new distribution records of the genus stenodactylus ... · (reptilia, sauria) in tunisia (north...
TRANSCRIPT
The occurrence of geckos of the genus Stenodactylus in Tunisia has been reported by earlier authors (Boulenger, 1891; Escheriech, 1896; Mayet, 1903; Chabanaud, 1916; Mosauer, 1934; Blanc and Shane, 1980; Bons et al., 1984; Blanc, 1979c, 1986; Blanc and Nouira, 1988). More recent works provided data on the taxonomy and distribution ranges of the three Stenodactylus species currently reported to occur in Tunisia: S. sthenodactylus, S. petrii and S. stenurus (Nouira 1996; 1997; Nouira and Lescure, 1998; Kratochvil et al., 2001; Joger, 2003).
In this paper we provide a distribution review and comment on the range boundaries of the species in Tunisia. Additionally, we provide details on the occurrence on Tunisian insular environments.
Located in North Africa, Tunisia is separated from Europe by the Channel of Sicily (140 km).With a total area of 163,610 km², it has a northern and western mountainous relief; an eastern plain side (Le Sahel) and a southern part mostly desert. The largest of the saline lakes is Chott El Jerid (Karray, 1979). A geographical regionalization of Tunisia was imposed by the presence of the Dorsal chain. It is the eastern extension of the Atlas Mountains that runs across North Africa in a northeasterly direction from the Algerian border in the west to the Cape Bon Peninsula in the east. Northward the Dorsal lies the Tell region (low, rolling hills and plains). Climate is largely influenced by this regionalization which inspired Emberger (1950) to establish a climatic subdivision of Tunisia into five bioclimatic stages: Humid, Sub-humid, Semi-Arid, Arid and Saharan.
Fieldwork took place in spring and summer seasons from 1996 to 2011. The entire Tunisian territory was surveyed seeking for active geckos, their burrows, and their tracks, while consistently noting geological and geographical characteristics. A total of 136 localities were used for mapping purpose (Table 1, Fig. 1). Maps were composed and spatial data were explored with QUANTUM-GIS (Q-GIS, 2009). Some specimens of unknown identification were captured, fixed with 95° ethanol, numbered and held in the Laboratory of Population Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science of Tunis for further identification. Species were identified based on the keys provided by (Loveridge, 1947; Schleich et al., 1996 and Nouira, 1997).
About half (51.6%) of the visited localities contained the genus Stenodactylus which was represented by two species: S. sthenodactylus (Lichtenstein, 1823) and S. petrii Anderson, 1896. Our sampling did not contain the third species reported to occur in Tunisia: S. stenurus (Kratochvil et al., 2001).
Stenodactylus petrii occurs in North Africa, Mauritania, Sudan, Senegal, Mali, Eritrea, Niger and South of Israel (Uetz and Hallermann, 2012a). Its distribution in Tunisia was first described by Nouira (1996, 1997) and subsequently by Joger (2003). With an exception of Tieret (31.042345, 10.184097), most literature sightings range around Chott El Jerid within the Saharan zone (Fig. 2). We report here five new records that expand the previously described eastern boundaries (Fig. 2). This discovery expands the distribution range into the Arid zone with continental influence.
Stenodactylus sthenodactylus Lichtenstein 1823 occurs in North Africa, Mauritania, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Sudan, North of Kenya, Mali, Middle East and Saudi Arabia (Uetz and Hallermann, 2012b). The species distribution in Tunisia has been once enlarged by Nouira (1996) to have a northern boundary at Ein Errahma (36.236, 10.415) and a southern one at Guelb El Enz (32.442, 10.383). This distribution ranges from the Semi-Arid to the Saharan stages. Additional points of occurrence within this area are provided in Fig. 2. More importantly, we report the discovery of a new locality within the
Herpetology Notes, volume 5: 413-418 (2012) (published online on 10 September 2012)
New distribution records of the genus Stenodactylus (Reptilia, Sauria) in Tunisia (North Africa)
Wided Tlili1,*, Ridha Ouni2 and Saïd Nouira1
1 Unité de recherche “Biodiversité and Biologie des populati-ons”, 05/UR/09-10. Département de Biologie, Faculté des Sciences Mathématique, physique et biologiques de Tunis (FST), Campus Universitaire 2092, El Manar Tunis; e-mail: [email protected]
2 Tunisian Wildlife Conservation Society. Faculté des Sciences Mathématique, physique et biologiques de Tunis (FST), Campus Universitaire 2092, El Manar Tunis.
