new material options for innovation in restorative and ... peek/letteratura peek.pdf · new...

Download New Material Options for Innovation in Restorative and ... PEEK/Letteratura PEEK.pdf · New Material Options for Innovation in Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry Invibi }Biomaterial

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: buikien

Post on 06-Feb-2018

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • New Material Options for Innovation in Restorative and

    Prosthetic Dentistry

    2011

  • New Material Options for Innovation in Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry

    Crowns and Bridges

    PEEK Based Polymers for Dental

    In-Vitro Fracture Resistance of Three-Unit Fixed Dental Prostheses

    PEEK 3-Unit Bridge Wear Resistance to In-Vitro Ageing

    Compressive Fracture Load of 3-Unit Bridges with Different Connector Sizes

    Compressive Fracture Load of Molar Crowns

    Veneering Systems

    Cement System and Surface Preparation of PEEK Substructures

    CAD/CAM Machining Tool Life

    Polymer Typical Mechanical Properties (Granular)

    Polymer Physical Properties

    Colour and Radiolucency

    Acknowledgements

    Key Literature Overview

  • New Material Options for Innovation in Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry

    Invibi Biomaterial Solutions develope and launched its flagship biomaterial

    PEEK-OPTIMA - the first-ever advanced thermoplastic biomaterial to be used in

    implantable medical devices in 1999. Over 3 million medical devices now benefit from a

    set of unique properties that have been utilised in spine, orthopaedic and sports medicine

    applications.

    Invibios PEEK materials have been successfully used by world leading dental companies in

    applications such as healing caps and temporary abutments due to its mechanical strength, aesthetic

    qualities, soft tissue response and the ability to shape PEEK easily. However the long term

    biocompatibility of PEEK means that the material can provide solutions in a wider range of implant

    applications within restorative and prosthetic dentistry.

  • Crowns and Bridges

    Mechanical properties and biocompatibility for permanent metal-free crowns and bridges

    Veneer repair without the need for crown removal and natural tooth loss

    Allows diagnostic treatment without substructure removal

    Material stiffness aimed at improving comfort with excellent preservation of antagonist

    natural tooth

    The present document provides technical information and guidance to the dental device manufacturer and dental practicing regarding the use of PEEK based polymer for dental crowns and

    bridges permanents.

  • PEEK Based Polymers for Dental

    PEEK-OPTIMA offers exceptional product purity, quality testing and control. Invibio provides

    assurance agreement, guaranteeing its long term specification and production methods.

    Its proven biocompatibility and biostability is supported by US FDA Drug & Device Master files and

    thousands of regulatory approved implantable devices. In fact, no other implantable PEEK is as

    extensively used in US FDA, CE-marked and other regulatory body approved devices.

    Invibio have been optimising the properties of PEEK based materials for permanent crowns and

    bridges. Shapes for CAD/CAM have been successfully injection moulded. Its ability to be machined

    from a block using a Cerec milling machine has been determined. We have generated the following

    information, necessary to provide guidance towards dental substructure and cement and veneer

    system selection.

  • In-Vitro Fracture Resistance of Three-Unit Fixed Dental Prostheses

    PEEK dental three unit fixed prostheses showed excellent performance during in-vitro investigation.

    No damage occurred to the frameworks or decementations were observed during the prolonged

    chewing simulation time used to simulate oral stress conditions equivalent to 5 years intraoral use.

    PEEK restorations have greatly exceed the fracture resistance required to withstand masticatory

    forces assumed for anterior (300N) and posterior regions (500-600N) Behr et al. 2001, Clinical Oral

    Implants Research 12: 174-178. Therefore PEEK substructures could be used in clinical applications.

    * Kolbeck et al. 2008, Clin. Oral Impl. Res., 19: 1049-1053

    ** Beuer et al. 2008, European Journal of Oral Sciences, 116: 381-386

    *** Scientific Documentation IPS e.max Ceram , Ivoclar Vivadent

    Literature values are of a comparative nature, but were not tested under the exact same conditions.

