; lymphocytes present
B: Lung, LUL, FNA smears and cell block: Adenocarcinoma
C: Lung, LUL, core biopsy: Adenocarcinoma
• IHC (specimen C): TTF1 positive; p40 negative
Biomarker request:• PD-L1 IHC; Mutation analysis (EGFR); FISH (ALK,ROS1)
Draft Guideline Statements
5. Strong Recommendation - For transthoracic needle procedures, ROSE should be utilized, if available. If performing CNB only, touch preparations may be used for ROSE.
44 written comments
Draft Guideline Statements
6. Recommendation - For transthoracic fine needle aspirations (FNAs) ≥25 gauge needles may be used. For core needle biopsies (CNBs) ≥20 gauge needles may be used.
23 written comments
1/18/2019
12
Draft Guideline Statements
7. Recommendation - For transthoracic FNA samples without CNB, the proceduralist should obtain multiple passes, if possible and should attempt to collect sufficient material for a tissue block (i.e., cell block, tissue clot).
28 written comments
Draft Guideline Statements
8. Recommendation - For transthoracic CNB samples, the proceduralist should obtain a minimum of three core samples.
Note: Additional passes may be required for ancillary studies
39 written comments
Draft Guideline Statements
9. Recommendation – When performing bronchoscopy for the investigation of peripheral nodules/abnormalities, additional image-guidance adjuncts (endobronchial ultrasound, navigational bronchoscopy techniques) should be used, if available.
10. Recommendation – For transbronchialsamples, ROSE should be used, if available.
11 written comments
23 written comments
1/18/2019
13
Case Presentation 3
• 42 year old female from Kenya with no past history presents with right sided shoulder pain to her PCP
• Physical normal, exam for decreased breath sounds
• In light of exam findings, PCP suggests CXR
• Thoracentesis1500cc bloody appearing effusion removed
Fluid triage: How much to send
and where?
Thoracentesis
Micro
Thoracentesis
1/18/2019
14
Thoracentesis
ADC
• IHC for subtyping
• Biomarker testing
TTF1
Case Presentation 3:Final Diagnosis
• Collected 15cc for biochemical and microbiological lab,
remainder sent to cytology
Left pleural fluid, thoracentesis:
Metastatic adenocarcinoma
• IHC performed (cell block): TTF-1 positive; Calretinin negative
Biomarker request:
• PD-L1 IHC; Mutation analysis (EGFR); FISH (ALK,ROS1)
Draft Guideline Statements
11. Expert Consensus Opinion – The proceduralistshould send as much fluid volume as possibly attainable for cytologic evaluation.
41 written comments
1/18/2019
15
Advanced NSCLC is Frequently Diagnosed by Cytology
Most NSCLC patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage and cytology samples may be the only tissue available for diagnosis and ancillary studies
Cytology Specimen Source:
• Aspiration
• Exfoliative (Effusions)
Draft Guideline Statements
12. Expert Consensus Opinion – When evaluating the adequacy of cytology FNA specimens for molecular analysis, ROSE should be used, if available.
26 written comments
Draft Guideline Statements
13. Recommendation – CNB samples collected for mutational analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and immunohistochemistry (IHC), should be fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin.
26 written comments
1/18/2019
16
Draft Guideline Statements
14. Recommendation – Cytology specimens (smears, cell blocks, liquid based cytology), may be used for mutational analysis, FISH, and IHC studies.
35 written comments
Case Presentation 4
• 18 y/o female from Ethiopia
• Cough, fevers, dysphagia, hemoptysis
• CT Chest done
• Bronchoscopy • BAL
• EBUS-TBNA
Case Presentation 4:Final Diagnosis
A: Lymph node, station 7, FNA smears and cell block:
No malignant cells identified
Inflammatory cells and necrotic debris
Comment: AFB and GMS stains are negative
B: Lung, left upper lobe, bronchoalveolar lavage, ThinPrep
cytology and cell block:
No malignant cells identified
Lymph node: mycobacterium complex confirmed via DNA probe
1/18/2019
17
Draft Guideline Statements
15. Recommendation – When performing bronchoscopy for the investigation of tuberculosis, the use of EBUS TBNA, should be performed in addition to bronchoalveolarlavage and transbronchial biopsy, if available.
16. Recommendation – When performing EBUS TBNA for the evaluation of intrathoracic granulomatous lymphadenopathy with the suspicion of tuberculosis, specimens should be collected for cytology, microbiology (mycobacterial smear and culture), and TB-PCR evaluation, if available.
17. Recommendation – When collecting pleural fluid for diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis, specimens should be submitted for microbiology culture studies for mycobacteria using liquid media protocol.
18/9/6 written comments
No Recommendations
• The use of one collection media (i.e., formalin, CytoLyt, Hanks, or CytoRich), one fixative (i.e., alcohol or formalin), or one stain (DiffQuik or Papanicolaou) over another for ancillary studies in cytology specimens.
Cytology Collection/Handling
J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6: 203–206
1/18/2019
18
No Recommendations
• The use of a stylet for EBUS TBNAs
• The optimal ischemic time
• The sequence of testing for an algorithm
Conclusions
• The forthcoming CAP guideline offers 17 draft recommendations to help clinicians and laboratories collect, handle, and process small biopsy specimens to maximize the capability of appropriate downstream testing.
• Manuscript release ~ Q2 2019.
Acknowledgements
• The collaborating societies and their staff, the expert and advisory panel members for their time and commitment to the guideline
• Nicole Thomas & Sophia Dimoulis
@Sinchita_Roy