*Corresponding author
Wided Tlili et al.414
Nam
e N
um.
Lat
.L
ong.
Nam
e N
um.
Lat
.L
ong.
Nam
e N
um.
Lat
.L
ong.
Nam
e N
um.
Lat
.L
ong.
La G
alite
1
37.5
3216
3 8.
9259
34
Bou
Fic
ha
4536
.301
6 10
.454
7 M
akna
ssy*
89
34.6
166
9.6
Deh
iba
133
32.0
166
10.7
B
izer
te2
37.2
744
9.87
38Sa
kiet
Sid
i You
ssof
46
36.2
247
8.35
61M
ezzo
una*
9034
.583
3 9.
8333
Lorz
ot13
431
.763
3 10
.348
6 R
as e
l Dje
bel
337
.216
6 10
.133
3 El
Kef
47
36.1
822
8.71
47
Bou
hedm
a*
9134
.475
517
9.64
9356
D
jene
ien*
135
31.7
33
10.1
505
Raf
raf
437
.183
3 10
.183
3 En
fida
4836
.135
2 10
.380
8 O
uled
cha
bou*
92
34.4
5313
7 9.
6102
18
Tier
et
136
31.0
38
10.1
752
Gha
r El M
elh
537
.180
725
10.1
7528
5 Si
liana
4936
.083
3 9.
3666
Gaf
sa*
9334
.425
8.78
41Ti
nja
637
.161
3 9.
7597
H
ergl
a*
5036
.033
3 10
.5
Tam
erza
* 94
34.3
833
7.95
M
enze
l Bou
rgui
ba
737
.157
621
9.78
4327
B
ir K
helif
a51
35.9
58
9.17
16
Red
eyef
* 95
34.3
833
8.15
Fe
rtoun
a 8
37.1
547
9.90
25
Sidi
Bou
Ali*
52
35.9
566
10.4
73
El G
ueta
r*
9634
.337
2 8.
9527
A
udja
937
.133
3 10
.1
El A
lem
* 53
35.9
088
10.0
586
Mat
laou
i*
9734
.333
3 8.
4 La
c ic
hkeu
l 10
37.1
2929
6 9.
6763
52
El K
sour
* 54
35.8
963
8.88
66
Che
bikh
a*98
34.3
166
7.93
33
Zem
bra
1137
.128
133
10.8
0184
9 Ta
jero
uine
55
35.8
913
8.55
55
Sidi
man
sour
* 99
34.2
5932
9.
5555
66
Sidi
Sal
em
1237
.109
1 9.
5438
Si
di A
meu
r 56
35.8
808
9.49
02
Men
zel h
bib*
10
034
.231
117
9.59
655
Seje
nane
1337
.057
2 9.
238
Sidi
Bou
Grin
e 57
35.8
691
9.13
3 W
adhr
af*
101
33.9
833
9.96
66
El H
aoua
ria
1437
.050
8 11
.010
8 M
akth
ar
5835
.860
5 9.
2058
To
zeur
* 10
233
.920
5 8.
1333
M
ateu
r 15
37.0
4 9.
6663
So
usse
*59
35.8
255
10.6
411
El H
amm
a*
103
33.9
9.