    The CAD/CAM milled PEEK frameworks were cemented on to PMMA models using commercial

    available Dentsply Calibra Esthetic Resin Cement. The frameworks were veneered with 3M ESPE

    SinfomyTM Indirect Lab light-curing Composite. After 24h of storage in 37 distilled water the

    marginal areas were cleaned and polished and transferred to the chewing simulation. The dentures

    were aged using a human molar as antagonising tooth with 1.2x106 mechanical loads of 50N and

    6000 alternating thermal cycles of 5 and 55C. This simulation is expected to have comparable

    effects to 5 years of intraoral stress. Krejci et al. 1990, Schweizer Monatsschrift Zahnmedizin 100:8-4;

    Rosentritt et al. 1977. Materialprfung, 39:77-80. All restorations survived and were mechanically

    loaded until failure in a universal testing machine (Zwick, Germany). Force was applied in the pontic

    centre using a steel ball and a tin foil to avoid force peeks at the cusp tips. Fracture force (N) was

    recorded.

    950

    659

    770

    1331

    2055

    0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

    Lithium Dislicate Glass Ceramic ***

    Glass-Infiltrated Alumina **

    Alumina Strengthened with Zirconia **

    Zirconia Y-TZP *

    PEEK Dental

    Fracture Force (N)

  • PEEK 3-Unit Bridge Wear Resistance to In-Vitro Ageing

    In contrast to ceramic and metal materials it was shown that PEEK dental 3-unit bridge substructures

    were not weakened by in-vitro ageing. Results below show that PEEK 3-unit bridge fracture

    resistance was maintained even after chewing simulation.

    * Beuer et al. 2008, European Journal of Oral Sciences, 116: 381-386

    Literature values are of a comparative nature, but were not tested under the exact same conditions.

    CAD/CAM milled PEEK based dental polymer 3-unit bridges were cemented on to PMMA models

    (Dentsply Calibra Esthetic Resin Cement) and exposed to thermal cycling and mechanical loading

    (TCML: 6000x5C/55C; 1.2x106x50 N). Fracture force was measured using a universal testing

    machine (Zwick, Germany).

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    Frac

    ture

    Fo

    rce

    (N)

    PEEK Dental Y-TZP Zirconia * Alumina Srengthened

    with Zirconia *

    Glass-Infiltrated

    Alumina *

    AgedNo Ageing AgedNo Ageing AgedNo Ageing AgedNo Ageing

  • Compressive Fracture Load of 3-Unit Bridges with Different Connector Sizes

    In order to provide guidance towards bridge design and morphology, 3-unit bridge PEEK

    substructures with different connector dimensions were tested for compressive fracture load. All

    PEEK substructures showed high fracture resistance demonstrating its potential for clinical use even

    with small connector dimensions.

    1411

    1534

    1783

    0 500 1000 1500 2000

    10

    12.3

    15

    Fracture Force (N)

    Bri

    dge

    Co

    nn

    ect

    or S

    ize

    (mm

    )

  • Compressive Fracture Load of Molar Crowns

    Un-veneered and veneered (3M ESPE SinfomyTM Indirect Lab Composite) PEEK crowns were bonded

    on to identical epoxy resin models and subject to compressive loading to simulate clinical conditions.

    PEEK crowns were shown to withstand very high compressive loads.

    * Knowles et al 1998, J Mat Sci: Materials in Medicine, 9: 555-559

    ** Scientific Documentation IPS e.max CAD , Ivoclar Vivadent

    Literature values are of a comparative nature, but were not tested under the exact same conditions.

    2070

    0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

    Feldspathic Ceramic **

    Lithium Dislicate Glass Ceramics **

    Leucite Reinforced Ceramic *

    Glass Infiltrated Alumina *

    PEEK Dental Veneered Restoration

    PEEK Dental Substructure

    Fracture Force (N)

    Max

    Min

    Min Max

    Max

    Max

    Max

  • Veneering Systems

    Standard techniques were used to fabricate restorations from the PEEK based dental polymer

    substructures. Good results were obtained using a range of commercial available veneering

    composites. In the case of veneer chipping, PEEK substructures can allow repair without the need for

    crown or bridge replacement.

    * Beuer et al. 2008, European Journal of Oral Sciences, 116: 381-386

    Literature values are of a comparative nature, but were not tested under the exact same conditions.

    Please contact Invibio Ltd if looking for additional veneer systems.

    160

    219

    242

    0 50 100 150 200 250

    Zirconia Y-TZP

    PEEK/3M Espe Filtek Silorane

    PEEK/Voco Admina Ormocer

    PEEK/3M Espe Filtek Z250

    Bi-axial Flexural Strength (MPa)

    Min Max

  • Cement System and Surface Preparation of PEEK Substructures

    Restorations fabricated with PEEK based dental polymer can be cemented using a range of

    commercial available systems. The internal configuration of the PEEK substructure should be

    roughened using a diamond bur and degreased using acetone. This procedure will increase the bond

    strength of the PEEK dental material and the luting systems.

