new haven/fairfield counties ema
DESCRIPTION
New Haven/Fairfield Counties EMA. 2010 Assessment of the Administrative Mechanism-- Results Friday, September 9 th , 2010 Burroughs Community Center. What is the Assessment of the Administrative Mechanism and why do we do it?. 5) d. Administrative Assessment - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
2010 Assessment of the Administrative Mechanism-- Results
Friday, September 9th, 2010 Burroughs Community Center
5) d. Administrative AssessmentThe Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program mandates that the EMA/TGAPlanning Councils must assess the efficiency of the administrativemechanism to rapidly allocate funds to the areas of greatest needwithin the EMA/TGA.
Provide a narrative that describes the results of the Planning Council’s assessment of the administrative mechanism in terms of:◦ Activities such as timely payments to contractors or data collection; and◦ Corrective action or suggested methods of improvement that were
recommended. ◦ If any deficiencies were noted, what were the deficiencies, what was the
grantee’s response to those deficiencies, and what is the current status of the grantee’s response?
1. Part A funds were expended in a timely manner (Net 30?).2. Part A contracts with service providers were signed in a timely manner3. During FY 2010, the EMA had less than 3%(?) carryover in Part A funds.4. Part A resources were reallocated in a timely manner to ensure the
needs of the community are met.5. Part A Programs funded in FY 2010 matched the service categories and
percentages identified during the Council’s Priority Setting and Resource Allocation process
6. Planning Council Directives were reflected in Part A programs funded in FY 2010
Net 30 means that buyer will pay seller in full on or before the 30th calendar day (including weekends and holidays) of when the Goods were dispatched by the Seller or the Services were fully provided
Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Avg
33 33 36 17 21 19 16 20 28 22 15 13 22.8
Total carryover request of $116,933.79 Total FY 2010 Part A award: $7,227,221 1.6% carryover requested in FY 2010
Original Budget Allocation Revision Final Budget Allocation
1,207,075.00$ 30,592.00$ 1,237,667.00$ 1,442,601.00$ (36,781.00)$ 1,405,820.00$
971,549.00$ 971,549.00$ 677,140.00$ 13,301.00$ 690,441.00$ 117,765.00$ (2,497.00)$ 115,268.00$
58,883.00$ (2,615.00)$ 56,268.00$ 4,475,013.00$ 4,477,013.00$
353,292.00$ 353,292.00$ 294,409.00$ 32,000.00$ 326,409.00$ 117,765.00$ 117,765.00$ 235,525.00$ (13,000.00)$ 222,525.00$ 294,410.00$ 4,000.00$ 298,410.00$ 117,765.00$ 117,765.00$
1,413,166.00$ 1,436,166.00$
5,888,179.00$ 25,000.00$ 5,913,179.00$
Emergency Financial Assistance
Totals
Medical Case ManagementSubstance Abuse-OutpatientMental HealthOral Health
Food Bank/ Home Del. Meals
NEW HAVEN/FAIRFIELD Allocations FY 2010
EMA 2010
Outpatient/ Amb. Medical Care
OutreachTotal Non-Core
Health InsuranceTotal Core Services
Housing AssistanceSubstance Abuse-InpatientMedical Transportation
Service Category (HRSA)2010
Allocated% of Request 2010 Spent
% of Request
1 Medical Transportation $ 117,763 2% $ 117,765 2%2 Outpatient/Ambulatory Medical Care $ 1,207,075 21% $ 1,237,667 21%3 Housing Services $ 353,290 6% $ 353,292 6%4 Medical Case Management $ 1,442,602 25% $ 1,405,820 25%5 Food Bank/Home Delivered Meals $ 294,409 5% $ 298,410 5%6 Emergency Financial Assistance $ 235,527 4% $ 222,525 4%7 Substance Abuse Services-Outpatient $ 971,548 17% $ 971,549 17%8 Mental Health Services $ 677,140 12% $ 690,441 12%9 Oral Health Care $ 117,763 2% $ 115,268 2%
11 Health Insurance Premium/Cost Sharing $ 58,882 1% $ 56,268 1%12 Substance Abuse Services-Inpatient $ 294,409 5% $ 326,409 5%13 AIDS Pharameceutical Assistance (local) $ - 0%14 Early Intervention Services Not funded Not funded
Total Services $ 5,770,408 $ 5,795,414 TOTAL ALLOCATION 5,770,408$ 5,795,414$
DIRECTIVE 1.1 - TO FACILITATE GEOGRAPHIC FUNDING DISTRIBUTION- TRUE
DIRECTIVE 1.2 - TO FACILITATE COST EFFECTIVENESS AND FULL EXPENDITURE OF FUNDING ACROSS ALL SERVICE CATEGORIES-TRUE
DIRECTIVE 1.3 – TO SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SERVICE DELIVERY SYSTEM WITHIN EACH OF THE PLANNING COUNCIL’S FIVE REGIONS-TRUE
DIRECTIVE 2.1 – TO PROMOTE COLLABORATIVE PLANNING AND POLICY-MAKING WITHIN EACH OF THE PLANNING COUNCIL’S FIVE REGIONS—TRUE
DIRECTIVE 2.2 – TO FACILITATE DEVELOPMENT OF AND ADHERENCE TO THE EMA’s STANDARDS OF CARE—TRUE
DIRECTIVE 2.3 – TO FACILITATE SERVICE UTILIZATION DATA-TRUE
2009 Assessment of the Administrative Mechanism