8 Ta
bark
a 16
36.9
544
8.75
8 K
esra
60
35.8
119
9.36
44
Ras
s Erm
el *
10
433
.898
204
10.9
2845
Si
di T
ahbe
t 17
36.9
094
10.0
452
Zaou
iet S
ouss
e61
35.7
877
10.6
28
Gab
es10
533
.883
3 10
.116
6 A
riana
18
36.8
625
10.1
955
Mon
astir
* 62
35.7
833
10.8
333
Naf
tah*
106
33.8
741
7.87
97
Oue
d EL
Abi
d*
1936
.817
146
10.7
0125
6 M
sake
n*
6335
.733
3 10
.583
3 B
ordj
Sai
dane
* 10
733
.766
6 9.
3 K
orbo
us
2036
.816
6 10
.566
6 K
neis
6435
.683
3 10
.516
6 K
etta
na*
108
33.7
666
10.2
El
Bat
tan
2136
.816
1 9.
84
Kai
roua
n*
6535
.674
4 10
.101
6 C
hott
El F
jeje
10
933
.758
641
9.37
1166
B
ardo
22
36.8
091
10.1
405
Roh
ia*
6635
.664
7 9.
0547
Si
diJm
our*
11
033
.729
765
10.7
3824
9 Tu
nis-
Vill
e23
36.8
027
10.1
797
Ksa
r Hel
lal
6735
.65
10.9
Keb
ili*
111
33.7
019
8.97
36A
in D
raha
m
2436
.793
12
8.68
1717
H
affo
uz*
6835
.635
9.67
69B
orj E
l Kas
til*
112
33.7
0149
3 10
.974
798
Rad
es25
36.7
68
10.2
752
Jam
mal
69
35.6
333
10.7
666
Mar
eth
113
33.6
333
10.3
B
eja
2636
.733
3 9.
1833
M
okni
n*
7035
.633
3 10
.9
Mat
mat
a 11
433
.55
9.96
66
Ham
man
-Lif
2736
.733
10
.336
1 Ta
lah*
71
35.5
744
8.67
22
Bou
Ghr
ara*
11
533
.537
7 10
.676
1 So
liman
28
36.6
963
10.4
916
Meh
dia*
72
35.5
047
11.0
622
Tam
ezre
t*
116
33.5
333
9.86
66
Oue
d Ze
rga
2936
.683
3 9.
4166
Q
sour
Ess
af*
7335
.420
2 10
.998
Za
rzis
11
733
.5
11.1
166
Fern
ana
3036
.654
7 8.
6975
H
adje
b el
Aio
un*
7435
.396
9 9.
5455
D
ouz*
118
33.4
575
9.02
16
Maj
az a
l Bab
31
36.6
5 9.
6166
Si
di A
mor
Bou
Had
jla*
7535
.396
6 10
.045
2 M
eden
ine*
11
933
.354
7 10
.505
2 B
ani K
halla
d 32
36.6
5 10
.6
Soua
ssi
7635
.35
10.5
5 B
en G
arda
ne*
120
33.1
333
11.2
166
Kor
ba
3336
.578
6 10
.858
6 El
Dje
m*
7735
.3
10.7
166
Gho
mra
ssen
* 12
133
.059
4 10
.34
Dje
bel O
ust
3436
.557
2 10
.06
Jilm
a*
7835
.274
1 9.
4252
Q
sar G
hila
n*
122
339.
6333
Ta
zark
a35
36.5
511
10.8
333
Che
bba*
7935
.237
2 11
.115
Jbil
123
32.9
939.
0399
17
Test
our
3636
.55
9.45
Sbei
tla*
8035
.229
7 9.
1294
Kra
chou
a*12
432
.816
6 10
.566
6 El
feyd
ja
3736
.506
345
8.25
3121
K
asse
rine*
81
35.1
672
8.82
88
Sidi
Tou
i*
125
32.7
333
11.3
666
Jend
ouba
38
36.5
011
8.77
94
Sidi
Bou
zid*
82
35.0
402
9.49
36
El A
byed
h Si
d Ec
hikh
12
632
.531
71
9.12
491
Ben
i Khi
ar
3936
.469
1 10
.782
2 Si
died
dhah
er*
8334
.867
666
10.0
7906
9 A
lent
oure
de
Jébi
l 12
732
.521
94
9.18
137
Tebo
urso
uk
4036
.466
6 9.