    * Kumbuloglu et al. 2006, Operative Dentistry, 31-2: 248-255; zcan et al. 2008, Clin Oral Invest, 12:

    279-282 Literature values are of a comparative nature, but were not tested under the exact same conditions.

    11.2

    11.8

    21.1

    0 5 10 15 20 25

    Zirconia Y-TZP *

    PEEK/Panavia 21 EX, Kuraray Dental

    PEEK/Rely X Unicem Aplicap, 3M ESPE

    PEEK/Calibra Esthetic Resin Cement, Dentsply

    Bond Strength (MPa)

    Max Min

  • CAD/CAM Machining Tool Life

    PEEK dental injection moulded shapes allow CAD/CAM milling of dental substructures with reduced

    tool wear and improved margin control allowing for tight fit restorations. PEEK blocks can be

    successfully machined using a CEREC milling machine and standard burs. For the CEREC milling of

    PEEK blocks, the machine can be set up as if to mill either CadWaxx or InCerami alumina blocks. Even

    after 50 (fifty) PEEK 3-unit bridges have been milled, there was no need to change CEREC milling bur.

    Polymer Typical Mechanical Properties (Granular)*

    Property Method Units PEEK Based Polymers for Dental

    Flexural Strength ISO 178 MPa 320

    Flexural Modulus ISO 178 GPa 20

    Tensile Strength (at yield) ISO 527 MPa 190

    Youngs Modulus ISO 527 GPa 19

    Compressive Strength ISO 640 MPa 240

    Tensile Elongation (at break) ISO 527 % 1.0

    Notch Izod Impact ISO 180 kJ/m2 8

    * Testing performed on direct injection moulded sample.

    Please contact Invibio Ltd for flexural strength properties according to ISO 10477

    0 10 20 30 40 50

    Ceramics

    PEEK Dental

    3-units Bridges Milled

    Tool Life

  • Polymer Physical Properties

    PEEK polymers present high chemical resistance with extremely low levels of extractables and leachables, allowing for excellent in-mouth stability and inertness. PEEK displays very low thermal conductivity and is electrically non-conductive, providing excellent in-mouth natural feel. PEEKs excellent strength to weight ratio provides low weight substructures, improving comfort. Patients have reported natural mouth feeling and no foreign object sensation when using PEEK based dental solutions.

    Property Method Units PEEK-OPTIMA Dental

    Density ASTM D792 g.cm-3 2.0

    Colour and Radiolucency

    PEEK polymer is naturally radiolucent and compatible to imaging techniques such as X-ray, MRI and Computer Tomography (CT). PEEK dental polymer radiolucency allows clinical diagnostics and treatment through PEEK substructure without need for substructure removal and replacement. PEEK is available in natural and white for improved aesthetics.

  • Acknowledgements

    The in-vitro fracture resistance of PEEK based dental polymer three-unit fixed dental prostheses

    work was conducted in collaboration with C. Kolbeck and M. Rosentritt at the Regensburg University

    Medical Centre, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Regensburg, Germany.

    The compressive fracture load of PEEK based dental polymer crowns and three-unit fixed dental

    prostheses, veneer system and cement system testing, surface preparation of PEEK substructures

    and CAD/CAM machining guidance was conducted in collaboration with D. Wood and A. Johnson at

    the University of Sheffield, School of Clinical Dentistry, Sheffield, UK.

  • Key Literature Overview

    PEEK-OPTIMA Polymer Materials in Dental Applications

    This summary provides a sample of the most recent and historical literature pertaining to PEEK

    polymer in dental clinical evaluations

    Paper Key Findings

    Effect of different surface pre-treatments and

    luting materials on shear bond strength to PEEK

    Schmidlin PR, Stawarczyk B, Wieland M, Attin T,

    Hmmerle CH, Fischer J.

    June 2010, Dental Materials

    The study shows that strong bonds can be

    achieved between PEEK and dental resin

    composites. Observations suggest that the pre-

    treatment of the PEEK surface greatly improved

    its adhesion to the hydrophobic bonding agent

    tested. The results demonstrate potential for the

    use of PEEK in dentures and encourage further

    research in PEEK application in dentistry.

    Bonding of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for

    Indirect Restorations

    Wood DJ, Johnson A, Van Noort R, Sereno N.