25
Er R
egue
b*
8434
.866
6 9.
7833
A
l Bor
ma
128
32.4
7304
3 9.
1349
03
Nab
eul*
4136
.45
10.7
333
Che
rgui
* 85
34.7
561
11.2
491
Gho
ur E
l Kel
b 12
932
.460
15
9.21
107
Zagh
ouan
e 42
36.4
10
.15
Sfax
8634
.740
5 10
.760
2 Er
g or
ient
al
130
32.3
5574
9.
0611
5 El
Fah
s*
4336
.366
9 9.
905
Bir
Ali
Ben
Kha
lifa*
87
34.7
333
10.1
R
amad
ah*
131
32.3
166
10.4
G
affo
ur44
36.3
333
9.31
66M
alita
h*88
34.6
527
11.0
319
Bor
j Bou
rgui
ba13
232
.064
334
10.1
9525
5
Table 1. Inventoried sites. Num.: the station number as pointed in the map. Sites with Stenodactylus geckos present are indicated with an asterisk*
New distribution records of Stenodactylus genus 415
Figure 1. Map of Tunisia: Geographical location and inventoried sites
Figure 2. Distribution ranges of the genus Stenodactylus in Tunisia: A: S. petrii, B: S. sthenodactylus.
sub-humid zone in the north of Cape Bon Peninsula: Oued El Abid (36.874403, 10.691357). The locality is in a coastal area characterised by a strip of sandy dunes (50 to 100 m of altitude) fixed by Juniperus phoenicea (or Ammophila arenaria) and crossed to the south by a permanent river. Five specimens were encountered; only two individuals were captured (Fig. 3: ♂ [5480], ♀ [5481]). Despite the fact that the distribution of the species seems to be expanding, it is still limited by the Dorsal Mountain. In fact, we have not found any other individuals in the Tell region despite the similarities between its coastal area and that of Cape Bon.
Within insular environments (Fig. 1), only S. sthenodactylus was encountered in Kerkennah (two big islands and 11 islets) and Djerba Archipelagos (One main island and three islets). The distribution of the species in Chargui and Gharbi Islands does not vary from that provided by Blanc and Nouira (1988). However, five individuals were encountered later (2001-2002) in Sefnou (2 ♀: [5132-5133], 1 ♂: [5134]), Ramadya (1 ♂: [5167]) and Guremdi (1 ♂: [5178]). As for Djerba Archipelagos, seven specimens were captured from three sites within the main island (Sidi Jmour (♂[5490], ♀[5491]), Rass Ermel (♂[5497] ) and Borj El kastil (3 ♀[5498], 1 ♂[5499]). We note that both Kerkennah and Djerba Archipelgos are located within Arid stage with maritime influence.
Wided Tlili et al.416
Figure 3. Distribution ranges of Stenodactylus sthenodactylus within insular environments
Figure 4. Stenodactylus sthenodactylus from Oued El Abid (Cape Bon Peninsula): ♀: female, ♂: male
Acknowledgments. Field expeditions and animal collection were carried out after obtaining authorization from the Tunisian Ministry of Agriculture (Forestry Management Department). Several trips were taken in cooperation with the Faculty of Sciences of Tunis and the “Association des Amis des Oiseaux”. Special thanks are addressed to Michel Delaugerre who helped the achievement of this work. We express our gratitude to Dr. Nessrine Akkari, Aymen Nefla, and Dr Shauna Joy Hawkins for their cooperation. The editors and an anonymous reviewer provided helpful comments on previous versions of the manuscript.
References
Blanc, C.P. (1979c): Notes sur les reptiles de la Tunisie: IV. Dif-férences morphologiques et écologiques entre les représen-tants des genres Tropiocolotes Peters, 1880 et Stenodactylus Fitzinger, 1826. Archives de l’Institut Pasteur de Tunis 56: 67-80.
Blanc, C.P. (1986): Le peuplement en reptiles de l’extrême sud tunisien. Amphibia-Reptilia 7: 385-392.