    March 2011, International Association of Dental

    Research

    In this study the bound strength to reinforced

    PEEK polymer aimed at use in dental crown and

    bridges was tested using a range of commercial available cement composites.

    Each of the three cement systems showed good

    bond strength to the PEEK material samples with

    Dentsply Calibra Esthetic Resin Cement resisting

    to higher loads.

  • Fracture Strength and Failure Mode of Maxillary

    Implant-Supported Provisional Single Crowns:

    A Comparison of Composite Resin Crowns

    Fabricated Directly Over PEEK Abutments and

    Solid Titanium Abutments

    Santing HJ, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Ozcan M.

    December 2010, Clinical Implant Dentistry &

    Related Research

    The study showed that PEEK abutments provide a

    viable alternative to titanium abutments for use in

    the aesthetic zone of the maxilla.

    It has been demonstrated that PEEK abutments

    are able to withstand intraoral masticatory forces

    to a similar level as titanium abutments.

    PEEK abutments can also be processed in the

    dental surgery, allowing a chair-side approach,

    and their white colour makes it easier to achieve a

    good aesthetic result.

    A New Transitional Abutment for Immediate

    Aesthetics and Function

    Tetelman ED, Babbush CA.

    July 2008, Implant Dentistry

    This paper describes how important the choice of

    the right provisional prosthesis such as the PEEK

    abutment displaying stable aesthetics and

    function during the healing phase, is important in

    maintaining patients comfort and satisfaction.

    The PEEK abutment provides a cost effective

    versatile solution allowing chair-side modification

    in the dental surgery at the time of implant

    placement.

    Furthermore PEEKs proven soft tissue behaviour supports the good recovery of gingival tissue.

  • SNB Swiss Non-Ligating Bracket. A New and

    Promising Bracket

    Karp J.

    July 2010, ESLO congress, Excellence in Lingual

    Orthodontics

    A new bracket solution made from PEEK polymer

    with two parallel slots allows for a more efficient

    way of controlling the torque and the

    enhancement of stability of the buccal segments.

    As well as therapeutical advantages the PEEK

    bracket displays low friction resulting in a

    reduction of treatment time.

    Metal as connector between implant and

    prosthetic called in question: The PEEK a new,

    durable and simple solution

    Spahn F.

    October 2010, 46th SFCMFS congress

    The paper describes the positive benefits of the

    use of PEEK basal implants and PEEK dental

    abutments in the clinic. PEEK basal implants

    proved valuable in clinical cases with low or poor

    bone levels. PEEK abutments have been

    successfully used to treat implant failure without

    the need of implant removal.

    Nano Hydroxyapatite Coated PEEK Implants:

    Pilot Study in Rabbit Bone

    Barkarmo S, Wennerberg AE, Hoffman M, Kjellin

    P, Stenport V.

    March 2011, International Association of Dental

    Research

    In this study the surface of the PEEK implants

    was coated with nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (HA) in order to improve osseointegration to

    bone tissue.

    It was shown that PEEK coated with nano HA

    may be a successful approach to improve

    osseointegration, however good primary stability

    is necessary for optimal healing

  • Osseointegration of one-piece zirconia implants

    compared with a titanium implant of identical

    design: a histomorphometric study in the dog

    Koch FP, Weng D, Krmer S, Biesterfeld S, Jahn-

    Eimermacher A, Wagner W.

    March 2010, Clinical Oral Implant Research

    The study demonstrated that PEEK dental

    implants survived implantation testing with no

    indications of damage to the implant.

    Histomorphometric analysis indicated a positive

    bone-to-implant contact for PEEK of 27%.

    Surface Modification of PEEK -Parallel

    Investigations of Primary Human Osteoblast

    Cytocompatibility and Bacterial Adhesion

    Poulsson A.

    April 2010 Scandinavian Society for Biomaterials.

    The brief exposure of PEEK-OPTIMA to oxygen

    plasma treatment resulted in an increase in

    surface energy of the PEEK. Following treatment,

    primary human osteoblast-like cells

    demonstrated an increased rate of adhesion to

    the surface. A corresponding increase in cell functionality

    was also observed at an earlier time point than

    that seen on the untreated surface.

    Taken together, these results suggest that

    plasma treatment of PEEK may increase its

    osseointegrative potential. Importantly, such

    treatment did not increase the susceptibility of

    PEEK to bacterial adhesion.