Blanc, C.P., Shane, M. H. (1980): Les reptiles et les Batraciens de la région de Bou Hedma. Bulletin de la Société des Sciences naturelles de Tunisie 13: 25-28.
Blanc, Ch. P., Nouira, S. (1988): Faune herpétologique des îles Kerkennah. Inventaire et Distribution. Bulletin. Ecologique 19(2-3): 259-263.
Bons, J., Cheylan, M., Girot B. (1984): Les reptiles Méditerra-néens. Bulletin de la. Société Herpétologique de France 29: 7-17.
Boulenger, G.A. (1891): Catalogue of the Reptiles and Batracians of Berbary (Marocco, Algeria and Tunisia) based chiefly upon the notes and collections made in 1880-1884 by M. Fernand Lataste. Transaction of Zoological Society 13: 93-164.
Chabanaud, P. (1916): Sur divers reptiles de Kébili (Sud tunisien) recueilli par M. le Commandant Vibert. Bulletin du Musée d’Histoire naturelle 22: 226-227.
Escheriech, C. (1896): Beitrag zur fauna der tunisichen insel Djerba. Verhandl. Verhandlungen der Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien 46: 268-279.
Fujita, M.K., Papenfuss, T.J. (2010): Molecular systematics of Stenodactylus (Gekkonidae), an Afro-Arabian gecko species complex. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 58(1): 71-75.
IUCN, (2012): The IUCN Red List for threatened species availa-ble at: http://www.iucnredlist.org. Last access on 9 Mai 2012.
New distribution records of Stenodactylus genus 417
Figure 5. Natural habitat of Stenodactylus sthenodactylus in Oued El Abid, with sandy dunes fixed by Ammophila arenaria
Accepted by Philip de Pous; Managing Editor: Philipp Wagner
Joger, U. (2003): Reptiles and Amphibians of Southern Tunisia. Kaupia 12: 71-81.
Kratochvil, L., Frynta, D., Moravec, J. (2001): A third Stenodac-tylus in Africa: Return of the forgotten Stenodactylus stenurus. Israel Journal of Zoolgy 47 (2): 99-109.
Loveridge, A. (1947): Revision of the African lizards of the fami-ly Gekkonidae. Bulletin du Museum of Comparative Zoology 98: 1-50.
Mayet, E. (1903): Catalogue raisonné des Reptiles et Batraciens de la Tunisie. Reptiles et Batraciens, Paris.
Mosauer, W. (1934): The Reptiles and Amphibians of Tunisia. Publications of University of California in Biological Sciences 1(3): 49-64.
Nouira, S. (1996): Systématique, Ecologie et Biogéographie évolutive des Lacertidae (Reptilia, Sauria). Importance dans l’herpétofaune tunisienne. Unpublished PhD thesis, Faculté des Sciences de Tunis, Tunis, 342 pp.
Nouira, S. (1997): Biodiversité de l’herpétofaune tunisienne : II. Les Gekkonidae (Reptilia, Sauria). Bulletin de la. Société des Sciences Naturelle de Tunisie 26: 66-74.
Nouira, S., Lescure, J. (1998) : Les noms scientifiques français des Amphibiens et Reptiles de Tunisie. Bulletin de la société herpétologique de France 85-86 : 37-54.
Q-GIS (2009): Quantum-GIS: Open Source Geographic Infor-mation System (GIS) licensed under the GNU General Public License: http:/ http://www.qgis.org.
Schleich, H.H., Kästle, W., Kabisch, K. (1996): Amphibians and Reptiles of North Africa. Koenigstein, Koeltz.
Uetz, P., Hallermann, J. (2012a): Stenodactylus petrri, The Repti-le Database. Available at: http://reptile-database.reptarium.cz. Last access on 9 Mai 2012.
Uetz, P., Hallermann, J. (2012b): Stenodactylus sthenodactylus, The Reptile Database. http://reptile-database.reptarium.cz/. Last access on 9 Mai 2012.
Wided Tlili et al.418